Translator Disclaimer
7 August 2000 The genus Psephellus Cass. (Compositae, Cardueae) revisited with a broadened concept
Gerhard Wagenitz, Frank H. Hellwig
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A new concept of the genus Psephellus is presented on the basis of morphological, anatomical, palynological and caryological evidence. The few molecular data seem to confirm the monophyly of the genus. The following former sections of Centaurea are included: C. sect. Psephelloideae, Psephellus, Hyalinella, Aetheopappus, Amblyopogon, Heterolophus, Czerniakovskya, Odontolophoideae, Odontolophus, Xanthopsis, Uralepis and Sosnovskya. New combinations under Psephellus are provided for these sections and for 35 species, especially from Turkey and Iran. Psephellus in this broadened sense has 75–80 species and a distribution with a centre in E Anatolia, Caucasia and NW Iran; only few species occur outside this area. Close relationships exist between different sections despite considerable differences especially in the characters of the pappus.

See the PDF.

References

1.

E. M. Avetisjan 1964: K palinosistematike nekotoryh rodov triby Centaureinae semejstva Asteraceae. — Trudy Bot. Inst. Akad. Nauk Armjansk. S.S.R. 14: 31–47. Google Scholar

2.

G. Bakshi Khaniki 1995: Meiotic studies on some Iranian Centaurea (Compositae). — Cytologia 60: 341–346. Google Scholar

3.

E. Boissier 1875: Flora orientalis 3. — Basel & Genève. Google Scholar

4.

E. G. Bobrov & S. K. Čerepanov (ed.) 1963: Flora SSSR 28. — Moskva & Leningrad. Google Scholar

5.

K. Bremer 1994: Asteraceae: Cladistics and classification. — Portland. Google Scholar

6.

S. K. Čerepanov 1963: Centaurea podrod 9. Sosnovskya (Takht.) Czer. comb. nova. — Pp. 477–481 in: E. G. Bobrov & S. K. Čerepanov (ed.), Flora SSSR 28. — Moskva & Leningrad. Google Scholar

7.

N. A. Čuksanova , L. I. Svešnikova & T. V. Alexandrova 1968: Novyie dannye o čislah hromosom u vidov semejstva sloznocvetnyh. [Data on the karyology of the family Compositae Giseke]. — Citologija [Tsitologija] 10: 198–206. Google Scholar

8.

N. Cvelev 1959: Kritičeskie zametki o nekotoryh sekzijah roda Centaurea L. [Notulae criticae de sectionibus nonnullis generis Centaureae L.] — Bot. Mater. Gerb. Bot. Inst. Komarova Akad. Nauk SSSR 19: 409–441. Google Scholar

9.

N. Cvelev 1963: Centaurea podrod 13. Hyalinella (Tzvel.) Tzvel. comb. nova. — Pp. 488–493 in: E. G. Bobrov & S. K. Čerepanov (ed.), Fl. SSSR 28. — Moskva & Leningrad. Google Scholar

10.

M. T. Davlianidze 1985: Čisla hromosom predstavitelej semejstv Asteraceae, Boraginaceae, Brassicaceae, Liliaceae, Fabaceae, Paeoniaceae, Poaceae, Primulaceae, Ranunculaceae, Rosaceae flory Gruzinskoj SSR. [Chromosome numbers in the representatives of the flora from Georgia]. — Bot. Žurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 70: 698–700. Google Scholar

11.

M. Dittrich 1968: Karpologische Untersuchungen zur Systematik von Centaurea und verwandten Gattungen. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 88: 79–162. Google Scholar

12.

M. Dittrich 1977: Cynareae — systematic review. — Pp. 999–1015 in: V. H. Heywood , J. B. Harborne & B. L. Turner (ed.), The biology and chemistry of the Compositae 2. — London, etc. Google Scholar

13.

J. Dostál 1973: Preliminary notes on the subtribe Centaureinae. — Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 19: 73–79. Google Scholar

14.

A. A. Fedorov (ed.) 1969: Hromosomnye čisla cvetkovyh rastenij. [Chromosome numbers of flowering plants]. — Leningrad. Google Scholar

15.

E. Gabrieljan 1988: Obzor vidov podroda Xanthopsis (DC.) Tzvel. roda Centaurea L. (Asteraceae). [Synopsis specierum generis Centaurea L. (Asteraceae) subgeneris Xanthopsis (DC.) Tzvelev]. — Novosti Sist. Vysš. Rast. 25: 160–171. Google Scholar

16.

E. Gabrieljan 1994: Novye taksony podroda Psephellus roda Centaurea (Asteraceae) iz Armenii i Irana [New taxa of the subgenus Psephellus of the genus Centaurea from Armenia and Iran]. — Bot. Žurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 79(4): 120–129. Google Scholar

17.

E. Gabrieljan 1995: Psephellus Cass. — Pp. 336–352 in: A. Tahtadžjan (ed.), Flora Armenii 9. — Havlickuv Brod. Google Scholar

18.

E. Gabrieljan & A. L. Tahtadžjan 1992: Novyj vid Centaurea cronquistii (Asteraceae) iz Armenii. [A new species of [sic] Centaurea cronquistii (Asteraceae) from Armenia.]. — Bot. Žurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 77(9): 65–67. Google Scholar

19.

A. Galuško & A. Alieva 1976: Novyj vid roda Psephellus Cass. (Asteraceae) e severnogo Kavkaza. [Nova species generis Psephellus Cass. (Asteraceae) e Caucasi boreali]. — Novosti Sist. Vysš. Rast. 13: 246–248. Google Scholar

20.

N. Garcia-Jacas , A. Susanna & V. Mozaffarian 1998: New chromosome counts in the subtribe Centaureinae (Asteraceae, Cardueae) from West Asia III. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 128: 413–422. Google Scholar

21.

