Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
30 December 2023 Three new smooth-spored species of Inocybe, two new epitypes, and updates on earlier epitypifications
Ditte Bandini, Giovanni Bandini, Konstanze Bensch, Francisco J. Rodríguez Campo, Bernd Oertel, François Valade, Ursula Eberhardt
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Three new smooth-spored species of Inocybe are described based on detailed morphological and molecular investigation: Inocybe bonii, I. carolina and I. centesima. The new species are presented with a detailed description, macroscopic and microscopic photographs, as well as drawings of microscopic details. For two species, I. albomarginata and I. rufuloides, epitypes were selected, and a description and a figure plate of each of them are provided. Furthermore, a portrait of I. amblyospora is given, a species that has often been confused with I. albomarginata. Based on our studies, we affirm that I. reducta and I. albomarginata are synonymous. All named species are supported by phylogenetic analyses. Lectotypifications that were missing so far (I. geophylla, I. hirtella, I. tigrina and I. transitoria) are now supplied. The typification information is amended for I. tarda and corrected for I. griseovelata.

Auf der Basis detaillierter morphologischer und molekularer Untersuchungen werden drei neue glattsporige Arten von Inocybe beschrieben: Inocybe bonii, I. carolina und I. centesima. Die neuen Arten werden mit ausführlicher Beschreibung, makroskopischen und mikroskopischen Fotos sowie Zeichnungen der mikroskopischen Details präsentiert. Für zwei Arten, I. albomarginata und I. rufuloides, wurden Epitypen gewählt und jeweils eine ausführliche Beschreibung und eine Tafel angefertigt. Außerdem wurde ein weiteres Porträt einer Art gegeben, die oft mit I. albomarginata verwechselt wurde und wird: Inocybe amblyospora. Basierend auf unseren Studien bestätigen wir die Synonymie von I. reducta und I. albomarginata. Alle genannten Arten werden durch phylogenetische Analysen gestützt. Fehlende Lektotypifizierungen für I. geophylla, I. hirtella, I. tigrina und I. transitoria werden nachgeholt. Die Angaben zur Typifizierung von I. tarda werden ergänzt und für I. griseovelata berichtigt.

Introduction

The three species described here as new belong to the genus Inocybe, which is the largest of the seven genera in the family Inocybaceae (Matheny et al. 2020). The genus continues to grow, with several new species described from all over the world almost on a monthly basis. In the last five years alone, about 150 new species, all of them sequenced, have been published (e.g., Larsson et al. 2018a, 2018b; Matheny & Swenie 2018; Bandini et al. 2019a, 2019b, 2019c; Cripps et al. 2019b; Matheny & Kudzma 2019; Bandini et al. 2020a, 2020b, 2020c; 2021a, 2021b, 2021c; Cervini 2021; Crous et al. 2021; Dovana et al. 2021; Marchetti et al. 2021; Mešić et al. 2021; Bandini et al. 2022a, 2022b, 2022c; Crous et al. 2022; He et al. 2022; Bandini et al. 2023; Pošta et al. 2023; Rodríguezcampo et al. 2023). Given that there are many parts of the world, for instance China, where there are no reliable estimates of the actual number of species (see, e.g., Fan & Bau 2010, 2013, 2020; Fan et al. 2018), and given the number of species in the databases, the total number of species is much higher (see Bhunjun et al. 2022).

The genus Inocybe s. str. is characterized, e.g., by the mostly thick-walled cheilocystidia and also mostly thick-walled pleurocystidia. Species with this combination of characters do not occur in the other six genera of the family (Matheny et al. 2020). The genus can be further divided into species that have either no metuloid caulocystidia or metuloid caulocystidia only near the apex, and those that have metuloid caulocystidia on the entire length of the stipe—usually visible as a fine pruina with the naked eye or with a magnifying glass. Whereas there are many species that have a distinctly pruinose stipe only near the apex, such as for instance species of the I. flocculosa or I. cincinnata groups, there are others that always have a distinctly pruinose stipe over its entire length, such as I. subbrunnea Kühner or I. hirtella Bres. However, there are other species whose stipe is variable from pruinose only near the apex or down to the middle, or over its entire length; among the best-known examples of these are I. sindonia (Fr.) P. Karst. (see Kuyper 1986; Bandini et al. 2022b) and I. nitidiuscula (Britzelm.) Lapl. (DB, personal observation). There are also species whose stipe is pruinose over its entire length but in the lower half sometimes rather sparsely so. Thus, at first glance, the stipes of some basidiomata of these species seem to be pruinose only near the apex. This is the case, e.g., with the recently described I. beatifica Bandini & B. Oertel (Bandini et al. 2021c) or I. jucunda Bandini, B. Oertel & U. Eberh. (Bandini et al. 2021a).

Fig. 1.

ML topology resulting from analysis of combined ITS and partial LSU sequences of Inocybe treated or discussed here. Clades of species that are described here as new are highlighted in yellow; species clades for which type material is described here are highlighted in blue. Sequences taken from Matheny et al. (2020) are indicated by *. Arrow 1: Inocybe (genus), arrow 2: “smooth-spored temperate boreal clade” (Matheny et al. 2020). Support values from 5,000 replicates of SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT) support, 5,000 replicates of ultrafast bootstrap (ufb), and BI posterior probabilies (pp) indicated at the branches in this order. # indicating 100% or 1 support, + indicating values ≥ 80% SH-aLRT, ≥ 95% ufb or ≥ 0.95 pp.

img-z2-1_01.jpg

(cont.)

img-z3-1_01.jpg

(cont.)

img-z5-1_01.jpg

We included in this article species from three of the above-listed groups: the stipe of I. carolina is pruinose always only near the apex, the stipe of I. bonii is pruinose over its entire length but sometimes only sparsely so in the lower half, possibly giving the impression that the stipe is pruinose only near the apex, while the stipe of I. centesima is always distinctly pruinose along its entire length—at least when young. With age, caulocystidia may be rubbed off in the lower half of the stipe by adhering sand particles. The extent of pruinosity is a crucial question in keys (Kuyper 1986; Stangl 1989; Bon 1997a, 1997b, 1998), and is therefore of importance in the determination of species of the genus Inocybe.

Inocybe bonii has rather small spores and thus compares to other species with an entirely pruinose stipe and small spores, such as I. albomarginata Velen., I. amblyospora Kühner and I. pseudoreducta Stangl & Glowinski. In the past, these three species have sometimes been confused [see for instance the synonymization of I. pseudoreducta with I. albomarginata in LUDWIG (2017)]. We have studied the types of I. albomarginata and I. amblyospora. In order to give a clearer picture of these species, we included below complete morphological descriptions for each of them.

All three species described here as new grow on calcareous soil: The holotype of I. carolina was found in an old limestone quarry near Madrid in Spain, and the paratypes of the species from Austria stemmed from a calcareous pebbled terrain on the border of a road near the river Lech. Both habitats are extremely dry and hot at times because of being exposed to the sun. The holotype and one paratype of I. bonii (see below) were found on the Swabian Jura in Germany, a mountain range the geology of which is mostly limestone from the Jurassic period with dry soil conditions, and I. centesima was found on an inland shell limestone sand dune originating from the last glacial period. Even in its current circumscription (Matheny et al. 2020), Inocybe is a genus that includes species that are rather divergent in their nuclear ribosomal genes. A satisfactory, comprehensive modern infrageneric classification based on phylogeny has not been reached so far. Thus, we continue to refer to Bon's (1997a, 1997b, 1998) classification as a guide through this large genus, even if it does not include any southern hemisphere Inocybe.

The selection of taxa considered in the analyses was largely driven by the species mentioned here, enriched with taxa used by Matheny et al. (2020) to delimit the genus. Although the molecular infrageneric classification of the genus remains a challenge, in our experience, good morphologically distinguishable Inocybe species do not share the same ITS sequence with other species of Inocybe [see Marchetti et al. (2021) for a diverging opinion based, however, on data from other genera, e.g., Hebeloma, Cor-tinarius and Pluteus].

Species delimitation followed the same principles used in earlier publications (Bandini et al. 2021c, 2022b), namely that species are described as new if they differ from existing species by the combination of at least three independent characteristics that are constant among representatives of the new species, and the representatives of the new species are monophyletic in phylogenetic ITS (ITS + LSU) analyses. Constant ecological differences between new and existing species are considered as meaningful, but neither ecological nor ITS differences were used unless supported by morphological differences. Taxa were considered as synonymous if the overall impression of the species was very similar, if no constant characteristics could be found that separated the two species, and if neither pronounced ecological preferences nor molecular data (if available) indicated that the two species might be different (Bandini et al. 2021c).

Already in earlier publications (Bandini et al. 2021a, 2022a, 2022b), we began to designate epitypes in cases where the appraisal of the status of more recent names required the clarification of old names and the existing types did not show sufficient characters for species distinction. Important characters for species identification and delimitation that are often not observable in old material and not explicitly mentioned in species descriptions are associated with the caulocystidia at the top of the stipe. The features of the caulocystidia directly below the lamellae form a character that we started to use relatively recently (Bandini et al. 2017) but that we have since found to be very useful for species recognition in Inocybe. Here, we decided to select epitypes for I. albomarginata and I. rufuloides. The holotype of I. albomarginata is immersed in formaldehyde and therefore almost an amorphous mass, making it impossible to study the caulocystidia; moreover, it is preserved in a bottle together with several other species of other genera. The holotype of I. rufuloides, a species growing alongside I. centesima in good years, has defied sequencing attempts by several experts. Moreover, the material is in bad condition so that not all microscopic characters important for differentiation from other species could be determined, such as, e.g., the often catenate, often slightly thick-walled paracystidia or caulocystidia directly below the lamellae.

We furthermore supplied lectotypes for I. geophylla, I. hirtella, I. tigrina and I. transitoria that ought to have been assigned earlier, when these taxa were epitypified. For old taxa, it is often difficult to know whether syntypes exist. Epitypes only serve as interpretative types for the material that is cited in the epitypification and not for syntypes. Lectotypification is necessary to preclude the occurrence of competing epitypes. We also used the opportunity to amend the typification information for I. tarda and correct it for I. griseovelata.

Fig. 2.

Inocybe albomarginata. a. Epitype, scale bar: 1 cm. b. Coll. DB21-10-13-1, scale bar: 1 cm. c. Cheilocystidium (coll. DB1-6-13-19), scale bar: 10 µm. d. Microscopic characters (epitype); Ca = Caulocystidia, Cpa = Cauloparacystidia, Ch = Cheilocystidia, Pa = Paracystidia, Pl = Pleurocystidia, Sp = Spores; scale bar spores: 10 µm, scale bar cystidia: 50 µm. e. Spores (coll. DB1-6-13-19), scale bar: 10 µm.

img-z6-1_01.jpg

Material and methods

Morphological study

Fresh materials were obtained on forays in Austria, France, Germany and Spain between 2017 and 2021. For fresh collections, the relevant macroscopic details, i.e., habit, size and shape of the basidiomata, colour and surface of the pileus, number and colour of the lamellae, size, colour, surface and base of the stipe, smell and colour of the flesh, colour of the exsiccata, habitat and surrounding trees, were noted.

For all collections—if possible in the fresh, otherwise in the dried state—basidia, spores, hymenial cystidia, caulocystidia etc. were examined by D. Bandini with a Leica DM-750 microscope, in water and in a 3% KOH solution, at 400× and 1,000× magnifications. Photographs of microscopic details were taken by D. Bandini with a Zeiss AxioCam ERc5s. The measurements of spores and cystidia were determined using Zeiss Axiovision version 4.8. Cystidia were measured without crystals and basidia without sterigmata. The size of all elements measured is given as length × width. The Q value equals the ratio of spore length to spore width (calculated for each spore). The number of spores or cystidia measured is included in the descriptions.

The macroscopic photographs of I. carolina (Fig. 5a, b) were taken by F. J. Rodríguez Campo with a Nikon D300S with Micro-Nikkor 105 mm lens, and the photograph in Fig. 4b of I. bonii was taken by F. Valade with a Canon EOS 80D + 60 mm macro lens. All other macrophotographs were taken by D. Bandini with a Panasonic Lumix GH2 with Leica DG Macro-Elmarit 1:2.8/45 mm lens. For the determination of colour temperature, a calibration card was photographed together with the fresh collections at the collection site. The RAW files were developed with Silkypix Developer Studio 4.0.

All drawings of microscopic details were done by D. Bandini. Colour codes were taken from Munsell (2009, as “Mu”); terminology follows Vellinga (1988) and Kuyper (1986). Herbarium acronyms are according to Holmgren et al. (1990); D.B./DB refers to the private herbarium of Ditte Bandini, PRC to the private herbarium of F.J. Rodríguez Campo, and FV to the private herbarium of F. Valade.

Molecular study

DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing of nrDNA ITS and LSU followed the protocols published by Cripps et al. (2019a) and Bandini et al. (2021c). For epitypes and other material processed in Stuttgart, DNA extracts are available at the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (Germany, SMNS) for the generation of sequences from other DNA regions as needed. Bidirectional sequencing was carried out by LGC Genomics (Berlin, Germany). Sequence editing and assembly were done in Sequencher v. 4.9 (Genecodes). Newly generated sequences were submitted to GenBank with acc. no. OR102467–OR102487. The new sequence with GenBank acc. no. OQ546722 was generated in the CEFE lab in Montpellier (France), the sequences with GenBank acc. no OR100607, OR100705, OR102492 and OR102493 were generated by Alvalab (Oviedo, Spain).

Sequences were blasted against GenBank (Johnson et al. 2008) and in Geneious R10 (Biomatters) against the “Full “UNITE+INSD” dataset” (Abarenkov et al. 2022), in order to find additional records for the species treated here and putative close relatives. The majority of the close relatives were found among taxa treated in earlier publications (Bandini et al. 2021c, 2022a, 2022b; Vauras & Larsson 2016), so that for each species, the inclusion of a single full-length sequence (ITS + LSU approx. 1400 bp) or the type sequence plus one full length sequence, if available, was considered sufficient. Only for direct sister species of any of the target species three sequences were included. For every species [or species hypothesis—see Kõljalg et al. (2005)] included, we selected one to three representative sequences for the tree analyses by length (inclusion of LSU), quality and preferred, if available, sequences from types and studied material, i.e., from other molecular systematic studies, preferentially selecting basidiome over EcM or root tip sequences, and the latter over soil sample data.

Sequence similarity or identity values were directly copied from BLAST results. Percent values given in the text refer to ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 or fewer positions if the complete sequence was unavailable for at least one of the sequences. Conspecificity between public sequences and sequences of types was assumed if sequence variation was 1% or less. This value was selected to be smaller than the 98.5% cut-off value proposed by several authors (Lücking et al. 2020 and references therein), to be used as general cut-off values for ITS variation to distinguish between species. Sequence variation attributed to long indels, stretches of N (i.e., in cases in which the ITS was obtained in two amplicons, not allowing to read the entire ITS) or obviously wrong sequence reads in the beginnings or ends of published sequences were ignored. Information on distribution beyond the information from our own data was obtained from UNITE species hypotheses (sh) v. 9.0 (Kõljalg et al. 2013; Abarenkov et al. 2022). Correspondence of species with UNITE sh was assumed if the query sequence had a 100% or 99.7% matching sequence present in the sh.

For species described as new, we aimed at having at least three collections sequenced for ITS and LSU, provided sufficiently many collections were available for sequencing. Representatives of published sequences from collections putatively belonging to these taxa or very close relatives of these taxa (i.e., > 97% similar in BLAST results) were also included.

The alignment was carried out in MAFFT v. 7 using the E-INS-i option (Katoh et al. 2005, 2019), adding the ITS and LSU sequences considered by Matheny et al. (2020) for defining Inocybe to our own dataset to create a backbone for the tree. Pseudosperma spurium (Jacobsson & E. Larss.) Matheny & Esteve-Rav. was used for rooting.

The entire alignment was treated as a single partition. All positions were included in the analysis. ML analyses were run in IQ-TREE v. 1.6 (Nguyen et al. 2015) online (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016), with standard settings. Branch support was obtained through 5,000 replicates of UFBoot (Minh et al. 2013; Hoang et al. 2018) and SH-aLRT (Guindon et al. 2010).

Bayesian inference (BI) was done in MrBayes 3.2.7a (Ronquist et al. 2012) using Beagle (Ayres et al. 2012) on CIPRES (Miller et al. 2010). The BI analysis was carried out in two runs with four chains including one heated chain each, using the GTRINVGAMMA model, default priors and sampling one tree of each run every 1,000 generations. The analysis stopped employing default stop rule parameters after 2.005 million generations (Ronquist et al. 2020). The first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in.

The tree was visualized using FigTree v. 1.4.4 (Rambaut 2006–2018). Support values were noted as SH-aLRT support [%], ultrafast bootstrap (ufb) support [%] and BI posterior probability (pp). SH-aLRT support ≥ 80%, ufb support ≥ 95% and pp ≥ 0.95 are indicated at the branches. Alignment and tree files are available in TreeBASE at http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S30548.

