Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2009 Combined Effects of Drought and Density on Body and Antler Size of Male Iberian Red Deer Cervus Elaphus Hispanicus: Climate Change Implications
Jerónimo Torres-Porras, Juan Carranza, Javier Pérez-González
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Hunting management of red deer Cervus elaphus populations may tend to increase population densities to maximise annual yield. Some studies have shown that density and low winter temperatures affect red deer populations in central and northern Europe, but these results cannot be extrapolated to red deer populations in the Mediterranean region where the limiting season is summer instead of winter. The two regions are predicted to experience different climate change effects: while rainfall may increase in northern latitudes, heavier droughts are expected in the Mediterranean region. We studied red deer populations of different densities on 19 hunting estates in southern Spain during two years with contrasting precipitation levels. Our aim was to quantify the combined effects of drought and population density on the development of stags, which is the main economic objective of hunting management in these areas. We found that drought affected body and antler size negatively, and that the effects were more severe in populations of high density. On the basis of our results, we recommend reducing the current densities of red deer in southern Spain to maintain the economic and environmental sustainability of hunting exploitation in the context of global climate change.

The warming of the climate is likely to be associated with changes in the distribution of precipitation throughout the world (IPCC 2007a). Studies on climate change indicate that the effects are likely to differ with latitude, resulting for instance in precipitation increments in northern Europe but reductions in more southerly Mediterranean areas, leading to increased risk of drought periods and fires in the south (IPCC 2007b). On the Iberian Peninsula, declines in rainfall are likely to be particularly marked in spring (MMA 2005), which may considerably worsen conditions during the dry and hot summer. Several studies have shown that local climatic variations affect ungulates in the northern hemisphere (e.g. Clutton-Brock & Albon 1989, Loison & Langvatn 1998, Coulson et al. 2000), but reports on the effects of climatic conditions on deer populations in southwestern Europe are very rare (Azorit et al. 2002).

The climate of southern Spain is very different from that of central and northern Europe. In northern latitudes, winter is the limiting season for growth and reproduction of ungulates as cold temperatures and snow reduce the food available to deer (Klein 1985), causing lower birth weights and increased mortality (Mitchell et al. 1976, Clutton-Brock & Albon 1982, Loison et al. 1999). In the Mediterranean, however, the limiting season is summer, when food availability is at its annual minimum and most herbaceous plants dry up, and deer have to increase browsing on less preferred shrub species (Rodríguez-Berrocal 1993, Bugalho & Milne 2003). Consequently, the effects of climate change on deer populations in northern Europe may not apply to deer populations in southern Europe.

Knowing the potential effects of drought on the development and reproduction of deer in these areas is of considerable importance, both from the point of view of the phenotypic plasticity of the characters involved (Emlen 1994, Gross 1996, Tomkins et al. 2005) and from its application to hunting management and conservation (Vargas et al. 1995, Carranza 1999, San Miguel et al. 1999). The objectives in our study were 1) to quantify the effects of current drought periods on the development of red deer Cervus elaphus stags, which constitute the objective of game management in these areas, and, as a result of this knowledge, 2) to provide practical recommendations in the face of expected changes in local climatic conditions, in order to maintain the sustainability of red deer populations in this region from the point of view of hunting exploitation and ecosystem conservation.

Material and methods

Our study area is located in the southern part of the Iberian Peninsula in Sierra Morena, a chain of low mountains covered by Mediterranean shrub and forest. The main tree species in this area are holm oak Quercus ilex and cork oak Quercus suber, which usually coexist with a wide variety of shrub species of which Cistus is the most abundant genus. There are also plantation areas with pine trees Pinus sp. The climate is characterised by mild, rainy winters and dry, hot summers. Our fieldwork was carried out in 2004 and 2005, the latter being an extremely dry year with a total annual rainfall of only 341.6 mm, while in 2004 total annual rainfall was 608.8 mm. Average annual rainfall in the region during the seven years prior to our study period was 595.97 ± 124.28 SD (Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca), and thus 2004 can be considered normal for the area on the basis of rainfall, whereas 2005 was an extremely dry year.

