Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
24 September 2018 Range extensions for White-shouldered Antshrike Thamnophilus aethiops, Imeri Warbling Antbird Hypocnemis flavescens and Black-headed Antbird Percnostola rufifrons along the Putumayo River in Colombia, and their biogeographical significance
Ottavio Janni, Andrea Corso, Michele Viganò
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The avifauna on the north bank of the Putumayo River in Colombia is one of the most poorly known in western Amazonia. In February 2017 we spent nine days conducting ornithological field work in and around the community of El Encanto, dpto. Amazonas. We present novel distributional information for six species, the most significant of which concern range extensions for Whiteshouldered Antshrike Thamnophilus aethiops, Imeri Warbling Antbird Hypocnemis flavescens and Black-headed Antbird Percnostola rufifrons minor. We discuss these records in the context of recent ornithological work on the south bank of the Putumayo in Peru and address their biogeographical significance, especially with regards to the definition of areas of endemism in western Amazonia and the role of the Putumayo River as a distributional barrier. Our findings underscore the need for continued ornithological field work in the Putumayo–Caquetá interfluvium and indeed the Colombian Amazon as a whole.

Of all the major rivers in western Amazonia, the Putumayo is arguably the least known ornithologically. Approximately 1,600 km in length, the Putumayo—known as the Içá in Brazil—is the tenth longest tributary of the Amazon (Goulding et al. 2003). Rising in the southern Colombian Andes, it marks the boundary between Colombia and Peru for much of its length; its basin is sparsely populated, and for the most part difficult to access. Several recent surveys by the Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH), Chicago, have shed light on avian distributions immediately south of the Putumayo in Peru (Pitman et al. 2004, Alverson et al. 2008, Gilmore et al. 2010, Pitman et al. 2011, 2013, 2016), but the avifauna on the Colombian side is essentially unknown. Ornithological exploration of the Putumayo–Caquetá interfluvium has commenced only very recently, with much of the field work in the vicinity of Puerto Leguizamo (Bonilla-Castillo et al. 2017); the Colombian side of the Putumayo downstream of Puerto Leguizamo has been almost completely neglected by ornithologists and birders. Here we report on several avian range extensions from a site on the Colombian bank of the Putumayo c.240 km downriver of Puerto Leguizamo, and discuss their biogeographical implications.

Study sites and Methods

On 1–9 February 2017, we undertook ornithological field work around the indigenous Muiri communities of El Encanto (01°44′40″S, 73°12′24″W), San Rafael del Caraparaná (01°41′15″S, 73°13′55″W) and Tercera India (01°42′32″S, 73°13′41″W) in dpto. Amazonas, Colombia. El Encanto is located at the confluence of the Putumayo and Caraparaná Rivers, while San Rafael and Tercera India are both a few kilometres upstream along the Caraparaná. Elevation at all three sites is c.140 m. Rainfall data from Puerto Alegría, c.120 km to the north-west along the Putumayo River, indicates that February is the second wettest month after March, with the driest period in June–August (OEA 1993); we experienced some rain on most days, with several very heavy afternoon downpours. To our knowledge, the only previous bird survey of this area was by J. Beckers in March 2015. We concentrated our efforts on several trails through terra firme forest on clay soils in the vicinity of the three villages; less time was spent in pasture and second growth in the immediate environs of settlements. We walked trails from dawn to early afternoon conducting qualitative observations and attempting to document interesting sightings using digital photography and sound-recordings using an Olympus LS-11 recorder with Sennheiser ME66 microphone.

Results

We recorded a total of 197 species during our field work (Appendix 1). All of our records, including 116 photos of 45 species, are archived in eBird ( www.ebird.org); we documented 40 species with sound-recordings, the more significant of which—nine recordings of seven species—are deposited at  www.xeno-canto.org. Major range extensions and other noteworthy records are detailed below, with supporting documentation indicated by its archive number in xeno-canto (XC) or the Macaulay Library (ML). Taxonomy and nomenclature follow Remsen et al. (2018).

PEARL KITE Gampsonyx swainsonii

One photographed on the outskirts of El Encanto on 4 February (ML 59417331). Until very recently, this open-country species was not mapped for the middle Putumayo by major references (Schulenberg et al. 2007, McMullan & Donegan 2014), although more recent works do so (Ayerbe-Quiñones 2018, McMullan 2018). Generally, it is patchily distributed in western Amazonia. The only record from the several expeditions conducted by FMNH to the Peruvian bank of the middle Putumayo is at San Antonio del Estrecho, downstream of El Encanto, on 23 February 2016 (Pitman et al. 2016). Additionally, we observed two north of Puerto Leguizamo on 30 January 2017 (ML 58128771), suggesting this species is regular at low densities in cleared areas near settlements along the middle Putumayo.

