Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
16 July 2015 Ranunculus pindicola sp. nov., the only species of the R. auricomus complex (Ranunculaceae) in Greece
Franz G. Dunkel
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Ranunculus auricomus s.l. (Ranunculaceae) has been found only a few times in Greece since its first finding there by Haussknecht in 1893, all records coming from the area of the Katara pass in the Pindos mountains. All populations seem to be identical, and the Greek plants are described and named here as R. pindicola sp. nov. The new species is geographically isolated; the nearest localities of other members of the R. auricomus complex are in the Rila mountains of Bulgaria and the Sila mountains of Calabria in S Italy. According to present knowledge, R. pindicola is a rare endemic species of C Greece. It is threatened by eutrophication or abandonment of its meadow sites.

Introduction

Within the genus Ranunculus L., the R. auricomus complex comprises a rather well-defined group of about 800 mostly apomictic and pseudogamous Eurasiatic species (Ericsson 2001; Hörandl & al. 2009). It is characterized by a more or less heterophyllous leaf cycle, generation of carpellophores and haired nutlets. The number of petals varies from one to five — only characteristic for each species — and they may be completely absent.

After 1932, following the discovery of the pseudogamous reproduction mode by Rozanova (1932), the taxa were treated as a single species by most of the central European specialists. In contrast, the Scandinavian authors divided the complex into hundreds of (apomictic) subspecies und grouped them into four major “collective species” (Ranunculus auricomus, R. cassubicus L., R. fallax (Wimm. & Grab.) Sloboda and R. monophyllus Ovcz.). These four “species” are polyphyletic with ill-defined limits and transitions. Although the grouping and species concept is still under debate (Ericsson 1992; Hörandl 1998), all microspecies were recently treated unanimously as species as in other agamic complexes (Hörandl & Gutermann 1998; Dunkel 2010, 2014).

The presence of Ranunculus auricomus s.l. in Greece has been known for 130 years (Greuter & al. 1989; Dimopoulos & al. 2013). Haussknecht reported a collection of “Ranunculus auricomus L. β. binatus W. K.” from subalpine spring communities at the Zygos pass during his excursion to Greece in 1885 [“in scaturiginosis jugi subalpini Zygos” (Haussknecht 1898: 98)]. Since then, only very few reports and collections have been added, all in the same area around the Katara pass of the Pindos mountains (Quézel & Contandriopoulos 1965; collections A. Strid 24571 & A. Strid 28937). The assumption that R. auricomus “probably occurs in the forest zone elsewhere in N Greece” (Strid 1986) has not been confirmed. In 2011, during a visit to Metsovo, two populations of R. auricomus were found and have been studied more intensely. Morphologically, all populations are identical and they are close but different to R. binatus Kit. ex Rchb., recently lectotypified (Dunkel 2011a). Due to their geographic isolation and morphological characters it seems justified to describe the Greek populations as a new species of the R. auricomus complex.

Table 1.

Characters of Ranunculus pindicola and morphologically similar species in S and SE Europe.

t01_223.gif

Material and methods

Material collected in Greece in 2011 was studied. Additionally, specimens from the herbaria Copenhagen (C) and Jena (J), including the collection by Haussknecht 1885 (J), were examined (herbarium codes according to Thiers 2015+). The private herbarium of F. G. Dunkel is indicated by the prefix “Du-” followed by the collecting number and herbarium number (which are the same).

Cultivated plants from collections by F. G. Dunkel were used for flow-cytometric analysis of DNA content (Dunkel, Paule & Gregor in prep.). DNA-ploidy levels were estimated by flow-cytometric analyses of fresh leaves using a Partec CyFlow space (Partec, Germany) fitted with a high-power UV LED (365 nm). Leaf tissues of the analysed sample and internal standard Pisum sativum (Doležel & al. 1992) were co-chopped using a razor blade in a plastic Petri dish containing 1 ml of ice-cold Otto I buffer [0.1 M citric acid, 0.5 % Tween 20 (Otto 1990; Doležel & al. 2007)]. The suspension was filtered through Partec CellTrics® 30 µm (Partec, Germany) to remove tissue debris and incubated for at least 10 min at room temperature. Isolated nuclei in filtered suspension were stained with 1 ml of Otto II buffer (0.4 M Na2HPO4×12H2O) containing the AT-specific fluorochrome 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 4 µg·ml-1) and β-mercaptoethanol (2 µg·ml-1). The relative fluorescence intensity was recorded for 3000 particles. Sample/standard ratios were calculated from the means of fluorescence histograms visualized using the FloMax v2.4d software (Partec, Germany). Only histograms with coefficients of variation (CVs) <5 % for the G0/G1 peak of the sample were considered.

