Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
28 August 2009 On the African Whip Scorpion, Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899) (Thelyphonida: Thelyphonidae), with a Redescription Based on New Material from Guinea-Bissau and Senegal
Jeremy C. Huff, Lorenzo Prendini
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

An illustrated redescription of the monotypic African whip scorpion, Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), is provided based on examination of material newly collected in Guinea-Bissau and Senegal, as well as material from the Gambia, Guinea and Senegal studied by previous workers. The species is reported for the first time from Guinea-Bissau. Several character systems are documented in this species for the first time, new characters that appear to be autapomorphic are described, and notes on its natural history provided. The phylogenetic position of E. africanus is discussed, supporting the opinion that it is a Gondwana relict, most closely related to the Neotropical hypoctonine genera, Thelyphonellus Pocock, 1894 and Ravilops Viquez and Armas, 2005.

INTRODUCTION

The arachnid order Thelyphonida, commonly known as whip scorpions or vinegaroons (vinegarones or vinagrillos), comprises 106 described species and 5 subspecies, in 18 genera (8 of which are monotypic) and a single family (Haupt, 1996, 2004; Harvey, 2002, 2003, 2007; Viquez and Armas, 2005, 2006, 2007; Ballesteros and Francke 2006; Armas and Viquez, 2007; Giupponi and Vasconcelos, 2008). Whip scorpions have been poorly studied. Most whip scorpion taxonomy was conducted in the late 1800s and early 1900s; only three genera and 16 species were described in the past 50 years (Haupt, 1996, 2004; Harvey, 2002, 2003, 2007; Viquez and Armas, 2005, 2006, 2007; Ballesteros and Francke, 2006; Armas and Viquez, 2007; Giupponi and Vasconcelos, 2008). Even less is known about their biology. Most research has focused on the composition and function of their defensive spray, consisting largely of acetic acid and caprylic acid (Eisner et al., 1961; Haupt et al., 1988; Schmidt et al., 2000; Haupt and Müller, 2004), which is a strong deterrent to various potential predators (Schmidt et al., 2000). Reproductive behavior and development have also been studied in a few species (Klingel, 1963; Weygoldt, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1988; Schmidt et al., 2000).

Whip scorpions have a disjunct distribution in Africa, Asia, and the New World (Harvey, 2002, 2003). Approximately 80% of the species occur in Asia, extending from India and Sri Lanka to Samoa. Nearly 50% of these are recorded from Myanmar and Indonesia. Although common in New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, whip scorpions are absent from Australia. In the New World, whip scorpions occur in North America, South America, and the Caribbean. Their distribution ranges from the southern United States to Brazil, but they have not been recorded in Panama, Ecuador, or Peru. In the Caribbean, they occur on the islands of Cuba, Hispañola, and Martinique. A single species, Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), occurs in Africa (figs. 1, 2).

Figure 1

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), ♂ (AMNH), habitus. A. dorsal aspect. B. ventral aspect. Scale bar  =  10 mm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f01.jpg

Figure 2

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), (AMNH), habitus. A. , dorsal aspect. B. , ventral aspect. Scale bar  =  10 mm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f02.jpg

Etienneus africanus is currently placed in subfamily Hypoctoninae because it lacks a carina between the lateral and median ocelli. It was previously suggested that no indigenous whip scorpions exist in Africa, and that this species was probably introduced to the Gambia region, 130–150 years ago, in shipments of agricultural material from Burma (Myanmar) or Thailand (Millot, 1949; Cooke and Shadab, 1973). At the time of its discovery, there were two Old World genera of Hypoctoninae, Hypoctonus Thorell, 1888, and Labochirus Pocock, 1894, sharing elaborate modifications of the male pedipalp patellar apophysis, but separated by the presence of an accessory tooth on the internal margin of the pedipalp coxal apophysis in Labochirus that is absent in Hypoctonus (Pocock, 1894, 1900; Kraepelin, 1897, 1899). The African species was originally placed under Hypoctonus because it lacks the accessory tooth; the male, and hence the state of the male pedipalp patellar apophysis, were unknown. Gravely (1916) considered the accessory tooth less important than the tibial spur of leg III, redefined the composition of Hypoctonus and Labochirus, and transferred Hypoctonus africanus Hentschel, 1899, to Labochirus based on the absence of a tibial spur on leg III. Gravely's (1916) classification of Hypoctonus and Labochirus, based on the tibial spur of leg III, was adopted by Mello-Leitão (1931), whereas Werner (1935) and Rowland and Cooke (1973) followed the original classification based on the accessory tooth of the pedipalp coxal apophysis (Pocock, 1894, 1900; Kraepelin, 1897, 1899). Rowland and Cooke (1973) argued that tibial spurs are not reliable characters because they can vary within a species (e.g., H. africanus) and that defining Hypoctonus and Labochirus based on the tibial spur of leg III made little sense biogeographically.

