BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
7 November 2024 Ornithology from the Flatlands

Humans guiding the first migration of hand-raised ibises: on social learning and culture in birds

img-z1-1_165.jpg

As this editorial is written in late summer 2024, the Waldrappteam ( www.waldrappteam.at) is engaged in guiding, for the second time, a group of 36 young, hand-raised, Northern Bald Ibises Geronticus eremita from southern Germany to southern Spain. Hatchling birds from a free-flying population at Zoo Rosegg in Austria are hand-reared in southern Germany by two foster-mothers (always wearing yellow pullovers and T-shirts). At fledgling-age, the ibises are taken outside to an aviary, and then, as their flight abilities mature in May and June, they are trained to fly as a flock behind an ultralight paraplane – a powered parachute, really (Figure 1 top). The ultralight is a two-seater, with a pilot and a foster-mother trying to coordinate the flights of the ibises with their own (Figure 1 bottom). At some point in their training (on 21 August 2023 and on 13 August 2024), the young ibises are gauged to be ready to start southward migration. They will then go all the way to Andalusia, following a trajectory that takes the group around the Alps, across the Rhone valley towards, and then across, the eastern end of the Pyrenees, followed by a crossing of Spain along a northeast to southwest axis. The goal of the journey is Vejer de la Frontera, with a resident breeding population of the Northern Bald Ibis – and friendly folk to receive the ibises and care for them (see:  www.uvabits.nl/project/northern-bald-ibis-geronticus-eremita-reintroduction-programme-in-andalusia/) .

The travel updates at  www.waldrapp.at report the struggles during days when the ibis-apprentices stray away from the route suggested by the yellow-parachuted ultralight with pilot and a foster-mother teacher. Part of the group may lag behind and eventually start flying back to the site of take-off that morning; or do even less predictable things. That young birds don't always do as their teachers tell them is noteworthy and may have consequences. A study on Barnacle Geese Branta leucopsis showed that although adults are in the lead in migrating family groups, it was juveniles that made the switch to an alternative staging site during spring migration (Oudman et al. 2020).

After their arrival in Andalusia, the young Northern Bald Ibises are hosted first in a large flight aviary, where at night they have the company of resident ibises coming to the site to roost (some of them sleeping on the actual cage). Having been together for seven months, the hand-reared birds must be weaned from their foster-mothers (and their foster-mothers from them!), so that later in the year, after the birds have established contact with the sedentary colony, the aviary can be opened and the birds released into the wild. Then, by living among the resident ibises, the young birds from Germany have to learn the local ecology and so become independent. The idea that they will follow the same route north to where they grew up has been tested before in experiments to re-establish a migration corridor across the Alps from Austria and Germany to southern Tuscany, Italy (Fritz et al. 2017, Fritz 2021, Drenske et al. 2023). This first northward migration may happen after the first winter, but is more likely to happen in the years thereafter as few ibises breed as one-year olds. The hope is that the successfully migrating birds become the nucleus of a population of proper seasonal migrants between southern Germany and southern Spain.

Perfecting these procedures over two decades, with the 2024 effort being the 19th guided migration, the Waldrappteam of Johannes Fritz has made great use of the opportunities to be with, and fly with, hand-raised birds. Just like other ibises and spoonbills in the Threskiornithidae, flocks of Northern Bald Ibises tend to arrange their group flights as echelons or as V's. When travelling with the ultralight, the ibis usually fly in such formations as well (Figure 1). When they fly close behind another bird, they can benefit from the upwash of wingbeats made by the bird in the lead (Portugal et al. 2014). With data collected by GPS-loggers fastened to their backs, it was discovered that the individuals take turns in accepting the more demanding front position, being carefully reciprocal to one another (Voelkl et al. 2015, Voelkl & Fritz 2017). Not only do they actively cooperate to make flight easier (or at least less energetically costly), young Northern Bald Ibises also strategically use thermal soaring to gain altitude and alternate the more demanding phase of flapping flight by short stretches of gliding (Wehner et al. 2022). Clearly, the birds manage to master lots of skills during their first months of life.

Figure 1.