Stained by carmine acetic, the pollen quality was determined according to Hörandl & al. (1997).

Species concept, definition of characters and depiction broadly follow Hörandl & Gutermann (1998) and Dunkel (2010).

Results

Species characteristics of the Ranunculus auricomus complex are best demonstrated and mediated by comparative illustrations, especially of the basal leaf cycle (Fig. 13). Ranunculus pindicola differs from all other similar species (R. binatus, R. pseudobinatus Soó and R. silanus Pignatti) by the almost parallel margins of the middle segment. The main incisions of the final leaves amount to 40–65 % compared to 66–90 % in R. pseudobinatus, 80–90 % in R. binatus, and 90–95 % in R. silanus.

The type population of Ranunculus pindicola, sample no. 030_RAN21B_01_Pisum300.fcs, collected at 39°47′11.9″N, 21°09′30.8″E, was investigated by flow cytometry. CVs for the G0/G1 peak of the samples were 1.35 % and 1.78 %, respectively. Two distinct classes of sample/standard ratios were identified: 0.66 (±0.04) and 1.33 (±0.05) (Dunkel, Gregor & Paule in prep.). Cultivated plants from the type localities of R. carpaticola Soó [2n = 16 (Hörandl & Greilhuber 2002); 007_RAN25_01_Pisum300.fcs, Slovakia: Banská Bystrica Region, 1 km NW Revúca, 46°41′21.1″N, 20°07′28.6″E] and R. vindobonensis Hörandl & Gutermann [2n = 32 (Hörandl & al. 1997); 008_RAN26_01_Pisum300.fcs, Austria: Lower Austria, 0.3 km N Schwarzensee, 48°00′46.1″N, 16°03′43.6″E] served for calibration. The obtained values were 0.59 and 1.26, respectively. The ratio of 1.29 for R. pindicola indicates tetraploidy.

Staining by carmine acetic revealed 53 % normal pollen morphology.

Ranunculus pindicola Dunkel, sp. nov.Fig. 13.

  • Holotypus: Greece, Ioannina, Metsovo, Zighos, 9–10 km vom Katara-Pass gegen Ioannina, W der Straße bei der Kapelle Profitis Ilias, 39°47′11.9″N, 21°09′30.8″E, 1335 m, Hochebene, Feuchtwiese mit Narcissus radiiflorus, 2 Jun 2011, leg. & det. F. G. Dunkel (B; isotypi: C, M, STR, Du-26710 [8 sheets], Du-26720 [7 sheets] [Du-26710 and Du-26720 belong to the same gathering despite the different collecting/herbarium numbers]).

