BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 1982 SARCOCYSTIS OF DEER IN SOUTH DAKOTA
CHARLES W. EMNETT, ERNEST J. HUGGHINS
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The prevalence of Sarcocystis in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (O. hemionus) in South Dakota was determined through microscopic examination of tongue samples. The percentage of Sarcocystis infection for both species of deer was determined for prairies east of the Missouri River, west of the Missouri River, and the Black Hills of western South Dakota. Sixteen percent (N=62) of the white-tailed deer tongues from East River, 69% (N=42) from West River, and 74% (N=23) from the Black Hills were infected. Prevalence for mule deer was 88% (N=24), 78% (N=63), and 75% (N=12) from East River, West River, and the Black Hills, respectively. Of 50 tongue samples obtained from both species of deer during a special antlerless deer hunt in the Black Hills in 1978, 66% were infected. Coyotes (Canis latrans), dogs (Canis familiaris), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), a gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), bobcat (Felis rufus), and raccoon (Procyon lotor) were fed muscle from white-tailed deer and mule deer naturally infected with Sarcocystis to determine their role as definitive hosts. All coyotes, dogs, and the gray fox shed sporocysts, while none were recovered from the other animals. Sporocysts shed by coyotes were counted and concentrated into an inoculum and administered to a white-tailed deer fawn, which was necropsied 85 days after inoculation. Sections of heart, tongue, esophagus, diaphragm, and skeletal muscle were found to be heavily infected with sarcocysts, while sarcocysts were not detected in a control fawn.

EMNETT and HUGGHINS: SARCOCYSTIS OF DEER IN SOUTH DAKOTA 1
CHARLES W. EMNETT and ERNEST J. HUGGHINS "SARCOCYSTIS OF DEER IN SOUTH DAKOTA ," Journal of Wildlife Diseases 18(2), 187-193, (1 April 1982). https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-18.2.187
Received: 7 July 1981; Published: 1 April 1982
Back to Top