Fig. 3.

Inocybe amblyospora. a. Coll. DB17-9-18-9, scale bar: 1 cm. b. Coll. DB20-8-12-12, scale bar: 1 cm. c. Cheilocystidia (coll. DB20-8-12-12), scale bar: 10 µm. d. Microscopic characters (coll. DB17-9-18-9); Ca = Caulocystidia, Cpa = Cauloparacystidia, Ch = Cheilocystidia, Pa = Paracystidia, Pl = Pleurocystidia, Sp = Spores; scale bar spores: 10 µm, scale bar cystidia: 50 µm. e. Spores (coll. DB20-8-12-12), scale bar: 10 µm.

img-z8-1_01.jpg

Specimen depositories

Herbarium acronyms are according to Holmgren et al. (1990) except D.B., which refers to the private herbarium of Ditte Bandini.

Results

In the taxonomy section, all species are listed that are either newly described, newly typified or for which earlier typifications are updated.

The molecular results are shown in Fig. 1. All of the species discussed in detail in this paper are supported as members of the genus Inocybe and belonging to the “smooth-spored temperate boreal clade”, here receiving 88/96/0.96 support, as defined by Matheny et al. (2020).

Sequences included in the phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 1) are listed in Appendix 1. The final alignment included 145 sequences and 2,314 positions. The result of the ML analysis is depicted in Fig. 1. The consensus tree resulting from the BI analysis was generally similar to the ML result and differed only in clades not supported in either of the analyses.

The clade including I. bonii and a supported clade of soil sequences (that form a clade with 97/100/1 support) received 99/100/1 support. The sequences known to represent I. bonii morphologically (plus two non-specimen derived sequences) and highlighted as I. bonii in Fig. 1 (part 2) form a hardly diverging unsupported clade, sister to the above-mentioned soil sequences clade. Sequences of I. carolina s. l. form a clade that received 85/100/0.96 support (Fig. 1, part 4). The clade of I. carolina s. str. (indicated as I. carolina in Fig. 1) received 89/100/1 support. The sequences of I. centesima form a clade with 94/99/1 support; the sister clade consisting of soil sequences is also well supported (96/100/1) and likely represents an unknown taxon. Inocybe rufuloides sequences form a clade with 97/100/1 support (Fig. 1, part 3). The I. rufuloides species clade has a sister clade (84/100/0.97) consisting of soil sequences that are considered to represent a different taxon. What we here consider as I. amblyospora (clade support 87/100/1) is phylogenetically related to I. albomarginata (clade support 100/100/1); the two species are resolved within the same clade together with, e.g., I. angulatosquamulosa and I. flavoalbida, but not as direct sister species (Fig. 1, part 2).

The only supported clade (Fig. 1, part 1) within this tree that included I. centesima and other named species (with 94/99/0.97 support, from I. subbrunnea down to I. metrodii) encompassed species such as I. splendens, I. phaeoleuca and I. furfurea. The position of I. centesima within this clade is unresolved, i.e., its phylogeny is unsupported in relation to named species. Inocybe bonii is supported in a clade with I. glabripes (100/100/1 support) (Fig. 1, part 2). Inocybe albomarginata and I. amblyospora were included in the same clade, with 98/100/1 support; the entire clade also included I. pseudoreducta and an unnamed species (represented by UBC-F19656) and received 96/99/1 support (Fig. 1, part 2). Inocybe carolina (Fig. 1, part 4) was included in a clade with, e.g., I. flocculosa (support 98.100/1); the entire clade from I. cinncinata down to I. carolina received 96/99/0.98 support. Inocybe rufuloides (Fig. 1, part 3) was well supported (97/100/1) within a group of species including I. coriacea Bandini, B. Oertel & U. Eberh., I. filiana Bandini, B. Oertel & U. Eberh. and a number of sequences of unknown species, but following the support towards the backbone of the tree, support especially from SH-aLRT was rather low in some cases. Support from ufb suggested a relationship with, e.g., I. tarda (81/98/-), whereas support from pp with I. glabrescens.

Taxonomy

Inocybe albomarginata Velen., České Houby 2: 379 (1920) (Figs. 2, 8a, c)

  • Heterotypic synonym: Inocybe reducta J.E. Lange, Fl. Agaric. Danic. 5(Taxon. Consp.): V, 101 (1940).

  • Selected description and iconography: Velenovský (1920–1922); Lange (1940, as “I. reducta”); Kuyper (1986); Stangl (1989).

  • Typification

  • Lectotype designated by Kuyper (1985: 376): CZECH REPUBLIC, Prag, Mnichovice, in Betuletum above railway (viam ferream), Aug. 1915 [leg. J. Velenovský] (PRC-bottle n°119).

  • Epitype (designated here; MBT 10014037) NETHERLANDS, Drenthe, Assen, park of hospital, alt. 15 m, Quercus robur, 3 Oct. 2019, leg. D. Bandini & E. Arnolds (STU SMNS-STU-F-0901739; dupl. priv. herb. DB DB3-10-19-14).

  • Description

  • Pileus 20–45 mm wide, (sub)globose or subcampanulate when young, later broadly convex or expanded, often somewhat deformed, with or without a low, large umbo, margin at first slightly to strongly inflexed, later decurved and with age straight to even uplifted, and then depressed around the centre; no remnants of a velipellis observed; colour mostly brown with reddish to red-brown hue (Mu 7.5YR 4/4–4/6, 5/4–5/8), rarely somewhat paler and with ochraceous tinge (Mu 10YR 5/4–5/8), sometimes darker to almost blackish brown at the centre and often somewhat speckled with fine darker fibre bundles on paler ones, margin sometimes much paler with age; surface at first glabrous, then finely innately fibrillose to rimulose near the margin, but often also strongly rimose with fibres diverging and showing the lighter-coloured context beneath; when aging at the centre, usually areolate-diffracted or somewhat cracked or “scabby” or breaking up in small particles; no cortina observed. Lamellae moderately crowded [c. 40–50 (60), l = 1–3], often uneven, slightly thick, adnexed to adnate, usually very flat, even to subventricose, at first whitish, later beige to pale ochraceous; edge whitish. Stipe 30–60 × 2–6 mm, straight or curved and often widening towards the base, base usually thickened to (sub)bulbous, sometimes with a rather thick bulb (up to 10 mm), when young entirely covered with thin whitish tomentum, later longitudinally striate or glabrous, flesh-coloured to brown or reddish brown, up to dark reddish brown or red-brown with age; pruinose along entire length, but more densely so in the upper half of the stipe and sometimes seemingly only near the apex. Context whitish in the pileus, at first whitish in the stipe, with age brownish in the cortex and sometimes streakily brownish also in the stipe, base remaining whitish. Smell spermatic, at least when cut. Colour of exsiccata. Pileus brown to dark brown with reddish hue (Mu 5YR 4/4–4/6, 3/3–3/4), lamellae somewhat lighter, stipe concolorous or a little lighter, no darkening or blackening on drying.

  • Spores 5.9–9.5 µm (av. 7.3 µm, SD 0.7 µm) × 3.7–5.0 µm (av. 4.3 µm, SD 0.3 µm); Q = 1.4–2.1 (av. 1.7, SD 0.1) (n = 120 of 3 coll.), smooth, subamygdaloid, sometimes oblong, occasionally with a faint suprahilar depression, apex mostly subobtuse. Basidia 25–30 × 7–9 µm, generally 4-spored. Pleurocystidia 36–79 µm (av. 56 µm, SD 10 µm) × 11–24 µm (av. 15 µm, SD 3 µm); Q = 2.3–6.1 (av. 3.7, SD 1.0) (n = 45 of 3 coll.), mostly subfusiform to (sub)utriform, usually without or with only a short neck, at the apex generally wide, with a short pedicel, apex usually crystalliferous, mostly rather thin-walled and walls rather uniformly thick near bulge and apex, but with only few small crystals, walls up to 1.5 (2.0) µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size, intermixed with colourless (sub)clavate, thin-walled paracystidia. Pileipellis constituted by an epicutis made up of parallel hyphae 4–11 µm wide, with finely encrusting and parietal brown pigment, subcutis with wider and paler to colourless elements. Caulocystidia descending the entire length of the stipe but sometimes sparsely so on the lower half, 30–65 × 9–20 µm, mostly ventricose (sub)utriform or (sub)fusiform, sometimes deformed, without or with only a short neck and with a short pedicel, apex with or without small crystals; walls up to 0.5 (1.0) µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH; intermixed with colourless, (sub)clavate, thin-walled cauloparacystidia. Clamp connections abundant in all tissues.

  • Habitat and distribution

  • Inocybe albomarginata was found by us with frondose trees, often in park-like terrain on calcareous soil. Judging from the collection data, the species appears to often associate with Quercus. Our own collections are from Austria, Germany and The Netherlands. The corresponding species hypothesis (SH0740134.09FU, 2.0 %) includes sequences from Czechia, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Italy, Latvia, The Netherlands, Pakistan, Russia, Sweden and Turkey. The species seems to be widespread, ranging from Europe to south Asia and quite common.

  • Type specimens examined

  • Lectotype of I. albomarginata (PRC-bottle n°119) (Fig. 8a): Spores 6.4–7.8 µm (av. 7.1 µm, SD 0.3 µm) × 3.8–4.5 µm (av. 4.2 µm, SD 0.2 µm); Q = 1.6–1.9 (av. 1.7, SD 0.1) (n = 40), smooth, subamygdaloid, sometimes oblong, occasionally with a faint suprahilar depression, apex subobtuse. Basidia 4-spored. Pleurocystidia 32–58 µm (av. 46 µm, SD 7 µm) × 11–17 µm (av. 14 µm, SD 2 µm); Q = 2.5–5.2 (av. 3.3, SD 0.6) (n = 40)], mostly (sub)fusiform or (sub)utriform, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 1.0 (1.5) µm thick at the apex, yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size. Paracystidia (sub)clavate, colourless, thin-walled. Caulocystidia not studied (because in a bad condition).

  • Syntype of I. reducta (Fig. 8c): DENMARK, Husmandskolen near Odense, Sep. 1938, [leg. J.E. LANGE] (C-F-67157). Spores 6.5–8.0 µm (av. 7.2 µm, SD 0.3 µm) × 4.0–5.0 µm (av. 4.3 µm, SD 0.2 µm); Q = 1.5–1.8 (av. 1.6, SD 0.1) (n = 40), smooth, subamygdaloid, sometimes oblong, occasionally with a faint suprahilar depression, apex subobtuse. Basidia 4-spored. Pleurocystidia 44–57 µm (av. 51 µm, SD 5 µm) × 13–17 µm (av. 15 µm, SD 1 µm); Q = 2.9–3.8 (av. 3.4, SD 0.3) (n = 40), mostly (sub)fusiform or (sub)utriform, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 1.0 (1.5) µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size. Paracystidia (sub)clavate, colourless, thin-walled. Caulocystidia not studied (to preserve the material).

  • Epitype of I. albomarginata (Figs. 2a, d): Spores 6.2–9.1 µm (av. 7.2 µm, SD 0.5 µm) × 3.7–4.8 µm (av. 4.3 µm, SD 0.3 µm); Q = 1.4–1.9 (av. 1.6, SD 0.1) (n = 40), smooth, subamygdaloid, sometimes oblong, occasionally with a faint suprahilar depression, apex (sub)obtuse. Basidia 4-spored. Pleurocystidia 42–71 µm (av. 54 µm, SD 10 µm) × 13–17 µm (av. 14 µm, SD 1 µm); Q = 2.5–5.5 (av. 3.8, SD 0.9) (n = 40), mostly (sub)fusiform or (sub) utriform, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 1.5 (2.0) µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size. Paracystidia (sub) clavate, colourless, thin-walled. Caulocystidia on entire length of the stipe, 35–60 × 9–15 (20) µm, mostly ventricose (sub)utriform or (sub)fusiform.

  • Selected additional specimens examined

  • AUSTRIA, Tirol, Imst, Silz, ÖK25V 2221-Ost, alt. 660 m, riparian forest with Tilia sp., Pinus sylvestris, Fraxinus sp., Populus sp., 11 Sep. 2017, leg. D. Bandini (SMNS-STU-F-0901740, DB11-9-17-13). GERMANY, Baden-Württemberg, Karlsruhe, Erzbergerstr., TK25 6916/3, alt. 118 m, lawn with Quercus petraea, Fagus sylvatica, Carpinus sylvaticus, 1 Jun. 2013, leg. D. Bandini & B. Oertel (DB1-6-13-19). Nordrhein-Westfalen, Siegen-Wittgenstein, Freudenberg, Rest stop Siegerland, TK25 5013/3, Fagus sylvatica, Corylus avellana, 21 Oct. 2013, leg. D. Bandini (DB21-10-13-1). NETHERLANDS, Drenthe, Assen, park of hospital, alt. 15 m, Quercus robur, 3 Oct. 2019, leg. D. Bandini & E. Arnolds (DB3-10-19-14). Drenthe, Gijsselte, alt. 15 m, Quercus robur, 6 Oct. 2020, leg. D. Bandini (DB6-10-20-6). Drenthe, Diever, alt. 16 m, Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Quercus robur, Fagus sylvatica, 8 Oct. 2020, leg. D. Bandini (DB8-10-20-1). Ibidem, alt. 15 m, Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Quercus robur, Fagus sylvatica, 8 Oct. 2020, leg. D. Bandini (DB8-10-20-13).

  • Notes

  • The lectotype of I. albomarginata is preserved in formaldehyde in a bottle together with samples of different genera (see also Kuyper 1985). The consistency of the fruiting bodies is soft and jelly-like and the lectotype is not in a good condition, so, e.g., the caulocystidia cannot be examined. There is no chance that caulocystidia will be observable on any other material in the bottle. Therefore, and because no drawing or detailed description nor a photograph are given in the original description, and because I. albomarginata is often mistaken for I. amblyospora, we decided to select an epitype for I. albomarginata.

  • What is termed above as “syntype” of I. reducta is the only type material with details matching the holotype we are aware of, but as LANGE did not specify where the type was deposited and not all of his material is in C, we cannot be sure it is the only instance of the material. Inocybe reducta was already synonymized with I. albomarginata by Kuyper (1985, 1986). Our morphological study of the type material in C supports this. Both have the same on average very small and especially very narrow spores, which excludes a synonymy with either I. amblyospora (see below) or I. pseudoreducta [with wider, often (sub)ovoid, apple-seed-like spores], and the shape of the hymenial cystidia is very similar; molecular data are not available from the type of I. reducta, because it was preserved in formaldehyde for some time.

  • Macroscopically, the pileus of I. albomarginata is mostly of reddish brown to red-brown colour, with a darker to almost blackish brown centre, its surface is at most finely innately fibrillose to rimulose, the lamellae are flat, and the species is furthermore characterized by an entirely but in the lower half sometimes sparsely pruinose stipe with a thickened to bulbous base and, on average, rather short subfusiform to (sub)utriform hymenial cystidia with a wide neck. A velipellis is lacking. Inocybe amblyospora, with which I. albomarginata has been mistaken [among others by Bandini et al. (2019b; MH366616) and Ryberg et al. (2008; AM882908.2), differs, e.g., by the presence of a velipellis, smoother pileus centre, on average longer spores and a different ecology. It occurs in montane to subalpine regions, often in somewhat moist terrain. Inocybe suecica Vauras & E. Larss., another species with small spores, can be distinguished from I. albomarginata, e.g., by the presence of a velipellis, smoother pileus surface and glabrous centre of pileus, as well as larger spores (Vauras & Larsson 2016; DB, personal observation), and I. pseudoreducta, e.g., by the presence of a velipellis, smoother centre of pileus, and wider spores often shaped like apple seeds (Stangl & Glowinski 1981; La Rosa et al. 2017). Inocybe bonii (see below) differs from I. albomarginata, e.g., by the greyish velipellis, smoother pileus surface at the centre, not flat lamellae and larger spores. Inocybe demetris Bandini & U. Eberh. differs, e.g., by the abundant velipellis, paler pileus colour, smooth centre of pileus, on average larger spores and much longer caulocystidia, as well as growth with conifers (Bandini et al. 2022b). Inocybe metrodii Stangl & J. Veselský can be distinguished from I. albomarginata, e.g., by the often larger basidiomata, presence of a velipellis, smoother centre of pileus, lamellae and stipe often partly becoming yellowish when bruised, and on average larger spores (Stangl & Veselský 1979; Bandini et al. 2021c), and I. glabrescens Velen., e.g., by the generally less stout basidiomata, abundant velipellis, pileus colour without reddish tinge, and larger spores (Velenovský, 1920-1922; Bandini et al. 2021c). Apart from I. amblyospora and I. pseudoreducta, none of the named species is particularly closely related to I. albomarginata (Fig. 1).