  • DescriptionFlowering shoot (17-)22-45 cm tall, slender; stalk 1-2(2.9) mm in diam., suberect or moderately divergent (15–45°), with 1–5 flowers; enrichment shoots 0–2; cataphylls absent; basal leaves 1–4 per rosette, all apertures of basal leaves with wide-angled base ((100-)120-170°), occasionally fourth basal leaf truncate (170–190°) (Fig. 2). First basal leaf 11–14 mm long, cleft by main incision (55–60 %); middle lobe rectangular to deltoid, with 3 teeth; lateral lobes undivided or lobed (25–32 %); leaf margin irregularly crenate-serrate to serrate. Second basal leaf 16–22 mm long, cleft to divided by the main incision (55–75 %); middle lobe rectangular to deltoid, mostly with 3 teeth; lateral lobes lobed or cleft by the first lateral incision (25–45 %); leaf margin irregularly serrate. Third basal leaf 18–24 mm long, divided by main incision (66–93 %); middle lobe rectangular to deltoid, with 3–7 teeth; lateral lobes cleft by first lateral incision (35–65 %); leaf margin deeply and irregularly serrate. Fourth basal leaf 28–40 mm long, foot-like divided or dissected by main incision (95–100 %); middle lobe lanceolate to cuneate, petiolate to 2 mm, undivided or with 2–5 teeth; lateral lobes petiolate to 10 mm, cleft or divided by first lateral incision (45–75 %, with angle up to 60°), lobed to cleft by second lateral incision (25–50 %); leaf margin deeply and irregularly crenate-serrate. Fifth basal leaf 24–30 mm long, divided by main incision (75–90 %), middle lobe rectangular to deltoid with 5–7 teeth; lateral lobes cleft by first lateral incision (40–60 %), rarely divided to 75 %; second lateral incision absent or to 37 %; leaf margin deeply and irregularly (crenate-serrate or) serrate. Sixth basal leaf 24–32 mm long, cleft to divided by wide main incision (50–75 %); middle lobe rectangular to narrowly deltoid with 3–7 teeth; lateral lobes lobed or cleft by first lateral incision (25–45 %), second lateral incision absent or rarely to 35 %; leaf margin deeply and irregularly crenate-serrate or serrate. Seventh basal leaf 20–33 mm long, cleft by main incision (40–65 %); middle lobe rectangular or deltoid with 3–7 crenate teeth; lateral lobes undivided; leaf margin deeply and coarsely crenateserrate or serrate. Lowest stem leaf divided into 7–9 segments, largest segment 24–55 mm long, 2.5–4 mm wide, narrowly lanceolate, undivided (Fig. 3). Flowers: petals 0–2(or 3), 6–9 mm long, 5–7 mm wide; androclinium 0.3–0.4 mm long; gynoclinium (ellipsoid to) cylindric, 2.5–5.2 mm long, 1.5–2 mm wide, glabrous, intervallum absent, carpellophores medium-sized, 0.05–0.2 mm long. Fruits 2–2.7 mm long; beak 0.4–0.6 mm long, uncinate.

  • Chromosome number — 2n = 32 (derived from C value of Ranunculus pindicola compared to R. vindobonensis; Dunkel, Paule & Gregor in prep.).

  • Pollen viability — Low; 53% well developed.

  • Distribution — Greece, a local endemic of the Pindos mountains around the Katara pass (Fig. 4).

  • Ecology — All populations grow in light-exposed meadow communities, one in a damp fallow meadow along a small brook, partly enriched by Juncus effusus L., the other in winter-wet or winter-flooded meadows dominated by Alopecurus rendlei Eig with concomitant Narcissus radiiflorus Salisb. (Alopecurion utriculati Zeidler 1954). An exact analysis of the inhabited communities is still lacking. Ranunculus pindicola occurs fom 1180 m to 1700 m above sea level.

  • Conservation status — Endangered (EN Blab(iii,v)+2ab (iii,v); D), according to IUCN (2012) criteria, due to a small and fragmented extent of occurrence and area of occupancy, with fewer than five subpopulations and an overall population of fewer than 250 mature individuals. The habitat of Ranunculus pindicola is severely endangered by risk of eutrophication or abandonment of damp meadows.

  • Etymology — The specific epithet means dweller in the Pindos mountains.

  • Additional specimens seen (paratypi) — Greece, Epirus (Ioannina regional unit), Pindos mountains, Metsovo, Pindus Tymphaeus: in summo montis Zygos (Lakmon veter.) supra Metzovo, substrato silicico-serpentino, 1370–1523 m, Jul 1885, C. Haussknecht s.n. (J), rev. O. Schwarz 1950 sub Ranunculus binatus, rev. F. G. Dunkel 2012 sub R. pindicola [with fruits, no basal leaves; 2 specimens]; ibid., Metsovo, Katara pass, 9–10 km from summit along road to Ioannina, meadows in opening of Fagus forest, gregarious in damp meadow, 1350 m, 18 May 1985, A. Strid 24571 (C-8/2009-2), det. A. Strid sub R. auricomus, rev. F. G. Dunkel 2012 sub R. pindicola; ibid., Metsovo, 3 km from the village of Milea along road to Katara pass, meadows in opening of Fagus forest, gregarious in damp meadow, 1400 m, 39°50′N, 21°15′E, 7 May 1989, A. Strid & al. 28937 (C-68/2009-1), det. A. Strid sub R. auricomus, rev. F. G. Dunkel 2012 sub R. pindicola; ibid., Metsovo, Milia, 1.5 km SW Milia, Talsenke, Talverebnung, Wiesengraben, Binsensumpf, 39°50′44″N, 21°12′56″E, 1180 m, 2 Jun 2011, F. G. Dunkel (Du-26708), det. F. G. Dunkel.

