Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2007 Extragroup Copulations Among Brown Howler Monkeys in Southern Brazil
Marcos de Souza Fialho, Eleonore Z. F. Setz
Author Affiliations +

Introduction

Like most other howler monkeys, brown howlers (Alouatta guariba) form one-male groups with up to 10 individuals. Even if there is more than one adult male, the alpha male howler monkey usually monopolizes all reproductive females and sires all young (Pope, 1990). However, extragroup copulations (EGCs) have been observed in Alouatta pigra (Horwich, 1983) and A. seniculus (Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000). Here we report the first EGCs observed in A. guariba clamitans.

Methods

We studied brown howler troops in hillside forest in Porto Alegre (30°12′S, 51°04′W), Brazil, during the summer (Nov 1998 – Jan 1999, 483 obs. hours) and winter (Jun – Aug 1999, 386 obs. hours; Fialho and Setz, 2000). Study group GA was comprised of three adult males, three adult females, and four immatures. An adult male had emigrated from this group in October 1999 (MMA Jardim, pers. comm.). A neighboring group (GB) had five individuals. The GB alpha male was larger and had a more intense reddish coloration than any GA adult male.

Results

Daily inter-group encounters between the study groups were accompanied by extended vocalizations, but they were usually peaceful. However, an aggressive encounter between GA and GB occurred on June 12. During this encounter, the GA group chased and bit individuals from GB, and one GB individual fled to the ground. Only the GB alpha male was not attacked. Shortly after this aggressive encounter, the GB alpha male copulated with a GA female, just a few meters away from other GA group members. The observing males of GA group did not react. On June 13, the same two individuals performed two more EGCs. In the morning, the male inspected the female's genitalia twice and copulated with her; an hour and a half later, the large GB male was feeding in a Ficus tree where GA group was resting. The GB male approached their group more closely, and GA group members became agitated. The GB alpha male vocalized within a few meters of the group, and the female left her group and followed him for about 50 meters. The female produced nasal sounds (“Hummm, hummm”), while flicking her tongue rhythmically in and out of her mouth. The male approached and mounted her.

On the days that the EGCs were observed (June 12 and 13) no within-group copulations were observed for the GA group. We did not follow the group on June 14 and 15. Early on June 16, the GB alpha male visited GA's home range again; he approached, vocalized and left, followed by the same female as above. Simultaneously, another female disappeared from GA, but minutes later the two females reappeared in the group. Later on the same day we saw three copulations involving a resident GA male and the female that had copulated with the GB male. This was the first within-group sexual activity we had observed in GA. A group GA female carrying an infant observed the copulations but did not react. In summary, all EGC copulations occurred in the mornings, and each one lasted a minute or less. About five minutes after each EGC, the GB male chased the female for several meters. All EGCs involved the same pair and occurred at the periphery of GA's area, where home ranges overlapped. The GB male did not follow the GA group when it moved away from the edge of its range after these encounters.

Discussion

Extragroup copulations have been described both in Old (Smuts, 1987) and New World monkeys (Digby, 1999), and in monogamous (Mason, 1966; Palombit, 1994; Reichard, 1995) as well as polygynous species, including Alouatta spp. (Horwich, 1983; Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000). The behavioral repertoire of A. pigra during EGCs (Horwich, 1983) is more diverse than in A. guariba. However, the male vocalization in our study has not been described for either A. pigra or A. seniculus. In general, EGCs are similar across Alouatta species. For example, after male solicitation, the female moves towards the male (Horwich, 1983), and rhythmic tongue flicks precede copulations (Horwich, 1983; Mendes, 1989; Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000). Genital inspection was observed in both A. seniculus (Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000) and in A. guariba (this study). Extra-group copulations last about one minute across Alouatta species (Horwich, 1983; Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000; this study). After copulation the male chases the female (Horwich, 1983) and no agonistic behaviors are directed at the female by her group mates (Horwich, 1983; Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000). In 44% of observed EGCs in A. seniculus, one or more resident males had visual contact with the mating pair but did not react (Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000); group members also appeared indifferent to EGCs in this study.

