Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2003 Population Genetic Structure of the Spotted Seal Phoca largha along the Coast of Hokkaido, Based on Mitochondrial DNA Sequences
Ayako W. Mizuno, Manabu Onuma, Manami Takahashi, Noriyuki Ohtaishi
Author Affiliations +

Population genetic structure of the spotted seal, Phoca largha, along coastal regions of Hokkaido was investigated, using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences. A 571-bp fragment of the mtDNA control region and adjacent threonine and proline transfer RNA genes was sequenced from 66 seals. We categorized all individuals into three groups considering sampling area and season: twenty-four seals from the Sea of Okhotsk in winter, 11 seals from the Sea of Okhotsk coast in fall, and 31 seals from the Sea of Japan coast in winter. From the 66 animals, 57 haplotypes were identified. Compared with the harbor seal sequence, all spotted seals examined shared two deletions in the control region, which distinguished between the two species. Forty-nine haplotypes were represented by a single individual, and haplotypes shared by more than two animals were generally restricted to same sampling-groups. Phylogenetic trees did not indicate clear geographic differences among the three groups. An Analysis of molecular variances (AMOVA) did not showed any significant population genetic structure in Hokkaido spotted seals (Φst = −0.003). Our results showed a high level of diversity but no genetic structure, and did not deny the possibility that seals in the Okhotsk breeding concentration mainly stayed in the fall Okhotsk and also inhabited in the winter Sea of Japan.


The spotted seal, Phoca largha, is widely distributed in the north and west of the North Pacific Ocean: the Huanghai (Yellow Sea), Japan, Okhotsk, Bering, Chukchi, and Beau-fort Seas, and there are geographic eight breeding concentrations (Shaughnessy and Fay, 1977). Morphological differences were reported among breeding concentrations (Kosygin and Gol'tsev, 1974; Fedoseev et al., 1979; Fedoseev, 1984), some of which resulted them as different populations. However, it might be possible that spotted seals move around other breeding concentrations and genetic exchanges occur, because they have a high mobile ability for great distance, which was studied using satellite-linked tags (Lowry et al., 1998), although the genetic relationship has not yet been confirmed.

In the coastal waters of Hokkaido (Japan) and Peter the Great Bay (Russia), spotted seals are reported to have a high level of human-caused mortality such as entanglement in the fishing net, oil spill accident, and damage control kill event (Mizuno et al., 2001; Trukhin and Mizuno, 2002). However, it is difficult to assess the influence on seal population continuation, since there is little understanding about the population unit and range, which is important basis in wildlife management and conservation planning. One of the reasons will be lack of genetic information in this species.

Although there have not yet been studied enough in spotted seals, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequences have been used as a genetic marker to identify population structure in a number of marine mammals (Dizon et al., 1997). Also it was reported in the harbor seal Phoca vitulina (Lamont et al., 1996; Stanley et al., 1996; Burg et al., 1999; Watanabe Y., unpublished data), which is a genetically close-related species to the spotted seal (Árnason et al., 1995; O'Corry-Crowe and Westlake, 1997). The only study dealing with those in the spotted seal resulted to be likewise not genetically discernable between Alaska and Kamchatka seal (O'Corry-Crowe and Westlake, 1997). However, the whole sequence data was not shown there, and few specimens between 3 and 9 seals in each site were analyzed without enough descriptions of sampling season and method.

In this study, we describe the genetic features of spotted seals off Hokkaido waters, using the sequence of mtDNA control region, and discuss population structure and range, taking future seal conservation and management into account. In Hokkaido waters, spotted seals appear mostly in fall for following salmon, and in winter (around sea ice season) for the reproduction (Naito and Nishiwaki, 1975; Naito and Konno, 1979; Uno and Yamanaka, 1988; Mizuno et al., 2001, 2002; Mizuno and Ohtaishi, 2002). We categorize these seals into several groups based on the appearance season and area, compare the genetic relationship among groups, and discuss their natal breeding concentration.


Sample collection and DNA extraction: Tissue samples of muscle and skin were collected from 66 deceased spotted seals along the coast of Hokkaido between 1996 and 1998. Seals were categorized into three groups, according to sampling area, season and some circumstantial judgements (Fig. 1). Twenty-four seals were killed for damage control along the Sea of Okhotsk coast between January and February, just before breeding season (Group-code: OW), and 11 seals were incidentally caught in the fishing nets during November (Group-code: OF). We considered these two groups as a different group, because of the different sampling seasons, capture methods and age compositions (i.e. most of the OF seals were young, whereas the OW seals had various age structure). The remaining 31 seals were killed for damage control (n=21), found beach-cast (n=9), and incidentally caught in the fishing nets (n=1) at the Sea of Japan coast in the winter (mostly January and February). Although the capture methods for the seals in the Sea of Japan were various, we here considered them as a same group (Group-code: JW). Because they were all collected not only at the same season and area, but all young (0 or 1 yr. old), which was corresponded with the feature of haul-out seals in this area (Mizuno et al., 2001). Tissue samples were stored in 70% ethanol at 5°C, and DNA was extracted using standard proteinase K/phenol/chloroform extraction (Sambrook et al., 1989; Masuda and Yoshida, 1994).