Our study area included 19 hunting estates with a mean size of ca 1,300 ha. Some of these estates (6) were surrounded by 2 m high perimeter wire fences which prevented deer from leaving the area. The presence or absence of fences leads to marked differences in management which in turn affects the structure of populations (Carranza 1999). In particular, when the estate is fenced, the owner is able to manage the population inside the fence without interference by neighbouring managers. Stags in fenced areas are normally allowed to reach maturity whereas in open estates they are hunted at a much younger age, and the sex ratio of the population tends to maintain a strong female bias. We will consider these two types of estates when analysing the effects of drought and density.

To check the variations in food availability between the two years of study, we measured grass height in spring (April-May) at the same fixed points (N = 46) distributed throughout the study estates. Deer density on each estate was estimated by counting animals seen at open mating areas during late afternoon in September, when the animals gather at mating areas and are therefore more visible (Carranza et al. 1996). Since an indeterminate number of animals may remain outside the mating areas, we considered our estimation to be a minimum value of density. Density was used in the analyses as a two-level categorical factor, for which we arbitrarily used 0.3 deer per ha as the cut off point for the two levels of density.

We measured 415 stags in 21 hunts (monterías; 12 in 2004 and nine in 2005). In the type of hunt called montería, packs of dogs are released within a shrub area to move the deer outwards to the sites where hunters are waiting, and hunting pressure on males is essentially regulated by only allowing one montería per year in the same area. Because hunters are normally allowed to shoot any male over two years old there is little opportunity for hunting to bias particular males, and montería is the least biased procedure to obtain data from hunted red deer (Martínez et al. 2005). From animals culled in monterías, we measured body length and heart girth (to the nearest 0.5 cm) in the following way: body length was measured from the tip of the snout to the tip of the tail, excluding the hair and following the dorsal contour of the body of the animal lying on the ground; heart girth was measured as the chest perimeter behind the forelegs. The following antler measurements (to the nearest 0.1 cm) were also taken in the field:

  • Antler length was measured from the burr (included) to the longest tip of the antler.

  • Burr circumference was measured as the perimeter of the basal bone protrusion of the antler.

  • Antler thickness was measured as the perimeter around the main trunk of the antler measured between the brow-tine and the trez-tine.

  • Number of antler points was taken as the total number of tines ≥ 2 cm on both antlers.

We were unable to weigh the animals used in this work, but heart girth has been proven to be a good proxy of body weight for red deer in Spain (Alarcos 2007). It was not possible to take all measurements for all individuals, so our sample sizes differ among measurements. For analyses we used average values for both antlers.

Mandibles were removed for determination of deer age in the laboratory. Age was estimated by counting cementum growth marks at the interradicular pad under the first molar (Mitchell 1967), and checked by eruption patterns in younger animals. We expressed age in completed years from birth, so an animal aged N is living its N+1 year of life.

We used covariance analyses (ANCOVA) to explore the differences in grass height between the two years of study regarding the date. To investigate whether independent factors influenced morphological variables, we used a Linear Mixed Model fitted by restricted maximum likelihood (REML: SPSS software version 11, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.). Age of individuals and its quadratic term were introduced in the analyses to control for the non-linear relationship between age and morphological variables. Other fixed factors were year (2004 and 2005), fence (whether the estate was or was not fenced) and density (above or below 0.3 deer per ha). Estates were introduced in the model as random factors. This model showed the best-fitting values of the information criteria (-2 Restricted Log Likelihood and Akaike's Information Criterion, AIC). We followed a backward stepwise procedure, by first including all fixed terms and their double and triple interactions, thereafter removing non-significant interactions up to the final model which included the fixed factors and significant interactions.

We present predicted values from the final models in figures for all individuals included in the analyses except in the case of body length. For this variable, the interaction between the factors age and year was significant, indicating that the poor year only affected some ages (younger ones). Hence, we present the predicted values for younger males (1–4 years old and still growing; Alarcos 2007).

