Myriopteris Fée is an early diverging lineage of cheilanthoid ferns (Pteridaceae) that contains approximately 47 species encompassed within three major clades—all of which, until recently, were circumscribed in the large, polyphyletic genus, Cheilanthes Sw. (Grusz and Windham, 2013; Grusz et al., 2014). The covillei clade is the largest subclade in the recently resurrected genus Myriopteris, within which M. lindheimeri (Hook.) J. Sm. resides (Grusz et al., 2014). Myriopteris lindheimeri itself comprises a number of relatively widespread, apomictic triploid lineages (n = 2n = 90 chromosomes; Windham and Yatskievych, 2003) derived from a comparatively rare, sexual diploid cytotype through intraspecific whole genome duplication, i.e., autopolyploidy (Grusz et al., 2009). Its distribution spans the southwestern United States (Arizona, New Mexico, Texas) and adjacent Mexico (Windham and Rabe, 1993).
Here, we use 454 next-generation sequencing to develop microsatellite markers for M. lindheimeri. Like M. lindheimeri, many members of the covillei clade are also apomictic polyploids or, alternatively, sexual diploids that are involved in the formation of downstream polyploid taxa of hybrid origin (Grusz et al., 2009). For this reason, we tested our newly developed markers for cross-amplification in diploid and polyploid taxa spanning the covillei clade, including: M. aurea (Poir.) Grusz & Windham (apomictic triploid), M. covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve (sexual diploid), M. fendleri (Hook.) E. Fourn. (sexual diploid), and M. rufa Fée (apomictic triploid) (Windham and Rabe, 1993; Windham and Yatskievych, 2003; Grusz and Windham, 2013; Grusz et al., 2014).
METHODS AND RESULTS
Genomic DNA of a single individual of diploid M. lindheimeri (voucher: Schuettpelz 450 [DUKE], collected from the Tonto National Forest, Pinal Co., Arizona, USA) was extracted from silica gel—dried material using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit following the manufacturer's protocol (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA). Genomic DNA was run on two lanes (1/4 plate = 24 wells) using the Roche 454 GS-FLX Titanium sequencing platform (454 Life Sciences, a Roche Company, Branford, Connecticut, USA) at the Duke University Center for Genomic and Computational Biology sequencing facility. The 454 run generated 234,428 sequence reads with a median length of 403 bp. Raw data were scanned for di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide perfect microsatellite repeats using MSATCOMMANDER version 0.8.2 (Faircloth, 2008). Of the 234,428 sequence reads searched, 25,295 sequences contained a total of 33,955 repeats. Given the surplus of repeat regions, we focused our efforts on a subset of nonplastid regions (determined by BLASTN against the M. lindheimeri chloroplast genome; Wolf et al., 2011) containing di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats with sufficient flanking sequence in which to develop primers (Chakraborty et al., 1997). A total of 159 unlabeled primer pairs were designed in Primer3, using default settings, implemented within MSATCOMMANDER (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999; Faircloth, 2008).
Each microsatellite region (159 in total) was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of the individual for which the 454 sequencing was completed (Schuettpelz 450). This amplification followed Schuettpelz and Pryer (2007), except that the annealing temperature was set to 60°C to prevent nonspecific primer binding. Amplicons were visualized on a 1% agarose gel using SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA), run for 35 min at 75 V. Amplifications that produced a single strong band were purified and sequenced also following the protocol of Schuettpelz and Pryer (2007). Clean sequence fragments (assumed to represent ca. single-copy markers) were assembled in Sequencher 4.8 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) and examined to confirm the presence of the anticipated microsatellite repeat. For regions with the repeat, new forward primers were designed with a CAG nucleotide tag (5′-CAGTCGGGCGTCATCA-3′) incorporated at the 5′ end of the primer sequence—to be used in combination with a complementary, fluorescently labeled nucleotide tag in subsequent genotyping reactions (Schuelke, 2000).
Table 1.
Characteristics of 21 microsatellite markers developed in Myriopteris lindheimeri.a
Table 2.
Amplification of microsatellite markers in taxa closely related to Myriopteris lindheimeri, together with their corresponding fragment lengths.a,b
Table 3.
