Translator Disclaimer
11 November 2013 Nutmeg-vertebrate interactions in the Asia-Pacific region: importance of frugivores for Seed dispersal in Myristicaceae
Shumpei Kitamura, Pilai Poonswad
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In tropical forests, large frugivores are assumed to be important seed dispersers for many large-seeded trees such as the Myristicaceae, a widespread and common family. However, not all frugivores are effective seed dispersers, and understanding which frugivores are effective is vital for conservation biology. Here, we summarize the available data on fruit characteristics and frugivores for a large number of Myristicaceae species in the Asia-Pacific region and suggest future directions for evaluating the effects of disperser loss for these trees. Studies of fruit characteristics of Myristicaceae were highly biased toward morphological information, and few studies examined reproductive phenology or fruit chemistry. We identified 338 instances of nutmeg-frugivore interactions that included 129 species of Myristicaceae and 109 species of frugivores, including 40 bird, 68 mammal, and one reptile species. Large birds were major seed dispersers for this tree family. These bird species, such as hornbills and pigeons, consumed a variety of nutmeg species, remained briefly at fruiting trees, and dispersed intact seeds far from the parent trees in the forest. Although most seeds dispersed by birds subsequently suffered high seed predation by rodents, some germinated and established as seedlings, indicating the qualitative effectiveness of large birds as seed dispersers for Myristicaceae. Mammals were also major consumers of Myristicaceae. Gibbons, macaques, and civets potentially acted as long-distance dispersers for some nutmeg species. Orangutans, leaf monkeys, squirrels, and rodents consumed a variety of nutmeg species, but their roles as seed dispersers for Myristicaceae remain unclear. Studies of nutmeg-vertebrate interactions have typically focused on frugivory, whereas few studies have specifically quantified the effectiveness of frugivores as seed dispersers; thus, it remains difficult to evaluate the effect of frugivore loss on the populations of most nutmeg species in this region. Further studies of nutmeg-frugivore interactions are of great ecological importance, and the results of such studies will contribute to a general understanding of which evolutionary forces may have shaped current nutmeg-frugivore interactions in tropical forests worldwide.

Introduction

Seed dispersal plays a critical role in the maintenance and recovery of plant diversity [1, 2]. This is especially true for the dispersal of seeds in highly diverse tropical rain forests, which usually support a wide range of potential dispersers. Most tropical woody plants have fleshy fruits [3, 4], and most tropical vertebrates eat fruits [5, 6]. In general, fruit (or seed) size usually limits the number of frugivores that can disperse the seeds [789]. Small fruits and large, soft fruits with many small seeds are consumed by a wide spectrum of frugivores, whereas larger fruits with a single large seed are consumed by relatively few potential dispersers [10, 11]. The seed dispersal of large-seeded plant species is therefore primarily dependent on large-bodied frugivores that are susceptible to extinction as a result of deleterious direct and indirect anthropogenic activities [9, 111213].

The tropical rain forest tree family Myristicaceae consists of 500 species in 20 genera with a pantropical distribution centered in Malesia [14, 15]. In ecological studies of tropical rain forest tree communities, the Myristicaceae, or nutmeg, frequently ranks among one of the most important tree families, based on species frequency as well as species diversity [16]. In lowland rain forests of Malaysia, 30-40 nutmeg species have been recorded at a given study site, e.g., Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak [17] and Pasoh Forest Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia [18]. Based on tree inventory data from 28 lowland dipterocarp rain forest locations throughout Borneo, Myristicaceae was the sixth most abundant tree family, accounting for 4.3% of all trees, and Knema was the eighth most common tree genus, accounting for 2.2% of trees in lowland dipterocarp forests [19]. The Myristicaceae is therefore an ideal family for studying general patterns of tropical forest diversity, and additional data for the nutmeg family will contribute valuable information to the general understanding of tropical forests.

Myristicaceae has a relatively conserved fruit and seed morphology (Fig. 1); therefore, one might expect that similar suites of frugivores consume and disperse the seeds. In the Neotropics, numerous studies related to the seed dispersal of Myristicaceae have been conducted since the 1970s, and large frugivorous birds and primates have been documented as the primary seed dispersers for this family [20]. In the Asia-Pacific region where the six genera Endocomia, Gymnacranthera, Horsfieldia, Knema, Myristica, and Paramyristica are distributed (Fig. 2), the primary seed-dispersal agents of these fruits are large birds such as fruit pigeons, hornbills, and birds of paradise [212223]; however, the available data on seed dispersal in Myristicaceae are still limited, especially in terms of the effectiveness of dispersers [24]. Several criteria have been used to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of vertebrate frugivores as dispersers [24]; these include the size and diversity of fruits ingested, high fruit consumption, short visitation times, long gut retention times with seeds undamaged after gut passage, fruits swallowed whole with few dropped below parent trees, behavior and movements during and after feeding, and seed deposition at suitable sites for germination.

Fig. 1.

Ripe fruits of Myristicaceae in Budo-Sungai Padi National Park, southern Thailand. a: Knema globularia, b: Horsfieldia tomentosa, c: Myristica iners.

10.1177_194008291300600503-fig1.tif

Although human impacts on frugivores specifically affect trees with large seeds in this region [11, 25], information on nutmeg-vertebrate interactions remains limited. Making existing data accessible to a wider audience is the first step toward applying what is known about the effectiveness of nutmeg-eating frugivores as seed dispersers for Myristicaceae and filling in gaps in knowledge. Our objectives in this study were to summarize the available data for Myristicaceae in the Asia-Pacific region in terms of (i) fruit traits and (ii) each frugivore in terms of the quantity and quality of dispersal, as well as to provide future directions for studies evaluating the effects of disperser loss for this family of trees.

Fig. 2.

Distribution of Myristicaceae in the Asia-Pacific region and the major study sites cited in this review. NP: National Park, WS: Wildlife Sanctuary.

10.1177_194008291300600503-fig2.tif

Literature survey

We first searched for data on characteristics of nutmeg fruits using Flora Malesiana [15], which covers 335 nutmeg species distributed in Indonesia, Malaysia, Burnei Darussalam, Singapore, the Philippines, and Papua New Guinea. We supplemented this search with regional floras, including Flora of Thailand [26], Flora of China [27], Flora of the Darwin Region [28], Myristicaceae of Papua [29], and other relevant studies in India and Tonga, to cover the distribution limit of Myristicaceae in this region (Fig. 2). To obtain the mean fruit/seed sizes of each nutmeg species, we averaged the minimum and maximum sizes reported in these studies. In most cases, these values were measured from herbarium specimens; therefore, the sizes calculated from these studies were likely smaller than those for fresh fruits/seeds in the field.

We then compiled a database on nutmeg species known to be consumed and dispersed by frugivores from the Asia-Pacific region. On 20 May 2011, we searched the Web of Science to obtain publications including the keywords “nutmeg”, “Myristicaceae” and several frugivores that occur in this region, such as “hornbill,” “pigeon,” “civet,” “gibbon,” “leaf monkey,” “macaque,” and “rodent.” We also examined recent reviews on frugivory by elephants [30], hornbills [31], gibbons [32], bears [33], and orangutans [34]. We supplemented these searches with literature cited by relevant studies and searches of regional journals as well as books on primates [35, 36] and pigeons [37]. Whenever possible, we recorded body mass data for each frugivore species from various sources [3637383940414243] and the individual sources obtained in the literature survey. Values for body mass were the average for males and females [44].

