Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2003 Leptogenys khammouanensis sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). A Possible Troglobitic Species of Laos, with a Discussion on Cave Ants
Eric Roncin, Louis Deharveng
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The new species Leptogenys khammouanensis sp. nov. is described from two caves of the Khammouan karst (Laos). It is characterized by a set of striking morphological characters (reduced eyes, light pigmentation, slender body and very elongated legs and antennae), which recall the troglobiomorphic traits of cave arthropods. Relations between caves and ants are discussed at this occasion, in the light of the recent biological explorations of caves in Southeast Asia. The classical view that ants are rare and unimportant in caves is challenged. Ants are actually major and regular components of guano assemblages in many caves of the region, but none of these guano species exhibit cave-related adaptation in its external morphology. Conversely, ants are very rare in low-resources habitats, where only accidental occurrence of outside species are reported in Southeast Asia. Leptogenys khammouanensis has been found only in such an oligotrophic environment, very deep in the cave and far from any guano deposits. Its presence there, together with its troglobiomorphic traits, support the idea that Leptogenys khammouanensis might be the first truly troglobitic ant.

INTRODUCTION

The pantropical genus Leptogenys presently includes 215 species of which 54 species and 28 subspecies are known from the Oriental region. African species have been revised by Bolton (1975) and Melanesian species by Wilson (1958). A revision of the Neotropical species by J. Lattke is on the way. No similar work exists for the Oriental region. Most species were described posteriorly to the only treatment of the Asian Leptogenys by Mayr (1879). The species of India have been keyed out by Forel (1900) and Bingham (1903), and Chinese fauna has recently been revised with several new species described (Xu 1996, 2000; Zhou 2001).

In this work, we describe Leptogenys khammouanensis sp. nov. collected in two caves of Laos. It exhibits the combination of morphological characters which defines troglobiomorphy in arthropods (Christiansen, 1965): reduced eyes, elongate appendages (legs and antennae), light color. The possible troglobitic status of the new species is discussed in the context of our knowledge of Southeast Asia cave ants.

MEASUREMENTS AND INDICES

All measurements were made on specimens in alcohol using a Leitz Weitzlar Stereomicroscope at magnifications of ×150, ×100, and ×50 for total Length. Measurements (in millimeters) and abbreviations used here are based on Bolton (1975),Ward (1989) and Roncin (2002). Total Length (TL): Total length of an individual, from the mandibular apex to the gastral apex. Head Length (HL): Length of the head, excluding the mandibles. This measurement is taken in frontal view on the sagittal line from the foremost point of the cly-peal margin (or its projection if situated laterally to the line) to the most posterior point on the occipital margin (or its projection). Head Width (HW): Maximum head width of the head measured in full-face view excluding the eyes. Scape Length (SL): Length of the first antennal segment, excluding the condylus. Cephalic index (CI): (HW / HL) × 100. Scape Index (SI): (SL / HW) × 100. Eye Diameter (EL): Maximal length of eye. Pronotal Width (PrW): Maximum width of pronotum in dorsal view. Mesosoma Length (ML): Diagonal length of the mesosoma, measured in lateral view from the point at which the pronotum meets the collare to the base of the propodeal lobes. Often called Weber's length of mesosoma. Petiole Height (PH): Height of the petiole measured in profile from the apex of the ventral (subpetiolar) process vertically to a line intersecting the dorsalmost point of the node. Petiole length (PL): Length of the petiole from the anterior flanges to the posteriormost point of the petiole. Lateral Petiole Index (LPI): (PH / PL) × 100. Dorsal Petiole Width (DPW): Maximum width of the petiole, measured in dorsal view. Dorsal Petiole Index (DPI): (DPW / PL) × 100.

DESCRIPTION

Genus Leptogenys Roger, 1861

Leptogenys khammouanensis sp. nov.