COMMON NIGHTHAWK Chordeiles minor

A massive dusk flight over the Caraparaná River at San Rafael on 5 February was conservatively estimated to number 250 individuals (ML 59418331, 59418331, 59418481). Data on the species' winter range are limited (Brigham et al. 2011) and, while it occurs regularly in western Amazonia, this appears to be an exceptionally high count. There are no published counts of more than ten in Ecuador (Freile et al. 2017) and in Loreto, Peru, where the species is known to winter, the only eBird counts in double digits are from October, and presumably refer to migrants. Further north in the Colombian Amazon—where the species was recorded for the first time by Stiles (2010)—counts from the vicinity of Mitú, Vaupés, have reached 50 in January and up to 150 in late February (eBird data), the latter possibly involving early spring migrants. Our count from early February should represent wintering birds and suggests that Common Nighthawks may be more numerous in winter than previously thought in this part of Amazonia. Interestingly, for a species generally associated with open habitats, our record is from a heavily forested area.

Figure 1.

Green-tailed Goldenthroat Polytmus theresiae, San Rafael del Caraparaná, Amazonas, Colombia, 8 February 2017 (Ottavio Janni)

f01_244.jpg

GREEN-TAILED GOLDENTHROAT Polytmus theresiae

One photographed (ML 59429851, 59429911, 59429981, 59430021; Fig. 1) on 8 February in open pasture with scattered low shrubs on the outskirts of San Rafael. In Colombia, this species occurs in ‘sandy-belt’ forest edge and savanna in dptos. Vichada, Guainía, Vaupés and Guaviare (McMullan & Donegan 2014); the closest records are from the Serranía de Chiribiquete, dpto. Caquetá, c.215 km to the north (Álvarez et al. 2003) and from Mitú, c.470 km to the north-west. The species is very patchily distributed in northern Amazonian Peru, where it occurs in sand-forest enclaves, with the nearest records from the río Pastaza c.400 km to the south-east (Schulenberg et al. 2007); more recently, a small population was also discovered near San Lorenzo, dpto. Loreto (Schmitt et al. 2017), and along the río Blanco, also in dpto. Loreto (Socolar et al. 2018). The only Ecuadorian record concerns a male and a female collected in 1936 at Laguna de Siguin’, an untraced locality presumed to be on the north bank of the río Pastaza (Ridgely & Greenfield 2001). Its presence in our study area was surprising, as there is no natural savanna anywhere in the vicinity and the only open areas are small man-made pastures in the immediate environs of settlements. We can only speculate as to whether this was a vagrant from elsewhere in Colombia or Peru, or if there is small resident population along the Putumayo. It has recently been suggested that the species' patchy distribution in western Amazonia is a result of contemporary connectivity between populations, rather than relictual distribution (Socolar et al. 2018) and our record from a tiny patch of suitable habitat appears to support this argument.

WHITE-SHOULDERED ANTSHRIKE Thamnophilus aethiops

One heard singing in terra firme forest near El Encanto on 3 February, and at least three were seen, photographed (male ML 49753351; female ML 49753331, 49753341; Fig. 2) and soundrecorded (XC 357343) in a treefall gap in terra firme forest near Tercera India on 7 February. T. aethiops is polytypic and a recent genetic study recovered nine reciprocally monophyletic lineages equating to evolutionary species, but not fully matching current subspecies limits (Thom & Aleixo 2015). Our records are from an area where T. aethiops was not previously known, and as such their taxonomic affiliation is of special interest. Four different subspecies occur within 500 km of El Encanto. Race kapouni, which is unknown north of the Amazon, occurs as close as c.210 km south of El Encanto on the south bank of the Amazon opposite the mouth of the Napo River (Robbins et al. 1991). North of the Amazon, the closest records of T. aethiops to our study site are from the Serranía de Chiribiquete c.215 km to the north (Álvarez et al. 2003). Examination of these specimens by J. E. Avendaño (in litt. 2018) suggests they best match the poorly known race wetmorei, for which the nearest otherwise confirmed records to our study site are from the foothills of the Serranía de los Churumbelos, dpto. Cauca, c.450 km to the north-west (Salaman et al. 1999). Records from the Zona Reservada Pucaruro, dpto. Loreto, Peru (Diaz-Alván et al. 2017) approximately 265 km to the west-southwest, and Yasuní National Park, Orellana province, Ecuador (XC86523) c.375 km west-southwest, have been assigned to the nominate race, of which the closest specimen records are from Santa Cecilia, Sucumbíos province, Ecuador, c.460 km west-northwest of our study site (Ridgely & Greenfield 2001). The status of the nominate race in Colombia is somewhat confused, as Hilty & Brown (1986) reported it to occur in south-eastern dpto. Nariño, and it was included in a recent effort to list all bird taxa known from Colombia (Verhelst-Montenegro & Salaman 2015)—presumably based on Meyer de Schauensee (1952), who reported two males and a female collected along the San Miguel and Churuyacu Rivers in extreme south-east Nariño, c.510 km west-northwest of our study site—yet it is not listed by recent field guides (McMullan & Donegan 2014, Ayerbe-Quiñones 2018, McMullan 2018) and taxonomic references (del Hoyo & Collar 2016), perhaps due to the earlier reference being overlooked. There are also records of T. aethiops from Estación Biológica Caparú, dpto. Vaupés, approximately 415 km to the east-northeast (Bennet-Defler 1994); the race concerned is unknown but is presumed—on range—to be polionotus, the closest confirmed records of which come from the lowermost Caquetá / Japurá River in Brazil, c.800 km east of our study site (Thom & Aleixo 2015). Assigning our records to race is problematic without specimens. Plumage perhaps best matches polionotus: the female was essentially uniformly rufous, whereas in female wetmorei the mantle should be much paler, which makes the rufous cap stand out more clearly from the rest of the upper parts’ (Meyer de Schauensee 1945); the male was rather uniformly blackish grey, with a darker crown and white spots on the wing-coverts, coincident with polionotus / wetmorei, and should rule out the nominate race, which is mostly black. However, we cannot eliminate wetmorei and, given how distant our records are from other known localities, the possibility of an undescribed subspecies also cannot be discarded (A. Aleixo in litt. 2018). In Peru, T. aethiops is unknown north of the Amazon and it has not been recorded on any of the rapid biological inventories conducted between the Napo and Putumayo Rivers. Given that in the T. aethiops complex, all splits involving the recognized lineages coincide with at least part of the course of a major Amazonian river’ (Thom & Aleixo 2015), it might be speculated that the Putumayo River is also one such barrier.

