The avifauna on the north bank of the Putumayo River in Colombia is one of the most poorly known in western Amazonia. In February 2017 we spent nine days conducting ornithological field work in and around the community of El Encanto, dpto. Amazonas. We present novel distributional information for six species, the most significant of which concern range extensions for Whiteshouldered Antshrike Thamnophilus aethiops, Imeri Warbling Antbird Hypocnemis flavescens and Black-headed Antbird Percnostola rufifrons minor. We discuss these records in the context of recent ornithological work on the south bank of the Putumayo in Peru and address their biogeographical significance, especially with regards to the definition of areas of endemism in western Amazonia and the role of the Putumayo River as a distributional barrier. Our findings underscore the need for continued ornithological field work in the Putumayo–Caquetá interfluvium and indeed the Colombian Amazon as a whole.
Of all the major rivers in western Amazonia, the Putumayo is arguably the least known ornithologically. Approximately 1,600 km in length, the Putumayo—known as the Içá in Brazil—is the tenth longest tributary of the Amazon (Goulding et al. 2003). Rising in the southern Colombian Andes, it marks the boundary between Colombia and Peru for much of its length; its basin is sparsely populated, and for the most part difficult to access. Several recent surveys by the Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH), Chicago, have shed light on avian distributions immediately south of the Putumayo in Peru (Pitman et al. 2004, Alverson et al. 2008, Gilmore et al. 2010, Pitman et al. 2011, 2013, 2016), but the avifauna on the Colombian side is essentially unknown. Ornithological exploration of the Putumayo–Caquetá interfluvium has commenced only very recently, with much of the field work in the vicinity of Puerto Leguizamo (Bonilla-Castillo et al. 2017); the Colombian side of the Putumayo downstream of Puerto Leguizamo has been almost completely neglected by ornithologists and birders. Here we report on several avian range extensions from a site on the Colombian bank of the Putumayo c.240 km downriver of Puerto Leguizamo, and discuss their biogeographical implications.
Study sites and Methods
On 1–9 February 2017, we undertook ornithological field work around the indigenous Muiri communities of El Encanto (01°44′40″S, 73°12′24″W), San Rafael del Caraparaná (01°41′15″S, 73°13′55″W) and Tercera India (01°42′32″S, 73°13′41″W) in dpto. Amazonas, Colombia. El Encanto is located at the confluence of the Putumayo and Caraparaná Rivers, while San Rafael and Tercera India are both a few kilometres upstream along the Caraparaná. Elevation at all three sites is c.140 m. Rainfall data from Puerto Alegría, c.120 km to the north-west along the Putumayo River, indicates that February is the second wettest month after March, with the driest period in June–August (OEA 1993); we experienced some rain on most days, with several very heavy afternoon downpours. To our knowledge, the only previous bird survey of this area was by J. Beckers in March 2015. We concentrated our efforts on several trails through terra firme forest on clay soils in the vicinity of the three villages; less time was spent in pasture and second growth in the immediate environs of settlements. We walked trails from dawn to early afternoon conducting qualitative observations and attempting to document interesting sightings using digital photography and sound-recordings using an Olympus LS-11 recorder with Sennheiser ME66 microphone.
Results
We recorded a total of 197 species during our field work (Appendix 1). All of our records, including 116 photos of 45 species, are archived in eBird ( www.ebird.org); we documented 40 species with sound-recordings, the more significant of which—nine recordings of seven species—are deposited at www.xeno-canto.org. Major range extensions and other noteworthy records are detailed below, with supporting documentation indicated by its archive number in xeno-canto (XC) or the Macaulay Library (ML). Taxonomy and nomenclature follow Remsen et al. (2018).