A second African species, Hypoctonus clarki Cooke and Shadab, 1973, morphologically distinct from H. africanus, was subsequently described, and H. africanus redescribed (Cooke and Shadab, 1973). In the early 1980s, the Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, obtained several adult male and female whip scorpions from Senegal and a male specimen from Guinea. Hentschel's (1899) type series of H. africanus was rediscovered and examined. Heurtault (1984) compared the new material with the holotypes of H. africanus and H. clarki, and discovered that H. clarki was in fact the adult male of H. africanus and not the female of another species. Hypoctonus clarki was therefore synonymized with H. africanus. The genus Etienneus Heurtault, 1984 was created to accommodate the lone African species, based on the fact that the male lacks any modification of the pedipalp patellar apophysis, which separates it from both Hypoctonus and Labochirus. Heurtault (1984) suggested that E. africanus is a Gondwana relict and is more closely related phylogenetically to the Neotropical whip scorpion genus Thelyphonellus Pocock, 1894, also a member of the Hypoctoninae, than to the Asian hypoctonine genera.

No further investigations of this unique African whip scorpion were conducted after Heurtault (1984). Its relationship to other whip scorpion genera remains unclear. As part of ongoing investigations into the systematics of Thelyphonida and their relationship to other arachnid orders, the first author travelled to West Africa in the summer of 2005, to collect fresh material of E. africanus for a reinvestigation of its morphology. Several specimens were collected from Senegal, within 30 km of the border with Guinea and 100 km of the border with Mali, and also from Guinea-Bissau, the first record of the species from this country (fig. 3).

Figure 3

Map of West Africa, plotting the known locality records of Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899).

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f03.gif

In the present contribution, we provide an illustrated redescription of this unique whip scorpion, based on examination of the newly collected material as well as material studied by previous workers. We document several character systems in this species for the first time, describe new characters that appear to be autapomorphic, and provide notes on its natural history. Based on our observations, we agree with Heurtault's (1984) hypothesis that E. africanus is a Gondwana relict, most closely related to Thelyphonellus and another recently described Neotropical whip scorpion genus, Ravilops Viquez and Armas, 2005.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Material is deposited in the American Museum of Natural History, New York (AMNH), Natural History Museum, London (BMNH), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN) and Musée Zoologique de l'Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg (MZS). Female genitalia were studied following methods described by Víquez and Armas (2005). Hemispermatophore morphology follows Weygoldt (1971, 1988). General morphological terminology follows Werner (1935) and Millot (1949), except for pedipalp segmentation, which follows Snodgrass (1948). Measurements (mm) were taken with Mitutoyo® digital calipers. Photographs were taken using a Microptics® ML-1000 digital imaging system. Scanning electron micrographs were prepared using a Hitachi® S-4700 scanning electron microscope. Genitalia and hemispermatophores were dissected and cleared using KOH, following Víquez and Armas (2005), and further clearing and photography was done in clove oil and Purell® sanitizer.

TAXONOMY

Family Thelyphonidae Lucas, 1835

Subfamily Hypoctoninae Pocock, 1899

Genus Etienneus Heurtault, 1984

Etienneus Heurtault, 1984: 115–123, figs. 1–11.

Type Species

Hypoctonus africanus Hentschel, 1899, by original designation.

Diagnosis

Etienneus differs from all other whip scorpions on the basis of the following combination of characters. Carapace without carina between median and lateral ocelli; median ocelli not separated by superciliary carina; three pairs of lateral ocelli. Leg I, tarsomere IX (♀) terminating in dorsally curved, subconical projection; IV, tibia with single ventrodistal spur. Tergites I–IV divided by median longitudinal suture; V–VII (♂) or V–IX (♀) partially suturiform; XII (anal) with pair of large, oval, laterally compressed ommatoids. Sternum divided by median longitudinal suture. The median longitudinal suture of the sternum and dorsally curved, subconical projection of leg I, tarsomere IX (♀) appear to be autapomorphic for Etienneus.

Distribution

Etienneus is endemic to West Africa (fig. 3) and has thus far been recorded from the Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, and Senegal. No records are known from north of the Gambia River. The record from Guinea-Bissau provided below is the first from this country. We suspect that Etienneus may also occur in western Mali, where the habitat is very similar, with rolling hills and forest patches, and perhaps also to the south of Guinea, in Sierra Leone and Liberia.