Results

Food availability differed markedly between 2004 and 2005. The height of the grass in spring 2004 and 2005 was 21.52 cm ± 1.84 (SE) and 7.00 cm ± 1.84 (SE), respectively (ANCOVA: F = 25.33, df = 1, 89, P < 0.001), which fitted with the difference in rainfall between the two years.

For body size variables, density had a significant effect on body length and only marginally on heart girth (Table 1). The significant interaction between density and fence for body length (see Table 1) occurred because density only showed an effect on body length in fenced estates, while in non-fenced estates body length was equally low either at high or low density. The effect of drought (year factor) was not significant for heart girth. Body length, however, was strongly affected by drought conditions in year 2005, but the significant interaction with age indicated that the effect was only to reduce body growth of young males (see Table 1 and Fig. 1).

Antler size was affected mainly by fence, i.e. one or more of the variables antler length, burr, thickness or number of tines increased notably under fenced conditions (see Table 1 and Fig. 2). Antler length was more sensitive to density, and when density is high may completely outweigh the effect offence, whereas all the remaining antler variables were more sensitive to drought conditions (see Table 1). The variables related to antler thickness and points showed reduced values for 2005 under all conditions of density and presence/absence offence (see Fig. 2), although there was very little reduction in these values in fenced populations under conditions of low density (see Fig. 2) and these interactions were not significant (not shown).

For all morphological variables studied, we found significant differences between open and fenced estates, indicating that the conditions imposed by different management and hunting pressure in these types of estates have a clear impact on the size of stags, even after controlling by age.

The effect of year and other independent factors on antler size was not caused by differences in body size in general, since when we controlled by body length (which was significantly affected by year and other independent factors), antler size was still affected by year, fence and density (Table 2).

Discussion

Our results show that drought conditions negatively affected body and antler size. Body size was more affected in young males, which have not completed body growth (Clutton-Brock et al. 1982, Alarcos 2007), but antlers were affected in individuals of all ages. Also, the effects on antlers remained after controlling by body size, indicating lower allocation of resources to antlers relative to body during adverse environmental conditions (Mysterud et al. 2005) like a dry year in Mediterranean habitats.

Table 1.

Mixed model (REML) results for the influence of independent variables on the different measures of body and antler size in the two years of study. Hunting estates were introduced in models as random factors. Fixed factors were year, fence and density, as well as age and age2, which were introduced to control for the quadratic relationship with morphology. Only significant interactions were included. Parameter estimates and standard errors are shown for year 2005, fenced estates and high density with respect to their alternatives, when significant.

t01_213.gif

Figure 1.

Body size of red deer males (predicted values from REML Mixed Models) as a function of independent factors in the two years of study: A) body length of young males (1–4 years old) as a function of density, presence or absence of perimeter fence in the estate, and year; B) predicted heart girth of all males as a function of density, presence or absence of perimeter fence, and year.

f01_213.eps

Male body size in red deer (Loison & Langvatn 1998) and other cervid species (Leberg & Smith 1993, Ferguson et al. 2000) mostly depends on resource availability, which is also greatly influenced by population density (Bonenfant et al. 2002, Weladji & Holand 2003). The phenology and key factors that limit deer performance in northern and southern regions of Europe are markedly different. While low winter temperatures determine the limiting season in many northern areas of red deer distribution (Klein 1985), high temperatures and absence of rainfall during the summer in Mediterranean habitats reduce vegetation productivity and resource availability for deer, thus making summer the limiting season for herbivores in Mediterranean areas (Carranza et al. 1990, Carranza 1995, Rodríguez-Berrocal 1993, Bugalho & Milne 2003).

Our data show that larger body and antler size are produced in fenced rather than open areas. The main difference between the two types of estates is that in fenced areas managers can maintain sex ratio equilibrium and age structure of the population, including mature stags, whereas in open areas hunting pressure from neighbouring estates affects the whole population, leading to strongly female biased sex ratios and age structures which are heavily skewed towards younger males (Carranza 1999; see also Langvatn & Loison 1999). Contrasting sex ratios and population structure between fenced and open estates are likely to affect male growth and antler development (Singer & Zeingenfuss 2002, Yoccoz et al. 2002, Mysterud et al. 2003), although this issue deserves further research.

