This study was carried out in Rome city from 1991 to 1999. In a total of 47 urban parks and suburban woods, 22 wooded areas were occupied by Great Spotted Woodpeckers during the breeding period. All woods greater than 50 ha in area were occupied by woodpeckers. On a five year scale, territorial stability was positively correlated with woodland size. The requirement of wooded area per territory was slightly higher in urban parks (6.7 ± 2.7 ha, n = 10 wooded areas) than in suburban woods (5.7 ± 1.3 ha, n = 5), and was negatively correlated to the vegetation cover. The area of woodland per territory in Rome was higher than in neighbouring deciduous oak woods. This suggests that urban habitats are of inferior quality for breeding Great Spotted Woodpeckers, probably owing to features of their vegetation and their isolation from other woodland patches. Maintaining mature stands of natural vegetation with old and dead trees in larger urban parks could be useful to encourage the occurrence of Great Spotted Woodpecker in cities.
REFERENCES
P. Angelstam
,
G. Mikusiński
1994. Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest — a review. Ann. Zool. Fennici 31: 157–172. Google Scholar
F. Attorre
,
A. Rossetti
,
B. Sbrega
,
F. Bruno
1999. Landscape changes in Rome, Italy. Coenosis 13: 57–64. Google Scholar
P.E. Bellamy
,
N. J. Brown
,
B. Enoksson
,
L. G. Firbank
,
R. J. Fuller
,
S. A. Hinsley
,
A. G. M. Schotman
1998. The influence of habitat, landscape structure and climate on local distribution patterns of the nuthatch (Sitta europaea L.). Oecologia 115: 127–136. Google Scholar
M. Bernoni
,
L. Ianniello
1989. [The breeding Piciformes in the forests of Central Italy]. Avocetta 13: 115–119. Google Scholar
F. Bruno,
C. Blasi
1987. Carta del verde della cittá di Roma (I°-II° Circoscrizione). Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Universitá di Roma “La Sapienza”, Comune di Roma. Google Scholar
M. Flade
1997. Great Spotted Woodpecker. In:
E. J. M. Hagemeijer,
M. J. Blair (eds.).
The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. T & AD Poyser, London, pp. 448–449. Google Scholar
P. Galeotti
1994. Patterns of territory size and defense level in rural and urban Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) populations. J. Zool. (London) 234: 641–658. Google Scholar
L. Hansson
1992. Requirements by the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major for a suburban life. Ornis Svec. 2: 1–6. Google Scholar
S. A. Hinsley
,
P. E. Bellamy
,
I. Newton
,
T. H. Sparks
1996. Influences of population size and woodland area on bird species distributions in small woods. Oecologia 105: 100–106. Google Scholar
P. Horak
1993. Low fledging success of urban Great Tits. Ornis Fenn. 70: 168–172. Google Scholar
F. C. James
,
H. H. Shugart
1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. Audubon Field Notes 24: 727–736. Google Scholar
G. Jansson
,
P. Angelstam
1999. Threshold levels of habitat composition for the presence of the long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) in a boreal landscape. Landscape Ecology 14: 283–290. Google Scholar
G. Jansson
,
L. Saari
1999. Suitable habitat distribution for the Long-tailed Tit (Aegithalos caudatus) as indicated by the frequency of occurrence — a long-term study. Ornis Fenn. 76: 115ndash;122. Google Scholar
O. Jarvinen
,
R. A. Vaisanen
1977. Line transect method: a standard for field-work. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 3: 11–15. Google Scholar
V. M. Konstantinov
,
W. Nowicki
,
A. G. Pichurin
1996. Recent changes in the avifauna of cities in European Russian and Eastern Poland — results of a questionnaire. Acta Ornithol. 31: 59–66. Google Scholar
M. Luniak
1990. Avifauna of cities in Central and Eastern Europe — Results of the International Enquiry. In:
M. Luniak (ed.).
Urban ecological studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Ossolineum, Warsaw, pp. 131–149. Google Scholar
M. Luniak
1996. Inventory of the avifauna of Warsaw — species composition, abundance, and habitat distribution. Acta Ornithol. 31: 67–80. Google Scholar
E. Matthysen
,
F. Adriaensen
1998. Forest size and isolation have no effect on reproductive success of Eurasian Nuthatches (Sitta europaea). Auk 115: 955–963. Google Scholar
E. Matthysen
,
F. Adriaensen
,
A. A. Dhondt
1995. Dispersal distances of nuthatches, Sitta europaea, in a highly fragmented forest habitat. Oikos 72: 375–381. Google Scholar
P. F. M. Opdam
1994. Impact of landscape fragmentation on birds, an introduction. In:
E. J. M. Hagemeijer,
T. J. Verstrael (eds.).
Bird Numbers 1992. Distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects. Proc. XII Intern. Conf. IBCC and EOAC, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen & SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, pp. 99–103. Google Scholar
P. Opdam
,
A. Schotman
1987. Small woods in rural landscape as habitat islands for woodland birds. Acta Oecol. 8: 269–274. Google Scholar
G. Renman
,
U. Mortberg
1994. Avifauna — relation to size, configuration and habitat conditions of green urban areas in Stockholm. Memorabilia Zool. 49: 245–255. Google Scholar
J. Rolstad
,
E. Rolstad
,
P. K. Stokke
1995. Feeding habitat and nest-site selection of breeding Great Spotted Woodpeckers Picoides major.
Ornis Fenn. 72: 62–71. Google Scholar
L. Salvati
,
A. Manganaro
1999. Notes on the frequency of Great Spotted Woodpecker (Picoides major) in Rome district (Central Italy). Avocetta 23: 191. Google Scholar
K. W. Smith
1987. Ecology of the Great Spotted Woodpecker. RSPB Conserv. Rev. 1: 74–77. Google Scholar
M. Tjernberg
,
K. Johnsson
,
S. G. Nilsson
1993. Density variation and breeding success of the Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius in relation to forest fragmentation. Ornis Fenn. 70: 155–162. Google Scholar
T. Wesołowski
,
L. Tomiałojć
1986. The breeding ecology of woodpeckers in a temperate primaeval forest — preliminary data. Acta Ornithol. 22: 1–21. Google Scholar
U. Wiktander
,
I. N. Nilsson
,
S. G. Nilsson
,
O. Olsson
,
B. Pettersson
,
A. Stagen
1992. Occurrence of Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos minor in relation to area of deciduous forest. Ornis Fenn. 69: 113–118. Google Scholar
K. Yamauchi
,
S. Yamazaki
,
Y. Fujimaki
1997. Breeding habitats of Dendrocopos major and D. minor in urban and rural areas. Jap. J. Ornithol. 46: 121–131. Google Scholar