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899)

Figures 1Figure 2Figure 4Figure 5Figure 6Figure 7Figure 8Figure 910; table 1

Figure 4

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), ♀ (AMNH), dextral chelicera. A. Ental aspect. B. Ectal aspect. Scale bar  =  1 mm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f04.gif

Figure 5

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), ♀ (AMNH). A. Carapace, dorsal aspect. B. Sternum, ventral aspect, showing median longitudinal suture. C. Pygidium, dorsal aspect, showing ommatoids. Scale bars  =  1 mm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f05.gif

Figure 6

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), ♂ and ♀ (AMNH), pedipalps. A. ♂, dorsal aspect. B. ♂, ventral aspect. C. ♀, dorsal aspect. D. ♀, ventral aspect. Scale bars  =  2.5 mm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f06.gif

Figure 7

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), ♀ (AMNH), leg I. A. Basitarsus and telotarsus, lateral aspect, showing uniformally short setae along ventral surface. Scale bar  =  1 mm. B, C. Telotarsus, terminal segment, anterior aspect, showing curved, subconical projection. Scale bars  =  100 µm. D. Tibia, distal end, lateral aspect, showing relative positions of two trichobothria. Scale bar  =  100 µm. E. Tibial trichobothrium, dorsal aspect. Scale bar  =  50 µm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f07.gif

Figure 8

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), ♂ and ♀ (AMNH), sternites II–IV, showing genital opercula. A. ♂, ventral aspect. B. ♂, dissected and cleared, dorsal aspect. C. ♀, ventral aspect. D. ♀, dissected and cleared, dorsal aspect. Scale bars  =  1 mm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f08.gif

Figure 9

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), ♀ (AMNH), spermatheca and operculum showing the two seminal receptacles. Scale bar  =  1 mm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f09.gif

Figure 10

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), ♂ (AMNH), hemispermatophore. A. Ental aspect. B. Ectal aspect. Scale bar  =  1 mm.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f10.gif

Table 1

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899), selected measurements (mm) of seven specimens from Senegal (AMNH)

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-t01.gif

Hypoctonus africanus Hentschel, 1899: 430, 431; Werner, 1935: 479; Cooke and Shadab, 1973: 1–6, figs 1, 2, 7, 10; Rowland and Cooke, 1973: 65.

Labochirus africanus (Hentschel, 1899): Gravely, 1916: 64; Mello-Leitão, 1931: 21.

Hypoctonus clarki Cooke and Shadab, 1973: 1–3, 6–11, figs. 3, 4, 8, 12; Rowland and Cooke, 1973: 65 (synonymized by Heurtault, 1984: 122).

Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899): Heurtault, 1984: 115–122, figs. 1–11; Haupt and Song, 1996: 43; Harvey, 2002: 363, 2003: 61; Giupponi and Vasconcelos, 2008: 18.

Type Material

Hypoctonus africanus Hentschel, 1899: SENEGAL: 1843, E. Ehrmann, 4 ♀ syntypes (MZS). According to the original description, two of the syntypes were collected in Senegal and two in Algeria (erroneous). It is also unclear whether E. Ehrmann was the original collector. Hypoctonus clarki Cooke and Shadab, 1973: THE GAMBIA: Western Division: Yundum [13°24′N 16°42′W], 1.ix.1956, C.R. Wallace, holotype ♂ (BMNH), 1951, M.H. Roth, 2 ♂ paratypes (BMNH).

Diagnosis

As for genus.

Description

The following description is based on 2 ♂ and 6 ♀ deposited in the AMNH (figs. 1, 2, 4Figure 5Figure 6Figure 7Figure 8Figure 910; table 1).

Total length: Maximum adult length, measured from anterior margin of carapace to posterior edge of pygidium (segment XII), 30.42 mm (♂), 35.35 mm (♀) (table 1).

Color: Carapace and tergites, dorsal surfaces, brown to dark reddish brown (figs. 1, 2). Sternites I–VII, ventral surfaces, orange-brown, lateral edges, brown; VIII, surfaces, uniformly brown. Pygidium, dorsal and ventral surfaces, reddish brown. Flagellum, dorsal, lateral and ventral surfaces, reddish brown, covered with reddish macrosetae. Pedipalp trochanter, femur, patella and tibia, dorsal and ventral surfaces, reddish brown; internal surfaces with reddish macrosetae. Pedipalp basitarsus, dorsal and ventral surfaces, dark brown proximally, black distally. Leg I, segments, reddish brown; II–IV, coxa and trochanter, orange-brown, other segments reddish brown.