Fig. 1

The geographic distribution of the spotted seal around Japan and the sampling sites for this study. OW = The Sea of Okhotsk coast in winter, OF = The Sea of Okhotsk coast in fall, JW = the Sea of Japan coast in winter.


Amplification and sequencing: Two PCR primers, H34 (5′-CCAAATGCATGACACCACAG-3′) and L16274 (5′-TACACTGGTCTTGTAAACC-3′), were used to amplify a product containing a portion of the threonine and proline tRNA genes and part of the control region (Lamont et al., 1996; Stanley et al., 1996). PCR amplification was carried out, using rTaq DNA polymerase (Takara) with 3 μl of DNA extracts in 50 μl of reaction mixture and GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems), according to manufacture's instructions. Amplification consisted of one cycle of 94°C for 5 min; 50 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s; and one final cycle of 72°C for 7 min. Sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM(TM) 377 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Data analysis: Sequences were aligned using the program Clustal W 1.4 (Thompson et al., 1994). Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbor-joining (Saitou and Nei, 1987) and UPGMA (Sokal and Michener, 1958) using the program MEGA version 2.1 (Kumar et al., 2001). Number of nucleotide substitutions per site was estimated for multiple substitutions using the Kimura's two parameter methods (Kimura, 1980). The reliability of the topology of trees obtained was assessed by 1,000 bootstrap replications (Felsenstein, 1985). Because of its close relationship to the spotted seal (Árnason et al., 1995; O'Corry-Crowe and Westlake, 1997), sequence from the harbor seal Phoca vitulina vitulina (Árnason and Johnsson, 1992) was used as an outgroup for the analysis. The extent of population subdivision among groups was examined using analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier et al., 1992) implemented in ARLEQUIN (Schneider et al., 2000). The analysis was carried out for three comparisons; between seasonal different groups in the Sea of Okhotsk (OF-OW), between different area groups in winter season (JW-OW), and among the all groups (OFOW-JW). The standard variance and haplotypic correlation measures (Φ-statistics) can be used to infer the degree of population subdivision. The significance of the resultant Φ-statistics and variance components were tested with 1,023 permutations.


A total of 571 base pairs of 5′ end of the mtDNA control region, adjacent proline and a portion of the threonine tRNA genes were sequenced for all 66 spotted seals. This fragment was equivalent to the positions 16 273 – 16 826 and 1 – 31 of the published harbor seal sequence (Árnason and Johnsson, 1992). Sixty-six variable sites were observed that define 57 haplotypes (Fig. 2). Sixty-one variable sites were transition substitutions, 2 were transversions, and 3 were length changes (positions 16 484 – 16 485, 16 489, and 16 498 – 16 499) (Fig. 2). Within the 571 base pairs examined, the observed number and the percentage of pairwise differences among haplotypes ranged from 2 to 16, and from 0.2% to 4.0% (average=1.7%, and SD=0.7%), respectively. Comparing with the harbor seal sequences, all 66 spotted seals had three deletions; one base pair long in the threo-nine tRNA gene (position 16 296), and 3 and 11 base pairs long in the mtDNA control region adjacent to the proline tRNA gene (positions 16 378 – 16 380, 16 384 – 16 394) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Aligned mitochondrial control region and adjacent proline and threonine transfer RNA gene sequences from 66 spotted seals, showing variable sites and deletion events (–). Dots (•) represent the same base with those of the haplotype OW1. The 8 shared haplotypes (letters A– H) are also given. Each of the 49 unique haplotypes found in a single spotted seal is identified by a letter code (corresponding to the sampling sites and seasons, in details see text) followed by a number. Variable sites within the 571-bp fragment spanning positions 16 273 – 16 826 and 1 – 31 of the published mitochondrial genome (Pvv) are numbered according to the published harbour seal Phoca vitulina vitulina sequence (Árnason and Johnsson 1992).


