Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
3 March 2022 Influence of tea-Pleurotus ostreatus intercropping on soil fungal diversity and community structure
Zhanxia Ma, Krizler C. Tanalgo, Qiuli Xu, Weitao Li, Shanshan Wu, Qing Ji, Gengyun Pan, Ruifang Wang
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Understanding the relationship between soil fungal communities and soil function is vital to establish a sustainable and ecologically friendly tea (Camellia sinensis L.) cultivation. However, there is limited research on the response of soil fungal communities to tea-fungus intercropping, particularly how it is related to soil biodiversity and fertility. Here, we assessed and compared the fungal communities using a metabarcoding technique, soil properties in three plantations (1, 2, and 5 yr of tea-Pleurotus intercropping plantations), and a 5 yr chemically fertilized monoculture plantation. We obtained a total of 3493 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) from four tea plantations. Five hundred and ninety-three fungal OTUs are shared by all plantations, and the other 471 fungal OTUs are shared by three plantations. The largest number of OTUs was recorded in 5 yr tea-Pleurotus intercropped plantations (N = 2040), followed by 2 yr (N = 2024) and then 1 yr (N = 1471), while the chemically fertilized plantation recorded 1823 OTUs. Tea-Pleurotus intercropping showed a significant effect on the increased diversity of soil fungal diversity compared with the monoculture tea cultivations. Fungal groups Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and Mortierellomycota were the most abundant taxonomic groups recorded in all soil samples. Principal coordinate analysis revealed that fungal community composition in tea-Pleurotus intercropped plantations and monoculture tea plantations was significantly different. Besides, redundancy analysis revealed that soil nutrients significantly influence soil fungal community composition. Our results demonstrate that tea-Pleurotus intercropping may offer long-term benefits to soil biodiversity and sustainable benefits in the tea plantations.

Introduction

Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) is an important global industry, which is widely grown from the tropical to the subtropical areas of some Asian countries, such as southern China (Kavitha et al. 2016). By 2020, the total land area for tea plantations in China was estimated at around 2.93 million ha, accounting for more than half of the world’s total tea planting area and producing 2.61 million tons of tea (about 45% of the world’s total tea production) in 2018 alone. However, drastic decline in yield, soil degradation, and reduction of beneficial soil bacteria were observed in long-term monoculture tea cultivations, which concerns many soil ecologists and agriculturists (Han et al. 2007; Li et al. 2016; Arafat et al. 2017; Gu et al. 2019). The monoculture mode in tea plantations also poses more environmental concerns toward soil erosions (Zhang et al. 2003).

Plantation intercropping is commonly used in China for multiple crop cultivation because of its positive benefits on reducing the risk of crop failure by improving land-use management (Seran and Brintha 2010; Song et al. 2021). Compared with monoculture plantations, intercropping mode of cultivation can improve soil quality by adding a large amount of topsoil and subsoil organic matter, which bolsters the releasing and recycling of soil nutrients (Zeng 2009; Powlson et al. 2011; Rowe et al. 2016). Intercropping cultivation provides retentive ground cover that promotes soil structure and prevents drastic erosion in monoculture plantations (Zeng 2009; Gebru 2015). Therefore, intercropping is considered a suitable agricultural practice for the long-term maintenance of soil fertility and optimization of this system compared with traditional monoculture cultivation (Gebru 2015; Song et al. 2021). Among intercropping strategies fungus-plant intercropping has been recently practised in different Chinese plantation systems and showed beneficial effects on soil fungal communities and properties (Chen et al. 2012; Song et al. 2021). Song et al. (2021), for example, reported the positive effects of peach-Morchella intercropping in soil properties and fungal communities, whereas pear-Pleurotus intercropping showed increase in soil microbial community, soil fertility, and fruit yield quality (Chen et al. 2012). In tea plantations, tea-Stropharia rugosoannulata intercropping was previously studied and significantly increased soil organic matter content, total and available N content, and reduced soil acidification and soil bulk density, and consequently improved soil structure (Han and Chen 2013). Similarly, intercropping a different fungal species, Oudemansiella radicata, in tea plantations has shown a significant increase in the soil available N, P, and K content and tea polysaccharide content (Jing et al. 2018). Other studies have also found that fungal intercropping in tea plantations enriched the abundance of bacteria and actinomycete in soil compared with monoculture tea plantations (Yang et al. 2017).

Fungi are ubiquitous and vital part of overall soil ecosystems; therefore, improving fungal diversity in soils plays a key role in optimizing critical ecological function including nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and plant primary productivity (Klaubauf et al. 2010; Tedersoo et al. 2014; Cobb et al. 2016; Saha et al. 2019). Previous studies showed that the composition and diversity of soil fungal communities are influenced by various factors such as plant species composition, soil types, and agricultural management (Guo et al. 2016; Trivedi et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2016; Carson et al. 2019). By understanding the role of soil fungal communities in soil ecosystems especially in agroecosystems, it is critical to highlight their ecosystem services and benefits (Delgado-Baquerizo et al. 2016). Previous studies on this system mainly focused on the effects of intercropping edible fungus on soil properties soil and tea yield. Yet, there is a relative lack of studies on the composition and diversity of the soil fungal community in the tea-fungal intercropping plantations, which warrants in-depth studies and investigations. Second to Agaricus bisporus, the edible mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. Fr.) Kummer is a widely grown fungal taxa mainly for food and other industrial use making it an ideal fungal intercrop in tea plantations (Sánchez 2010). Pleurotus ostreatus persists in a wide range of environments because of its low environmental requirements enabling its easy colonization of wide suite of lignocellulosic substrates and other waste products, especially from agroecosystems. Additionally, P. ostreatus has a shorter growth period and simple sterilization (Das and Mukherjee 2007) making it inexpensive and viable fungal intercrops in tea cultivations.