Chelicerae: Movable finger longer than fixed finger, hinged along dorsal edge, with dense brush of reddish macrosetae on ental and ectal surfaces (fig. 4); manus with fewer, anteriorly directed, short, stout macrosetae on internal and external surfaces; fixed finger with short tooth basally. Chelicera of female larger than male.

Prosoma: Carapace, dorsal surface, finely and densely granular, granulation coarser below and immediately posterior to lateral ocelli (fig. 5A); posterior fovea obsolete; epistoma present; without carina between median and lateral ocelli; median ocular tubercle situated 1.12 mm from anterior carapace margin (table 1), distance between ocelli 0.78 times ocular diameter; lateral ocelli, anterior ocellus nearly twice diameter of median and posterior ocelli. Sternum with median longitudinal suture (fig. 5B).

Pedipalps: Surfaces very smooth, shiny, finely punctate, covered with short macrosetae internally (fig. 6). Coxa, external surface with vertical wrinkles, ventral surface smooth; apophysis with one tooth distally, covered in long macrosetae. Trochanter smooth, as long as (♀) or longer than (♂) wide; dorsointernal surface with five teeth, fourth from terminal twice length of remaining four (♀), or with only one pronounced tooth, others greatly reduced or granular (♂); internal surface with granules and reduced teeth (♀) or few, sparse granules (♂); ventrointernal surface with three teeth, proximal tooth greatly reduced. Femur one and a half times longer than (♀) to almost twice (♂) length of trochanter; external surface smooth; dorsal, internal, and ventral surfaces sparsely to densely granular; dorsointernal surface with (♀) or without (♂) tooth; ventrointernal surface with tooth. Patella almost as long as femur; dorsal and external surfaces smooth; external surface with median longitudinal indentation; dorsointernal surface with granules and with (♀) or without (♂) short tooth proximal to apophysis; internal and ventral surfaces sparsely granular; ventrointernal edge with one prominent (♀) or vestigial (♂) tooth distally. Patellar apophysis twice as long as (♀) or slightly longer than (♂) basal width; internal edge with serrate row of teeth; external edge with (♀) or without two teeth (♂). Tibia as long as femur, swollen (♂) or unmodified (♀); dorsal, external, and ventral surfaces smooth; internal surface smooth proximally, densely granular distally with macrosetae situated at base of most granules; dorsointernal edge with row of prominent (♀) or vestigial (♂) teeth; ventrointernal surface with one tooth distally. Fixed finger, dorsal edge smooth (♂) or with row of teeth (♀); ventral edge with serrate row of denticles. Basitarsus (movable finger), dorsal margin with serrate row of denticles; ventral margin with serrate row of teeth.

Legs: Leg I, basitarsus and telotarsus, tarsomeres II and III equal in length; IV slightly longer than V; V, VI, and VIII equal in length; VII shorter than VIII; IX longest, terminating in dorsally curved, subconical projection (♀) (fig. 7A–C); III–IX, ventral surfaces each covered with dense, uniformly short macrosetae (fig. 7A). Legs II–IV, basitarsus with two ventrodistal spurs. Leg IV, tibia with one ventrodistal spur. Leg I with two trichobothria (fig. 7D, E); II–IV with one; trichobothria situated distally on tibia.

Opisthosoma: Tergites, surfaces, finely granular; I–IV divided by median longitudinal suture; V–VII (♂) or V–IX (♀) partially suturiform; X not divided laterally by suture (pleuron); XII (anal) with pair of large, oval, laterally compressed ommatoids angled anteromedially in dorsal aspect (fig. 5C). Sternite II (genital) (fig. 8A, C) smooth, with two shallow lateral depressions (♀) or shallow folds along posterior edge (♂), posterior median margin lobate (♂) or sublinear (♀) (fig. 8A, C); III and IV (♂) or IV (♀) divided by median longitudinal suture; V partially suturiform (♀ only). Pygidial flagellum without flagellar organs; each segment with two to four very long macrosetae. Seminal receptacles spherical, directed posteriorly (fig. 9).

Hemispermatophore: Sperm package J-shaped with enlarged tip and reservoir; elongated jointlike stem connecting tip with hooked end (fig. 10).

Sexual dimorphism: The adult male and female differ in several characters. The spination and granulation of the pedipalps are more pronounced in the female; the pedipalp patellar apophysis is greatly reduced in the male; the dorsally curved, subconical projection of leg I, tarsomere IX of the female is absent in the male; the paired shallow lateral depressions on sternite II of the female are absent in the male; sternites II and III are separated medially by a subcutaneous sclerotized surface in the female but unmodified in the male (fig. 8B, D).

