How to translate text using browser tools
31 January 2020 Interval between sequential glufosinate applications influences weed control in cotton
Taylor M. Randell, Lavesta C. Hand, Jenna C. Vance, A. Stanley Culpepper
Author Affiliations +

Dicamba and 2,4-D systems control many problematic weeds; however, drift to susceptible crops can be a concern in diverse production areas. Glufosinate-based systems are an alternative, but current recommended rates of glufosinate can result in variable control. Research was conducted in 2017 and 2018 to investigate the optimum time interval between sequential glufosinate applications and determine if the addition of glyphosate with glufosinate is beneficial for controlling Palmer amaranth and annual grasses in cotton. The interval between sequential applications (1, 3, 5, 7, 10, or 14 d or no second spray) was the whole plot and herbicide option (glufosinate or glufosinate plus glyphosate) was the subplot. Combined over herbicides, Palmer amaranth 15- to 20-cm tall (at four locations) was controlled 98% to 99% with sequential intervals of 1 to 7 d compared with 70% to 88% with intervals of 10 or 14 d. Lowest biomass weight and population densities were noted with 1- to 7-d intervals. Large crabgrass 15- to 20-cm tall (at five locations) was controlled 93% to 98% with glufosinate applications 3- to 7-d apart as compared with 76% to 81% with applications 10- to 14-d apart. Lowest biomass weights were observed with 1- to 7-d intervals. When glufosinate controlled grass less than 93%, adding glyphosate was beneficial. Neither interval between sequential applications nor herbicide option influenced cotton yield. Shorter time intervals between sequential application and including glyphosate can improve the effectiveness of a glufosinate-based system in managing Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass.

Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dicamba; glyphosate; glufosinate; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DP 1646 B2XF’, ‘PHY 430 W3FE’

© Weed Science Society of America, 2020.
Taylor M. Randell, Lavesta C. Hand, Jenna C. Vance, and A. Stanley Culpepper "Interval between sequential glufosinate applications influences weed control in cotton," Weed Technology 34(4), 528-533, (31 January 2020).
Received: 17 September 2019; Accepted: 17 January 2020; Published: 31 January 2020
Auxin alternative
cotton weed control
glufosinate-based system
interval between herbicide applications
Get copyright permission
Back to Top