Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 May 2011 Nitrogen Inputs by Associative Cyanobacteria across a Low Arctic Tundra Landscape
Katherine J. Stewart, Darwyn Coxson, Paul Grogan
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Available soil N is a key factor limiting plant productivity in most low arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Atmospheric N2-fixation by cyanobacteria is often the primary source of newly fixed N in these nutrient-poor environments. We examined temporal and spatial variation in N2-fixation by the principal cyanobacterial associations (biological soil crusts, Sphagnum spp. associations, and Stereocaulon paschale) in a wide range of ecosystems within a Canadian low arctic tundra landscape, and estimated N input via N2-fixation over the growing season using a microclimatically driven model. Moisture and temperature were the main environmental factors influencing N2-fixation. In general, N2-fixation rates were largest at the height of the growing season, although each N2-fixing association had distinct seasonal patterns due to ecosystem differences in microclimatic conditions. Ecosystem types differed strongly in N2-fixation rates with the highest N input (10.89 kg ha−1 yr−1) occurring in low-lying Wet Sedge Meadow and the lowest N input (0.73 kg ha−1 yr−1) in Xerophytic Herb Tundra on upper esker slopes. Total growing season (3 June–13 September) N2-fixation input from measured components across a carefully mapped landscape study area (26.7 km2) was estimated at 0.68 kg ha−1 yr−1, which is approximately twice the estimated average N input via wet deposition. Although biological N2-fixation input rates were small compared to internal soil N cycling rates, our data suggest that cyanobacterial associations may play an important role in determining patterns of plant productivity across low arctic tundra landscapes.

Introduction

Plant productivity in many arctic regions is constrained both by low soil temperature and low soil moisture content, but during the growing season soil nitrogen (N) is believed to be the primary factor limiting plant growth (Shaver and Chapin, 1980; Nadelhoffer et al., 1992; Liengen and Olsen, 1997a; Zielke et al., 2005). Atmospheric N2-fixation is considered the primary source of new N input to arctic terrestrial ecosystems; however, there are relatively few estimates of annual N inputs via N2-fixation (Alexander and Schell, 1973; Schell and Alexander, 1973; Bazely and Jefferies, 1989; Gunther, 1989; Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992; Hobara et al., 2006). For example, most estimates have failed to simultaneously consider all N2-fixing associations present, the representation of different N2-fixers within vegetation types or ecosystem types and the extent of ecosystem types within a given landscape.

New N inputs in nutrient-poor arctic ecosystems are primarily due to atmospheric N2-fixation by cyanobacteria (Alexander, 1974; Granhall and Lid-Torsvik, 1975; Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992; Liengen, 1999a; Solheim et al., 2006). Cyanobacteria occur in symbiotic associations with a wide variety of lichens, and as a free-living component of biological soil crusts (BSCs), which are communities composed of bacteria, cyanobacteria, algae, mosses, liverworts, fungi, and lichens. Facultative symbioses between cyanobacteria and mosses, liverworts, and hornworts are also common (Smith, 1984; Granhall and Selander, 1973; Rai et al., 2000; Turetsky, 2003).

Biological N2-fixation inputs are determined by the abundance and diversity of these N2-fixing associations as well as several environmental factors that control their activity. For example, seasonal variation in moisture, temperature, and light lead to large temporal variability in N2-fixation rates (Basilier and Granhall, 1978; Chapin et al., 1991; Dickson, 2000; Solheim et al., 2006). Furthermore, biological N2-fixation inputs may be expected to vary greatly among and within vegetation-types due to spatial heterogeneities in environmental and microclimatic conditions. Accordingly, landscape-level estimates of biological N2-fixation inputs must account for topographical variation since it is the primary determinant of soil moisture patterns and therefore of the distribution of vegetation types (Walker, 2000) and their cyanobacterial associations.

A landscape-level understanding of the temporal and spatial variation in N2-fixation inputs, as well as the environmental controls on N2-fixation, has broad significance not just in understanding N cycling in low arctic ecosystems, but also in predicting the potential impacts of future climatic changes (Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992). Warmer temperatures and changes in moisture availability may directly affect N2-fixation rates, but may also indirectly affect N inputs by altering the distribution of vegetation types and their particular cyanobacterial associations across the landscape. For example, enhanced shrub growth associated with climate warming trends in the low Arctic (Goetz et al., 2005; Sturm et al., 2001) may shade out lichens and possibly other N2-fixing associations in mesic tundra. Evaluation of the relative importance of these potential effects requires a spatially explicit understanding of individual ecosystem N2-fixation rates across the landscape.

The objectives of this study were to: (a) evaluate temporal and spatial variation in N2-fixation by associative cyanobacteria in various ecosystem types within a typical low arctic tundra landscape; and (b) estimate N input via N2-fixation over the growing season using microclimatically driven models based on incubation studies of the ecophysiological responses of individual N2-fixing associations to moisture, temperature, and light conditions over the growing season.

Materials and Methods

STUDY SITE

The study area was located in a low arctic tundra region at the Tundra Ecosystem Research Station, Daring Lake, Northwest Territories (64°52′N, 111°35′W, 414–470 m a.s.l.) (Fig. 1), approximately 90 km northeast of the northern limit of continuous trees within the physiographic zone of the Bear–Slave Upland of the Canadian Shield (Obst, 2008). Landscape features include eskers, boulder fields, exposed bedrock, upland and lowland tundra, wetlands, and various sizes of lakes, ponds, and streams. Continuous permafrost is present at the site with a soil active layer ranging from 0.3 to 2 m (Obst, 2008).

FIGURE 1

Location of the study site at Daring Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada (64°52′N, 111°35′W) (adapted from  http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/_live/pages/wpPages/Tundra_Ecosystem_Research_Station.aspx).

i1523-0430-43-2-267-f01.tif

Mean monthly air temperature is −30 °C in January and +13 °C in July (INAC, 2007; Obst, 2008). Mean monthly precipitation from May to October is 25 mm as rain. Snow accumulation is highly variable across the landscape, but usually ranges from 15 to 60 cm in low-lying heath vegetation by mid to late May (1996–2008; Bob Reid, INAC, unpublished data). Snowmelt usually starts after mid-May ending in early June, with some snow beds persisting on slopes until late June or early July. The plant growing season generally begins in late May or early June and ends by late August (Nobrega and Grogan, 2008; Lafleur and Humphreys, 2008).

The landscape study area encompasses the East Daring Lake Basin (26.7 km2). Ecosystem mapping and distribution of landscape units for the landscape study area follows Obst (2008). A 1-m resolution IKONOS image provided detailed information on 15 classes (plus unclassified areas) of land covers, vegetation communities, and ecosystem types present in the study area (Obst, 2008). We focused our study on the dominant ecosystem types that together occupy a total of 68% of the study area: Heath-Lichen/Heath-Mat Tundra (42%), Birch Hummock (13%), Wet Sedge Meadow (8%), and Xerophytic Herb Tundra (5%). The distribution of these four ecosystem types is largely driven by esker topography (Table 1).

TABLE 1

The principal topographic position, substrate, drainage, and characteristic plant species for each ecosystem type included in the landscape study at Daring Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada (follows Obst, 2008).

i1523-0430-43-2-267-t01.tif

N2-FIXING ASSOCIATIONS

Four predominant cyanobacterial associations were identified within the selected landscape study area at Daring Lake: Biological Soil Crusts (BSCs) in hollows, BSCs on mineral soil mounds, Sphagnum spp., and Stereocaulon paschale sensu lato. Each cyanobacterial association was found in all of the ecosystem types included in the landscape study; however, the abundance of each association varied between ecosystem types. Vascular plant species with N2-fixing associations, such as Oxytropis nigrescens (Pall.) Fisch. ex DC., and Alnus crispa (Aiton) Pursh., do occur in the area but are rare (Obst, 2008).