Population summary for nine highly polymorphic, newly developed microsatellite loci surveyed across three populations of Myriopteris lindheimeri.a
Genotyping reactions used 10× PCR buffer IV containing MgCl2 (ABgene, Epsom, United Kingdom) combined with 2.4 mM dNTPs, 100 µg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5 U/µL Taq polymerase, 2 µM reverse primer, 10 µM CAG-tagged forward primer, 10 µM fluorescently labeled CAG complementary primer, plus 1 µL of DNA template for a 12-µL reaction. Each reaction entailed an initial denaturation step (94°C for 7 min), followed by 10 denaturation, annealing, and elongation cycles (94°C for 30 s, 62°C [−1°C per cycle] for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s, respectively) and 27 additional denaturation, annealing, and elongation cycles (94°C for 30 s, 51°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s, respectively) with a final elongation step (72°C for 12 min). Fragment analyses were run using a GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard on a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The resulting data were visualized using GeneMarker 2.2.0 (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA). Of the 159 primer pairs tested, 138 failed to amplify, amplified multiple bands, or produced poor fragment peaks (due to stutter, multiple peaks, or inconsistent amplification) and were discarded, leaving 21 markers that amplified well in M. lindheimeri.
To determine the utility of these 21 markers, we surveyed each new locus across multiple individuals spanning the northern range of M. lindheimeri (Table 1; Appendix 1). Fragment analysis revealed alleles ranging from 175– 453 bp in length; of the 21 markers assessed, 14 were heterozygous within or polymorphic across individuals of M. lindheimeri (number of alleles ranging from two to five; Table 1), and eight amplified in one or more closely related taxa (Table 2). Population-level diversity measures were assessed for three populations of M. lindheimeri in Arizona, USA: Carr Canyon (n = 8 individuals; 31.4394°N, 110.2861°W), Jacobson Canyon (n = 16 individuals; 32.6834°N, 109.7632°W), and Paradise (n = 12 individuals; 31.9590°N, 109.2116°W) (Table 3). Individuals from each population were genotyped for a subset of our newly developed, polymorphic microsatellite loci (nine loci total) using a multiplex approach: for each individual, all nine loci were amplified individually and the resulting fluorescently labeled amplicons were pooled in two separate multiplex reactions (Table 1). The resulting fragment data were used to calculate percentage of polymorphic loci (P), heterozygote frequency over all loci (Het), and genotypic diversity (G = 1 − Σgi2, where gi is the frequency of the ith genotype; Table 4); all measures were calculated manually using Microsoft Excel version 14.4.8 (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA). Samples from Carr Canyon and Jacobson Canyon were polymorphic at 55.6% of loci surveyed and each had relatively low genotypic diversity (0.25); however, Jacobson Canyon had a higher heterozygote frequency compared to Carr Canyon (0.43 vs. 0.24, respectively). Samples surveyed from Paradise were polymorphic at 77.8% of loci; and, while heterozygote frequency over all loci was relatively low (0.28), genotypic diversity was high (0.52), indicating a relative abundance of unique genotypes compared to other populations sampled.
Table 4.
Population-level genetic diversity statistics for nine highly variable microsatellite loci for three populations of Myriopteris lindheimeri.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we developed 14 polymorphic microsatellite loci for M. lindheimeri, eight of which amplify well in one or more congeneric species. Myriopteris is notorious for its high incidence of polyploidy, hybridization, and apomixis (Windham et al., 2009; Grusz et al., 2014), yet little is known about the influence of these processes on population dynamics in the genus (or in ferns in general). Given that polyploidy, hybridization, and apomixis are intimately linked to the evolution of many fern lineages, it is our hope that by refining our understanding of these processes in Myriopteris, we will improve our understanding of these phenomena in ferns as a whole.
LITERATURE CITED
Appendices
Appendix 1. Myriopteris lindheimeri vouchers used to survey allelic variation for 21 newly designed microsatellite loci (Table 1). COUNTRY: State—Fern DNA Database no. ( https://fernlab.biology.duke.edu): Collector no.; specific locality; voucher herbarium; SSR loci (0 = not amplified. 1 = amplified). For each individual, SSR loci are listed in the following order: F28JE, F9ROB, FJIEP, FYM3K, GCG5L, HAWY1, HDLR7, HGGWA, HL9PJ, HO454, HY3SM, IAO3P, IMEWX, IQLI0, IVYHJ, J0629, JDYSK, JGM27, JJUWV, JS90I, JW1YD. For example, “111111111111111111111” indicates data from a given individual contributed to the allele summary for all loci.
Notes
[1] The authors thank M. H. Noor and M. D. Windham for initial encouragement of this project, and W. Booth and M. Rusham for contributing expertise. Funding was provided by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Shirley and Alan Graham Graduate Student Research Award, a Duke University Department of Biology Grant-in-Aid, and a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research awarded to A.L.G., as well as a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant awarded to K.M.P. and A.L.G. (DEB-1110767).