PEARL KITE Gampsonyx swainsonii
One photographed on the outskirts of El Encanto on 4 February (ML 59417331). Until very recently, this open-country species was not mapped for the middle Putumayo by major references (Schulenberg et al. 2007, McMullan & Donegan 2014), although more recent works do so (Ayerbe-Quiñones 2018, McMullan 2018). Generally, it is patchily distributed in western Amazonia. The only record from the several expeditions conducted by FMNH to the Peruvian bank of the middle Putumayo is at San Antonio del Estrecho, downstream of El Encanto, on 23 February 2016 (Pitman et al. 2016). Additionally, we observed two north of Puerto Leguizamo on 30 January 2017 (ML 58128771), suggesting this species is regular at low densities in cleared areas near settlements along the middle Putumayo.
COMMON NIGHTHAWK Chordeiles minor
A massive dusk flight over the Caraparaná River at San Rafael on 5 February was conservatively estimated to number 250 individuals (ML 59418331, 59418331, 59418481). Data on the species' winter range are limited (Brigham et al. 2011) and, while it occurs regularly in western Amazonia, this appears to be an exceptionally high count. There are no published counts of more than ten in Ecuador (Freile et al. 2017) and in Loreto, Peru, where the species is known to winter, the only eBird counts in double digits are from October, and presumably refer to migrants. Further north in the Colombian Amazon—where the species was recorded for the first time by Stiles (2010)—counts from the vicinity of Mitú, Vaupés, have reached 50 in January and up to 150 in late February (eBird data), the latter possibly involving early spring migrants. Our count from early February should represent wintering birds and suggests that Common Nighthawks may be more numerous in winter than previously thought in this part of Amazonia. Interestingly, for a species generally associated with open habitats, our record is from a heavily forested area.
GREEN-TAILED GOLDENTHROAT Polytmus theresiae
One photographed (ML 59429851, 59429911, 59429981, 59430021; Fig. 1) on 8 February in open pasture with scattered low shrubs on the outskirts of San Rafael. In Colombia, this species occurs in ‘sandy-belt’ forest edge and savanna in dptos. Vichada, Guainía, Vaupés and Guaviare (McMullan & Donegan 2014); the closest records are from the Serranía de Chiribiquete, dpto. Caquetá, c.215 km to the north (Álvarez et al. 2003) and from Mitú, c.470 km to the north-west. The species is very patchily distributed in northern Amazonian Peru, where it occurs in sand-forest enclaves, with the nearest records from the río Pastaza c.400 km to the south-east (Schulenberg et al. 2007); more recently, a small population was also discovered near San Lorenzo, dpto. Loreto (Schmitt et al. 2017), and along the río Blanco, also in dpto. Loreto (Socolar et al. 2018). The only Ecuadorian record concerns a male and a female collected in 1936 at Laguna de Siguin’, an untraced locality presumed to be on the north bank of the río Pastaza (Ridgely & Greenfield 2001). Its presence in our study area was surprising, as there is no natural savanna anywhere in the vicinity and the only open areas are small man-made pastures in the immediate environs of settlements. We can only speculate as to whether this was a vagrant from elsewhere in Colombia or Peru, or if there is small resident population along the Putumayo. It has recently been suggested that the species' patchy distribution in western Amazonia is a result of contemporary connectivity between populations, rather than relictual distribution (Socolar et al. 2018) and our record from a tiny patch of suitable habitat appears to support this argument.