(Fig. 1: a–d)

Fig. 1

Leptogenys khammouanensis sp. nov. a–d, holotype worker. a, lateral view; b, dorsal view; c, head in frontal view; d, anterior part of head with clypeal setae figured.

i0289-0003-20-7-919-f01.gif

Description of Holotype (worker). TL 7.6, HL 1.54, HW 1.01, CI 65, SL 1.99, SI 197, EL 0.09, PrW 0.71, ML 2.55, PH 0.46, PL 0.77, LPI 59, DPW 0.32, DPI 0.40

Head elongate, quite narrow, slightly broadened anteri-orly, broadest across the eyes, the sides feebly convex. Occipital margin passing to lateral margin by a regular curve. A low nuchal carina present. Eyes small, oval, composed of 15–20 ommatidia. Maximum diameter of eye 0.093 mm, about 0.09 × HW, that is less than the maximum width of the scapes (0.127 mm). Eyes well in front of the middle of head sides, with their posterior borders situated on the same level than the posterior end of the frontal carinae in full face view. Eyes position frontal, not overlapping the outlines of head sides in full-face view. Circumocular groove strongly developed. Mandibles not striated, weakly shining, with feeble puncturations more numerous near masticatory border. Masticatory margin of mandibles with 14 teeth: the two apical ones well developed and followed by three denticles, one tooth and a series of 8 small teeth and denticles. Basal margin of mandibles close to the basal tooth of the apical margin with small crenulations. Clypeus triangular, projecting anteriorly as a distinct lobe closing tightly against the basal border of the mandibles, and with its foremost part broadly truncated. A wide longitudinal carina present on the median portion of clypeus. Anterior border of clypeus biden-tate due to two massive enlarged central setae and laterally a row of normal and straight setae, all much shorter than other cephalic setae. Antennal scapes extremely long surpassing the occipital margin by almost half their length, with numerous erect to subdecumbent hairs, most of them being half the scape width. Funicular segments elongate : length of segments 1–3 ca 0.254, 0.422, 0.355 respectively (the partly visible condylar bulb of the first antennal segment is exclude from this measurement). Funicular segment 11: length 0.232; width 0.131.

Mesosoma elongate. Pronotum widest behind the middle, narrower in front than behind. Mesonotum markedly elongate (dorsal length of mesonotum 0.659 mm, taken at the level of the anterior border of metathoracic spiracles) and approximately of the same length than pronotum length (collare excluded) in dorsal view. Mesosoma shallowly depressed between mesonotum and propodeal dorsum but without any trace of the transverse metanotal suture. A transverse carina present on the posterior end of the declivitous face of propodeum surrounding insertion of petiolar peduncle. A low longitudinal median carina is present on the mesosternum and is crossed by small wrinkles. Legs extremely long, with metafemur length (2.10 mm) exceeding gaster length.

Node of the petiole in dorsal view much longer than broad. Anterior part of the node with a carina separating it from the true anterior peduncle which is indeed very short. Dorsal outline of the anterior part of the node concave in lateral view. The node is widening progressively backward, giving to the anterior part of the node an aspect of false peduncle.

Gaster constricted between its first and second segment. Sting relatively short.

All body sculpture smooth. Body color light orange-yellow with small brown spots regularly spaced at the basis of body setae. Callow individuals yellow. Body with a dense pilosity especially on head, gaster and coxae, and with the longest hairs situated on clypeus, ventral surface of the head capsule and procoxae.

Gyne and male unknown.

Etymology. From “Khammouan”, a province of Laos with beautiful calcareous landscapes, uncountable caves and subterranean rivers.

Type material. Holotype worker, Laos: Tham (= cave) Nam Non (18.0270° N, 104.6883° E, coordinates from Brouquisse, 1999), alt. 185 m, several km inside the cave, hand collecting, 15.II.1999, (LAO-070), J. Lordon and J.F. Vacquié.

Paratypes workers: 2 workers, same data; collected with holotype.

Other material: 4 workers, Laos: Ban Nakok: Tham Thê cave (17.9964° N, 104.4482° E, coordinates from Brouquisse, 1999), 11.II.1998, (LAO-016), collected at about 500 m from cave mouth, hand collecting, L. Deharveng and A. Bedos.

Standard measurements: workers. TL 7.0-7.8, HL 1.54-1.65, HW 0.98-1.05 CI 64-65, SL 1.94-2.12, SI 197-201, EL 0.09, PrW 0.66-0.74, ML 2.42-2.64, PH 0.45-0.50, PL 0.76-0.84, LPI 58-59, DPW 0.29-0.32, DPI 0.38-0.40 One worker from the type locality possesses on the right side an abnormal eye of circular shape reduced to a single large ommatidia of 0.041 mm diameter.

The holotype of the new species is deposited in the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris (MNHN) and the paratypes in the author's collection.