Figure 2.

Female White-shouldered Antshrike Thamnophilus aethiops, Tercera India, Amazonas, Colombia, 7 February 2017 (Ottavio Janni)

f02_244.jpg

IMERI WARBLING ANTBIRD Hypocnemis flavescens

Common at San Rafael, with 1–6 recorded daily, but rarer at El Encanto, where just one was recorded, on 9 February. Found near large treefall gaps and at forest edge. Identification was based on sound-recordings of the loudsong (XC 357330; Fig. 5, note how the initial notes lack tails’ and the terminal notes become sharply downslurred; compare with XC 72568 in Fig. 7; see Isler et al. 2007) and plumage (ML 49756121, 49756131; whitish breast with sparse and ill-defined black streaks vs. coarser markings on Peruvian Warbling Antbird H. peruviana, and black lateral crown-stripe heavily flecked white vs. more solid black in H. peruviana). The distributional limits of H. flavescens and H. peruviana are poorly known: the nearest published records of H. flavescens are from Chiribiquete National Park, dpto. Caquetá, c.150 km to the north-northwest (Stiles et al. 1995, Isler et al. 2007); closer to our study site, there is an unpublished specimen record from north of La Chorrera, dpto. Amazonas, c.65 km north-east of El Encanto (IavH-A 1526; J. E. Avendaño in litt. 2018). On the other hand, H. peruviana is mapped as occurring throughout the Putumayo–Caquetá interfluvium in McMullan & Donegan (2014), but our records suggest this is erroneous. Directly across the Putumayo from our study area, the FMNH surveys found H. peruviana at most sites sampled, with the closest records just 30 km from ours along the lower Ere River, but failed to record H. flavescens (Pitman et al. 2013). Our discovery of H. flavescens at El Encanto prompted us to review our previous records of the H. cantator complex from the Putumayo River. During 11 days of field work in and around Puerto Leguizamo in 2016 (29 January–5 February; OJ, J. Beckers & F. Peña) and 2017 (29–31 January; OJ, AC, MV & F. Peña), we did not record any member of the H. cantator complex between the Putumayo and Caquetá Rivers. However, on the north bank of the Caquetá we recorded eight Hypocnemis on 31 January 2016 (c.00°02′N, 74°38′W). Based on sound-recordings, these were H. flavescens, c.220 km west-northwest of the nearest known records from Chiribiquete National Park, and the westernmost records to date. The closest documented records of H. peruviana north of the Putumayo River known to us are from La Providencia, on the Orteguaza River, in dpto. Caquetá (Lafrancesco et al. 1987) approximately 110 km to the north-west, and the Puerto Asís area c.190 km west-northwest of Puerto Leguízamo (eBird; ML 50567251, D. R. López). Further field work is required to determine if and where H. flavescens and H. peruviana are in contact; any such area would lie in the stretch of lowland forest that extends between the Puerto Leguízamo / La Tagua area and Puerto Asís, which remains essentially unexplored by ornithologists. Additionally, field work on the Peruvian bank of the Putumayo opposite Puerto Leguízamo should focus on clarifying which member of the H. cantator complex occurs there, as records by OJ, J. Beckers & F. Peña in February 2016 and by D. Calderón-Franco et al. in March 2017 are not supported by sound-recordings and cannot be identified to species.