Our data show that in open estates the effects of density are not apparent, probably because deer can move freely according to the availability of resources in each area at different times of the year, so the observed differences in density may not reflect differences in competitive conditions. In fenced estates, on the contrary, high density related to marked decreases in body and antler sizes when environmental conditions deteriorated, suggesting that these estates were maintaining deer densities according to an optimum level for average years but probably too high for drier years.

Elevated densities under drier conditions have implications not only for the economy of hunting exploitation but also for the conservation of natural vegetation. Red deer management in fenced estates is normally oriented towards the improvement of trophies (antler size), therefore density should be reduced to maintain performance under conditions of low rainfall. However, our data also show that drought conditions affected body growth in young males. Growth during the first year of life has been demonstrated to have a strong influence on the future development of antlers in red deer (Clutton-Brock et al. 1982, Schmidt et al. 2001). Thus, a single year with poor conditions might have lifetime consequences for a complete cohort of stags (Albon et al. 1987, Langvatn et al. 1996, Post et al. 1997, Rose et al. 1998, Kruuk et al. 1999, Lindström 1999, Forchhammer et al. 2001).

Figure 2.

Antler size of red deer males (predicted values from REML Mixed Models) as a function of density and the presence of perimeter fence in the estate for the two years of study; A) antler length, B) burr circumference, C) antler thickness, and D) number of antler tines (see Table 1 for model results).

f02_213.eps

Table 2.

Mixed model (REML) results for the influence of independent variables on the four measures of antler size in the two years of study, controlled by body size. Hunting estates were introduced in models as random factors. Fixed factors were year, fence and density, the covariates were body length as well as age and age2, which were introduced to control for the quadratic relationship with morphology. Only significant interactions were included. Parameter estimates and standard errors are shown for year 2005, fenced estates and high density with respect to their alternatives, when significant.

t02_213.gif

Our results indicate a likely effect of climate change on red deer populations in the Iberian Peninsula through potential impacts on natural vegetation, and we recommend adapting population composition and management to the likely new scenario of reduced productivity of natural vegetation. Thus, the density should match a new optimum according to the expected productivity. On the other hand, our results also show that populations in fenced estates are more sensitive to environmental changes. Stags in fenced areas show larger body and antler size but they also suffer more dramatic reductions under worsening conditions. This suggests that fenced areas will experience higher impacts from climate change under current management practices and we therefore recommend that the sustainability of this type of management should be reviewed.

Acknowledgements -

Our study was conducted through a collaborative agreement between the University of Extremadura and ‘Consejería de Medio Ambiente’ of ‘Junta de Andalucía’. We thank R. Arenas and the staff at ‘Consejería de Medio Ambiente’ in Córdoba, as well as L. Arias de Reyna of the University of Córdoba, for their support at different stages of our study. We are also grateful to the owners and wardens of the estates studied and to the hunters. P. Montero, S. Alarcos, J.M. Seoane, M.J. Taboada, I. Parrillo, O. Linares, C. Sánchez-Prieto, L. Castillo, M. Núñez and M.J. Brito helped in fieldwork. A. Mysterud made helpful comments to previous versions of the manuscript. This work complies with current Spanish laws. Additional financial support came from Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, projects CGL2004-05993 and CGL2007-63594.

References

1.

S. Alarcos 2007: Consecuencias de las estrategias reproductivas de machos y hembras sobre la morfología, desarrollo y longevidad del ciervo ibérico. - Doctoral thesis, University of Extremadura, 300 pp. (In Spanish). Google Scholar

2.

S.D. Albon , T.H. Clutton-Brock & F.E. Guinness 1987: Early development and population dynamics in red deer. II. Density independent effects and cohort variation. - Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 69–81. Google Scholar

3.

C. Azorit , M. Analla , R. Carrasco & J. Muñoz-Cobo 2002: Influence of age and environment on antler traits in Spanish red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). - Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 48: 137–144. Google Scholar

4.

C. Bonenfant , J-M. Gaillard , F. Klein & A. Loison 2002: Sex- and age-dependent effects of population density on life history traits of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a temperate forest. - Ecography 25: 446–458. Google Scholar

5.