WHITE-SHOULDERED ANTSHRIKE Thamnophilus aethiops
One heard singing in terra firme forest near El Encanto on 3 February, and at least three were seen, photographed (male ML 49753351; female ML 49753331, 49753341; Fig. 2) and soundrecorded (XC 357343) in a treefall gap in terra firme forest near Tercera India on 7 February. T. aethiops is polytypic and a recent genetic study recovered nine reciprocally monophyletic lineages equating to evolutionary species, but not fully matching current subspecies limits (Thom & Aleixo 2015). Our records are from an area where T. aethiops was not previously known, and as such their taxonomic affiliation is of special interest. Four different subspecies occur within 500 km of El Encanto. Race kapouni, which is unknown north of the Amazon, occurs as close as c.210 km south of El Encanto on the south bank of the Amazon opposite the mouth of the Napo River (Robbins et al. 1991). North of the Amazon, the closest records of T. aethiops to our study site are from the Serranía de Chiribiquete c.215 km to the north (Álvarez et al. 2003). Examination of these specimens by J. E. Avendaño (in litt. 2018) suggests they best match the poorly known race wetmorei, for which the nearest otherwise confirmed records to our study site are from the foothills of the Serranía de los Churumbelos, dpto. Cauca, c.450 km to the north-west (Salaman et al. 1999). Records from the Zona Reservada Pucaruro, dpto. Loreto, Peru (Diaz-Alván et al. 2017) approximately 265 km to the west-southwest, and Yasuní National Park, Orellana province, Ecuador (XC86523) c.375 km west-southwest, have been assigned to the nominate race, of which the closest specimen records are from Santa Cecilia, Sucumbíos province, Ecuador, c.460 km west-northwest of our study site (Ridgely & Greenfield 2001). The status of the nominate race in Colombia is somewhat confused, as Hilty & Brown (1986) reported it to occur in south-eastern dpto. Nariño, and it was included in a recent effort to list all bird taxa known from Colombia (Verhelst-Montenegro & Salaman 2015)—presumably based on Meyer de Schauensee (1952), who reported two males and a female collected along the San Miguel and Churuyacu Rivers in extreme south-east Nariño, c.510 km west-northwest of our study site—yet it is not listed by recent field guides (McMullan & Donegan 2014, Ayerbe-Quiñones 2018, McMullan 2018) and taxonomic references (del Hoyo & Collar 2016), perhaps due to the earlier reference being overlooked. There are also records of T. aethiops from Estación Biológica Caparú, dpto. Vaupés, approximately 415 km to the east-northeast (Bennet-Defler 1994); the race concerned is unknown but is presumed—on range—to be polionotus, the closest confirmed records of which come from the lowermost Caquetá / Japurá River in Brazil, c.800 km east of our study site (Thom & Aleixo 2015). Assigning our records to race is problematic without specimens. Plumage perhaps best matches polionotus: the female was essentially uniformly rufous, whereas in female wetmorei the mantle should be much paler, which makes the rufous cap stand out more clearly from the rest of the upper parts’ (Meyer de Schauensee 1945); the male was rather uniformly blackish grey, with a darker crown and white spots on the wing-coverts, coincident with polionotus / wetmorei, and should rule out the nominate race, which is mostly black. However, we cannot eliminate wetmorei and, given how distant our records are from other known localities, the possibility of an undescribed subspecies also cannot be discarded (A. Aleixo in litt. 2018). In Peru, T. aethiops is unknown north of the Amazon and it has not been recorded on any of the rapid biological inventories conducted between the Napo and Putumayo Rivers. Given that in the T. aethiops complex, all splits involving the recognized lineages coincide with at least part of the course of a major Amazonian river’ (Thom & Aleixo 2015), it might be speculated that the Putumayo River is also one such barrier.