Most of the 57 haplotypes were unique to single animals. Only 8 were shared between two or three individuals (Fig. 2; Haplotypes A ∼ H). Six of 8 shared haplotypes were found in the seals belonging to the same group; 2 (A, B), 1 (C), and 3 (D, E, F) haplotypes (Fig. 2) were found in seals at the Okhotsk coast in winter (OW), in fall (OF), and at the Sea of Japan coast in winter (JW), respectively. The other two shared haplotypes were found in seals from both the Sea of Okhotsk and the Sea of Japan; haplotypes G and H (Fig. 2) consisted of OF-JW, and OW-JW, respectively.

In the neighbor-joining and UPGMA trees, there was no obvious phylogenetic structure in each sex, and then we analyzed all individuals together, which also represented no obvious structure.

The AMOVA analyses did not reveal any significant population genetic structure with low Φst value for all comparisons; OF-OW, JW-OW, and OF-OW-JW (p=0.545, 0.236, and 0.603, Φst = −0.003, 0.006 and −0.003, respectively) (Table 1). More than 99 percentages of the variance was accounted for within populations in all comparisons.

Table 1

Analysis of Molecular Variance within and among three spotted seal groups (OW, OF, and JW).



This study provided sequence data of 571 base pairs of the mtDNA control region, proline tRNA and a portion of the threonine tRNA genes in the spotted seal, which have not ever been reported. There was not obvious phylogenetic structure, nor subdivision, which was reflected in the very low estimates of Φ-statistics, among three groups along the Hokkaido coast. Thus, we were not able to deny the possibility that seals in the Okhotsk breeding concentration (OW) mainly stayed in the fall Okhotsk (OF) and also inhabited in the winter Sea of Japan (JW). On the other hand, six of 8 shared haplotypes were found in the seals belonging to the same group. Although each shared haplotypes consisted of a few seals (2–3), it might provide the possibility that the spotted seal form the genetically close related small group.

Comparing with the harbor seal sequence (Árnason and Johnsson, 1992), two deletions in the control region were found in the all 66 spotted seals in this study. These deletions were corresponded with those reported in the Alaska and Kamchatka spotted seals (O'Corry-Crowe and Westlake, 1997). Therefore, the result in the present study supported the previous statement (O'Corry-Crowe and Westlake, 1997) that the deletions proved to be a useful species-specific marker between the spotted seal and the harbor seal.

Since the intra-specific genetic study of the spotted seal have not been enough reported, we here discuss those referring to the close related species, the harbor seal. First, we compared our results to those of the sympatric harbor seal (the Kuril Seal Phoca vitulina stejnegeri) in Hokkaido waters. We found 57 haplotypes in the mtDNA of 66 spotted seals, whereas in the Hokkaido Kuril seal, only 11 haplo-types with 16 variable sites were found in the almost same mtDNA regions from 110 animals, where the pairwise differences ranged from 1 to 9 (Watanabe Y., unpublished data). Watanabe (unpublished data) discussed that little numbers of haplotypes and strong population structure depending on the geographical area in Kuril seals caused from the population bottleneck and the ecological features. The Kuril seal haul out and breed on certain rocky reef, with strong fidelity to the haul-out site (Wada et al., 1986). Because of these ecological features, the Kuril seal might have been easily affected from human activities in Hokkaido. Their abundance was drastically declined by hunting, habitat destruction, and unknown causes between 1940s and 1970s (Itoo and Shukunobe, 1986), although it has been increasing in recent years (Nakaoka, 1997). On the other hand, spotted seals breed on the pack ice (Shaughnessy and Fay, 1977), and have a high mobile ability (Lowry et al., 1998) without year-round fidelity to the haul-out site (Aoki, 1996). In Hokkaido, this feature of the spotted seal might contribute to reduce damages from habitat disturbance and to keep their various mtDNA haplotypes, in contrast to the Kuril seal. Spotted seal genetic diversity is, however, comparable to that found among the eastern Pacific harbor seal that have not experienced a significant reduction in numbers, where Lamont et al. (1996) found 30 variable sites and 47 haplo-types within the 320 bp of the control region of 86 seals, with pairwise divergence levels (ranged from 1 to 16) similar to those we found among spotted seals.

Considering spotted seal's high mobile ability (Lowry et al., 1998) and age specific distribution (Mizuno et al., 2001), the large amount of mtDNA variation and no genetic structure in this study suggest that their population range will not be limited to Hokkaido waters. These genetic features also might indicate possibly due to lack of a severe population bottleneck at some time in the past, or/and due to their “random migration” among some breeding concentrations.