We attempted to survey all major references, but the compiled lists were not exhaustive. The literature varies in clarity and quality; we excluded general accounts that list diets without giving the original source of information found in field guides and newsletters, but we included data found in books, journals, conference proceedings, and theses. These combined approaches resulted in data from a total of 84 publications, including 13 from books/book sections, 62 from peer-reviewed journals, one from conference proceedings, and eight from theses. A high proportion of studies included data on frugivory by hornbills (23 publications), followed by leaf monkeys (22), gibbons (15), macaques (14), and pigeons (11). Several publications included frugivory data on different frugivore groups; thus, the total number of studies that focused on frugivory was over 84. Plant nomenclature was revised according to the International Plant Name Index.

Characteristics of fruits in Myristicaceae

Fruit and seed size

In total, 352 nutmeg species were compiled by literature survey, and data were obtained for fruit length and diameter (N = 322 spp.), seed length (134 spp.), and seed diameter (18 spp.). Fruit sizes of Myristicaceae strongly varied among genera and species. Mean fruit size (length × diameter) at the genus level occurred in the following order: Gymnacranthera (2.3 × 1.5 mm, 6 spp.), Knema (2.9 × 2.0 mm, 79 spp.), Horsfieldia (3.0 × 2.2 mm, 88 spp.), Myristica (4.5 × 2.9 mm, 142 spp.), Paramyristica (4.8 × 2.8 mm, 1 sp.), and Endocomia (5.2 × 2.5 mm, 4 spp.). Seed length of Myristicaceae also varied among genera and species (Fig. 3): Endocomia (2.4-4.5 mm, 4 spp.), Horsfieldia (0.9-5.5 mm, 4 spp.), Knema (2.1-2.5 mm, 4 spp.), Paramyristica (3.0 mm, 1 sp.), and Myristica (1.4-5.5 mm, 121 spp.).

The sizes of nutmeg fruits/seeds also varied among species within a study site. The mean diameters of flesh arillate seeds were 21 mm (14-29 mm, N = 24 spp.) in Kutai National Park, Borneo [45], and 20 mm (10-30 mm, N = 14 spp.) in Budo-Sungai Padi National Park, Thailand (S. Kitamura, unpublished data). In both study sites, the mean diameters of flesh arillate seeds of Myristicaceae were significantly larger than those of non-Myristicaceae (Welch's t-test, t = 5.70, P < 0.001, nutmeg = 9 spp., non-nutmeg = 180 spp. in Kutai; t = 2.97, P < 0.009, nutmeg = 9 spp., non-nutmeg = 423 spp. in Budo-Sungai Padi). We did not find any study that focused on individual variation in fruit/seed sizes of Myristicaceae in this region.

Fig. 3.

Seed size variation among genera in Myristicaceae.

10.1177_194008291300600503-fig3.tif

Phenology

At the species level, most nutmeg species fruited every year in India [46474849], Thailand [505152], the Philippines [53], and Australia [54]. In Khao Yai National Park, Thailand, Knema elegans fruited at the intraspecies level in all 6 years but varied among individuals [50]. At the same site, a different nutmeg species, Horsfieldia amygdalina (formerly reported as Horsfieldia glabra in [10]), fruited every year from 1996 to 2003, except for 2000 [52]. Similarly, some nutmeg species exhibited annual fruiting patterns in lowland dipterocarp forests of Borneo, but others had supra-annual fruiting patterns [55, 56]. However, most studies on the reproductive phenology of Myristicaceae from Bornean forests did not collect large enough sample sizes to measure individual variation within a species; thus, determining differences among fruiting behaviors of Myristicaceae in this region is still difficult.

Aril color

In the literature survey, aril color was reported for 61 nutmeg species (Endocomia: 3 spp., Gymnacranthera: 3 spp., Horsfieldia: 19 spp. Knema: 19 spp., and Myristica: 18 spp.). Of these, red was the most common color of nutmeg arils (45 spp.), followed by orange (26 spp.), yellow (9 spp.), and pink (2 spp.). Similarly, within a study site, red arils were the most common in Myristicaceae (N = 7 spp.), followed by orange (3 spp.) in Budo-Sungai Padi National Park, southern Thailand [57].

Fruit chemistry

Little research has been conducted on fruit chemistry of Myristicaceae in this region, but available data suggest that the seeds/arils of nutmegs contain high lipid content both in the seeds [58]: Myristica elliptica (55.0%), Knema hookeriana (28.4%), and Myristica cinnamomea (8.5%), and in the arils [21, 58, 59]: M. elliptica (15.8%), Myristica sp. (57%), H. amygdalina (41.6%), and K. elegans (18.2%). These high lipid contents were preferred by porcupines in one Malaysian forest [58].

Diversity of nutmeg species eaten by frugivores

Regarding the taxonomic representation of nutmeg species eaten by different frugivore groups, the numbers vary widely (Table 1). We identified 338 instances of nutmeg-frugivore interactions that included 129 species of Myristicaceae, including Endocomia (1 sp.), Gymnacranthera (5 spp.), Horsfieldia (15 spp.), Knema (31 spp.), Myristica (43 spp.), and unidentified Myristicaceae genera (33 spp.), as well as 109 species of frugivores, including 40 bird, 68 mammal, and 1 reptile species (Fig. 4, Appendix 1).

Fig. 4.

The interactions between genera of Myristicaceae and frugivores in the Asia-Pacific region. Five genera and ‘unknown’ Myristicaceae sp. are eaten by 23 different frugivore groups (mammals and reptiles in grey, and birds in black). Width of triangles indicates the number of documented interactions.

10.1177_194008291300600503-fig4.tif

In terms of the number of nutmeg species eaten by each frugivore group, we identified hornbills and pigeons as major consumers of Myristicaceae among birds, and primates and squirrels among mammals (Table 1). More complete diet information is available for more thoroughly studied frugivores. Furthermore, frugivores from less diverse ecosystems, such as dry forests of India, show lower nutmeg diversity in their diet. Only 27% of frugivores consumed three or more nutmeg species as part of their diets (Fig. 5a). The maximum number of nutmeg species eaten by one type of frugivore was achieved by the orangutan Pongo pygmaeus (27 species), followed by bushy-crested hornbills Anorrhinus galeritus (20), wreathed hornbills Rhyticeros undulatus (19), and great hornbills Buceros bicornis (15). We found no relationship between mean body mass and the number of nutmeg species eaten by any frugivore group (Spearman's rank correlation, P > 0.05).

The maximum number of frugivores that consumed specific nutmeg species was recorded for K. elegans (12 spp.), followed by Horsfieldia irya (11) and M. elliptica (11). Most nutmeg species (68.2%) were eaten by only one or two frugivore species (Fig. 5b). As expected, frugivores in forests with high nutmeg diversity or inhabiting long-term study sites consumed the largest numbers of nutmeg species (e.g., Borneo and southern Thailand; Fig. 2). However, the number of frugivore species recorded for a given nutmeg species was likely underestimated, as most data on nutmeg-frugivore interactions reported from this region are based on studies of frugivores and not on observations of fruiting nutmeg trees.

Table 1.

Summary of nutmeg-frugivore interactions in Asia-Pacific region. Frugivore groups are listed in decreasing order of the number of nutmeg species eaten by each group.

10.1177_194008291300600503-table1.tif

Fruit tree visitation, seed retention time, and dispersal distance

Several studies observed fruit consumed from large-seeded trees in this region [13, 60, 61], but most did not include Myristicaceae; thus, the data available on the visit frequency of frugivores to nutmeg trees are limited. One of the best-observed nutmeg species was Myristica hypargyraea in Tonga [62]. These authors found that the Pacific pigeon Ducula pacifica (118 visits) visited most frequently, followed by the red shining musk parrot Prosopeia tabuensis (17 visits) and the insular flying fox Pteropus tonganus (5 visits). Most seeds of M. hypargyraea were estimated to be dispersed by D. pacifica; ca. 80% of those ingested were expelled directly beneath conspecific fruiting crowns, 20% were dispersed locally, and <0.3% were dispersed more than 300 m into a different forest type [62].

