Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
20 March 2015 Distribution and conservation status of Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae) in the state of Veracruz, Mexico
Samaria Armenta-Montero, César I. Carvajal-Hernández, Edward A. Ellis, Thorsten Krömer
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The fern and lycophyte flora of Mexico contains 13 species in the genus Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae; club moss family), of which nine are found in the state of Veracruz (P. cuernavacensis, P. dichotomus, P. linifolius, P. myrsinites, P. orizabae, P. pithyoides, P. pringlei, P. reflexus, P. taxifolius). They are located primarily in undisturbed areas of humid montane, pine-oak and tropical humid forests, which are all ecosystems threatened by deforestation and fragmentation. The objective of this study was to evaluate and understand the distribution and conservation status of species of this genus in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. Using Maxent, probability distributions were modeled based on 173 herbarium specimens (25% from recent collections by the authors and/or collaborators), considering factors such as climate, elevation and vegetation cover. Additionally, anthropogenic impacts on the original habitat of each species were analyzed in order to assign threatened categories based on IUCN classifications at regional levels. Results show that potential distributions are located in the montane regions of the central and southern parts of the state. All nine Phlegmariurus species in Veracruz were found to be in some category of risk, with P. orizabae classified as critically endangered, having only a single specimen collected in 1854. The main reasons for species threats are the continuous loss and fragmentation of their natural habitat, uncontrolled harvesting activities, and the lack of protected areas that include humid montane and pine-oak forests in the central region of the state.

Introduction

The Lycopodiaceae (club mosses) is a cosmopolitan family of about 430 homosporous lycophytes (including 185 Neotropical species) in which the species exhibit shoot-forms correlated with habitat [1234]. Until recently, the most widely adopted four-genus classification of Øllgaard [5] recognized Lycopodium L., Lycopodiella Holub, Huperzia Bernh., and Phylloglossum Kunze. However, recent molecular phylogenetic investigations of the family have shown that Huperzia is paraphyletic [6]. Thus, Phlegmariurus Holub is now recognized as a genus sister of Huperzia [7, 8] and includes a broad spectrum of mostly epiphytic species with pendulous sporophyllous shoots lacking gemmae. Phlegmariurus occurs primarily in tropical and subtropical regions, whereas Huperzia sensu stricto, of Wagner and Beitel [9] includes only terrestrial species with erect shoots bearing gemmae in leaf axils [2].

The fern and lycophyte flora in Mexico comprises 13 species in the genus Phlegmariurus, of which nine species are found in the state of Veracruz [10, 11]. They are generally distributed in undisturbed zones of humid montane, pine-oak and tropical humid forests [10]. In Mexico as well as in Veracruz, these ecosystems are being reduced and degraded by deforestation and land use change for the establishment of agricultural and pasture land [12]. This impacts natural habitats and reduces species richness and populations of vascular plants in general, including fern and lycophytes and the Phlegmariurus species in particular. Species of this genus have been found to be absent or rare in disturbed humid montane and secondary forests, remnant trees, and coffee plantations in central Veracruz [13141516]. This rarity or absence is because of the general dependence of vascular epiphytes on mature host canopy trees, and also their vulnerability to changes in micro-climate to the drier and warmer conditions present in disturbed and secondary forests [171819].

Moreover, some of the Phlegmariurus species are being harvested from their natural habitat and sold in local markets of Veracruz and other states like Oaxaca for ornamental purposes [20, 21]. In general, species of Phlegmariurus in Mexico are very poorly represented in regional or national herbaria, and some species are represented by only a few specimens collected decades ago, as is the case with P. cuernavacensis and P. orizabae in Veracruz [10, 22]. The lack of knowledge about their distribution suggests that most of them are rare species of conservation concern. According to a preliminary evaluation by Tejero-Díez et al. [11], all Phlegmariurus species are classified under a risk category, despite the fact that in the official Mexican Red List only one species (P. dichotomus) is classified as threatened [23].

Our objective was to learn with more detail the distribution of Phlegmariurus species in order to determine their conservation status, comparing their actual and potential distribution in Veracruz. In this study we modeled the potential distribution of species in the genus for the state, using the Maxent software based on herbarium samples, as well as considering climatic factors, elevation, and vegetation cover. Furthermore, anthropogenic impact on the natural habitat of the species was evaluated in order to assign a threatened category according to their conservation status, using the IUCN criteria at regional levels [24, 25].

Methods

Study area

The state of Veracruz has a total area of ca.72,000 km2, divided into 212 municipalities [26]. It is located in eastern Mexico along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico in a transition zone between two biogeographic regions: Nearctic and Neotropical [27]. Its geography encompasses two extensive coastal plains broken up by four important mountain ranges: i) the Sierra Madre Oriental, which contains the Sierra de Huayacocotla in the northern portion of the state; ii) the Eje Neovolcánico, with two of the highest peaks in Mexico, Pico de Orizaba (5,610 m) and Cofre de Perote (4,280 m); iii) the Sierra de Los Tuxtlas in the southern part of the state, with elevations up to 1,700 m; and iv) the Sierra Madre del Sur, which in its northwestern portion forms the Sierra de Zongolica, with elevations up to 2,500 m [28] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Map of Veracruz and bordering states, Mexico, indicating Otontepec, Huayacocotla, Los Tuxtlas and Uxpanapa area, as well as the central montane region around the capital city of Xalapa, as relevant areas for the distribution of Phlegmariurus species.