BLACK-HEADED ANTBIRD Percnostola rufifrons minor

This species, first recorded by J. Beckers in March 2015, was fairly common in the area, with 1–5 encountered daily at all three sites. As the area between the Putumayo and Caquetá Rivers lacked any records of P. rufifrons, our finding raises questions as to which taxon of the species occurs there. While P. r. jensoni is fairly widespread on the south bank of the Putumayo in Peru, including just 30 km south of our study site along the lower Ere River (Pitman et al. 2013), the nearest published records of minor appear to be from Chiribiquete National Park, Caquetá, c.250 km north-east (Álvarez et al. 2003) and Estación Biológica Caparú, Vaupés, 415 km to the east-northeast (Isler et al. 2001); closer to our study site are two unpublished specimens from La Chorrera (IavH-A 1563, 5756; J. E. Avendaño in litt. 2018). We sound-recorded several individuals (XC 357329, 357334 and 357339; Fig. 6) and photographed a male (ML 49753111; Fig. 3) and female (ML 49752771, 49752761), which we identified as race minor based on plumage (dark reddish-brown crown and ferruginous head-sides in the female vs. blackish-grey crown and greyish head-sides in jensoni) and vocal features (song slower paced than in jensoni; the loudsong pace in our recordings—3.03–3.52 notes / second—matches and in one case slightly exceeds the pace of loudsong reported in Isler et al. 2001 for minor—2.67–3.31 notes / second—while they are well outside that reported for jensoni—4.09–4.50 notes / second; M. L. Isler in litt. 2018; compare our recording in Fig. 6 to XC 56750 in Fig. 8). Our findings confirm the suggestion by Capparella et al. (1997) that the Putumayo / Içá River separates these two taxa. Genetic work on species limits in the P. rufifrons complex is ongoing (G. A. Bravo in litt. 2017) and our findings shed light on the geographic limits of these taxa. Interestingly, the birds responded strongly to playback of the song of P. r. jensoni from Loreto, Peru (XC 56750), albeit during unstructured playback experiments and with the caveat that assessing lack of response is likely to be more taxonomically significant. More formal playback trials along the lines of those conducted for other allopatric, closely related taxa in the Neotropics (Freeman & Montgomery 2017) and including calls, could provide additional data by which to assess the taxonomic rank of these two taxa.

Figure 3.

Male Black-headed Antbird Percnostola rufifrons minor, El Encanto, Amazonas, 4 February 2017 (Ottavio Janni)

f03_244.jpg

Discussion

Although our survey was brief, our findings add to the limited but growing body of data on the birds of the Putumayo basin. Previous surveys have concentrated on the Peruvian side of the river, and our records highlight some interesting similarities and differences between the avifaunas on the north and south banks. One similarity is the presence of a suite of birds associated with poor-soil habitats: in addition to Polytmus theresiae and Percnostola rufifrons, other poor-soil specialists we found included Pearly Antshrike Megastictus margaritatus (ML 58147011, XC 357335), Cinnamon Manakin-Tyrant Neopipo cinnamomea (ML 59871381, 59871431, 59871491, 59871511; Fig. 4) and Citron-bellied Attila Attila citriniventris, despite the absence of white-sand formations. Several poor-soil specialists were also found at some of the FMNH study sites south of the Putumayo, suggesting that such species are widespread in the basin.

Figure 4.

Cinnamon Manakin-Tyrant Neopipo cinnamomea, Tercera India, Amazonas, Colombia, 7 February 2017 (Ottavio Janni)

f04_244.jpg

Figure 5.

Imeri Warbling Antbird Hypocnemis flavescens loudsong, recorded at San Rafael del Caraparaná, Amazonas, Colombia, on 9 February 2017; sonogram produced by Michele Viganò from recording XC 357330 ( www.xeno-canto.org) by Ottavio Janni.

f05_244.jpg

Figure 6.

Black-headed Antbird Percnostola rufifrons minor loudsong, recorded at San Rafael del Caraparaná, Amazonas, Colombia, on 6 February 2017; sonogram produced by Michele Viganò from recording XC 357334 ( www.xeno-canto.org) by Ottavio Janni.

f06_244.jpg

Figure 7.

Peruvian Warbling-Antbird Hypocnemis peruviana loudsong, recorded at El Para, Napo, Ecuador, on 24 January 2011; sonogram produced by Michele Viganò from recording XC 72568 ( www.xeno-canto.org) by Andrew Spencer.

f07_244.jpg

Figure 8.

Black-headed Antbird Percnostola rufifrons jensoni loudsong, recorded at Otorongo Lodge, Loreto, Peru, on 27 May 2010; sonogram produced by Michele Viganò from recording XC 56750 ( www. xeno-canto.org) by David Geale.