Remarks. The general habitus of Leptogenys khammouanensis with very elongate head, mesosoma, petiole, antennae and legs is very similar to that of Leptogenys assamensisForel, 1900, a species that seems to be known only from the type series collected by Long in the Garó hills in Assam (E. India), and to Leptogenys ergatogyna Wheeler, 1922, a forest species known from Zaire, Uganda and Cameroun and which presents few affinities to other African species (Bolton, 1975). However, Leptogenys assamensis and Leptogenys ergatogyna differ from L. khammouanensis by the presence in both species of the metanotal suture, the absence of a pair of enlarged, straight and hard setae on the clypeal lobe border, less mandibular teeth (no mandibular teeth in L. assamensis and only two apical teeth in L. ergatogyna) and by other characters (color, eyes size) discussed in the paragraph below concerning troglobiomorphic characters in Leptogenys.

DISCUSSION

The combination of reduced eyes, very pale color and elongate appendages isolates Leptogenys khammouanensis in its genus. Short of a revision of Oriental Leptogenys, it is impossible to assess its affinities, especially because these conspicuous morphological traits are adaptive to hypogean life. For this reason, however, they are of great interest, as they point to an unusual mode of life for an ant. The possibility of troglobitic life for ants has long puzzled specialists (see Wilson, 1962), and is still a matter of debate (Tinaut and López, 2001). Compared to other ant candidates to troglobitic life, L. khammouanensis is one step ahead in terms of morphological characters linked to cave life. This question of troglobitic and troglobiomorphic ants will be discussed below, taking into account recent literature and the rich material of cave ants we have gathered in Southeast Asia.

Assessing the troglobitic status of a taxon is not easy. However, troglomorphy (Christiansen, 1962), or better troglobiomorphy (Boutin, in press), i.e. the set of morphological traits characteristics of cave organisms, is always a strong indication of troglobitism (while the opposite is not always true). Troglobiomorphy in arthropods is defined by four morphological traits: loss of wings in winged arthropod groups, reduction of eyes, reduction of tegumentary pigment and elongation of appendages (Vandel, 1964; Christiansen, 1965; Culver, 1982; Marques and Gnaspini, 2001). All known specimens of L. khammouanensis are workers, which are always apterous in ants. We do not know therefore the state of the first character in the new species, but the last three traits are present.

Troglobiomorphic characters in Leptogenys

The small eyes and light color of L. khammouanensis recall those of the group of L. processionalis sensu Taylor (1969) (= fallax-group of Andersen, 2000), which comprises three Australian species, L. fallax (Mayr, 1876), L. tricosa Taylor, 1969 and L. fortiorForel 1900, and the Oriental species L. myops (Emery, 1887), L. crassicornis Emery, 1895 and L. processionalis (Jerdon, 1851). Species of this group possess also light color and reduced eyes varying from a single (L. tricosa) to about fifteen facets, but antennae are short, and size is small. Such a morphology appears as a classical adaptation to endogeous, not to cave life. At least several African species in the guineensis- and the nitida-group also possess small eyes, and are yellow brown to dark brown. However their head and appendages are so not elongated.

In its slender habitus (very elongate head, mesosoma, petiole, antennae and legs), Leptogenys khammouanensis is similar to Leptogenys ergatogyna Arnold 1954 from Africa (redescribed in Bolton, 1975) and to L. assamensis Forel, 1900 from Assam (redescribed by Bingham, 1903). But both species differ from L. khammouanensis by their black color and larger eyes, and cannot be considered as troglobiomorphic.

No species of Leptogenys therefore approaches L. khammouanensis in its combination of troglobiomorphic characters.

Troglobiomorphic ants

Only one species of Formicidae, Aphaenogaster cardenai Espadaler, 1981, could be associated to subterranean habitats (Decu et al., 1998, Tinaut and López, 2001). This rare Spanish species has always been collected in cryptic habitats: under big rocks, galleries of rodents and caves. However in this latter habitat no nests have ever been found, which led these authors to postulate that A. cardenai is more probably an inhabitant of the MSS (“Milieu Souter-rain Superficiel” of Juberthie et al., 1980, “superficial underground compartment” in Humphreys, 2000), than a strictly cave dwelling species.