Two major BSC communities were found in association with hummock-hollow microtopography. Hollow BSCs were found mainly in the depressions between hummocks and were composed of liverworts growing in dense mats generally underlain by varying depths of organic matter. The main components of Hollow BSCs were Anastrophyllum minutum Schreb. and Cephalloziella spp. including C. rubella (Nees) Warnst. and C. hampeana complex (O. Lee, unpublished data). Cyanobacteria on Hollow BSCs were mostly the filamentous and heterocystous cyanobacterium Stigonema cf. turfaceum (Berk.) Cooke (B. Büdel, unpublished data). However, on some samples filamentous and heterocystous Tolypothrix sp. and the filamentous, non-heterocystous Schizothrix cf. cuspidata W. et G.S. West, were found growing in between the leafy liverworts and on the Stigonema filaments. Stigonema minutum (C. Agardh) Hass. and Calothrix sp. were also found on Hollow BSC samples. Hummock BSCs were cohesive, well-developed crusts (1–2 cm thick) found on cryoturbated mineral soil mounds. Small, less well-developed patches of Hummock BSCs also occurred in sandy well-drained areas on ridge tops. Hummock BSCs were complex communities made up of lichens, mosses, and liverworts. Lichen species included Placynthiella uliginosa Schrader., Bryocaulon divergens Ach., Bryoria tenuis (E. Dahl) Brodo & D. Hawksw., Cladonia spp., Japewia tornoensis Nyl., Ochrolechia frigida Sw., and Solorina crocea L. (C. Bjork, unpublished data). Moss species (Funaria sp., Pohlia sp., Ditrichum sp., and Polytricum piliferum Hedwig.) and liverwort species (Cephalozia sp., Cephaloziella sp., Anastrophyllum sp., Anthelia sp., Lophozia sp., and Lophozia incise Schrad.) were also key components of these diverse communities. Stiognema turfaceum, S. minutum, and S. hormoides (Kutz.) Born. & Flah. dominated Hummock BSCs; however, Gloeocapsa decorticans A. Braun., G. novacekii (Komárek & Anagnotid), S. cuspidata, Anabaena sp., and Chroococcidiopsis sp. were also present.

Sphagnum spp. were the dominant ground cover in Wet Sedge Meadows and were found scattered in damp depressions throughout the landscape. The majority of Sphagnum spp. samples were composed of Sphagnum aongstroemii C. Hartm. and S. subsecundum complex, with occasional fine strands of S. balticum (Russ.) C. Jens. (O. Lee, unpublished data). In addition, other moss (Drepanocladus aduncus (Hedw.) Warnst.) and liverwort (Gymnocolea inflate Huds.) species were found intermingled within Sphagnum spp. samples. The cyanobacteria G. decorticans was found in association with Sphagnum spp. samples (B. Büdel, unpublished data).

Stereocaulon paschale was predominantly found in small continuous mats on high/mid-slope positions, often in areas where late-lying snow patches occurred. Patchy distribution of S. paschale also occurred on well-drained ridge tops and in hummock-hollow complexes.

N2-FIXATION RATES

Measurements of N2-fixation were made using acetylene reduction assays (Stewart et al., 1967). Acetylene gas (C2H2) was generated on-site from CaC2 and water, with incubations injected with 10% (v/v) acetylene. Ethylene concentrations were measured in the field with a portable gas chromatograph (SRI 8610A, Wennick Scientific Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) fitted with a Porapak column (Alltech Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada) and a flame ionization detector. A Stand-Alone Hydrogen Generator (SRI H2-50, Alltech Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada) provided hydrogen as the carrier gas, which was held at a constant pressure of 26 psi. Column temperature was held at 65 °C. The gas chromatograph was calibrated for each incubation with ethylene (BOC Canada Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; C2H4, 98%+) that was kept at the same temperature as incubation gas samples.

Cores of Hollow BSCs (n  =  12), Hummock BSCs (n  =  12), and S. paschale (n  =  12) were randomly sampled for each incubation from an area of ∼5 km2 that was representative of the larger landscape study area. Samples were taken from multiple positions on both north- and south-facing slopes of the main east-west-oriented esker. BSC samples were trimmed to an area of 19 cm2 and 0.75 cm depth such that each sample had a thin underlying soil substrate. Stereocaulon paschale was trimmed to an area of 19 cm2 and 2 cm depth, but no underlying soil substrate was included. Samples were enclosed in 250 mL glass canning jars with modified lids containing a rubber septum. The mean headspace of ARA incubations was 235.75 mL (250 mL jar volume minus 14.25 mL sample) for Hollow and Hummock BSCs and 212 mL for S. paschale (250 mL jar volume minus 38 mL sample). Sphagnum spp. cores (n  =  12) were sampled from an area of ∼0.5 km2 within the Wet Sedge Meadow ecosystem type only. Samples were trimmed to an area of 56 cm2 and 6 cm depth and included both live (green) and underlying decaying stems. Sphagnum spp. samples were incubated in 1 L canning jars with modified lids containing rubber septa and had a mean headspace of 664 mL (1000 mL jar volume minus 336 mL sample). All Sphagnum spp. jars were incubated in situ in the Wet Sedge Meadow with the glass bottom facing up and the Sphagnum spp. sample level with the surrounding vegetation. For each set of incubations one sample for each N2-fixing association was used as a control, which served as both a temperature control and a blank not injected with acetylene. Control samples did not show any natural evolution of ethylene. Contamination of generated acetylene with ethylene was monitored and corrections were made for each set of incubations, as required.

Daytime ARA incubations occurred between 10:00 and 16:00 hr (6 hours) and nighttime ARA incubations between 21:00 and 7:00 hr (10 hours). A pilot study conducted in 2007 indicated net respiration in both Hollow BSCs (108 µL L−1 CO2/hr) and Hummock BSCs (162 µL L−1 CO2/hr) under average light conditions, suggesting that CO2 limitation was unlikely to limit N2-fixation despite longer incubation periods. However, we injected the S. paschale incubations with 1% (v/v) CO2 after 3 hours for daytime incubations and after 1 hour for night-time incubations because the lichen samples lacked an underlying soil substrate to provide a CO2 source.

Destructive sampling was used for each incubation, with new samples of each cyanobacterial association (n  =  12) collected per incubation. Nine consecutive sets of in situ incubations under ambient field conditions were conducted over a 6 day period (5 nighttime and 4 daytime) in each growing season month for each N2-fixing association, with the exception of Sphagnum spp. in 2007. Incubations for Hollow BSCs and Hummock BSCs were conducted on 19–24 June, 6–11 July, and 9–13 August in 2007; and on 12–17 June, 1–6 July, and 5–10 August in 2008. Sphagnum spp. were incubated for a 24 hr period over 5 consecutive days on 25–29 June, 9–13 July, and 17–22 August in 2007 due to logistical constraints. In 2008, Sphagnum spp. were incubated in the same manner as other N2-fixing associations on 18–23 June, 7–12 July, and 17–22 August. Sphagnum spp. N2-fixation rates were not significantly different between 2007 and 2008; therefore, the difference in incubation length likely had little influence on the overall rate estimation. Stereocaulon paschale was incubated only in 2008 on 4–9 June, 7–12 July, and 11–16 August. Over the 2007–2008 growing seasons a total of 571 (Hollow BSCs), 572 (Hummock BSCs), 794 (Sphagnum spp.), and 294 (S. paschale) individual samples were incubated in situ under ambient field conditions.

