Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
28 March 2016 Transferability of microsatellite markers among Myrtaceae species and their use to obtain population genetics data to help the conservation of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
Bruna Saviatto Fagundes, Lucas Fernando da Silva, Renata Mussoi Giacomin, Daiane Secco, Jesus Alberto Díaz-Cruz, Paulo Roberto Da-Silva
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Myrtaceae species play an important role in maintaining the biodiversity of the Atlantic Forest. However, most species of this biome have not been studied. In this work we examined whether microsatellite markers developed for other Myrtaceae species are useful in genetic studies of native species of the Atlantic Forest. We evaluated the transferability of 21 microsatellite markers derived from Eucalyptus sp., Eugenia uniflora, and Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel to eight Atlantic Forest species (Campomanesia xanthocarpa (guabiroba do mato), Campomanesia adamantium, Eugenia uniflora (surinam cherry), Eugenia involucrata (cherry of the Rio Grande), Myrcianthes pungens (guabiju), Plinia cauliflora (jaboticaba), Psidium guajava (guava), and Psidium sp.(araçá) and the utility of the transferred markers in obtaining genetic data from Eugenia uniflora. The transferability of microsatellite primers pairs was high (>52%) in seven of the eight species studied. In three populations of E. uniflora, the transferred primers amplified the same average number of alleles, and the same expected heterozygosity was obtained with species-specific primers. The genetic parameters FIS, Shannon diversity, genetic distance of Nei, FST and FIT, AMOVA, and the PCoA were calculated using data from four transferred microsatellites. Results were similar to those obtained using species-specific primers. Both datasets (from transferred and species-specific primers) indicated that E. uniflora populations of the Atlantic Forest are unstructured and have high genetic diversity. The results of our study indicate that transferability of microsatellite markers is an economic and powerful way to obtain genetic information of Myrtaceae species of the Atlantic Forest, and consequently, will aid in the conservation of these species and the biome.

Introduction

Among the most threatened biomes in Brazil urgently in need of conservation strategies is the Atlantic Forest. The second largest tropical rainforest in America occurs in this biome, and is one of the world's biodiversity “hotspots” [1]. The Atlantic Forest has been dramatically reduced by human activities, and currently only about 8.5% of its original size remains [2]. Approximately 54% of the plant species of the Atlantic Forest are endemic [2] and many of these have not been studied, which increases their risk of genetic erosion. These species also include several members of the Myrtaceae family [3].

The Myrtaceae family is distributed throughout the southern hemisphere; the highest numbers of species occur in Western Australia and in the Cerrado and Atlantic Forest of Brazil [45]. In the Atlantic Forest, approximately 650 species are known, many of them endemic [6]. The abundance of Myrtaceae in this biome suggests that they play an important role in restoring and maintaining the community's biodiversity. Most of these species are pioneer and fruit-bearing species, which provide food for wildlife. Therefore, many species of this family are used in reforestation projects for the regeneration of degraded areas in Brazil and in ecological corridors that connect the remaining forest fragments [78]. The fruit-bearing Myrtaceae of the Atlantic Forest include Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg. (guabiroba do mato), Campomanesia adamantium (Cambess) O. Berg., Eugenia uniflora L. (surinam cherry), Eugenia involucrata D.C. (cherry of the Rio Grande), Myrcianthes pungens O. Berg. (guabiju), Plinia cauliflora O. Berg (jaboticaba), and Psidium sp. (araçá) [91011121314, 5, 15]. The vernacular names written in brackets are like the species are known in English or Portuguese language and are valid according to the Encyclopedia of Life site ( http://eol.org/ Accessed 30 november 2015).

Besides their ecological importance, all these species have the potential for commercial exploitation in the food and cosmetic industries. E. uniflora, C. xanthocarpa, C. adamantium, and P. cauliflora are widely used in the manufacture of ice cream and candies, and E. uniflora is often used in the cosmetic industry for the manufacture of shampoos and hydrating creams. Commercial exploitation, if not coupled with conservation strategies, creates a risk for these species. Despite the ecological importance and economic potential of the Myrtaceae species, molecular genetics data only of E. uniflora [16] and P. cauliflora [17] are available.

Most studies on genetic diversity and structure of natural populations use microsatellite markers, also known as SSR (simple sequence repeat). Microsatellites are highly polymorphic and codominant, facilitating the study of detailed patterns of genetic diversity of natural populations [18]. Microsatellite markers have not been developed for Myrtaceae species of the Atlantic Forest. The development of specific primers for microsatellite locus amplification is an expensive and time-consuming process involving cloning and sequencing of the DNA fragments [19]. However, transferability of microsatellite primers between species in the same genus or between different genera is possible (20-24).