Precise assessment of fungal communities in soil ecosystems is important to fully understand impacts of different systems, yet this is time consuming and challenging (Begerow et al. 2010). High-throughput metabarcoding techniques have been recognized as a powerful tool to study fungal communities in ecosystems due to their high resolution and efficiency in detection (Li et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2019; Joos et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2021). In this study, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to assess the composition and diversity of soil fungal communities in tea-Pleurotus ostreatus (hereinafter tea-Pleurotus) intercropping with 1, 2, and 5 yr cultivation time versus monoculture tea plantations with 5 yr chemical fertilizer treatment in the hilly region of southwest Yunnan, China. The study further aimed to explore the relationship between changes in fungal communities and soil parameters to explore the potential environmental factors that influence the variation in diversity. Consequently, we hope that our findings will provide a basis for the establishment of organic and ecologically friendly tea cultivation using tea-Pleurotus intercropping in southwest China.

Materials and Methods

Tea-Pleurotus intercropping

We sampled soils from tea plantations of Pu’er City in the province of Yunnan, southwest China. The location lies in the low-latitude plateau of the southern subtropical monsoon climate zone, with an altitude of about 1302 m a.s.l. The annual average temperature ranges from 15 °C to 20 °C and the annual precipitation ranges from 1200 to 2700 mm. The cultivated tea variety in Pu’er is the big leaf tea, which was planted in 2004. The edible fungus used for intercropping is P. ostreatus (cultivar PG981; each bag has 500 g of fungus inoculant).

We collected soil samples for the experiment from four treatment plot areas of the plantations, namely: the 1 yr intercropping plantation (I1), the 2 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantation (I2), and the 5 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantation (I3). Monoculture plantation with chemical compound fertilizer applied for 5 yr (M1) with CK. The management measures and the environmental condition of all the plantations sampled are consistent and similar throughout the experiment. Edible fungi were inoculated in the tea cultivations. First, the surface of tea rows was cleared from weeds before P. ostreatus was inoculated in the soil. The fungi were intercropped in the wider side of the tea row, by digging a trench with a width of about 20 cm and depth of about 18 cm at a distance of 10–15 cm from the stem of the tea plant to avoid damaging the main root system of the plant. The bag of P. ostreatus inoculant was stripped and positioned horizontally in the trench to allow the fungus bag and the soil rhizosphere tightly placed on the side of the tea row. Fungal bags are connected from end to end of a row and then covered with 2–3 cm soil. The setup was consistently irrigated to ensure that the fungal bags is moisturized at about 60%. Under suitable conditions, the edible fungus can generally be harvested for three to five cropping seasons. Edible fungi are typically planted from August to October every year.

Soil sampling and collection

Each soil sample was represented by four samples collected around each sampling point. We collected two contiguous soil samples (i.e., each for soil fungal community analysis and soil chemical analysis) using steel cores of 5 cm diameter and 9–10 cm depth for fungal diversity and soil nutrient analysis. The sampling depth of the cores was in the deeper 10–30 cm layer to maximize the detection of fungal communities (e.g., Zhang et al. 2020). Soils for microbial samples were thoroughly sieved using a 2 mm mesh, homogenized, and then divided into two subsamples: a 5 g of homogenized soil was used for molecular analysis to evaluate the soil microbial community. Fifty grams of air-dried soil from the same samples was used for soil physicochemical analysis that includes total carbon (TC), total N (TN), total P (TP), total K (TK), hydrolyzed N (HyN), available P (AP), available K (AK), and organic matter (OM). These soil composition parameters were measured using the standard analysis procedure at the central laboratory of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (XTBG-CAS), Menglun, P.R. China.

Microbial diversity analysis

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

We used the Biofast Soil Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TIANamp Soil DNA Kit, Germany) to extract three genomic DNA from 5 g subsamples according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To minimize DNA extraction bias, three DNA extractions from each sample were combined prior to PCR. The combined DNA was purified using DNA Purification Kit (TIANgel Purification Kit, Germany) and then stored at –20 °C. Fungal DNA was initially amplified with the primers: ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS2 (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′) for library preparation. The PCR reactions were repeated three times to minimize PCR bias (e.g., in Liu et al. 2013; Yu et al. 2012) in a 20 μL mixture containing 4 μL 5 × FastPfu Buffer, 2 μL 2.5 mmol·L−1 dNTPs, 0.5 μL each primer (5 μmol·L−1), 0.4 μL FastPfu Polymerase, and 10 ng template DNA, and makeup 20 μL with purified water. PCR reaction conditions are 95 °C pre-denaturation for 4 min; 94 °C denaturation for 30 s, 45 °C annealing for 20 s, 65 °C extension for 30 s, 5 cycles; denaturation at 94 °C for 20 s, annealing at 55 °C for 20 s, extension at 72 °C, 30 s, 20 cycles; extension at 72 °C for 4 min; storage at 10 °C.