With the exception of Sphagnum spp., all in situ samples were incubated outdoors near the research station laboratory under ambient field conditions. Incubation chambers were placed in water baths and bath temperature was altered to ensure that incubation temperatures reflected ambient conditions. Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR), air temperature, incubation temperature, and ambient temperature of Hollow BSCs, Hummock BSCs, and S. paschale were monitored every 30 minutes during daytime ARA incubations. On average, the surface temperature of incubation samples were within 1.5 °C of the surface temperature of the respective N2-fixing associations under ambient conditions. Heating of incubation chambers via solar radiation was not a concern for nighttime incubations where microclimate was monitored for the first and last hour only. Moisture of Hollow BSCs, Hummock BSCs, and S. paschale were determined both pre- and post-incubation to ensure that drying of specimens did not occur during the incubation period. Average loss of moisture during incubations was less than <1.8% for all N2-fixing associations. Following incubation, all samples were weighed, air dried, and then re-weighed to determine moisture content. Moisture content of samples over the growing season was later used for modeling N2-fixation potential.

In addition to in situ incubations under ambient field conditions, N2-fixing associations were also incubated in situ under optimal environmental conditions (200 µmol PAR m−2 s−1, 20 °C) at the end of each set of incubations in June, July, and August 2007/2008. For each of our N2-fixing associations we likely had several different cyanobacterial species present with varying optimal operating environments; however, an optimal temperature of ∼20 °C has been demonstrated for several species/environments (Basilier and Granhall, 1978; Chapin et al., 1991; Liengen, 1999a), and light saturation was been demonstrated at ∼100 µmol PAR m−2 s−1 (Coxson and Kershaw, 1983a; Chapin et al., 1991). Samples (n  =  12) were treated in the same way as field incubations, with the exception of a 24 hr wetting pretreatment at optimal hydration levels.

N2-fixation rates for both in situ incubations under ambient and optimal conditions were calculated as micromoles of ethylene reduced per hour per m2 based upon the length of incubation and area of each sample (19 cm2 BSCs and S. paschale; 56 cm2 Sphagnum spp.). Conversion ratios determined for each N2-fixing association (see below) were used to convert ethylene reduced to N2 reduced. ARA values were corrected for differences in incubation jar volume, mean sample volume, and area. Different N2-fixing associations were allowed to vary in sample depth (i.e. 0.75 cm BSCs, 2 cm S. paschale, 6 cm Sphagnum spp.) to help ensure sampling units were kept intact and that N2-fixing surfaces were representative of the different associations under natural conditions.

15N-INCUBATIONS

Samples of each cyanobacterial association were collected from the Daring Lake landscape in August 2008 to determine conversion ratios for each of the N2-fixing associations following the methods of Liengen (1999b). Samples were kept cool (∼4 °C) and shipped to the lab at the University of Northern British Columbia. Prior to incubation samples were kept at optimal hydration in a growth chamber for 72 hours under a 17/7 hr light (200 µmol PAR m−2 s−1)/dark cycle with temperatures at 15 °C during light hours and 5 °C during dark hours. Cores for each N2-fixing association (n  =  8) were similar in area (19 cm2) and depth (0.75–2 cm) to those used for field incubations.

In order to achieve detection of 15N enrichment it was determined that 48 hr laboratory incubations (200 µmol PAR m−2 s−1, 20 °C) were required. Air (10% v/v) was replaced with 10% (v/v) 15N gas (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, U.S.A.; 15N2, 98%+). To reduce the potential for CO2 limitation due to the long incubation period, each chamber was injected with 5% (v/v) CO2. After the 48 hr incubation samples were immediately dried at 105 °C. Dry samples were ground in a ball mill and sent for 15N and total N analysis (Stable Isotope Facilities, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada). Control samples (n  =  8 for each N2-fixing association) treated in the same manner but incubated with C2H2 were used to determine the natural abundance of 15N and the acetylene reduction rate. The amount of N fixed was calculated using (Liengen, 1999b, p. 224):

i1523-0430-43-2-267-e01.gif
where Y (nmol N·gdw−1·h−1) are the amounts of N2 fixed during the experiment, atom% 15Nexcess is the difference between atom% 15Nsample and atom% 15Ncontrol, total N is the total amount of nitrogen in the sample (g·100 gdw−1), t is the incubation time, 28 is the molecular weight of N2 (g/mol), and %15Nair is the percentage of 15N out of the total amount of N gas in each incubation chamber. Conversion ratios varied among the different N2-fixing associations (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Mean monthly N2-fixation rates (µmol N m−2 hr−1) in incubations under field and optimized environmental conditions for each of the principal N2-fixing cyanobacterial associations in the low arctic tundra landscape near Daring Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada. Acetylene reduction conversion ratios based on optimal conditions are included for each N2-fixing association. Parentheses indicate standard errors. BSC  =  biological soil crust.

i1523-0430-43-2-267-t02.tif

ESTIMATION OF LANDSCAPE LEVEL N INPUTS

Microclimatic Monitoring

Hollow and Hummock BSC microclimatic conditions were monitored in several different hollow-hummock complexes within the study landscape in 2007 (Julian days 169–257) and 2008 (Julian days 154–235). PAR was measured with quantum sensors (n  =  2–3) (LI-190 Quantum Sensors, LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A.) installed at ground level in separate hummocks and hollows and connected to a multiplexer (AM416, Campbell Scientific Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada). Soil surface temperature was monitored with fine-wire copper constantan thermocouples (n  =  7–23) connected to a multiplexer (AM25T, Campbell Scientific Inc.). Impedance clips (n  =  4–19) were inserted at the surface of Hollow and Hummock BSCs to monitor moisture conditions (after Coxson, 1991). All multiplexers and impedance clips were connected to a datalogger (CR23X, Campbell Scientific Inc.) and hourly means recorded. Impedance measurements were calibrated in the lab by simultaneously monitoring clip values and gravimetric moisture of Hollow BSC and Hummock BSC samples from a saturated to desiccated state. Both Hollow BSC and Hummock BSC %moisture were best explained by exponential relationships with impedance clip values (f  =  25.55*exp (1.18*x), adjusted R2  =  0.65; and (f  =  exp (3.65*x), adjusted R2  =  0.75).

Sphagnum spp. temperature was monitored with a pair of copper constantan thermocouples installed at a depth of 2 cm. One thermocouple was connected to a multiplexer (AM25T, Campbell Scientific Inc.) and datalogger (21X, Campbell Scientific Inc.) recording hourly means in 2007/2008. The other thermocouple was connected to an additional datalogger (CR10X, Campbell Scientific Inc.) recording 4 hour mean temperatures in 2007/2008.