  • Reported localities in the literature — Greece, Pinde, bord des eaux: pozzines de Metzovon, vers 1700 m (Quézel & Contandriopoulos 1965); in scaturiginosis jugi subalpini Zygos P. T. [Pindus Tymphanos = Katara pass] (Haussknecht 1898).

  • Fig. 1.

    Ranunculus pindicola — A: holotype; B: flower (from Du-26720-7); C: fruit (from Du-26720-7); D: receptacle (from holotype). — Scale bars: A: 5 cm; B, C, D: 2 mm.

    f01_223.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    Ranunculus pindicola basal leaf cycle; rows 1–7 represent first to seventh basal leaves; letters a–l represent different individual plants from specimens as follows: a, g: Du-26710-3; b: Du-26720-9; c: Du-26720-12; d: Du-26720-10; e: Du-26720-11; f: Du-26710-2; h & i: Du-26708-2; j: Du-26708-9; k: Du-26708-12; l: Du-26708-4.

    f02_223.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Stem leaves of Ranunculus pindicola — A, D: holotype; B: isotype (Du-26720-6); C: isotype (Du-26710-7).

    f03_223.jpg

    Fig. 4.

    Distribution of the Ranunculus auricomus complex in SE Europe: fi05_223.gif = Ranunculus pindicola; fi01_223.gif = R. marsicus; fi06_223.gif = R. degenii; fi02_223.gif = R. silanus; fi03_223.gif = R. pseudobinatus.

    f04_223.jpg

    Discussion

    In contrast to other apomictic groups, e.g. Alchemilla and Rubus, many microspecies of the Ranunculus auricomus complex possess a small distribution area (Julin 1980; Jalas & Suominen 1989; Kurtto & al. 2007, 2010). At the S edge of the distribution area, the populations are geographically isolated (Grau 1984; Jalas & Suominen 1989; Dunkel 2011). The geographically closest populations of R. auricomus s.l. to R. pindicola represent undescribed lineages of the Rila mountains of S Bulgaria and R. silanus Pignatti from the Sila mountains of Calabria, S Italy, within a distance of c. 300 km and c. 400 km, respectively (Fig. 4; Dimitrov 2002; Dunkel 2011b).

    Morphologically, Ranunculus pindicola differs from R. silanus, among others, by the parallel margins of the middle segments of the basal leaves, a smaller incision of the final leaves, and almost always entire stem leaves. The morphology and distribution area of R. binatus and R. pseudobinatus are poorly known. Since the publication by Soó (1964, 1965), there has been no progress in the knowledge of these taxa. The lectotype of R. binatus stems from the N parts of Slovakia (ancient region of Liptov) (Dunkel 2011a), the holotype of R. pseudobinatus (BP-62950) was collected in Transylvania, part of modern Romania. For Bulgaria, the taxa listed in Jordanov (1970) could not be attributed to some of the above-mentioned agamospecies; a modern investigation dealing with the R. auricomus complex and its distribution in Bulgaria is lacking.

    Ranunculus binatus is characterized by a pilose receptacle, and R. pseudobinatus differs by its (mostly) petiolate middle segment of the fourth basal leaf and undivided lateral segments of the final basal leaves (for details, see Table 1).

    Similar to the likely twin pair Ranunculus degenii Kümmerle & Jáv. from Macedonia and nearby Albania and S Serbia and R. marsicus Guss. & Ten. from the C Apennines, Italy, also R. pindicola and R. silanus may represent amphi-Adriatic relatives, originating during the Pleistocene with reduced sea level and a land bridge or at least islands between Italy and Greece. To prove this hypothesis, molecular research is strictly needed.

    Although there may be similar morphotypes of Ranunculus pindicola in C Europe, including R. variabilis Hörandl & Gutermann, due to the geographic situation it is unlikely that these taxa are conspecific.

    Over 95 % of all taxa of the Ranunculus auricomus complex s.str. screened for ploidy level are tetraploid (Rousi 1956; Lohwasser 2001; Dunkel & al. in prep.). Therefore, our results derived by flow-cytometric analysis and indicating tetraploidy for R. pindicola are not surprising. Together with poor pollen development (53%) and only 0–2 petals per flower, R. pindicola should represent a newly described apomictic lineage with a small relict distribution area in damp meadows in the surroundings of the Katara pass (Strid 2002 sub R. auricomus). Even as an agamospecies, due to its rareness at the edge of the distribution area, R. pindicola deserves more attention, and it needs protection due to its occurrence in endangered habitats.

