Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2005 Geographic variation in body mass of rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus in the Alps and the Pyrenees
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We compared the body mass of adult rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus shot in autumn in the French Pyrenees (Ariège), the French Alps (Hautes-Alpes) and the Italian Alps (Province of Verbania). Mean body mass of adults was greater in the Ariège than in the Hautes-Alpes both for cocks (466 vs 433 g) and hens (429 vs 406 g), with the body mass of Italian birds being intermediate (cocks 448 g, hens 418 g). The relatively large mass of rock ptarmigan in the Pyrenees contrasts with the geographic trends found in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus and grey partridge Perdix perdix in France. For the last two species, birds in the Pyrenees are smaller than those further north. The site differences that we observed in body mass of rock ptarmigan may be related to differences in availability of high quality foods, particularly ericaceous shrubs. However, at the continental scale within Europe, the body mass of rock ptarmigan appears to be greatest in northern latitudes.

Data on body mass in tetraonids are useful for investigating taxonomic relationships (Kahn et al. 1999), and for explaining the evolution of life history traits, including social organisation and demographic parameters (Wiley 1974, Trouvilliez et al. 1987, Sæther & Andersen 1988, Stearns 1992). In grouse, body mass may also be helpful in interpreting the effects of environmental stress on individuals (Sherfy & Pekins 1994). Such studies require accurate information on both inter- and intraspecific variation in body mass. In this paper we report on differences in body mass of two subspecies of rock ptarmigan in three areas: Lagopus mutus pyrenaicus in the French Pyrenees and L. m. helveticus in the French and Italian Alps.

Material and methods

Data collection

In France, we examined 53 adult rock ptarmigan shot by hunters during 1994–1999 in four communes in the Pyrenees, department of the Ariege (~42°30′N, 1°30′E) and 51 birds shot during 1979-1996 in nine communes in the Alps, department of the Hautes-Alpes (~44°30′N, 6°45′E). In Italy, the sample included 73 adults shot during 1997–2001 in two hunting districts in the Province of Verbania (~46°00′N, 8°30′E). We did not consider juveniles (3–4 months old) because they only occurred in small numbers in the shooting bags.

Dates of shooting varied from 15 September to 12 October in the Ariège and from 9 September to 11 November in the Hautes-Alpes. Shooting dates in Italy were 1 October to 28 November.

In France, we determined the sex of most birds by internal examination of the gonads. Age (adult or juvenile) was established by the presence or absence of the bursa of Fabricius. In the case of 18 birds not examined internally, age was determined by colour of primary wing feathers (Ellison & Léonard 1996), and sex was assessed by external plumage characteristics, including the colour and pattern of barring on body feathers. Jean-François Brenot verified this method of sex determination by examining the gonads of several birds.

In Italy, birds were not examined internally. Sex was determined by the presence or absence of the black loral stripe. This eye stripe appears in late September in males and is a reliable indicator of sex from October to May (Weeden 1964). Age was assessed from the wear and pigmentation of the two outermost primary wing feathers (Bocca 1984).

In all locations, body mass of birds, including the crop and its contents, was measured to the nearest 5 g either by us or by field assistants that we had trained.

Data analysis

We analysed the variations in body mass using linear models (McCullagh & Nelder 1989). Because birds might gain or lose mass during autumn, we studied the effect of date of shooting on mass by fitting the model: Mass = Sex + Location + Sex*Location + Date + Sex*Date + Location*Date + Sex*Location*Date. We then tested the effects written in italics with an analysis of variance, beginning with the interactions. In a second analysis, we studied the effects of sex and location by fitting the model: Mass = Sex + Location + Sex*Location + Year(Location) + Sex*Year(Location). Note that Year was nested within Location, i.e. it was assumed that a given year did not have the same effect in different locations. In this model, we first tested all interactions and then the main effects. We conducted all analyses using R software (R Development Core Team 2004).

Results

In the first analysis, after we withdrew the non-significant interaction terms, the effect of date was not significant (Table 1). Because mass showed no trend during the hunting season, we did not retain date in the second analysis. In the second analysis, the effect of year within location was nearly significant (see Table 1), but we removed this effect from the model because the P value of 0.061 was caused by one unusually small hen (350 g), which was the only hen weighed in 1998 in the Ariège. We also removed the other non-significant interaction terms from the initial model, allowing us to test for sex and location, both of which were highly significant (see Table 1). In the model Sex + Location, variances were homogeneous in cocks and hens, as well as in the three locations. Residuals of the model were also normally distributed. We conclude that body mass of both cocks and hens is greater in the Ariège than in the Hautes-Alpes, with birds in Italy occupying an intermediate position (Fig. 1, Table 2). The body mass of cocks exceeded that of hens by about 30 g in all three areas.