Modeling N2-Fixation Potential

Models of N2-fixation potential were determined for BSCs using N2-fixation rates and microclimatic data recorded in the in situ ambient incubations. The Sphagnum spp. N2-fixation model was based on N2-fixation rates under controlled laboratory conditions, and the S. paschale model was based on N2-fixation rates recorded during in situ ambient incubations and macroclimatic data recorded at a local Daring Lake weather station (∼500 m from the research station) (2007–2008; Bob Reid, INAC, unpublished data). Spearman correlations were determined between mean N2-fixation rate, mean light (PAR), mean incubation temperature, and mean % moisture for each incubation across all in situ ambient incubations (2007 and 2008) for Hollow (n  =  54) and Hummock BSCs (n  =  54). Temperature had the highest correlation with N2-fixation for both Hollow (r  =  0.78) and Hummock BSCs (r  =  0.64). Light and temperature had a high covariance for Hollow BSCs (r  =  0.84) and Hummock BSCs (r  =  0.81); therefore, only temperature and moisture were used in the models. Separate models were determined for high and low moisture conditions. High and low moisture classes were based on percent moisture values above (‘high’) and below (‘low’) the median % moisture detected for Hollow or Hummock BSCs incubated in the field over the growing season in 2007 and 2008.

Sphagnum spp. were sampled from the field site in early August 2009, kept cool (∼4 °C), and shipped to the lab at the University of Northern British Columbia. The samples were incubated under a range of laboratory conditions reflecting field conditions in 2007–2008 to determine the response of N2-fixation to temperature and light. Moisture was not included because >70% of Sphagnum spp. within the landscape occurred in Wet Sedge Meadows where moisture remains relatively high throughout the growing season and is likely not limiting. Sphagnum spp. N2-fixation rates were significantly correlated with temperature (r  =  0.62). N2-fixation rates under light conditions ranging from 0 to 1000 µmol PAR m−2 s−1 were not significantly different (ANOVA, Tukey post hoc, p  =  0.09); therefore, only temperature was included in the model.

Mean N2-fixation by S. paschale under in situ ambient incubations (n  =  27) was highly correlated with mean % moisture (r  =  0.92). Days since precipitation was used as the moisture variable for S. paschale since direct measurements of field moisture content were not possible. A considerable lag period often occurs following saturation of Stereocaulon mats from rainfall events before steady nitrogenase activity is recovered (Crittenden and Kershaw, 1978). Therefore, a 24 hour lag was incorporated into the days since precipitation variable. The 24 hours following a precipitation event (≥1 mm) was coded as 0 and every subsequent day without a precipitation event coded with an increasing value of 1. Days since precipitation was highly correlated with mean % moisture (r  =  −0.76) and with N2-fixation (r  =  −0.84).

The above models were used to estimate hourly N2-fixation rates for each association over a growing season based upon microclimate and macroclimatic monitoring in the study landscape. Hourly N2-fixation rates were summed to provide daily (Fig. 2) and seasonal totals (Table 4). We defined the start of the growing season as the first set of three or more consecutive days with no snow cover and mean air temperature above 0 °C, and the end of the growing season as the first occurrence of three or more consecutive days with mean air and soil surface temperature <0 °C. In 2007 and 2008 these conditions occurred between Julian days 152 and 257 and 144 and 259, respectively. Estimates of N2-fixation for all of the above growing season days were not possible for every N2-fixing association due to unavailable microclimatic data. Therefore, the total mean N input for each association was based on the average of 2007 and 2008 estimates over a 103 day growing season from 154 to 257 in both years. Air temperature, snow depth, and precipitation were determined from macroclimatic data from the local Daring Lake weather station (2007–2008; Bob Reid, INAC, unpublished data).

FIGURE 2

Seasonal trends in N2-fixation rate (μmol N m−2 day−1) estimated from potential N2-fixation rate models and field environmental data records for each N2-fixing association for 2007 and 2008 at Daring Lake, NWT. See Table 3 for further model details. ARA to N2-fixation conversion ratios (Table 2) were applied for each N2-fixing association.

i1523-0430-43-2-267-f02.tif

Quantification of N2-Fixing Associations in the Landscape

The areal extents of each of the N2-fixing associations within each ecosystem type (Xerophytic Herb Tundra, Heath-Lichen/Heath-Mat Tundra, Birch Hummock, Wet Sedge Meadows) in the study area were determined using line transects in June 2007. Ten parallel transects (∼50 m apart, and ∼1 km in length) were run from an esker ridge down across a valley and up to an elevated boulder field plateau within the East Daring Lake drainage basin. The variation in topography and therefore of vegetation types within the transect area is typical of the Barrenlands region and representative of the landscape study area. Percent cover of each N2-fixing association was visually estimated within all 25 × 25 cm2 subsections of 1 m2 quadrats that were placed every 10 m along each line transect. The dominant ecosystem type in each quadrat was noted, and then the mean percent cover of each of the four principal N2-fixing associations was visually estimated by two independent observers. The total area of each N2-fixing association within the landscape was estimated based on its mean % cover within each ecosystem type (determined from transect data) and the total area occupied by each ecosystem type within the 26.7 km2 landscape study area (determined from Obst, 2008).

The total mean growing season N input (kg ha−1 yr−1) for each N2-fixing association was estimated by averaging the 2007 and 2008 model outputs for Julian days 154–257 in both years. The total N input by each N2-fixing association within each ecosystem type was determined by multiplying the mean total growing season N input for each association (kg ha−1 yr−1) by the area (ha) occupied by each association. Total N input for each ecosystem type is the sum of N inputs from all N2-fixing associations within a given ecosystem type. Total landscape N input over the growing season was determined by summing N input from all N2-fixing associations in each of the ecosystem types over the growing season and dividing by the total landscape study area (26.7 km2).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Comparisons of mean N2-fixation rates by the principal N2-fixing associations over the growing season (June–August) under field and optimal conditions were analyzed using separate factorial analyses of variance (ANOVA) (N2-fixing type, month, and their interaction). Logistic regressions were used to develop the models of N2-fixation potential based on microclimate. Data from both 2007 and 2008 were used in comparisons of N2-fixation rates by the principal N2-fixing associations and in the models of N2-fixation potential based on microclimate. N2-fixation rates were log transformed prior to all statistical analyses (SYSTAT 8.0, Systat Software, Inc.).

Results

N2-FIXATION RATES OF THE PRINCIPAL CYANOBACTERIAL ASSOCIATIONS

Mean monthly N2-fixation rates under field conditions differed significantly among N2-fixing associations (F(3,2232)  =  156.51, P < 0.01) and were significantly different between months (F(2,2232)  =  3.40, P  =  0.03) (Table 2). The interaction of month and N2-fixing association was also significant (F(6,2232)  =  27.67, P < 0.01) with patterns of N2-fixation over the growing season (June–August) varying among the different associations. The highest rates of N2-fixation for all of the associations with the exception of S. paschale occurred in July; however, Hollow BSCs had lower rates in June compared with July and August, and Sphagnum spp. had lower rates in August compared with June and July.

N2-fixation rates under optimal conditions (200 µmol PAR m−2 s−1, 20 °C) differed among cyanobacterial associations (F(2,154)  =  181.15, P < 0.01) and between months (F(2,154)  =  8.17, P < 0.01), and there was a significant interaction between these two factors (F(4,154)  =  2.70, P  =  0.03). The highest N2-fixation rates under optimal conditions for all associations were in July (Table 2). The lowest rates under optimal conditions occurred in June for both Hollow BSCs and S. paschale, while the lowest rates occurred in August for Hummock BSCs.

Comparison of N2-fixation rates under field and optimal conditions clearly indicated that adverse in situ environmental factors severely curtailed N2-fixation, and that the extent of this constraint varied substantially among cyanobacterial associations. BSC associations had N2-fixation rates under optimal conditions that were 2–3 times higher than those observed under field conditions, while rates in S. paschale were 4–7 times higher under optimal conditions (Table 2).