  • Two undescribed taxa are most similar to I. albomarginata in their ITS (SH1144361.09FU, in Fig. 1 represented by KR673688 and LC623536; and SH1144362.09FU, in Fig. 1 represented by KF041394). The two Asian sequences form the sister clade to I. albomarginata, which is phylogenetically well supported (98/100/1) in Fig. 1. The described species most similar in the ITS, but with less than 90% similarity rather distant, are I. flavoalbida Matheny & Bougher and I. praecox Kropp, Matheny & Nanagy. Inocybe flavoalbida is a small-spored species with entirely pruinose stipe. It differs from I. albomarginata, e.g., by the paler pileus colour and habitat, since it was found in mixed subtropical rainforest in Australia and Papua New Guinea (Matheny & Bougher 2017). Neither the ITS of the holotype nor that of the paratypes of I. praecox has been published, but the sequences indicated in Fig. 1 as I. praecox are identical in their LSU to the holotype of I. praecox. Inocybe praecox can be distinguished by larger and stouter basidiomata, a partially appressed squamulose pileus surface and clavate to fusiform-ventricose hymenial cystidia. It is a vernal species and was described from western Washington state (USA); the sequences used here for the species stem from across the border, from British Columbia (Canada).

  • Fig. 4.

    Inocybe bonii. a. Holotype, scale bar: 1 cm. b. Coll. DB20-11-19-Valade (photo F. VALADE), scale bar: 1 cm. c. Cheilocystidium (holotype), scale bar: 10 µm. d. Microscopic characters (holotype); Ca = Caulocystidia, Cpa = Cauloparacystidia, Ch = Cheilocystidia, Pa = Paracystidia, Pl = Pleurocystidia, Sp = Spores; scale bar spores: 10 µm, scale bar cystidia: 50 µm. e. Spores (holotype), scale bar: 10 µm.

    img-z10-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Inocybe carolina. a. Holotype (photo: F.J. Rodríguez-Campo), scale bar: 1 cm. b. Coll. MA-Fungi 98711 (photo: F.J. Rodríguez-Campo), scale bar: 1 cm. c. Cheilocystidium (DB9-10-21-7), scale bar: 10 µm. d. Microscopic characters (holotype); Ca = Caulocystidia, Cpa = Cauloparacystidia, Ch = Cheilocystidia, Pa = Paracystidia, Pl = Pleurocystidia, Sp = Spores; scale bar spores: 10 µm, scale bar cystidia: 50 µm. e. Spores (DB9-10-21-7), scale bar: 10 µm.

    img-z12-1_01.jpg

    Inocybe amblyospora Kühner, Bull. Soc. Naturalistes Oyonnax 9 (suppl.): 3 (1955) (Figs. 3, 8b)

  • Description and iconography: Kühner (1955).

  • Typification

  • Lectotype designated by Poirier (2016: 54): FRANCE, Savoie, above Avenches, “Pierre Larron” [alt. 1770 m], moist location with Picea abies, under Adenostyles, 18 Aug. 1937 [leg. R. Kühner] (G00058748).

  • Description

  • Pileus 20–40 mm wide, at first (sub)conical to subcampanulate, later conico-convex, convex or expanded, with or without a more or less pronounced large umbo, margin at first involute or decurved, later decurved to straight or even uplifted and then pileus depressed around the centre; when young, with faint remnants of a greyish velipellis, visible sometimes also later at the centre of the pileus; colour dark brown with reddish hue to dark reddish brown (Mu 5YR 4/3–4/6, 3/3–3/4; 7.5YR 3/4), sometimes up to blackish brown at the centre; surface at first smooth and shiny glabrous, later still shiny and smooth or slightly verrucose at the centre, outwards minutely appressed floccose or rim(ul)ose to minutely innately fibrillose; young basidiomata with remnants of a cortina. Lamellae from moderately crowded to subdistant (c. 40–50, l = 1–3), broadly adnate, subventricose, at first whitish to whitish-greyish, later pale yellowish to pale ochraceous-brownish; edge strongly fimbriate, whitish. Stipe 30–60 × 3–7 mm, rather stout, cylindrical or widening towards the base, base thickened to (sub)bulbous, at first entirely covered by fine whitish tomentum, later longitudinally striate to glabrous, at first very pale brownish, then brownish to intensely red-brown, near the base and at the extreme apex remaining whitish and thus sometimes with strong colour contrast; rather roughly pruinose over its entire length. Context whitish in pileus and stipe, brownish in the cortex of the stipe when old. Smell indistinct. Colour of exsiccata. Pileus brown to dark brown with reddish hue (Mu YR 7/5YR 4/4–4/6, 3/4), lamellae a little lighter in colour, stipe concolorous or a little darker in colour, no darkening or blackening on drying.

  • Spores 7.2–10.0 µm (av. 8.4 µm, SD 0.4 µm) × 3.9–5.0 µm (av. 4.4 µm, SD 0.2 µm); Q = 1.6–2.3 (av. 1.9, SD 0.1) (n = 120 of 3 coll.), smooth, mostly narrow (sub)ellipsoid or subcylindrical, with or without a suprahilar depression, apex obtuse, rarely subobtuse. Basidia 25–30 × 7–9 µm, generally 4-spored, rarely also 2-spored and then spores up to 10 µm. Pleurocystidia 39–74 µm (av. 58 µm, SD 8 µm) × 12–23 µm (av. 17 µm, SD 3 µm), Q = 1.7–5.6, av. 3.6, SD 0.9) (n = 45 of 3 coll.), mostly (sub)utriform, also (sub)fusiform or subcylindrical, with sometimes a rather long neck, usually with a short, but sometimes with a long pedicel, apex usually with only small crystals, walls up to 1.0 (1.5) µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size, intermixed with numerous colourless (sub)clavate, (sub)cylindrical or subglobose, thin-walled paracystidia. Pileipellis constituted of an epicutis made up of parallel hyphae 5–12 µm wide, with encrusting and parietal brownish to brown pigment, subcutis with wider and paler to colourless elements, intermixed with thin-walled colourless cauloparacystidia. Caulocystidia on the entire length of the stipe, 35–60 × 10–15 (20) µm, broadly (sub)fusiform, (sub)utriform, rarely (sub)clavate, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 1.0 µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH, intermixed with colourless (sub)clavate, thin-walled cauloparacystidia. Clamp connections abundant in all tissues.

  • Habitat and distribution

  • Inocybe amblyospora was found by us with Picea abies at high montane to subalpine altitudes, often in rather moist conditions. One collection was found on a small island in the middle of a brook, another on a moist slope crisscrossed by springlets. This fits very well to what Kühner wrote about the location of the holotype (see below). Besides our own collections from Austria and Germany, no other sequences of basidiomata or EcM or soil-samples are known to us. Thus, the species seems to be rather rare.

  • Type specimens examined

  • Lectotype (G00058748). Spores 7.3–10.0 µm (av. 8.8 µm, SD 0.7 µm) × 3.6–4.8 µm (av. 4.4 µm, SD 0.3 µm); Q = 1.7–2.4 (av. 2.0, SD 0.2) (n = 40), smooth, oblong, mostly (sub)cylindrical, apex obtuse. Basidia 4-spored. Pleurocystidia 52–75 µm (av. 62 µm, SD 8.0 µm) × 8–19 µm (av. 14 µm, SD 3.1 µm); Q = 3.1–6.5 (av. 4.7, SD 1.0) (n = 15), (sub)cylindrical, (sub)fusiform or subutriform, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 1.0 (1.5) µm thick, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size. Paracystidia not observed. Caulocystidia not studied (stipe was not sent by the herbarium).

  • Additional specimens examined

  • AUSTRIA, Tirol, Imst, Silz, Kühtai, ÖK25V 2221-Ost, alt. 1780 m, Picea abies, 20 Aug. 2012, leg. D. Bandini & B. Oertel (DB20-8-12-12). Salzburg, Tamsweg, Prebersee, ÖK25V 3230-Ost, alt. 1500 m, moist location with Picea abies, Alnus sp., 10 Aug. 2013, leg. D. Bandini (SMNS-STU-F-0901742, DB10-8-13-11). Salzburg, Zederhaus, Riedingtal, ÖK25V 3229-Ost, alt. 1490 m, moist location with Picea abies, 18 Sep. 2020, leg. D. Bandini (DB18-9-20-25). GERMANY, Bayern, Ostallgäu, Pfronten, Breitenberg, TK25 8429/3, alt. c. 1800 m, very moist location with Alnus viridis, Picea abies, 19 Aug. 2012, leg. D. Bandini & B. Oertel (DB19-8-12-15). Bayern, Ostallgäu, Halblech, Ammergebirge, TK25 8431/1/3, alt. 1400 m, Picea abies, 17 Sep. 2018, leg. D. Bandini (SMNS-STU-F-0901741, DB17-9-18-9).

  • Notes

  • Inocybe amblyospora is characterized by a dark brown to dark reddish brown pileus colour, smooth to rim(ul)ose or minutely fibrillose pileus surface, faint greyish velipellis, stipe pruinose over entire length, smooth, on average short and narrow spores, mostly (sub)utriform hymenial cystidia often with a rather long neck, and broadly (sub)fusiform or (sub)utriform caulocystidia. It can be found at montane to subalpine altitudes with conifers. The species has been mistaken for I. albomarginata (see under I. albomarginata), which differs from I. amblyospora, e.g., by lacking a velipellis, by the often areolate-diffracted or somewhat cracked pileus centre, flat lamellae and shorter spores, as well as a habitat usually at lower altitudes (see above). Inocybe bonii has, e.g., on average shorter but wider spores, on average smaller hymenial cystidia and longer, mostly narrow utriform or subcylindrical caulocystidia with mostly a long and undate neck. The spores and hymenial cystidia of I. suecica are on average wider, and the species grows with frondose trees (Vauras & Larsson 2016; DB, personal observation). Inocybe brijunica Mešić, Tkalčec & Haelew. can be distinguished from I. amblyospora, e.g., by stipe pruinose only near the apex or at least not in the lower half, much shorter spores and shorter hymenial cystidia, as well as a Mediterranean habitat (Mešić et al. 2021), and I. demetris, e.g., by the abundant velipellis, on average wider spores, hymenial cystidia often with undate walls, and much longer caulocystidia (Bandini et al. 2022b). Inocybe pseudoreducta differs, e.g., by pileus surface more decidedly rimose with age, spores often shaped like apple-seeds with (sub)conical apex, as well as habitat usually at lower altitudes (Stangl & Glowinski 1981; La Rosa et al. 2017).

  • The two available sequences for I. amblyospora received high ufb and pp support (100and 1, respectively) in Fig. 1. The species is clearly distinct from all other described or unnamed taxa. Inocybe amblyospora is, with around 90% similarity in the ITS, only very distantly related to I. praecox, which has larger basidiomata than I. amblyospora, a paler pileus colour, on average wider spores, clavate to ventricose fusiform hymenial cystidia, and occurs in spring (Kropp et al. 2010 and see above under I. albomarginata). We were not allowed to sequence the lectotype of I. amblyospora, but since the macroscopic and microscopic details of our own collections match well with those of the type, and since the habitat is the same, we are confident that the collections we sequenced are I. amblyospora and consider our sequences suitable as surrogates for a type sequence, at least until data from the type become available.

  • Fig. 6.

    Inocybe centesima. a. Holotype, scale bar: 1 cm. b. Coll. DB31-10-21-1, scale bar: 1 cm. c. Cheilocystidia (DB25-10-17-2), scale bar: 10 µm. d. Microscopic characters (holotype); Ca = Caulocystidia, Cpa = Cauloparacystidia, Ch = Cheilocystidia, Pa = Paracystidia, Pl = Pleurocystidia, Sp = Spores; scale bar spores: 10 µm, scale bar cystidia: 50 µm. e. Spores (holotype), scale bar: 10 µm.

    img-z14-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 7.

    Inocybe rufuloides. a. Epitype, scale bar: 1 cm. b. Coll. DB31-10-21-4, scale bar: 1 cm. c. Cheilocystidia and Paracystidia (epitype), scale bar: 10 µm. d. Microscopic characters (epitype); Ca = Caulocystidia, Cpa = Cauloparacystidia, Ch = Cheilocystidia, Pa = Paracystidia, Pl = Pleurocystidia, Sp = Spores; scale bar spores: 10 µm, scale bar cystidia: 50 µm. e. Spores (epitype), scale bar: 10 µm.

    img-z16-1_01.jpg

    Inocybe bonii Bandini, Valade & U. Eberh., sp. n. (Fig. 4; MycoBank: MB 849355)

  • Etymology

  • Named “bonii” in honour of Marcel Bon, who was an outstanding inocybologist.

  • Diagnosis

  • Inocybe bonii has a brown pileus colour, mostly with reddish hue, at most rimose pileus surface, entirely pruinose stipe, smooth spores, size on average 8.3 × 5.0 µm, mostly (sub)fusiform hymenial cystidia, pleurocystidia measuring on average 52 × 13 µm, and narrow utriform or subcylindrical caulocystidia with mostly a long and undate neck. It grows on calcareous soil. It can be recognized by the combination of the above characteristics and differs in its ITS sequence from other species, such as I. albomarginata or I. pseudoreducta.

  • Holotype

  • GERMANY, Baden-Württemberg, Alb-Donau-Kreis, Merklingen, Widderstall, TK25 7424/3, alt. 850 m, Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica, 30 Sep. 2021, leg. D. Bandini (STU SMNS-STU-F-0901743; isotype priv. herb. D.B. DB30-9-21-3).

  • Description

  • Pileus 10–30 mm wide, at first (sub)conical to subcampanulate, later broadly convex or expanded, often without, otherwise with a more or less pronounced large umbo, margin at first decurved, later straight to even uplifted and then depressed around the centre; young basidiomata with remnants of a pale greyish velipellis visible even later at the centre but vanishing when moist; colour brown in different shades, mostly with reddish hue (Mu 10YR 5/4–5/6, 4/4–4/6; 7.5YR 4/4–4/6; 5YR 4/4–4/6), with age sometimes strongly paling, either towards the margin or entirely; surface at first smooth and glabrous, with age either remaining glabrous or getting from minutely rimulose to strongly rimose towards the margin, with diverging fibres so that the paler context below is visible; no remnants of a cortina observed. Lamellae moderately crowded (c. 35–60, l = 1–3), adnate, sometimes with subdecurrent tooth, subventricose, long time whitish, later greyish-whitish and with age greyish-brownish with a more or less intense ochraceous hue; edge often irregular, even, whitish. Stipe 30–70 × 2–5 mm, straight or curved, base even to thickened or even submarginate bulbous, when young entirely covered with thin whitish tomentum, later longitudinally striate to glabrous, at first whitish, then flesh-coloured to pale reddish or even rather intense reddish-brownish, base/bulb whitish; pruinose on entire length, though sparsely in the lower half. Context whitish in the pileus, faintly brownish or reddish-brownish in the cortex of the stipe, whitish in the base/bulb. Smell (sub)spermatic, at least when cut. Colour of exsiccata. Pileus brown to dark reddish brown (Mu 5YR 4/3–4/6, 3/2–3/4; 7.5YR 4/4–4/6), lamellae and stipe concolorous, no darkening or blackening on drying.

  • Spores 7.3–9.2 µm (av. 8.3 µm, SD 0.4 µm) × 4.5–5.6 µm (av. 5.0 µm, SD 0.2 µm); Q = 1.4–2.0 (av. 1.6, SD 0.1) (n = 120 of 3 coll.), smooth, (sub)amygdaloid, mostly without a suprahilar depression, apex (sub)acute, with indistinct pseudoporus. Basidia 21–28 × 7–10 µm, generally 4-spored, rarely also 2-spored and then spores up to 10.5 µm. Pleurocystidia 41–65 µm (av. 52 µm, SD 6 µm) × 9–18 µm (av. 13 µm, SD 2 µm); Q = 2.8–6.7 (av. 4.2, SD 0.9) (n = 45 of 3 coll.), mostly (sub)fusiform, sometimes also (sub)utriform or sublageniform, usually without or with only short neck but occasionally also with a longer neck, walls sometimes somewhat undate, mostly with a rather short pedicel, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 2.5 (3.0) µm thick at the apex, yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size, intermixed with numerous colourless, (sub)clavate, thin-walled paracystidia. Pileipellis constituted of an epicutis made up of parallel hyphae 4–11 µm wide, with encrusting and parietal brown to dark brown pigment, subcutis with wider and paler to colourless elements, up to 15 µm wide. Caulocystidia on entire length of the stipe, but only sparsely in the lower half, 50–95 × 8–13 µm, narrow utriform or subcylindrical, mostly with a long neck with undate walls, with a short pedicel or sometimes with truncate base, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 1.5 µm thick at the apex, yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH, intermixed with (sub)clavate to (sub)cylindrical, thin-walled cauloparacystidia. Clamp-connections abundant in all tissues.