Formation flying by an ultralight and Northern Bald Ibises. The foster-mothers in yellow give encouragement and instruction to the hand-raised birds they know so well, and with which they spend much of the on-the-ground time too (top photo Helena Wehner, bottom photo Anne-Gabriela Schmalstieg).

img-z2-3_165.jpg

The reciprocal collaboration in flight indicates that individual ibises know each other intimately and are acutely aware of each other's activities; they take that knowledge into account when deciding on what comes next. It seems likely that they not only learn things about each other, but also from each other, i.e. that they exhibit social learning (distinguished from ‘asocial’ learning as the learning that is facilitated by observation of, or interaction with, another individual or its products; Hoppitt & Laland 2013). The comprehensive review by Newton (2024) in this issue of ‘Ardea’ shows that social learning of, and during, seasonal migration occurs in pretty much all types of migratory birds, thus eclipsing the special status of taxa migrating in family groups (such as the cranes, geese and swans, e.g. Mueller et al. 2013, Kölzsch et al. 2020). Migratory birds do not necessarily have to learn from family members, they may learn from unrelated conspecifics (Loonstra et al. 2023) and even accept information from other, co-occurring, species (Cohen & Satterfield 2020). The Waldrapp project is a case of the latter, as it demonstrates that young Northern Bald Ibises, just like cranes (Teitelbaum et al. 2019), can learn from their human companions. How this works in practice is illustrated by a published update of 6 July 2024 ( www.waldrappteam.at/en/hlm2024/): “Exciting news, today was the first day our microlight plane took off and had a practice flight around the migration camp, landing in a nearby field. The flight went incredibly well, and the birds started to understand how to follow the plane. One of the foster mothers rode in the plane while the other called for the birds from the landing field. The birds are able to recognize the foster mother’s call, which teaches them to follow the plane.” Northern Bald Ibises go to school, in this experimental case with human teachers.

This brings us to culture. Typically defined for humans only, and referring to “the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society” ( https://languages.oup.com/), biologists now commonly use the culture concept too. The ‘biological definition’ of culture boils down to “behaviours that are socially learnt and acquired, shared by members of a group or community and persistent over time” (Aplin 2019, Aikens et al. 2022). Clearly then, the privilege of the supposedly brainier corvids and parrots (Olkowicz et al. 2016) as the only bird taxa intelligent enough to show social learning of behaviours (e.g. Emery & Clayton 2004, Martinho-Truswell 2022) needs qualification. The ibises live by the statement of Byrne et al. (2004) that “culture can be exhibited by any animal with a mind that allows social learning”.

The description by primatologist Jane Goodall (van Lawick-Goodall & van Lawick-Goodall 1966) of Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus using stones to crack the eggs of Ostriches Struthio camelus to access the nutritious content, is one of the first examples of birds showing tool use. In their story a subordinate, and possibly young and inexperienced, individual started what looked like ‘practicing’: dropping rather than throwing stones previously used by the two dominants on an already cracked and half-empty egg. This strongly hints at social learning and ‘vulture culture’ (a term coined by Arrondo et al. 2023). Since, many examples of avian cultural behaviour have been published with respect to foraging, vocalizing, nest building, movement behaviours, habitat selection and, indeed, seasonal migration (Table 1). However, descriptions of culture always referred to single behavioural expressions. In 1973 Clifford Geertz, a canonical figure in the field of cultural anthropology, explained that “The concept of culture I espouse, …is essentially a semiotic one. [Semiotics is the systematic study of signs, symbols, and the communication of meaning] Believing, …, that man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun, I take culture to be those webs, and the analysis of it to be therefore not an experimental science in search of law but an interpretive one in search of meaning.” (Geertz 1973). If we accept this for birds, it mandates an interrogation of the cultural meaning of behaviour, a search for ‘webs of significance’ in the life of birds. One wonders whether the rather ‘piecemeal approach’ to culture (Table 1) may have inhibited interpretations of meaning, or indeed the discovery of evidence that birds also spin ‘webs of significance’.