EGCs may be rare in Alouatta compared to other primates. In the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus, for example, EGCs occur frequently during group encounters, and males act aggressively and chase females after copulations (Digby, 1999). Among primates, females are responsible for most copulation solicitations (Smuts, 1987). In all A. seniculus EGCs, it was the female who took the lead (Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000). In A. guariba females also initiated EGCs. The few data available suggest that females are more prone to EGCs in multi-male groups (Horwich, 1983; Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000; Kowalewski et al., 2006).

Observations of EGCs in Alouatta are consistent with two hypotheses proposed by Smuts (1987) to explain female mate choice: (a) the search for genetically superior males and (b) the preference for non-familiar males (see also Agoramoorthy and Rudran, 1993). The first hypothesis is supported by observations on A. guariba (this study) and A. seniculus (Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000) in which males involved in EGCs were noticeably larger than those belonging to the female's group. Agoramoorthy and Hsu (2000) suggested that by copulating with neighboring males a female could reduce the likelihood of infanticide if her group was taken over by a new male. Six out of seven A. seniculus females involved in EGCs had previously lost infants through infanticide (Agoramoorthy and Hsu, 2000). EGCs could also be a prelude to female dispersal to the neighboring group. However, in our group, this had not occurred by January 2000, when both GA females gave birth in GA (MMA Jardim, pers. comm.). The small number of EGCs observed in howler monkeys does not yet allow us to falsify any of these competing hypotheses.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Urban Monkey Project (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul and Secretaria Municipal do Meio Ambiente de Porto Alegre), FAPESP grant 98/03018-6, and Júlio C. Bicca-Marques and Woody Benson for comments on the manuscript. Denise Brutto permitted us to do research in her area.

References

1.

G. Agoramoorthy and M. J. Hsu 2000. Extragroup copulation among wild red howler monkeys in Venezuela. Folia Primatol. 71: 147–151. Google Scholar

2.

G. Agoramoorthy and R. Rudran 1993. Male dispersal among free-ranging red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in Venezuela. Folia Primatol. 61: 92–96. Google Scholar

3.

L. J. Digby 1999. Sexual behavior and extragroup copulations in a wild population of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatol. 70: 136–145. Google Scholar

4.

M. S. Fialho and E. Z. F. Setz 2000. Brown howler (Alouatta fusca) feeding ecology in hillside and coastal forests in southern Brazil. Am. J. Primatol. 51: 56–57. Google Scholar

5.

R. H. Horwich 1983. Breeding behaviors in the black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) of Belize. Primates 24: 222–230. Google Scholar

6.

W. A. Mason 1996. Social organization of the South American monkey, Callicebus moloch: A preliminary report. Tulane Studies in Zoology 13: 23–28. Google Scholar

7.

S. L. Mendes 1989. Estudo ecológico de Alouatta fusca (Primates: Cebidae) na Estação Biológica de Caratinga, MG. Revista Nordestina de Biologia 6: 71–104. Google Scholar

8.

R. A. Palombit 1994. Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous ape. Animal Behaviour 47: 721–723. Google Scholar

9.

T. R. Pope 1990. The reproductive consequences of male cooperation in the red howler monkey: Paternity exclusion in multi-male and single-male troops using genetic markers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 439–446. Google Scholar

10.

U. Reichard 1995. Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous gibbon (Hylobates lar). Ethology 100: 99–112. Google Scholar

11.

B. B. Smuts 1987. Sexual competition and mate choice. In: Primate Societies , B. B. Smuts , D. L. Cheney , R. M. Seyfarth , R. W. Wrangham and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), pp.385–399. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Marcos de S. Fialho, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Bairro Barão Geraldo, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, 13083-970; e-mail: <marcos.fialho@ibama.gov.br>, and Eleonore Z. F. Setz, Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, e-mail: <setz@unicamp.br>.

Marcos de Souza Fialho and Eleonore Z. F. Setz "Extragroup Copulations Among Brown Howler Monkeys in Southern Brazil," Neotropical Primates 14(1), 28-30, (1 January 2007). https://doi.org/10.1896/044.014.0106
Published: 1 January 2007
Back to Top