f08_244.jpg

Perhaps more interestingly, our findings evidence that the Putumayo River is a biogeographic barrier. Although the role of rivers in shaping the distribution and speciation of Amazonian fauna has long been known (Wallace 1852) and extensively studied (Haffer 1969, Weir et al. 2015), the role of the Putumayo has received virtually no attention in the ornithological literature, despite evidence that some vertebrates, such as Red Titi Monkey Callicebus discolor, are bound by it (van Roosmalen et al. 2002). Our data begin to address this gap: we found that Hypocnemis flavescens and H. peruviana replace one another across the Putumayo, contrary to published maps, and confirmed the suspicion that the Putumayo also separates Percnostola rufifrons minor and P. r. jensoni. The lack of records of Thamnophilus aethiops from the Peruvian side of the Putumayo despite a number of surveys there strongly suggests that the river serves as a barrier also to this taxon. Several species not yet recorded in Colombia—including an undescribed antwren Herpsilochmus sp., Variegated Antpitta Grallaria varia and Orange-crowned Manakin Heterocercus aurantiivertex—have recently been found across the Putumayo in Peru (Pitman et al. 2004, Gilmore et al. 2010, Pitman et al. 2011), but ornithological field work on the Colombian side of the river—and indeed in the Colombian Amazon as a whole (Avendaño et al. 2017)—has been so limited that it is difficult to gauge whether the lack of records provides additional evidence of the Putumayo's role as a barrier, or is merely due to these species remaining undetected to date.

The role of rivers in defining areas of bird endemism in the Amazon basin is also under debate (Naka et al. 2010, Fernandes et al. 2014), with a recent review finding that rivers mark steep changes in species composition, but do not limit areas of endemism’ (Oliveira et al. 2017). Traditionally, the Putumayo basin has been thought to belong to the North Amazon / Napo centre of endemism (Cracraft 1985), with the Negro / Vaupés River generally mapped as separating it from the Imeri centre to the north (Silva et al. 2005, Naka et al. 2012, Oliveira et al. 2017). However, several taxa we found at our study site— especially Hypocnemis flavescens and Percnostola rufifrons minor, and potentially Thamnophilus aethiops if racial assignment to polionotus is confirmed—are limited to the Imeri centre of endemism, and in the latter two cases they replace sister taxa from the Napo centre across the Putumayo. On the other hand, the only Rhegmatorhina we found at our study site was Hairy-crested Antbird R. melanosticta (XC 357344), whose range encompasses the Napo centre of endemism, and not the Imeri centre representative, Chestnut-crested Antbird R. cristata, for which species the Caquetá / Japurá River was recently confirmed as a distributional limit (Ribas et al. 2018). Our records of Selenidera toucanets were heard only, and we could not determine if they referred to Golden-collared Toucanet S. reinwardtii or the Imeri endemic Tawny-tufted Toucanet S. nattereri. The picture that emerges is of the area between the Putumayo and Vaupés Rivers being a zone of transition between the Napo and Imeri centres of endemism, with taxa typical of the latter having been found well to the south-west of the centre as traditionally defined, even beyond the geological boundaries of the Guiana Shield (Osmonson et al. 2000). Similar transitional areas have been found, for example, in the Branco / Negro interfluvium in Brazil, where two distinct avifaunas from west of the Negro and east of the Branco meet (Naka et al. 2010). Recent records of Yellow-throated Antwren Myrmotherula ambigua and Rose-breasted Chat Granatellus pelzelni from the Puerto Leguízamo area (D. Calderón-Franco et al. in prep.) further underscore the Guianan / Imeri flavour’ to the avifauna on the Colombian bank of the Putumayo, and hint at the complexity of distributional patterns in the poorly explored Colombian Amazon.

Additional field work on the Colombian side of the Putumayo is certain to provide useful data to further unravel these patterns, and to address distributional questions at a finer scale, including the extent to which the Caquetá River, which runs almost parallel to the Putumayo to the north and is even longer (c.2,800 km, making it the fourth-largest tributary of the Amazon, Goulding et al. 2003), also constitutes a biogeographical barrier. Genetic studies of avian populations either side of the Putumayo would also shed light on the river's role as a barrier, especially given increasing awareness of cryptic diversity in Amazonian birds (Whitney & Cohn-Haft 2013), and of the fine-scale nature of endemism in Amazonia (Fernandes 2013). Recent field work on the Colombian side of the Putumayo has already resulted in one new species for the national list—Cocha Antshrike Thamnophilus praecox (Williams 2016, Janni et al. in prep.)—and more such discoveries surely await. Of the species mentioned above as occurring on the Peruvian side of the Putumayo, Heterocercus aurantiivertex seems especially likely to occur in Colombia as well, as its range is very similar to that of Thamnophilus praecox. One obstacle to field work along the Colombian Putumayo is difficulty of access: the area downstream of Puerto Asís lacks roads and transport is by boat along the main waterways, with Puerto Leguízamo the only town easily accessed by air. From the latter, a weekly boat visits San Antonio del Estrecho on the Peruvian bank, a journey of c.12 hours; El Encanto is about three-quarters of the way downstream and is one of the few settlements where some accommodation can be secured. The small settlement of La Chorrera, c.55 km north-east of our study site, is reached by a weekly flight from Leticia, and could also serve as a base for exploration. In part due to these logistical challenges, the Colombian part of the Putumayo basin is one of the frontiers of Amazonian ornithology, and we strongly encourage its continued exploration.