LANDSCAPE-SCALE PATTERNS OF N INPUT

Microclimatic Models of Potential N2-Fixation for Each Cyanobacterial Association

Our simple models of N2-fixation rates in relation to either temperature and/or moisture explained at least 50% of the variation in the field incubation data (Table 3). N2-fixation rates were correlated with temperature in the high moisture and low moisture category samples (R2  =  0.77, P < 0.001; R2  =  0.78, P < 0.001, respectively) of Hollow BSC associations (Table 3). Similarly, N2-fixation rates were correlated with temperature in the high moisture and low moisture category samples (R2  =  0.56, P < 0.001; R 2  =  0.50, P < 0.001, respectively) of Hummock BSC associations (Table 3). N2-fixation rates for the Sphagnum spp. cyanobacterial associations were also correlated with temperature (R2  =  0.72, P < 0.001), while S. paschale rates were significantly correlated with days since precipitation (R2  =  0.69, P < 0.001) (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Potential N2-fixation rate logistic regression models based on acetylene reduction (AR) rates in field incubations for each of the principal N2-fixing associations. Hollow and Hummock BSC data were each separated into two moisture classes as indicated. Environmental variables included in models are surface temperature of Hollow (Tho) and Hummock (Thu) BSCs, Sphagnum spp. temperature at 2 cm depth (Ts), and Days since precipitation (Dsp). The dependent variable for all models is log acetylene reduction (μmol C2H4 m−2 hr−1).

i1523-0430-43-2-267-t03.tif

Seasonal trends of N2-fixation estimated by using full growing season field microclimatic records in the models indicated that each N2-fixing association had similar patterns of activity in 2007 and 2008 (Fig. 2). N2-fixation inputs in Hollow BSC, Hummock BSC, and Sphagnum spp. associations fluctuated dynamically during the first half of the season but tended to generally increase toward peak values in mid to late July, and then to decline fairly steadily afterwards. No clear seasonal trend could be observed for S. paschale because estimates were based solely on days since precipitation. The model estimates of mean total N input across the growing season (3 June to 13 September) for each cyanobacterial association ranged from 3.4 kg N ha−1 yr−1 (Hollow BSCs) to 24.9 kg N ha−1 yr−1 (S. paschale) for a 103 day growing season (Table 4).

TABLE 4

Mean total N fixed over the growing season (3 June to 13 September) based on estimates of N2-fixation by Hollow BSC, Hummock BSC, Sphagnum spp., and Stereocaulon paschale at Daring Lake, Northwest Territories, in 2007 and 2008. Microclimatic models were used to predict hourly acetylene reduction rates per m2 (See Table 3). ARA to N2-fication conversion ratios (Table 2) were applied for each N2-fixing association. Rates were summed to give total mg N m−2 yr−1 based on the 2007 and 2008 growing seasons indicated by Julian days. The mean of 2007 and 2008 estimates based on a 103 day growing season (154–257) in both years was used to determine mean total N.

i1523-0430-43-2-267-t04.tif

N Input by N2-Fixing Associations and by Ecosystem Types

No single N2-fixing association dominated N inputs across all of the ecosystem types. Stereocaulon paschale was the largest source of N input in both Xerophytic Herb Tundra and Heath-Lichen/Heath-Mat Tundra followed by Hummock BSC (Table 5). Sphagnum spp. was the largest source of N input in both Birch Hummock and Wet Sedge Meadow ecosystems followed by Hollow BSC. Despite having the highest mean N2-fixation rate, S. paschale did not have the highest overall landscape N input (549.84 kg; Fig. 3). Sphagnum spp. had the highest N input (1030.72 kg) due to its relatively high mean N2-fixation rate and greater area within the landscape (50.28 ha) compared with S. paschale (22.11 ha) (Fig. 3).

FIGURE 3

(a) Mean N2-fixation rate measured over the growing seasons of 2007 and 2008 (see Table 2), (b) total area of N2-fixing associations in landscape study area, and (c) total N input for Hollow biological soil crusts (BSCs), Hummock BSCs, Sphagnum spp., and Stereocaulon paschale determined by potential N2-fixation models in the landscape study area at Daring Lake, NWT. Total area of N2-fixing associations and total N input in landscape study area were calculated from values in Table 5. Error bars in (a) indicate standard error.

i1523-0430-43-2-267-f03.tif

TABLE 5

The contributions of individual N2-fixing associations to total biological N input across the selected landscape study area and to N inputs per unit area for each of the major ecosystem types at Daring Lake, Northwest Territories, over the growing season (Julian days 154 to 257).

i1523-0430-43-2-267-t05.tif

We used the model estimates of growing season N2-fixation by each cyanobacterial association along with the mapping data of the distribution of ecosystem types in our landscape study area to estimate overall N inputs in each ecosystem type. Total N input per unit area was ∼10 times higher in the Wet Sedge Meadow than in any other ecosystem type (Table 5). Our spatially explicit analyses indicate that this effect can be explained by particularly high inputs by Sphagnum spp. cyanobacterial associations due to relatively large fixation rates (Table 4) in combination with relatively high proportional cover of this association in the Wet Sedge Meadow (Table 5). Heath-Lichen/Heath-Mat Tundra had relatively low N inputs per unit area but had the largest total N input in our selected landscape study area because of its abundant coverage in the landscape. Birch Hummock tundra had similar total N2-fixation rates per unit area to Heath-Lichen/Heath-Mat Tundra, but its coverage was low in the study area, resulting in low total N inputs. Finally, N2-fixation rates per unit area within Xerophytic Herb Tundra were lowest, and its coverage was also low, resulting in relatively small N inputs into the selected landscape study area. Total N input for 68% the Daring Lake landscape study area over the 103 day growing season was 0.68 kg ha−1 yr−1.

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that biological N2-fixation across a low arctic landscape is both temporally and spatially heterogeneous due to the presence of distinct cyanobacterial associations that varied in their responses to seasonal environmental changes, and in their distribution among vegetation types. Our study design integrated individual N2-fixing association responses to seasonal microclimatic conditions, the abundance of each N2-fixing association within different ecosystem types, and the prevalence of the ecosystem types within the landscape. By employing this multiscale approach we not only provided a landscape-level estimate of N input via N2-fixation (0.68 kg ha−1 yr−1), but also identified the ecosystem type (Wet Sedge Meadow), cyanobacterial association (Sphagnum spp.), and microclimatic controls (moisture and temperature) that are key to understanding biological N inputs. In addition, we found a significant interaction between growing season month and type of N2-fixing association, indicating that changes in seasonal progression of N2-fixation activity vary among cyanobacterial associations. Further, our results highlight the importance of considering both the abundance cover and average N2-fixation rate of each N2-fixing association in characterizing the controls on patterns of N input across the landscape, and in estimating the total magnitude of N inputs. For example, the primary importance of Sphagnum spp. associations to total landscape N inputs was due to their relatively high rates of N2-fixation, as well as their high percent cover compared to the other N2-fixing associations. By contrast, the lichen S. paschale was relatively infrequent on the landscape but made the second largest contribution to total N inputs because it had particularly high rates of N2-fixation (Fig. 3). Together these results provide substantial insights into the principal factors causing both temporal and spatial heterogeneity in biological N2-fixation inputs in the low Arctic.