In a Bornean forest with diverse nutmeg species (12 species over 205 observation hours), Leighton found that the mean visitation rate of hornbills ranged from 0.02 to 0.72 visits per hour per crop, which was one of the most frequently visited fruiting trees by hornbills [45]. However, the author presented no data on visit lengths of hornbills or the number of arillate seeds eaten by hornbills per visit at nutmeg trees [45]; thus, we could not quantitatively estimate the effectiveness of hornbills from these data. Hornbills usually remained in fruiting trees for a median of 20 min [45, 47, 60, 61, 63], and the median seed retention time of H. amygdalina by captive hornbills (B. bicornis and R. undulatus) was 40-50 min; 22% of the seeds were retained longer than 1 h (S. Kitamura, unpublished data). As hourly movements of hornbills sometimes exceed 6 km in the wild (S. Kitamura, unpublished data), they are able to transport nutmeg seeds far from parent trees.

Other frugivores such as gibbons, macaques, and civets are also likely to disperse seeds 100 m beyond parent plants [6465666768]; thus, they potentially act as long-distance dispersers for some nutmeg species. Squirrels sometimes carry a whole fruit in their mouth away from the Myristicaceae tree for consumption in the canopy of neighboring trees or for later consumption (M. Yasuda, personal communication), but they appear to be poor distance-dispersers, with seeds deposited no more than 10 m from the fruiting crown [69].

Fig. 5a

Frequency histogram of cumulative number of frugivores per nutmeg species in the Asia-Pacific region.

10.1177_194008291300600503-fig5.tif

Fig. 5b

Frequency histogram of cumulative number of nutmeg species per frugivore species in the Asia-Pacific region.

10.1177_194008291300600503-fig6.tif

Extent of damage to seeds during consumption

We found that hornbills and pigeons as well as gibbons, macaques, and civets were reported to disperse intact seeds of Myristicaceae [10, 46, 707172]. Hornbills and pigeons (Ducula spp. and Ptilinopus spp.) mostly swallowed arillate seeds of Myristicaceae and regurgitated the seeds intact [10, 21, 62, 70]. Of the mammals, gibbons (Hylobates lar) and civets (Viverra zibetha) in Thailand swallow both the seed and aril of K. elegans and then disperse the seeds through defecation [71]. Long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in Singapore spit out seeds of Knema latericia and Knema laurina [72]. Other primates, such as orangutans and leaf monkeys, squirrels, and rodents consume many Myristicaceae fruits (Table 1), but the literature often does not make a clear distinction between consumption of the pulp and seeds; thus, their roles as seed dispersers for Myristicaceae remain unclear.

Despite the long list of frugivory records (Appendix 1), most studies did not investigate the potential viability of the nutmeg seeds defecated, regurgitated, spat, or dropped away from the parent trees by frugivores. The available data do not suggest any negative effects on the germination success of nutmeg seeds regurgitated by hornbills. The germination success of Horsfieldia kingii was similar between hornbill-regurgitated seeds (41%) and fallen seeds (33%) in India [47]. Over 90% germination success was recorded for hornbill-regurgitated nutmeg seeds, including Horsfieldia tomentosa, Knema globularia, and Myristica iners, but less than 10% success for H. amygdalina in Thailand (S. Kitamura, unpublished data). Under laboratory conditions, the germination success of nutmeg seeds was relatively high [73]: Gymnacranthera eugeniifolia (88%, N = 100), Knema curtisii (90%, N = 20), K. laurina (98%, N = 150), Myristica crassa (44%, N = 16), Myristica malaccensis (40%, N = 5), and Myristica malaccensis (73%, N = 55), except for Knema scortechinii (8%, N = 50). Removal of the aril before planting was advantageous for K. laurina (98% germination success without arils vs. 20% with arils), but not for Knema furfuracae (100% germination success, N = 50 seeds with arils); thus, the effects of aril removal by frugivores before seed deposition may vary among nutmeg species.

Fate of dispersed seeds

Frugivore activity is difficult to follow in the field, especially for canopy-dwelling animals. One method is to compare the survival and germination of experimentally placed seeds to mimic seed dispersal by frugivores, and another is to follow the fates of seeds dispersed by frugivores in a particular area, such as nest trees of hornbills. In a seed-removal experiment for M. hypargyraea on the ground in Tonga [62], the authors found that most seeds had been removed or killed by rats. Most Myristica seeds predicted to establish (6.5%) were dispersed by D. pacifica, which is more than twice the percentage of undispersed seeds that established (2.9%) around fruiting trees [62].

Hornbill-dispersed seeds around hornbill nests and roost trees were not particularly suitable for seed establishment and recruitment in general [47, 747576]. In India, for example, hornbill-dispersed seeds of H. kingii around nest trees mostly died due to high seed predation by porcupines [77]. At the same site, H. kingii did not recruit near parent trees and showed increased seed mortality by seed-eating mammals with increasing seed density [78]. Hornbill-dispersed seeds of H. amygdalina were often consumed before germination at hornbill nest and roost trees in Thailand [74, 75], but some seedlings survived over 32 months (S. Kitamura, unpublished data). In Sulawesi, seedlings of Horsfieldia brachiata were one of the five most common seedling species around the nesting trees of the red-knobbed hornbill Rhyticeros cassidix [76]. Most nutmeg seeds with high seed density are likely to be eaten and consequently die before germination, but some seeds scattered by birds are likely to germinate and survive at their deposited sites, indicating their qualitative effectiveness as seed dispersers for Myristicaceae.

Summary and future directions

Many studies have reported nutmeg consumption by various kinds of frugivores in the Asia-Pacific region. Currently available data suggest that large, canopy-dwelling birds, including hornbills and pigeons, may function as major seed-dispersal agents for the Myristicaceae. Of these, the potential of hornbills as seed dispersers for large-seeded plants is well documented [31, 79]. Moreover, these birds originated in the mid-Eocene and might have assisted in the rapid colonization of large-seeded plants, including the Myristicaceae [80]. Some nutmeg seeds dispersed by hornbills germinated and survived as seedlings for several years. Based on the results summarized here, hornbills provide excellent seed-dispersal services to the Myristicaceae in this region.

Hornbills are extensively hunted by humans for their beaks, feathers, casque, and meat, and the densities and species richness of many hornbill species have now been reduced at many sites in this region [79, 8182838485]. We expect that in areas in which the diversity of frugivores, particularly large avian frugivores like hornbills, has been reduced, macaques, civets, and squirrels may be the only remaining seed-dispersal agents for nutmeg trees. Indeed, some large-seeded Myristica trees are showing evidence of the lack of dispersal agents in Singapore [12, 86] and Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia (K. Kimura, personal communication); hornbills have vanished or are nearly extinct at these sites, and other large frugivores, such as imperial pigeons (Ducula spp.), are very rare. In a Malaysian forest in Pasoh where at least six species of hornbills were originally distributed [87], only pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) and several species of Callosciurus squirrels visited nutmeg trees in the canopy (M. Yasuda, personal communication). Can nutmeg trees still be dispersed by these remaining frugivores? We could not find detailed data on fruit removal for most nutmeg species in this region; thus, this question is still difficult to answer. Recent studies of other tree species in this region have revealed that frugivores that service the same plant may differ greatly in seed-dispersal effectiveness [88, 89]; therefore, similar results are expected in Myristicaceae.