10.1177_194008291500800111-fig1.tif

The heterogeneous geomorphology of Veracruz creates a wide variety of climate types, from warm tropical-dry to cold temperate-humid climates [29]. This variety of climates and the montane terrain delimit the presence of 19 vegetation types, including humid montane, pine-oak and tropical humid forests, which are considered the most diverse ecosystems in Mexico [30]. The combination of the above factors places Veracruz among the three most biodiverse states in the country, with a vascular flora of close to 7,800 species [30], of which about 570 species are ferns and lycophytes [31, 32].

Fig. 2.

Phlegmariurus species of Veracruz: a) Detail of P. myrsinites, b) P. pringlei in habitat, c) P. taxifolius in habitat, d) Type specimen of P. orizabae (image courtesy of the C. V. Starr Virtual Herbarium of The New York Botanical Garden), e) P. linifolius sold in a gift shop, f) P. pringlei and P. taxifolius sold at a local market in Xalapa.

10.1177_194008291500800111-fig2.tif

Database

The present study is based on the revision of 260 herbarium specimens (including duplicates in several herbaria) and high resolution digital photographs of all nine Phlegmariurus species (P. cuernavacensis, P. dichotomus, P. linifolius, P. myrsinites, P. orizabae, P. pithyoides, P. pringlei, P. reflexus, P. taxifolius; Fig. 2) recorded for the state of Veracruz, Mexico, which were deposited in a total of 13 herbaria (Table 1). Of a total of 173 revised collections (Appendix 1), including 25% recent collections by the authors and/or collaborators, the following data were obtained from the specimen labels: species (the correct taxonomic determination was confirmed for each revised specimen), information on the collector, collection number, determiner, municipality, locality, elevation, date, habitat, life form, latitude, longitude, size, and abundance. The collection years of the specimens range from 1828 to 2014, which were grouped into five periods (modified from Zizka et al. [33]): i) 1828 to 1920; ii) 1921 to 1965; iii) 1966 to 1985; iv) 1986 to 2000; and v) recent collections from 2001 to 2014. This was done with the goal of identifying the temporality and intensity of species collections during these periods, and based on these parameters, be able to characterize species distributions and rarity, as well as to evaluate the threats through time.

Geographic distribution at global, state, and municipality levels in Veracruz, as well as the vegetation type and the elevational range where species occur in Veracruz are listed for each species. A single voucher specimen is cited for each municipality.

Table 1.

Information on consulted herbaria and the number of revised specimens of Phlegmariurus species collected in the state of Veracruz, Mexico (41 of these with duplicates in several herbaria).

10.1177_194008291500800111-table1.tif

Potential distribution

The Maxent v.3.3 model was used [34] to obtain the potential distribution of the Phlegmariurus species in Veracruz. This model is based on a statistical approximation called maximum entropy, which formulates predictions using incomplete information, in this case data on the presence of the species to estimate its potential distribution [3435]. The coordinates of the localities of each collected specimen are an important factor in this study; for specimens that lacked this information it was therefore necessary to derive an approximation based on location data described on the label. Ten of the previously collected specimens were not considered in this analysis, (marked with the “?” symbol under “Representative specimens from Veracruz”), due to their locality being doubtful and the inability to assign reliable coordinates. Moreover, it was impossible to estimate potential distribution of P. orizabae since there was only a single known specimen.

Spatial data used for the Maxent model included land use and vegetation cover at 1:250,000 scale [36]. In addition, we used twenty climate data variables from the BioClim database of WorldClim [37]: altitude, annual mean temperature, mean of monthly maximum and minimum temperature, isothermality, temperature seasonality, maximum temperature of warmest month, minimum temperature of coldest month, temperature annual range, mean temperature of wettest quarter, mean temperature of driest quarter, mean temperature of warmest quarter, mean temperature of coldest quarter, annual precipitation, precipitation of wettest month, precipitation of driest month, precipitation seasonality, precipitation of wettest quarter, precipitation of driest quarter, precipitation of warmest quarter and precipitation of coldest quarter. All spatial data layers were converted to ASCII format using the software ArcGIS Ver 9.3 of ESRI®. AUC values are used to describe model performance or predictive accuracy.