Currently, 366 microsatellite markers have been developed for the genus Eucalyptus [25262728293031], 28 for Corymbia [3233], 113 for Melaleuca [3435), 24 for Metrosideros [36, 37], nine for Eugenia [16], 14 for Myrtus [38], 10 for Calothamnus [39] and 13 for Acca [40]. These markers may be an important tool in the genetics studies of other species belonging to the Myrtaceae family.

Our objective was to determine whether microsatellite markers developed for other Myrtaceae species are applicable to population genetics studies of the species native to the Atlantic Forest. We tested the transferability of 21 microsatellite primers pairs (from Eucalyptus sp., Eugenia uniflora L., and Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) in seven native species from the Atlantic Forest (Campomanesia xanthocarpa, Campomanesia adamantium, Eugenia uniflora, Eugenia involucrata, Myrcianthes pungens, Plinia cauliflora, and Psidium sp.) and in one native of Cerrado with natural occurrence in the Atlantic Forest (Psidium guajava L. [guava]). Furthermore, we tested the utility of the transferred microsatellite markers to obtain population genetics data from one of the species (Eugenia uniflora).

Methods

Plant material for the transferability test

To select species for tests, we explored the Guarapuava region, State of Paraná, Southern Brazil (Fig. 1) to determine populations of Myrtaceae fruit trees common in this region. During these collections, we identified eight species: Campomanesia xanthocarpa, Campomanesia adamantium, Eugenia uniflora, Eugenia involucrata, Myrcianthes pungens, Plinia cauliflora, Psidium sp. and Psidium guajava. Young leaves of each species from five different plants were collected and kept in liquid nitrogen until DNA extraction.

Fig. 1.

Map of Brazil showing the region where Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg., Campomanesia adamantium (Cambess) O. Berg., Eugenia uniflora L., Eugenia involucrata D.C., Myrcianthes pungens O. Berg., Plinia cauliflora O. Berg, Psidium sp., Psidium guajava and three populations of Eugenia uniflora L. were sampled.

10.1177_194008291600900122-fig1.tif

Eugenia uniflora material for population genetics study

Eugenia uniflora samples were collected from three populations in the Guarapuava region, state of Paraná, southern Brazil for population genetics analysis (Fig. 1). In each population, we sampled 20 adult trees from the same generation. The populations were named A, B, and C. These populations were separated from one another by a distance of 12 km. The collected leaves were stored in liquid nitrogen until DNA extraction.

DNA extraction

The DNA of all species was extracted following the protocol proposed by Sharma et al. [41]. One ml of extraction buffer (20 mM EDTA, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 2 M NaCl, 2% CTAB, 2% PVP, 2% β-mercaptoethanol) was added to a tube containing 100 mg of tissue previously ground in liquid nitrogen. The tubes were placed in a water bath at 65°C for 30 min. DNA was separated from the extraction solution by precipitation with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and centrifugation. Next, DNA was precipitated with PEG 4000 (polyethylene glycol) and successively washed with ethanol to obtain DNA of high purity. After extraction, the DNA was resuspended in TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 1 mM EDTA), treated with RNase at 37°C for 30 min, and stored at -20°C until use.

Transferability test for microsatellite markers

For transferability tests we selected 21 pairs of primers from published literature. Thirteen of these loci were identified in Eucalyptus spp. [25], seven in E. uniflora L. [16], and one in M. alternifolia Cheel [35] (Appendix 1). The microsatellite loci were named Embra, Eun, and Scutt, derived from Eucalyptus spp., E. uniflora, and M. alternifolia, respectively. For the selection of microsatellite primers, we considered the number of amplified alleles. Preference was given to primer pairs that amplified more alleles. Except E. uniflora, which was tested for 13 loci, all the other species were tested for all 21 loci. E. uniflora was not tested for the seven Eun loci because these loci were developed for this species.

For Embra and Eun loci, the reactions were conducted in a final volume of 10 µL containing 25 ng DNA, 2.5 µM of each primer, 250 µM of each dNTP, 1.0 mM of MgCl2, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase, and 1X PCR buffer. For the marker Scutt052, reactions were conducted in a final volume of 15 uL containing 30 ng DNA, 2.5 uM of each primer, 250 uM each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 U of Taq DNA Polymerase, and 1X PCR buffer. For DNA amplification by PCR the thermal cycler was programmed for initial denaturation at 96°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, primer annealing temperature (Appendix 1) for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 15 min. After amplification, the fragments were separated on a 3% agarose gel in a constant 110 V current for 4 h and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg mL−1) in UV light. The size of amplified DNA fragments was estimated by comparison with a molecular weight marker 100-bp DNA ladder.