A. cardenai is related to A. splendida (Roger, 1859), A. ovaticeps (Emery, 1898) and A. muelleriana Wolf, 1915. All have reduced eyes, slender body, elongate appendages and often pale color, compared to other species of the genus. Bernard (1968: 136) stressed the peculiar morphology of the species then known and noted that they have “un faciès aphaenopsien de cavernicole” (“an Aphaenops-like morphology of cave species”). He supposed they inhabit hypogean habitats, probably deep cracks that they rarely leave, hence their rarity in collection. However a few captures from surface habitats (Forel, 1911; Wheeler and Mann, 1916) could indicate nocturnal activity more than hypogean life.

Leptogenys khammouanensis is therefore the second example in Formicidae with the Aphaenogaster of the splendida-group, and the first Ponerinae, which combines hypogean life with microphthalmy, light color, and elongated appendages, i.e. the typical adaptive characters of cave inhabiting arthropods. None of the splendida-group species of Aphaenogaster is cave-restricted. Conversely, L. khammouanensis was observed only in deep parts of caves and in rather significant numbers, bringing an exciting question to the fore: is L. khammouanensis the first truly troglobitic ant?

Cave ants

Though frequently cited from caves, ants have not provided so far any unambiguously troglobitic species. Most records (Wilson, 1962; Tinaut and López, 2001) concern in fact accidental occurrences, generally not far from cave entrance (Decu et al., 1998). Most species supposed to be strictly cavernicolous have been later found also outside caves. Even the rare Hypoponera ragusai considered by Tinaut (2001) to be limited to caves in Europe has been collected outside caves in France (Bernard, 1968) and in the Mediterranean islands of Lampedusa and Linosa (Mei, 1992, 1995).

This rarity of ants in caves concerns essentially temperate regions. Though limited, available evidence suggests that Formicidae might be much more frequent in tropical caves. More than sixty species have already been collected from the dark part of various caves of Southeast Asia (Roncin et al., 2001, and unpublished data). Most of these species, well-known outside, are represented by isolated specimens in cave collections. But several are regular guano inhabitants, like Hypoponera confinis in the Farm caves of Myanmar (Annandale et al., 1913) and an unidentified species in the Mulu caves of Sarawak (Chapman, 1982). In fact, ants were present in most guano caves recently sampled in Southeast Asia, with Hypoponera the dominant genus (Roncin et al., 2001). They were sometimes found very far from cave entrance, living in loose colonies, foraging in or around the guano piles, where they are believed to prey on a rich fauna of micro- and meso-arthropods. None of these regular guano species are troglobiomorphic, and all were also collected outside caves. Among the hundreds of caves prospected so far in all regions of Southeast Asia (see Juberthie and Decu, 2001 for an overview), troglobiomorphic species were found only in Laos with L. khammouanensis.

Leptogenys khammouanensis was encountered far from the entrance in two big caves, Tham Nam Non (22 km long, the longest cave of continental Southeast Asia, Mouret, 2001) and Tham Thê (2.2 km long, Brouquisse, 1999). In spite of being 25 km apart and in different hydro-geological systems, both caves do belong to the same, uninterrupted, huge limestone unit. In Tham Nam Non, L. khammouanensis was collected at about 4.5 km of the entrance. These giant caves of the Khammouan karst host a rich troglobitic fauna, only recently discovered: micro-phthalmic crabs (Erebusa calobates, Yeo and Ng), various blind terrestrial Isopods, Araneids and Millipeds (Polydesmidae, Glomeridae), Campodeids, springtails, blind Nocticolid cockroaches, blind or microphthalmic Diestrammena sp. crickets (Besson et al., 2001). As numerous species of Leptogenys are woodlices-hunters (for a full list of references see: Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990; Dejean 1997), the terrestrial isopods frequent in these caves could constitute a potential diet of L. khammouanensis, but this has to be confirmed.

The genus Leptogenys has already been found in caves. Leptogenys jeanneli Santschi, 1914 was described from a cave in Tanzania, and Leptogenys diminuta (Smith, 1857) was collected in the Batu Caves of peninsular Malaysia (Wilson, 1962; McClure, 1965). However, none of these species is cave-restricted, and none exhibits the combination of troglobiomorphic traits of L. khammouanensis.

