Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
25 August 2004 On the taxonomic status and the phylogenetic relationships of some unispecific Mediterranean genera of Compositae-Anthemideae I. Brocchia, Endopappus and Heliocauta
Christoph Oberprieler
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Oberprieler, C.: On the taxonomic status and the phylogenetic relationships of some unispecific Mediterranean genera of Compositae-Anthemideae I. Brocchia, Endopappus and Heliocauta. — Willdenowia 34: 39–57. — ISSN 0511-9618; © 2004 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem.

Sequences of the nrDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the cpDNA trnL/trnF intergenic spacer (IGS) region were analysed for 67 representative species of 54 genera of Compositae-Anthemideae to ascertain the systematic position of the three unispecific Mediterranean genera Brocchia, Endopappus and Heliocauta. For Brocchia cinerea, which was considered to be closely related to Cotula due to its 4-lobed corolla of disc florets, a position among Mediterranean genera clearly distinct from Cotula but with unresolved sister group relationships is demonstrated. For Endopappus macrocarpus a close relationship with Tripleurospermum was suggested due to similarities in achene morphology; the molecular data, however, support its position distinctly distant from Tripleurospermum and among genera with a western Mediterranean centre of distribution characterized by a 5bp deletion in the trnL/trnF IGS. For Heliocauta atlantica, which was hitherto placed in the vicinity of Hippolytia from central Asia, the molecular data reveal its sister group relationship with the strictly Mediterranean genus Anacyclus. First efforts are made to date the diversification of members of the tribe based on sequence divergence rates (c. 1 % = 0.75 Myr) and assuming an origin of the tribe in the Middle Oligocene (c. 25 Myr). It is concluded that lineages within the clade of Mediterranean and Eurasian representatives characterized by a 17bp deletion in ITS2 diverged in the Middle Miocene (c. 15 Myr).

See the PDF.

References

1.

R. J. Bayer , C. F. Puttock & S. A. Kelchner 2000: Phylogeny of South African Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) based on two noncoding chloroplast sequences. —  Amer. J. Bot. 87: 259–272. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2.

B. A. Bohm & T. F. Stuessy 2001: Flavonoids of the sunflower family (Asteraceae). — Wien & New York. Google Scholar

3.

K. Bremer 1988: The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. — Evol. 42: 795–803. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4.

K. Bremer & C. J. Humphries 1993: Generic monograph of the Asteraceae-Anthemideae. — Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot. 23: 71–177. Google Scholar

5.

K. Bremer , H. Eklund , G. Medhanie , S. Heidmersson , N. Laurent , J. Maad , J. Niklasson & A. Nordin 1996: On the delimitation of Matricaria versus Microcephala (Asteraceae: Anthemideae). —  Pl. Syst. Evol. 200: 263–271. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6.

J. Briquet 1916: Études carpologiques sur les genres de composées Anthemis, Ormenis et Santolina. — Annuaire Conserv. Jard. Bot. Genève 18–19: 257–313. Google Scholar

7.

J. J. Bruhl & C. J. Quinn 1990: Cypsela anatomy in the ‘Cotuleae’ (Asteraceae-Anthemideae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 102: 37–59. Google Scholar

8.

A. R. Delile 1813: Description de l'Egypte […] Histoire naturelle 2. — Paris. Google Scholar

9.

M. L. DeVore & T. F. Stuessy 1995: The place and time of origin of the Asteraceae, with additional comments on the Calyceraceae and Goodeniaceae. — Pp. 23–40 in: D. J. N. Hind , G. V. Pope & C. Jeffrey (ed.). Advances in Compositae Systematics. — Kew. Google Scholar

10.

T. Eriksson & N. Wikström 1995: AutoDecay version 3.0. — Stockholm. Google Scholar

11.

J. Felsenstein 1981: Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. —  J. Mol. Evol. 17: 368–376. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12.

J. Felsenstein 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evol. 39: 783–791. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13.

J. Francisco-Ortega , A. Santos-Guerra , A. Hines & R. K. Jansen 1997: Molecular evidence for a Mediterranean origin of the Macaronesian endemic genus Argyranthemum (Asteraceae). —  Amer. J. Bot. 84: 1595–1613. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14.