Conservation status

The classification of conservation status is based on the categories and criteria proposed in the IUCN Red List at regional levels [24, 25]: Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN), Vulnerable (VU), Near Threatened (NT), and Least Concern (LC). These categories were assigned based on our extensive database, as well as land use and land cover data [32] from Semarnat [38] and Ellis et al. [12], which use Landsat imagery to evaluate land use and forest cover change within two time periods (1990 and 2000). Additionally, we consulted national level results on anthropogenic threats to different vegetation types and their implications on biodiversity loss [39]. Our evaluation is reinforced by information presented by CONABIO [40], which characterizes the issue of humid montane forest loss in Mexico.

The considerable recent collections made by the authors and/or collaborators, together with own observations in the field, support our ability to assess the conservation status of Phlegmariurus species in Veracruz, which also requires field experience. The information generated by Maxent was useful in reinforcing our conclusions and proposals for conservation of species.

Starting from the label information for each herbarium specimen, we calculated for each species the Area of Occupancy (AOO), defined as the area of suitable habitat currently occupied by the taxon, excluding cases of vagrancy [41]. Furthermore, considering the potential distribution modeled by Maxent, we estimated the Extent of Occurrence (EOO), defined as the area contained within the shortest continuous imaginary boundary which can be drawn to encompass all the known, inferred or projected sites of present occurrence of a taxon, excluding cases of vagrancy [41]. These two measurements represent different aspects of geographical range size: AOO provides information on the area of suitable habitat, whereas EOO provides information on overall geographical spread [42, 43].

The surface area for AOO and EOO was obtained from the vegetation and land use cover layer [36] using ArcGIS 9.3. Although we assume that we have the best available database to assess conservation status of Phlegmariurus species from Veracruz based on geographic distribution, a detailed survey of population level is lacking for all of them. The distribution area in km2 was therefore compared with IUCN criterion B (Geographical Distribution), which allows a species to qualify as threatened when its geographic range is restricted (Table 2), but does not require population size data (needed in criteria A, C and D) to assign risk status [43]. Under criterion B, a species should also meet at least two of the following conditions: severe fragmentation or existence at few locations; continuing decline; and/or extreme fluctuations [24, 25].

Table 2.

Thresholds for geographical range (Criterion B) according to IUCN [25].

10.1177_194008291500800111-table2.tif

Results

The obtained information on distribution, ecology and conservation status of all nine Phlegmariurus species recorded for the state of Veracruz is given in Appendix 2. These species were mostly distributed in the center (montane zone) and south (Los Tuxtlas and Uxpanapa regions) of the state between elevations of 120 m to 2,500 m, primarily in humid montane forests, but also in tropical humid, oak, pine-oak and Liquidambar forests. The municipalities with most collections and species were: San Andrés Tuxtla (30 collections/4 species), Zongolica (18/4), Soteapan (15/5), Tlalnelhuayocan (14/4), Acajete (9/5), Yecuatla (7/5) and Hidalgotitlán (7/3).

Within the five periods of collection dates, only eight Phlegmariurus collections were obtained from historical collectors such as Schiede, Müller, Pringle, Purpus and Barnes between 1828–1920; only six collections were recorded between 1921–1965, of which five were by Copeland in 1938; the period from 1965 to 1985 contains almost half of the collections (80) with the majority collected in the 1980s principally in the Los Tuxtlas region; the period from 1986 to 2000 comprises more than a decade in which only 24 collections were made; 56 collections were recorded between 2001–2014, the majority of these by the authors and/or collaborators and most of them collected in the Los Tuxtlas region, specifically on the San Martín Tuxtla volcano and in the vicinity of the Cofre de Perote region in the municipalities of Acajete and Tlalnelhuayocan.

The potential distributions of all eight species analyzed correspond to the central montane region of the state, the Los Tuxtlas region and the Sierra de Huayacocotla (Fig. 3 and 4). The predictive accuracy of the models generated for all species was high, with AUC values ranging between 0.960–0.995. The three variables that best explain the presence of all these Phlegmariurus species were: precipitation in wettest month, altitude, and mean temperature of wettest quarter. According to the IUCN [24, 25] classification, Phlegmariurus dichotomus, P. linifolius, P. pithyoides, P. pringlei, and P. taxifolius are classified as vulnerable (VU), whereas P. cuernavacensis, P. myrsinites, and P. reflexus are endangered (EN) in Veracruz, principally as a result of its restricted distribution as well as habitat loss and fragmentation. Finally, P. orizabae is classified as critically endangered (CR), as it is only known from a single specimen collected over a century and a half ago.

Fig. 3.

Current and potential distribution of Phlegmariurus species in Veracruz, Mexico: a) P. cuernavacensis, b) P. dichotomus, c) P. linifolius, d) P. myrsinites. The probability of presence as predicted by the Maxent models (0–1) is depicted. Specimen locations are indicated by dots, coded according to collection periods.

10.1177_194008291500800111-fig3.tif

Fig. 4.

Current and potential distribution of Phlegmariurus species in Veracruz, Mexico: a) P. pithyoides, b) P. pringlei, c) P. reflexus, d) P. taxifolius. The probability of presence as predicted by the Maxent models (0–1) is depicted. Specimen locations are indicated by dots, coded according to collection periods.