Current studies on nutmeg-frugivore interactions typically focus on frugivory by certain groups of frugivores, whereas few studies quantify their effectiveness as seed dispersers for Myristicaceae. Thus, evaluating the effect of dispersal loss for this tree family in this region remains challenging. We suggest the following recommendations for future research on seed dispersal of these trees in this region. First, more information must be collected on the natural history of the dispersal ecology of the Myristicaceae. The most obvious natural history gap concerns fruit removal by each frugivore group at fruiting trees. Without such data, the effectiveness of nutmeg consumers as seed dispersers cannot be quantified. Second, many frugivores consume fallen fruits on the ground [6, 58, 90], and some potentially act as secondary dispersers for large-seeded plants [61, 919293]. Although available data suggest that nutmeg seeds are often eaten by rodents on the ground [62, 77, 78], understanding the roles of these secondary dispersers that are tolerant of anthropogenic changes is becoming increasingly important. Third, comparative studies are needed of the dispersal ecology of sympatric nutmeg species with different seed sizes at a range of sites representing major forest types and a variety of human impacts. Nutmeg species with small seeds are expected to be dispersed by a broad assemblage of frugivores, and declines in seed removal by large frugivores might be compensated for by increases in seed removal by small frugivores. In addition, genetic tools can also be used to determine the origin/sources (maternal trees) for established recruitment and trees to determine the seed shadows generated by past and current frugivores.

Nutmeg trees are relatively abundant and well described in the literature, and most species are easily recognized in the field [16]. As elucidated by this review, further studies of nutmeg-frugivore interactions will be of great ecological importance in this region, and the results of future studies will contribute to a general understanding of which evolutionary forces might have shaped current nutmeg-frugivore interactions in tropical forests worldwide.

Acknowledgements

We thank anonymous reviewers, Pierre-Michel Forget, and Simon A. Queenborough for their comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the Mahidol University Government Research Grant, the National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), the Hornbill Research Foundation, and the JSPS Research Fellowships for S.K.

References

1.

Howe, H. F., and Smallwood, J., 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:201–228. Google Scholar

2.

Herrera, C. M., , ed. 2002Seed dispersal by vertebrates. Blackwell Science, Massachusetts. Google Scholar

3.

Turner, I. M., 2001. The ecology of trees in the tropical rain forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

4.

Jordano, P., 2000. Fruits and frugivory. Pp. 125–166 in Fenner, M., (ed.) Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar

5.

Fleming, T. H., Breitwisch, R., and Whitesides, G. H., 1987. Patterns of tropical vertebrate frugivore diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:91–109. Google Scholar

6.

Corlett, R. T., 1998. Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in the Oriental (Indomalayan) Region. Biological Reviews 73:413–448. Google Scholar

7.

Wheelwright, N. T., 1985. Fruit size, gape width, and the diets of fruit-eating birds. Ecology 66:808–818. Google Scholar

8.

McConkey, K. R., and Drake, D. R., 2002. Extinct pigeons and declining bat populations: are large seeds still being dispersed in the tropical Pacific? Pp. 381–395 in Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., and Galetti, M., (eds.) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. CABI Publishing, New York. Google Scholar

9.

Peres, C. A., and van Roosmalen, M., 2002. Primate frugivory in two species-rich Neotropical forests: implications for the demography of large-seeded plants in overhunted areas. Pp. 407–421 in Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., and Galetti, M., (eds.) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. CABI Publishing, New York. Google Scholar

10.

Kitamura, S., Yumoto, T., Poonswad, P., Chuailua, P., Plongmai, K., Maruhashi, T., and Noma, N., 2002. Interactions between fleshy fruits and frugivores in a tropical seasonal forest in Thailand. Oecologia 133:559–572. Google Scholar

11.

Hamann, A., and Curio, E., 1999. Interactions among frugivores and fleshy fruit trees in a Philippine submontane rainforest. Conservation Biology 13:766–773. Google Scholar

12.

Corlett, R. T., 2002. Frugivory and seed dispersal in degraded tropical East Asian landscapes. Pp. 451–465 in Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., and Galetti, M., (eds.) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. CABI Publishing, New York. Google Scholar

13.

Sethi, P., and Howe, H. F., 2009. Recruitment of hornbill-dispersed trees in hunted and logged forests of the Indian Eastern Himalaya. Conservation Biology 23:710–718. Google Scholar

14.

Whitmore, T. C., , ed. 1972Tree Flora of Malaya. Vol. 1. Longman, Kuala Lumpur and London. Google Scholar

15.

De Wilde, W. J. J. O., 2000. Myristicaceae. National Herbarium of the Netherlands, Leiden. Google Scholar

16.

LaFrankie, J. V., 2010. Trees of Tropical Asia: an illustrated guide to diversity. Black Tree Publications, Inc., Bacnotan, Philippines. Google Scholar

17.

Lee, H. S., Davies, S. J., LaFrankie, J. V., Tan, S., Yamakura, T., Itoh, A., Ohkubo, T., and Ashton, P. S., 2002. Dipterocarp forest in Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 14:379–400. Google Scholar

18.

Davies, S. J., Noor, N. S. M., LaFrankie, J. V., and Ashton, P. S., 2003. The Tree of Pasoh Forest: Stand Structure and Floristic Composition of the 50-ha Forest Research Plot. Pp. 35–50 in Okuda, T., Manokaran, N., Matsumoto, Y., Niiyama, K., Thomas, S. C., and Ashton, P. S., (eds.) Pasoh: ecology of a lowland rain forest in Southeast Asia. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar

19.

Slik, J. W. F., Poulsen, A. D., Ashton, P. S., Cannon, C. H., Eichhorn, K. A. O., Kartawinata, K., Lanniari, I., Nagamasu, H., Nakagawa, M., van Nieuwstadt, M. G. L., Payne, J., Purwaningsih Saridan, A., Sidiyasa, K., Verburg, R. W., Webb, C. O., and Wilkie, P., 2003. A floristic analysis of the lowland dipterocarp forests of Borneo. Journal of Biogeography 30:1517–1531. Google Scholar

20.

Howe, H. F., 1981. Dispersal of a Neotropical nutmeg (Virola sebifera) by birds. Auk 98:88–98. Google Scholar

21.

Beehler, B. M., and Dumbacher, J. P., 1996. More examples of fruiting trees visited by predominantly by birds of paradise. Emu 96:81–88. Google Scholar

22.

Sinclair, J., 1958. A revision of the Malayan Myristicaceae Gard. Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 16:205–466. Google Scholar

23.

Ridley, H. N., 1930. The dispersal of plants throughout the world. L. Reeve & Co., Ashford. Google Scholar

24.

Schupp, E. W., 1993. Quantity, quality and the effectiveness of seed dispersal by animals. Vegetatio 108:15–29. Google Scholar

25.

Kitamura, S., Suzuki, S., Yumoto, T., Chuailua, P., Plongmai, K., Poonswad, P., Noma, N., Maruhashi, T., and Suckasam, C., 2005. A botanical inventory of a tropical seasonal forest in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand: implications for fruit-frugivore interactions. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:1241–1262. Google Scholar

26.

De Wilde, W. J. J. O., 2002. Myristicaceae. Pp. 42 in Flora of Thailand. Forest Herbarium, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Bangkok, Thailand. Google Scholar

27.

Bingtao, L., and Wilson, T. K., 2008. Myristicaceae. Pp. 96–101 in Flora of China Vol. 7 (Menispermaceae through Capparaceae). Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. Google Scholar

28.

Mangion, C. P., 2011. Myristicaceae. Pp. 1–5 in Short, P. S., and Cowie, I. D., (eds.) Flora of the Darwin Region. Northern Territory Herbarium, Department of Natural Resources, Environment, the Arts and Sport, Palmerston, N.T. Google Scholar

29.

De Wilde, W. J. J. O., 2006. Myristicacee of Papua. Pp. 408–415 in Marshall, A. J., and Beehler, B. M., (eds.) The ecology of Papua. Periplus Editions, Singapore. Google Scholar

30.