IMERI WARBLING ANTBIRD Hypocnemis flavescens
Common at San Rafael, with 1–6 recorded daily, but rarer at El Encanto, where just one was recorded, on 9 February. Found near large treefall gaps and at forest edge. Identification was based on sound-recordings of the loudsong (XC 357330; Fig. 5, note how the initial notes lack tails’ and the terminal notes become sharply downslurred; compare with XC 72568 in Fig. 7; see Isler et al. 2007) and plumage (ML 49756121, 49756131; whitish breast with sparse and ill-defined black streaks vs. coarser markings on Peruvian Warbling Antbird H. peruviana, and black lateral crown-stripe heavily flecked white vs. more solid black in H. peruviana). The distributional limits of H. flavescens and H. peruviana are poorly known: the nearest published records of H. flavescens are from Chiribiquete National Park, dpto. Caquetá, c.150 km to the north-northwest (Stiles et al. 1995, Isler et al. 2007); closer to our study site, there is an unpublished specimen record from north of La Chorrera, dpto. Amazonas, c.65 km north-east of El Encanto (IavH-A 1526; J. E. Avendaño in litt. 2018). On the other hand, H. peruviana is mapped as occurring throughout the Putumayo–Caquetá interfluvium in McMullan & Donegan (2014), but our records suggest this is erroneous. Directly across the Putumayo from our study area, the FMNH surveys found H. peruviana at most sites sampled, with the closest records just 30 km from ours along the lower Ere River, but failed to record H. flavescens (Pitman et al. 2013). Our discovery of H. flavescens at El Encanto prompted us to review our previous records of the H. cantator complex from the Putumayo River. During 11 days of field work in and around Puerto Leguizamo in 2016 (29 January–5 February; OJ, J. Beckers & F. Peña) and 2017 (29–31 January; OJ, AC, MV & F. Peña), we did not record any member of the H. cantator complex between the Putumayo and Caquetá Rivers. However, on the north bank of the Caquetá we recorded eight Hypocnemis on 31 January 2016 (c.00°02′N, 74°38′W). Based on sound-recordings, these were H. flavescens, c.220 km west-northwest of the nearest known records from Chiribiquete National Park, and the westernmost records to date. The closest documented records of H. peruviana north of the Putumayo River known to us are from La Providencia, on the Orteguaza River, in dpto. Caquetá (Lafrancesco et al. 1987) approximately 110 km to the north-west, and the Puerto Asís area c.190 km west-northwest of Puerto Leguízamo (eBird; ML 50567251, D. R. López). Further field work is required to determine if and where H. flavescens and H. peruviana are in contact; any such area would lie in the stretch of lowland forest that extends between the Puerto Leguízamo / La Tagua area and Puerto Asís, which remains essentially unexplored by ornithologists. Additionally, field work on the Peruvian bank of the Putumayo opposite Puerto Leguízamo should focus on clarifying which member of the H. cantator complex occurs there, as records by OJ, J. Beckers & F. Peña in February 2016 and by D. Calderón-Franco et al. in March 2017 are not supported by sound-recordings and cannot be identified to species.
BLACK-HEADED ANTBIRD Percnostola rufifrons minor
This species, first recorded by J. Beckers in March 2015, was fairly common in the area, with 1–5 encountered daily at all three sites. As the area between the Putumayo and Caquetá Rivers lacked any records of P. rufifrons, our finding raises questions as to which taxon of the species occurs there. While P. r. jensoni is fairly widespread on the south bank of the Putumayo in Peru, including just 30 km south of our study site along the lower Ere River (Pitman et al. 2013), the nearest published records of minor appear to be from Chiribiquete National Park, Caquetá, c.250 km north-east (Álvarez et al. 2003) and Estación Biológica Caparú, Vaupés, 415 km to the east-northeast (Isler et al. 2001); closer to our study site are two unpublished specimens from La Chorrera (IavH-A 1563, 5756; J. E. Avendaño in litt. 2018). We sound-recorded several individuals (XC 357329, 357334 and 357339; Fig. 6) and photographed a male (ML 49753111; Fig. 3) and female (ML 49752771, 49752761), which we identified as race minor based on plumage (dark reddish-brown crown and ferruginous head-sides in the female vs. blackish-grey crown and greyish head-sides in jensoni) and vocal features (song slower paced than in jensoni; the loudsong pace in our recordings—3.03–3.52 notes / second—matches and in one case slightly exceeds the pace of loudsong reported in Isler et al. 2001 for minor—2.67–3.31 notes / second—while they are well outside that reported for jensoni—4.09–4.50 notes / second; M. L. Isler in litt. 2018; compare our recording in Fig. 6 to XC 56750 in Fig. 8). Our findings confirm the suggestion by Capparella et al. (1997) that the Putumayo / Içá River separates these two taxa. Genetic work on species limits in the P. rufifrons complex is ongoing (G. A. Bravo in litt. 2017) and our findings shed light on the geographic limits of these taxa. Interestingly, the birds responded strongly to playback of the song of P. r. jensoni from Loreto, Peru (XC 56750), albeit during unstructured playback experiments and with the caveat that assessing lack of response is likely to be more taxonomically significant. More formal playback trials along the lines of those conducted for other allopatric, closely related taxa in the Neotropics (Freeman & Montgomery 2017) and including calls, could provide additional data by which to assess the taxonomic rank of these two taxa.