Further genetic intra-specific study will clarify the relationship among the breeding concentrations adjacent Hokkaido waters; the Mamiya Strait, the southern Sakhalin, Peter the Great Bay, and the Liaodong Gulf. Combination with the behavioral approach such as satellite-linked tagging (in the Bering and Chukchi Seas: Frost et al., 1993; Lowry et al., 1998), we will have non-biased information of spotted seal population structure and the range, which contribute to define the management unit for wildlife conservation. It will work for risk assessment against the human activities such as incidental catches in fishing net and damage control kills on seal survival.


We would like to thank fishermen's cooperative associations and fishermen in Haboro, Ohmu, Sarufutsu, and Saroma Town, marine mammal hunters in Shakotan and Rausu town, and staffs of Otaru Aquarium, Y. Goto, I. Chiba, M. Tsunokawa, A. Wada, colleagues in the Graduate school of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, and members of the Kuril Seal Research Group for specimen collection; T. Kariya, Y. Watanabe for DNA procedure and collecting references; T. Saitoh and R. Masuda for a valuable comment in data analysis and early draft of this paper.



N. Aoki 1996. Spotted seals. In “The Encyclopaedia of animals in Japan, Mammals II vol. 2”. Ed by K. Izawa, T. Kasuya, and T. Kawamichi . Heibonsha. Tokyo. pp. 98–99. (in Japanese). Google Scholar


Ú Árnason and E. Johnsson . 1992. The Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the Harbor seal, Phoca vitulina. J Mol Evol 34:493–505. Google Scholar


Ú Árnason, K. Bodin, A. Gullberg, C. Ledje, and S. Mouchaty . 1995. A molecular view of pinniped relationships with particular emphasis on the true seals. J Mol Evol 40:78–85. Google Scholar


M. A. Bigg 1981. Harbour seal Phoca vitulina Linnaeus, 1758 and Phoca largha Pallas, 1811. In “Handbook of marine mammals, vol. 2: Seals”. Ed by S. H. Ridgway and R. J. Harrison . Academic Press. London. pp. 1–28. Google Scholar


T. M. Burg, A. W. Trites, and M. J. Smith . 1999. Mitochondria and microsatellite DNA analyses of harbour seal population structure in the northern Pacific Ocean. Can J Zool 77:930–943. Google Scholar


A. E. Dizon, S. J. Chivers, and W. F. Perrin . 1997. Molecular Genetics of Marine Mammals. Soc Mar Mammal. Special Publication 3. Lawrence, KS. pp. 1–388. Google Scholar


L. Excoffier, P. E. Smouse, and J. M. Quattro . 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplo-types: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491. Google Scholar


G. A. Fedoseev 1984. Use of nonmetrical characters of skulls of Bering Sea seals in a study of the phenotypic structure of their populations. US Dep Commer, NOAA Tech Rep NMFS 12:49–54. Google Scholar


G. A. Fedoseev, Yu A. Bukhtiyarov, and G. G. Shmakova . 1979. Comparative analysis of craniological characters of the Okhotsk Sea seals with respect to the structure of their populations. Zoologichesky Zhurnal 58:570–581. in Russian with English summary. Google Scholar


J. Felsenstein 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791. Google Scholar


K. J. Frost, L. F. Lowry, and G. Carroll . 1993. Beluga whale and spotted seal use of a coastal lagoon system in the northeastern Chukchi Sea. Arctic 46:8–16. Google Scholar


T. Itoo and T. Shukunobe . 1986. Number and present status of the Kuril seal. In “Proceedings of the Symposium on Ecology and Protection of the Kuril Seal”Ed by K. Wada, T. Ito, y Niizuma, S. Hayama, and M. Suzuki . Tokai Univ Press. Tokyo. pp. 18–58. in Japanese with English summary. Google Scholar


M. Kimura 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120. Google Scholar


G. M. Kosygin and V. N. Gol'tsev . 1974. Data on the morphology and ecology of the harbour seal of the Tatar Strait. In “Research on Marine Mammals”. Ed by K. K. Chapskii and E. S. Mil'chenko . AtlantNIRO 39. Russia. Translated from Russian by Fish Mar Serv, Canada, Transl 3185 in 1974;. 238–252. Google Scholar


S. Kumar, K. Tamura, I. B. Jakobsen, and M. Nei . 2001. MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software, Bioinformatics Vol. 17 12:1244–1245. Google Scholar


M. M. Lamont, J. T. Vida, J. T. Harvey, S. Jeferies, R. Brown, H. H. Huber, R. DeLong, and W. K. Thomas . 1996. Genetic substructure of the Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardsi) off Washington, Oregon, and California. Mar Mamm Sci 12:402–413. Google Scholar