MICROCLIMATIC CONTROLS ON SEASONAL AND SPATIAL VARIATION IN N2-FIXATION

Several studies have detected distinct seasonal patterns in N2-fixation rates in the Arctic (Alexander and Schell, 1973; Henry and Svoboda, 1986; Chapin et al., 1991; Zielke et al., 2005). Our data (Table 2 and Fig. 2) are consistent with the general pattern of detectable N2-fixation rates soon after snowmelt (March–June) followed by the highest rates coinciding with the peak growing season and declining rates in late July to August depending on latitude. Our field measurements of N2-fixation demonstrate that seasonal patterns vary among the vegetation communities, which may account for the lack of seasonal variation detected in studies that average across both topography and vegetation type (Hobara et al., 2006).

Moisture appears to be one of the most important environmental factors controlling N2-fixation across various arctic environments (Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992; Nash and Olafsen, 1995; Zielke et al., 2002, 2005). Moisture can affect seasonal patterns of N2-fixation within individual N2-fixing communities, and spatial heterogeneity in N2-fixation is often a reflection of differences in cyanobacterial biomass due to the long-term characteristics of the community moisture regime (Chapin et al., 1991). Stereocaulon paschale, which was primarily located on xeric esker tops and well-drained upper esker slopes, had the highest mean rate of N2-fixation over the growing season, but demonstrated a strong sensitivity to desiccation. Lichens are often established on drier exposed habitats where nitrogenase activity may be reduced to a few comparatively short episodes when moisture conditions are suitable (Crittenden and Kershaw, 1979). Rainfall in July 2008 was 6.7 mm compared to 24.6 mm and 28.1 mm in June and August, respectively. Accordingly, the average percent moisture of S. paschale incubated in July was 26% as compared to June (56%) and August (45%), perhaps explaining the relatively low July N2-fixation rates. The relatively high and consistent N2-fixation rates associated with Sphagnum spp. over the growing season are likely due to the consistently high moisture conditions of the low-lying Wet Sedge Meadow where Sphagnum spp. are the dominant vegetation.

Temperature has also been significantly correlated with N2-fixation rates in the Arctic (Smith, 1984; Lennihan et al., 1994; Liengen and Olsen, 1997b; Zielke et al., 2002). Our strong correlations between N2-fixation and temperature for Hollow BSC, Hummock BSC, and Sphagnum spp. indicate that seasonal temperature fluctuations are important in determining seasonal rates of N2-fixation. Like Zielke et al. (2005), we also found that temperature was a good predictor of N2-fixation provided different models were used depending on moisture condition. Hollow BSC had lower field and optimal rates of N2-fixation in June compared with other cyanobacterial associations (Table 2). Mean Hollow BSC temperature in June was 6.8 °C compared to 9.1 °C for Hummock BSC. Therefore, the lower rates of N2-fixation for Hollow BSC are likely due to the persistence of snow in these depressions resulting in relatively low temperatures, as well as restricted light inputs that together may impede the recovery and development of cyanobacterial communities in the early growing season (Fig. 4).

FIGURE 4

Hummock-hollow complexes at Daring Lake, NWT, 17 June 2008. Differences in early season fixation rates between Hollow and Hummock BSC may result from snow covering hollows of hummock-hollow complexes whereas Hummock BSC is exposed.

i1523-0430-43-2-267-f04.tif

Some studies have found N2-fixation to be light dependent (Granhall and Lid-Torsvik, 1975; Alexander et al., 1978) while others have found little light dependence as photosynthetic rates tend to saturate at relatively low light levels (<500 µmol PAR m−2 s−1) (Coxson and Kershaw, 1983b; Smith, 1984; Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992; Nash and Olafsen, 1995; Zielke et al., 2002). Varying light conditions (0 to 1000 µmol PAR m−2 s−1) did not affect Sphagnum spp. N2-fixation rates in our study, supporting the concept that stored energy for N2-fixation, combined with continuous or near continuous daylight and a limited plant canopy, reduce the potential for light to act as a controlling factor on N2-fixation in the Arctic (Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992). Nevertheless, remote sensing, repeat photography, and experimental nutrient addition studies all suggest that current warming trends in the low Arctic may be promoting shrub growth and expansion within various topographic positions (Goetz et al., 2005; Sturm et al., 2001; Chapin et al., 1995). Declining macrolichen abundance in warming sub- and mid-arctic environments may be a function of increased growth and abundance of deciduous shrubs, which may inhibit lichen performance and persistence through shading (Cornelissen et al., 2001). N2-fixation rates and persistence of other N2-fixing associations in these environments may also be similarly influenced by reduced light availability.

The higher N2-fixation rates detected under optimal conditions for all N2-fixing associations indicate that microclimatic conditions in the field are limiting N2-fixation for all of the principal N2-fixing associations. We conclude that climate change scenarios that result in warmer surface temperatures without increased surface desiccation are likely to lead to higher rates of N2-fixation (Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992).

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF BIOLOGICAL N2-FIXATION TO N CYCLING IN A LOW ARCTIC LANDSCAPE

Since N availability is commonly a major limitation on tundra plant growth, our results provide important insights to understanding the functioning of low arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Our estimate of mean seasonal N2-fixation in Birch Hummock (Table 5; 1.4 kg−1 ha−1 yr−1 over 103 days) is ∼1/300th the late summer rate of gross N mineralization by soil microbes in the same ecosystem type (Buckeridge et al., 2010). Therefore, internal recycling of N from soil organic matter is undoubtedly the critical N supply process within the Birch Hummock ecosystem type at least. Nevertheless our data suggest a significant influence of N2-fixation on N cycling and carbon uptake at a larger scale. N2-fixation during the growing season was highest in the Wet Sedge Meadow, which is also the ecosystem with the largest annual plant primary production in this landscape (Nobrega and Grogan, 2008). Nutrient inputs associated with run-off and leachates from higher elevation ecosystems toward the valley floor where wet sedge ecosystems predominate may facilitate the high rates of primary production there. Our data here suggest that in addition to that process, in situ N2-fixation inputs may be an important pathway supplying N to support the high primary productivity of this ecosystem type.

Total biological N2-fixation input across the study landscape area was estimated at 0.68 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Previous estimates of arctic N2-fixation inputs range from 0.06 to 3 kg N ha−1 yr−1, with the majority of estimates ranging from 0.10 to 1.20 kg N ha−1 yr−1 (Alexander and Schell, 1973; Barsdate and Alexander, 1975; Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992; Hobara et al., 2006). Summertime mean atmospheric N inputs from wet deposition at the nearest monitoring station (63.52°N, 116.00°W) to Daring Lake (∼240 km away) were 0.39 kg N ha−1 yr−1 (1991–2006; CAPMon, Environment Canada, unpublished data). Wintertime atmospheric N deposition inputs as total inorganic N accumulation in ambient snow packs (0.3 m) at Daring Lake in 2007 were 0.05 kg N ha−1 (Buckeridge and Grogan, 2010). Together, these numbers suggest that total biological N2-fixation input for the landscape study area at Daring Lake is approximately twice the amount of N deposited via atmospheric deposition. While some studies have found N2-fixation contributed 80% or higher to total landscape N inputs (Hobara et al., 2006; Solheim et al., 2006), other studies, including ours, have found the contribution of N2-fixation to ecosystem N inputs is approximately 50–70% (Chapin and Bledsoe, 1992; Henry and Svoboda, 1986).