For each primer pair, the first thermocycler program started with the annealing temperature described in the literature. After obtaining the results of this PCR, three outcomes were possible: 1) the expected size fragment amplification; 2) nonspecific amplification; or 3) no amplification. Given scenario 1, if any genotype did not exhibit amplification, the reaction was repeated to be sure of the null allele. When scenario 2 occurred, new PCR programs were run and temperature was increased by 2 °C until the specific amplification was obtained or 60°C was reached. Given scenario 3, new PCR programs were run and temperature was lowered by 2 °C until the amplification was obtained or 45 °C was reached.

Evaluation of the utility of transferred microsatellite primers in the population-level study Three populations of E. uniflora were studied with the transferred microsatellite primers to evaluate the utility of these markers for population-level studies. In addition to transferring the primer pairs, we used four primer pairs developed from the species itself (Table 1). Twenty trees from each population were individually genotyped for each microsatellite loci. The number of alleles per locus, observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), coefficient of inbreeding (FIS), and Nei genetic distance [42] were estimated using the GDA (Genetic Data Analysis) software package [43] according to the following equations. Observed heterozygosity:

Table 1.

Parameters of the four heterologous and five own species microsatellite loci in Eugenia uniflora L. based on the analysis of three populations. A - number of alleles; Ho - observed heterozygosity; He - expected heterozygosity.

10.1177_194008291600900122-table1.tif

(1)

10.1177_194008291600900122-eq1.tif

where Pii is the observed frequency of homozygous genotypes of allele i. Expected heterozygosity:

(2)

10.1177_194008291600900122-eq2.tif

where pi is the frequency of the ith allele. Coefficient of inbreeding:

(3)

10.1177_194008291600900122-eq3.tif

Gene flow between populations was estimated using POPGENE [44] based on F statistics [45] and following Nei 1978 [42]. The hierarchical distribution of genetic variation among and within populations was determined by analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) [46,47] using the GENALEX 6 software package [48]. The genetic structure of populations was visualized by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using the GENEALEX 6 software package [48]. The linkage disequilibrium and the Hardy-Weinberger Equilibrium (HWE) were tested for all loci using the Genepop package [49].

Results

Microsatellite primer transferability

There was variation in the best annealing temperature among species for most primer pairs (Appendix 1). The primer Embra14 showed the greatest variation in temperature, with the best temperature of 49°C in E. uniflora and 58°C in P. guajava (Appendix 1). Primer pairs that produced fragments of the expected size and did not produce nonspecific amplification were considered transferred. Based on this criterion, the percentage of transferability was 38% (5 of 13) in E. uniflora, 57% (12 of 21) in E. involucrata, 62% (13 of 21) in M. pungens, 67% (14 of 21) in C. xanthocarpa, 71% (15 of 21) in C. adamantium, 57% (12 of 21) in P. guajava, 57% (12 of 21) in Psidium sp., and 52% (11 of 21) in P. cauliflora. The microsatellite primers Embra123, Eun5, and Eun11 were transferred to all species (Appendix 1). The primer pairs Embra99, Embra108, and Embra267 did not amplify in any of the tested species. The primer pair Eun22 amplified only in P. guajava and was monomorphic. The primer pair Embra265 amplified only in C. adamantium and exhibited a null allele. A large number of alleles were observed for the Embra14 locus with five alleles in C. xanthocarpa and E. uniflora, and Embra148 with five alleles in C. xanthocarpa (Appendix 1).

Utility of transferred microsatellite primers in the population-level genetics study of E. uniflora Analysis of the five microsatellite primers transferred to E. uniflora and the four developed for this species (species-specific) in three populations generated 29 alleles, with an average of 3.2 alleles per locus (Table 1). The average number of alleles for the transferred microsatellite primers and species-specific primers was the same (Table 1). The lowest and the highest number of alleles was two for Embra123, Embra148, and Eun121 loci, and five for the Embra14 locus (Table 1). Of the five alleles amplified with primer pair Embra14, three were unique in populations B and C. Observed heterozygosity (Ho) ranged from 0.00 (Embra148 locus) to 0.71 (Eun11 locus) (Table 1), and expected heterozygosity (He) from 0.20 (Embra123 locus) to 0.71 (Embra166 locus). The average of Ho and He for all loci was 0.33 and 0.50, respectively (Table 1). The mean of He was the same for transferred microsatellite and species-specific ones (Table 1). A significant (P < 0.05) deviation from HWE was observed in five loci in populations A and B, and six loci in the population C (Table 1). Pairwise comparisons after applying the Bonferroni correction (95%, α = 0.05) for multiple comparisons indicated linkage disequilibrium between Eun2 and Eun11 primers.