10.1177_194008291500800111-fig4.tif

Discussion

Our study focused at a regional level in which the conservation status of Phlegmariurus was evaluated with available information for the state of Veracruz only; some species considered as threatened in this study could have a different conservation status or even be abundant in other regions or geographical scales. Nonetheless, the status we assign for Veracruz is related to the severe deforestation problem [12], as it is among the states with the highest deforestation nationwide [38]. In addition, we note that the state is located within latitudes where some species reach their northernmost distribution and thus are at the margins of their global range [10]. Range limits are often determined by the unavailability of suitable habitats, which may cause smaller population sizes [44].

Phlegmariurus is represented by nine species in Veracruz, of which, according to our analysis, all are found in some category of risk according to IUCN [24, 25] criteria at the regional level. The principal reasons for the strong threat are the continuous loss and fragmentation of natural habitats, such as humid montane, pine-oak and tropical humid forests [12, 39, 40]. Our results are even more severe compared to those obtained by Krömer et al. [45] for 18 grammitid ferns that occur in Veracruz, of which 72% belong to a threatened category. Also, according to Tejero-Díez et al. [11], all Phlegmariurus species in Veracruz should be considered as threatened or endangered; to reach this conclusion, they utilized criteria based on Mexican legislation in order to classify conservation status. However, their results are based mainly on a study conducted over two decades ago by Palacios-Ríos [22]. Tejero-Díez et al. [46] reaffirmed the need to conduct studies to evaluate conservation status of Mexican ferns and lycophytes in general. This is particularly urgent because of the knowledge gaps for this important plant group, reflected in the Mexican legislation (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) for protection of flora and fauna, which includes mostly tree ferns and only one of the 13 Phlegmariurus species in Mexico.

With respect to its municipal distribution and vegetation types, the species evaluated are only found in 38 of the 212 municipalities of the state, located mainly in the central montane region and Los Tuxtlas in the southeast, with San Andrés Tuxtla the municipality having the most collected specimens (30). Most of the humid montane forests within Veracruz occur in these regions, which meet the preference of Phlegmariurus species for temperate-humid zones [47], since they require special light conditions and are sensitive to prolonged dry periods [48]. In other words, the distribution of the genus in Veracruz is mainly determined by the availability of moist environments with moderate temperatures, found principally in humid montane forests at medium elevations (1,000 to 2,500 m), meeting the most important variables for the presence of the species according to the Maxent model.

The majority of specimens were collected in the 1980s, coinciding with a large effort to conduct an extensive inventory under the Flora de Veracruz program [49]. However, 25% of the recorded Phlegmariurus specimens considered in this analysis are recent collections (2005–2014) acquired by the authors and/or collaborators. These current gatherings are of greater importance for the evaluation of their conservation status, since they confirm the presence of these species in remaining habitats, while about 30% of the older collections (periods i-iv) were made in locations, mainly at the slopes of Cofre de Perote and Pico de Orizaba, which are now deforested by human activities and land-use change during the 1970–1990s [50, 51]. During the period of 1990–2000 between 3.8 and 4.8 % of natural forest vegetation of Veracruz was deforested by the expansion of pasture lands, construction of roads, and urban development [12, 38].

Humid montane forests in Veracruz are also threatened by human population growth, with greater threat intensity in the central montane region [40]. In the case of the Los Tuxtlas region, 59% of forest vegetation cover was lost in the last three decades, despite being located within a Biosphere Reserve [39]. It is important to mention that those areas where Phlegmariurus species were found are also considered conservation hotspots in the state based on vegetation cover loss and anthropogenic pressures [12]. The loss of natural vegetation cover that is documented in these three studies directly affects plant diversity, especially of groups sensitive to these changes such as the Phlegmariurus genus.

Along with Chiapas and Oaxaca, Veracruz has the most vascular plant diversity of any Mexican state [30, 52], but it also has the highest loss of natural vegetation in the country [38]. In the period between 1984 and 2000, Veracruz lost 36% of its existing forest cover [53]. Presently, less than 8.6% of the original natural vegetation remains in isolated fragments, while the rest of the state is covered by agricultural and pasture land, as well as secondary vegetation [12]. The humid montane forest (the vegetation type associated with most Phlegmariurus specimens) is regarded as one of the most threatened ecosystems in Mexico [40, 54], representing approximately 1% of the country's surface area, of which only 0.4% is considered as primary and the rest (0.6%) as secondary vegetation [55, 56].

The reduction of natural habitat for flora in Veracruz has been alarming, and a large number of endemic species in the state are presently threatened by human activity and ecological deterioration [57]. In the case of Phlegmariurus, its vulnerability is mainly due to its sensitivity to prolonged dry periods [48], because most of the species are epiphytes and dependent on their host trees. Forest fragmentation directly affects their survival since this type of disturbance leads to drier and warmer microclimates, causing changes in epiphyte composition to more xerotolerant species [17, 19, 58, 59].