Table 1.

Models employed to first test the effect of date of shooting (D) on body mass of rock ptarmigan mass and then the effects of sex (S) and location (L). Y(L) = year (nested in location), + = additive effect, * = interactions.

i0909-6396-11-4-281-t01.gif

Figure 1.

Body mass (in g) of adult rock ptarmigan in the French Pyrenees (Ariège), the Italian Alps (province of Verbania) and the French Alps (Hautes-Alpes) with error bars indicating ± 1 standard error.

i0909-6396-11-4-281-f01.gif

Table 2.

Mean body mass (in g), standard error (SE) and range of adult rock ptarmigan in the French Pyrenees (Ariège), the French Alps (Hautes-Alpes) and the Italian Alps (Province of Verbania).

i0909-6396-11-4-281-t02.gif

Discussion

Our data on mean body mass of adult rock ptarmigan in the Hautes-Alpes are similar to those reported by Couturier (1964) for adults shot in autumn in the French Alps (Table 3). Mass of birds in the Italian Province of Verbania is similar to that of ptarmigan shot about 120 km to the east in the Italian Province of Sondrio (Scherini 1984; see Table 3). The Italian ptarmigan appear to be about 10–20 g heavier than those in the Hautes-Alpes. Couturier (1964) reported that rock ptarmigan were heavier in the Pyrenees than in the French Alps, and our results suggest a difference of about 20–30 g. Nevertheless, we believe that other populations in both mountain ranges should be sampled before concluding that this difference characterises the subspecies L. m. pyrenaicus and L. m. helveticus.

Table 3.

Mean body mass (in g) and range (figures in parentheses) of adult cocks and hens of four subspecies of rock ptarmigan in autumn in Europe.

i0909-6396-11-4-281-t03.gif

Within subspecies of rock ptarmigan and spruce grouse Dendragapus canadensis in North America, birds of northern populations tend to be heavier or larger in body dimensions than birds of southern populations (Browning 1979, Holder & Montgomerie 1993, Boag & Schroeder 1992). These trends coincide with Bergmann's rule, which states that mass is higher in cooler climates because small animals lose heat faster than large animals. However there are exceptions in tetraonids. For example, the opposite latitudinal trend occurs in ruffed grouse Bonasa umbellus (Rusch et al. 2000). Likewise, in our study, birds in the Ariège are heavier than those further north in the Hautes-Alpes and in Italy, despite the generally colder temperature in the Alps (Izard et al. 1985). On the other hand, the greater mass of L. m. millaisi in Scotland and of L. m. hyperboreus in Norway (see Table 3) suggests that at a continental scale in Europe, mass may increase with latitude.

The relatively large mass of rock ptarmigan in the Pyrenees does not correspond to the geographical trends observed in two other galliformes in France. The subspecies of capercaillie inhabiting the Pyrenees Tetrao urogallus aquitanicus is smaller than T. u. major living further north in the Jura and the Vosges (Ménoni & Corti 2000). Similarly, the grey partridge of the Pyrenees Perdix perdix hispaniensis is smaller than the subspecies P. p. perdix inhabiting the plains further north in France (Lescourret et al. 1987). The relationship in the partridges cannot be a simple matter of temperature because the climate is colder in the Pyrenean Mountains than in the lowland plains.

