Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2018 The Introduction and Establishment of Campsomeris dorsata (Hymenoptera: Scoliidae) in Florida
Anthony Abbate, Joshua Campbell, Jon Bremer, William H. Kern
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Campsomeris dorsata is a hymenopteran scoliid that is endemic to South America, Central America, and parts of the West Indies. It has been used as a biological control agent in the past in Puerto Rico, Mauritius, and Florida to aid in reducing coleopteran pests in sugar cane agricultural systems. The status of C. dorsata's establishment in Florida has been unknown since intentional introductions to sugar cane fields occurring during the 1930s. We surveyed primarily coastal sites throughout the state of Florida and captured 91 females ranging from Osceola County to Miami-Dade County (north vs south) and from Broward County to Collier County (east vs west). The results from this study show that C. dorsata is well established in these areas of Florida, and might still be an important biological control agent of white grubs in sugar cane as well as turf production and maintenance.

Scoliidae comprises about 560 species worldwide (Osten 2005), with 20 occurring in North America north of Mexico belonging to 5 genera: Campsomeris, Criscolia, Scolia, Trielis, and Triscolia (Krombein 1951, 1958, 1967; Betrem 1972). Wasps in this family are characteristically large, often brightly patterned, varying in color combinations of red, yellow, white, and black (Fig. 1). Scoliids are solitary parasitoids of soil-inhabiting scarab beetle larvae (Scarabaeidae) (DeBach 1964). Females burrow into the ground in search of these grubs where they sting, paralyze, and lay a single egg on their prey (Triplehorn & Johnson 2005). Scarabaeidae larvae cause damage to the roots of several plants including turf grass, various beans, tree seedlings, and sugar cane (Kuranaga 1994; Potter & Held 2002; Blossey & Hunt-Joshi 2003). Because these wasps attack scarab beetle larvae, they are considered important biological control agents (Williams 1919; Nagamine 1980; Misra 1996; Inoue & Endo 2006; Grissel 2007).

In Florida, 3 genera (Campsomeris, Scolia, and Trielis) represented by 8 species (C. fulvohirta Cresson, C. plumipes fossulana Fab., C. quadrimaculata Fab., C. trifasciata Saussure, S. bicincta Fab., S. dubia Say, S. nobilitata Fab., and T. octomaculata Say) are native to Florida (Grissell 2007). Arnett (2000) identified 2 other scoliid species (Campsomeris annulata Fab. and Campsomeris marginella modesta Smith) that had been introduced in the 1920s in the northeastern United States to control the Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica Newman) (Krombein 1948), but have not become established (Fleming 1968). Campsomeris dorsata Fab. has been used as a biological control agent in Puerto Rico, Mauritius, and United States mainland (Van Dine 1913; Jepson & Moutia 1939; Clausen 1956) to help combat sugar cane (Saccharum spp. [Poaceae]) pests including grubs of coleopterans in the subfamily Melolonthinae (Van Dine 1913), genus Phyllophaga (Van Dine 1913), and subgenus Phytalus (Jepson & Moutia 1939). Campsomeris dorsata is native to South America, Central America, and the West Indies (Bradley 1928), but has not been reported to be established in Florida. In 2016, Florida harvested about 161,874 ha of sugar cane equating to about 16,120,000 tons in yields, making it the leading sugar producing state in the United States. Florida produces about 25% of the sugar in the United States (Glaz et al. 2005), grossing about $450 million in 2008 (Baucum et al. 2009), and about $493 million in 2011 (USDA & NASS 2012). As stated previously, there are a number of insect pests adversely affecting sugar cane, and in 1934 and 1936, C. dorsata was imported from Puerto Rico to south Florida to help control these populations (Clausen 1956). Additionally, one other C. dorsata colonization event occurred in an area of Louisiana, but never became established (Clausen 1956).

Fig. 1.

Lateral (A) and dorsal view (B) of Campsomeris dorsata. Wasp is approximately 25 mm in length.

f01_543.jpg

Very few papers on C. dorsata have been published (Van Dine 1913; Bradley 1928; Jepson & Moutia 1939; Clausen 1956); although they provide important information on the biology of this species and its established ranges, they are outdated. The status of C. dorsata populations and establishment in Florida (and elsewhere) has been poorly documented. For this reason, it is unknown if C. dorsata had become established in Florida during its introduction in the 1930s or if it had become established more recently through other introduction events. Here, we present data that shows C. dorsata is most likely widely established throughout south Florida, and may have expanded well outside of sugar cane fields.