Additional Material

THE GAMBIA: Central River: Sapu Agricultural Station, 180 mi. up river [13°33′N 14°54′W], 1968, G.C.H. Smith, 1 ♀ (BMNH), 1 ♀ tritonymph (AMNH). GUINEA: Dr. Mallaud, 1 ♂ (MNHN). GUINEA-BISSAU: Bafata: Bambadinca, 19 km S, 11°53′03.9″N 14°50′08.5″W, 38 m, 30.vi–1.vii.2005, J. Huff and V. Vignoli, 1 ♀, 1 ♂ tetranymph, 1 ♂, 2 ♀ tritonymphs. SENEGAL: Région de Casamance: Djibelor [12°33′10″N 16°19′20″W], J. Etienne 15.vii.1982, 1 ♀ (MNHN); Djibelor, Centre de recherches agronomiques Zuiginchor [12°33′10″N 16°19′20″W], J. Etienne and Dr. Mallaud, 3.viii.1982, 11 ♂ (1 dissected) (MNHN). Région de Kolda: Sefa [12°47′09″N 15°33′02″W], A. Diop, 1 ♂ (MNHN), J. Etienne, 15.ii.1981, 4 ♀, 5 juv. (2 dissected) (MNHN). Région de Tambacounda: Kedougou [12°33′N 12°11′W], P. de Miré and D. Pluot-Sigwalt, x.1981, dans litière de forêt, 4 juv. (MNHN); Kedougou, 3 km W on road to Salemata, 12°33′10.6″N 12°13′39.4″W, 126 m, 4.vii.2005, J. Huff and V. Vignoli, 2 ♂, 5 ♀, 3 ♂ tetranymphs, 2 ♂, 1 ♀ tritonymphs, 4 ♂, 3 ♀ deutonymphs, 1 protonymph (AMNH).

Natural History

Newly collected specimens were taken from under rocks or logs in small forest fragments (fig. 11). The soil under the rocks or logs where specimens were found was more humid and less compacted than that under rocks or logs in direct sunlight, where specimens were not found. The behavior of E. africanus appears to be similar to that of other whip scorpion species that inhabit regions with distinct wet and dry seasons. During the dry season, individuals burrow to reach moisture and remain dormant below the surface until arrival of the first rains, whereupon they reemerge to the surface. In the summer of 2005, the rains in Guinea-Bissau were over a month late, and the substrate, even under logs and in the leaf litter, was extremely dry. No specimens were collected in five days of intense searching by several individuals in a forest where, according to local collectors and photographs, specimens are commonly found in the rainy season. Approximately 20 km south, however, in a forest bordered by a flood savanna, and thus considerably more humid than other forests in the region, five specimens were located under rocks and logs in approximately four hours of searching (fig. 11A). During this period, Senegal experienced heavy rains. One day after returning to Senegal from Guinea-Bissau, 21 specimens, including adults and juveniles, were collected under rocks in just two hours, in a small, humid patch of forest (fig. 11B). The forest in which these specimens were collected was only about 100 m2 in area, and surrounded by dry grassland with no tree canopy, suggesting that E. africanus was concentrated in the forest because it was the only suitable habitat in the immediate area.

Figure 11

Subtropical forest habitat of Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899). A. Guinea-Bissau: 19 km S of Bambadinca. B. Senegal: 3 km W of Kedougou on road to Salemata.

i0003-0082-3658-1-1-f11.gif

DISCUSSION

Some previous authors suggested that no indigenous whip scorpions exist in Africa, and that E. africanus was probably introduced to the Gambia region, 130–150 years ago, in shipments of agricultural material from Burma (Myanmar) or Thailand (Millot, 1949; Cooke and Shadab, 1973). Our observations refute these hypotheses. Besides the fact that 150 years would be insufficient time to allow the species to achieve its present distribution in four West African countries, morphology suggests that it is more closely related to the whip scorpions of the New World than it is to those of Asia.

Although placed in the Asian genera Hypoctonus and Labochirus by previous workers (Hentschel, 1899; Gravely, 1916; Werner, 1935; Cooke and Shadab, 1973; Rowland and Cooke, 1973) for reasons discussed above, Etienneus is readily distinguished from both of them on the basis of several characters. The pedipalp patellar apophysis of the male is greatly modified and enlarged, relative to that of the female, in Hypoctonus and Labochirus, as is also the case in the Asian genus Typopeltis Pocock, 1894. In Etienneus, however, the pedipalp patellar apophysis of the male is greatly reduced, relative to that of the female. The genital operculum of female Etienneus is not markedly sexually dimorphic, unlike that of Hypoctonus and Labochirus, in which sternite II of the female is lobate, heavily sclerotized, and flattened medially. Etienneus may be further distinguished from Labochirus by the absence of an accessory tooth on the internal edge of the pedipalp coxal apophysis.

