BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
5 August 2024 Stronger together: different community science platforms all contribute to wildlife research
Lucas Rodriguez Forti, Ana Marta P. R. da Silva Passetti, Talita Oliveira, Kauane Freitas, Guilherme de Freitas Costa, Juan Victor de Lima Maia, Arthur Queiros, Maria Alice Dantas Ferreira Lopes, Judit K. Szabo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Context. Engaging the general public can increase spatio-temporal coverage of wildlife monitoring. Given the potentially substantial costs, we need to evaluate the contribution of known and planned initiatives and confirm whether multiple platforms increase the efficiency of data collection. As observer behaviour affects data quantity and quality, users of specialised and generalist platforms are expected to behave differently, resulting in more connected networks for specialised and higher nestedness for generalist platforms. Specialist observers are expected to contribute a balanced ratio of rare and common species, whereas non-specialist contribution will depend more on species detectability.

Aims. We aim to evaluate whether the combined contribution of observers from different platforms can improve the quality of occurrence and distribution data of 218 endemic Atlantic Forest bird species in Brazil. We also describe and compare observer-bird species interaction networks to illustrate observer behaviour on different platforms.

Methods. On the basis of data from five community science platforms in Brazil, namely, eBird, WikiAves, Biofaces, iNaturalist and Táxeus, we compared the spatial distribution of bird observations, the number of observers, the presence of the same observers on various platforms, bird species coverage, and the proportion of duplicate observations within and among platforms.

Key results. Although species coverage of the joint dataset increased by up to 100%, spatial completeness among the five platforms was low. The network of individual platforms had low values of clustering, and the network of the joint dataset had low connectance and high nestedness.

Conclusions. Each platform had a somewhat unique contribution. Pooling these datasets and integrating them with standardised data can inform our knowledge on bird distributions and trends in this fragile biome. Nevertheless, we encourage observers to provide precise coordinates, dates and other data (and platforms to accommodate such data) and recommend submitting data from all platforms into the Global Biodiversity Information Facility to support wildlife research and conservation.

Implications. If new platforms engage more and different people, new initiatives can cover poorly represented areas and successfully expand monitoring effort for Atlantic Forest endemic bird species.

Lucas Rodriguez Forti, Ana Marta P. R. da Silva Passetti, Talita Oliveira, Kauane Freitas, Guilherme de Freitas Costa, Juan Victor de Lima Maia, Arthur Queiros, Maria Alice Dantas Ferreira Lopes, and Judit K. Szabo "Stronger together: different community science platforms all contribute to wildlife research," Wildlife Research 51(8), (5 August 2024). https://doi.org/10.1071/WR23160
Received: 26 December 2023; Accepted: 11 July 2024; Published: 5 August 2024
KEYWORDS
biodiversity
Brazil
citizen science
conservation
mobile nature apps
network analysis
participatory monitoring
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top