Discussion
Although our survey was brief, our findings add to the limited but growing body of data on the birds of the Putumayo basin. Previous surveys have concentrated on the Peruvian side of the river, and our records highlight some interesting similarities and differences between the avifaunas on the north and south banks. One similarity is the presence of a suite of birds associated with poor-soil habitats: in addition to Polytmus theresiae and Percnostola rufifrons, other poor-soil specialists we found included Pearly Antshrike Megastictus margaritatus (ML 58147011, XC 357335), Cinnamon Manakin-Tyrant Neopipo cinnamomea (ML 59871381, 59871431, 59871491, 59871511; Fig. 4) and Citron-bellied Attila Attila citriniventris, despite the absence of white-sand formations. Several poor-soil specialists were also found at some of the FMNH study sites south of the Putumayo, suggesting that such species are widespread in the basin.
Perhaps more interestingly, our findings evidence that the Putumayo River is a biogeographic barrier. Although the role of rivers in shaping the distribution and speciation of Amazonian fauna has long been known (Wallace 1852) and extensively studied (Haffer 1969, Weir et al. 2015), the role of the Putumayo has received virtually no attention in the ornithological literature, despite evidence that some vertebrates, such as Red Titi Monkey Callicebus discolor, are bound by it (van Roosmalen et al. 2002). Our data begin to address this gap: we found that Hypocnemis flavescens and H. peruviana replace one another across the Putumayo, contrary to published maps, and confirmed the suspicion that the Putumayo also separates Percnostola rufifrons minor and P. r. jensoni. The lack of records of Thamnophilus aethiops from the Peruvian side of the Putumayo despite a number of surveys there strongly suggests that the river serves as a barrier also to this taxon. Several species not yet recorded in Colombia—including an undescribed antwren Herpsilochmus sp., Variegated Antpitta Grallaria varia and Orange-crowned Manakin Heterocercus aurantiivertex—have recently been found across the Putumayo in Peru (Pitman et al. 2004, Gilmore et al. 2010, Pitman et al. 2011), but ornithological field work on the Colombian side of the river—and indeed in the Colombian Amazon as a whole (Avendaño et al. 2017)—has been so limited that it is difficult to gauge whether the lack of records provides additional evidence of the Putumayo's role as a barrier, or is merely due to these species remaining undetected to date.