The He and Ho values for the species, considering the three populations studied, was 0.33 and 0.47, respectively (Table 2). The Shannon diversity index was 0.51, and ranged from 0.38 to 0.47 among populations (Table 2). The genetic distance of Nei [42] ranged from 0.25 to 0.31 among populations and was 0.33 overall. Gene flow was 5.02, 3.21, and 4.73 between populations A and B, A and C, and B and C, respectively. Among all populations, gene flow was 3.12. AMOVA indicated differentiation among populations of 7%, within populations of 26%, and within individuals of 67% (Table 3). The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) for each population ranged from 0.25 to 0.32, with a value of 0.29 for all populations (Table 2). The fixation index (FST) average of the three populations was 0.074, and FIT was 0.331. The first three axes of the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) accounted for approximately 39% of accumulated variability (Fig. 2).

Table 2.

Genetic parameters of three populations of Eugenia uniflora L. based on analysis of the nine microsatellite loci. N - number of trees sampled; Ho - observed heterozygosity; He - expected heterozygosity; Fis - inbreeding coefficient; H - Shannon diversity; Nei - genetic distance of Nei (1978).

10.1177_194008291600900122-table2.tif

Table 3.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on the data of nine microsatellite loci in three populations of Eugenia uniflora L.

10.1177_194008291600900122-table3.tif

Fig. 2.

Dispersion of three populations of Eugenia uniflora (A, B and C) according to principal component analysis (PCoA) based on the molecular variations in microsatellite markers.

10.1177_194008291600900122-fig2.tif

Discussion

The transferability of microsatellite markers as a strategy for studying the native species of the Atlantic Forest

Several studies have demonstrated the successful transferability of microsatellite primers between tree species [21, 22, 50, 51, 19, 52, 53]. However, most of these are species with high commercial value and/or are domesticated. We transferred microsatellite primers for native and uncultivated Myrtaceae species of the Atlantic Forest, which had no developed microsatellite markers (except E. uniflora). The microsatellite primers evaluated in species showed high rates of transferability, with an overall rate >52% (57% in E. involucrata, 62% in M. pungens, 67% in C. xanthocarpa, 71% in C. adamantium, 57% in P. guajava, 57% in Psidium sp., and 52% in P. cauliflora). Some microsatellite primers evaluated here have already shown good transferability rates for other species of Myrtaceae. The microsatellite primers Eucalyptus spp. and M. alternifolia exhibited 44.5% and 60% transferability to Acca sellowiana and other species of Melaleuca, respectively [54, 55]. Further, Ferreira-Ramos et al. [24] evaluated the E. uniflora primers in Eugenia pyriformis, E. brasiliensis, and E. francavilleana and obtained transferability rates above 60% for all species.

The potential of transferability of each microsatellite primer pair depends on the conservation of flanking regions on primer binding sites [23]. Many studies have demonstrated the high conservation of these flanking regions of microsatellites in cultivated tree species, which has resulted in high transferability indexes [50, 56, 57, 52, 51, 53]. The high transferability rates obtained in the 10 species tested (seven in this study and three in the study by Ferreira-Ramos et al. [24]) indicate that the flanking regions of microsatellites are also highly conserved in the genome of uncultivated Myrtaceae species native to the Atlantic Forest. Thus, microsatellite transferability is an effective method for obtaining molecular markers for use in native Myrtaceae species of the Atlantic Forest to obtain molecular genetics data. The data that can be generated using these markers can help to develop more effective strategies for the conservation and/or sustainable exploitation of these species.

Utility of heterologous microsatellite markers in population genetics studies of E. uniflora After the transfer of the microsatellite primer pair into a species, its ability to differentiate genotypes and populations needs to be evaluated. This is necessary because a transferred primer pair will only be useful if it is robust and capable of detecting differences between individuals and populations. We used the microsatellite primers transferred to E. uniflora to evaluate them in generating population genetics data.

The evaluation of four heterologous loci together with five species-specific ones showed that Ho (0.33) in E. uniflora populations was low compared to other tree species with cross-fertilization such as Vitellaria paradoxa (0.74), Araucaria angustifolia (0.52), Eugenia pyriformis (0.72), Eugenia brasiliensis, and Eugenia francavilleana (0.57) [585960, 24). This low Ho appears to be intrinsic to E. uniflora, and was also observed in natural populations from the regions of the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro (Ho = 0.30 for both) [61, 24]. Its rate of self-fertilization, which according to Almeida et al. [8] is approximately 10%, can help explain this low Ho. Expected heterozygosity was above Ho in populations A and B, and on average, the populations were lower than the expected in HWE. Furthermore, the observation of only two primers in HWE in all populations supports this conclusion. This result may be due to several factors, such as ***self-fertilization, limited sample size, Wahlund effect, and presence of null alleles, the latter being a common factor in transferability work [626364].

The AMOVA results showed that most variability of E. uniflora populations from Paraná State is within populations, and according to PCoA and FST, these populations are not structured. Eugenia uniflora populations from the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro also did not present genetic structure (FST values of 0.03 and 0.04, respectively) [62, 16]. The non-genetic structure of populations of the three states indicates that most variability is maintained within populations. Hamrick et al. [65] and Ferreira-Ramos et al. [16] stated this is a characteristic of tropical forest tree populations. From the Shannon diversity and the genetic diversity of Nei [42] of each population, and overall values (Table 3), we conclude that even with low differentiation among populations, high variation within populations is sufficient to maintain high genetic diversity in the species.