The low number of Phlegmariurus specimens collected during the 1990s indicates a strong decline in floristic inventories, possibly due to a change in the focus of botanical studies towards more genetic research, resulting in decreased budgets for herbarium work [60]. Despite the fact that Veracruz is considered one of the most well-known states for knowledge of its flora [57], there is still a need to conduct more research in different regions (e.g., Sierra de Huayacocotla and Otontepec in the north and the Uxpanapa region in the south) where detailed floristic studies have not been conducted. As a result, there is still an absence of most Phlegmariurus specimens in these particular regions, even though the potential distribution of some species includes them.

Collections in the central montane region of Pico de Orizaba are mostly very old, with most specimens being collected between 1906–1938 and additional collections dating from the 1980s. Since then the landscape of this region has been dramatically changed by human activities, such as the expansion of urban and pasture land [12]. Thus, we classified P. orizabae as critically endangered (CR) with only one known collection made in 1854, and we question whether a greater collection effort in this region and other areas with similar vegetation would result in rediscovering this species. It is possible that land-use change and habitat fragmentation in Veracruz may have resulted in the extirpation of this species in Veracruz. More recent collections (from the 1980s) have been made in neighboring Oaxaca [10].

Another factor to consider in the evaluation of the conservation status of the genus is the harvesting of individuals from the wild for illegal commercialization in local markets. In Veracruz, mainly in the capital region of the state, one can observe the sale of different species for ornamental purposes: P. taxifolius, P. myrsinites, and P. pringlei [20]. In Oaxaca, the use of P. reflexus and P. taxifolius has been documented for ceremonial purposes during the festivities of Holy Week [21]. Since these harvesting activities are frequent, uncontrolled and unregulated, we believe that they have a strong impact on local populations; however, no studies have quantified these impacts.

Implications for conservation

In conclusion, habitat loss due to anthropogenic activities, the antiquity of collected specimens, and the lack of botanical studies are the main reasons affecting the evaluation of conservation of the Phlegmariurus species in Veracruz. The present study is the first to conduct a detailed evaluation of its conservation status at a regional level. Since most Phlegmariurus species from Veracruz occur as epiphytes in natural humid montane forests, they are largely absent from disturbed or secondary habitats. This suggests that human impacts reduce microenvironments that are favorable for their presence and distribution. Consequently, Phlegmariurus species seem to be suitable bioindicators for the evaluation of humid montane forest health and biodiversity. Together with other groups, such as filmy and grammitid ferns [17, 45, 61], they may be suitable to detect priority areas for conservation.

We identified significant gaps in knowledge of Phlegmariurus distribution in the northern and southern parts of Veracruz, mainly in the Huayacocotla and Uxpanapa regions that are not included in the current protected areas network of Veracruz [62]. This highlights the importance of conducting detailed floristic inventories in order to confirm the potential distribution of several Phlegmariurus species and reveal other endemic or endangered plants, which could argue for the creation of new reserves in these regions. In addition to in situ conservation, it is important to raise awareness among plant collectors and the public about Phlegmariurus and epiphytes in general. Moreover, environmental education, management programs and regulations should be applied in order to promote the sustainable harvest of Phlegmariurus as well as discourage their illegal commercialization.

Our results contrast with the national legislation which lists only one species, P. dichotomus, as “protected” by law (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) and classified as vulnerable, whereas none of the nine species reported for Veracruz have been previously included in the IUCN Red List [63]. We consider that the Mexican law regarding the protection of biodiversity and list of endangered species [23] is currently incomplete and requires the consideration and integration of studies such as ours, to enable an updated and more complete evaluation of the state of conservation of species of flora in Mexico.

Though Phlegmariurus is represented by relatively few species in Veracruz and Mexico, our study could serve as a model for future work in other groups of tropical vascular epiphytes [17, 18, 64]. The lack of knowledge about the distribution of many groups of tropical plants [65], in addition to the continuing reduction in natural habitat, make it urgent to conduct more floristic studies for conservation purposes in Mexico and other parts of the world.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the herbaria visited for the facilities given for the review of specimens. We also thank Alan Smith for support in species identification, Jorge Gómez, Reyna Pérez and Yader Ruíz for providing data of their own collected specimens, Roberto Castro (Fig. 2c), Valeria Guzmán (Fig. 2e) and the C.V. Starr Virtual Herbarium of The New York Botanical Garden (Fig. 2d;  http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/VirtualHerbarium.asp) for providing digital photos; Irving Hernández for technical assistance in using Maxent; Lilia Ruíz for preparing the figures 24; and Alan Smith, Amparo Acebey, Valeria Guzmán and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this manuscript. We acknowledge the Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) for the scholarships 224291 and 272614 awarded to SAM and CICH, respectively. This study was supported by a postdoctoral grant from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and a PROMEP grant to TK (PROMEP/103.5/07/2753).

References

1.

Wikström, N., Kenrick, P., Chase, M., 1999. Epiphytism and terrestrialization in tropical Huperzia. Plant Systematics and Evolution 218:221–243. Google Scholar

2.