During Apr 2016 to Apr 2017 we conducted monthly bee and wasp trapping surveys throughout Florida, ranging from Franklin County to Collier County (east to west) and from Osceola County to Miami-Dade County (north to south) (Fig. 2). All C. dorsata specimens were collected from areas that contained deep sandy soils with the use of pan traps (Droege 2009) and vane traps (Stephen & Rao 2005). A total of 91 female C. dorsata specimens (no males collected) were collected throughout the survey period (65 in Miami-Dade County, 17 in Broward County, 4 in Osceola County, 3 in Lee County, and 2 in Collier County). Campsomeris dorsata were most abundant in Miami-Dade County and least abundant in Collier County. There is virtually no sugar cane production in Miami-Dade County, but landscape and sports turf is a dominant land cover in this highly urbanized county (Hodges & Stevens 2010). Therefore, turf grasses in urban areas may be an important habitat for white grubs and C. dorsata (Buss & Dale 2017). Because C. dorsata is endemic to South America, Central America, and the West Indies, climactic conditions might be more suitable in south Florida opposed to northern counties of the state. Additionally, we observed higher populations of C. dorsata during the fall and winter months, that might be related with greater abundance of their overwintering larval hosts. However, we did not measure prey availability and this needs to be investigated further. Most of the sugar cane agricultural systems are located in the south central part of the state located in the Everglades Agricultural Area around Lake Okeechobee. The Everglades Agricultural Area also is one of the major turf production areas of Florida. Future work should focus on surveying these areas to determine if populations of C. dorsata have been established within the Everglades Agricultural Area. Future work also should focus on surveying areas north of Osceola County to determine their most northern range, because it will be of value to the scientific community, as well as sugar cane and turf industries. Future research also should determine whether this non-native species is having any competitive impact on the native scoliids, tiphiids (Tiphiidae), and other soil-inhabiting arthropods.

Fig. 2.

Sites throughout Florida where Campsomeris dorsata were collected. Study sites ranged from Broward County to Collier County (east to west) and from Osceola County to Miami-Dade County (north to south).

f02_543.jpg

We thank the University of Florida for funding this project, and to Kevin Henson who graciously provided us with data from Osceola County. We appreciate the Florida Park Service who allowed us to survey in their state parks during the course of this study, and Chase Kimmel for GIS support.

References Cited

1.

Arnett RH. 2000. Hymenoptera, pp. 531–611 In American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA Google Scholar

2.

Baucum LE, Rice RW, Schueneman TJ. 2009. An overview of Florida sugarcane. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Report Publication #SS-AGR-232. Google Scholar

3.

Betrem JG. 1972. The African Campsomerinae. Monograph Nederlandse Entomology 6: 1–326. Google Scholar

4.

Blossey B, Hunt-Joshi TR. 2003. Belowground herbivory by insects: influence on plants and aboveground herbivores. Annual Review of Entomology 48: 521–547. Google Scholar

5.

Bradley JC. 1928. The species of Campsomeris of the Plumipes Group, inhabiting the United States, the Greater Antilles, and the Bahama Islands. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of Philadelphia 80: 313–337. Google Scholar

6.

Buss EA, Dale AG. 2017. Insect Pest Management on Turfgrass. ENY-300. Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Extension. Google Scholar

7.

Clausen CP. 1956. Biological control of insect pests in the continental United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1139: 42–62. Google Scholar

8.

DeBach P. 1964. Successes, trends and future possibilities, pp. 693–705 In De-Bach P [ed.], Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Reinhold and Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

9.

Droege S. 2009. The very handy bee manual: how to catch and identify bees and manage a collection.  http://www.nbii.gov/images/uploaded/152986_1244054830561_Handy_Bee_Manual_Jun_2009.pdf (last accessed 19 Feb 2018). Google Scholar

10.