  • Habitat and distribution

  • Inocybe bonii was found by us on calcareous soil with conifers or frondose trees, in France and Germany. In GenBank and UNITE (SH0570962.09FU, 2.0% = SH0017908.09FU, 3%) there are no other sequences from basidiomata, but EcM sequences from Germany (HF675192), Switzerland (MN970792), and soil-samples from Estonia, Greece, Iran, Israel, Italy and Morocco that might also represent I. bonii.

  • Additional specimens examined

  • FRANCE, Charente-Maritime, Lozay, bois d'Essouverts, 46.028158 N, -0.537226 W, alt. 88 m, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Picea abies, 20 Nov. 2019, leg. F. VALADE (DB20-11-19-Valade, FV2019112002). GERMANY, Sachsen-Anhalt, Börde, Weferlingen, TK25 3632/3, Quercus robur, Carpinus betulus, 14 Oct. 2013, leg. E. Preikschas (SMNS-STU-F-0901747, DB14-10-13-Preikschas). Bayern, Ostallgäu, Füssen, cemetery, TK25 8430/1, alt. 800 m, Picea abies, 22 Sep. 2021, leg. D. Bandini (SMNS-STU-F-0901744, DB22-9-21-8). Baden-Württemberg, Alb-Donau-Kreis, Merklingen, Widderstall, TK25 7424/3, alt. 850 m, Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica, 30 Sep. 2021, leg. D. Bandini (SMNS-STU-F-0901745, DB30-9-21-5).

  • Notes

  • Inocybe bonii is characterized by an often reddish-hued brown, smooth to rimose pileus surface, pale greyish velipellis, when aging an up to intensely reddish-brownish stipe pruinose on its entire length but only sparsely so in the lower half, on average rather small smooth spores and mostly (sub)fusiform hymenial cystidia as well as narrow utriform or subcylindrical caulocystidia with a mostly long and undate neck. The species can be mistaken for several other species with small spores such as I. albomarginata, which differs, e.g., by lacking a velipellis, by the often areolate-diffracted or somewhat cracked pileus centre, flat, long time whitish lamellae and smaller spores (see above). Inocybe amblyospora differs, e.g., by the usually darker pileus colour, when aging less rimose pileus surface, the reduced and very fugacious velipellis, and narrower, oblong, often (sub)cylindrical spores with (sub)obtuse apex as well as habitat usually in higher montane areas (see above), and I. brijunica, e.g., by the usually darker brown pileus colour without reddish tinges, smaller spores and Mediterranean habitat (Mešić et al. 2021). Inocybe comis Bandini & B. Oertel has a finely tomentose to minutely or strongly lanose pileus, stipe pruinose only near the apex, spores mostly with an explicit suprahilar depression and caulocystidia often with subcapitate apex (Bandini et al. 2022b), whereas I. demetris usually has fewer reddish tinges and never reddish pilei, mostly (sub)utriform to (sub)lageniform hymenial cystidia sometimes with undate neck, on average longer spores and longer hymenial cystidia (Bandini et al. 2022b). Inocybe glabripes Ricken differs from I. bonii by usually lacking reddish tinges in the pileus colour, at most a finely rimose pileus surface, stipe pruinose only near the apex, smaller spores and shorter hymenial cystidia (see, e.g., Ricken 1910–1915; Lange 1917, as “I. microspora”; Kuyper 1986; Stangl 1989; Bandini et al. 2021c), I. minimispora, e.g., by the only faint reddish hue in the pileus colour, fugacious whitish velipellis, stipe pruinose only near the apex, smaller spores and shorter caulocystidia (Reumaux 1986; Bandini et al. 2021c), and I. heterosemen, e.g., by the at the centre reddish and towards the margin yellow-ochraceous pileus colour, on average smaller spores and shorter, often (sub)clavate hymenial cystidia (Carteret & Reumaux 2012; Bandini et al. 2022b). Inocybe pseudoreducta has on average shorter, mostly ovoid or apple-seed shaped spores and plumper, on average wider hymenial cystidia and mostly (sub)fusiform, often somewhat deformed caulocystidia not with an undate neck, whereas I. suecica never has an almost reddish pileus colour, pileus often much darker at the centre than towards the margin, stipe not becoming intensely reddish-brownish with age but paler, and hymenial cystidia often with a clearly demarcated transition from the bulge to the neck, and usually growing on more rich and less dry terrain (Vauras & Larsson 2016; DB, personal observation). The pileus of I. virgatula Kühner has at most a faint reddish hue, the stipe is pruinose only near the apex, has larger spores with a suprahilar depression and on average larger hymenial cystidia (Kühner 1955; Stangl 1974; Bandini et al. 2021c).

  • Based on available data, it is not clear whether soil sequences included in the same sh as sequences that quite clearly represent I. bonii all represent the species or whether I. bonii has a very close unnamed sister taxon. The distribution data could suggest that I. bonii s. str. has a temperate distribution and some of the sequenced soil samples a more Mediterranean one, but this is based on a very small number of samples and could be misleading. We here decided to treat I. bonii in the narrower sense. Phylogenetically, based on ITS and LSU, the closest relative is I. demetris (see Fig. 1); in terms of ITS similarity, I. comis and I. glabripes rank almost the same as I. demetris (all around 93%).

  • Fig. 8.

    Microscopic characters of type collections. a. Inocybe albomarginata (PRC-bottle n°119). b. I. amblyospora (G00058748). c. I. reducta (C-F-67157). Ca = Caulocystidia, Cpa = Cauloparacystidia, Ch = Cheilocystidia, Pa = Paracystidia, Pl = Pleurocystidia, Sp = Spores; scale bar spores: 10 µm, scale bar cystidia: 50 µm.

    img-z18-1_01.jpg

    Inocybe carolina Bandini, Rodr.-Campo & U. Eberh., sp. n.
    (Fig. 5; MycoBank: MB 849356)

  • Etymology

  • Named “carolina” (“belonging to Carolus”, i.e., Carl) after Carl von Linné.

  • Diagnosis

  • Inocybe carolina has a brown to dark brown pileus colour, long time smooth and glabrous, with age only minutely innately fibrillose pileus surface, abundant whitish velipellis, stipe pruinose only near the apex, smooth spores measuring on average 9.2 × 5.6 µm, a usually rather plump and rather thin-walled, variously shaped hymenial cystidia, and pleurocystidia measuring on average 68 × 14 µm. It grows on dry calcareous soil and is probably associated with Pinus. It can be recognized by the combination of the above characteristics and differs in its ITS sequence from other species, such as I. venerabilis or I. rufobrunnea.

  • Holotype

  • SPAIN, Comunidad de Madrid, Guadalix de la Sierra, 40.774700 /-3.640960, alt. 827 m, in an abandoned limestone quarry, at mossy location close to Pinus sylvestris, Populus nigra and Juniperus oxycedrus, 26 Nov. 2018, leg. A. Díaz-Fernández, J.A. Rodea-Butragueño, M. García-Aranda & F.J. Rodríguez-Campo (holotype MA-Fungi 98710; isotypes priv. herb. F.J. RodrÍguez Campo PRC-181126-05, STU SMNS-STU-F-0901789, priv. herb. D.B. DB26-11-18-Rodr.-Campo).

  • Description

  • Pileus 5–35 mm wide, at first subconical to subcampanulate or subglobose, later broadly convex or expanded, usually without an umbo, margin at first decurved, later straight or even uplifted when old, and then pileus depressed around the umbo; young basidiomata thickly covered by a layer of whitish velipellis, visible also later at least at the centre of the pileus; colour brownish to dark brown (Mu 10YR 4/3–4/6, 3/4–3/6; 7.5 YR 3/4), but mostly somewhat speckled because of remnants of the velipellis; surface at first and often long time smooth and glabrous, later sometimes minutely innately fibrillose with fine fibres; young basidiomata with faint remnants of a whitish cortina. Lamellae moderately crowded (c. 35–50, l = 1–3), broadly adnate with a (sub)decurrent tooth, even to (sub)ventricose, at first whitish, later creamy to greyish-whitish, with age greyish-brownish; edge strongly fimbriate, whitish. Stipe 20–40 × 2–7 mm, often rather stout, straight to curved, sometimes widening towards the base or base widened or even bulbous, when young covered with whitish tomentum, later longitudinally striate to glabrous, at first pale flesh-coloured, later ochraceous brownish, with or without reddish tinge, and pale to sometimes rather intensely reddish near the apex; roughly pruinose only near the apex of the stipe. Context watery whitish in the pileus and at first also in the stipe, later greyish-whitish to reddish brown, at least in the cortex of the upper half of the stipe. Smell indistinct or subspermatic to slightly disagreeable. Colour of exsiccata. Pileus dark brown (Mu 7/5YR 3–4; 10YR 3/3–3/6), lamellae and stipe concolorous or a little lighter in colour, no darkening or blackening on drying.

  • Spores 8.0–10.6 µm (av. 9.2 µm, SD 0.6 µm) × 4.8–6.8 µm (av. 5.6 µm, SD 0.4 µm); Q = 1.4–2.0 (av. 1.7, SD 0.1) (n = 160 of 4 coll.), smooth, often rather heterogeneous in size, mostly broadly (sub)amygdaloid, usually without and only rarely with a faint suprahilar depression, apex mostly (sub)acute. Basidia 24–42 × 8–13 µm, generally 4-spored, rarely also 2-spored. Pleurocystidia 45–91 µm (av. 68 µm, SD 8 µm) × 10–19 µm (av. 14 µm, SD 2 µm); Q = 3.1–7.2 (av. 4.9, SD 1.0) (n = 60 of 4 coll.), rather plump (sub)utriform, (sub)cylindrical, subfusiform or (sub)clavate, without or with only a short neck, often with more or less undate walls, sometimes with a rounded and occasionally cap-like thickened apex, with a short pedicel or with truncate base, apex crystalliferous or not, walls up to 1.0 (1.5) µm thick at the apex, but mostly rather thin-walled, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in size but somewhat more variable in shape, intermixed with numerous colourless, (sub)clavate, thin-walled, sometimes catenate paracystidia. Pileipellis constituted of an epicutis made up of parallel hyphae 4–12 µm wide, with encrusting and parietal dark brown pigment, subcutis with wider and paler to colourless elements. Caulocystidia only near the apex of the stipe, 35–70 × 10–15 µm, often rather plump (sub)fusiform, (sub)cylindrical to (sub)clavate, apex with or without small crystals, walls up to 1.0 µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH; intermixed with some colourless, (sub)clavate, thin-walled cauloparacystidia. Clamp-connections abundant in all tissues.

  • Habitat and distribution

  • Inocybe carolina was found by us in Austria and Spain, always on dry calcareous soil. In Austria it was found on the gravelly border of a small road, not far from the river Lech, in the vicinity of Helianthemum, Dryas and various species of gentians and orchids. The collections from Spain were found in an abandoned limestone quarry. This calcareous area is a small hill located next to the Pedrezuela reservoir, with Quercus ilex as the predominant tree species and various other species at the foot of the quarry: Populus nigra, Juniperus oxycedrus and Pinus sylvestris. Species hypothesis SH1235752.09FU, 1.5% presumably represents I. carolina, with a specimen sequence from Italy (JF908222) and soil sample sequences from Morocco. Probably not all sequences in the corresponding species hypothesis at 3% (SH0200216.09FU) represent I. carolina.

  • Additional specimens examined

  • AUSTRIA, Tirol, Reutte, Rieden, ÖK25V 2215-West, alt. 790 m, Pinus sylvestris, Juniperus sp., 8 Sep. 2019, leg. D. Bandini (DB8-9-19-22). Tirol, Reutte, Weißenbach am Lech, at the wayside, ÖK25V 2215-West, alt. 870 m, Pinus sylvestris, 9 Oct. 2021, leg. D. Bandini (DB9-10-21-7). SPAIN, Comunidad de Madrid, Guadalix de la Sierra, 40.77769 /-3.64081, alt. 830 m, in an abandoned limestone quarry, mossy location near Pinus sylvestris, Populus nigra and Juniperus oxycedrus, 16 Nov. 2015, leg. J. A. Rodea-Butragueño & A. Díaz-Fernández (MA-Fungi 98709, priv. herb. PRC-151116-02, SMNS-STU-F-0901790, DB16-11-15-Rodr.-Campo). Ibidem, 23 Oct. 2020, leg. J.A. Rodea-Butragueño & F. J. Rodríguez-Campo (MA-Fungi 98711, priv. herb. PRC-201023-01, DB23-10-20-Rodr.Campo). Ibidem, 27 Oct. 2021, leg. J.A. Rodea-Butragueño, A. Díaz-Fernández & F.J. Rodríguez-Campo (MA-Fungi 98712, priv. herb. PRC-211027-01, DB27-10-21-Rodr.-Campo).

  • Notes

  • Inocybe carolina is characterized by the brown to dark brown pileus colour, long time smooth and glabrous, with age only minutely innately fibrillose pileus surface, abundant whitish velipellis, stipe pruinose only near the apex, smooth broadly (sub)amygdaloid spores and usually rather plump and rather thin-walled, differently-shaped hymenial cystidia, as well as rather plump (sub)fusiform to (sub)clavate caulocystidia. The habitat was for all our collections dry calcareous soil with Pinus nearby. In Austria, I. venerabilis Bandini, B. Oertel & U. Eberh. was found in the same habitat. This species differs from I. carolina, e.g., by the smaller basidiomata, greyish velipellis, larger spores and often shorter hymenial cystidia (Bandini et al. 2022b). Inocybe aurantiobrunnea Esteve-Rav. & García Blanco, a species described from Spain, differs, e.g., by the less abundant velipellis, orange to orange-yellow lamellae and larger spores (Esteve-Raventós et al. 2003; Bandini et al. 2022a), while I. costinitii Bizio, Ferisin & Dovana, also a Mediterranean species, has larger spores, often subcylindrical thicker-walled hymenial cystidia and usually long and narrow (sub)cylindrical to (sub)fusiform caulocystidia (Bizio et al. 2016; Bandini et al. 2021c). Inocybe rufobrunnea J. Favre can be distinguished from I. carolina, e.g., by the more fragile basidiomata, less smooth pileus surface, greyish velipellis and much larger spores (Favre 1955; Kuyper 1986, as “I. rufuloides var. exilis”; Bandini et al. 2022b), I. tarda Kühner, e.g., by the sometimes almost blackish brown pileus colour, less abundant and darker velipellis, larger spores and longer, often somewhat deformed caulocystidia often with undate walls (Kühner 1955; Bandini et al. 2021c, 2022a), I. filiana, e.g., by the usually smaller and more fragile basidiomata, with age often less smooth pileus surface, less abundant velipellis and shorter and not plump hymenial cystidia (Bandini et al. 2022b). Furthermore, it can be found on more acidic soil. Inocybe aerea E. Ludw. has more fragile basidiomata, a less smooth pileus surface, fugacious and less abundant greyish velipellis and narrower spores, and it grows near Salix (Ludwig 2017; DB, personal observation), whereas, I. furfurea Kühner differs from I. carolina, e.g., by the usually paler pileus colour, with age scabby, cracked and/or fissured pileus centre, fugacious and less abundant greyish velipellis and on average much shorter spores (e.g., Kühner 1955; Kuyper 1986; Stangl 1989; Bandini et al. 2019c). Inocybe griseovelata Kühner usually has a paler pileus colour, more greyish velipellis, longer spores and very long and narrow caulocystidia (Kühner 1955; Kuyper 1986; Stangl 1989; Bandini et al. 2021c, 2022a), and I. grusiana Bandini & B. Oertel can be distinguished from I. carolina, e.g., by the greyish velipellis, longer spores and long and narrow, subcylindrical caulocystidia (Bandini et al. 2021c).

  • Inocybe aurantiobrunnea is the most similar described species to I. carolina, with a 94% sequence identity in the ITS. As for I. bonii, without morphology it is difficult to delimit I. carolina clearly against EcM and soil data, although in this case the support for I. carolina s. str. is, with 89/100/1, better than for the clades including soil or EcM sequences. In Fig. 1, I. carolina is interpreted in the strict sense.

  • Inocybe centesima Bandini, G. Bandini & U. Eberh., sp. n.
    (Fig. 6; MycoBank: MB 849357)

  • Etymology

  • Named “centesima” because it is the hundredth new species described by D. Bandini and co-authors.

  • Diagnosis

  • Inocybe centesima has an at the centre pale brownish, outwards dark brown pileus colour with a purple hue, smooth to at most rim(ul)ose pileus surface, entirely pruinose stipe, smooth, mostly almost kidney-shaped spores measuring on average 11.6 × 6.0 µm, mostly (sub)fusiform hymenial cystidia, pleurocystidia measuring on average 55 × 19 µm, and growing on sandy calcareous soil with Pinus sylvestris. It can be recognized by the above combination of characteristics and differs in its ITS sequence from other species, such as I. psammobrunnea or I. rufobrunnea, that can be found in the same habitat.

  • Holotype

  • GERMANY, Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Sandhausen, near Nature Reserve Düne Pferdstrieb, TK25 6617/4, alt. 113 m, Pinus sylvestris, 25 Oct. 2017, leg. D. Bandini (STU SMNS-STU-F-0901749; isotype priv. herb. D.B. DB25-10-17-2).