Etienneus appears to be more closely related to the New World genera, Thelyphonellus and Ravilops, than to the above-mentioned Asian genera. Etienneus shares the following characters with Thelyphonellus and Ravilops: the male pedipalp patellar apophysis is unmodified; the genital operculum is not markedly sexually dimorphic; the carapace is narrow and elongated.

The hypothesis that Etienneus might be more closely related phylogenetically to the hypoctonine genera of the New World than to those of the Old World was first proposed by Heurtault (1984). Rowland and Cooke (1973) had earlier suggested that the sole New World hypoctonine species known at the time, Thelyphonellus amazonicus (Butler, 1872), might also be an introduction from Southeast Asia. This has since been refuted, however, by the discovery of additional hypoctonine species in the New World, including Thelyphonellus ruschii Weygoldt, 1979, from Guyana, Thelyphonellus vanegasae Giupponi and Vasconcelos, 2008, from Colombia, Ravilops wetherbeei (Armas, 2002) from the Dominican Republic, and two undescribed hypoctonine taxa from Surinam and Venezuela (Rowland, 2002; Giupponi and Vasconcelos, 2008; J. Huff, unpublished data).

Heurtault's (1984) hypothesis of a Gondwana connection between the whip scorpions of Africa and the Neotropics is plausible, given the many biogeographical connections between these areas. Among arachnids, for example, the order Ricinulei Thorell, 1876, the pseudoscorpion genus Pseudochthonius Balzan, 1892, and the scorpion genera, Ananteris Thorell, 1891 and Opisthacanthus Peters, 1861 (subgenus Opisthacanthus) are restricted to tropical western and central Africa and the New World (Newlands, 1973; Francke, 1974; Lourenço, 1985, 1987, 1993; Harvey, 1996, 2003; Prendini, 2005).

In addition to confirming Heurtault's (1984) hypothesis of a phylogenetic relationship between the hypoctonine whip scorpions of Africa and the New World, our observations support the creation of a monotypic genus for the African species. Etienneus differs from Thelyphonellus and Ravilops, and indeed from all other whip scorpions, on the basis of two potential autapomorphies described here for the first time: the presence of a median longitudinal suture on the sternum and a dorsally curved, subconical projection of leg I, tarsomere IX in the female.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Valerio Vignoli, University of Siena, Italy, for participation in fieldwork; Mario Schuhmann, River Zoo Farm, Bambadinca, Guinea-Bissau, for assistance with logistics and the acquisition of permits to collect and export arachnids from Guinea-Bissau; driver Ibrahim for driving over 5000 km in Guinea-Bissau and Senegal and assistance with the acquisition of permits to collect and export arachnids from Senegal; Christine Rollard (MNHN) for assisting the second author to examine material in the collection; Randy Mercurio (AMNH) for scanning electron micrography; Jon Coddington (U.S. National Museum, Smithsonian Institution) for suggesting Purell® sanitizer for stabilizing small structures for photography; Nadine Dupérré (AMNH) for translating Heurtault's (1984) paper; Lauren Esposito (AMNH) for producing the map; Steve Thurston (AMNH) for assistance with preparing the plates; Jessica Ware for suggestions on the manuscript and translating Hentschel's (1899) paper, and Mark Harvey and Peter Weygoldt for critical review and constructive suggestions on a previous draft of the manuscript. The expedition to Guinea-Bissau and Senegal was funded by U.S. National Science Foundation grant EAR 0228699 to the second author.

REFERENCES

1.

L. Fde Armas and C. Víquez . 2007. Mastigoproctus liochirus Pocock, 1900, is a junior synonym of Mimoscorpius pugnator (Butler, 1872) (Arachnida: Thelyphonida). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 40:507–509. Google Scholar

2.

A. Ballesteros and O. F. Francke . 2006. Mastigoproctus lacandonensis, especie nueva de vinagrillo (Thelyphonida, Arachnida) de la selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico. In V. E. G. Estrada, J. Romero N, A. Equihua M, C. Luna L, and J. Rosas A . Entomologia Mexicana. Memorias del 41 Congreso Nacional Entomologia, Manzanillo, Colima, Mexico. Vol. 5, tomo 1:156–161. Google Scholar

3.

J. A. L. Cooke and M. U. Shadab . 1973. Whipscorpions (Arachnida: Thelyphonida) from Africa. American Museum Novitates 2526:1–11. Google Scholar

4.