L. F. Lowry, K. J. Frost, R. Davis, D. P. DeMaster, and R. S. Suydam . 1998. Movements and behavior of satellite-tagged spotted seals (Phoca largha) in the Bering and Chukchi seas. Polar Biol 19:221–230. Google Scholar


R. Masuda and M. C. Yoshida . 1994. Nucleotide sequence variation of cytochrome b genes in three species of weasels, Mustela itatsi, Mustela sibirica, and Mustela nivalis, detected by improved PCR product-direct sequencing technique. J Mamm Soc Japan 19:33–43. Google Scholar


A. W. Mizuno and N. Ohtaishi . 2002. Cranial features of the spotted seal, Phoca largha, in the Nemuro Strait, considering age effects. J Vet Med Sci 64:137–144. Google Scholar


A. W. Mizuno, M. Suzuki, and N. Ohtaishi . 2001. Distribution of the spotted seal Phoca largha along the coast of Hokkaido, Japan. Mamm Study 26:109–118. Google Scholar


A. W. Mizuno, A. Wada, T. Ishinazaka, K. Hattori, Y. Watanabe, and N. Ohtaishi . 2002. Distribution and abundance of spotted seals Phoca largha and ribbon seals Phoca fasciata in the southern Sea of Okhotsk. Ecol Research 17:79–96. Google Scholar


Y. Naito and M. Nishiwaki . 1975. Ecology and morphology of Phoca vitulina largha and Phoca krilensis in the southern Sea of Okhotsk and northeast of Hokkaido. Rapp P-v Réun Cons int Explor Mer 169:379–386. Google Scholar


Y. Naito and S. Konno . 1979. The post-breeding distributions of ice-breeding harbour seal (Phoca largha) and ribbon seal (Phoca fasciata) in the southern sea of Okhotsk. Sci Rep Whales Res Inst 31:105–119. Google Scholar


T. Nakaoka 1997. Conservation and management of the Kuril seal and the fisheries. In “Biology of Marine Mammals 2nd edition”. Ed by N. Miyazaki and T. Kasuya . Scientist Inc. Tokyo. pp. 305–311. in Japanese. Google Scholar


G. M. O'Corry-Crowe and R. L. Westlake . 1997. Molecular investigations of spotted seals (Phoca largha) and harbor seals (P. vitulina), and their relationship in areas of sympatry. In “Molecular Genetics of Marine Mammals”. Ed by A. E. Dizon, S. J. Chivers, W. F. Perrin, and Mammal Soc Mar . Special Publication 3. Lawrence, KS. pp. 291–304. Google Scholar


N. Saitou and M. Nei . 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. Google Scholar


J. Sambrook, E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis . 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press. New York. Google Scholar


S. Schneider, D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier . 2000. Arlequin ver 2.000: a soft ware for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Dept of Anthropology and Ecology. Univ of Geneva. Geneva. Google Scholar


P. D. Shaughnessy and F. H. Fay . 1977. A review of the taxonomy and nomenclature of North Pacific harbour seals. J Zool 182:385–419. Google Scholar


R. R. Sokal and C. D. Michener . 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationship. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 28:1409–1438. Google Scholar


H. F. Stanley, S. Casey, J. M. Carnahan, S. Goodman, J. Harwood, and R. K. Wayne . 1996. Worldwide patterns of mitochondrial DNA differentiation in the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Mol Biol Evol 13:368–382. Google Scholar


J. D. Thompson, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson . 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680. Google Scholar


A. M. Trukhin and A. W. Mizuno . 2002. Distribution and abundance of the 788 largha seal (Phoca largha Pall.) on the coast of Primorye Region (Russia): a literature review and survey report. Mamm Study 27:1–14. Google Scholar


H. Uno and M. Yamanaka . 1988. Pinnipedia. In “Animals of Shiretoko”. Ed by N. Ohtaishi and H. Nakagawa . Hokkaido Univ Press. Sapporo. pp. 225–248. in Japanese. Google Scholar


K. Wada, T. Itoo, A. Niizuma, S. Hayama, and M. Suzuki . 1986. Proceedings of the symposium on ecology and protection of the Kuril sealTokai Univ Press. Tokyo. 418. pp (in Japanese with English summary). Google Scholar
Ayako W. Mizuno, Manabu Onuma, Manami Takahashi, and Noriyuki Ohtaishi "Population Genetic Structure of the Spotted Seal Phoca largha along the Coast of Hokkaido, Based on Mitochondrial DNA Sequences," Zoological Science 20(6), 783-788, (1 June 2003).
Received: 19 April 2002; Accepted: 1 February 2003; Published: 1 June 2003

Back to Top