High diversity and lack of genetic structure observed in E. uniflora can be explained by the gene flow observed among populations. All the pairs of populations showed gene flow higher than 3.2 (5.02, 3.21, and 4.73 between populations A and B, A and C, and B and C, respectively). These significant gene flow rates can be explained by the dispersal of the fruits of this species, which are eaten by birds and mammals [66]. By eating the fruit, animals disperse seeds from one population to another. Thus, birds with high foraging rates probably play an important role in maintaining high homogeneity and genetic diversity among populations of this species. Furthermore, bees (Family Apidae) are the main pollinators of this species [66], and the high mobility of bees may have facilitated pollen flow among populations.

Implications for Conservation

The results observed for E. uniflora support the hypothesis that the microsatellite primers analyzed in this study may produce the same robustness in obtaining population genetics data for other Myrtaceae species. This hypothesis is based on the observation that even by using only five plants of most species evaluated, the microsatellite primers amplified more than one allele. The expectation is that when used in populations with 20 or more plants, this number of alleles will increase significantly, and even those that were monomorphic may show polymorphism. Our results clarify the hypothesis that microsatellite markers of other Myrtaceae are useful in obtaining population genetics data of native species from the Atlantic Forest. To this end, these new heterologous microsatellites are an important tool for obtaining genetic data needed in conservation strategies of native Myrtaceae. The high genetic diversity observed in E. uniflora is important for t the development of conservation strategies, sustainable commercial exploitation, and breeding programs of this species. The data observed for E. uniflora show that the species is not suffering genetic erosion and even in fragmented environments is maintaining high genetic diversity. Apparently, for the populations of E. uniflora studied to date, no conservation effort is necessary.

References

1.

Galindo-Leal, C., Câmara, I.G., 2003. Atlantic Forest hotspot status: an overview. In: Galindo-Leal, C, Câmara, IG, (eds) The Atlantic Forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. CABS and Island Press, Washington, USA. Google Scholar

2.

SOS Mata Atlântica. 2013. Atlas dos Remanescentes Florestais da Mata Atlântica, no período de 2011 a 2012. Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica e Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais.  https://www.sosma.org.br/. Accessed 10 June 2015 Google Scholar

3.

Giaretta, A., de Menezes, L.F.T., Peixoto, A.L., 2015. Diversity of Myrtaceae in the southeastern Atlantic forest of Brazil as a tool for conservation. Brazilian Journal of Botany 38: 175–185. Google Scholar

4.

Govaerts, R., Sobral, M., Ashton, P., Barrie, F., Holst, B.K., Landrum, L.R., Matsumoto, K., Mazine, F.F., Lughadha, E.N., Proença, C., Silva, L.H.S., Wilson, P.G., Lucas, E.J., 2008. World checklist of Myrtaceae. Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, UK. Google Scholar

5.

Grattapaglia, D., Vaillancourt, R.E., Shepherd, M., Thumma, B.R., Foley, W., Külheim, C., Potts, B.M., Myburg, A.A., 2012. Progress in Myrtaceae genetics and genomics: Eucalyptus as the pivotal genus. Tree Genet Genomes 8: 463–508. Google Scholar

6.

Sobral, M., Proença, C., Souza, M., Mazine, F., Lucas, E., 2014. Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro.  http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB171. Accessed 31 Oct 2014 Google Scholar

7.

Lorenzi, H., 2002. Brazilian Trees. Instituto Plantarum de Estudos da Flora, São Paulo. Google Scholar

8.

Almeida, D.J., Faria, M.V., Da-Silva, P.R., 2011. Effect of forest fragmentation on microsporogenesis and pollen viability in Eugenia uniflora, a tree native to the Atlantic Forest. Genetics and Molecular Research 10: 2916–2923. Google Scholar

9.

Landrum, L.R., Kawasaki, M.L., 1997. The genera of Myrtaceae in Brazil an illustrated synoptic treatment and identification keys. Brittonia 49: 508–536. Google Scholar

10.

Lima, D.F., Goldenberg, R., Sobral, M., 2011. O gênero Campomanesia (Myrtaceae) no estado do Paraná, Brasil. Rodriguésia 62: 683–693 Google Scholar

11.

Donadio, LC, (2000) Jabuticaba [Myrciaria jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg]. FUNEP, Jaboticabal Google Scholar

12.

Wilson, P.G., O'brien, M.M., Gadek, P.A., Quinn, C.J., 2001. Myrtaceae revisited: a reassessment of intrafamilial groups. American Journal of Botany 88: 2013–2025. Google Scholar

13.