At this point, Godfrey-Smith's (2024) reminder of a conversation between a Martian space traveller and a Venusian time traveller, a story dreamed up by Hansell (2007), becomes relevant. When they meet, the time-travelling Venusian has returned from a trip to the Earth several million years into the future. He was impressed by the complex technology on that planet, and said it was engineered by apes. The Martian, who had just travelled to Earth too (but not in the future), was greatly surprised. “What, [by] that lot? You're kidding me. They don't build anything. I had a stick waved at me once or twice… I would have put my money on the birds. I brought back a nice bird nest from Earth last time… Clever craftmanship using several materials.” Which brings us to guineafowl (Numididae), birds which are hardly known for their (collective) intelligence (and not for their advanced nest building either). In fact, according to  https://collectivenounslist.com/guineafowls/ “when guineafowls come together collectively, they form a unit called a ‘confusion’. This term encapsulates both the mesmerizing sight of multiple guineafowls gathered in one place and the natural confusion that arises when witnessing their simultaneous movements and unpredictable patterns.” Fascinating work on individually tagged Vulturine Guineafowl Acryllium vulturinum (Papageorgiou & Farine 2020a,b, Papageorgiou et al. 2019, 2024) shows how utterly misplaced this label is. These guineafowls live their lives in complex societies, with individuals being just as acutely aware of each other’s identities, ranks and personalities as suggested for Northern Bald Ibises (Pegoraro & Föger 2001, Szipl et al. 2014, Voelkl & Fritz 2017). Clearly, all birds may be deeply cultural in Geertz’ sense of the word, living in webs of significance, in worlds of meaning, even in worlds of beauty and values (Skutch 1992, Prum 2017). This has radical implications for biology as well as the humanities (Foster 2021).

Table 1.

Examples of bird behaviours interpreted as learned and potentially ‘cultural’ (in chronological order, extended from review by Aplin 2019).

img-z4-10_165.gif

The project in which humans guide young Northern Bald Ibises along an extinct migration route (from central to southwest Europe and probably beyond to West Africa; Fritz & Janák 2022) is now opening many windows of enquiry, including the nature of intra- and interspecific social learning and the nature of migration cultures. Indeed, the growing sophistication of the technologies with which to track individual migrants and to map the context of their flights (Flack et al. 2023), carries the promise to make us see birds, and our joint world and future, with new eyes. There is work to do.

I thank my research associates at BirdEyes for thinking along and Charles Foster, Rob Bijlsma and Bart Kempenaers for comments on a draft. Helena Wehner of the Waldrapp team also helped with comments and provided the two photographs.

Theunis Piersma

Rudi Drent Chair in Global Flyway Ecology at ‘BirdEyes - Centre for Global Ecological Change’ at the University of Groningen and NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research

References

1.

Aikens E.O., Bontekoe I.D., Blumenstiel L., Schlicksupp A. & Flack A. 2022. Viewing animal migration through a social lens. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37: 985–996. Google Scholar

2.

Aplin L.M. 2019. Culture and cultural evolution in birds: a review of the evidence. Anim. Behav. 147: 179–187. Google Scholar

3.

Aplin L.M., Sheldon B.C. & Morand-Ferron J. 2013. Milk bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the Blue Tit, Cyanistes caeruleus. Anim. Behav. 85: 1225–1232 Google Scholar

4.

Aplin L.M., Farine D.R., Morand-Ferron J., Cockburn A., Thornton A. & Sheldon B.C. 2015. Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature 518: 538–541. Google Scholar

5.

Arrondo E., Sebastián-González E., Moleón M., Morales-Reyes Z., Gil-Sánchez J.M., Cortés-Avizanda A., Ceballos O., Donázar J.A. & Sánchez-Zapata J.A. 2023. Vulture culture: dietary specialization of an obligate scavenger. Proc. R. Soc. B 290: 20221951. Google Scholar

6.

Boogert N.J., Nightingale G.F., Hoppitt W. & Laland K.N. 2014. Perching but not foraging networks predict the spread of novel foraging skills in Starlings. Behav. Proc. 109:135–144. Google Scholar

7.

Byholm P., Beal M., Isaksson N., Lötberg U. & Åkesson S. 2022. Paternal transmission of migration knowledge in a long-distance bird migrant. Nature Comm. 13: 1566. Google Scholar

8.

Byrne R.W., Barnard P.J., Davidson I., Janik V.M., McGrew W.C., Miklósi A. & Wiessner P. 2004. Understanding culture across species. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8: 341–346. Google Scholar

9.

Cohen E.B. & Satterfield D.A. 2020. ‘Chancing on a spectacle:’ co-occurring animal migrations and interspecific interactions. Ecography 43: ecog.04958. Google Scholar

10.