Library establishment and Illumina Miseq sequencing

After quantitative mixing of PCR products, we utilized the library building kit provided by Illumina (Illumina Inc., California, United States) to build the reference library according to the building instructions and performed absolute quantification of the library using the 2 × SYBR provided by Beijing Soleibao Technology Co., Ltd. After mixing the purified library in approximately equimolar concentrations, we used MiSeq ReagentKit v2.5 (Illumina Inc. 2015) for paired-end sequencing (2 × 250).

Illumina data analysis

The quality of the sequences was first detected with FastQC software, and quality score is greater than 20, then used the default pipeline in QIIME to control the quality through the following Caporaso et al. (2010): (i) the reads were truncated in two ends to achieve average quality value less than 20 bp and discard the trimmed sequence that was less than 50 bp; (ii) the reads with two nucleotide mismatches in the primer sequence and ambiguous bases were removed; (iii) when the sequence is assembled, only sequences with an overlap of more than 10 bp are assembled according to the overlapping sequence, and the reads that cannot be assembled with less than 10 bp were discarded; (iv) sequences shorter than 300 bp after assembly were eliminated. Fungal sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 97% identity threshold, and the UPARSE pipeline was used to select OTUs (Edgar 2013). Using UCHIME, chimeric sequences were identified and removed. Rarefaction curves, the abundance-based coverage estimators (ACE), Chao1, Shannon–Wiener index, and Simpson’s index were calculated and built based on OTUs. Chao1 and ACE were calculated to estimate the abundance of fungal communities based on sequence differences. Shannon–Wiener index and Simpson index were used to estimate the diversity within each sample (Lim et al. 2010).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses and visualization were performed in R environment (version 4.02). To evaluate differences in fungal diversity and soil characteristics at different tea cultivation, we used multiple comparisons of Tukey’s HSD in the “vegan” package. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis similarity distance was applied to compare fungal community similarities at different tea plantations. In addition, the similarities and differences among the communities were visualized using the number of shared and unique OTUs in the four different plantations using the Venn diagram. We compared the top 10 classified phyla and 30 classified genera using heat map analysis in the “pheatmap” package. Lastly, the soil fungal composition and properties were categorized by redundancy analysis (RDA) and using the Monte Carlo permutation test to determine the significance of the RDA axis using the “ade4” package.

Results

Soil fungal community and diversity

The sequencing coverage of soil samples in the four plots reaches from 99.75% up to 99.83% as the depth of sequencing increases, which sufficiently covers the measurable sequences in the samples (Fig. 1). A total of 3493 OTUs were identified from all tea plantations sampled. There were 1471, 2024, 2040, and 1823 OTUs in the soil samples from treatments I1, I2, I3, and M1(CK), respectively. There were 593 fungal OTUs shared by all plantations and 471 fungal OTUs shared by three plantations (Fig. 2). The 5 yr tea-fungal intercropping plantation showed the highest abundance (ACE and Chao1), while soils from the 2 yr tea-Pleurotus intercropping plantations had the highest richness (Shannon and Simpson index). Yet, the values of the Simpson index were not significantly (P > 0.05) differ across the four plantations (Fig. 3), whereas abundance-based indices, Chao1 and ACE, showed a significant positive trend with tea-Pleurotus intercropping years (P < 0.05), but the values of diversity index Shannon and Simpson within tea-Pleurotus intercropping years showed inconsistent patterns (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1.

Rarefaction curve for the total fungal community at different plantation types: 1 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I1), 2 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I2), 5 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I3), and 5 yr chemically fertilized monoculture plantations (M1). [Colour online.]

cjss-2021-0123f1.tif

Fig. 2.

A Venn diagram showing the number of shared operational taxonomic units across different soil samples from tea-Pleurotus intercropping: 1 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I1), 2 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I2), 5 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I3), and 5 yr chemically fertilized monoculture plantations (M1). [Colour online.]

cjss-2021-0123f2.tif

Fig. 3.

Comparison of indices of richness and diversity of fungal taxa in different tea plantations: 1 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I1), 2 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I2), 5 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I3), and 5 yr chemically fertilized monoculture plantations (M1). According to the Tukey’s HSD test, values with different lowercase letters in the column (mean ± SD, n = 4) are significantly different at P < 0.05.