To explain the differences reported here, we believe that mass will have to be measured in many populations in the Pyrenees and the Alps because both environment (e.g. soil fertility, food quality, temperature) and genetics likely contribute to variation in body mass. Indeed habitat quality may contribute to large body size in the Pyrenees. Nearly all birds from the Ariège were shot in the commune of Aston, where summer and autumn habitats are comprised of areas with a rich ground cover of herbaceous and ericaceous plants, including bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus, bog whortleberry V. uliginosum and heather Calluna vulgaris. Bilberry is a nutrient-rich food (Moss & Watson 1984) that, if available, is selected by rock ptarmigan in all seasons (Watson 1964, Martinez 1985, Boudarel & Garcia-Gonzalez 1991). Bog whortleberry is the only ericaceous plant readily available to rock ptarmigan in the Hautes-Alpes (Bernard 1982), where the habitat tends to be composed of a sparse cover of sedges, grasses and decumbent woody plants, for example mountain azalea Loiseleuria procumbens, along with large expanses of stony ground (screes) and boulder fields. These habitats are also often heavily grazed by sheep, which may reduce food available to ptarmigan. On the average, habitats in the Italian Province of Verbania tend to be of intermediate quality. Birds were harvested on both poor areas resembling those in the Hautes-Alpes and on better areas where the vegetation is dominated by bilberry, whortleberry, willow Salix spp. and rhododendron Rhododendron ferrugineum.

Finally, it would be interesting to investigate in further studies if differences in body mass of rock ptarmigan in the Pyrenees and the Alps are correlated with demographic parameters. Across species of tetraonids, incubation period and clutch mass (egg mass times clutch size), but not clutch size, increase with body mass (Sæther & Andersen 1988) and within galliformes low population turnover rates, and thus low sustained harvests, tend to be associated with high body mass (Trouvilliez et al. 1987).

Acknowledgments

We thank the numerous hunters in France and Italy who presented their birds for examination. We appreciate the constructive comments of Ariane Bernard-Laurent on an earlier draft of the manuscript, and those of three reviewers.

References

1.

A. Bernard 1982. Note sur le régime alimentaire automnal du lagopède alpin (Lagopus mutus Montin) dans les Alpes du Sud.-. Bulletin Mensuel Office National de la Chasse 55:20–23. (In French). Google Scholar

2.

D. A. Boag and M. A. Schroeder . 1992. Spruce grouse.-. In A. Poole, P. Stettenheim, and F. Gill , editors. (Eds.). The Birds of North America, No. 5. The Academy of Natural Sciences. Philadelphia. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. 28. pp. Google Scholar

3.

M. Bocca 1984. Pernice bianca, fagiano di monte, coturnice. Determinazione del sesso e dell'età dei capi abbattuti durante la stagione venatoria autunnale: Criteri generali per la determinazione dell'età. Regione Autonoma Valle d'Aosta.-. Assessorato Agricoltura, Foreste e Ambiente Naturale. Servizio tutela dell'ambiente naturale e delle foreste. 4. pp. (In Italian). Google Scholar

4.

P. Boudarel and R. Garcia-Gonzalez . 1991. Approche du régime alimentaire du lagopède alpin (Lagopus mutus pyrenaicus) dans les Pyrénées occidentales - printemps, été et automne.-. Acta biologica montana 10:11–23. (In French). Google Scholar

5.

M. R. Browning 1979. Distribution, geographic variation, and taxonomy of Lagopus mutus in Greenland and northern Canada.-. Dansk ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift 73:29–40. Google Scholar

6.

M. Couturier 1964. Le gibier des montagnes françaises. Deuxième édition.-. Bellegarde. Arthaud. 471. pp. (In French). Google Scholar

7.

L. Ellison and P. Léonard . 1996. Validation d'un critère d'âge chez le lagopède alpin (Lagopus mutus) et sexe et âge ratios dans des tableaux de chasse des Alpes et des Pyrénées. (In French with an English summary: Validation of determining age of rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) from wings, and sex and age ratios in shooting bags in the Alps and Pyrenees.).-. Gibier Faune Sauvage 13:1495–1509. Google Scholar

8.

K. Holder and R. Montgomerie . 1993. Rock ptarmigan.-. In A. Poole and F. Gill , editors. (Eds.). The Birds of North America, No. 51. The Academy of Natural Sciences. Philadelphia. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. 24. pp. Google Scholar

9.

M. Izard, H. Casanova, B. Devau, and G. Pautou . 1985. Continentalité et notion de zone interne dans les Pyrénées. (In French with an English summary: Continental climate and the notion of an internal zone in the Pyrenees.).-. Acta Œcologica Œcologia Generalis 6:317–344. Google Scholar

10.

N. W. Kahn, C. E. Braun, J. R. Young, S. Wood, D. R. Mata, and T. W. Quinn . 1999. Molecular analysis of genetic variation among large- and small-bodied sage grouse using mitochondrial control-region sequences.-. Auk 116:819–824. Google Scholar

11.