Maluf, A.M., Bilia, D.A.C., Barbedo, C.J., 2003. Drying and storage of Eugenia involucrata DC. seeds. Scientia Agricola 60: 471–475. Google Scholar

14.

Donadio, L.C., Moro, F.V., 2004. Potential of Brazilian Eugenia (Myrtaceae)- as ornamental and as a fruit crop. Acta Horticulturae 632: 65–68. Google Scholar

15.

Pommer, C.V., Murakami, K.R.N., 2009. Breeding Guava (Psidium guajava L.). In: Jain, SM, Priyadarshan, PM, (eds) Breeding Plantation Tree Crops: Tropical Species, Springer, New York, pp 83–120. Google Scholar

16.

Ferreira-Ramos, R., Laborda, P.R., Santos, M.D., Mayor, M.S., Mestriner, M.A., De Souza, A.P., Alzate-Marin, A.L., 2008. Genetic analysis of forest species Eugenia uniflora L. through of newly developed SSR markers. Conservation Genetics 9: 1281–1285. Google Scholar

17.

Vilela, R.C.F., de Aquino Assis, J.G., Filho, L.N., Viana, B.F., 2012. Sistema reprodutivo e diversidade genética de quatro espécies de Myrciaria (Myrtaceae, jabuticabeiras). Acta Botanica Brasilica 26: 727–734. Google Scholar

18.

Jarne, P., Lagoda, P.J., 1996. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 424–429. Google Scholar

19.

Decroocq, V., Fave, M.G., Hagen, L., Bordenave, L., Decroocq, S., 2003. Development and transferability of apricot and grape EST microsatellite markers across taxa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 912–922. Google Scholar

20.

Roa, A.C., Chavarriaga-Aguirre, P., Duque, M.C., Maya, M.M., Onierbale, M.W., Iglesias, C., Thome, J., 2000. Cross-species amplification of cassava (Manhihot esculenta) (Eurphorbiaceae) microsatellites: allelic polymorfhism and degree of relationship. American Journal of Botany 87: 1647–1655. Google Scholar

21.

González-Martínez, S.C., Robledo-Arnuncio, J.J., Collada, C., Diaz, A., Williams, C.G., Alía, R., Cervera, M.T., 2004. Cross-amplification and sequence variation of microsatellite loci in Eurasian hard pines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 103–111. Google Scholar

22.

Oliveira, M.S.P., Santos, J.B., Amorim, E.P., Ferreira, D.F., 2010. Variabilidade genética entre acessos de açaizeiro utilizando marcadores microssatélites. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 34: 1253–1260. Google Scholar

23.

Da-Silva, P.R., Milach, S.C.K., Tisian, L.M., 2011. Transferability and utility of white oat (Avena sativa) microsatellite markers for genetic studies in black oat (Avena strigosa). Genetics and Molecular Research 4: 2916–2923. Google Scholar

24.

Ferreira-Ramos, R., Accoroni, K.A.G., Rossi, A., Guidugli, M.C., Mestriner, M.A., Martinez, C.A., Alzate-Marin, A.L., 2014. Genetic diversity assessment for Eugenia uniflora L., E. pyriformis Cambess., E. brasiliensis Lam. and E. francavilleana O. Berg neotropical tree species (Myrtaceae) with heterologous SSR markers. Genetics Resource and Crop Evolution 61: 267–272. Google Scholar

25.

Brondani, R.P.V., Brondani, C., Tarchini, R., Grattapaglia, D., 1998. Development, characterization and mapping of microsatellite markers in Eucalyptus grandis and E urophylla. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 816–827. Google Scholar

26.

Brondani, R.P.V., Brondani, C., Grattapaglia, D., 2002. Towards a genus wide reference linkage map for Eucalyptus based exclusively on highly informative microsatellite markers. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 267: 338–347. Google Scholar

27.

Brondani, R.P.V., Williams, E.R., Brondani, C., Grattapaglia, D., 2006. A microsatellite-based consensus linkage map for species of Eucalyptus and a novel set of 230 microsatellite markers for the genus. BMC Plant Biology 6: 1–16. Google Scholar

28.

Byrne, M., Marquez-Garcia, M.I., Uren, T., Smith, D.S., Moran, G.F., 1996. Conservation and genetic diversity of microsatellite loci in the genus Eucalyptus. Australian Journal of Botany 44: 331–341. Google Scholar

29.

Ottewell, K.M., Donnellan, S.C., Moran, G.F., Paton, D.C., 2005. Multiplexed microsatellite markers for the genetic analysis of Eucalyptus leucoxylon (Myrtaceae) and their utility for ecological and breeding studies in other Eucalyptus species. Journal of Heredity 96: 445–451. Google Scholar

30.