Campos-Arceiz, A., and Blake, S., 2011. Megagardeners of the forest-the role of elephants in seed dispersal. Acta Oecologica 37:542–553. Google Scholar

31.

Kitamura, S., 2011. Frugivory and seed dispersal by hornbills (Bucerotidae) in tropical forests. Acta Oecologica 37:531–541. Google Scholar

32.

Elder, A. A., 2009. Hylobatid diets revisited: The importance of body mass, fruit availability, and interspecific competition. Pp. 133–159 in Lappan, S., and Whittaker, D. J., (eds.) The Gibbons: New perspectives on small ape socioecology and population biology. Springer, New York. Google Scholar

33.

Steinmetz, R., 2011. Ecology an distribution of sympatric Asiatic Black Bears and Sun Bears in the seasonally dry forests of Southeast Asia. Pp. 249–273 in McShea, W. J., Davies, S. J., and Bhumpakphan, N., (eds.) The ecology and conservation of seasonally dry forests in Asia. Washington Institute Scholarly Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Google Scholar

34.

Russon, A. E., Wich, S. A., Ancrenaz, M., Kanamori, T., Knott, C. D., Kuze, N., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., Pratje, P., Ramlee, H., and Rodman, P., 2009. Geographic variation in orangutan diets. Pp. 135–156 in Wich, S. A., Atmoko, Utami S. S., Setia, Mitra T., and van Schaik, C. P., (eds.) Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, New York. Google Scholar

35.

Payne, J. B., 1980. Competitors. Malayan Forest Primates: ten years' study in tropical rain forest:261–277. Google Scholar

36.

Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. K., , eds. 2007Primates in perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Google Scholar

37.

Gibbs, D., Barnes, E., and Cox, J., 2000. Pigeons and doves: a guide to the pigeons and doves of the world. Yale University Press, New Haven & London, UK. Google Scholar

38.

Kemp, A. C., 1995. The hornbills, Bucerotiformes. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

39.

Kemp, A. C., 2001. Family Bucerotidae (Hornbills). Pp. 436–520 in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., and Sargatal, J., (eds.) Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 6. Mousebirds to Hornbills. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

40.

Gupta, A. K., and Chivers, D. J., 1999. Biomass and use of resources in South and South-East Asian primate communities. Pp. 38–54 in Fleagle, J., Janson, C., and Reed, K. E., (eds.) Primate communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

41.

Payne, J., Francis, C. M., and Phillips, K., 1985. A field guide to the mammals of Borneo. The Sabah Society, WWF Malaysia, Kota Kinabaru, Kuala Lumpur. Google Scholar

42.

Wells, D. R., 1999. The Birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula: Vol. 1 Non-passerines. Academic Press, London, UK. Google Scholar

43.

Wells, D. R., 2007. The Birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula: Vol. 2 Passerines. Christopher Helm, London, UK. Google Scholar

44.

Forget, P. M., Dennis, A. J., Mazer, S. J., Jansen, P. A., Kitamura, S., Lambert, J. A., and Westcott, D. A., 2007. Seed allometry and disperser assemblages in tropical rain forests: a comparison of four floras on different continents. Pp. 5–36 in Dennis, A. J., Schupp, E. W., Green, R. J., and Westcott, D. A., (eds.) Seed dispersal: Theory and its application in a changing world. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar

45.

Leighton, M., 1982. Fruit resources and patterns of feeding, spacing and grouping among sympatric Bornean hornbills (Bucerotidae). PhD thesis, University of California, California. Google Scholar

46.

Kannan, R., and James, D. A., 1999. Fruiting phenology and the conservation of the Great Pied Hornbill (Buceros bicornis) in the Western Ghats of southern India. Biotropica 31:167–177. Google Scholar

47.

Datta, A., 2001. An ecological study of sympatric hornbills and fruiting patterns in a tropical forest in Arunachal Pradesh. PhD thesis, Saurashtra University, Rajkot. Google Scholar

48.

Ganesh, T., and Davidar, P., 2005. Fruiting phenology and pre-dispersal seed predation in a rainforest in southern Western Ghats, India. Tropical fruits and frugivores: the search for strong interactors:139–154. Google Scholar

49.

Sharma, M. V., and Shivanna, K. R., 2011. Pollinators, pollination efficiency and fruiting success in a wild nutmeg, Myristica dactyloides. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27:405–412. Google Scholar

50.

Brockelman, W. Y., 2011. Rainfall patterns and unpredictable fruit production in seasonally dry evergreen forest and their effects on gibbons. Pp. 195–216 in McShea, W. J., Davies, S. J., and Bhumpakphan, N., (eds.) The ecology and conservation of seasonally dry forests in Asia. Washington Institute Scholarly Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Google Scholar

51.

Suzuki, S., 2007. Fruit utilization patterns of terrestrial frugivores and the population dynamics of small mammal community in a seasonal tropical forest in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. PhD Thesis, University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Japan (in Japanese). Google Scholar

52.

Plongmai, K., Poonswad, P., Sukkasem, C., and Chuailua, P., 2005. The availability of ripe fruits in the annual hornbill life cycle. Pp. 131–142 in Lum, S., and Poonswad, P., (eds.) The ecology of hornbills: reproduction and populations. Pimdee Karnpim Co. Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand. Google Scholar

53.

Hamann, A., 2004. Flowering and fruiting phenology of a Philippine submontane rain forest: climatic factors as proximate and ultimate causes. Journal of Ecology 92:24–31. Google Scholar

54.

Armstrong, J. E., and Irvine, A. K., 1989. Flowering, sex ratios, pollen-ovule ratios, fruit set, and reproductive effort of a dioecious tree, Myristica insipida (Myristicaceae), in two different rain forest communities. American Journal of Botany 76:74–85. Google Scholar

55.

Brearley, F. Q., Proctor, J., Suriantata Nagy, L., Dalrymple, G., and Voysey, B. C., 2007. Reproductive phenology over a 10-year period in a lowland evergreen rain forest of central Borneo. Journal of Ecology 95:828–839. Google Scholar

56.

Sakai, S., Momose, K., Yumoto, T., Nagamitsu, T., Nagamasu, H., Hamid, A. A., and Nakashizuka, T., 1999. Plant reproductive phenology over four years including an episode of general flowering in a lowland dipterocarp forest, Sarawak, Malaysia. American Journal of Botany 86:1414–1436. Google Scholar

57.

Kitamura, S., Thong-Aree, S., Madsri, S., and Poonswad, P., 2011. Characteristics of hornbill-dispersed fruits in dipterocarp forests of southern Thailand. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology S24:137–147. Google Scholar

58.

Yasuda, M., Miura, S., Ishii, N., Okuda, T., and Hussein, N. A., 2005. Fallen fruits and terrestrial vertebrate frugivores: a case study in a lowland tropical rain forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Pp. 151–174 in Forget, P. M., Lambert, J. E., Hulme, P. E., and Wall, Vander S. B., (eds.) Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. Google Scholar

59.

Kanwatanakid-Savini, C., Poonswad, P., and Savini, T., 2009. An assessment of food overlap between gibbons and hornbills. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 57:189–198. Google Scholar

60.

Kitamura, S., Suzuki, S., Yumoto, T., Poonswad, P., Chuailua, P., Plongmai, K., Maruhashi, T., Noma, N., and Suckasam, C., 2006. Dispersal of Canarium euphyllum (Burseraceae), a large-seeded tree species, in a moist evergreen forest in Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22:137–146. Google Scholar

61.

Kitamura, S., Suzuki, S., Yumoto, T., Poonswad, P., Chuailua, P., Plongmai, K., Noma, N., Maruhashi, T., and Suckasam, C., 2004. Dispersal of Aglaia spectabilis, a large-seeded tree species in a moist evergreen forest in Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20:421–427. Google Scholar

62.