F. Lescourret, M. Birkan, and C. Novoa . 1987. Aspects particuliers de la morphologie de la perdrix grise des Pyrénées, Perdix perdix hispaniensis R., et comparaison avec la perdrix grise de Beauce, apparentée à Perdix perdix perdix L. (In French with an English summary: Morphological characteristics of the Pyrenean grey partridge, Perdix perdix hispaniensis R., compared to the Beaucean grey partridge, related to Perdix perdix perdix L.).-. Gibier Faune Sauvage 4:49–66. Google Scholar

12.

C. Martinez 1985. Autumn food of the ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus Montin, 1776) in the Spanish Central Pyrenees.-. Doñana, Acta Vertebrata 12:174–181. Google Scholar

13.

P. McCullagh and J. A. Nelder . 1989. Generalized linear models. Second Edition.-. Chapman & Hall. London. 511. pp. Google Scholar

14.

E. Ménoni and R. Corti . 2000. Le grand tétras.-. Brochure technique. Office National de la Chasse. Paris. 36. pp. (In French). Google Scholar

15.

A. Mortensen, E. S. Nordøy, and A. S. Blix . 1985. Seasonal changes in the body composition of the Norwegian rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus.-. Ornis Scandinavica 16:25–28. Google Scholar

16.

R. Moss and A. Watson . 1984. Maternal nutrition, egg quality and breeding success of Scottish ptarmigan Lagopus mutus.-. Ibis 126:212–220. Google Scholar

17.

R Development Core Team 2004. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.-. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Austria. Available at:  http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar

18.

D. H. Rusch, S. Destefano, M. C. Reynolds, and D. Lauten . 2000. Ruffed grouse.-. In A. Poole and F. Gill , editors. (Eds.). The Birds of North America, No. 515. Philadelphia. Pennsylvania. 28. pp. Google Scholar

19.

B-E. Sæther and R. Andersen . 1988. Ecological consequences of body size in grouse Tetraonidae.-. Fauna Norvegicus Series C, Cinclus 11:19–26. Google Scholar

20.

G. C. Scherini 1984. La pernice bianca. Studio dell'alimentazione della pernice bianca in Provincia di Sondrio (Alpi Retiche e Orobiche). (In Italian with an English summary: The rock ptarmigan: food habits in the Province of Sondrio.). Unione Nazionale Cacciatori Zona Alpi. Vicenza. 52. pp. Google Scholar

21.

M. H. Sherfy and P. J. Pekins . 1994. The influence of season, temperature, and absorptive state on sage grouse metabolism.-. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72:898–903. Google Scholar

22.

S. C. Stearns 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 249. pp. Google Scholar

23.

J. Trouvilliez, J-M. Gaillard, D. Allaine, and D. Pontier . 1987. Stratégies démographiques et gestion des populations chez les oiseaux: particularités des galliformes. (In French with an English summary: Demographic strategies and management of bird populations: characteristics of galliformes.). Colloque Galliformes de Montagne. Office National de la Chasse & Service de la Recherche, des Études et du Traitement de l'Information sur l'Environnement. Grenoble. pp. 37–51. Google Scholar

24.

A. Watson 1964. The food of rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) in Scotland.-. The Scottish Naturalist 71:60–66. Google Scholar

25.

A. Watson 1987. Weight and sexual cycle of Scottish rock ptarmigan.-. Ornis Scandinavica 18:231–232. Google Scholar

26.

R. B. Weeden 1964. Spatial separation of sexes in rock and willow ptarmigan in winter.-. Auk 81:534–541. Google Scholar

27.

R. H. Wiley 1974. Evolution of social organization and life-history patterns among grouse.-. Quarterly Review of Biology 49:201–227. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Article accepted for publication in Game and Wildlife Science (GWS) prior to the merger between Wildlife Biology and GWS. Therefore, this article has not been peer-reviewed by Wildlife Biology Associate Editors

Jean-François Brenot, Laurence Ellison, Luca Rotelli, Claude Novoa, Clément Calenge, Patrick Léonard, and Emmanuel Ménoni "Geographic variation in body mass of rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus in the Alps and the Pyrenees," Wildlife Biology 11(4), 281-285, (1 December 2005). https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2005)11[281:GVIBMO]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 December 2005
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top