    Acknowledgements

    I would like to sincerely thank H.-J. Zündorf, curator of the Herbarium Haussknecht, Jena (J), and an unknown staff member of the Herbarium Copenhagen (C), for the opportunity of a loan. T. Gregor and J. Paule, both Frankfurt, kindly undertook the flow-cytometric measurement of cultivated material. I highly appreciate the assistance of J. Sandersson for improving the English text. I am also grateful for the helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers on an earlier version of the manuscript.

    References

    1.

    D. Dimitrov 2002: Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora: distribution maps and floristic elements. — Sofia: Swiss Biodiversity Conservation Programme. Google Scholar

    2.

    P. Dimopoulos , Th. Raus , E. Bergmeier , Th. Constantinidis , G. Iatrou , S. Kokkini , A. Strid & D. Tzanoudakis 2013: Vascular plants of Greece: an annotated checklist. — Berlin: Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem; Athens: Hellenic Botanical Society. — Englera 31. Google Scholar

    3.

    J. Doležel , J. Greilhuber & J. Suda 2007: Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. —  Nat. Protoc. 2: 2233–2244. Google Scholar

    4.

    J. Doležel , S. Sgorbati & S. Lucretti 1992: Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. —  Physiol. Pl. (Copenhagen) 85: 625–631. Google Scholar

    5.

    F. G. Dunkel 2010: The Ranunculus auricomus complex L. (Ranunculaceae) in northern Italy. —  Webbia 65: 179–227. Google Scholar

    6.

    F. G. Dunkel 2011a: Typification of Ranunculus binatus Kit. ex Rchb. (Ranunculaceae). —  Willdenowia 41: 239–243. Google Scholar

    7.

    F. G. Dunkel 2011b: The Ranunculus auricomus L. complex (Ranunculaceae) in central and southern Italy with additions for the north. —  Webbia 66: 165–193. Google Scholar

    8.

    F. G. Dunkel 2014: Le complexe de Ranunculus auricomus (Ranunculaceae) en Alsace. — J. Bot. Soc. Bot. France 66: 3–64. Google Scholar

    9.

    S. Ericsson 1992: The microspecies of the Ranunculus auricomus complex treated at the species level. — Ann. Bot. Fenn. 29: 123–158. Google Scholar

    10.

    S. Ericsson 2001: Microspecies within the Ranunculus auricomus complex. — Pp. 382–397 in: B. Jonsell (ed.), Flora nordica 2. Chenopodiaceae to Fumariaceae — Stockholm: Bergius Foundation, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Google Scholar

    11.

    J. Grau 1984: Preliminary review of the Iberian representatives of Ranunculus sect. Auricomus. — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 20: 1–28. Google Scholar

    12.

    W. Greuter , H. M. Burdet & G. Long 1989: Med-Checklist. A critical inventory of vascular plants of the circum-mediterranean countries. 4. Dicotyledones (Lauraceae-Rhamnaceae). — Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève; Berlin: Secrétariat Med-Checklist, Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Google Scholar

    13.

    C. Haussknecht 1898: Symbolae ad floram graecam. Aufzählung der im Sommer 1885 in Griechenland gesammelten Pflanzen. — Mitth. Thüring. Bot. Vereins, n.F., 3/4: 96–116. Google Scholar

    14.

    E. Hörandl 1998: Species concepts in agamic complexes: applications in the Ranunculus auricomus complex and general perspectives. —  Folia Geobot. 33: 335–348. Google Scholar

    15.

    E. Hörandl , A.-C. Cosendai & E. M. Temsch 2008: Understanding the geographic distributions of apomictic plants: a case for a pluralistic approach. —  Pl. Ecol. Divers. 1: 309–320. Google Scholar

    16.

    E. Hörandl , C. Dobeš & M. Lambrou 1997: Chromosomen- und Pollenuntersuchungen an österreichischen Arten des apomiktischen Ranunculus auricomus-Komplexes. — Bot. Helv. 107: 195–209. Google Scholar

    17.

    E. Hörandl & J. Greilhuber 2002: Diploid and autotetraploid sexuals and their relationships to apomicts in the Ranunculus cassubicus group: insights from DNA content and isozyme variation. —  Pl. Syst. Evol. 234: 85–100. Google Scholar

    18.