Fleming WE. 1968. Biological Control of the Japanese Beetle. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1383. Google Scholar

11.

Glaz B, Tai PY, Comstock JC, Miller JD, Edme SJ, Gilbert R, Davidson J. 2005. Evaluation of new canal point sugarcane clones: 2002-2003 harvest season. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland, USA. Google Scholar

12.

Grissell EE. 2007. Scoliid Wasps of Florida, Campsomeris, Scolia, and Trielis spp. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Scoliidae). Featured Creatures, DPI Entomology Circulars 179. Google Scholar

13.

Hodges AW, Stevens TJ. 2010. Economic Contributions of the Turfgrass Industry in Florida. Final Project Report to the Florida Turfgrass Association.  http://www.fred.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/economic-impact-analysis/Turfgrass%20Florida%202007.pdf (last accessed 1 Mar 2018) Google Scholar

14.

Inoue M, Endo T. 2006. Spatiotemporal distribution and resource use of scoliid wasps (Hymenoptera) in coastal sand dunes. Entomological Science 9: 359–371. Google Scholar

15.

Krombein KV. 1948. Liberation of oriental scolioid wasps in the United States from 1920 to 1946. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 41: 58–62. Google Scholar

16.

Krombein KV. 1951. Scoliidae. In Muesebeck CFW, Krombein KV, Townes H [eds.], Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico, synoptic catalog. U.S. Department of Agriculture Monograph 2. Google Scholar

17.

Krombein KV. 1958. Scoliidae. In Muesebeck CFW, Krombein KV, Townes H [eds.], Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico, synoptic catalog. U.S. Department of Agriculture Monograph 2, Suppl. 1. Google Scholar

18.

Krombein KV. 1967. Scoliidae. In Muesebeck CFW, Krombein KV, Townes H [eds.], Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico, synoptic catalog. U.S. Department of Agriculture Monograph 2, Suppl. 2. Google Scholar

19.

Kuranaga Z. 1994. Root-feeding pests. Outline of ecology and control, pp. 369–370 In Kobayashi F, Taketani A [eds.], Forest Insects. Yokendo, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar

20.

Jepson WF, Moutia LA. 1939. The progress of applied entomology in Mauritius during the years 1933 to 1938, with reference to insects of sugar cane. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 6: 377–382. Google Scholar

21.

Misra RM. 1996. Some observations on the life history and behaviour of Scolia (Discolia) affinis Guerin (Hymenoptera: Scoliidae) a parasite of Holotrichia consanguinea Blanch (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Indian Forester 122: 1174–1178. Google Scholar

22.

Nagamine M. 1980. Biology and habits of Campsomeris annulata (Hymenoptera: Scoliidae), a monoparasitic ectoparasite of a sugarcane white grub, Anomala albopilosa (Coleoptera: Rutelidae). Bulletin of Okinawa Agricultural Experiment Station 5: 45–51. Google Scholar

23.

Osten T. 2005. Checkliste der Dolchwespen der Welt (Insecta: Hymenoptera, Scoliidae). Bericht der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Augsburg 62: 1–62. Google Scholar

24.

Potter DA, Held DW. 2002. Biology and management of the Japanese beetle. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 47: 175–205. Google Scholar

25.

Stephen WP, Rao S. 2005. Unscented color traps for non-Apis bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 78: 373–380. Google Scholar

26.

Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF. 2005. Introduction to the Study of Insects. 7th edition. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, California, USA. Google Scholar

28.

Van Dine DL. 1913. The insects affecting sugar cane in Puerto Rico. Journal of Economic Entomology 6: 251–257. Google Scholar

29.

Williams FX. 1919. Philippine wasp studies. Part 2. Descriptions of new species and life history studies, pp. 19–186 In Bulletin of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association Experiment Station, No. 14. Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. Google Scholar
Anthony Abbate, Joshua Campbell, Jon Bremer, and William H. Kern "The Introduction and Establishment of Campsomeris dorsata (Hymenoptera: Scoliidae) in Florida," Florida Entomologist 101(3), 543-545, (1 September 2018). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0334
Published: 1 September 2018
KEYWORDS
avispa
biological control
caña de azúcar
césped
Control biológico
dunas
Dunes
Back to Top