Curio E., Ernst U. & Vieth W. 1978. Cultural transmission of enemy recognition: one function of mobbing. Science 202: 899–901. Google Scholar

11.

Dahlin C.R., Smith-Vidaurre G., Genes M.K. & Wright T.F. 2024. Widespread cultural change in declining populations of Amazon parrots. Proc. R. Soc. B 291: 20240659. Google Scholar

12.

Drenske S., Radchuk V., Scherer C., Esterer C., Kowarik I., Fritz J. & Kramer-Schad S. 2023. On the road to self-sustainability: reintroduced migratory European Northern Bald Ibises Geronticus eremita still need management interventions for population viability. Oryx 57: 637–648. Google Scholar

13.

Emery N.J. & Clayton N.S. 2004. The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306: 1903–1907. Google Scholar

14.

Flack A., Aikens E.O., Kölzsch A., Nourani E., Snell K.R.S., Fiedler W., Linek N., Bauer H.-G., Thorup K., Partecke J., Wikelski W. & Williams H.J. 2022. New frontiers in bird migration research. Curr. Biol. 32: R1187–R1199. Google Scholar

15.

Foster C. 2021. Being a Human. Adventures in 40,000 years of consciousness. Profile Books, London. Google Scholar

16.

Fritz J. 2021. The European LIFE+ Northern Bald Ibis reintroduction project. Oryx 55: 809–810. Google Scholar

17.

Fritz J. & Janák J. 2022. Tracing the fate of the Northern Bald Ibis over five millennia: an interdisciplinary approach to the extinction and recovery of an iconic bird species. Animals 12: 1569. Google Scholar

18.

Fritz J., Kramer R., Hoffmann W., Trobe D. & Unsöld M. 2017. Back into the wild: establishing a migratory Northern Bald Ibis Geronticus eremita population in Europe. Int. Zoo Yearbook 51: 107–123. Google Scholar

19.

Geertz C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New York. Google Scholar

20.

Godfrey-Smith P. 2024. Living on Earth. Life, consciousness and the making of the natural world. Collins, London. Google Scholar

21.

Hansell M. 2007. Built by Animals. The Natural History of Animal Architecture. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

22.

Harrison X.A., Tregenza T., Inger R., Colhoun K., Dawson D.A., Gudmundsson G.A., Hodgson D.J., Horsburgh G.J., McElwaine G. & Bearhop S. 2010. Cultural inheritance drives site fidelity and migratory connectivity in a long-distance migrant. Mol. Ecol. 19: 5484–5496. Google Scholar

23.

Hoppitt W. & Laland K.N. 2013. Social Learning. An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar

24.

Hunt G.R. & Gray R.D. 2006. Tool manufacture by New Caledonian crows: Chipping away at human uniqueness. Acta Zool. Sin. 5: 622–625. Google Scholar

25.

Kölzsch A., Flack A., Müskens G.J.D.M., Kruckenberg H., Glazov P. & Wikelski M. 2020. Goose parents lead migration V. J. Avian Biol. 51: e02392. Google Scholar

26.

Loonstra A.H.J., Verhoeven M.A., Both C. & Piersma T. 2023. Translocation of shorebird siblings shows intraspecific variation in migration routines to arise after fledging. Curr. Biol. 33: 2535–2540. Google Scholar

27.

Martinho-Truswell A. 2022. The parrot in the mirror. How evolving to be like birds made us human. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

28.

Mueller T., O'Hara R.B., Converse S.J., Urbanek R.P. & Fagan W.F. 2013. Social learning of migratory performance. Science 341: 999–1002. Google Scholar

29.

Newton I. 2024. Learning and social influence on bird migration. Ardea 112: 171–199. Google Scholar

30.

Norton-Griffiths M. 1967. Some ecological aspects of the feeding behaviour of the Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus on the Edible Mussel Mytilus edulis. Ibis 109: 412–424. Google Scholar

31.

Olkowicz S., Kocourek M., Lučan R.K., Portes M., Fitch W.T., Herculano-Houzel S. & Němec P. 2016. Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: 7255–7260. Google Scholar

32.

Oudman T., Laland K.N., Ruxton G., Tombre I., Shimmings P. & Prop J. 2020. Young birds switch but old birds lead: how Barnacle Geese adjust migratory habits to environmental change. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7: 502. Google Scholar

33.

