BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 14 May 2025 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
21 March 2024 Brushing aside doubts: an evaluation of the beat-sheet brushing technique for detecting the Nearctic tree trunk sheetweaver (Araneae: Linyphiidae)
Patrick S. Forsythe, Justice A. Saxby, Haillee R. Fritsch, Noah P. Hoffmann, Teona T. Ditzman, Deakyn J. Suess, Kelsey A. Radobicky, Bennett A. Schmitz, Samantha D. Amasone, Charles K. Buchmann, Laken T. Schultz, Addison L. Clauer, Allison S. Vista, April M. Kienbaum, Megan R. Ryan-Rabe, Brooklyn A.M. Monfils, Bryan A. Lara, Michael L. Draney
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

It is important to have reliable information on the presence/absence, population structure, and density of animals across their natural range. Detecting small organisms, however, such as the Nearctic tree trunk sheetweaver spider Drapetisca alteranda Chamberlin 1909 (Araneae: Linyphiidae), presents challenges due to its diminutive size and cryptic nature. We used a capture/recapture study to determine the detection and recapture probabilities of this spider using a standard beat sheet technique adopted for surveying tree trunks. Spiders were released on 3 different tree species that provided a range of microhabitats, including variable bark surface area and furrow depth/width. Microhabitat features played a small role in the timing of spider recapture (i.e., slower rate of recapture as furrowing increased). However, our results demonstrated 100% detection across replicate experiments and individual recapture probabilities exceeding 90% in most situations, with no significant differences in recapture observed among tree species and with respect to tree circumference. Furthermore, we show that most spiders could be recaptured within 2 sampling revolutions around the tree trunk, and there was no difference in the probability of collecting male and female spiders (although they differ markedly in size). Finally, we found no difference among brushers, supporting the idea that this method is replicable across collectors and studies. Collectively, we establish confidence in the ecological knowledge obtained with this technique and encourage its application with similar species and systems.

Patrick S. Forsythe, Justice A. Saxby, Haillee R. Fritsch, Noah P. Hoffmann, Teona T. Ditzman, Deakyn J. Suess, Kelsey A. Radobicky, Bennett A. Schmitz, Samantha D. Amasone, Charles K. Buchmann, Laken T. Schultz, Addison L. Clauer, Allison S. Vista, April M. Kienbaum, Megan R. Ryan-Rabe, Brooklyn A.M. Monfils, Bryan A. Lara, and Michael L. Draney "Brushing aside doubts: an evaluation of the beat-sheet brushing technique for detecting the Nearctic tree trunk sheetweaver (Araneae: Linyphiidae)," Environmental Entomology 53(3), 498-507, (21 March 2024). https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvae022
Received: 20 December 2023; Accepted: 5 March 2024; Published: 21 March 2024
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
arthropod sampling method
deciduous forest management
ecological sampling
forest ecology
population estimation
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top