cjss-2021-0123f3.tif

Composition of soil fungal communities

The taxonomic sequences from the soils of tea plantations predominantly consist of Ascomycota (44.7%), Mortierellomycota (17.7%), and Basidiomycota (11.4%), which accounts for 73.8% of the total composition of fungal communities, while the remaining sequences either belong to smaller fungal phyla or unclassified taxa (Fig. 4A). The most representative genus Saitozyma was the most dominant taxa among tea plantation sites, and particularly higher in the 5 yr chemically fertilized plantations. In addition, we also identified the genera Archaeorhizomyces, Mortierella, and Fusarium dominating the tea four plantations (Table 1, Fig. 4B). Among the identified taxa at the genus level, Saitozyma, Archaeorhizomyces, Mortierella, Fusarium, and Cladophialophora showed significant differences across tea cultivation treatments. Principal coordinate analysis was employed to determine differences in the fungal community in the soil sampled from four tea cultivation treatments (Fig. 5). The first two principal coordinates represented 22.74% (PCo1) and 12.77% (PCo2) of the total variation in the fungal community in a single soil sample (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.569, P = 0.001). The samples in the tea-Pleurotus cluster showed high differences in community structure, while the PCo2 showed that the fungal communities in the intercropping tea plantations were separated with the chemically fertilized tea cultivations (Fig. 6).

Fig. 4.

The relative abundances of fungal phyla (left) and genera (right) in four tea plantations: 1 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I1), 2 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I2), 5 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I3), and 5 yr chemically fertilized monoculture plantations (M1). [Colour online.]

cjss-2021-0123f4.tif

Table 1.

Relative abundance (%) of soil fungal taxa (at genus level) from different tea plantations.

cjss-2021-0123tab1.gif

Fig. 5.

Principal coordinate analysis plot showing the variation across all plantations: 1 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I1), 2 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I2), 5 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I3), and 5 yr chemically fertilized monoculture plantations (M1). The first two axes are shown as the percentage of the total variance. [Colour online.]

cjss-2021-0123f5.tif

Fig. 6.

The redundancy analysis plot of soil fungal community composition and soil physicochemical properties: 1 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I1), 2 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I2), 5 yr tea-fungus intercropping plantations (I3), and 5 yr chemically fertilized monoculture plantations (M1). [Colour online.]

cjss-2021-0123f6.tif

Effects of soil properties on soil fungal communities

The total C, N, P, K, hydrolyzed N, available K, and organic matter content of soil showed a positive trend with the increase of the intercropping cultivation years, but the available P content showed inconsistent trend across years of intercropping period (Table 2). Among all tea-Pleurotus cultivation treatments, the 5 yr intercropping showed significantly higher values for the total C, N, P, hydrolyzed N, available K, and organic matter content of the soil compared with the other three plantations (Table 2). The RDA results showed that total C, N, P, K, hydrolyzed N, available K, and organic matter have a significant influence on the soil fungal communities, while the effects of available P are slightly relative (Table 3). We found a positive correlation between the diversity of Aphelidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, Entomophthoromycota, and Zoopagomycota with the total C, N, P, hydrolyzed N, available K, and organic matter content (Table 3, Fig. 6), whereas Mucoromycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Rozellomycota, and Blastocladiomycota were positively correlated with both total and effective K content. Calcarisporiellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Ascomycota, and Glomeromycota were positively correlated with available P content and negatively correlated with the total K content. Overall, the highest correlation between soil fungal composition and soil properties was observed in the 5 yr tea-Pleurotus intercropping plantation (Table 3, Fig. 6).

Table 2.

Mean values of physicochemical properties of soil under different tea plantations.

cjss-2021-0123tab2.gif

Table 3.

Significance of fungi community in relation with the physicochemical properties of soil from different tea plantations.

cjss-2021-0123tab3.gif

Discussion

Effect of tea-fungus intercropping on fungal diversity

Our present study demonstrated the effects of tea-Pleurotus intercropping to soil fungal communities and properties. Here, we demonstrate an apparent difference in fungal community response based on intercropping period and practices, for example, it is evident that fungal richness in the 5 yr intercropping cultivations was significantly higher than the other three tea plantation cultivations (Fig. 2). However, fungal diversity is relatively higher in the 2 yr intercropping compared with other plantation intercropping treatments. Unsurprisingly, the 1 yr intercropping had the lowest number of OTUs and overall diversity indices. Our results indicate that the effects of the longer or continuous period of intercropping may have positive effects on fungal richness, while shorter intercropping may support the peak soil fungal diversity in tea plantations. This indicates that changes in fungal community structure in Tea-Pleurotus cultivation may vary over time and depend on the mode of intercropping. This further suggests the effects of intercropping are beneficial in long-term tea cultivation when fungal richness is taken into consideration. Our findings are similar to patterns observed by Song et al. (2021) demonstrating that continuous peach-Morchella intercropping improved soil structure while fungal diversity decreased. In the same study, the observed plant growth in intercropped treatments was enhanced by the improved soil fertility and physicochemical properties. Generally, in our study, we found fungal community significantly improved in fungal-intercropped tea plantations compared with those without intercropping. This result may be explained by the increased content of hydrolyzed N and available K in long-term intercropping, which is favorable in stimulating fungal growth in soils, which then contributes to overall soil processes (Vosnjak et al. 2021). Furthermore, previous findings from both experimental (Vosnjak et al. 2021) and natural grassland ecosystems (Li et al. 2019) reported similar patterns of results, showing that changes increase in N and P soil showed a positive relationship to the diversity of fungal communities in soil ecosystems.