T. Eisner, J. Meinwald, A. Monro, and R. Ghent . 1961. Defense mechanisms of arthropods – I. The composition and function of the spray of the whipscorpion Mastigoproctus giganteus (Lucas) (Arachnida: Pedipalpida). Journal of Insect Physiology 6:272–298. Google Scholar

5.

O. F. Francke B 1974. Nota sobre los géneros Opisthacanthus Peters y Nepabellus nom. nov. (Scorpionida, Scorpionidae) e informe sobre el hallagzo de O. lepturus en la Isla del Coco, Costa Rica. Brenesia 4:31–35. Google Scholar

6.

A. P. L. Giupponi and E. G. Vasconcelos . 2008. Nova espécie de Thelyphonellus Pocock, 1894 da Colombia (Arachnida: Thelyphonida: Thelyphonidae). Revista Ibérica de Aracnologia 16:17–22. Google Scholar

7.

F. H. Gravely 1916. The evolution and distribution of the Indo-Australian Thelyphonidae, with notes on the distinctive characters of various species. Records of the Indian Museum 12:59–85. Google Scholar

8.

M. S. Harvey 1996. The biogeography of Gondwanan pseudoscorpions (Arachnida). Revue Suisse de Zoologie, hors série 1:255–264. Google Scholar

9.

M. S. Harvey 2002. The neglected cousins: What do we know about the smaller arachnid orders? Journal of Arachnology 30:357–372. Google Scholar

10.

M. S. Harvey 2003. Catalogue of the smaller arachnid orders of the world: Amblypygi, Uropygi, Schizomida, Palpigradi, Ricinulei and Solifugae. Canberra CSIRO Publishing. Google Scholar

11.

M. S. Harvey 2007. The smaller arachnid orders: diversity, descriptions and distributions from Linnaeus to the present (1758 to 2007). In Z-Q. Zhang and W. A. Shear . Linnaeus tercentenary: progress in invertebrate taxonomy. Zootaxa 1668:363–380. Google Scholar

12.

J. Haupt 1996. Revision of East Asian whip scorpions (Arachnida Uropygi Thelyphonida). II. Thailand and adjacent areas. Arthropoda Selecta 5/3/4:53–65. Google Scholar

13.

J. Haupt 2004. A new species of whipscorpion from Laos (Arachnida: Uropygi: Thelyphonidae). Senckenbergiana Biologica 83/2:151–155. Google Scholar

14.

J. Haupt, G. Höhne, H. Schwarz, B. Chen, W. Zhao, and Y. Zhang . 1988. Chinese whip scorpions using 2-ketones in defense secretion (Arachnida: Uropygi). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 157:883–885. Google Scholar

15.

J. Haupt and F. Müller . 2004. New products of defense secretion in South East Asian whip scorpions (Arachnida: Uropygi: Thelyphonida). Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 59c:579–581. Google Scholar

16.

J. Haupt and D. Song . 1996. Revision of East Asian whip scorpions (Arachnida Uropygi Thelyphonida). I. China and Japan. Arthropoda Selecta 5/3/4:43–52. Google Scholar

17.

E. Hentschel 1899. Zur geographischen Verbreitung der Thelyphoniden. Zoologischer Anzeiger 22:429–431. Google Scholar

18.

J. Heurtault 1984. Identité d'Hypoctonus africanus Hentschel et d'Hypoctonus clarki Cooke et Shadab (Arachnides: Uropyges). Revue Arachnologique 5:115–123. Google Scholar

19.

H. Klingel 1963. Mating and maternal behaviour in Thelyphonus caudatus Linnaeus (Pedipalpi, Holopeltidia, Uropygi). Treubia 26:65–69. Google Scholar

20.

K. Kraepelin 1897. Revision der Uropygi Thor. (Thelyphonidae auct.). Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete der Naturwissenschaften herausgegeben vom Naturwissenschaftlichen Verein in Hamburg 15:1–58. Google Scholar

21.

K. Kraepelin 1899. Scorpiones und Pedipalpi. Das Tierreich 8:i–xviii. 1–265. Google Scholar

22.

W. R. Lourenço 1985. Le véritable statut des genres Ananteris Thorell, 1891 et Ananteroides Borelli, 1911 (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Annals of the Natal Museum 26/2:407–416. Google Scholar

23.

W. R. Lourenço 1987. Révision systématique des scorpions du genre Opisthacanthus (Scorpiones, Ischnuridae). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Zoologie, Biologie et Écologie Animale 9/4:887–931. Google Scholar

24.