Meehan, H. J., McConkey, K. R., and Drake, D. R., 2005. Early fate of Myristica hypargyraea seeds dispersed by Ducula pacifica in Tonga, Western Polynesia. Austral Ecology 30:374–382. Google Scholar

63.

Suryadi, S., Kinnaird, M. F., O'Brien, T. G., Supriatna, J., and Somadikarta, S., 1994. Food preferences of the Sulawesi red-knobbed hornbill during the non-breeding season. Tropical Biodiversity 2:377–384. Google Scholar

64.

McConkey, K. R., and Chivers, D. J., 2007. Influence of gibbon ranging patterns on seed dispersal distance and deposition site in a Bornean forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23:269–275. Google Scholar

65.

Tsujino, R., and Yumoto, T., 2009. Topography-specific seed dispersal by Japanese macaques in a lowland forest on Yakushima Island, Japan. Journal of Animal Ecology 78:119–125. Google Scholar

66.

Nakashima, Y., and Sukor, J. A., 2010. Importance of common palm civets (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus) as a long-distance disperser for large-seeded plants in degraded forests. Tropics 18:221–229. Google Scholar

67.

Yumoto, T., Noma, N., and Maruhashi, T., 1998. Cheek-pouch dispersal of seeds by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata yakui) on Yakushima Island, Japan. Primates 39:325–338. Google Scholar

68.

Terakawa, M., Isagi, Y., Matsui, K., and Yumoto, T., 2009. Microsatellite analysis of the maternal origin of Myrica rubra seeds in the feces of Japanese macaques. Ecological Research 24:663–670. Google Scholar

69.

Becker, P., and Wong, M., 1985. Seed dispersal, seed predation, and juvenile mortality of Aglaia sp. (Meliaceae) in lowland dipterocarp rainforest. Biotropica 17:230–237. Google Scholar

70.

McConkey, K. R., Meehan, H. J., and Drake, D. R., 2004. Seed dispersal by Pacific Pigeons (Ducula pacifica) in Tonga, Western Polynesia. Emu 104:369–376. Google Scholar

71.

Whitington, C., 1990. Seed dispersal by white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Google Scholar

72.

Lucas, P. W., and Corlett, R. T., 1998. Seed dispersal by long-tailed macaques. American Journal of Primatology 45:29–44. Google Scholar

73.

Ng, F. S. P., 1980. Germination ecology of Malaysian woody plants. Malaysian Forester 43:406–437. Google Scholar

74.

Kitamura, S., Yumoto, T., Noma, N., Chuailua, P., Maruhashi, T., Wohandee, P., and Poonswad, P., 2008. Aggregated seed dispersal by wreathed hornbills at a roost site in a moist evergreen forest of Thailand. Ecological Research 23:943–952. Google Scholar

75.

Kitamura, S., Yumoto, T., Poonswad, P., Noma, N., Chuailua, P., Plongmai, K., Maruhashi, T., and Suckasam, C., 2004. Pattern and impact of hornbill seed dispersal at nest trees in a moist evergreen forest in Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20:545–553. Google Scholar

76.

Kinnaird, M. F., 1998. Evidence for effective seed dispersal by the Sulawesi red-knobbed hornbill, Aceros cassidix. Biotropica 30:50–55. Google Scholar

77.

Velho, N., Datta, A., and Isvaran, K., 2009. Effect of rodents on seed fate of five hornbill-dispersed tree species in a tropical forest in north-east India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25:507–514. Google Scholar

78.

Velho, N., Isvaran, K., and Datta, A., 2012. Rodent seed predation: effects on seed survival, recruitment, abundance, and dispersion of bird-dispersed tropical trees. Oecologia:in press. Google Scholar

79.

Kinnaird, M. F., and O'Brien, T. G., 2007. The ecology and conservation of Asian hornbills: farmers of the forest. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

80.

Viseshakul, N., Charoennitikul, W., Kitamura, S., Kemp, A., Thong-Aree, S., Surapunpitak, Y., Poonswad, P., and Ponglikitmongkol, M., 2011. A phylogeny of frugivorous hornbills linked to the evolution of Indian plants within Asian rainforests. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24:1533–1545. Google Scholar

81.

Pattanavibool, A., and Dearden, P., 2002. Fragmentation and wildlife in montane evergreen forests, northern Thailand. Biological Conservation 107:155–164. Google Scholar

82.

Datta, A., 1998. Hornbill abundance in unlogged forest, selectively logged forest and a forest plantation in Arunchal Pradesh, India. Oryx 32:285–294. Google Scholar

83.

Johns, A. D., 1987. The use of primary and selectively logged rain-forest by Malaysian hornbills (Bucerotidae) and implications for their conservation. Biological Conservation 40:179–190. Google Scholar

84.

Johns, A. D., 1985. Selective logging and wildlife conservation in tropical rain-forest: problems and recommendations. Biological Conservation 31:355–375. Google Scholar

85.

Gonzalez, J. C. T., 2011. Enumerating the ethno-ornithological importance of Philippine hornbills. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology S24:149–161. Google Scholar

86.

Ercelawn, A. C., La Frankie, I. V., Lum, S. K. Y., and Lee, S. K., 1998. Short-term recruitment of trees in a forest fragment in Singapore. Tropics 8:105–115. Google Scholar

87.

Francis, C. M., and Wells, D. R., 2003. The Birds Community at Pasoh: Composition and Population Dynamics. Pp. 375–393 in Okuda, T., Manokaran, N., Matsumoto, Y., Niiyama, K., Thomas, S. C., and Ashton, P. S., (eds.) Pasoh: ecology of a lowland rain forest in Southeast Asia. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar

88.

Brodie, J. F., Helmy, O. E., Brockelman, W. Y., and Maron, J. L., 2009. Functional differences within a guild of tropical mammalian frugivores. Ecology 90:688–698. Google Scholar

89.

McConkey, K. R., and Brockelman, W. Y., 2011. Nonredundancy in the dispersal network of a generalist tropical forest tree. Ecology 92:1492–1502. Google Scholar

90.

Prasad, S., Pittet, A., and Sukumar, R., 2010. Who really ate the fruit? A novel approach to camera trapping for quantifying frugivory by ruminants. Ecological Research 25:225–231. Google Scholar

91.

Yasuda, M., Miura, M., and Hussein, N. A., 2000. Evidence for food hoarding behaviour in terrestrial rodents in Pasoh forest reserve, a Malaysian lowland rain forest. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 12:164–173. Google Scholar

92.

Kitamura, S., Yumoto, T., Poonswad, P., Suzuki, S., and Wohandee, P., 2008. Rare seed-predating mammals determine seed fate of Canarium euphyllum, a large-seeded tree species in a moist evergreen forest, Thailand. Ecological Research 23:169–177. Google Scholar

93.

Cao, L., Xiao, Z., Guo, C., and Chen, J., 2011. Scatter-hoarding rodents as secondary seed dispersers of a frugivore-dispersed tree Scleropyrum wallichianum in a defaunated Xishuangbanna tropical forest, China. Integrative Zoology 6:227–234. Google Scholar

94.

Wich, S. A., Atmoko, S. S. U., and Setia, T. M., , eds. 2009Orangutans: geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, USA. Google Scholar

95.

Whitten, A. J., 1982. Diet and feeding-behavior of kloss gibbons on Siberut island, Indonesia. Folia Primatologica 37:177–208. Google Scholar

96.

Kinnaird, M. F., and O'Brien, T. G., 1993. Preliminary observation on the breeding biology of the endemic Sulawesi red-knobbed hornbill (Rhyticeros cassidix). Tropical Biodiversity 1:107–112. Google Scholar

97.