Palacín C., Alonso J.C., Alonso J.A., Magaña M. & Martín C.A. 2011. Cultural transmission and flexibility of partial migration patterns in a long-lived bird, the Great Bustard Otis tarda. J. Avian Biol. 42: 301–308. Google Scholar

34.

Papageorgiou D., Christensen C., Gall G.E.C., Klarevas-Irby J.A., Nyaguthii B., Couzin I.D. & Farine D.R. 2019. The multilevel society of a small-brained bird. Curr. Biol. 29: R1120–R1121. Google Scholar

35.

Papageorgiou D. & Farine D.R. 2020a. Group size and composition influence collective movement in a highly social terrestrial bird. Elife 9: e59902. Google Scholar

36.

Papageorgiou D. & Farine D.R. 2020b. Shared decision-making allows subordinates to lead when dominants monopolize resources. Science Adv. 6: eaba5881. Google Scholar

37.

Papageorgiou D., Nyaguthii B. & Farine D.R. 2024. Compromise or choose: shared movement decisions in wild Vulturine Guineafowl. Comm. Biol. 7: 95. Google Scholar

38.

Pegoraro K. & Föger M. 2001. Individuality in the Northern Bald Ibis or Waldrapp Ibis Geronticus eremita—key features for a complex social system. Acrocephalus 22: 73–79. Google Scholar

39.

Portugal S.J., Hubel T.Y., Fritz J., Heese S., Trobe D., Voelkl B., Hailes S., Wilson AM. & Usherwood J.R. 2014. Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight. Nature 505: 399–402. Google Scholar

40.

Prum R.O. 2017. The evolution of beauty: How Darwin's forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world – and us. Doubleday, New York. Google Scholar

41.

Sasaki T. & Biro D. 2017. Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups. Nature Comm. 8: 15049. Google Scholar

42.

Szipl G., Boeckle M., Werner S.A.B. & Kotrschal K. 2014 Mate recognition and expression of affective state in croop calls of Northern Bald Ibis (Geronticus eremita). PLoS ONE 9: e88265. Google Scholar

43.

Skutch A.F. 1992. Origins of nature's beauty. University of Texas Press, Austin. Google Scholar

44.

Slater P.J.B. 1986. The cultural transmission of bird song. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1: 94–97. Google Scholar

45.

Stoyanova Y., Stefanov N. & Donázar J.A. 2010. Twig used as a tool by the Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus). J. Raptor Res. 44: 154–156. Google Scholar

46.

Teitelbaum C.S., Converse S.J. & Mueller T. 2019. The importance of early life experience and animal culture in reintroductions. Conserv. Lett. 12: e12599. Google Scholar

47.

Tello-Ramos M.C., Harper L., Tortora-Brayda I., Guillette L.M., Capilla-Lasheras P., Harrison X.A., Young A.J. & Healy S.D. 2024. Architectural traditions in the structures built by cooperative weaver birds. Science 385: 1004–1009. Google Scholar

48.

van Lawick-Goodall J. & van Lawick-Goodall H. 1966. Use of tools by the Egyptian Vulture, Neophron percnopterus. Nature 212: 1468–1469. Google Scholar

49.

Voelkl B. & Fritz J. 2017. Relation between travel strategy and social organization of migrating birds with special consideration of formation flight in the Northern Bald Ibis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372: 20160235. Google Scholar

50.

Voelkl B., Portugal S.J., Unsöld M., Usherwood J.R., Wilson A.M. & Fritz J. 2015. Matching times of leading and following suggest cooperation through direct reciprocity during V-formation flight in ibis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112: 2115–2120. Google Scholar

51.

Wehner H., Fritz J. & Voelkl B. 2022. Soaring and intermittent flap-gliding during migratory flights of Northern Bald Ibis. J. Ornithol. 163: 671–681. Google Scholar

52.

White D.J. 2004. Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions. Learning & Behav. 32: 105–113. Google Scholar

53.

Wright T.F. 1996. Regional dialects in the contact call of a parrot. Proc. R. Soc. B 263: 867–872. Google Scholar
"Ornithology from the Flatlands," Ardea 112(2), 165-170, (7 November 2024). https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.2024.a15
Published: 7 November 2024
Back to Top