Will genetically engineered crop production affect soil carbon?

Xiying Hao; Srimathie P. Indraratne; Robert E. Blackshaw

doi:10.1139/CJSS2011-072

We can help you reset your password using the email address linked to your BioOne Complete account.

Registered users receive a variety of benefits including the ability to customize email alerts, create favorite journals list, and save searches. Please note that a BioOne web account does not automatically grant access to full-text content. An institutional or society member subscription is required to view non-Open Access content. Contact helpdesk@bioone.org with any questions.

All Fields are Required

First Name

Last/Family Name

Password

Password Requirements: Minimum 8 characters, must include as least one uppercase, one lowercase letter, and one number or permitted symbol Valid Symbols for password:
~ Tilde
! Exclamation Mark
@ At sign
$ Dollar sign
^ Caret
( Opening Parenthesis
) Closing Parenthesis
_ Underscore
. Period

Confirm Password

Web Account created successfully

Xiying Hao,¹ Srimathie P. Indraratne,^1,* Robert E. Blackshaw¹

¹Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403-1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alb

^*Permanent address: Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Hao, X., Indraratne, S. P. and Blackshaw, R. E. 2012. Will genetically engineered crop production affect soil carbon? Can. J. Soil Sci. 92: 841-844. We investigated the responses to soil carbon after 8 yr of genetically engineered (GE) crop production. Soil organic carbon contents were similar, but d¹³C levels in SOC were lower in corn-canola rotation than in monoculture corn, whether GE or conventional crops were grown. GE crop production had no effect on soil carbon content and d¹³C level.

Citation Download Citation

Xiying Hao, Srimathie P. Indraratne, and Robert E. Blackshaw "Will genetically engineered crop production affect soil carbon?," Canadian Journal of Soil Science 92(6), 841-844, (1 November 2012). https://doi.org/10.1139/CJSS2011-072

Received: 13 July 2011; Accepted: 16 July 2012; Published: 1 November 2012