Chimchome, V., Vidhidharm, A., Simchareon, S., Bumrungsri, S., and Poonswad, P., 1998. Comparative study of the breeding biology and ecology of two endangered hornbill species in Huai Kha Khaeng wildlife sanctuary, Thailand. The Asian hornbills: ecology and conservation, Thai Studies in Biodiversity No 2:111–131. Google Scholar

98.

Kitamura, S., Yumoto, T., Poonswad, P., Chuailua, P., and Plongmai, K., 2004. Characteristics of hornbill-dispersed fruits in a tropical seasonal forest in Thailand. Bird Conservation International 14:S81–S88. Google Scholar

99.

Hadiprakarsa, Y. Y., and Kinnaird, M. F., 2004. Foraging characteristics of an assemblage of four Sumatran hornbill species. Bird Conservation International 14:S53–S62. Google Scholar

100.

Harrison, M. E., 2009. Orangutan feeding behaviour in Sabangau, Central Kalimantan. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Google Scholar

101.

Supriatna, J., Manullang, B. O., and Soekara, E., 1986. Group composition, home range, and diet of the maroon leaf monkey (Presbytis rubicunda) at Tanjung Puting Reserve, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Primates 27:185–190. Google Scholar

102.

Poirier, F. E., and Smith, E. O., 1974. The Crab-Eating Macaques (Macaca fascicularis) of Angaur Island, Palau, Micronesia. Folia primatol 22:258–306. Google Scholar

103.

Chivers, D. J., , ed. 1980Malayan forest primates: ten years' study in tropical rain forest. Plenum Press, New York, USA. Google Scholar

104.

Gittins, S. P., 1982. Feeding and ranging in the agile gibbon. Folia Primatologica 38:39–71. Google Scholar

105.

Jayasekara, P., Weerasinghe, U. R., Wijesundara, S., and Takatsuki, S., 2007. Identifying diurnal and nocturnal frugivores in the terrestrial and arboreal layers of a tropical rain forest in Sri Lanka. Ecotropica 13:7–15. Google Scholar

106.

Marsden, S. J., and Pilgrim, J. D., 2003. Factors influencing the abundance of parrots and hornbills in pristine and disturbed forests on New Britain, PNG. Ibis 145:45–53. Google Scholar

107.

Datta, A., and Rawat, G. S., 2003. Foraging patterns of sympatric hornbills during the nonbreeding season in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. Biotropica 35:208–218. Google Scholar

108.

Datta, A., and Rawat, G. S., 2008. Dispersal modes and spatial patterns of tree species in a tropical forest in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. Tropical Conservation Science 1:163–185. Google Scholar

109.

Solanki, G. S., Kumar, A., and Sharma, B. K., 2008. Feeding ecology of Trachypithecus pileatus in India. International Journal of Primatology 29:173–182. Google Scholar

110.

Riley, E. P., 2007. Flexibility in diet and activity patterns of Macaca tonkeana in response to anthropogenic habitat alteration. International Journal of Primatology 28:107–133. Google Scholar

111.

Fredriksson, G. M., Wich, S. A., and Trisno 2006. Frugivory in sun bears (Helarctos malayanus) is linked to El Nino related fluctuations in fruiting phenology, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 89:489–508. Google Scholar

112.

Mudappa, D., 2000. Breeding biology of the Malabar Grey Hornbill (Ocyceros griseus) in southern Western Ghats, India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 97:15–24. Google Scholar

113.

Mudappa, D., Kumar, A., and Chellam, R., 2010. Diet and fruit choice of the brown palm civet Paradoxurus jerdoni, a viverrid endemic to the Western Ghats rainforest, India. Tropical Conservation Science 3:282–300. Google Scholar

114.

Punekar, S. A., 2002. Some food plants of Hanuman langur Semnopithecus entellus (Dufresne) in the western Ghats of Maharashtra, India. ZOOS'PRINT JOURNAL 17:797–801. Google Scholar

115.

Umapathy, G., and Kumar, A., 2000. Impacts of the habitat fragmentation on time budget and feeding ecology lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) in rain forest fragments of Anamalai Hills, South India. Primate report 58:67–82. Google Scholar

116.

Farida, W. R., and Harun 2000. The diversity of plants and feed resources for the Java Gibbon (Hylobates moloch), Grizzled Langur (Presbytis comata), and Silver Langur (Trachypithecus auratus) in Gunung Halimun National Park. Jurnal of Primatologi Indonesia 3:55–61. Google Scholar

117.

Bartlett, T. Q., 1999. Feeding and ranging behavior of the white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Google Scholar

118.

Srikosamatara, S., 1984. Ecology of pileated gibbons in south-east Thailand. Pp. 242–257 in Preuschoft, H., Chivers, D. J., Brockelman, W. Y., and Creel, N., (eds.) The Lesser Apes: Evolutionary and. Behavioural Biology. Edinburgh. Google Scholar

119.

Whitington, C., and Treesucon, U., 1991. Selection and treatment of food plants by white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 39:111–122. Google Scholar

120.

Leighton, M., 1993. Modeling dietary selectivity by Bornean orangutans: Evidence for integration of multiple criteria in fruit selection. International Journal of Primatology 14:257–313. Google Scholar

121.

Lucas, P. W., and Corlett, R. T., 1991. Relationship between the diet of Macaca fascicularis and forest phenology. Folia Primatologica 57:201–215. Google Scholar

122.

McConkey, K. R., Aldy, F., Ario, A., and Chivers, D. J., 2002. Selection of fruit by gibbons (Hylobates muelleri × agilis) in the rain forests of Central Borneo. International Journal of Primatology 23:123–145. Google Scholar

123.

Kanamori, T., Kuze, N., Bernard, H., Malim, T. P., and Kohshima, S., 2010. Feeding ecology of Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus morio) in Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia: a 3-year record including two mast fruitings. American Journal of Primatology 72:820–840. Google Scholar

124.

Ouithavon, K., Poonswad, P., Bhumbhakpan, N., and Laohajinda, V., 2005. A comparative study of the feeding ecology of two sympatric Hornbill species (Aves: Bucerotidae) during their breeding season in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Pp. 59–73 in Lum, S., and Poonswad, P., (eds.) The ecology of hornbills: reproduction and populations. Pimdee Karnpim Co. Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand. Google Scholar

125.

Ouithavon, K., Poonswad, P., Bhumbhakpan, N., and Laohajinda, V., 2005. Some characteristics of food of two sympatric hornbill species (Aves: Bucerotidae) and fruit availability during their breeding season in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Pp. 75–85 in Lum, S., and Poonswad, P., (eds.) The ecology of hornbills: reproduction and populations. Pimdee Karnpim Co. Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand. Google Scholar

126.

Ungar, P. S., 1995. Fruit preferences of four sympatric primate species at Ketambe, Northern Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology 16:221–245. Google Scholar

127.

Ali, S., and Ripley, S. D., 1969. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan. Vol 3. Oxford University Press, London, UK. Google Scholar

128.

Kauth, M., Engel, S., Lastimoza, L. L., and Curio, E., 1998. Observations on the breeding biology of the Writhed-billed Hornbill (Aceros waldeni) in the Philippines. Journal Fur Ornithologie 139:475–483. Google Scholar

129.

Ganesh, T., 2004. Seed predation and seed removal rates in Myristica dactylodes in southern India. Workshop on seed dispersal & frugivory in Asia:11. Google Scholar

130.

Umapathy, G., 1998. Impacts of habitat fragmentation on the arboreal mammals in the wet evergreen forests of the Anamalai Hills in the Western Ghats, south India. PhD thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore. Google Scholar

131.