Field, A. R., Bostock, P. D., 2013. New and existing combinations in Palaeotropical Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae) and lectotypification of the type species Phlegmariurus phlegmaria (L.) T. Sen & U. Sen. PhytoKeys 20:33–51. Google Scholar

3.

Zotz, G., 2013. The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes - a critical update. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 177:453–481. Google Scholar

4.

Øllgaard, B., 1992. Neotropical Lycopodiaceae – an overview. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79:687–717. Google Scholar

5.

Øllgaard, B., 1987. A revised classification of the Lycopodiaceae sens. lat. Opera Botanica 92:153–178. Google Scholar

6.

Christenhusz, M. J. M., Xian-Chun, Z., Schneider, H., 2011. A linear sequence of extant families and genera of lycophytes and ferns. Phytotaxa 19:7–54. Google Scholar

7.

Øllgaard, B., 2012a. New combinations in Neotropical Lycopodiaceae. Phytotaxa 57:10–22. Google Scholar

8.

Øllgaard, B., 2012b. Nomenclatural changes in Brazilian Lycopodiaceae. Rodriguésia 63:479–482. Google Scholar

9.

Wagner, W. H., Beitel, J. M., 1992. Generic classification of modern North American Lycopodiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79:676–686. Google Scholar

10.

Mickel, J. T., Smith, A. R., 2004. The pteridophytes of Mexico. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, New York. Google Scholar

11.

Tejero-Díez, D., Torres-Díaz, A., Mickel, J. T., Mehltreter, K., Krömer, T., 2011. Pteridoflora de Veracruz. In: La biodiversidad en Veracruz: Estudio de Estado. CONABIO (Ed.), II Vol, pp. 97–115. CONABIO, Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Universidad Veracruzana, Instituto de Ecología, A. C, Mexico. Google Scholar

12.

Ellis, A., Martínez-Bello, M., Monroy-Ibarra, R., 2011. Focos rojos para la conservación de la biodiversidad. In: La biodiversidad en Veracruz: Estudio de Estado. CONABIO (Ed.), I Vol, pp. 351–367. CONABIO, Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Universidad Veracruzana, Instituto de Ecología, A. C, Mexico. Google Scholar

13.

Vázquez-Torres, M., Campos-Jiménez, J., Cruz-Pérez, A., 2006. Los helechos y plantas afines del bosque mesófilo de montaña de Banderilla, Veracruz, México. Polibotánica 22:6–77. Google Scholar

14.

Flores-Palacios, A., García-Franco, J. G., 2008. Habitat isolation changes the beta diversity of the vascular epiphyte community in lower montane forest, Veracruz, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:191–207. Google Scholar

15.

Mehltreter, K., 2008. Helechos. In: Agroecosistemas cafetaleros de Veracruz: biodiversidad, manejo y conservación.Manson, R., Hernández-Ortiz, V., Gallina, S., and Mehltreter, K., (Eds.), pp. 83–93. Instituto de Ecología A. C., Xalapa, Mexico. Google Scholar

16.

Carvajal-Hernández, C., Krömer, T., Vázquez-Torres, M., 2014. Riqueza y composición florística de pteridobiontes en bosque mesófilo de montaña y ambientes asociados, en el centro de Veracruz, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85:491–501. Google Scholar

17.

Krömer, T., Gradstein, S., 2003. Species richness of vascular epiphytes in two primary forests and fallows in the Bolivian Andes. Selbyana 24:19–195. Google Scholar

18.

Köster, N., Friedrich, K., Nieder, N., Barthlott, W., 2009. Conservation of epiphyte diversity in an Andean landscape transformed by human land use. Conservation Biology 25:911–919. Google Scholar

19.

Larrea, M. L., Werner, F., 2010. Response of vascular epiphyte diversity to different land-use intensities in a neotropical montane wet forest. Forest Ecology and Management 260:1950–1955. Google Scholar

20.

Flores-Palacios, A., Valencia-Díaz, S., 2007. Local illegal trade reveals unknown diversity and involves a high species richness of wild vascular epiphytes. Biological Conservation 136:372–387. Google Scholar

21.

Solano-Gómez, R., Cruz-Lustre, G., Martínez-Feria, A., Lagunez-Rivera, L., 2010. Plantas utilizadas en la celebración de la semana santa en Zaachila, Oaxaca, México. Polibotánica 29:263–279. Google Scholar

22.

Palacios-Ríos, M., 1992. Las Pteridofitas del estado de Veracruz, México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. Google Scholar

23.

SEMARNAT. 2010. NOM-059-ECOL-2010. Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo.  http://www.profepa.gob.mx/innovaportal/file/435/1/NOM_059_SEMARNAT_2010.pdfGoogle Scholar

24.

IUCN. 2003. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

25.

IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp. Google Scholar

27.

Morrone, J. J., 2005. Hacia una síntesis biogeográfica de México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 76:207–252. Google Scholar

28.