J. Francisco-Ortega , J. C. Barber , A. Santos-Guerra , R. Febles-Hernández & R. K. Jansen 2001: Origin and evolution of the endemic genera of Gonosperminae (Asteraceae: Anthemideae) from the Canary Islands: Evidence from nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. —  Amer. J. Bot. 88: 161–169. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15.

M. Giroux 1930: Sur la carpologie de quelques Composées nord-africaines. — Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 21: 161–188. Google Scholar

16.

A. Graham 1996: A contribution to the geologic history of the Compositae. — Pp. 123–140 in: D. J. N. Hind & H. J. Beentje (ed.), Compositae systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew (1994) 1. — Kew. Google Scholar

17.

H. Greger 1977: Anthemideae — chemical review. — Pp. 899–941 in: V. H. Heywood , J. B. Harborne & B. L. Turner (ed.), The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. — London, etc.  Google Scholar

18.

W. Greuter , H. M. Burdet & G. Long 1984–89: Med-Checklist. — Geneva & Berlin. Google Scholar

19.

H. Greger , C. Oberprieler & R. Vogt 2003: The Euro+Med treatment of Anthemideae (Compositae) — generic concepts and required new names. —  Willdenowia 33: 37–43. Google Scholar

20.

G. Harling 1950: Embryological studies in the Compositae. I. Anthemideae-Anthemidinae. — Acta Horti Berg. 15: 135–168. Google Scholar

21.

H. Greger 1951: Embryological studies in the Compositae. II. Anthemideae-Chrysantheminae. — Acta Horti Berg. 16: 1–56. Google Scholar

22.

H. Greger 1960: Further embryological and taxonomical studies in Anthemis L. and some related genera. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 54: 572–590 Google Scholar

23.

F. H. Hellwig , M. Nolte , J. Ochsmann & V. Wissemann 1999: Rapid isolation of total cell DNA from milligram plant tissue. — Haussknechtia 7: 29–34. Google Scholar

24.

K. J. Hsü 1972: When the Mediterranean dried up. — Sci. Amer. 227: 27–36. Google Scholar

25.

J. P. Huelsenbeck & F. Ronquist 2001a: MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. —  BioInformatics 17: 754–755. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26.

J. P. Huelsenbeck & F. Ronquist 2001b: MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Computer software available at  http://brahms.biology.rochester.edu/software.html  Google Scholar

27.

C. J. Humphries 1977: A new genus of the Compositae from North Africa. — Bot. Not. 130: 155–161. Google Scholar

28.

N. S. Khandjian 1992: The taxonomic significance of the achene's structure in the subtribe Anthemideae (Asteraceae). — Bot. Žurn. 77: 89–98. Google Scholar

29.

H. Kishino & M. Hasegawa 1989: Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topology from DNA sequence data, and the branching order of Hominoideae. —  J. Mol. Evol. 29: 170–179. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30.

M. Kynčlová 1970: Comparative morphology of achenes of the tribe Anthemideae Cass. (Family Asteraceae) and its taxonomic significance. — Preslia 42: 33–53. Google Scholar

31.

P. O. Lewis 2001: Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. —  Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 30–37. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32.

R. Litardière & R. Maire 1924: Contributions à l'étude de la flore du Grand Atlas. — Mém. Soc. Sci. Nat. Maroc 4: 1–32. Google Scholar

33.

K. Mummenhoff , P. Linder , N. Friesen , J. L. Bowman , J.-Y. Lee & A. Franzke 2004: Molecular evidence for bicontinental hybridogenous genomic constitution in Lepidium sensu stricto (Brassicaceae) species from Australia and New Zealand. —  Amer. J. Bot. 91: 254–261. Google Scholar

34.

C. Oberprieler 2001: Phylogenetic relationships in Anthemis L. (Compositae, Anthemideae) based on nrDNA ITS sequence variation. — Taxon 50: 745–762. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35.

C. Oberprieler 2002: A phylogenetic analysis of Chamaemelum Miller (Compositae, Anthemideae) and related genera based upon nrDNA ITS and cpDNA trnL/trnF IGS sequence variation. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 138: 255–273. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36.

C. Oberprieler (in prep.): On the taxonomic status and the phylogenetic relationships of some unispecific Mediterranean genera of Compositae-Anthemideae. II. Daveaua, Leucocyclus and Nananthea.  Google Scholar

37.