Mack, A. L., and Wright, D. D., 1996. Notes on occurrence and feeding of birds at Crater Mountain Biological Research Station, Papua New Guinea. Emu 96:89–101. Google Scholar

132.

Collar, N. J., Crosby, R., and Crosby, M. J., , eds. 2001Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife International red data book. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

133.

McConkey, K. R., Drake, D. R., Meehan, H. J., and Parsons, N., 2003. Husking stations provide evidence of seed predation by introduced rodents in Tongan rain forests. Biological Conservation 109:221–225. Google Scholar

134.

Crome, F. H. J., 1975. The ecology of fruit pigeons in tropical northern Queensland. Australian Wildlife Research 2:155–185. Google Scholar

135.

Ali, S., and Ripley, S. D., 1970. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan. Vol 4. Oxford University Press, London, UK. Google Scholar

136.

Beehler, B., 1983. Frugivory and polygamy in birds of paradise. Auk 100:1–11. Google Scholar

137.

Palombit, R. A., 1997. Inter- and intraspecific variation in the diets of sympatric siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) and lar gibbons (Hylobates lar). Folia Primatologica 68:321–337. Google Scholar

138.

Smythies, B. E., 1960. The birds of Borneo. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK. Google Scholar

139.

Aziz, M. A., and Feeroz, M. M., 2009. Utilization of forest flora by Phayre's Leaf-Monkey Trachypithecus phayrei (Primates: Cercopithecidae) in semi-evergreen forests of Bangladesh. Journal of Threatened Taxa 1:257–262. Google Scholar

140.

Bleisch, W. V., and Chen, N., 1991. Ecology and behavior of wild black-crested gibbons (Hylobates concolor) in China with a reconsideration of evidence for polygyny. Primates 32:539–548. Google Scholar

141.

Dela, J., 2007. Seasonal food use strategies of a colobine frugivore, Trachypithecus vetulus nestor, at Panadura and Piliyandala, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Primatology 28:607–626. Google Scholar

142.

Duc, H. M., Baxter, G. S., and Page, M. J., 2009. Diet of Pygathrix nigripes in southern Vietnam. International Journal of Primatology 30:15–28. Google Scholar

143.

Fan, P., Ni, Q., Sun, G., Huang, B., and Jiang, X., 2009. Gibbons under seasonal stress: the diet of the black crested gibbon (Nomascus concolor) on Mt. Wuliang, Central Yunnan, China. Primates 50:37–44. Google Scholar

144.

Frith, H. J., Crome, F. H. J., and Wolfe, T. O., 1976. Food of fruit-pigeons in New Guinea. Emu 76:49–58. Google Scholar

145.

Fuentes, A., 1996. Feeding and ranging in the Mentawai Island langur (Presbytis potenziani). International Journal of Primatology 17:525–548. Google Scholar

146.

Goodwin, D., 1977. Pigeons and doves of the world. British Museum (Natural History), London, UK. Google Scholar

147.

Grueter, C. C., Da-Yong, L. I., Shun-Kai, F., and Bao-Ping, R. E. N., 2010. Niche partitioning between sympatric rhesus macaques and Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys at Baimaxueshan Nature Reserve, China. Zoological Research 5:516–522. Google Scholar

148.

Gurmaya, K. J., 1986. Ecology and behavior of Presbytis thomasi in Northern Sumatra. Primates 27:151–172. Google Scholar

149.

Islam, M. A., and Feeroz, M. M., 1992. Ecology of hoolock gibbon of Bangladesh. Primates 33:451–464. Google Scholar

150.

Kool, K. M., 1993. The diet and feeding behavior of the silver leaf monkey (Trachypithecus auratus sondaicus) in Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology 14:667–700. Google Scholar

151.

Krishnamani, R., 1994. Diet composition of the bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata) in a tropical dry evergreen forest of southern India. Tropical Biodiversity 2:285. Google Scholar

152.

Kumar, A., and Solanki, G. S., 2008. Population status and conservation of capped langurs (Trachypithecus pileatus) in and around Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Primate Conservation 23:97–105. Google Scholar

153.

Kumar, R. S., Mishra, C., and Sinha, A., 2007. Foraging ecology and time-activity budget of the Arunachal macaque Macaca munzala: A preliminary study. Current Science 93:532–539. Google Scholar

154.

Le Khac Quyet, N. A. D., Tai, V. A., Wright, B. W., and Covert, H. H., 2007. Diet of the Tonkin snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus avunculus) in the Khau Ca area, Ha Giang Province, northeastern Vietnam. Vietnamese Journal of Primatology 1:75–83. Google Scholar

155.

Li, Z. Y., and Rogers, M. E., 2006. Food items consumed by white-headed langurs in Fusui, China. International Journal of Primatology 27:1551–1567. Google Scholar

156.

Matsuda, I., Tuuga, A., and Higashi, S., 2009. The feeding ecology and activity budget of proboscis monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 71:478–492. Google Scholar

157.

Minhas, R. A., Ahmed, K. B., Awan, M. S., and Dar, N. I., 2010. Habitat utilization and feeding biology of Himalayan Grey Langur (Semnopithecus entellus ajex) in Machiara National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Zoological Research 2:177–188. Google Scholar

158.

O'Brien, T. G., and Kinnaird, M. F., 1997. Behavior, diet, and movements of the Sulawesi crested black macaque (Macaca nigra). International Journal of Primatology 18:321–351. Google Scholar

159.

Rawson, B. M., 2009. The socio-ecology of the black-shanked douc (Pygathrix nigripes) in Mondulkiri Province, Cambodia. School of Archaeology and Anthropology:211. Google Scholar

160.

Su, H. H., and Lee, L. L., 2001. Food habits of Formosan rock macaques (Macaca cyclopis) in Jentse, northeastern Taiwan, assessed by fecal analysis and behavioral observation. International Journal of Primatology 22:359–377. Google Scholar

161.

Workman, C., 2010. The foraging ecology of the Delacour's langur (Trachypithecus delacouri) in Van Long Nature Reserve, Vietnam. Department of Evolutionary anthropology:235. Google Scholar

162.

Wu, J.-P., Zhou, W., Zhou, J.-L., Ai, H.-S., Huang, X.-X., and Li, J.-H., 2009. Diet and daily feeding amount of Hoolock Gibbon (Hoolock hoolock) at Nankang, Mt. Gaoligong Zoological Research 30:539–544. Google Scholar

163.

Zhang, X.-X., Zhou, W., Wu, J.-P., Bai, B., Li, Z.-B., and Li, J.-H., 2008. Food selection of Hoolock Gibbon (Hoolock hoolock) at Nankang, Mt. Gaoligong in spring. Zoological Research 29:174–180. Google Scholar

164.

Zhou, Q., Wei, F., Li, M., Huang, C., and Luo, B., 2006. Diet and food choice of Trachypithecus francoisi in the Nonggang Nature Reserve, China. International Journal of Primatology 27:1441–1460. Google Scholar

165.

Zhou, Q., Wei, H., Huang, Z., and Hunag, C., 2011. Diet of the Assamese macaque Macaca assamensis in limestone habitats of Nonggang, China. Current Zoology 57:18–25. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Nutmeg-frugivore interactions in the Asia-Pacific region.

10.1177_194008291300600503-table2.tif
© 2013 Shumpei Kitamura and Pilai Poonswad. This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ - The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and source of the work. The license ensures that the published article will be as widely available as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers.
Shumpei Kitamura and Pilai Poonswad "Nutmeg-vertebrate interactions in the Asia-Pacific region: importance of frugivores for Seed dispersal in Myristicaceae," Tropical Conservation Science 6(5), 608-636, (11 November 2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600503
Received: 19 September 2012; Accepted: 21 May 2013; Published: 11 November 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
29 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top