  • Description

  • Pileus 20–35 mm wide, at first (sub)conical, later broadly convex or expanded, with or without low, large umbo, margin slightly decurved, later straight or even uplifted, and then pileus depressed around the umbo; young basidiomata with faint and fugacious remnants of a pale greyish velipellis; usually somewhat bicoloured, pale ochraceous brownish to pale nut-brown at the centre and sometimes with age also at the margin, outside the centre brown with a more or less intense purplish hue (Mu 10YR 5/6–5/8; 5YR 5/6–5/8; 10R 3/4–3/6); surface at first smooth and glabrous, later finely rim(ul)ose towards the margin; no remnants of a cortina observed. Lamellae moderately crowded (c. 40–60, l = 1–3), irregular, adnate, (sub)ventricose, at first whitish then dingy whitish with greyish hue or greyish to greyish-brownish; edge fimbriate, whitish. Stipe 40–60 × 3–5 mm, cylindrical or widening towards the base, base always thickly covered with sand, equal or slightly thickened; at first covered with fine whitish tomentum, later longitudinally striate or glabrous, at first whitish, later dingy whitish to ivory or beige; pruinose on entire length. Context dingy or watery whitish in the pileus, whitish in the stipe. Smell spermatic, at least when cut. Colour of exsiccata. Pileus dark brown with reddish hue (Mu 5YR 3/3–3/4; 7.5YR 3/4), lamellae a little lighter and stipe much paler in colour, no darkening or blackening on drying.

  • Spores 10.0–13.6 µm (av. 11.6 µm, SD 0.8 µm) × 5.3–7.1 µm (av. 6.0 µm, SD 0.3 µm); Q = 1.7–2.3 (av. 1.9, SD 0.1) (n = 120 of 3 coll.), smooth, mostly very characteristically almost kidney-shaped, with a suprahilar depression, apex subacute to subobtuse, with small indistinct pseudoporus. Basidia 25–30 × 7–11 µm, generally 4-spored, but also 2-spored. Pleurocystidia 37–73 µm (av. 55 µm, SD 8 µm) × 14–24 µm (av. 19 µm, SD 2 µm); Q = 1.9–4.9 (av. 2.9, SD 0.6) (n = 45 of 3 coll.), usually ventricose (sub)fusiform, at the apex generally wide, without or with only a short neck, usually without or with a short pedicel, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 1.5 (2.0) µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size, intermixed with numerous colourless, (sub)clavate or subcylindrical, thin-walled paracystidia. Pileipellis constituted of an epicutis made up of parallel hyphae 4–12 µm wide, with encrusting and parietal brownish to dark brown pigment, subcutis with wider and paler to colourless elements. Caulocystidia on the entire length of the stipe, but only sparsely in the lower half due to abrasion through sand particles, 30–55 × 10–18 µm, mostly (sub)lageniform or (sub)fusiform, apex usually crystalliferous, without or with only a short neck and pedicel, walls up to 1.5 µm thick at the apex, pale yellowish-greenish with 3% KOH; intermixed with numerous (sub)clavate to subglobose cauloparacystidia. Clamp connections abundant in all tissues.

  • Habitat and distribution

  • Inocybe centesima was found by us on calcareous sandy terrain (inland dunes) with Pinus sylvestris in Germany. No other collections or sequences in databases are known to us.

  • Additional specimens examined

  • GERMANY, Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Sandhausen, Nature Reserve Galgenbuckel, TK25 6617/4, alt. 112 m, Pinus sylvestris, Helianthemum nummularium, 31 Oct. 2021, leg. D. & G. Bandini (SMNS-STU-F-0901750, DB31-10-21-1). Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Walldorf, TK25 6617/4, alt. 120 m, Pinus sylvestris, 6 Nov. 2021, leg. D. & G. Bandini (SMNS-STU-F-0901787, DB6-11-21-2). Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, St. Ilgen, TK25 6617/4, alt. 115 m, Pinus sylvestris, 14 Nov. 2021, leg. D. & G. Bandini (SMNS-STU-F-0901751, DB14-11-21-1).

  • Notes

  • Inocybe centesima is characterized by an at the centre pale brownish, outwards dark brown pileus colour with purple hue, smooth to at most rim(ul)ose pileus surface, only faint and fugacious pale greyish velipellis, an entirely pruinose stipe, rather large, smooth, mostly almost kidney-shaped spores and mostly (sub)fusiform hymenial cystidia. The shape of the spores of I. centesima is very unusual and the contrasting pileus colour of older basidiomata with purple tinges is quite extraordinary as well. Two species can be found at the same location: I. psammobrunnea Bon, differing from I. centesima, e.g., by the often large greyish patch at the centre of the pileus, with age up to intensely reddish-pinkish stipe, and shorter (sub)amygdaloid and not almost kidney-shaped spores (Bon 1990; Poirier 2002, as “I. griseotarda”; Bandini et al. 2021c), and I. tarda, also growing in the same location and which can be distinguished from I. centesima by, e.g., stipe with age often entirely reddish of different intensities, on average shorter (sub)amygdaloid and not almost kidney-shaped spores, on average longer hymenial cystidia and longer caulocystidia (Kühner 1955; Bandini et al. 2021c, 2022a). Inocybe tjallingiorum Kuyper usually has a darker centre of the pileus, no purple tinges in the pileus colour, stipe with age intense brown to red-brown or even darker, and much smaller, (sub)amygdaloid to (sub)ellipsoid spores (Kuyper 1986; Stangl 1989; Bandini et al. 2021c), whereas I. serotina has a larger, paler patch of velipellis at the pileus centre, larger, mostly (sub)amygdaloid and not almost kidney-shaped spores and mostly (sub)clavate or subglobose hymenial cystidia. Furthermore, I. serotina is usually found on sea-shores (Peck 1904; Lange 1940; Kuyper 1986; DB, personal observation). The Mediterranean species I. neorufula Esteve-Rav., Macau & Ferville differs from I. centesima, e.g., by the whitish velipellis, more reddish-tinged, much smaller, not almost kidney-shaped spores and on average longer hymenial cystidia (Esteve-Raventós et al. 2012; DB, personal observation), and I. rufuloides, e.g., by the lack of purple tinges in the pileus colour, less smooth pileus surface, (sub)amygdaloid or almost elliptic, not almost kidney-shaped spores and often subcapitate on average shorter hymenial cystidia (see below). Inocybe metrodii can be distinguished, e.g., by the darker centre of pileus and lack of purple tinges in the pileus colour, much smaller, not almost kidney-shaped spores, and habitat not on inland dunes but on richer soil (Stangl & Veselský 1979; Bandini et al. 2021c), I. phaeoleuca Kühner, e.g., by the lack of purple tinges in the pileus colour and the smaller and (sub)amygdaloid, not almost kidney-shaped spores (Kühner 1955; Kuyper 1986, as “I. splendens var. phaeoleuca”; Bandini et al. 2019c), and I. splendens R. Heim, e.g., by the shorter navicular and not almost kidney-shaped spores and on average longer hymenial cystidia, as well as growth with frondose trees (Heim 1931; Kuyper 1986, as “I. splendens var. splendens”; Bandini et al. 2019c).

  • The species clade of I. centesima is well supported (94/99/1). We are not aware of any ITS sequences more similar to I. centesima. No species genetically closely related to I. centesima are known as yet, and the sequences forming the sister clade of I. centesima are at most 95% similar. With only 86% identity in the ITS, I. pararubens Carteret & Reumaux is the most closely, yet quite distantly related described species. It differs from I. centesima, e.g., by the darker centre of pileus and lack of purple tinges in the pileus colour, smaller, (sub)amygdaloid to (sub)navicular spores and growth with frondose trees (Carteret & Reumaux 2012; DB, personal observation). Inocybe centesima is by all indications a rare species.

  • Inocybe rufuloides Bon, Doc. Mycol.14(no. 53): 28 (1984) (Fig. 7)

  • Selected description and iconography: Bon (1984, 1990); Kuyper (1986); Lantieri (2005); Bougher & Matheny (2011).

  • Typification

  • Holotype: FRANCE, Somme, Cayeux-sur-Mer, Brighton-La Mollière, Pinus, 18 May 1983, leg. M. Bon, J. Vast & G. Claus, (LIP-MB83038).

  • Epitype (designated here; MBT 10014038): GERMANY, Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Walldorf, TK25 6617/4, alt. 120 m, Pinus sylvestris, 6 Nov. 2021, leg. D. & G. Bandini (STU SMNS-STU-F-0901753; dupl. priv. herb. D.B. DB6-11-21-4).

  • Description

  • Pileus 10–40 mm wide, at first (sub)conical, later broadly convex or expanded, with or without a large umbo, margin at first slightly inflexed, soon deflexed, later straight or even uplifted when old and then depressed around the umbo; young basidiomata entirely covered by a greyish velipellis, still visible at the umbo of older basidiomata; colour brown to dark brown, often with reddish hue in different nuances (Mu 10YR 4/3–4/6, 3/4–3/6; 5YR 4/3–4/6; 7.5YR 4/4–4/6), but when young often greyish-brownish because of the velipellis; surface at first sometimes almost smooth, but usually finely tomentose to minutely lanose, with age coarsely lanose, sometimes somewhat lacerate; young basidiomata with faint remnants of a cortina. Lamellae rather distant (c. 25–35 (40), l = 1–3), thickish, narrowly to broadly adnate, (sub)ventricose, at first whitish, later greyish-brownish to brown with reddish hue; edge uneven fimbriate, whitish. Stipe 15–45 × 2–5 mm, stout, straight or curved, base often somewhat thickened, at first entirely covered with whitish tomentum, later longitudinally striate or glabrous, reddish brown at different intensities to intensely red-brown, base mostly remaining whitish; pruinose with sparse, rough pruina only near the apex of the stipe. Context whitish in the pileus, red-brown in the upper half of the stipe. Smell spermatic, at least when cut. Colour of exsiccata. Pileus pale brown, greyish-brownish (Mu 10YR 5/4–5/6, 4/2–4/6), lamellae and stipe concolorous or a little lighter in colour, no darkening or blackening on drying.

  • Spores 9.7–13.4 µm (av. 11.4 µm, SD 0.8 µm) × 5.5–7.1 µm (av. 6.4 µm, SD 0.3 µm); Q = 1.4–2.1 (av. 1.8, SD 0.1) (n = 120 of 3 coll.), smooth, oblong (sub)amygdaloid or almost elliptic, with or without a faint suprahilar depression, apex subacute to subobtuse, with indistinct pseudoporus. Basidia 25–32 × 9–12 µm, generally 4-spored, rarely also 2-spored. Pleurocystidia 34–69 µm (av. 48 µm, SD 7.3 µm) × 10–20 µm (av. 14 µm, SD 2.1 µm); Q = 2.3–4.8 (av. 3.4, SD 0.6) (n = 45 of 3 coll.), variously shaped, often subcapitate, (sub)cylindrical, (sub)utriform, (sub)fusiform, (sub)lageniform), sometimes even (sub)clavate, at the apex generally wide, mostly with only a short neck, with a short pedicel or with truncate base, apex usually crystalliferous, walls up to 1.5 (2.0) µm thick at the apex, often abruptly thickened at the neck, yellow-green with 3% KOH. Cheilocystidia similar in appearance and size, intermixed with numerous colourless to sometimes somewhat brownish, (sub)clavate, (sub)cylindrical or subglobose or somewhat deformed, thin- to slightly thick-walled, sometimes catenate paracystidia. Pileipellis constituted of an epicutis made up of parallel hyphae 4–12 µm wide, with encrusting and parietal brownish pigment, subcutis with wider and paler to colourless elements. Caulocystidia only near the apex of the stipe, 30–60 × 10–15 µm, (sub)utriform, (sub)cylindrical or even (sub)clavate, but mostly somewhat deformed and often with undate walls, without or with only a short neck, without or with a short pedicel or with truncate base, apex crystalliferous or not, walls up to 1.0 (1.5) µm thick at the apex, yellow-green with 3% KOH; intermixed with numerous, mostly but sometimes somewhat brownish, (sub)clavate to subglobose, thin-walled colourless cauloparacystidia. Clamp connections abundant in all tissues.

  • Habitat and distribution

  • Inocybe rufuloides was found by us only in the calcareous sand of inland dunes or adjacent areas, always with Pinus sylvestris nearby. However, only Quercus was recorded for the collection from Algeria. The taxon appears to correspond to SH0146902.09FU, 3%, which includes specimen sequences from Algeria, Australia, Italy, Germany and Spain, an EcM sequence from France and soil sample sequences from Italy and Morocco. Based on this, the species appears to be widely distributed and not rare. Bougher & Matheny (2011) considered I. rufuloides as an introduced taxon in Australia.

  • Additional specimens e„xamined

  • ALGERIA, Bainem, Quercus ilex, 31 Dec. 2014, leg. S. Aouali (DB31-12-14-Aouali). GERMANY, Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Sandhausen, Nature Reserve “Düne Pferdstrieb”, TK25 6617/4, alt. 100 m, Pinus sylvestris, Quercus robur, Helianthemum, 13 Oct. 2012, leg. D. BANDINI, B. Oertel & W. Winterhoff (SMNS-STU-F-0901442, DB13-10-12-4). Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Sandhausen, TK25 6617/4, alt. 113 m, Pinus sylvestris, Helianthemum, Quercus robur, 21 Oct. 2012, leg. D. Bandini & B. Oertel (DB21-10-12-14). Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Sandhausen, Nature Reserve “Düne Pferdstrieb”, TK25 6617/4, alt. 113 m, Pinus sylvestris, 23 Oct. 2021, leg. D. & G. Bandini (DB23-10-21-2). Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Sandhausen, Nature Reserve “Galgenbuckel”, TK25 6617/4, alt. 112 m, Pinus sylvestris, Helianthemum nummularium, 31 Oct. 2021, leg. D. & G. BANDINI (SMNS-STU-F-0901752, DB31-10-21-5). Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Sandhausen, Nature Reserve “Galgenbuckel”, TK 6617/4, alt. 112 m, Pinus sylvestris, Helianthemum nummularium, 6 Nov. 2021, leg. D. & G. Bandini (DB6-11-21-4). Baden-Württemberg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Walldorf, TK25 6617/4, alt. 120 m, Pinus sylvestris, 6 Nov. 2021, leg. D. & G. Bandini (DB6-11-21-5).

  • Notes

  • A description of the holotype was given in Bandini et al. (2020c). We have tried and failed to generate PCR products from this collection; others appear to have failed, too. According to our experience, it is only rarely possible to successfully sequence material collected by M. BON. We decided to choose an epitype for the species as the type material did not display all morphological details necessary for its delimitation, for instance the caulocystidia at the top of the stipe and the paracystidia of young basidiomes. In the protologue, Bon (1984) described the latter as abundant and sometimes catenate. A plate of the microscopic details and measurements of the spores and pleurocystidia of the type were published in Bandini et al. (2020c).

  • Inocybe rufuloides is characterized by a usually rather stout habit, brown to dark brown pileus colour with more or less intense reddish hue, with age mostly lanose pileus surface, abundant pale greyish velipellis, stipe with age up to intensely red-brown, pruinose only near the apex, rather large spores, and often subcapitate hymenial cystidia with many, sometimes catenate and slightly thick-walled paracystidia. Inocybe carneicaulis E. Ludw. differs, e.g., by the smoother pileus surface, usually quite uniformly (sub)fusiform, usually not (sub)capitate hymenial cystidia and not catenate or slightly thick-walled paracystidia (Ludwig 2017; DB, personal observation), I. coriacea, e.g., by the smaller and less stout basidiomata, usually paler pileus colour, on average smaller spores and usually not subcapitate hymenial cystidia (Bandini et al. 2022c), and I. deianae Eyssart., e.g., by the velipellis usually not remaining at the centre of the pileus of older basidiomata, on average shorter spores and usually not subcapitate hymenial cystidia (Eyssartier 2007; Brugaletta et al. 2019, as “I. lapidicola”; Bandini et al. 2022a). Inocybe distantifolia E. Ludw. can be distinguished from I. rufuloides, e.g., by the smaller pileus, smoother pileus surface, on average smaller spores and usually not subcapitate hymenial cystidia (Ludwig 2017), and I. laurina Bandini, B. Oertel & C. Hahn, a species found by us next to I. rufuloides, can be distinguished from the latter, e.g., by the whitish velipellis, smoother pileus surface, smaller spores and longer, usually not subcapitate hymenial cystidia (Bandini et al. 2020a). Inocybe psammobrunnea has a smoother pileus surface, smaller spores and on average longer and usually not subcapitate hymenial cystidia (Bon 1990; Poirier 2002 (as “I. griseotarda”); Bandini et al. 2021c), I. neorufula has a whitish velipellis, smoother pileus surface and smaller spores (Esteve-Raventós et al. 2012; DB, pers. obs.) and I. rufobrunnea has a smoother pileus surface, larger spores and usually not subcapitate hymenial cystidia (Favre 1955; Kuyper 1986, as “I. rufuloides var. exilis”; Bandini et al. 2022b). Inocybe tarda differs from I. rufuloides, e.g., by having less velipellis, a smoother pileus surface, on average shorter spores and on average longer, usually not subcapitate hymenial cystidia (Kühner 1955; Bandini et al. 2021c, 2022a).

