How to translate text using browser tools
6 June 2024 Evaluation of row width and nozzle selection on spray coverage and weed control in flooded rice
Noah H. Reed, Thomas R. Butts, Jason K. Norsworthy, Jarrod T. Hardke, L. Tom Barber, Jason A. Bond, Hunter D. Bowman, Nick R. Bateman, Aurelie M. Poncet, Koffi B.J. Kouame
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Barnyardgrass and other troublesome weeds have become a major problem for producers in a flooded rice system. Cultural control options and more efficient herbicide applications have become a priority to increase efficiency and weed control in rice. This study aimed to determine the effects of row width and nozzle selection on spray coverage and weed control in a flooded rice system. A field experiment was conducted at 7 site-years (Lonoke, AR, in 2021 and 2022; Pine Tree, AR, in 2021 and 2022; Rohwer, AR, in 2022; and Stoneville, MS, in 2021 and 2022) as a randomized complete block split-plot design. Five nozzles (XR, AIXR, TTI, TTI60, and AITTJ60) (subplot factor) were used for herbicide applications, and plots were drill-seeded in four row widths (whole plot factor) (13, 19, 25, and 38 cm). A droplet size experiment was conducted to evaluate the droplet size and velocity of each nozzle type used in the field experiment. Overall, as row width increased, barnyardgrass density increased. The rice grown in a wider width took longer to generate canopy closure, allowing weed escapes in the crop. For example, the 13-cm width had a 12 percentage point canopy coverage increase compared to the 38-cm row width at the preflood timing resulting in a reduction of six barnyardgrass plants per square meter. The smallest droplet size-producing nozzle (XR) provided greater weed control throughout the study but is more prone to drift. The dual-fan nozzles (AITTJ60 and TTI60) had variable weed control impacts, and it was difficult to predict when this might occur; however, they did have increased deposits on water-sensitive cards compared to single-fan counterparts (AIXR and TTI). In conclusion, a narrower row width (e.g., 19-cm or less) and a smaller droplet size producing nozzle (XR) are optimal for barnyardgrass control in a flooded rice system.

Nomenclature: Barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.; rice, Oryza sativa L.

Noah H. Reed, Thomas R. Butts, Jason K. Norsworthy, Jarrod T. Hardke, L. Tom Barber, Jason A. Bond, Hunter D. Bowman, Nick R. Bateman, Aurelie M. Poncet, and Koffi B.J. Kouame "Evaluation of row width and nozzle selection on spray coverage and weed control in flooded rice," Weed Technology 38(1), 1-8, (6 June 2024). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2024.25
Received: 19 December 2023; Accepted: 16 April 2024; Published: 6 June 2024
KEYWORDS
application technology
canopy coverage
cultural control
droplet size
integrated weed management
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top