Acknowledgements

First and foremost, we thank the indigenous communities of El Encanto, San Rafael del Caraparaná and Tercera India for permitting access to their communal lands. Jurgen Beckers drew our attention to the El Encanto area, encouraged us to survey it and provided much-appreciated logistical information from his visit in 2015; his records are archived in eBird. Morton L. Isler kindly examined our sound-recordings of antbirds from El Encanto, provided valuable input on their identification, and improved our understanding of the distribution of several taxa discussed herein. Alexandre Aleixo and Gustavo Bravo provided insights on Thamnophilus aethiops and Percnostola rufifrons, respectively. Diego Calderón-Franco shared some records from a visit to the Puerto Leguízamo area in 2017. AC thanks Leica Sports Optics for the loan of optical equipment.

References:

1.

Álvarez, M., Umaña, A. M., Mejía, G. D., Caijao, J., von Hildebrand, P. & Gast, F. 2003. Aves del Parque Nacional Natural Serranía de Chiribiquete, Amazonia – Provincia de la Guyana, Colombia. Biota Colombiana 4: 49–63. Google Scholar

2.

Alverson, W. S., Vriesendorp, C., del Campo, A., Moskovitz, D. K., Stotz, D. F., García Donayre, M. & Bobor, L. A. (eds.) 2008. Ecuador-Peru: Cuyabeno-Güeppí. Rapid Biological and Social Inventories Rep. 20. Field Museum, Chicago. Google Scholar

3.

Avendaño, J. E., Bohórquez, C. I., Rosselli, L., Arzuza-Buelvas, D., Estela, F. A., Cuervo, A. M., Stiles, F. G. & Renjifo, L. M. 2017. Lista de chequeo de las aves de Colombia: una síntesis del estado de conocimiento desde Hilty & Brown (1986). Orn. Colombiana 16: eA01. Google Scholar

4.

Ayerbe-Quiñones, F. 2018. Guía ilustrada de la avifauna colombiana. Wildlife Conservation Society Colombia, Bogotá. Google Scholar

5.

Bennet-Defler, S. B. 1994. Las aves de la Estación Caparu: una lista preliminar de especies. Trianea Act. Cien. Tech. (INDERENA) 5: 379–400. Google Scholar

6.

Bonilla-Castillo, C., Peña, F. A., Bonilla-Velazquez, C. & Velazquez-Figueroa, I. 2017. La corocora (Eudocimus ruber) en la llanura amazónica entre los ríos Caquetá y Putumayo. Orn. Colombiana 16: eNB01. Google Scholar

7.

Brigham, R. M., Ng, J., Poulin, R. G. & Grindal, S. D. 2011. Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor), v. 2.0. In Rodewald, P. G. (ed.) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.213  Google Scholar

8.

Capparella, A. P., Rosenberg, G. H. & Cardiff, S. W. 1997. A new subspecies of Percnostola rufifrons (Formicariidae) from northeastern Amazonian Peru, with a revision of the rufifrons complex. Pp. 165–170 in Remsen, J. V. (ed.) Studies in Neotropical ornithology honoring Ted Parker. Orn. Monogr. 48. Google Scholar

9.

Cracraft, J. 1985. Historical biogeography and patterns of differentiation within the South American avifauna: areas of endemism. Pp. 49–84 in Buckley, P. A., Morton, E. , Ridgely, R. S. & Buckley, F. G. (eds.) Neotropical ornithology. Orn. Monogr. 36. Google Scholar

10.

Díaz-Alván, J., Socolar, J. B. & ⏢⏢lvarez Alonso, J. 2017. The avifauna of the Río Tigre basin, northern Perú. Orn. Neotrop. 28: 11–21. Google Scholar

11.

Fernandes, A.M. 2013. Fine-scale endemism of Amazonian birds in a threatened landscape. Biodiver. Conserv. 22: 2683–2694. Google Scholar

12.

Fernandes, A. M., Cohn-Haft, M., Hrbek, T & Farias, I. P. 2014. Rivers acting as barriers for bird dispersal in the Amazon. Rev. Bras. Orn. 22: 361–371. Google Scholar

13.

Freeman, B. G. & Montgomery, G. A. 2017. Using song playback experiments to measure species recognition between geographically isolated populations: a comparison with acoustic trait analyses. Auk 134: 857–870. Google Scholar

14.

Freile, J. F., Solano-Ugalde, A., Brinkhuizen, D. M., Greenfield, P. J., Lysinger, M., Nilsson, J., Navarrete, L. & Ridgely, R. S. 2017. Rare birds in Ecuador: third report of the Committee for Ecuadorian Records in Ornithology (CERO). Rev. Ecuatoriana Orn. 1: 8–27. Google Scholar

15.

Gilmore, M. P., Vriesendorp, C., Alverson, W. S., del Campo, A., von May, R., López Wong, C. & Ríos Ochoa, S. (eds.) 2010. Peru: Maijuna. Rapid Biological and Social Inventories Rep. 22. Field Museum, Chicago. Google Scholar

16.