  • Inocybe rufuloides is well supported (97/100/1) and well delimited in Fig. 1, in a clade including a number of unnamed sequences. Among the described and sequenced species, I. filiana is most similar in the ITS to I. rufuloides (87%). This species differs from I. rufuloides, e.g., by the usually smaller and more fragile basidiomata, usually smoother pileus surface, smaller spores and not often subcapitate hymenial cystidia (Bandini et al. 2022b).

  • Discussion

    The species described in depth above, I. albomarginata, I. amblyospora, I. bonii, I. carolina, I. centesima and I. rufuloides, are well delimited and distinguishable from all other known species morphologically and molecularly. However, for narrowing down the species limits of I. bonii (and to a lesser extend I. carolina), further studies will be necessary to find out whether sister clades of environmental sequences of I. bonii and I. carolina s. str. are artefactual or not. These studies would include the analysis of additional loci and study of basidiomata that are phylogenetically (ITS) representatives of the sequences that are neither clearly belonging to nor clearly distinct from clades with sequences from material with known morphology. We have kept the inclusion of soil sequences at a minimum, because it is often not clear whether the variation found within these sequences is due to sequence variants not obvious in Sanger sequences or to sequence errors. The included environmental sequences were used to show how clear or not the molecular identification and delimitation of the new taxon was.

    All six species named above belong to clades that have also been retrieved in earlier studies (Bandini et al. 2020c, 2021c, 2022a, 2022b), but leaving out many clades in between. Fig. 1 supports earlier results that morphological characters used for identification are a poor predictor for phylogenetic results: While three species with small spores and entirely pruinose stipes, I. albomarginata, I. amblyospora and I. pseudoreducta, are all in the same supported clade (Fig. 1, part 2), I. bonii, with the same characters, is not. Inocybe centesima (Fig. 1, part 1) is phylogenetically supported as a member of the I. splendens clade in a wider sense, including species with and without trademark Splendentes characters. The supported clade depicted in Fig. 1, part 4, starting from I. cincinnata down to I. carolina, contradicts in part supported results in Bandini et al. (2021c, 2022b); subclades, however, were consistent (taking into account that the sets of included species were different). In terms of consistent results, I. carolina is probably best considered as a member of the flocculosa clade.

    The three new species described above were from calcareous habitats, and two of them, I. carolina and I. centesima, seem to associate, possibly even exclusively, with Pinus. Furthermore, they were found on inland dunes, a very special habitat that is at times very dry and hot, in open terrain in an old limestone quarry, and in sun-lit gravelly ground on the side of a road. Only a few weeks per year, if at all, inocybes can be found there.

    Inocybe carolina and I. centesima also have in common that they are very constant in their characteristics, since both the macroscopic aspect and the microscopic details in all collections of both species are very consistent. This is rather rare among the Inocybaceae, since generally either the macroscopic or the microscopic characters, or both, vary, sometimes significantly, as can be observed within the third new species, I. bonii, where the macroscopic aspect can be quite different from collection to collection (see Fig. 4a, b). The habitat of I. bonii is not as extreme as that of the other two species, but it is also very dry at times and strictly calcareous. Inocybe bonii has quite small spores and an entirely, though in the lower half often rather sparsely, pruinose stipe. Therefore, and because the macroscopic aspect is quite variable, this species can be mistaken for several other species with small spores and an entirely pruinose stipe or stipe pruinose only near the apex, as for instance I. albomarginata, I. pseudoreducta and I. suecica, or even I. virgatula, which macroscopically may look like the type collection of I. bonii. Because I. albomarginata and I. amblyospora are sometimes confused with each other or with other species (see above), we decided to give portraits of both species and select an epitype for I. albomarginata, the lectotype of which, being preserved in formaldehyde together with several fruitbodies belonging to other genera, is in very bad condition.

    According to the key of Bon (1997a), I. centesima would belong to the Section Splendentes R. Heim ex Singer, which groups species with an entirely pruinose stipe. Demonstrating a problem associated with Bon's classification, Inocybe bonii could be included either in the section Splendentes or in the section Tardae because of the stipe only sparsely pruinose in the lower half. Inocybe carolina belongs to the section Tardae (Bon 1997a).

    Inoybe carolina has been found more often in Spain than in central Europe and forms a clade phylogenetically embedded among other species (I. aurantiobrunnea) or clades representing Unite sh with proponents from areas with hot summers. For I. carolina, it is tempting to assume a southerly origin, or at least a strictly Mediterranean distribution after the last glacial period, and a temperature-driven northward expansion. Větrovský et al. (2019), in their meta-study of fungal distribution patterns, posited that temperature is one of the main drivers of species distribution. With increasing temperatures, one might expect an increasing number of species like I. tigrina (Bandini et al. 2021c) with a large distribution area covering both Southern and Central Europe and potentially even Northern Europe. However, if Větrovský et al. (2019) was correct about the narrower climatic tolerances of ectomycorrhizal fungi in comparison to other fungi, distribution areas might shift northwards rather than extend.

    Species with updated typification

    Inocybe geophylla (Bull.) P. Kumm., Führer Pilzk.: 78 (1871)

  • Basionym: Agaricus geophyllus Bull., Herb. France 11: pl. 522, fig. 2 (1791).

  • Typification

  • Lectotype, designated here (MBT 10003226): Bulliard (1791), Herbier de la France 11: pl. 522, fig. 2 (Agaricus geophyllus).

  • Epitype, selected in Bandini et al. (2021c: 1058): AUSTRIA, Tirol, Reutte, Höfen, ÖK25V 2215-West, alt. 970 m, Picea abies, 23 Sep. 2015, leg. D. Bandini (STU SMNS-STU-F-0901531; dupl. priv. herb. D.B. DB23-9-15-31).

  • Notes

  • This species was discussed in detail and epitypified in Bandini et al. (2021c). The here designated lectotype was cited as the holotype in the latter publication. As mentioned in the introduction, epitypes only serve as interpretative types for the material that is cited in the epitypification and not for syntypes. For purposes of epitypification, illustrations are better considered lectotypes, because illustrations cannot represent the entire type that ever existed. Furthermore, the designation of an illustration as lectotype, rather than citing it merely as holotype, protects the epitypification against other illustrations, variations of the same illustration, etc. that might exist and could be considered syntypes based on the original description. Lectotypification in cases such as this (even if no competing syntype is known at the time) avoids potential ambiguity and ensures nomenclatural stability. With this in mind, we decided to follow up the earlier epitypification with a lectotypification.

  • Inocybe griseovelata Kühner, Bull. Soc. Naturalistes. Oyonnax 9(Suppl. (Mém. hors sér. 1)): 4 (1955)

  • Typification

  • Lectotype, designated here (MBT 10014039): FRANCE, Paris, Bois de Vincennes, in a circle of more than 20 fruiting bodies on soil, with frondose trees, near the lake, 8 Jun.1930, leg. R. KÜHNER (G00058738)

  • Notes

  • The collection date of this collection agrees with the protologue. This lectotypification supersedes the lectotypification of Bandini et al. (2021c) [Art. 9.12 (Turland et al. 2018)], who selected a collection with a (presumed) earlier collection date because the above collection seemed to have been lost, when ordered by us in 2018. In the above publication, we cited a wrong G accession number for the earlier collection; the correct number for that specimen is G00566267. The collection G00058738, from June 8th 1930, was suggested earlier as lectotype by J. Poirier (herbarium note, 16 Jan. 1995), but this was, to the best of our knowledge, never formally published. With the correction of the lectotypification, also the epitype SMNS-STU-F-0901568 designated in Bandini et al. (2022a) loses its standing (Art. 9.20. Note 8). We have not had the opportunity to study the lectotype G00058738. Therefore, it would be premature to assign an epitype. The species was discussed in detail in Bandini et al. (2021c, 2022a).

  • Inocybe hirtella Bres., Fungi Trident. 1(4–5): 52 (1884)

  • Typification

  • Lectotype, designated here (MBT 10006582): ITALY, northern Italy. Bresadola (1884) Fungi Trident., 1(4-5): plate 58, fig. 1.

  • Epitype, selected in Bandini et al. (2022b: 118): GERMANY, Niedersachsen, Emsland, Haselünne, TK25 3310/4, alt. 20 m, Corylus avellana, Quercus robur, Pinus sylvestris, 4 Oct. 2020, D. Bandini (STU SMNS-STU-F-0901607; dupl. priv. herb. D.B. DB4-10-20-19).

  • Notes

  • The species was discussed in detail in Bandini et al. (2022b). The selected illustration was cited as holotype there. See under I. geophylla for an explanation of the lectotypification.

  • Inocybe tarda Kühner, Bull. Soc. Naturalistes Oyonnax 9 (Suppl. (Mém. hors sér. 1)): 6 (1955)

  • Typification

  • Lectotype, designated by Poirier (2016: 55): FRANCE, Paris, Bois de Vincennes, Pinus, 22. Nov. 1933, leg. R. Kühner (G00058745).

  • Epitype, selected in Bandini et al. (2022a: 55): GERMANY, Rheinland-Pfalz, Rhein-Pfalz-Kreis, near Dudenhofen, TK25 6616/3, alt. 105 m, sandy soil with Quercus robur, Corylus avellana, Pinus sylvestris, 3 Oct. 2017, leg. D. Bandini (STU SMNS-STU-F-0901730; dupl. priv. herb. D.B. DB3-10-17-6).

  • Notes

  • The species was discussed in detail and epitypified in Bandini et al. (2022a). The lectotype was cited as holotype in the latter publication. Kühner (1955) did not cite collection numbers. Other material from the same place and date might exist that would have to be considered as syntype had the lectotypification not been done by Poirier (2016). Epitypes only serve as interpretative types for the material that is cited in the epitypification and not for syntypes. Thus, the typification of I. tarda is settled and less ambiguous than one might conclude from Bandini et al. (2022a).

  • Inocybe tigrina R. Heim, Encyclop. Mycol., 1 Le Genre Inocybe (Paris): 230 (1931)

  • Typification

  • Lectotype, designated here (MBT 10015420): FRANCE, near Meaux, Pinus, Oct. 1929, leg. Mauguin. Heim (1931) Le Genre Inocybe, Plate XIX, fig. 6.

  • Epitype, designated in Bandini et al. (2021c: 1099): GERMANY, Rheinland-Pfalz, Bad Kreuznach, Lützelsoon, near Kellenbach, alt. 400 m, Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica, Pseudotsuga menziesii, 24 Oct. 2015, leg. D. Bandini & B. Oertel (STU SMNS-STU-F-0901532; dupl. priv. herb. D.B. DB24-10-15-3).

  • Notes

  • The species was discussed in detail in Bandini et al. (2021c). The here-designated lectotype was listed as holotype there. See under I. geophylla for an explanation of the lectotypification.

  • Inocybe transitoria (Britzelm.) Sacc., Syll. fung. 5: 788 (1887)

  • Basionym: Agaricus transitorius Britzelm., Ber. Naturhist. Vereins Augsburg 26: 137 (1881).

  • Typification

  • Lectotype, designated here (MBT 10015421): GERMANY, Bayern, Krumbach. Britzelmayr (1881), Ber. Naturhist. Vereins Augsburg 26: Abb. 11.

  • Epitype, selected in Bandini et al. (2022a: 58): NORWAY, Telemark, Kragerø, Kammerfossåsen, Tilia, Fraxinus, Populus forest on clay ground, margin of meadow, under Tilia and Populus, 15 Jul. 2016, leg. T. E. Brandrud TEB-45-16 (O-F-304850).

  • Notes

  • The species was discussed in detail in Bandini et al. (2022a). The illustration designated as lectotype here was cited as holotype in the latter publication. A collection by J. STANGL deposited in M (M-0022272) and referred to by Stangl & Kuyper (1985) and Stangl (1989) is labelled as neotype but was apparently never published as type, neither (incorrectly) as neotype nor as epitype. See under I. geophylla for an explanation of the lectotypification.

  • Funding

    This study was financed by the authors and the ‘Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Naturkundemuseums Stuttgart’. Other than the authors, the funders had no influence on the research and this manuscript.

    Acknowledgements

    We are grateful to curators Christian Lange (C), Régis Courtecuisse (LIP) and Ondřej Koukol (PRC) for information and the loan of types in their keeping and are grateful to Holger Thüs (SMNS) for handling the numerous loans for us. We are indebted to Michèle Gendre and Juan Carlos Zamora (G), e.g., for pointing out missing lectotypifications to us. Justice BabicTrammell is thanked for her support of the molecular work in Stuttgart. We again greatly appreciate the help of Shaun R. Pennycook and Volker Braun with all kinds of questions around types and nomenclature.

    Molecular analyses (sequencing) were carried out within the framework of the Mycoseq project of the Mycological Society of France (SMF, Paris) and the Centre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology (CEFE, Montpellier), and at Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart. The ‘Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Naturkundemuseums Stuttgart’ is thanked for their financial support.

    We would furthermore like to express our gratitude to Souhila Aouali, Antonio Díaz-Fernández, Eckhard PreikSchas and José Antonio Rodea-Butragueño for providing us with fresh collections or specimens or for other help.

    © Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart

    References

    1.

    Abarenkov, K., Zirk, A., Piirmann, T., Pöhönen, R., Ivanov, F., Nilsson, R. H. & Kõljalg, U. (2022): Full UNITE+INSD dataset for Fungi. 16.10.2022. UNITE Community.  https://doi.org/10.15156/BIO/2483925 Google Scholar

    2.

    Argüelles-Moyao, A., Garibay-Orijel, R., Márquez-Valdelamar, L. M. & Arellano-Torres, E. (2017): Clavulina-Membranomyces is the most important lineage within the highly diverse ectomycorrhizal fungal community of Abies religiosa. – Mycorrhiza 27 (1): 53–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0724-1 Google Scholar

    3.

    Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Zwickl, D. J., Beerli, P., Holder, M. T., Lewis, P. O., Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Swofford, D. L., Cummings, M. P., Rambaut, A. & Suchard, M. A. (2012): BEAGLE: an application programming interface for statistical phylogenetics. – Systematic Biolology 61: 170–173.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syr100 Google Scholar

    4.

    Bandini, D., Brandrud, T. E., Dima, D., Dondl, M., Fachada, V., Hussong, A., Mifsud, S., Oertel, B., Rodríguez Campo, F. J., Thüs, H., Vauras, J., Weholt, Ø. & Eberhardt, U. (2022a): Fibre caps across Europe: type studies and 11 new species of Inocybe (Agaricales, Basidiomycota). – Integrative Systematics 5 (2): 1–85.  https://doi.org/10.18476/2022.901982Google Scholar

    5.

    Bandini, D., Christan, J., Eberhardt, U., Ploch, S., Tahir, A., Oertel, B. & Thines, M. (2017): Inocybe sphagnophila sp. nov., eine neue Art der höckersporigen Untersektion Napi-pedinae der Gattung Inocybe (Agaricales). – Mycologia Bavarica 18: 11–34. Google Scholar

    6.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B. & Eberhardt, U. (2021a): Noch mehr Risspilze (2): Dreizehn neue Arten der Familie Inocybaceae. – Mycologia Bavarica 21: 27–98. Google Scholar

    7.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B. & Eberhardt, U. (2021b): Inocybe blan-dula, eine neue höckersporige Art der Gattung Inocybe, Sektion Marginatae. – Zeitschrift für Mykologie 87 (2): 211–228. Google Scholar

    8.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B. & Eberhardt, U. (2021c): A fresh outlook on the smooth-spored species of Inocybe: type studies and 18 new species. – Mycological Progress 20: 1019–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01712-w Google Scholar

    9.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B. & Eberhardt, U. (2022b): More smooth-spored species of Inocybe (Agaricales, Basidiomycota): type studies and 12 new species from Europe. – Persoonia 48: 91–149.  http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2022.48.03 Google Scholar

    10.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B. & Eberhardt, U. (2022c): Noch mehr Risspilze (3): Einundzwanzig neue Arten der Familie Inocybaceae. – Mycologia Bavarica 22: 31–138. Google Scholar

    11.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B. & Eberhardt, U. (2023): Noch mehr Risspilze (4): Vierzehn neue Arten der Familie Inocybaceae. – Mycologia Bavarica 23: 1–50. Google Scholar

    12.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B., Moreau, P.-A., Thines, M. & Ploch, S. (2019a): Three new hygrophilous species of Inocybe, subgenus Inocybe. – Mycological Progress 18: 1101–1119.  https://doi:10.1007/s11557-019-01509-y Google Scholar

    13.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B., Ploch, S., Ali, T., Vauras, J., Schneider, A., Scholler, M., Eberhardt, U. & Thines, M. (2019b): Revision of some central European species of Inocybe (Fr.: Fr.) Fr. subgenus Inocybe, with the description of five new species. – Mycological Progress 18: 247–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1439-9 Google Scholar

    14.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B., Ploch, S. & Thines, M. (2019c): Inocybe heidelbergensis, eine neue Risspilz-Art der Untergattung Inocybe. – Zeitschrift für Mykologie 85 (2): 195–213. Google Scholar

    15.