We found N2-fixation across a low arctic tundra landscape was concentrated in the Wet Sedge Meadow ecosystem type where N2-fixation per unit area was ∼10 times higher than in any of the other ecosystem types (Table 5). Of the four principal N2-fixing associations, Sphagnum spp., which had the highest percent cover in Wet Sedge Meadows, made the largest contribution (55.2%) to total N input. Several other studies have also found the highest rates of N2-fixation in arctic landscapes are associated with cyanobacteria moss associations (Alexander and Schell, 1973; Henry and Svoboda, 1986; Solheim et al., 1996).

Five methodological constraints may have affected our landscape estimates of biological N2-fixation inputs. Firstly, conversion ratios can vary depending on the operating environment of a given N2-fixing association (Millbank, 1981; Gunther, 1989), and seasonal variation in conversion ratios has been detected for free-living cyanobacteria from high arctic habitats (Liengen, 1999b). Secondly, we used visual estimates of abundance for the N2-fixing associations without accounting for variations in cyanobacterial biomass that can impact rates of N2-fixation. Thirdly, the ecosystem types in our analysis account for only 68% of the Daring Lake study area. Some excluded ecosystem types (Exposed Sand and Gravel, and Rocky Outcrops) probably contribute little or nothing to landscape N input. However, other ecosystem types such as Dry Sedge Meadows (8.2%) may contain considerable Sphagnum spp. cyanobacterial associations and therefore may make significant contributions to landscape N input, albeit for a limited duration due to less favorable microclimatic conditions. Fourthly, our estimates of modeled N inputs would have been improved by more accurate quantification of spatial variability in soil surface microclimate by using a much larger number of climate sensors. This is a limitation that is common to many studies of arctic and subarctic ecosystems (Rouse, 1976; Young et al., 1997). Fortunately, the type of conditions that favor N2-fixation by most cyanobacterial associations (i.e. during or immediately following growing season precipitation events) will tend to minimize between site variability in soil surface microclimate, reducing the impact of this factor on our estimates. Fifthly, we used a 103 day growing season as the basis for yearly N input. However, N2-fixation likely occurs outside of this period whenever microclimatic conditions are favorable (Davey, 1983; Liengen, 1999a; Zielke et al., 2002; Hobara et al., 2006). In summary we conclude that, provided our conversion ratios, percent cover of cyanobacterial associations, and models of potential N2-fixation are sufficiently accurate, our estimates of ecosystem N2-fixation inputs and of total landscape-level N input over the growing season are minimum values.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kelvin Kotchilea, Rebecca Carmichael, Ryan Mercredi, Tyanna Steinwand, and Mat Vankoughnett for assistance in the field, and Steve Matthews and Andy Kritsch for logistical support. We also thank Burkhard Büdel, Olivia Lee, and Curtis Bjork for identification of cyanobacteria, bryophyte, and soil crust species. Elyn Humphreys' contribution of microclimate data from the Wet Sedge Meadow and John McKay's provision of the atmospheric N deposition data are greatly appreciated. This study was supported by NSERC and the Canadian Federal Government as part of the International Polar Year 2007–2008 in collaboration with Climate Change Impacts on Canadian Arctic Tundra (CiCAT) project.

References Cited

1.

V. Alexander 1974. A synthesis of the IBP tundra biome circumpolar study of nitrogen fixation. In A. J. Holding, O. W. Heal, S. F. MacLean, and P. W. Flanagan . (eds.). Soil Organisms and Decomposition in Tundra. Stockholm, Sweden Tundra Biome Steering Committee. 109–121. Google Scholar

2.

V. Alexander and D. M. Schell . 1973. Seasonal and spatial variation of nitrogen fixation in the Barrow, Alaska, tundra. Arctic and Alpine Research 5:77–88. Google Scholar

3.

V. M. Alexander, M. Billington, and D. M. Schell . 1978. Nitrogen fixation in arctic and alpine tundra. In L. L. Tieszen (ed.). Vegetation and Production Ecology of an Alaskan Arctic Tundra. New York Springer-Verlag. 539–558. Google Scholar

4.

R. J. Barsdate and V. Alexander . 1975. The nitrogen balance of arctic tundra: pathways, rates and environmental implications. Journal of Environmental Quality 4:111–117. Google Scholar

5.

K. Basilier and U. Granhall . 1978. Nitrogen fixation in wet minerotrophic moss communities of a subarctic mire. Oikos 31:236–246. Google Scholar

6.

D. R. Bazely and R. L. Jefferies . 1989. Lesser snow geese and the nitrogen economy of a grazed salt-marsh. Journal of Ecology 77:24–34. Google Scholar

7.

K. M. Buckeridge and P. Grogan . 2010. Deepened snow increases late thaw biogeochemical pulses in mesic low arctic tundra. Biogeochemistry 101:105–121. Google Scholar

8.

K. M. Buckeridge, E. Zufelt, H. Chu, and P. Grogan . 2010. Soil nitrogen cycling rates in low arctic shrub tundra are enhanced by litter feedbacks. Plant Soil 330:407–421. Google Scholar

9.

D. M. Chapin and C. Bledsoe . 1992. Nitrogen fixation in arctic plant communities. In R. S. Chapin III, R. L. Jefferies, J. F. Reynolds, G. R. Shaver, and J. Svoboda . (eds.). Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate: An Ecophysiological Perspective. San Diego Academic Press. 301–319. Google Scholar

10.

D. M. Chapin, L. C. Bliss, and L. J. Bledsoe . 1991. Environmental regulation of nitrogen fixation in a high arctic lowland ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Botany 69:2744–2755. Google Scholar

11.

F. S. Chapin III, G. R. Shaver, A. E. Giblin, J. Knute, J. Nadelhoffer, and J. A. Laundre . 1995. Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology 76:694–711. Google Scholar

12.

J. H. C. Cornelissen, T. V. Callaghan, J. M. Alatalo, A. Michelsen, E. Graglia, A. E. Hartley, D. S. Hik, S. E. Hobbie, M. C. Press, C. H. Robinson, G. H. R. Henry, G. R. Shaver, G. K. Phoenix, D. Gwynn Jones, S. Jonasson, F. S. Chapin III, U. Molau, C. Neil, J. A. Lee, J. M. Mellillo, B. Sveinbjornsson, and R. Aerts . 2001. Global change and arctic ecosystems: Is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? Journal of Ecology 89:984–994. Google Scholar

13.

D. S. Coxson 1991. Impedance measurement of thallus moisture content in lichens. Lichenologist 23:77–84. Google Scholar

14.

D. S. Coxson and K. A. Kershaw . 1983a. Rehydration response of nitrogenase activity in terrestrial Nostoc commune from Stipa-Bouteloa grassland. Canadian Journal of Botany 61:2658–2668. Google Scholar

15.

D. S. Coxson and K. A. Kershaw . 1983b. The pattern of in situ summer nitrogenase activity in terrestrial Nostoc commune from Stipa-Bouteloa grassland, southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 61:2686–2693. Google Scholar

16.

P. D. Crittenden and K. A. Kershaw . 1978. Discovering the role of lichens in the nitrogen cycle in the boreal-arctic ecosystem. The Bryologist 81:258–267. Google Scholar

17.

P. D. Crittenden and K. A. Kershaw . 1979. Studies on lichen-dominated systems. XXII. The environmental control of nitrogenase activity in Stereocaulon paschale in spruce-lichen woodland. Canadian Journal of Botany 57:236–254. Google Scholar

18.

