Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2005 Boa constrictor Predation on a Titi monkey, Callicebus discolor
Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia, Andrés León-Reyes, Sylvia Seger
Author Affiliations +

Although it is thought that predation has played a major role in the evolution of primate sociality, actual predation events involving primates are rarely documented (Van Schaik, 1983; Boinski et al., 2000). Birds of prey, felids, mustelids, and snakes are known predators of Neotropical primates. Most reported attacks by Neotropical snakes on monkeys are attributed to Boa constrictor, which feeds on callitrichids (Saguinus) and cebids (Saimiri, Cebus, Alouatta and Chiropotes), as well as a wide variety of smalland medium-sized mammals (didelphids, dasypodids, vespertilionids, molossids, procyonids, agoutids, dasyproctids, echimyids, murids and sciurids), birds (falconids, cotingids and formicarids), and reptiles (teiids) (Janzen, 1970; Greene, 1983; Chapman, 1986; Trail, 1987; Henderson et al., 1995; Martins and Oliveira, 1998; Thorstrom and Morales, 2000; Shahuano Tello et al., 2002; Perry et al., 2003; Urbani, 2003; Ferrari et al., 2004; pers. obs.).

Here we report an instance of predation by Boa constrictor on Callicebus discolor, observed during fieldwork at the Tiputini Biodiversity Station (TBS), a field station located in the Ecuadorian Amazon (00°37′05″S, 76°10′19″W, elev. 215 m; see Cisneros-Heredia, 2003). A total of 12 primate species have been recorded at TBS: Cebuella pygmaea, Saguinus tripartitus, Aotus vociferans, Callicebus discolor, Pithecia monachus, Pithecia aequatorialis, Saimiri sciureus, Cebus albifrons, Cebus apella, Alouatta seniculus, Lagothrix lagotricha and Ateles belzebuth. This is the first report of boa predation on monkeys of the genus Callicebus.

On 28 September 2003, at 11:30 am, we heard the calls of at least two Callicebus discolor. Following the calls, we discovered an adult Boa constrictor (total length ca. four meters) constricting a Callicebus discolor in a tree, approximately five meters above ground. The boa was coiled around the monkey, still shifting and squeezing. A second monkey was about four meters from the boa at the same height and called out once. No physical interactions were observed between the second monkey and the boa. The boa remained coiled around the carcass for some 45 minutes and then took approximately one hour to swallow it.

Reducing the risk of predation has been hypothesized to be one of the benefits of group living, and group behaviours such as alarm calls, mobbing and counter-attacks have been reported as primate responses to predation attempts by snakes (Chapman, 1986; Bartecki and Heymann, 1987; Shahuano Tello et al., 2002). During this predation event, the only response behaviour we recorded was the calling from the second individual (rather short, classified into the second group of Robinson, 1979). The absence of other response behaviours cannot be assumed, however, because we arrived when the boa was already constricting the monkey. It is unknown how predation events may have functioned in the evolution of sociality in Callicebus, but this observation, together with similar reports (Chapman, 1986; Bartecki and Heymann, 1987; Martins and Oliveira, 1998; Shahuano Tello et al., 2002; Perry et al., 2003; Ferrari et al., 2004), suggests that snakes play a major role as predators of Neotropical primates.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Eckhard W. Heymann, Stella de la Torre and Kelly Swing for their critical reading of the manuscript. Susan Perry, Eckhard W. Heymann and Stella de la Torre provided relevant literature. Maria Elena Heredia, Laura Heredia and Hector León provided financial and moral support. Tiputini Biodiversity Station / Universidad San Francisco de Quito provided institutional and logistical support. Video files of this event are deposited in the archives of the Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Universidad San Francisco de Quito. This is a publication of the project “Study of the Herpetofauna of the Tiputini Biodiversity Station” (D. F. Cisneros-Heredia, investigator).

References

1.