M.N. Bugalho & J.A. Milne 2003: The composition of the diet of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Mediterranean environment: a case of summer nutritional constraint? Forest Ecology and Management 181(1-2): 23–29. Google Scholar

6.

J. Carranza 1995: Female attraction by males versus sites in territorial rutting red deer. - Animal Behaviour 50: 445–453. Google Scholar

7.

J. Carranza 1999: Aplicaciones de la Etología al manejo de las poblaciones de ciervo en el suroeste de la Península Ibérica: producción y conservación. - Etología 7: 5–18. (In Spanish). Google Scholar

8.

J. Carranza , F. Alvarez & T. Redondo 1990: Territoriality as a mating strategy in red deer. - Animal Behaviour 40: 79–88. Google Scholar

9.

J. Carranza , P. Fernández-Llario & M. Gomendio 1996: Correlates of territoriality in rutting red deer. Ethology 102: 793–805. Google Scholar

10.

T.H. Clutton-Brock & S.D. Albon 1982: Winter mortality in red deer (Cervus elaphus). - Journal of Zoology 198(4): 515–519. Google Scholar

11.

T.H. Clutton-Brock & S.D. Albon 1989: Red deer in the highlands. - Oxford, BSP Professional Books, 244 pp. Google Scholar

12.

T.H. Clutton-Brock , F. Guinness & S.D. Albon 1982: Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. - The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 378 pp. Google Scholar

13.

T. Coulson , E.J. Milner-Gulland & T. Clutton-Brock 2000: The relative roles of density and climatic variation on population dynamics and fecundity rates in three contrasting ungulate species. - Proceedings of the Royal Society London 267: 1771–1779. Google Scholar

14.

D.J. Emlen 1994: Environmental control of horn length dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). - Proceedings of the Royal Society B 256: 131–136. Google Scholar

15.

S.H. Ferguson , A.R. Bisset & F. Messier 2000: The influences of density on growth and reproduction in moose Alces dices. - Wildlife Biology 6(1): 31–39. Google Scholar

16.

M. C. Forchhammer , T.H. Clutton-Brock , J. Lindström & S.D. Albon 2001: Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. - Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 721–729. Google Scholar

17.

M.R. Gross 1996: Alternative reproductive tactics: diversity within sexes. - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 92–98. Google Scholar

18.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007a: Climate Change 2007. - The Physical Science Basis, Switzerland, 21 pp. Google Scholar

19.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007b: Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Change 2007, . Synthesis Report, Valencia Spain, 52 pp. Google Scholar

20.

D.R. Klein 1985: Population ecology: the interaction between deer and their food supply. - In: P.F. Fennessy & K.R. Drew (Eds.); Biology of Deer Production, vol. 22. Royal Society of New Zealand, pp. 13–22. Google Scholar

21.

L.E.B. Kruuk , T.H. Clutton-Brock , K.E. Rose & F.E. Guinness 1999: Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between sexes in red deer. -Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 266: 1655–1661. Google Scholar

22.

R. Langvatn , S.D. Albon , T. Burkey & T.H. Glutton-Brock 1996: Climate, Plant Phenology and Variation in Age of First Reproduction in a Temperate Herbivore. - The Journal of Animal Ecology 65(5): 653–670. Google Scholar

23.

R. Langvatn & A. Loison 1999: Consequences of harvesting on age structure, sex ratio and population dynamics of red deer Cervus elaphus in central Norway. - Wildlife Biology 5(4): 213–223. Google Scholar

24.

P.L. Leberg & M.H. Smith 1993: Influence of density on growth of white-tailed deer. - Journal of Mammalogy 74: 723–731. Google Scholar

25.

J. Lindström 1999: Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 343–348. Google Scholar

26.

A. Loison & R. Langvatn 1998: Short- and long-term effects of winter and spring weather on growth and survival of red deer in Norway. - Oecologia 116: 489–500. Google Scholar

27.

A. Loison , R. Langvatn & E.J. Solberg 1999: Body mass and winter mortality in red deer calves: disentangling sex and climate effects. - Ecography 22: 20–30. Google Scholar

28.

