How to translate text using browser tools
29 November 2018 Response of Palmer Amaranth and Sweetpotato to Flumioxazin/Pyroxasulfone
Shawn C. Beam, Sushila Chaudhari, Katherine M. Jennings, David W. Monks, Stephen L. Meyers, Jonathan R. Schultheis, Mathew Waldschmidt, Jeffrey L. Main
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Studies were conducted to determine the tolerance of sweetpotato and Palmer amaranth control to a premix of flumioxazin and pyroxasulfone pretransplant (PREtr) followed by (fb) irrigation. Greenhouse studies were conducted in a factorial arrangement of four herbicide rates (flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone PREtr at 105/133 and 57/72 g ai ha–1, Smetolachlor PREtr 803 g ai ha–1, nontreated) by three irrigation timings [2, 5, and 14 d after transplanting (DAP)]. Field studies were conducted in a factorial arrangement of seven herbicide treatments (flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone PREtr at 40/51, 57/72, 63/80, and 105/133 g ha–1, 107g ha–1 flumioxazin PREtr fb 803 g ha–1S-metolachlor 7 to 10 DAP, and season-long weedy and weed-free checks) by three 1.9-cm irrigation timings (0 to 2, 3 to 5, or 14 DAP). In greenhouse studies, flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone reduced sweetpotato vine length and shoot and storage root fresh biomass compared to the nontreated check and S-metolachlor. Irrigation timing had no influence on vine length and root fresh biomass. In field studies, Palmer amaranth control was≥91% season-long regardless of flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone rate or irrigation timing. At 38 DAP, sweetpotato injury was≤37 and≤9% at locations 1 and 2, respectively. Visual estimates of sweetpotato injury from flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone were greater when irrigation timing was delayed 3 to 5 or 14 DAP (22 and 20%, respectively) compared to 0 to 2 DAP (7%) at location 1 but similar at location 2. Irrigation timing did not influence no.1, jumbo, or marketable yields or root length-to-width ratio.With the exception of 105/133 g ha–1, all rates of flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone resulted in marketable sweetpotato yield and root length-to-width ratio similar to flumioxazin fb S-metolachlor or the weed-free checks. In conclusion, flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone PREtr at 40/51, 57/72, and 63/80 g ha–1 has potential for use in sweetpotato for Palmer amaranth control without causing significant crop injury and yield reduction.

Nomenclature: Flumioxazin; pyroxasulfone; S-metolachlor; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Watson AMAPA; sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam

© Weed Science Society of America, 2018.
Shawn C. Beam, Sushila Chaudhari, Katherine M. Jennings, David W. Monks, Stephen L. Meyers, Jonathan R. Schultheis, Mathew Waldschmidt, and Jeffrey L. Main "Response of Palmer Amaranth and Sweetpotato to Flumioxazin/Pyroxasulfone," Weed Technology 33(1), 128-134, (29 November 2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.80
Received: 9 May 2018; Accepted: 14 August 2018; Published: 29 November 2018
KEYWORDS
application rate
Crop injury
herbicide efficacy
storage root shape
timing
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top