U. Bartecki and E. W. Heymann . 1987. Field observation of snake-mobbing in a group of saddle-back tamarins, Saguinus fuscicollis nigrifrons. Folia Primatol 48:199–202. Google Scholar

2.

S. Boinski, A. Treves, and C. A. Chapman . 2000. A critical evaluation of the influence of predators on primates: Effects on group travel. In On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. S. Boinski and P. A. Garber , editors. (eds.). pp. 43–72.The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Google Scholar

3.

C. A. Chapman 1986. Boa constrictor predation and group response in white-faced Cebus monkeys. Biotropica 18:2171–172. Google Scholar

4.

D. F. Cisneros-Heredia 2003. Herpetofauna de la Estación de Biodiversidad Tiputini, Amazonía Ecuatoriana: Ecología de una comunidad taxonómicamente diversa con comentarios sobre metodologías de inventario. In Ecología y Ambiente en el Ecuador: Memorias I Congreso de Ecología y Ambiente. S. de la Torre and G. Reck , editors. (eds.). pp. 1–21.Universidad San Francisco de Quito. Ecuador. Google Scholar

5.

S. F. Ferrari, W. L A. Pereira, R. R. Santos, and L. M. Veiga . 2004. Fatal attack of a Boa constrictor on a bearded saki (Chiropotes satanas utahicki). Folia Primatol 75:111–113. Google Scholar

6.

H. W. Greene 1983. Boa constrictor (boa, bequer, boa constrictor). In Costa Rican Natural History. D. H. Janzen , editor. (ed.). pp. 380–382.The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Google Scholar

7.

R. W. Henderson, T. W P. Micucci, G. Puorto, and R. W. Bourgeois . 1995. Ecological correlates and patterns in the distribution of Neotropical boines (Serpentes, Boidae): A preliminary assessment. Herpetological Natural History 3:15–27. Google Scholar

8.

D. H. Janzen 1970. Altruism by coatis in the face of predation by Boa constrictor. J. Mammal 51:387–389. Google Scholar

9.

M. Martins and M. E. Oliveira . 1998. Natural history of snakes in forests of the Manaus Region, Central Amazonia, Brazil. Herpetological Natural History 6:278–150. Google Scholar

10.

S. Perry, J. H. Manson, G. Dower, and E. Wikberg . 2003. White-faced capuchins cooperate to rescue a groupmate from a Boa constrictor. Folia Primatol 74:109–111. Google Scholar

11.

J. G. Robinson 1979. Vocal regulation of use of space by groups of titi monkeys Callicebus moloch. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 5:1–15. Google Scholar

12.

N. S. Shahuano Tello, M. Huck, and E. W. Heymann . 2002. Boa constrictor attack and successful group defence in moustached tamarins, Saguinus mystax. Folia Primatol 73:146–148. Google Scholar

13.

R. Thorstrom, J. D. Ramos, and C. M. Morales . 2000. Breeding biology of barred forest-falcons in northeastern Guatemala. Auk 117:781–786. Google Scholar

14.

P. W. Trail 1987. Predation and antipredator behavior at Guianan Cock-of-the-Rock leks. Auk 104:496–507. Google Scholar

15.

B. Urbani 2003. Utilización del estrato vertical por el mono aullador de manto (Alouatta palliata, Primates) en Isla Colón, Panamá. Antropo 4:29–33. Google Scholar

16.

C. P. Van Schaik 1983. Why are diurnal primates living in groups. Behaviour 88:120–143. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia, College of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador

[2] Andrés León-Reyes, Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador

[3] Sylvia Seger, School for International Training, Hernando de la Cruz N31-37, Quito, Ecuador.

Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia, Andrés León-Reyes, and Sylvia Seger "Boa constrictor Predation on a Titi monkey, Callicebus discolor," Neotropical Primates 13(3), 11-12, (1 December 2005). https://doi.org/10.1896/1413-4705.13.3.11
Published: 1 December 2005
Back to Top