Effect of tea-fungus intercropping on fungal community composition

A total of 3493 OTUs were obtained from four tea plantations represented by Ascomycota (44.7%), followed by Basidiomycota (17.7%) and Mortierellomycota (11.4%), while the other remaining phyla accounted for a much smaller proportion of other groups (Fig. 3A). Our findings conform with previous global soil sampling study, showing that the most abundant fungal phyla based on OTUs detection are represented by Ascomycota (48.7%) and Basidiomycota (41.8%), indicating that they are naturally abundant in most soil ecosystems (Tedersoo et al. 2014). In addition, studies on various ages and modes of tea cultivation showed that the most dominant groups are mainly Ascomycota (60%) and Basidiomycota (34%) (Wang et al., 2017). The dominant presence of Ascomycetes has beneficial roles in these systems as they contribute to increased degradation of decayed organic matter and degrade cellulose (Lim et al. 2010). The dominant phylum Basidiomycota in our samples may be an important factor to plant growth as it colonizes plant roots and aids plants the plants obtain nutrients, such as P from the soil (Lim et al. 2010). The other dominant is phylum Mortierellomycota and was highest in the 5 yr tea-Pleurotus intercropped tea plantation compared with the chemically fertilized plantation. This phylum is a common beneficial fungus to other soil microorganisms, not only promoting plant growth but also increasing the resistance level of plants (Ozimek and Hanaka 2021) and controlling root rot disease in plants (Whipps 2004).

The tea-Pleurotus intercropping in our study showed to support the relative abundance of the most important soil fungal phyla Mortierellomycota and Ascomycota, but not Basidiomycota. In addition, compared with the monoculture cropping tea plantations, the relative abundance of Ascomycota differed among three intercropping plantations and the relative abundance was the highest in the 2 yr intercropping, followed by the 1 yr intercropping, and the lowest in the 5 yr intercropping (Fig. 3A). Conversely, the trend in the abundance of Mortierella decreased with the decrease in intercropping years, and Mortierellomycota had a significant positive correlation with soil properties except for TK and AP in the 5 yr cropping. Likewise, Mortierella and Fusarium were the most dominant taxa in 5 yr cropping soils (Fig. 3A). Our results indicate that the dominance of Fusarium in subtropical tea plantations is consistent with the findings of Shen et al. (2015) and Wang et al. (2017), and they reported that Fusarium was the dominant group in the rhizosphere of banana and tea plantations. This may be explained by the increase in soil nutrients by intercropping that promotes optimal growth of Fusarium. In addition, Archaeorhizomyces is the second most dominant fungal group after intercropping cultivations. This taxon is chiefly found in the rhizosphere of plants, closely related to plant growth. All in all, our findings generally suggest that the intercropping of P. ostreatus if harnessed effectively can potentially improve the soil biota in tea plantations and may have important implications on plant growth, disease, and stress resistance of cultivated tea plants.

Diversity analysis using PCOA revealed that the fungal community composition of 1 yr intercropping and 2 yr intercropping had a slight difference in fungal community composition, compared with 5 yr intercropping and chemically fertilized plantation (Fig. 4). For example, the number of unique OTUs is highest in 5 yr intercropping compared with other intercropping years (Fig. 3). Therefore, the intercropping of P. ostreatus in tea cultivation practices offers long-term benefit to the soil ecosystems by increasing soil fertility but reducing the negative effects of monoculture plantation such as the reduction of soil biodiversity that comes with the increase of plantation age (Alekseeva et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2016; Hacisalihoglu et al. 2018).

Edaphic factors influencing fungal community structure

Soil chemical properties and fungal communities are closely related to each other. Soil fertilization is an important soil management method that improves plant growth and has significant effects on the structure of soil microbial communities (Treseder 2008; Zhang et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2016). Growing edible fungi in the tea plantation require a large number of cultivation materials but offer a significant benefits in optimizing in tea plantations significantly increased the content of soil total N, available N and K (Han and Chen 2013) while another fungal taxon, O. radicata also significantly increased the content of available N, P, and K in tea plantations (Jing et al. 2018). In our current study, tea-Pleurotus intercropping increased soil organic matter, total and available N, which compensates for the high N requirements in tea plantations (Zhang et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020). The amount of soil total C, N, P and K, hydrolyzed N, available K, and organic matter showed an upward trend with the increase of tea-Pleurotus intercropping cultivation years, for example, soil properties of the soil in 5 yr intercropping were generally higher compared with other plantation (Table 3). Hence, continuous or longer tea-Pleurotus intercropping positively affects the quality of the soil compared with monoculture tea cultivations that reduce soil nutrition and fertility in the long-term planting cultivations (Arafat et al. 2017; Gu et al. 2019; Han et al. 2007; Li et al. 2016).