Steane, D., Vaillancourt, R., Russell, J., Powell, W., Marshall, D., Potts, B., 2001. Development and characterization of microsatellite loci in Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae). Silvae Genetics 50: 89–91. Google Scholar

31.

Thamarus, K., Groom, K., Murrell, J., Byrne, M., Moran, G., 2002. A genetic linkage map for Eucalyptus globulus with candidate loci for wood, fibre and floral traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 379–387. Google Scholar

32.

Jones, M.E., Stokoe, R.L., Cross, M.J., Scott, L.J., Maguire, T.L., Shepherd, M., 2001. Isolation of microsatellite loci from spotted gum (Corymbia variegata), and cross-species amplification in Corymbia and Eucalyptus. Molecular Ecology Notes 1: 276–278. Google Scholar

33.

Shepherd, M., Kasem, S., Lee, D., Henry, R., 2006. Construction of microsatellite linkage maps for Corymbia. Silvae Genetics 55: 228–238. Google Scholar

34.

Miwa, M., Tanaka, R., Shinone, M., Kojiwa, K., Hogetsu, T., 2000. Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers in a tropical tree species, Melaleuca cajuputi (Myrtaceae). Molecular Ecology 9: 639–640. Google Scholar

35.

Rossetto, M., Slade, R.W., Baverstock, P.R., Henry, R.J., Lee, L.S., (1999) Microsatellite variation and assessment of genetic structure in tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia Myrtaceae). Molecular Ecology 8: 633–643. Google Scholar

36.

Crawford, N.G., Hagen, C., Sahli, H.F., Stacy, E.A., Glenn, T.S.C., 2008. Fifteen polymorphic microsatellite DNA loci from Hawaii's Metrosideros polymorpha (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), a model species for ecology and evolution. Molecular Ecology Resource 2: 308–310. Google Scholar

37.

Kaneko, S., Isagi, Y., Nobushima, F., 2007. Development of microsatellite markers for Metrosideros boninensis (Myrtaceae), an endangered endemic plant species from the Bonin Islands, Japan. Conservation Genetics 3: 753–755. Google Scholar

38.

Albaladejo, R.G., Sebastiani, F., Gonzalez-Martinez, S.C., Gonzalez-Varo, J.P., Vendramin, G.G., Aparicio, A., 2010. Isolation of microsatellite markers for the common Mediterranean shrub Myrtus communis (Myrtaceae). American Journal of Botany 97: 23–25. Google Scholar

39.

Elliott, C.P., Byrne, M., 2005. Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in the woody shrub, Calothamnus quadrifidus (Myrtaceae). Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 757–759. Google Scholar

40.

Santos, K.L., Santos, M.O., Laborda, P.R., Souza, A.P., Peroni, N., Nodari, R.O., 2008. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in Acca sellowiana (Berg) Burret. Molecular Ecology Resource 8: 998–1000. Google Scholar

41.

Sharma, K., Ajay, K.M., Raj, S.M., 2008. A simple and efficient method for extraction of genomic DNA from tropical tuber crops. African Journal of Biotechnology 7: 1018–1022. Google Scholar

42.

Nei, M., 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590. Google Scholar

43.

Weir, B., 1996. GENETIC DATA ANALYSIS II. Sunderland, Massachusetts Google Scholar

44.

Yeh, F.C., Yang, R.C., Boyle, T.B.J., Ye, Z.H., Mao, J.X., 1997. POPGENE, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Alberta, Canada Google Scholar

45.

Wright, S., 1978. Evolution and genetics of populations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar

46.

Excoffier, L., Smouse, P.E., Quattro, J.M., 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479–491. Google Scholar

47.

Michalakis, Y., Excoffier, L., 1996. A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci. Genetics 142: 1061–1064. Google Scholar

48.

Peakall, R.O.D., Smouse, P.E., 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. Google Scholar

49.

Rousset, F., 2008Genepop'007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resource 8: 103–106. Google Scholar

50.

Kijas, J.M., Fowler, J.C., Thomas, M.R., 1995. An evaluation of sequence tagged microsatellite site markers for genetic analysis within Citrus and related species. Genome 38: 349–355. Google Scholar

51.

Dirlewanger, E., Cosson, P., Tavaud, M., Aranzana, J., Poizat, C., Zanetto, A., Arús, P., Laigret, F., 2002. Development of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 127–138. Google Scholar

52.

Yamamoto, T., Kimura, T., Sawamura, Y., Kotobuki, K., Ban, Y., Hayashi, T., Matsuta, N., 2001. SSRs isolated from apple can identify polymorphism and genetic diversity in pear. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 865–870. Google Scholar

53.

Rallo, P., Tenzer, I., Gessler, C., Baldoni, L., Dorado, G., Martín, A., 2003. Transferability of olive microsatellite loci across the genus Olea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 940–946. Google Scholar

54.