A. A. Grossgejm 1937: Materialy k poznannju dekorativnyh “suhocvetov” Zakavkaz'ja. Rod Amblyopogon (F. et. Mey.) J. & Sp. [A contribution to the knowledge of the ornamental xerophytes of Transcaucasia. The genus Amblyopogon (F. & M.) J. & Sp.]. — Trudy Prikl. Bot. Ser. 1. Sist. Rast. Obščie Vopr. Rasteniev. 2: 241–248. Google Scholar

22.

M. Guinochet & J. Foissac 1962: Sur les caryotypes de quelques espèces du genre Centaurea L. — Rev. Cytol. Biol. Véget. 25: 373–389. Google Scholar

23.

F. H. Hellwig. 1996: Untersuchungen zur Phylogenie der Cardueae-Centaureinae (Compositae) unter Verwendung molekularer und morphologisch-anatomischer Merkmale. — Habilitationsschrift Univ. Göttingen. — Göttingen. Google Scholar

24.

O. Hoffmann 1894: Compositae. — Pp. 87–387 in: A. Engler & K. Prantl , Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 4(5). — Leipzig. Google Scholar

25.

V. V. Janka 1882: Odontolophus, eine ausgezeichnete Gattung. — Österr. Bot. Z. 32: 280–281. Google Scholar

26.

M. V. Klokov 1963: Centaurea podrod 6. Heterolophus (Cass.) Dobrocz. — Pp. 463–472 in: E. G. Bobrov & S. K. Čerepanov (ed.), Flora SSSR 28. — Moskva & Leningrad. Google Scholar

27.

R. J. Moore (ed.) 1973: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1967–1971. — Regnum Veg. 90. Google Scholar

28.

D. P. Petit 1997: Generic relationships of the Cardueae (Compositae): a cladistic analysis of morphological data. — Pl. Syst. Evol. 207: 173–203. Google Scholar

29.

W. Poddubnaja-Arnoldi 1931: Vergleichende embryologisch-zytologische Untersuchungen über die Gruppe Cynareae, Fam. Compositae. — Beih. Bot. Centralbl., Abt. II, 48: 141–237. Google Scholar

30.

S. V. Pulkina 1988: Čisla hromosom nekotoryh vidov semejstva Asteraceae. [Chromosome V numbers in some species of the Asteraceae]. — Bot. Zurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 73: 607–608. Google Scholar

31.

T. S. Rostovzeva 1979: Čisla hromosom nekotoryh vidov sem. Asteraceae Dumort. [Chromosome numbers of some species of the family Asteraceae Dumort.]. — Bot. Zurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 64: 582–589. Google Scholar

32.

D. Sosnovsky 1931: O dvuh sekzijah roda Centaurea L. s. str. [On two sections of the genus Centaurea L. s. str.]. — Věstn. Tiflissk. Bot. Sada [= Monit. Jard. Bot. Tiflis N. S.], ser. 2, 5: 21–34. Google Scholar

33.

D. Sosnovsky 1948: Obzor predstavitelej roda Psephellus (Cass.) D. Sosn. [Specierum caucasicarum generis Psephelli (Cass.) D. Sosn. emend, revisio]. — Zametki Sist. Geogr. Rast. 14: 5–22. Google Scholar

34.

D. Sosnovsky 1953: Predvaritel'nye rezul'taty revizii Aetheopappus Cass. [Prodromus generis Aetheopappi Cass.] — Zametki Sist. Geogr. Rast. 17: 4–16. Google Scholar

35.

D. Sosnovsky 1963: Centaurea podrod 4. Psephellus (Cass.) Schmalh. — Pp. 420–440 in: E. G. Bobrov & S. K. Čerepanov (ed.), Flora SSSR 28. — Moskva & Leningrad. Google Scholar

36.

A. Susanna , N. Garcia Jacas , D. E. Soltis & P. S. Soltis 1995: Phylogenetic relationships in tribe Cardueae (Asteraceae) based on ITS sequences. — Amer. J. Bot. 82: 1056–1068. Google Scholar

37.

A. Tahtadžjan (ed.) 1995: Flora Armenii 9. Campanulaceae, Asteraceae. — Havlickuv Brod. Google Scholar

38.

Z. R. Tonjan 1968: Cisla hromosom nekotoryh vidov roda Centaurea. [The chromosome numbers of some species of the genus Centaurea]. — Biol. Zurn. Armenii 21: 86–96. Google Scholar

39.

G. Wagenitz 1955: Pollenmorphologie und Systematik in der Gattung Centaurea L. s.l. — Flora 142: 213–279. Google Scholar

40.

G. Wagenitz 1963: Die Eingliederung der “Phaeopappus”-Arten in das System von Centaurea. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 82: 137–215. 1963. Google Scholar

41.

G. Wagenitz 1975: Centaurea L. — Pp. 465–585 in: P. H. Davis (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 5. — Edinburgh. Google Scholar

42.

G. Wagenitz 1980: Centaurea L. — Pp. 313–420 in: K. H. Rechinger (ed.), Flora iranica 139b. — Graz. Google Scholar

43.

G. Wagenitz & F. H. Hellwig 1996: Evolution of characters and phylogeny of the Centaureinae. — Pp. 491–510 in: D. J. N. Hind & H. J. Beentje (ed.): Compositae: Systematics. Proc. Int. Compositae Conf., Kew, 1994, 1. — Kew. Google Scholar
Gerhard Wagenitz and Frank H. Hellwig "The genus Psephellus Cass. (Compositae, Cardueae) revisited with a broadened concept," Willdenowia 30(1), 29-44, (7 August 2000). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.30.30102
Published: 7 August 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
16 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top