Soto-Esparza, M., Geissert, K. D., 2011. Geografía. In: La biodiversidad en Veracruz: Estudio de Estado. CONABIO (Ed.), I Vol, pp. 31–34. CONABIO, Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Universidad Veracruzana, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Mexico. Google Scholar

29.

Soto-Esparza, M., Giddings, B. L., 2011. Clima. In: La biodiversidad en Veracruz: Estudio de Estado. CONABIO (Ed.), I Vol, pp. 3–52. CONABIO, Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Universidad Veracruzana, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Mexico. Google Scholar

30.

Castillo-Campos, G., Avendaño-Reyes, S., Medina-Abreo, M. E., 2011. Flora y Vegetación. In: La biodiversidad en Veracruz: Estudio de Estado. CONABIO (Ed.), I Vol, pp. 163–179. CONABIO, Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Universidad Veracruzana, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Mexico. Google Scholar

31.

Acebey, A. R., Krömer, T., Vázquez-Torres, M., Tejero-Díez, J. D., Accepted. Helechos y licófitos de la Reserva de la Biosfera Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, México. Botanical Sciences. Google Scholar

32.

Carvajal-Hernández, C., Krömer, T., Accepted. Riqueza y distribución de helechos y licófitos en el gradiente altitudinal del Cofre de Perote, centro de Veracruz, México. Botanical Sciences. Google Scholar

33.

Zizka, G., Schmidt, M., Schulte, K., Novoa, P., Pinto, R., König, K., 2009. Chilean Bromeliaceae: diversity, distribution and evaluation of conservation status. Biodiversity and Conservation 18:2449–2471. Google Scholar

34.

Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Schapire, R. E., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231–259. Google Scholar

35.

Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M., 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175. Google Scholar

36.

INEGI. 2007. Carta de Uso del Suelo y Vegetación. Serie IV, 1:250 000. INEGI, México, D. F. Google Scholar

38.

SEMARNAT-PNUD. 2005. Informe de la situación del medio ambiente en México; compendio de estadísticas ambientales.  http://web2.semarnat.gob.mx/informacionambiental/Documents/01_informes/informe_2005.pdfGoogle Scholar

39.

Challenger, A., Dirzo, R., 2009. Factores de cambio y estado de la biodiversidad. In: Capital natural de México, vol. II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. CONABIO (Ed.), pp. 37–73. CONABIO, México, D. F. Google Scholar

40.

CONABIO. 2010. El bosque mesófilo de montaña en México: amenazas y oportunidades para su conservación y manejo sostenible. CONABIO, México, D. F. Google Scholar

41.

IUCN. 2014. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 11. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee.  http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar

42.

Gaston, K. J., Fuller, R. A., 2009. The sizes of species' geographic ranges. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1–9. Google Scholar

43.

Rivers, M. C., Taylor, L., Brummitt, N. A., Meagher, T. R., Roberts, D. L., Lughadha, E. N., 2011. How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species? Biological Conservation 144:2541–2547. Google Scholar

44.

Lomolino, M. V., Channell, R., 1995. Splendid isolation: patterns of range collapse in endangered mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 76:335–347. Google Scholar

45.

Krömer, T., Acebey, A. R., Smith, A. R., 2013. Taxonomic update, distribution and conservation status of grammitid ferns (Polypodiaceae, Polypodiopsida) in Veracruz State, Mexico. Phytotaxa 82:29–44. Google Scholar

46.

Tejero-Díez, J. D., Torres-Díaz, A. N., Gual-Díaz, M., 2014. Licopodios y helechos en el bosque mesófilo de montaña de México. In: Bosques Mesófilos de Montaña de México, diversidad, ecología y manejo.Gual-Díaz, M., and Rendón-Correa, A., (Comps.), pp. 197–220. CONABIO, Mexico, D. F. Google Scholar

47.

Moran, R., 2008. Diversity, biogeography and floristics. In: Biology and evolution of ferns and lycophytes.Ranker, T. A., and Haufler, C., (Eds.), pp. 367–394. Cambridge University Press, New York. Google Scholar

48.

Øllgaard, B., 1995. Diversity of Huperzia (Lycopodiaceae) in Neotropical montane forest. In: Biodiversity and conservation of Neotropical montane forest.Churchill, S. R., Balslev, H., Forero, E., and Luteyn, J. L., (Eds.), pp. 349–358. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Google Scholar

49.

Gómez-Pompa, A., 2010. Programa Flora de Veracruz. In: Atlas de la flora de Veracruz: Un patrimonio natural en peligro.Gómez-Pompa, A., Krömer, T., and Castro-Cortés, R., (Eds.), pp. 43–56. Comisión del Estado de Veracruz para la Conmemoración de la Independencia Nacional y la Revolución Mexicana, Xalapa, Mexico. Google Scholar

50.

Dirzo, R., García, M. C., 1992. Rates of deforestation in Los Tuxtlas, a Neotropical area in southeast Mexico. Conservation Biology 6:84–90. Google Scholar

51.