W. R. Lourenço 1993. A review of the geographical distribution of the genus Ananteris Thorell (Scorpiones: Buthidae), with description of a new species. Revista de Biología Tropical 41/3:697–701. Google Scholar

25.

Cde Mello-Leitão 1931. Pedipalpos do Brasil e algumas notas sobre a Ordem. Arquivos do Museu Nacional Rio de Janeiro 33:7–72, 3 pl. Google Scholar

26.

J. Millot 1949. Ordres des Uropyges. In P. P. Grassé Traité de zoologie. Vol. 6. Paris Masson. 533–562. Google Scholar

27.

G. Newlands 1973. Zoogeographical factors involved in the trans-Atlantic dispersal pattern of the genus Opisthacanthus Peters (Arachnida; Scorpionidae). Annals of the Transvaal Museum 28/7:91–101. Google Scholar

28.

R. I. Pocock 1894. Notes on the Thelyphonidae contained in the collection of the British Museum. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (6) 14:120–134. Google Scholar

29.

R. I. Pocock 1900. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Arachnida. London Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar

30.

L. Prendini 2005. Scorpion diversity and distribution in southern Africa: pattern and process. In B. A. Huber, B. J. Sinclair, and K-H. Lampe . African biodiversity: molecules, organisms, ecosystems: proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tropical Biology, Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn. New York Springer. 25–68. Google Scholar

31.

J. M. Rowland 2002. Review of the South American whip scorpions (Thelyphonida: Arachnida). Amazoniana 17:187–204. Google Scholar

32.

J. M. Rowland and J. A. L. Cooke . 1973. Systematics of the arachnid order Uropygi ( =  Thelyphonida). Journal of Arachnology 1:55–71. Google Scholar

33.

J. O. Schmidt, F. R. Dani, G. R. Jones, and E. D. Morgan . 2000. Chemistry, ontogeny, and role of pygidial gland secretions of the vinegaroon Mastigoproctus giganteus (Arachnida: Uropygi). Journal of Insect Physiology 46:331–337. Google Scholar

34.

R. E. Snodgrass 1948. The feeding organs of Arachnida, including mites and ticks. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 110:26–31. Google Scholar

35.

C. Víquez and L. F. de Armas . 2005. Dos nuevos géneros de vinagrillos de Centroamérica y las Antillas (Arachnida: Thelyphonida). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 37:95–98. Google Scholar

36.

C. Víquez and L. F. de Armas . 2006. Un nuevo género y dos nuevas especies de vinagrillos centroamericanos (Arachnida: Thelyphonida). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 38:37–41. Google Scholar

37.

C. Víquez and L. F. de Armas . 2007. A new species of Mastigoproctus Pocock, 1894 (Thelyphonida: Thelyphonidae) from Venezuela. Zootaxa 1463:39–45. Google Scholar

38.

F. Werner 1935. Klasse: Arachnoidea, Spinnentiere. Pedipalpen. In H. G. Bronn Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. Vol. 5 (IV) (8) (3). Leipzig Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft. 317–490. Google Scholar

39.

P. Weygoldt 1970. Courtship behaviour and sperm transfer in the giant whip scorpion, Mastigoproctus giganteus (Lucas) (Uropygi, Thelyphonidae). Behaviour 36:1–8. Google Scholar

40.

P. Weygoldt 1971. Notes on the life history and reproductive biology of the giant whip scorpion, Mastigoproctus giganteus (Uropygi, Thelyphonidae) from Florida. Journal of Zoology (London) 164:137–147. Google Scholar

41.

P. Weygoldt 1972. Spermatophorenbau und Samenübertragung bei Uropygen (Mastigoproctus brasilianus C.L. Koch) und Amblypygen (Charinus brasilianus Weygoldt und Admetus pumilio C.L. Koch) (Chelicerata, Arachnida). Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 71:23–51. Google Scholar

42.

P. Weygoldt 1988. Sperm transfer and spermatophore morphology in the whip scorpion Thelyphonus linganus (Arachnida: Uropygi: Thelyphonidae). Journal of Zoology (London) 215:189–196. Google Scholar
Jeremy C. Huff and Lorenzo Prendini "On the African Whip Scorpion, Etienneus africanus (Hentschel, 1899) (Thelyphonida: Thelyphonidae), with a Redescription Based on New Material from Guinea-Bissau and Senegal," American Museum Novitates 2009(3658), 1-16, (28 August 2009). https://doi.org/10.1206/674.1
Published: 28 August 2009
KEYWORDS
biogeography
Chelicerata
Gondwana
Neotropics
systematics
taxonomy
West Africa
Back to Top