The results of the relationship between environmental factors show that C, N, P and K, hydrolyzed N, available K, and organic matter promote soil fungal community composition overall. Furthermore, soil fungal composition is promoted in the 5 yr tea-Pleurotus intercropping and may essentially influenced by total C, N, P, K, hydrolyzed N, available K, and organic matter. This trend between soil fungal taxa and properties sheds light on the increased presence of beneficial fungal taxa that may influence soil fertility and plant growth. For example, Mortierella is relatively abundant in the 5 yr intercropping plantation. This fungal taxa can transform and utilize nutrients and other organic matter in soil and promote soil fertility in agricultural landscapes (Tamayo-Vélez and Osorio 2018; Ozimek and Hanaka 2021). Nonetheless, the cultivation mode of tea-Pleurotus fungus intercropping may not entirely influence the overall observed relationship, other factors should be considered, which we did not explore in the current work, such as the water content of the fungal inoculants, soil texture, and pH value that may influence the physical and chemical properties of the soil and fungal communities (Song et al. 2021). These caveats in the present work warrant further investigation in the future.

Conclusions

Our findings in this present work provided baseline information on the potential of tea-Pleurotus intercropping to improve fungal communities and soil chemical properties in tea plantations. Tea is one of the most important global economic crop products, yet monoculture practices in this system pose environmental concerns in the long term, and alternative strategies to circumvent this is an important step-forward for sustainability in this agricultural system. Our findings in the present study revealed the effects of tea-Pleurotus intercropping on soil fungal communities in traditional Chinese tea plantations. Five years tea-Pleurotus intercropping significantly promoted the diversity of soil fungal community, while the 2 yr tea-Pleurotus intercropping is crucial for soil fungal community structure. The variation in soil fungal community is influenced by combined changes in soil properties and mode of tea-Pleurotus intercropping. Although the application of chemical compound fertilizer can still support soil fungal communities, the benefits to maintain soil natural biota are incomparable to tea-Pleurotus intercropping. In addition, long-term application or excessive application of chemical compound fertilizers has both positive by increasing microbial biomass (Geisseler and Scow 2014) and negative effects such as changes in the physical and chemical properties of the soil, such as soil acidification, and soil compaction, which enormously impacts soil microbial communities and its total environment (Beiying et al. 2010). Fungal intercropping and the conventional fertilizer application, if properly strategized, can potentially work in synergy to optimize tea cultivations. Our findings offer important baseline evidence in establishing more ecologically friendly tea cultivation in terms of effective soil conservation and management through tea-Pleurotus intercropping practices. Furthermore, P. ostreatus is a widely cultivated fungal taxa that are easy to grow in a wide suite of environmental conditions making its application cost-effective and highly available to many agroecosystems (Das and Mukherjee 2007).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the High-Level Talent Introduction Project (K2015034) and the Outstanding Young Teacher Program of Pu’er University (2020GGJS006).

References

1.

Alekseeva, T., Alekseev, A., Xu, R.K., Zhao, A.Z., and Kalinin, P. 2011. Effect of soil acidification induced by a tea plantation on chemical and mineralogical properties of Alfisols in eastern China. Environ. Geochem. Health 33(2): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-010-9327-5. PMID: 20563880. Google Scholar

2.

Arafat, Y., Wei, X., Jiang, Y., Chen, T., Saqib, H.S.A., Lin, S., and Lin, W. 2017. Spatial distribution patterns of root-associated bacterial communities mediated by root exudates in different aged ratooning tea monoculture systems. Int J Mol Sci 18(8): 1727. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081727Google Scholar

3.

Begerow, D., Nilsson, H., Unterseher, M., and Maier, W. 2010. Current state and perspectives of fungal DNA barcoding and rapid identification procedures. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87(1): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2585-4. PMID: 20405123. Google Scholar

4.

Beiying, Z., Tianlin, C., and Bing, W. 2010. Effects of longterm uses of chemical fertilizers on soil quality. Chinese Agric. Sci. Bull. 26(11): 182–187. Google Scholar

5.

Caporaso, J.G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F.D., Costello, E.K., and Knight, R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods, 7(5): 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303. PMID: 20383131. Google Scholar

6.

Carson, C.M., Jumpponen, A., Blair, J.M., and Zeglin, L.H. 2019. Soil fungal community changes in response to long-term fire cessation and N fertilization in tallgrass prairie. Fungal Ecol., 41, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2019.03.002Google Scholar

7.

Chen, S., Hou, D., Wu, W., Sun, W., and Qiu, L. 2012. Influence of interplanting Pleurotus ostreatus on soil biological activity and fruit quality in pear orchard. J. Fruit Sci. 29(4): 583–588. Google Scholar

8.

Cobb, A.B., Wilson, G.W., Goad, C.L., Bean, S.R., Kaufman, R.C., Herald, T.J., and Wilson, J.D. 2016. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in grain production and nutrition of sorghum genotypes: enhancing sustainability through plant-microbial partnership. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 233: 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.024Google Scholar

9.

Das, N., and Mukherjee, M. 2007. Cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus on weed plants. Bioresour. Technol. 98(14): 2723–2726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.061. PMID: 17161599. Google Scholar

10.

Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F.T., Reich, P.B., Jeffries, T.C., Gaitan, J.J., Encinar, D., and Singh, B.K. 2016. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Commun 7(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10541Google Scholar

11.

Edgar, R.C. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10(10): 996–998. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604. PMID: 23955772. Google Scholar

12.

Gebru, H. 2015. A review on the comparative advantage of intercropping systems. J. Biol. Agric. Healthcare, 5(9): 28–38. Google Scholar

13.