Goulding, M., Barthem, R. & Ferreira, E. J. G. 2003. The Smithsonian atlas of the Amazon. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC. Google Scholar

17.

Haffer, J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165: 131–137. Google Scholar

18.

Hilty, S. L. & Brown, W. L. 1986. A guide to the birds of Colombia. Princeton Univ. Press. Google Scholar

19.

del Hoyo, J. & Collar, N. J. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International illustrated checklist of the birds of the world, vol. 2. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

20.

Isler, M. L., Alonso, J. A., Isler, P. R. & Whitney, B. M. 2001. A new species of Percnostola antbird (Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae) from Amazonian Peru, and an analysis of species limits within Percnostola rufifrons. Wilson Bull. 113: 164–176. Google Scholar

21.

Isler, M. L., Isler, P. R. & Whitney, B. M. 2007. Species limits in antbirds (Thamnophilidae): the Warbling Antbird (Hypocnemis cantator) complex. Auk 124: 11–28. Google Scholar

22.

Janni, O., Beckers, J. & Peña, F. A. in prep. First records of Cocha Antshrike (Thamnophilus praecox) for Colombia. Google Scholar

23.

Lafrancesco, G. M., Mateus, C. L. & Oviedo, G. 1987. Contribuciones al estudio de los passeriformes furnariidos de Colombia, entrega 3, furnariidos del Museo de Ciencas Naturales de la Universidad de La Salle. Bol. Cient. Univ. La Salle 2: 63–144. Google Scholar

24.

McMullan, M. 2018. Field guide to the birds of Colombia. Third edn. Ed. Rey Naranjo, Bogotá. Google Scholar

25.

McMullan, M. & Donegan, T. 2014. Field guide to the birds of Colombia. Second edn. Fundación ProAves, Bogotá. Meyer de Schauensee, R. 1945. Notes on Colombian antbirds, ovenbirds, and woodhewers, with the description of a new form from Peru. Notulae Naturae 153: 1–15. Google Scholar

26.

Meyer de Schauensee, R. 1952. Colombian zoological survey. Part X. A collection of birds from southeastern Nariño, Colombia. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 104: 1–33. Google Scholar

27.

Naka, L. N. 2010. Avian distribution patterns in the Guiana Shield: implications for the delimitation of Amazonian areas of endemism. J. Biogeogr. 38: 681–696. Google Scholar

28.

Naka, L. N., Brechtold, C. L., Henriques, L. M. P. & Brumfield, R. T. 2012. The role of physical barriers in the location of avian suture zones in the Guiana Shield, northern Amazonia. Amer. Natur. 179: 1–19. Google Scholar

29.

Oliveira, U., Vasconcelos, M. F. & Santos, A. J. 2017. Biogeography of Amazon birds: rivers limit species composition, but not areas of endemism. Scientific Rep. 7: 2992. Google Scholar

30.

Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA). 1993. Plan Colombo-Peruano para el desarrollo integral de la cuenca del río Putumayo: diagnóstico regional. Organización de Estados Americanos, Washington DC. Google Scholar

31.

Osmonson, L. M., Persits, F. M., Steinhouer, D. W. & Klett, T. R. 2000. Geologic provinces of the world. US Geological Survey (USGS), Denver, CO. Google Scholar

32.

Pitman, N., Smith, R. C., Vriesendorp, D., Moskovitz, D., Piana, R., Knell, G. & Wachter, T. (eds.) 2004. Peru: Ampiyacu, Apayacu, Yaguas, medio Putumayo. Rapid Biological and Social Inventories Rep. 12. Field Museum, Chicago. Google Scholar

33.

Pitman, N., Vriesendorp, C., Moskovitz, D. K., von May, D., Alvira, D., Wachter, T., Stotz, D. F. & del Campo, A. (eds.) 2011. Peru: Yaguas-Cotuhé. Rapid Biological and Social Inventories Rep. 23. Field Museum, Chicago. Google Scholar

34.

Pitman, N., Ruelas Inzunza, E., Vriesendorp, C., Stotz, D. F., Wachter, T., Alvira, D., Rodríguez Grández, B., Smith, R. C., Sáenz Rodríguez, A. R. & Soria Ruiz, P. (eds.) 2013. Peru: Ere-Campuya-Algodón. Rapid Biological and Social Inventories Rep. 25. Field Museum, Chicago. Google Scholar

35.

Pitman, N., Bravo, A., Claramunt, S., Vriesendorp, C., Alvira Reyes, D., Ravikumar, A., del Campo, A., Stotz, D. F., Wachter, T., Heilpern, S., Rodríguez Grández, B., Sáenz Rodríguez, A. R. & Smith, R. C. (eds.) 2016. Peru: medio Putumayo-Algodón. Rapid Biological and Social Inventories Rep. 28. Field Museum, Chicago. Google Scholar

36.

Remsen, J. V., Areta, J. I., Cadena, C. D., Claramunt, S., Jaramillo, A., Pacheco, J. F., Pérez-Emán, J., Robbins, M. B., Stiles, F. G., Stotz, D. F. & Zimmer, K. J. 2018. A classification of the bird species of South America.  www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm (accessed 18 April 2018). Google Scholar

37.