M. Martínez , C. Rodriguez-Vigal , O.R. Jones , T. Coulson & A. San Miguel 2005: Different hunting strategies select for different weights in red deer. - Biology Letters 1: 353–356. Google Scholar

29.

Ministerio Medio Ambiente 2005: Evaluación Preliminar de los Impactos en España por Efecto del Cambio Climático. - Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 822 pp. (In Spanish). Google Scholar

30.

B. Mitchell 1967: Growth layers in dental cement food for determining the age of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). - Journal of Animal Ecology 36: 279–293. Google Scholar

31.

B. Mitchell , D. McCowan & I.A. Nicholson 1976: Annual cycles of body weight and condition in Scottish red deer, Cervus elaphus. - Journal of Zoology 180: 107–127. Google Scholar

32.

A. Mysterud , Ø. Holand , K.H. Røed , H. Gjøstein , J. Kumpula & M. Nieminen 2003: Effects of age, density and sex ratio on reproductive effort in male reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). - Journal of Zoology 261: 341–344. Google Scholar

33.

A. Mysterud , E. Meisingset , R. Langvatn , N.G. Yoccoz & N.C. Stenseth 2005: Climate-dependent allocation of resources to secondary sexual traits in red deer. - Oikos 111: 245–252. Google Scholar

34.

E. Post , N.C. Stenseth , R. Langvatn & J.M. Fromentin 1997: Global climate change and phenotypic variation among red deer cohorts. - Proceedings of the Royal Society London 264: 1317–1324. Google Scholar

35.

J. Rodríguez-Berrocal 1993: Utilización de los recursos alimenticios naturales. Nutrición y alimentación de rumiantes silvestres. - Publicaciones Facultad de Veterinaria, Córdoba, 210 pp. (In Spanish). Google Scholar

36.

K.E. Rose , T.H. Clutton-Brock & F.E. Guinness 1998: Cohort variation in male survival and lifetime breeding success in red deer. - Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 979–986. Google Scholar

37.

A. San Miguel , C. Pérez-Carral & S. Roig 1999: Deer and traditional agrosilvopastoral systems of Mediterranean Spain. A new problem of sustainability for a new concept of land use. - Options Méditerranéennes 39: 261–264. Google Scholar

38.

K.T. Schmidt , A. Stien , S.D. Albon & F.E. Guinness 2001: Antler length of yearling red deer is determined by population density, weather and early life-history. - Oecologia 127: 191–197. Google Scholar

39.

F.J. Singer & L.C. Zeingenfuss 2002: Influence of trophy hunting and horn size on mating behavior and survivorship of mountain sheep. - Journal of Mammalogy 83: 682–698. Google Scholar

40.

J.L. Tomkins , J.S. Kotiaho & N.R. Lebas 2005: Phenotypic plasticity in the developmental integration of morphological tradeoffs and secondary sexual trait compensation. - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272: 543–551. Google Scholar

41.

J.D. Vargas , J.C. Calvo & M.A. Aparicio 1995: Red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) management in the dehesa system in central Extremadura, Spain. - Agroforestry Systems 29(1): 77–89. Google Scholar

42.

R.B. Weladji & O. Holand 2003: Global climate change and reindeer: effects of winter weather on the autumn weight and growth of calves. - Oecologia 136: 317–323. Google Scholar

43.

N.G. Yoccoz , A. Mysterud , R. Langvatn & N.C. Stenseth 2002: Age and density-dependent reproductive effort in male red deer. - Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 269: 1523–1529. Google Scholar
© Wildlife Biology, NKV
Jerónimo Torres-Porras, Juan Carranza, and Javier Pérez-González "Combined Effects of Drought and Density on Body and Antler Size of Male Iberian Red Deer Cervus Elaphus Hispanicus: Climate Change Implications," Wildlife Biology 15(2), 213-221, (1 June 2009). https://doi.org/10.2981/08-059
Received: 3 September 2008; Accepted: 30 January 2009; Published: 1 June 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Cervus elaphus
density
drought
game management
global climate change
Iberian red deer
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top