Guevara, S., Sánchez-Ríos, G., Landgrave, R., 2004. La deforestación. In: Los Tuxtlas. El paisaje de la sierra.Guevara, S., Laborde, J., and Sánchez-Ríos, G., (Eds.), pp. 85–108. Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Mexico. Google Scholar

52.

Espejo-Serna, A., López-Ferrari, A. R., Salgado-Ugarte, I., 2004. A current estimate of angiosperm diversity in Mexico. Taxon 53:12–130. Google Scholar

53.

Manson, R., 2004. Los servicios hidrológicos y la conservación de los bosques de México. Madera y Bosques 10:3–20. Google Scholar

54.

Toledo-Aceves, T., Meave, J. A., González-Espinoza, M., Ramírez-Marcial, N., 2011. Tropical montane cloud forests: current threats and opportunities for their conservation and sustainable management in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management 92:974–981. Google Scholar

55.

Palacio-Prieto, J. L., Bocco, G., Velásquez, A., Mas, J., Takaki-Takaki, F., Victoria, A., Luna-González, L., Gómez-Rodríguez, G., López-García, J., Palma, M. J., Trejo-Vázquez, I., Peralta, H. A., Prado-Molina, J., Rodríguez-Aguilar, A., Mayorga-Saucedo, R., González, M. F., 2000. La condición actual de los recursos forestales en México: resultados del Inventario Forestal Nacional 2000. Investigaciones Geográficas 43:183–203. Google Scholar

56.

Gual-Díaz, M., González-Medrano, F., 2014. Los bosques mesófilos de montaña en México. In: Bosques mesófilos de montaña de México: diversidad, ecología y manejo. CONABIO (Ed.), pp. 27–68. CONABIO, Mexico, D. F. Google Scholar

57.

Gómez-Pompa, A., Krömer, T., and Castro-Cortés, R., Eds. 2010. Atlas de la flora de Veracruz: Un patrimonio natural en peligro. Comisión del Estado de Veracruz para la Conmemoración de la Independencia Nacional y la Revolución Mexicana, Xalapa, Mexico. Google Scholar

58.

Paciencia, M. L. B., Prado, J., 2005. Effects of forest fragmentation on pteridophyte diversity in a tropical rain forest in Brazil. Plant Ecology 180:87–104. Google Scholar

59.

Werner, F. A., Homeier, J., Gradstein, R., 2005. Diversity of vascular epiphytes on isolated remnant trees in the montane forest belt of southern Ecuador. Ecotropica 11:21–40. Google Scholar

60.

Magaña, P., Villaseñor, J. L., 2002. La flora de México ¿se podrá conocer completamente? Ciencias 66:24–26. Google Scholar

61.

Krömer, T., García-Franco, J.G., Toledo-Aceves, T., In press. Epífitas vasculares como bioindicadores de la calidad forestal: impacto antrópico sobre su diversidad y composición. In: Bioindicadores: guardianes de nuestro futuro ambiental.González-Zuarth, C.A., Vallarino-Moncada, A., Pérez-Jimenez, J.C., and Low-Pfeng, A.M., (Eds.). Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC) - El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Mexico. Google Scholar

62.

Rodríguez-Luna, E., Gómez Pompa, A., López-Acosta, J. C., Velázquez-Rosas, N., Aguilar-Domínguez, Y., Vázquez-Torres, M., 2011. Atlas de los Espacios Naturales Protegidos de Veracruz. Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Xalapa, Mexico. Google Scholar

63.

IUCN. 2014. Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2.  http://www.iucnredlist.org/ Google Scholar

64.

Barthlott, W., Schmit-Neuerburg, V., Nieder, J., Engwald, S., 2001. Diversity and abundance of vascular epiphytes: a comparison of secondary vegetation and primary montane rain forest in the Venezuelan Andes. Plant Ecology 152:145–156. Google Scholar

65.

Morawetz, W., Raedig, C., 2007. Angiosperm biodiversity, endemism and conservation in the Neotropics. Taxon 56:1245–1254. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

10.1177_194008291500800111-fig1a.tif

Appendix 2.

10.1177_194008291500800111-fig1b.tif
© 2015 Samaria Armenta-Montero, César I. Carvajal-Hernández, Edward A. Ellis and Thorsten Krömer. This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and source of the work. The license ensures that the published article will be as widely available as possible and that your article can be included in any scientific archive. Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers.
Samaria Armenta-Montero, César I. Carvajal-Hernández, Edward A. Ellis, and Thorsten Krömer "Distribution and conservation status of Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae) in the state of Veracruz, Mexico," Tropical Conservation Science 8(1), 114-137, (20 March 2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800111
Received: 2 October 2014; Accepted: 14 January 2015; Published: 20 March 2015
KEYWORDS
Anthropogenic disturbance
endangered species
ferns and lycophytes
Huperzia
IUCN Red List
MaxEnt
Back to Top