    Bandini, D., Oertel, B., Schüssler, C. & Eberhardt, E. (2020a): Noch mehr Risspilze: Fünfzehn neue und zwei wenig bekannte Arten der Gattung Inocybe. – Mycologia Bavarica 20: 13–101. Google Scholar

    16.

    Bandini, D., Sesli, E., Oertel, B. & Krisai-Greilhuber, I. (2020b): Inocybe antoniniana, a new species of Inocybe section Marginatae with nodulose spores. – Sydowia 72: 95–106.  https://doi.org/10.12905/0380.sydowia72-2020-0095 Google Scholar

    17.

    Bandini, D., Vauras, J., Weholt, Ø., Oertel, B. & Eberhardt, U. (2020c): Inocybe woglindeana, a new species of the genus Inocybe, thriving in exposed habitats with calcareous sandy soil. – Karstenia 58: 41–59.  https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.2020.488 Google Scholar

    18.

    Bhunjun, C. S., Niskanen, T., Suwannarach, N., Chen, Y.-J., Mckenzie, E. H. C., Maharachchikumbura, S. S. N., Buyck, B., Zhao, C.-L., Fan, Y.-G., Zhang, J.-Y., Dissanayake, A. J., Marasinghe, D. S., Jayawardena, R. S., Kumla, J., Padamsee, M., Chen, Y.-Y., Llimatainen, K., Ammarati, J. F., Phukhamsakda, C., Liu, J.-K., Phonrob, W., Randrianjohany, É., Hongsanan, S., Cheewangkoon, R., Bundhun, D., Khuna, S., Yu, W.-J., Deng, L.-S., Lu, Y.-Z., Hyde, K. D. & Lumyong, S. (2022): The numbers of fungi: are the most speciose genera truly diverse? – Fungal Diversity 114 (1): 387–462.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-022-00502-3 Google Scholar

    19.

    Bizio, E., Ferisin, G. & Dovana, F. (2016): Inocybe costinitii. A new species from the Istrian coast. – Micologia e Vegetazione Mediterranea 31 (2): 95–102. Google Scholar

    20.

    Bon, M. (1984): Macromycètes de la zone maritime picarde (8ème supplément). Les inocybes sabulicoles. – Documents Mycologiques 14: 9–40. Google Scholar

    21.

    Bon, M. (1990): Flore mycologique du littoral – 05 – Inocybe. – Documents Mycologiques 20 (78): 61–66. Google Scholar

    22.

    Bon, M. (1997a): Clé monographique du genre Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. (2ème partie). – Documents Mycologiques 27 (108): 1–77. Google Scholar

    23.

    Bon, M. (1997b): Clé monographique des inocybes alpins. – Bulletin Trimestriel Féderation Mycologique Dauphiné-Savoie 37 (144): 71–109. Google Scholar

    24.

    Bon, M. (1998): Clé monographique du genre Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. (3ème partie). – Documents Mycologiques 28 (111): 1–45. Google Scholar

    25.

    Bougher, N. L. & Matheny, P. B. (2011): Two species of Inocybe (fungi) introduced into Western Australia. – Nuytsia 21 (3): 139–148. Google Scholar

    26.

    Bresadola, G. (1884): Fungi Tridentini, novi vel nondum delineati, descripti et iconibus illustrati. Volume 1 (fasc. 4–5), pp. 43–70; Trient [= Trento] (J. Zippel). Google Scholar

    27.

    Britzelmayr, M. (1881): Hyporhodii und Leucospori aus Südbayern (Hymenomyceten aus Südbayern 2). – Berichte des Naturhistorischen Vereins in Augsburg 26: 133–148. Google Scholar

    28.

    Brugaletta, E., Consiglio, G. & Marchetti, M. (2019): Inocybe lapidicola, una nuova specie della Sicilia. – Rivista di Micologia 62 (2): 99–117. Google Scholar

    29.

    Bulliard, P. (1791): Herbier de la France ou collection complète des plantes indigènes de ce royaume; avec leurs details anatomiques, leurs propriétés, et leurs usages en médecine. Volume 11, pp. 481–528; Paris (Didot Jeune). Google Scholar

    30.

    Carteret, X. & Reumaux, P. (2012): Miettes sur les inocybes (6ème série), études de quelques nains des feuillus de la plaine, accompagnée d'une clé de détermination des taxons de la section Lilacinae R. Heim. – Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 127 (1–2) (2011): 1–53. Google Scholar

    31.

    Cervini, M. (2021): Inocybe messapica (Inocybaceae, Agaricales, Basidiomycota), a new species in section Splendentes, from Mediterranean oak woods. – Phytotaxa 480 (2): 174–184.  https://www.biotaxa.org/Phytotaxa/article/view/phytotaxa.480.2.6  Google Scholar

    32.

    Cripps, C., Eberhardt, U., Schütz, N., Beker, H. J., Evenson, V. S. & Horak, E. (2019a): The genus Hebeloma in the Rocky Mountain alpine zone. – MycoKeys 46: 1–54.  https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.46.32823 Google Scholar

    33.

    Cripps, C. L., Larsson, E. & Vauras, J. (2019b). Nodulose-spored Inocybe from the Rocky Mountain alpine zone molecularly linked to European and type specimens. – Mycologia 112: 133–153.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2019.1677419 Google Scholar

    34.

    Crous, P. W., Cowan, D. A., Maggs-Kölling, G., Yilmaz, N., Thangavel, R., Wingfield, M. J., Noordeloos, M. E., Dima, B., Brandrud, T. E., Jansen, G. M., Morozova, O. V., Vila, J., Shivas, R. G., Tan, Y. P., Bishop-Hurley, S., Lacey, E., Marney, T. S., Larsson, E., Le Floch, G., Lombard, L., Nodet, P., Hubka, V., Alvarado, P., Berraf-Tebbal, A., Reyes, J. D., Delgado, G., Eichmeier, A., Jordal, J. B., Kachalkin, A. V., Kubátová, A., Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Malysheva, E. F., Papp, V., Rajeshkumar, K. C., Sharma, A., Spetik, M., Szabóová, D., Tomashevskaya, M. A., Abad, J. A., Abad, Z. G., Alexandrova, A. V., Anand, G., Arenas, F., Ashtekar, N., Balashov, S., Bañares, Á., Baroncelli, R., Bera, I., Biketova, A. YU., Blomquist, C. L., Boekhout, T., Boertmann, D., Bulyonkova, T. M., Burgess, T. I., Carnegie, A. J., Cobo-Diaz, J. F., Corriol, G., Cunnington, J. H., Da Cruz, M. O., Damm, U., Davoodian, N., De A. Santiago, A. L. C. M., Dearnaley, J., De Freitas, L. W. S., Dhileepan, K., Dimitrov, R., Di Piazza, S., Fatima, S., Fuljer, F., Galera, H., Ghosh, A., Giraldo, A., Glushakova, A. M., Gorczak, M., Gouliamova, D. E., Gramaje, D., Groenewald, M., Gunsch, C. K., Gutiérrez, A., Holdom, D., Houbraken, J., Ismailov, A. B., Istel, Ł., Iturriaga, T., Jeppson, M., Jurjević, Ž., Kalinina, L. B., Kapitonov, V. I., Kautmanova, I., Khalid, A. N., Kiran, M., Kiss, L., Kovács, Á., Kurose, D., Kusan, I., Lad, S., Læssøe, T., Lee, H. B., Luangsa-Ard, J. J., Lynch, M., Mahamedi, A. E., Malysheva, V. F., Mateos, A., Matočec, N., Mešić, A., Miller, A. N., Mongkolsamrit, S., Moreno, G., Morte, A., Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa, R., Naseer, A., Navarroródenas, A., Nguyen, T. T. T., Noisripoom, W., Ntandu, J. E., Nuytinck, J., Ostrý, V., Pankratov, T. A., Pawłowska, J., Pecenka, J., Pham, T. H. G., Polhorský, A., Posta, A., Raudabaugh, D. B., Reschke, K., Rodríguez, A., Romero, M., Rooney-Latham, S., Roux, J., Sandoval-Denis, M., Smith, M. TH., Steinrucken, T. V., Svetasheva, T. Y., Tkalčec, Z., Van Der Linde, E. J., V. D. Vegte, M., Vauras, J ., Verbeken, A., Visagie, C. M., Vitelli, J. S., Volobuev, S. V., Weill, A., Wrzosek, M., Zmitrovich, I. V., Zvyagina, E. A. & Groenewald, J. Z. (2021): Fungal Planet description sheets : 1182–1283.– Persoonia 46: 313–528.  https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.11  Google Scholar

    35.

    Crous, P. W., Boers, J., Holdom, D., Osieck; Steinrucken, T. V., Tan, Y. P., Vitelli, J. S., Shivas, R. G., Barrett, M., Box-Shall, A. -G., Broadbridge, J., Larsson, E., Lebel, T., Pinruan, U., Sommai, S., Alvarado, P., Bonito, G., Decock, C. A., De La Peña-Lastra, S., Delgado, G., Houbraken, J., Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Raja, H. A., Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., Rodríguez, A., Wingfield, M. J., Adams, S. J., Akulov, A., Al-Hidmi, T., Antonín, V., Arauzo, S., Arenas, F., Armada, F., Aylward, J., Bellanger, J.-M., Berraf-Tebbal, A., Bidaud, A., Boccardo, F., Cabero, J., Calledda, F., Corriol, G., Crane, J. L., Dearnaley, J. D. W., Dima, B., Dovana, F., Eichmeier, A., Esteve-Raventós, F., Fine, M., Ganzert, L., García, D., Torres-Garcia, D., Gené, J., Gutiérrez, A., Iglesias, P., Istel, Ł., Jangsantear, P., Jansen, G. M., Jeppson, M., Karun, N. C., Karich, A., Khamsuntorn, P., Kokkonen, K., Kolarík, M., Kubátová, A., Labuda, R., Lagashetti, A. C., Lifshitz, N., Linde, C., Loizides, M., Luangsa-Ard, J. J., Lueangjaroenkit, P., Mahadevakumar, S., Mahamedi, A. E., Malloch, D. W., Marincowitz, S., Mateos, A., Moreau, P. -A., Miller, A. N., Molia, A., Morte, A., Navarro-Ródenas, A., Nebesářová, J., Nigrone, E., Nuthan, B. R., Oberlies, N. H., Pepori, A. L., Rämä, T., Rapley, D., Reschke, K., Robicheau, B. M., Roets, F., Roux, J., Saavedra, M., Sakolrak, B., Santini, A., Ševčíková, H., Singh, P. N., Singh, S. K., Somrithipol, S., Spetik, M., Sridhar, K. R., Starinkwillemse, M., Taylor, V. A., Van Iperen, A. L., Vauras, J., Walker, A. K., Wingfield, B. D., Yarden, O., Cooke, A. W., Manners, A. G., Pegg, K. G., Groenewald, J. Z. (2022): Fungal Planet description sheets: 1383–1435.– Persoonia 48: 261–371.  https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2022.48.08  Google Scholar

    36.

    Dovana, F., Bizio, E., Garbelotto, M. & Ferisin, G. (2021): Inocybe cervenianensis (Agaricales, Inocybaceae), a new species in the I. flavoalbida clade from Italy. – Phytotaxa 484 (2): 227–236.  https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.484.2.7 Google Scholar

    37.

    Eberhardt, U., Grilli, E., Schütz, N., Bartlett, P. & Beker, H. J. (2023): Old but not obsolete: a new life for some of Murrill's (Hebeloma) names. – Mycologia 15 (3): 375–426.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2023.2188387 Google Scholar

    38.

    Esteve-Raventós, F., García Blanco, A., Sanz Caraso, M. & Del Val, J. B. (2003): Inocybe aurantiobrunnea and I. pseu-doorbata, two new mediterranean species found in the Iberian Peninsula. – Österreichische Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 12: 89–99. Google Scholar

    39.

    Esteve-Raventós, F., Macau, N. & Ferville, A. (2012): Inocybe neorufula sp. nov., un nouveau nom pour I. rufula au sens de Malençon. – Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 127 (2011): 189–200. Google Scholar

    40.

    Eyssartier, G. (2007): Inocybe deianae sp. nov., un taxon proche d'Inocybe tenuicystidiata. – Bulletin Mycologique et Botanique Dauphiné-Savoie 186: 35–42. Google Scholar

    41.

    Fan, Y.-G. & Bau, T. (2010): A revised checklist of the genus Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. in China. – Journal of Fungal Research 8 (4): 189–193. Google Scholar

    42.

    Fan, Y.-G. & Bau, T. (2013): Two striking Inocybe species from Yunnan Province, China. – Mycotaxon 123 (1): 169–181.  https://doi.org/10.5248/123.169 Google Scholar

    43.

    Fan, Y.-G. & Bau, T. (2020): Two new smooth-spored species of Inocybe (Inocybaceae, Agaricales) from Gansu Province, northwestern China. – Mycosystema 39(9): 1694–1705. Google Scholar

    44.

    Fan, Y.-G., Wu, R. H. & Bau, T. (2018): Two new species and eight newly recorded species of Inocybe subg. Inocybe from China. – Journal of Fungal Research 16 (2): 70–83. Google Scholar

    45.

    Favre, J. (1955) Les champignons supérieurs de la zone alpine du Parc national Suisse. – Ergebnisse der Wissenschaftlichen Untersuchungen des Schweizerischen Nationalparks 5: 1–212. Google Scholar

    46.

    Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W. & Gascuel, O. (2010): New algorithms and methods to estimate Maximum-Likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. – Systematic Biology 59: 307–321.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010 Google Scholar

    47.

    He, P.-M., Fan, Y.-G., Deng, L.-S. & Yu, W.-J. (2022): Inocybe carpinicola (Inocybaceae, Agaricales), a new nodulose-spored species from Hainan Province, China. – Phytotaxa 575 (1): 79–88.  https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.575.1.5 Google Scholar

    48.

    Heim, R. (1931): Le genre Inocybe (Encyclopédie Mycologique), 429 pp.; Paris (Lechevalier). Google Scholar

    49.

    Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., Haeseler, A. Von, Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. (2018): UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. – Molecular Biology Evolution 35: 518–522.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281 Google Scholar

    50.

    Holmgren, P. K., Holmgren, N. H. & Barnett, L. C. (1990): Index Herbariorum, 8th edition, 394 pp.; New York (Botanic Garden). Google Scholar

    51.

    Johnson, M., Zaretskaya, I., Raytselis, Y., Merezhuk, Y., Mcginnis, S. & Madden, T. L. (2008): NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. – Nucleic Acids Research 36 (Web Server issue): W5–W9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn201 Google Scholar

    52.

    Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H. & Miyata, T. (2005): MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. – Nucleic Acids Research 33: 511–518.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki198 Google Scholar

    53.

    Katoh, K., Rozewicki, J. & Yamada, K. D. (2019): MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. – Briefings in Bioinformatics 20: 1160–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108 Google Scholar

    54.

    Kim, C. S., Jo, J. W., Kwag, Y. N., Sung, G. H., Lee, S. G., Kim, S. Y., Shin, C. H. & Han, S. K. (2015): Mushroom flora of Ulleung-gun and a newly recorded Bovista species in the Republic of Korea. – Mycobiology 43 (3): 239–257.  https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2015.43.3.239 Google Scholar

    55.

    Kõljalg, U., Larsson, K.-H., Abarenkov, K., Nilsson, R. H., Alexander, I. J., Eberhardt, U., Erland, S., Høiland, K., Kjøller, R., Larsson, E., Pennanen, T., Sen, R., Taylor, A. F., Tedersoo, L., Vralstad, T. & Ursing, B. M. (2005): UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. – New Phytologist 166: 1063–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01376.x Google Scholar

    56.

    Kõljalg, U., Nilsson, R. H., Abarenkov, K., Tedersoo, L., Taylor, A. F. S., Bahram, M., Bates, S. T., Bruns, T. D., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Callaghan, T. M., Douglas, B., Drenkhan, T., Eberhardt, U., Dueñas, M., Grebenc, T., Griffith, G. W., Hartmann, M., Kirk, P. M., Kohout, P., Larsson, E., Lindahl, B. D., Lücking, R., Martín, M. P., Matheny, P. B., Nguyen, N. H., Niskanen, T., Oja, J., Peay, K. G., Peintner, U., Peterson, M., Põldmaa, K., Saag, L., Saar, I., Schüssler, A., Scott, J. A., Senés, C., Smith, M. E., Suija, A., Taylor, D. L., Telleria, M. T., Weiss, M. & Larsson, K.-H. (2013): Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of Fungi. – Molecular Ecology 22 (21): 5271–5277.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12481 Google Scholar

    57.