The role of rivers in defining areas of bird endemism in the Amazon basin is also under debate (Naka et al. 2010, Fernandes et al. 2014), with a recent review finding that rivers mark steep changes in species composition, but do not limit areas of endemism’ (Oliveira et al. 2017). Traditionally, the Putumayo basin has been thought to belong to the North Amazon / Napo centre of endemism (Cracraft 1985), with the Negro / Vaupés River generally mapped as separating it from the Imeri centre to the north (Silva et al. 2005, Naka et al. 2012, Oliveira et al. 2017). However, several taxa we found at our study site— especially Hypocnemis flavescens and Percnostola rufifrons minor, and potentially Thamnophilus aethiops if racial assignment to polionotus is confirmed—are limited to the Imeri centre of endemism, and in the latter two cases they replace sister taxa from the Napo centre across the Putumayo. On the other hand, the only Rhegmatorhina we found at our study site was Hairy-crested Antbird R. melanosticta (XC 357344), whose range encompasses the Napo centre of endemism, and not the Imeri centre representative, Chestnut-crested Antbird R. cristata, for which species the Caquetá / Japurá River was recently confirmed as a distributional limit (Ribas et al. 2018). Our records of Selenidera toucanets were heard only, and we could not determine if they referred to Golden-collared Toucanet S. reinwardtii or the Imeri endemic Tawny-tufted Toucanet S. nattereri. The picture that emerges is of the area between the Putumayo and Vaupés Rivers being a zone of transition between the Napo and Imeri centres of endemism, with taxa typical of the latter having been found well to the south-west of the centre as traditionally defined, even beyond the geological boundaries of the Guiana Shield (Osmonson et al. 2000). Similar transitional areas have been found, for example, in the Branco / Negro interfluvium in Brazil, where two distinct avifaunas from west of the Negro and east of the Branco meet (Naka et al. 2010). Recent records of Yellow-throated Antwren Myrmotherula ambigua and Rose-breasted Chat Granatellus pelzelni from the Puerto Leguízamo area (D. Calderón-Franco et al. in prep.) further underscore the Guianan / Imeri flavour’ to the avifauna on the Colombian bank of the Putumayo, and hint at the complexity of distributional patterns in the poorly explored Colombian Amazon.
Additional field work on the Colombian side of the Putumayo is certain to provide useful data to further unravel these patterns, and to address distributional questions at a finer scale, including the extent to which the Caquetá River, which runs almost parallel to the Putumayo to the north and is even longer (c.2,800 km, making it the fourth-largest tributary of the Amazon, Goulding et al. 2003), also constitutes a biogeographical barrier. Genetic studies of avian populations either side of the Putumayo would also shed light on the river's role as a barrier, especially given increasing awareness of cryptic diversity in Amazonian birds (Whitney & Cohn-Haft 2013), and of the fine-scale nature of endemism in Amazonia (Fernandes 2013). Recent field work on the Colombian side of the Putumayo has already resulted in one new species for the national list—Cocha Antshrike Thamnophilus praecox (Williams 2016, Janni et al. in prep.)—and more such discoveries surely await. Of the species mentioned above as occurring on the Peruvian side of the Putumayo, Heterocercus aurantiivertex seems especially likely to occur in Colombia as well, as its range is very similar to that of Thamnophilus praecox. One obstacle to field work along the Colombian Putumayo is difficulty of access: the area downstream of Puerto Asís lacks roads and transport is by boat along the main waterways, with Puerto Leguízamo the only town easily accessed by air. From the latter, a weekly boat visits San Antonio del Estrecho on the Peruvian bank, a journey of c.12 hours; El Encanto is about three-quarters of the way downstream and is one of the few settlements where some accommodation can be secured. The small settlement of La Chorrera, c.55 km north-east of our study site, is reached by a weekly flight from Leticia, and could also serve as a base for exploration. In part due to these logistical challenges, the Colombian part of the Putumayo basin is one of the frontiers of Amazonian ornithology, and we strongly encourage its continued exploration.
Acknowledgements
First and foremost, we thank the indigenous communities of El Encanto, San Rafael del Caraparaná and Tercera India for permitting access to their communal lands. Jurgen Beckers drew our attention to the El Encanto area, encouraged us to survey it and provided much-appreciated logistical information from his visit in 2015; his records are archived in eBird. Morton L. Isler kindly examined our sound-recordings of antbirds from El Encanto, provided valuable input on their identification, and improved our understanding of the distribution of several taxa discussed herein. Alexandre Aleixo and Gustavo Bravo provided insights on Thamnophilus aethiops and Percnostola rufifrons, respectively. Diego Calderón-Franco shared some records from a visit to the Puerto Leguízamo area in 2017. AC thanks Leica Sports Optics for the loan of optical equipment.