Geisseler, D., and Scow, K.M. 2014. Long-term effects of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms–A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 75: 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.023Google Scholar

14.

Gu, S., Hu, Q., Cheng, Y., Bai, L., Liu, Z., Xiao, W., et al. 2019. Application of organic fertilizer improves microbial community diversity and alters microbial network structure in tea (Camellia sinensis) plantation soils. Soil Tillage Res. 195: 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104356Google Scholar

15.

Guo, X., Chen, H.Y., Meng, M., Biswas, S.R., Ye, L., and Zhang, J. 2016. Effects of land use change on the composition of soil microbial communities in a managed subtropical forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 373: 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.048Google Scholar

16.

Hacisalihoglu, S., Gumus, S., and Kezik, U. 2018. Land use conversion effects triggered by tea plantation on landslide occurrence and soil loss in northeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Feb-Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2933. Google Scholar

17.

Han, H., and Chen, M. 2013. Effects of intercropping Stropharia rugoso-annulata on tea garden soil and tea growth. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 28(11): 1088–1092. Google Scholar

18.

Han, W., Kemmitt, S.J., and Brookes, P.C. 2007. Soil microbial biomass and activity in Chinese tea gardens of varying stand age and productivity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39(7): 1468–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.12.029Google Scholar

19.

Jing, Y.L., Zhang, H.H., Pan, J.X., Yang-Jun, L.V., Liu, J., Zhu, Y.J., et al. 2018. Experiment study on intercropping of tea trees and Oudemansiella radicata. Edible Fungi China, 37(6):32–35. Google Scholar

20.

Joos, L., Beirinckx, S., Haegeman, A., Debode, J., Vandecasteele, B., Baeyen, S., et al. 2020. Daring to be differential: metabarcoding analysis of soil and plant-related microbial communities using amplicon sequence variants and operational taxonomical units. BMC Genomics, 21(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07126-4Google Scholar

21.

Kavitha, S., Prapagar, K., and Gunarathne, G.P. 2016. Nutrient Availability of Tea Growing Soil Influenced by Different Rates of Dolomite. J. Tea Sci. Res. 5(6): 1–13. Google Scholar

22.

Klaubauf, S., Inselsbacher, E., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., Wanek, W., Gottsberger, R., Strauss, J., and Gorfer, M. 2010. Molecular diversity of fungal communities in agricultural soils from Lower Austria. Fungal Divers. 44(1): 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0053-1. PMID: 23794962. Google Scholar

23.

Li, Y.C., Li, Z., Li, Z.W., Jiang, Y.H., Weng, B.Q., and Lin, W.X. 2016. Variations of rhizosphere bacterial communities in tea (Camellia sinensis L.) continuous cropping soil by high-throughput pyrosequencing approach. J. Appl. Microbiol. 121(3): 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13225. PMID: 27377624. Google Scholar

24.

Li, Y., Bezemer, T.M., Yang, J., Lü, X., Li, X., Liang, W., et al. 2019. Changes in litter quality induced by N deposition alter soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 130: 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.11.025Google Scholar

25.

Lim, Y.W., Kim, B.K., Kim, C., Jung, H.S., Kim, B.S., Lee, J.H., and Chun, J. 2010. Assessment of soil fungal communities using pyrosequencing. J. Microbiol. 48(3): 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-010-9369-5. PMID: 20571944. Google Scholar

26.

Liu, S., Li, Y., Lu, J., Su, X., Tang, M., Zhang, R., and Zhou, X. 2013. SOAPBarcode: revealing arthropod biodiversity through assembly of Illumina shotgun sequences of PCR amplicons. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4(12): 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12120Google Scholar

27.

Ozimek, E., and Hanaka, A. 2021. Mortierella species as the plant growth-promoting fungi present in the agricultural soils. Agriculture, 11(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11010007Google Scholar

28.

Powlson, D.S., Gregory, P.J., Whalley, W.R., Quinton, J.N., Hopkins, D.W., Whitmore, A.P., et al. 2011. Soil management in relation to sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services. Food Policy, 36: S72–S87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.025Google Scholar

29.

Rowe, H., Withers, P.J., Baas, P., Chan, N.I., Doody, D., Holiman, J., et al. 2016. Integrating legacy soil phosphorus into sustainable nutrient management strategies for future food, bioenergy and water security. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 104(3): 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9726-1Google Scholar

30.

Saha, A., Basak, B.B., Gajbhiye, N.A., Kalariya, K.A., and Manivel, P. 2019. Sustainable fertilization through co-application of biochar and chemical fertilizers improves yield, quality of Andrographis paniculata and soil health. Ind. Crops Prod. 140: 111607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111607Google Scholar

31.

Sánchez, C. 2010. Cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus and other edible mushrooms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 85(5): 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2343-7. PMID: 19956947. Google Scholar

32.

Seran, T.H., and Brintha, I., 2010. Review on Maize Based Intercropping. J. Agron. 9: 135–145. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2010.135.145Google Scholar

33.

Shen, Z., Ruan, Y., Chao, X., Zhang, J., Li, R., and Shen, Q. 2015. Rhizosphere microbial community manipulated by 2 years of consecutive biofertilizer application associated with banana Fusarium wilt disease suppression. Biol. Fertil. Soils 51(5): 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1002-7Google Scholar

34.