Having analysed what was known about cave ants, Wilson (1962) hypothesized that social insects “never become truly troglobitic” because “they are unable to maintain sufficiently large cave demes” (implicitly because of food scarcity). The well-known link between troglobiomorphy and oligotrophic habitats (Deharveng and Bedos, 2000) certainly explains the extreme difficulty for ants to establish long-term colonies and to adapt to cave environment. This view is challenged today by the discovery of L. khammouanensis with its clear troglobiomorphic morphology. The unusually large underground voids of Laos may have given the opportunity for such an evolution to take place, by providing large food reservoirs on the long-term. To confirm this exciting hypothesis, it remains to document the peculiarities of the biology and social life of the new species (Tinaut and López, 2001).

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the 1998 and 1999 French caving expedition to Laos, who provided the specimens, especially Anne Bedos, Jérome Lordon, and Jean-François Vacquié. Bernard Kauf-mann and Hervé Jourdan made useful comments on the manuscript. We further thank Penelope Greenslade and Robert Taylor for style improvment of large parts of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1.

A. N. Andersen 2000. The ants of northern Australia. A guide to the monsoonal fauna. CSIRO Publishing. Collingwood. Google Scholar

2.

N. Annandale, J. Coggin Brown, and F. H. Gravely . 1913. The limestone caves of Burma and the Malay Peninsula. J Proc Asiat Soc Bengal 9:391–424. Google Scholar

3.

G. Arnold 1954. New Formicidae from Kenya and Uganda. Ann Mus R Congo Belg Zool 1:291–295. Google Scholar

4.

F. Bernard 1968. Les fourmis (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) d'Europe occidentale et septentrionale. Masson. Paris. Google Scholar

5.

J. P. Besson, L. Deharveng, and F. Brehier . 2001. Laos. In “Encyclopaedia Biospeologica Tome 3”. Ed by C. Juberthie and V. Decu . Soc Biospéologie. Moulis. pp. 1883–1889. Google Scholar

6.

C. T. Bingham 1903. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera. 2. Ants and Cuckoo-wasps. Taylor and Francis. London. Google Scholar

7.

B. Bolton 1975. A revision of the ant genus Leptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Ethiopian Region with a review of the Malagasy species. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist (Entomol) 31:237–305. Google Scholar

8.

Boutin C Organisms classification In “Encyclopedia of cave and karst science”. Ed by J. Gunn Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers. London. in press. Google Scholar

9.

F. Brouquisse 1999. Catalogue of caves in the Lao peoples's Democratic Republic. Int Caver 25:13–16. Google Scholar

10.

P. Chapman 1982. The ecology of caves in the Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. Trans Br Cave Res Assoc 9:142–162. Google Scholar

11.

K. A. Christiansen 1962. Proposition pour la classification des animaux cavernicoles. Spelunca 2:76–78. Google Scholar

12.

K. A. Christiansen 1965. Behavior and form in the evolution of cave Collembola. Evolution 19:529–537. Google Scholar

13.

D. Culver 1982. Cave life, evolution and ecology. Harvard Univ Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

14.

V. Decu, A. Casale, P. L. Scaramozzino, F. López, and A. Tinaut . 1998. 924 Hymenoptera. In “Encyclopaedia Biospeologica Tome 2”. Ed by C. Juberthie and V. Decu . Soc Biospéologie. Moulis and Bucarest. pp. 1015–1024. Google Scholar

15.

L. Deharveng and A. Bedos . 2000. The cave fauna of southeast Asia. Origin, evolution and ecology. In “Ecosystems of the world Vol 30 Subterranean ecosystems”. Ed by H. Wilkens, D. C. Culver, and W. F. Humphreys . Elsevier. Amsterdam. pp. 603–632. Google Scholar

16.

A. Dejean 1997. Predatory behavior in the genus Leptogenys: a comparative story. J Insect Behav 10:177–191. Google Scholar

17.

A. Forel 1900. Les formicides de l'Empire des Indes et de Ceylan. Part. 7. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 13:303–332. Google Scholar

18.

A. Forel 1911. Fourmis nouvelles ou intéressantes. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 47:331–400. Google Scholar

19.

B. Hölldobler and E. O. Wilson . 1990. The ants. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Google Scholar

20.

W. F. Humphreys 2000. Background and glossary. In “Ecosystems of the world Vol 30 Subterranean ecosystems”. Ed by H. Wilkens, D. C. Culver, and W. F. Humphreys . Elsevier. Amsterdam. pp. 3–14. Google Scholar

21.