    Kropp, B. R., Matheny, P. B. & Nanagyulyan, S. G. (2010): Phylogenetic taxonomy of the Inocybe splendens group and evolution of supersection “Marginatae”. – Mycologia 102 (3): 560–573.  https://doi.org/10.3852/08-032 Google Scholar

    58.

    Kühner, R. (1955): Compléments à la “Flore Analytique” V. Inocybes léiosporés cystidiés. Espèces nouvelles ou critiques. – Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes d'Oyonnax pour l'Étude et la Diffusion des Sciences Naturelles dans la Région 9: 3–95. Google Scholar

    59.

    Kummer, P. (1871): Der Führer in die Pilzkunde, 146 pp.; Zerbst (Luppe's Buchhandlung). Google Scholar

    60.

    Kuyper, T. W. (1985): Studies in Inocybe I. Revision of the new taxa of Inocybe described by Velenovský. – Persoonia 12 (4): 375–400. Google Scholar

    61.

    Kuyper, T. W. (1986): A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe. I. Subgenus Inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe. – Persoonia, Suppl. 3: 1–247. Google Scholar

    62.

    Lange, J. E. (1917): Studies in the Agarics of Denmark. III. Pluteus, Collybia, Inocybe. – Dansk Botanist Arkiv 2 (7): 1–50. Google Scholar

    63.

    Lange, J. E. (1940): Flora Agaricina Danica. Volume 5, 106 + vi pp.; Copenhagen (Recato A/S). Google Scholar

    64.

    Lantieri, A. (2005): Funghi interessanti o rari dei litorali sabbiosi della Sicilia sud-orientale, 3. contributo. – Bollettino del Gruppo Micologico G. Bresadola – Nuova Serie 41 (1) (2004): 37–46. Google Scholar

    65.

    La Rosa, A., Bizio, E., Saitta, A. & Tedersoo, L. (2017): Inocybe castaneicolor (Agaricales, Basidiomycota), a new species in section Splendentes. – Phytotaxa 316 (1): 79–87.  https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.316.1.8 Google Scholar

    66.

    Larsson, E., Vauras, J. & Cripps, C. L. (2014): Inocybe leiocephala, a species with an intercontinental distribution range – disentangling the I. leiocephalasubbrunneacatalaunica morphological species complex. – Karstenia 54 (1): 15–39.  https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.2014.461 Google Scholar

    67.

    Larsson, E., Vauras, J. & Cripps, C. L. (2018a): Inocybe lemmi, a new species of section Marginatae from the alpine region of Sweden. – Karstenia 57 (1–2) (2017): 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.2017.478 Google Scholar

    68.

    Larsson, E., Vauras, J. & Cripps, C. L. (2018b): Inocybe prae-tervisa group – a clade of four closely related species with partly different geographical distribution ranges in Europe. – Mycoscience 59 (4): 277–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2017.11.002 Google Scholar

    69.

    Latha, K. P. D., Manimohan, P. & Matheny, P. B. (2016): A new species of Inocybe representing the Nothocybe lineage. – Phytotaxa 267 (1): 40–50.  https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.267.1.4 Google Scholar

    70.

    Lücking, R., Aime, M., Robbertse, B. Miller, A., Ariyawansa, H., Aoki, T., Cardinali, G., Crous, P., Druzhinina, I., Geiser, D., Hawksworth, D., Hyde, K., Irinyi, L., Jeewon, R., Johnston, P., Kirk, P., Malosso, E., May, T., Meyer, W., Öpik, M., Robert, V., Stadler, M., Thines, M., Vu, D., Yurkov, A. M., Zhang, N. & Schoch, C. (2020): Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding? – IMA Fungus 11: 14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-020-00033-z Google Scholar

    71.

    Ludwig, E. (2017): Pilzkompendium. Volume 4 (parts 1 & 2), 371 pp.; Berlin (Fungicon). Google Scholar

    72.

    Marchetti, M., Consiglio, G. & Brugaletta, E. (2021): Inocybe mediterranea, una nuova specie trovata nella Pineta di Salinella (Sicilia) e osservazioni sui rapporti fra I. lapidicola e I. deianae. – Rivista di Micologia 64: 195–220. Google Scholar

    73.

    Marchetti, M., Franchi, P. & Consiglio, G. (2014): Tipificazione di alcune Inocybe di Britzelmayr. – Rivista di Micologia 57: 127–178. Google Scholar

    74.

    Matheny, P. B., Aime, M. C., Bougher, N. L., Buyck, B., Desjardin, D. E., Horak, E., Kropp, B. R., Lodge, D. J., Soytong, K., Trappe, J. M. & Hibbett, D. S. (2009): Out of the Palaeotropics? Historical biogeography and diversification of the cosmopolitan ectomycorrhizal mushroom family Inocybaceae. – Journal of Biogeography 36 (4): 577–592.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02055.x Google Scholar

    75.

    Matheny, P. B. & Bougher, N. L. (2017): Fungi of Australia, Inocybaceae, 582 pp.; Canberra & Melbourne (ABRS & CSIRO Publishing). Google Scholar

    76.

    Matheny, P. B., Hobbs, A. M. & Esteve-Raventós, F. (2020): Genera of Inocybaceae: new skin for the old ceremony. – Mycologia 112 (1) (2019): 83–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2019.1668906 Google Scholar

    77.

    Matheny, P. B. & Kudzma, L. V. (2019): New species of Inocybe (Inocybaceae) from eastern North America 1. – The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 146 (3): 213–235.  https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-18-00060.1 Google Scholar

    78.

    Matheny, P. B. & Swenie, R. A. (2018): The Inocybe geophylla group in North America: a revision of the lilac species surrounding I. lilacina. – Mycologia 110 (3): 618–634.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1469880 Google Scholar

    79.

    Mešić, A., Haelewaters, D., Tkalčec, Z., Liu, J., Kušan, I., Aime, M. C. & Pošta, A. (2021): Inocybe brijunica sp. nov., a new ectomycorrhizal fungus from Mediterranean Croatia revealed by morphology and multilocus phylogenetic analysis. – Journal of Fungi 7: 199.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030199 Google Scholar

    80.

    Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010): Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. – In: Xavier, J. (ed.): Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). Proceedings of a meeting held 14 Nov 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp. 1–8; Piscataway, New Jersey, USA (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers [IEEE]).  https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 Google Scholar

    81.

    Minh, B. Q., Nguyen, M. A. T. & Haeseler, A. Von (2013): Ultra-fast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. – Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 1188–1195.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst024 Google Scholar

    82.

    Munsell, O. (2009): Soil Color Charts. Grand Rapids, Michigan (X-Rite). Google Scholar

    83.

    Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., Haeseler, A. Von & Minh, B. (2015): IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. – Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300 Google Scholar

    84.

    Osmundson, T. W., Robert, V. A., Schoch, C. L., Baker, L. J., Smith, A., Robich, G., Mizzan, L. & Garbelotto, M. M. (2013): Filling gaps in biodiversity knowledge for macro-fungi: contributions and assessment of an herbarium collection DNA barcode sequencing project. –PLoS ONE 8 (4): e62419.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062419 Google Scholar

    85.

    Peck, C. H. (1904): Report of the State Botanist 1903. – Bulletin of the New York State Museum 75: 1–68. Google Scholar

    86.

    Poirier, J. (2002): Notes sur le genre Inocybe – 1. – Documents Mycologiques 31 (124): 3–13. Google Scholar

    87.

    Poirier, J. (2016): Études dans le genre Inocybe – 3. – Bulletin Mycologique et Botanique Dauphiné-Savoie 223: 53–63. Google Scholar

    88.

    Pošta, A., Bandini, D., Mešic, A., Pole, L., Kušan, I., Matočec, N., Malev, O. & Tkalec, Z. (2023): Inocybe istriaca sp. nov. from Brijuni National Park (Croatia) and its position within Inocybaceae revealed by multigene phylogenetic analysis. – Diversity 15: 755.  https://doi.org/10.3390/d15060755 Google Scholar

    89.

    Rambaut, A. (2006–2018): FigTree. Tree figure drawing tool version 14.4, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/(accessed 20 March 2019). Google Scholar

    90.

    Reumaux, P. (1986): Notes sur quatres Inocybes d'allure insignifiante - 1ère partie. – Bulletin Trimestriel Féderation Mycologique Dauphiné-Savoie 25 (100): 13–17. Google Scholar

    91.

    Ricken, A. (1910–1915): Die Blätterpilze (Agaricaceae) Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Länder, besonders Österreichs und der Schweiz. 2 volumes, 480 pp.; Leipzig (Weigel). Google Scholar

    92.

    Rodríguez-Campo, F. J., Bandini, D. & Olariaga, I. (2023): Inocybe hamadryadis (Inocybaceae, Agaricales), a new smooth-spored species from Europe and West Asia. – Phytotaxa 594 (3): 191–203.  https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.594.3.3-203 Google Scholar

    93.

    Rog, I., Rosenstock, N. P., Korner, C. & Klein, T. (2020): Share the wealth: trees with greater ectomycorrhizal species overlap share more carbon. – Molecular Ecology 29 (13): 2321–2333.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15351 Google Scholar

    94.

    Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Teslenko, M. (2020): MrBayes version 3.2 Manual: tutorials and model summaries. Draft version, July 2020. Available from: http://nbisweden.github.io/MrBayes/manual.html(accessed 12 Dec 2023). Google Scholar

    95.

    Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., Van Der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Sucharard, M. A. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2012): MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. – Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029 Google Scholar

    96.

    Ryberg, M., Larsson, E. & Jacobsson, S. (2010): An evolutionary perspective on morphological and ecological characters in the mushroom forming family Inocybaceae (Agaricomycotina, Fungi). – Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55: 431–442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.02.011 Google Scholar

    97.

    Ryberg, M., Nilsson, R. H., Kristiansson, E., Töpel, M., Jacobs-Son, S. & Larsson, E. (2008): Mining metadata from unidentified ITS sequences in GenBank, a case study in Inocybe (Basidiomycota). – BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 50.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-50 Google Scholar

    98.

    Siquier, J. L., Salom, J. C. & Esteve- Raventós, F. (2019): Un caso de albinismo en Inocybe rufuloides Bon. – Revista Catalana de Micologia 40: 67–70. Google Scholar

    99.

    Stangl, J. (1974): Über einige Rißpilze Südbayerns II. – Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 39 (3–4): 191–202. Google Scholar

    100.

    Stangl, J. (1989): Die Gattung Inocybe in Bayern. – Hoppea 46: 5–388. Google Scholar

    101.

    Stangl, J. & Glowinski, H. (1981): Zwei neue Arten der Gattung Inocybe aus dem Ostsee-Raum. – Karstenia 21 (1): 26–30.  https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.1981.200 Google Scholar

    102.

    Stangl, J. & Kuyper, T. W. (1985): Neue und seltene Rißpilz-Arten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. – Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 51 (2): 257–267. Google Scholar

    103.

    Stangl, J. & Veselský, J. (1979): Inocybe metrodii sp. nov. Beiträge zur Kenntnis seltenerer Inocyben 16. – Česká Mykologie 33 (4): 220–224. Google Scholar

    104.

    Tedersoo, L., Mikryukov, V., Zizka, A., Bahram, M., Haghdoust, N., Anslan, S., Prylutskyi, O., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F. T., Pärn, J., Öpik, M., Moora, M., Zobel, M., Espenberg, M., Mander, Ü., Khalid, A. N., Corrales, A., Agan, A., Vasco-Palacios, A.-M., Saitta, A., Rinaldi, A. C., Verbeken, A., Sulistyo1, B. P., Tamgnoue, B., Furneaux, B., Duarte Ritter, C., Nyamukondiwa, C., Sharp, C., Marín, C., Gohar, D., Klavina, D., Sharmah, D., Qin Dai, D., Nouhra, E., Biersma, E. M., Rähn, E., Cameron, E. K., De Crop, E., Otsing, E., Davydov, E. A., Albornoz, F. E., Brearley, F. Q., Buegger, F., Zahn, G., Bonito, G., Hiiesalu, I., Barrio, I. C., Heilmann-Clausen, J., Ankuda, J., Kupagme, J. Y., Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Djeugap Fovo, J., Geml, J., Alatalo, J. M., Alvarez-Manjarrez, J., Põldmaa, K., Runnel, K., Adamson, K., Bråthen, K. A., Pritsch, K., Tchan, K. I., Armolaitis, K., Hyde, K. D., Newsham, K. K., Panksep, K., Lateef, A. A., Tiirmann, L., Hansson, L., Lamit, J. L., Saba, M., Tuomi, M., Gryzenhout, M., Bauters, M., Piepenbring, M., Wijayawardene, N., Yorou, N. S., Kurina, O., Mortimer, P. E., Meidl, P., Kohout, P., Nilsson, R. H., Puusepp, R., Drenkhan, R., Garibay-Orijel, R., Godoy, R., Alkahtani, S., Rahimlou, S., Dudov, S. V., Põlme, S., Ghosh, S., Mundra, S., Ahmed, T., Netherway, T., Henkel, T. W., Roslin, T., Nteziryayo, V., Fedosov, V. E., Onipchenko, V. G., Yasanthika, W. A. E., Woon Lim, Y., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Antonelli, A., Kõljalg, U. & Abarenkov, K. (2022): Global patterns in endemicity and vulnerability of soil fungi. – Global Change Biology 28: i–ii, 6483–6834.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16398  Google Scholar

    105.

    Trifinopoulos, J., Nguyen, L.-T., Haeseler, A. Von & Minh, B. Q. (2016): W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. – Nucleic Acids Research 44 (W1): W232–W235.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256 Google Scholar

    106.

    Turland, N. J., Wiersema, J. H., Barrie, F. R., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Kusber, W.-H., Li, D.-Z., Marhold, K., May, T. W., Mcneill, J., Monro, A. M., Prado, J., Price, M. J. & Smith, G. F. (eds.) (2018): International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159, 254 pp.; Glashütten (Koeltz Botanical Books).  https://doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018 Google Scholar

    107.

    Vauras, J. & Larsson, E. (2016): Inocybe baltica and I. suecica, two new smooth-spored species from NW Europe. – Karstenia 56 (1–2): 13–26.  https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.2016.472 Google Scholar

    108.

    Vauras, J. & Larsson, E. (2020): First records of Inocybe melle-iconica and I. pararubens for Northern Europe with a new variety from the alpine zone of the Scandinavian mountains. – Karstenia 58 (1): 29–40.  https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.2020.487 Google Scholar

    109.

    Velenovský, J. (1920–1922): České Houby. Díl 1–5, 950 pp.; Prague ( České Botanické Společnosti). Google Scholar

    110.

    Vellinga, E. C. (1988): Glossary. – In: Bas, C., Kuyper, T. W., Noordeloos, M. E., Vellinga, E. C. (eds.): Flora Agaricina Neerlandica. Volume 1; Rotterdam (A. A. Balkema). Google Scholar

    111.

    Větrovský, T., Kohout, P., Kopecký, M., Machac, A., Man, M., Bahnmann, B. D., Brabcová, V., Choi, J., Meszárošová, L., Human, Z. R., Lepinay, C., Lladó, S., López-Mondéjar, R., Martinović, T., Mašínová, T., Morais, D., Navrátilová, D., Odriozola, I., Štursová, M., Švec, K., Tláskal, V., Urbanová, M., Wan, J., Žifčáková, L., Howe, A., Ladau, J., Peay, K. G., Storch, D., Wild, J. & Baldrian, P. (2019): A meta-analysis of global fungal distribution reveals climate-driven patterns. – Nature Communications 10: 5142.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13164-8 Google Scholar

    Appendices

    Appendix 1.

    Sequences used in this study. Herbarium abbreviations follow Index Herbariorum ( http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/), with the exception of D.B. = private herbarium of Ditte Bandini. Accession numbers in bold print were obtained in the context of this study. EcM – ectomycorrhizae.

    img-z32-2_01.gif

    Continued

    img-z33-1_01.gif

    Continued

    img-z34-1_01.gif

    Continued

    img-z35-1_01.gif

    Continued

    img-z36-1_01.gif

    Continued

    img-z37-1_01.gif
    Ditte Bandini, Giovanni Bandini, Konstanze Bensch, Francisco J. Rodríguez Campo, Bernd Oertel, François Valade, and Ursula Eberhardt "Three new smooth-spored species of Inocybe, two new epitypes, and updates on earlier epitypifications," Integrative Systematics: Stuttgart Contributions to Natural History 6(2), 1-37, (30 December 2023). https://doi.org/10.18476/2023.787646
    Received: 8 July 2023; Accepted: 28 October 2023; Published: 30 December 2023
    KEYWORDS
    Agaricales
    Alpha taxonomy
    epitype
    Inocybaceae
    molecular systematics
    nrITS
    nrLSU
    Back to Top