    E. Hörandl , J. Greilhuber , K. Klímova , O. Paun , E. M. Temsch , K. Emadzade & I. Hodálova 2009: Reticulate evolution and taxonomic concepts in the Ranunculus auricomus complex (Ranunculaceae): insights from analysis of morphological, karyological und molecular data. — Taxon 58: 1194–1215. Google Scholar

    19.

    E. Hörandl & W. Gutermann 1998: Der Ranunculus auricomus-Komplex in Österreich. 1. Methodik; Gruppierung der mitteleuropäischen Sippen. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 120: 1–44. Google Scholar

    20.

    IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) 2012: IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 3.1, ed. 2. — Gland & Cambridge: IUCN. — Published at  http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/redlist_cats_crit_en.pdf  Google Scholar

    21.

    J. Jalas & J. Suominen (ed.) 1989: Atlas florae europaeae. Distribution of vascular plants in Europe. 8. Nymphaeaceae to Ranunculaceae. — Helsinki: The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo. Google Scholar

    22.

    D. Jordanov (ed.) 1970: Flora Reipublicae popularis bulgaricae 4. — Sofia: Academy of Science. Google Scholar

    23.

    E. Julin 1980: Ranunculus auricomus L. in Södermanland, East-Central Sweden. — Opera Bot. 57: 1–145. Google Scholar

    24.

    A. Kurtto , S. E. Frohner & R. Lampinen (ed.) 2007: Atlas florae europaeae. Distribution of vascular plants in Europe. 14. Rosaceae (Alchemilla and Aphanes). — Helsinki: The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo. Google Scholar

    25.

    A. Kurtto , H. E. Weber , R. Lampinen & A. N. Sennikov (ed.) 2010: Atlas florae europaeae. Distribution of vascular plants in Europe. 15. Rosaceae (Rubus). — Helsinki: The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo. Google Scholar

    26.

    U. Lohwasser 2001: Biosystematische Untersuchungen an Ranunculus auricomus L. (Ranunculaceae) in Deutschland. — Diss. Bot. 343: 1–220. Google Scholar

    27.

    F. Otto 1990: DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. —  Meth. Cell Biol. 33: 105–110. Google Scholar

    28.

    P. Quézel & N. Contandriopoulos 1965: Contribution à l'étude de la flore du Pinde central et septentrional et de l'Olympe de Thessalie. — Candollea 20: 51–90, pl. 57. Google Scholar

    29.

    A. Rousi 1956: Cytotaxonomy and reproduction in the apomictic Ranunculus auricomus group. — Ann. Bot. Soc. Zool.-Bot. Fenn. “Vanamo” 29: 1–64. Google Scholar

    30.

    M. A. Rozanowa 1932: fi04_223.gif conspecies Ranunculus auricomus Korsh. [Essay of an analytical monography of conspecies Ranunculus auricomus Korsh.]. — Trudy Petergofsk. Estestv.-Nauchn. Inst. 8: 1–148. Google Scholar

    31.

    R. Soó 1964: Die Ranunculus auricomus L. emend. Korsh. Artengruppe in der Flora Ungarns und der Karpaten I. — Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 10: 221–237. Google Scholar

    32.

    R. Soó 1965: Die Ranunculus auricomus L. emend. Korsh. Artengruppe in der Flora Ungarns und der Karpaten II. — Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 11: 395–404. Google Scholar

    33.

    A. Strid 1986: Ranunculus L. — Pp. 210–225 in: A. Strid (ed.), Mountain flora of Greece 1. — Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar

    34.

    A. Strid 2002: Ranunculus L. — Pp. 38–69, maps 785–840 in: A. Strid & K. Tan (ed.), Flora hellenica 2. — Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner. Google Scholar

    35.

    B. Thiers 2015+ [continuously updated]: Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. — New York Botanical Garden: published at  http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ [accessed 3 Jul 2015]. Google Scholar
    © 2015 BGBM Berlin.
    Franz G. Dunkel "Ranunculus pindicola sp. nov., the only species of the R. auricomus complex (Ranunculaceae) in Greece," Willdenowia 45(2), 223-230, (16 July 2015). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.45.45208
    Published: 16 July 2015
    KEYWORDS
    apomictic
    new species
    Pindos mountains
    pseudogamous
    Back to Top