A. Davey 1983. Effects of abiotic factors on nitrogen fixation by blue-green algae in Antarctica. Polar Biology 2:95–100. Google Scholar

19.

L. G. Dickson 2000. Constraints to nitrogen fixation by cryptogamic crusts in a polar desert ecosystem, Devon Island, N.W.T., Canada. Arctic and Alpine Research 32:40–45. Google Scholar

20.

S. J. Goetz, A. J. Bunn, G. J. Fiske, and R. A. Houghton . 2005. Satellite observed photosynthetic trends across boreal North America associated with climate and fire disturbance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:13521–13525. Google Scholar

21.

U. Granhall and V. Lid-Torsvik . 1975. Nitrogen fixation by bacteria and free-living blue-green algae in tundra areas. In F. E. Wielgolaske (ed.). Fennoscandian Tundra Ecosystems, Part 1, vol 16. New York Springer-Verlag. 306–315. Google Scholar

22.

U. Granhall and H. Selander . 1973. Nitrogen fixation in a subarctic mire. Oikos 24:8–15. Google Scholar

23.

A. J. Gunther 1989. Nitrogen fixation by lichens in a subarctic Alaskan watershed. The Bryologist 92:202–208. Google Scholar

24.

G. H. R. Henry and J. Svoboda . 1986. Dinitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) in high arctic sedge meadow communities. Arctic and Alpine Research 18:181–187. Google Scholar

25.

S. Hobara, C. McCalley, K. Koba, A. E. Giblin, M. S. Weiss, G. M. Gettel, and G. R. Shaver . 2006. Nitrogen fixation in surface soils and vegetation in an Arctic tundra watershed: a key source of atmospheric nitrogen. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 38:363–372. Google Scholar

26.

INAC 2007. Daily and hourly weather data from the weather station at Daring Lake (raw data on Excel spread sheets). Yellowknife, NT Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), Water Resources Division (courtesy of B. Reid). Google Scholar

27.

P. M. Lafleur and E. R. Humphreys . 2008. Spring warming and carbon dioxide exchange over low arctic tundra in central Canada. Global Change Biology 14:1–17. Google Scholar

28.

R. Lennihan, D. M. Chapin, and L. G. Dickson . 1994. Nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis in high arctic forms of Nostoc commune. Canadian Journal of Botany 72:940–945. Google Scholar

29.

T. Liengen 1999a. Environmental factors influencing the nitrogen fixation activity of free-living terrestrial cyanobacteria from a high arctic area, Spitsbergen. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 45:573–581. Google Scholar

30.

T. Liengen 1999b. Conversion factor between acetylene reduction and nitrogen fixation in free-living cyanobacteria from high arctic habitats. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 45:223–229. Google Scholar

31.

T. Liengen and R. A. Olsen . 1997a. Seasonal and site-specific variations in nitrogen fixation in a high Arctic area, Ny-Alesund, Spitsbergen. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 43:759–769. Google Scholar

32.

T. Liengen and R. A. Olsen . 1997b. Nitrogen fixation by free-living cyanobacteria from different coastal sites in a high Arctic tundra, Spitsbergen. Arctic and Alpine Research 29:470–477. Google Scholar

33.

J. W. Millbank 1981. The assessment of nitrogen fixation and throughput by lichens I. The use of a controlled environment chamber to relate acetylene reduction estimates to nitrogen fixation. New Phytologist 89:647–655. Google Scholar

34.

K. J. Nadelhoffer, A. E. Giblin, G. R. Shaver, and A. E. Linkins . 1992. Microbial processes and plant nutrient availability in arctic soils. In R. S. Chapin III, R. L. Jefferies, J. F. Reynolds, G. R. Shaver, and J. Svoboda . (eds.). Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate: an Ecophysiological Perspective. San Diego Academic Press, Inc. 281–300. Google Scholar

35.

T. H. Nash III and A. G. Olafsen . 1995. Climate change and the ecophysiological response of arctic lichens. Lichenologist 27:559–565. Google Scholar

36.

S. Nobrega and P. Grogan . 2008. Landscape and ecosystem-level controls on net carbon dioxide exchange along a natural moisture gradient in Canadian low arctic tundra. Ecosystems 11:377–396. Google Scholar

37.

J. Obst 2008. Classification of land cover, vegetation communities, ecosystems and habitats in East Daring Lake Basin, Northwest Territories. Prepared for Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Wildlife Division Government of the Northwest Territories and Environment and Conservation Division, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Yellowknife, NT. Contact: Steve_Matthews@gov.nt.ca. Google Scholar

38.

A. N. Rai, E. Soderback, and B. Bergman . 2000. Cyanobacterium-plant symbioses. New Phytologist 147:449–481. Google Scholar

39.

W. R. Rouse 1976. Microclimatic changes accompanying burning in subarctic lichen woodland. Arctic and Alpine Research 8:357–376. Google Scholar

40.

D. M. Schell and V. Alexander . 1973. Nitrogen fixation in arctic coastal tundra in relation to vegetation and micro-relief. Arctic 26:130–137. Google Scholar

41.

G. R. Shaver and F. S. Chapin III . 1980. Responses to fertilization by various plant growth forms in an Alaskan tundra: nutrient accumulation and growth. Ecology 61:662–675. Google Scholar

42.

V. R. Smith 1984. Effects of abiotic factors on acetylene reduction by cyanobacteria epiphytic on moss at a subarctic island. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 48:594–600. Google Scholar

43.

B. Solheim, A. Endal, and H. Vigstad . 1996. Nitrogen fixation in arctic vegetation and soils from Svalbard, Norway. Polar Biology 16:35–40. Google Scholar

44.

B. Solheim, M. Zielke, J. W. Bjerke, and J. Rozema . 2006. Effects of enhanced UV-B radiation on nitrogen fixation in arctic ecosystems. Plant Ecology 182:109–118. Google Scholar

45.

W. D. P. Stewart, G. P. Fritzgerald, and R. H. Burris . 1967. In situ studies on N2 fixation using the acetylene reduction technique. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 58:2071–2078. Google Scholar

46.

M. Sturm, C. Racine, and K. Tape . 2001. Climate change—Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411:546–547. Google Scholar

47.

M. R. Turetsky 2003. The role of bryophytes in carbon and nitrogen cycling. The Bryologist 106:395–409. Google Scholar

48.

D. A. Walker 2000. Hierarchical subdivision of arctic tundra based on vegetation response to climate, parent material, and topography. Global Change Biology 6:19–34. Google Scholar

49.

K. L. Young, M. Woo, and S. A. Edlund . 1997. Influence of local topography, soils, and vegetation on microclimate and hydrology at a high arctic site, Ellesmere Island, Canada. Arctic and Alpine Research 29:270–284. Google Scholar

50.

M. Zielke, A. S. Ekker, R. A. Olsen, S. Spjelkavik, and B. Solheim . 2002. The influence of abiotic factors on biological nitrogen fixation in different types of vegetation in the high arctic, Svalbard. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 34:293–299. Google Scholar

51.

M. Zielke, B. Solheim, S. Spjelkavik, and R. A. Olsen . 2005. Nitrogen fixation in the High Arctic: role of vegetation and environmental conditions. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 37:372–378. Google Scholar
Katherine J. Stewart, Darwyn Coxson, and Paul Grogan "Nitrogen Inputs by Associative Cyanobacteria across a Low Arctic Tundra Landscape," Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 43(2), 267-278, (1 May 2011). https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-43.2.267
Accepted: 1 October 2010; Published: 1 May 2011
Back to Top