C. Juberthie and V. Decu . 2001. Encyclopaedia Biospeologica Tome 3. Soc Biospéologie. Moulis. pp. 1375–2294. Google Scholar

22.

C. Juberthie, B. Delay, and M. Bouillon . 1980. Extension du milieu souter-rain en zone non calcaire : description d'un nouveau milieu et de son peuplement par les Coléoptères troglobies. Mém Biospéol 7:19–52. Google Scholar

23.

A. C. Marques and P. Gnaspini . 2001. The problem of characters susceptible to parallel evolution in phylogenetic reconstructions: suggestion of a practical method and its application to cave animals. Cladistics 17:371–381. Google Scholar

24.

G. Mayr 1879. Beiträge zur Ameisen-Fauna Asiens. Verh K K Zool Bot Ges Wien 28:645–686. Google Scholar

25.

H. E. McClure 1965. Microcosms of Batu caves. Malay Nat J 19:65–74. Google Scholar

26.

C. Mouret 2001. Le karst du Khammouane au Laos central. Spelunca 84:7–32. Google Scholar

27.

M. Mei 1992. Su alcune species endogee o cryptobiotiche della myrmecofauna italiana (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Fragm Entomol 23:411–422. Google Scholar

28.

M. Mei 1995. Arthropoda di Lampedusa, Linosa e Pantelleria (Canale di Sicilia, Mar Mediterraneo). Hymenoptera Formicidae (con diagnosi di due nuove specie). Nat Sicil 19:Suppl53–772. Google Scholar

29.

E. Roncin 2002. Two new Tetramorium species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Vietnam with a discussion of the mixtum, tonganum and scabrosum groups. Sociobiology 40:281–292. Google Scholar

30.

E. Roncin, L. Deharveng, and A. Bedos . 2001. Cave ants in Southeast Asia. In. “XV International Symposium of Biospeleology” IntervalesSão Paulo (Brasil)8–15 July 2001Abstracts. 66–67. Google Scholar

31.

R. Taylor 1969. The identity of Dorylozelus mjobergi Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) J Aust Entomol Soc. 8:131–133. Google Scholar

32.

A. Tinaut 2001. Hypoponera ragusai (Emery, 1895) a cavernicolous ant new for the Iberian peninsula (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Graellsia 57:3–8. Google Scholar

33.

A. Tinaut and F. López . 2001. Ants and caves: sociability and ecological constraints (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Sociobiology 37:651–659. Google Scholar

34.

A. Vandel 1964. Biospéologie. La biologie des animaux cavernicoles. Gauthier Villars. Paris. Google Scholar

35.

P. S. Ward 1989. Systematic studies on pseudomyrmecine ants: revision of the Pseudomyrmex occulatus and P. subtilissimus species groups, with taxonomic comments on other species. Quaest Entomol 25:393–468. Google Scholar

36.

W. M. Wheeler and W. M. Mann . 1916. The ants of the Phillips expedition to Palestine during 1914. Bull Mus Comp Zool 59:167–174. Google Scholar

37.

E. O. Wilson 1958. Studies on the ant fauna of Melanesia. Studies on the ant fauna of Melanesia. 1. The tribe Leptogenyini. 2. The tribes Amblyoponini and Platythyreini. Bull Mus Comp Zool 118:101–153. Google Scholar

38.

E. O. Wilson 1962. The trinidad cave ant Erebomyrma (= Spelaeomyrmex) urichi (Wheeler), with a comment on cavernicolous ants in general. Psyche 69:62–72. Google Scholar

39.

Z. Xu 1996. A taxonomic study on the ant genus Leptogenys (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in China [in Chinese]. J Yunnan Agric Univ 11:222–227. Google Scholar

40.

Z. Xu 2000. Five new species and one new record species of the ant genus Leptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Yunnan Province, China. Entomol Sinica 7:117–126. Google Scholar

41.

S. Zhou 2001. Ants of Guangxi [in Chinese]. Guangxi Normal University Press. Guilin. Google Scholar
Eric Roncin and Louis Deharveng "Leptogenys khammouanensis sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). A Possible Troglobitic Species of Laos, with a Discussion on Cave Ants," Zoological Science 20(7), 919-924, (1 July 2003). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.20.919
Received: 12 July 2002; Accepted: 1 March 2003; Published: 1 July 2003
KEYWORDS
cave ants
Laos
Leptogenys
taxonomy
troglobiomorphy
Back to Top