C. Oberprieler & R. Vogt 1993: Chromosome numbers of North African phanerogams II. — Willdenowia 23: 211–238. Google Scholar

38.

C. Oberprieler & R. Vogt 2000: The position of Castrilanthemum Vogt & Oberprieler and the phylogeny of Mediterranean Anthemideae (Compositae) as inferred from nrDNA ITS and cpDNA trnL/trnF IGS sequence variation. —  Pl. Syst. Evol. 225: 145–170. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39.

C. Oberprieler , R. Vogt & L. E. Watson (in press): Tribe Anthemideae Cass. — In: J. W. Kadereit (ed.), Families and genera of vascular plants. Asteridae. — Berlin, etc. Google Scholar

40.

D. Posada & K. A. Crandall 1998: Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. — Bioinformatics Application Note 14: 817–818. Google Scholar

41.

G. Reese 1957: Über die Polyploidiespektren in der nordsaharischen Wüstenflora. — Flora 144: 598–634. Google Scholar

42.

F. Reitbrecht 1974: Fruchtanatomie und Systematik der Anthemideae (Asteraceae). — Thesis, Wien. Google Scholar

43.

T. Sang , D. J. Crawford , T. F. Stuessy & M. Silva 1995: ITS sequences and the phylogeny of the genus Robinsonia (Asteraceae). —  Syst. Bot. 20: 55–64. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44.

C. H. Schultz 1860: Ueber die Catanancheen. — Bonplandia 8: 367–371. Google Scholar

45.

D. L. Swofford 2002: PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0.betal0. — Sunderland, MA. Google Scholar

46.

P. Taberlet , L. Gielly , G. Pautou & J. Bouvet 1991: Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. —  Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105–1109. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47.

K. Tamura & M. Nei 1993: Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. —  Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 512–526. Google Scholar

48.

J. D. Thompson , D. G. Higgins and T. J. Gibson 1994: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. —  Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49.

T. G. Tutin , V. H. Heywood , N. A. Burges , D. H. Valentine , S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb. 1964–80: Flora europaea 1–5. —Cambridge. Google Scholar

50.

H. Uitz 1970: Cytologische und bestäubungsexperimentelle Beiträge zur Verwandtschaft und Evolution der Anthemideae (Asteraceae). — Thesis, Graz. Google Scholar

51.

R. de Visiani 1836: Plantae quaedam Aegypti ac Nubiae enumerate atque illustratae. — Padua. Google Scholar

52.

K. B. Von Hagen & J. W. Kadereit 2001: The phylogeny of Gentianella (Gentianaceae) and its colonization of the southern hemisphere as revealed by nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence variation. — Organisms, Diversity & Evol. 1: 61–79. Google Scholar

53.

S. J. Wagstaff & I. Breitwieser 2002: Phylogenetic relationships of New Zealand Asteraceae inferred from ITS sequences. —  Pl. Syst. Evol. 231: 203–224. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54.

L. E. Watson , T. M. Evans & T. Boluarte 2000: Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of tribe Anthemideae (Asteraceae), based on chloroplast gene ndhF. —  Mol. Phylog. Evol. 15: 59–69. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55.

J. F. Wendel , A. Schnabel & T. Seelanan 1995: An unusual ribosomal DNA sequence from Gossypium gossypioides reveals ancient, cryptic, intergenomic introgression. —  Mol. Phylog. Evol. 4: 298–313. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56.

T. J. White , T Bruns , S. Lee & J. Taylor 1990: Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. — Pp. 315–322 in: M. Innis , D. Gelfand , J. Sninsky & T. White (ed.), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and application. — San Diego. Google Scholar

57.

L.-B. Zhang , H. P. Comes & J. W. Kadereit 2001: Phylogeny and quaternary history of European montane/alpine endemic Soldanella (Primulaceae) based on ITS and AFLP variation. — Amer. J. Bot. 8: 2331–2345. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
© 2004 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem.
Christoph Oberprieler "On the taxonomic status and the phylogenetic relationships of some unispecific Mediterranean genera of Compositae-Anthemideae I. Brocchia, Endopappus and Heliocauta," Willdenowia 34(1), 39-57, (25 August 2004). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.34.34102
Published: 25 August 2004
Back to Top