Ribas, C. C., Aleixo, A., Gubili, C., D'Horta, F. M., Brumfield, R. T. & Cracraft, J. 2018. Biogeography and diversification of Rhegmatorhina (Aves: Thamnophilidae): implications for the evolution of Amazonian landscapes during the Quaternary. J. Biogeogr. 45: 917–928. Google Scholar

38.

Ridgely, R. S. & Greenfield, P. J. 2001. The birds of Ecuador. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar

39.

Robbins, M. B., Capparella, A. P., Ridgely, R. S. & Cardiff, S. W. 1991. Avifauna of the Río Manití and Quebrada Vainilla, Peru. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 143: 145–159. Google Scholar

40.

van Roosmalen, M. G. M., van Roosmalen, T. & Mittermeier, R. A. 2002. A taxonomic review of the titi monkeys, genus Callicebus Thomas, 1903, with the description of two new species, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, from Brazilian Amazonia. Neotrop. Primates 10(Suppl.): 1–52. Google Scholar

41.

Salaman, P. G. W., Donegan, T. M. & Cuervo, A. M. 1999. Ornithological surveys in Serranía de los Churumbelos, southern Colombia. Cotinga 12: 29–39. Google Scholar

42.

Schmitt, F., Sané, R., Thibault, M. & Vásquez, G. 2017. New locality for White-masked Antbird Pithys castaneus and other avian range extensions for dpto. Loreto, Peru. Cotinga 39: 2–11. Google Scholar

43.

Schulenberg, T. S., Stotz, D. F., Lane, D. F., O'Neill, J. P. & Parker, T. A. 2007. Birds of Peru. Princeton Univ. Press. Google Scholar

44.

Silva, J. C., Rylands, A. B. & da Fonseca, G. A. B. 2005. The fate of the Amazonian areas of endemism. Conserv. Biol. 19: 689–694. Google Scholar

45.

Socolar, J. B., Díaz-Alván, J., Saboya del Castillo, P., Pomara, L. Y., O'Shea, B. J., Cubas Poclin, S., Stotz, D. F., Schmitt, F., Graham, D., Barnes, B. H. & Ruelas Inzunza, E. 2018. Noteworthy bird records from northeastern Peru reveal connectivity and isolation in the western Amazonian avifauna. Wilson J. Orn. 130: 94–111. Google Scholar

46.

Stiles, F. G. 2010. La avifauna de la parte media del río Apaporis, departamentos de Vaupés y Amazonas, Colombia. Rev. Acad. Colombiana Cienc. Exactas, Fís. Natur. 34: 381–390. Google Scholar

47.

Stiles, F. G., Telleria, J. L. & Díaz, M. 1995. Observaciones sobre la composicíon, ecología y zoogeografía de la avifauna de la Sierra de Chiribiquete, Caquetá, Colombia. Caldasia 17: 481–500. Google Scholar

48.

Thom, G. & Aleixo, A. 2015. Cryptic speciation in the white-shouldered antshrike (Thamnophilus aethiops –Aves, Thamnophilidae): the tale of a transcontinental radiation across rivers in lowland Amazonia and the northeastern Atlantic Forest. Mol. Phyl. & Evol. 82: 95–110. Google Scholar

49.

Verhelst-Montenegro, J. C. & Salaman, P. 2015. Checklist of the birds of Colombia / Lista de las aves de Colombia, v. 18 May 2015.  https://sites.google.com/site/haariehbamidbar/atlas-of-the-birds-of-colombia (accessed 27 December 2017). Google Scholar

50.

Wallace, A. R. 1852. On the monkeys of the Amazon. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1852: 107–110. Google Scholar

51.

Weir, J. T., Faccio, M. S., Pulido-Santacruz, P., Barrera-Guzmán, A. O. & Aleixo, A. 2015. Hybridization in headwater regions, and the role of rivers as drivers of speciation in Amazonian birds. Evolution 69: 1823–1834. Google Scholar

52.

Whitney, B. M. & Cohn-Haft, M. 2013. Fifteen new species of Amazonian birds. Pp 223–239 in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J. & Christie, D. A. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world , spec. vol. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

53.

Williams, R. 2016. Neotropical notebook. Neotrop. Birding 18: 45–52. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1

e01_244.gif
e02_244.gif
e03_244.gif
e04_244.gif
e05_244.gif
© 2018 The Authors; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Ottavio Janni, Andrea Corso, and Michele Viganò "Range extensions for White-shouldered Antshrike Thamnophilus aethiops, Imeri Warbling Antbird Hypocnemis flavescens and Black-headed Antbird Percnostola rufifrons along the Putumayo River in Colombia, and their biogeographical significance," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 138(3), 244-259, (24 September 2018). https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v138i3.2018.a5
Received: 27 April 2018; Published: 24 September 2018
Back to Top