Zucchi, M.I., Brondani, R.P.V., Pinheiro, J.B., Chaves, L.J., Coelho, A.S.G., Vencovsky, R., 2003. Genetic structure and gene flow in Eugenia dysenterica DC in the Brazilian Cerrado utilizing SSR markers. Genetics and Molecular Biology 26: 449–457. Google Scholar

55.

Rossetto, M., Harriss, F.C.L., Mclauchlan, A., Henry, R.J., Baverstock, P.R., Lee, L.S., 2000. Interspecific amplification of Tea Tree (Melaleuca alternifolia - Myrtaceae) microsatellite loci potential implications for conservation studies. American Journal of Botany 48: 367–373. Google Scholar

56.

Cipriani, G., Lot, G., Huang, W.G., Marrazzo, M.T., Peterlunger, E., Testolin, R., 1999. AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch], isolation, characterization and cross-species application in Prunus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 65–72. Google Scholar

57.

Billotte, N., Risterucci, A.M., Barcelos, E., Noyer, J.L., 2001. Development, characterization, and across-taxa utility of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) microsatellite markers. Genome 44: 413–425. Google Scholar

58.

Sanou, H., Lovett, P.N., Bouvet, J.M., 2005. Comparison of quantitative and molecular variation in agroforestry populations of the shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn) in Mali. Molecular Ecology 14: 2601–2610. Google Scholar

59.

Bittencourt, J.V.M., Sebbenn, A.M., 2009. Genetic effects of forest fragmentation in high-density Araucaria angustifolia populations in Southern Brazil. Tree Genetics & Genomes 5: 573–582. Google Scholar

60.

Ganopoulos, I., Aravanopoulos, A.F., Argiriou, A., Kalivas, A., Tsaftaris, A., 2011. Is the genetic diversity of small acattered forest tree populations at the southern limits of their range more prone to stochastic events? A wild cherry case study by microsatellite-based markers. Tree Genetics & Genomes 7: 1299–1313. Google Scholar

61.

Margis, R., Félix, D.B., Soares, J.F.C., Salgueiro, F., Araujo, D.S.D., Breyne, P., Montagu, M.V., Oliveira, D.E., Margis-Pinheiro, M., 2002. Genetic differentiation among three neighbouring Brazil-cherry (Eugenia uniflora L.) populations within the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest. Biodiversitya and Conservation 11: 149–163. Google Scholar

62.

Flores, J.M., Martinez, M.L.L., Martinez, C.A., Mestriner, M.A., Alzate-Marin, A.L., 2009. Transferability and characterization of nine microsatellite markers for the tropical tree species Tabebuia roseo-alba. Molecular Ecology Resource 9: 434–437. Google Scholar

63.

Nazareno, A.G., Pereira, R.A.S., Feres, J.M., Mestriner, M.A., Alzate-Marin, A.L., 2009. Transferability and characterization of microsatellite markers in two Neotropical Ficus species. Genetics and Molecular Biology 32: 568–571. Google Scholar

64.

Guidugli, M.C., Accoroni, K.A.G., Mestriner, M.A., Contel, E.P.B., Martinez, C.A., Alzate-Marin, A.L., 2010. Genetic characterization of 12 heterologous microsatellite markers for the giant tropical tree Cariniana legalis (Lecythidaceae). Genetics and Molecular Biology 33: 131–134. Google Scholar

65.

Hamrick, J.L., Godt, M.J., Sherman-Broyles, S., 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forest 6: 95–124. Google Scholar

66.

Gressler, E., Pizo, M.A., Morellato, L.P.C., 2006. Polinização e dispersão de sementes em Myrtaceae do Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Botany 29: 509–530. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Analysis parameters for 21 heterologous microsatellite loci in eight native species of Myrtaceae from Atlantic Forest. Ta: annealing temperature; A: number of alleles observed by primer.

10.1177_194008291600900122-table4.tif
© 2016 Bruna Saviatto Fagundes, Lucas Fernando da Silva, Renata Mussoi Giacomin, Daiane Secco, Jesus Alberto Díaz-Cruz and Paulo Roberto Da-Silva. This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and source of the work. The license ensures that the p ublished article will be as widely available as possible and that your article can be included in any scientific archive. Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers.
Bruna Saviatto Fagundes, Lucas Fernando da Silva, Renata Mussoi Giacomin, Daiane Secco, Jesus Alberto Díaz-Cruz, and Paulo Roberto Da-Silva "Transferability of microsatellite markers among Myrtaceae species and their use to obtain population genetics data to help the conservation of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest," Tropical Conservation Science 9(1), 408-422, (28 March 2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291600900122
Received: 30 November 2015; Accepted: 2 February 2016; Published: 28 March 2016
KEYWORDS
Atlantic forest
Eugenia uniflora
heterologous amplification
SSR
Back to Top