Song, H., Chen, D., Sun, S., Li, J., Tu, M., Xu, Z., et al. 2021. Peach-Morchella intercropping mode affects soil properties and fungal composition. PeerJ, 9: e11705. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11705. PMID: 34306827. Google Scholar

35.

Tamayo-Vélez, Á., and Osorio, N.W. 2018. Soil fertility improvement by litter decomposition and inoculation with the fungus Mortierella sp. in avocado plantations of Colombia. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 49(2): 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2017.1417420Google Scholar

36.

Tedersoo, L., Bahram, M., Põlme, S., Kõljalg, U., Yorou, N.S., Wijesundera, R., et al. 2014. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science, 346: 6213. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256688Google Scholar

37.

Treseder, K.K. 2008. Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: A meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecol. Lett. 11(10): 1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x. PMID: 18673384. Google Scholar

38.

Trivedi, P., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Anderson, I.C., and Singh, B.K. 2016. Response of soil properties and microbial communities to agriculture: implications for primary productivity and soil health indicators. Front Plant Sci 7: 990. PMID: 27462326. Google Scholar

39.

Vosnjak, M., Likar, M., and Osterc, G. 2021. The Effect of Mycorrhizal Inoculum and Phosphorus Treatment on Growth and Flowering of Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) Plant. Horticulturae, 7(7): 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070178Google Scholar

40.

Wang, L.M., Huang, D.F., Fang, Y., Wang, F., Li, F.L., and Liao, M. 2017. Soil fungal communities in tea plantation after 10 years of chemical vs. integrated fertilization. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 77(4): 355–364. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-58392017000400355Google Scholar

41.

Wang, S., Li, T., and Zheng, Z. 2016. Effect of tea plantation age on the distribution of soil organic carbon and nutrient within micro-aggregates in the hilly region of western Sichuan, China. Ecol. Eng. 90: 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.046Google Scholar

42.

Whipps, J.M. 2004. Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens. Can. J. Bot. 82(8): 1198–1227. https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-082Google Scholar

43.

Yang, W., Li, C., Wang, S., Zhou, B., Mao, Y., Rensing, C., and Xing, S. 2021. Influence of biochar and biochar-based fertilizer on yield, quality of tea and microbial community in an acid tea orchard soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 166, 104005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104005Google Scholar

44.

Yang, X., Ma, L., Ji, L., Shi, Y., Yi, X., Yang, Q., et al. 2019. Long-term nitrogen fertilization indirectly affects soil fungi community structure by changing soil and pruned litter in a subtropical tea (Camellia sinensis L.) plantation in China. Plant Soil, 444(1): 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04291-8Google Scholar

45.

Yang, Y.L., Ma, J., and Wang, R.F. 2017. Effects of tea-edible fungi intercropping on soil microbial groups of large leaf tea. South China Agric. 11 (2):13–16. Google Scholar

46.

Yu, D.W., Ji, Y., Emerson, B.C., Wang, X., Ye, C., Yang, C., and Ding, Z. 2012. Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3(4): 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00198.xGoogle Scholar

47.

Zeng, WB. 2009. Study on landscape Pattern of agroforestry ecosystem in the region of Changzhutan. Master's dissertation, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China. Google Scholar

48.

Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Sun, L., Qiu, C., Ding, Y., Gu, H., and Ding, Z. 2020. Organic mulching positively regulates the soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions in tea plantation. BMC Microbiol 20(1): 1–13. Google Scholar

49.

Zhang, T., Wang, N.F., Liu, H.Y., Zhang, Y.Q., and Yu, L.Y. 2016. Soil pH is a key determinant of soil fungal community composition in the Ny-Ålesund Region, Svalbard (High Arctic). Front Microbiol 7: 227. PMID: 26955371. Google Scholar

50.

Zhang, Y.H., Hang, H., Peng, B.Z., and Yang, H. 2003. Soil erosion and its impacts on environment in Yixing tea plantation of Jiangsu Province. Chinese Geograph. Sci. 13(2): 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-003-0008-5Google Scholar

51.

Zhou, J., Jiang, X., Zhou, B., Zhao, B., Ma, M., Guan, D., and Qin, J. 2016. Thirty four years of nitrogen fertilization decreases fungal diversity and alters fungal community composition in black soil in northeast China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 95: 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.012Google Scholar
© 2022 The Author(s).
Zhanxia Ma, Krizler C. Tanalgo, Qiuli Xu, Weitao Li, Shanshan Wu, Qing Ji, Gengyun Pan, and Ruifang Wang "Influence of tea-Pleurotus ostreatus intercropping on soil fungal diversity and community structure," Canadian Journal of Soil Science 102(2), 359-369, (3 March 2022). https://doi.org/10.1139/CJSS-2021-0123
Received: 31 August 2021; Accepted: 28 October 2021; Published: 3 March 2022
KEYWORDS
co-friendly plantations
culture intercalaire de thé et de champignons
fungal communities
méta code à barres
metabarcoding
plantations écologiques
populations fongiques
Back to Top