BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 14 May 2025 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
3 February 2025 Diverse, Native-Plant Communities as Important Nesting Habitat for Chestnut-Bellied Scaled Quail
Fidel Hernández, Richard H. Sinclair, Holley N. Kline, Eric D. Grahmann, Timothy E. Fulbright, David B. Wester, Jeremy Baumgardt, Michael Hehman
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Habitat loss and fragmentation have been implicated in the decline of chestnut-bellied scaled quail (Callipepla squamata castanogastris) in southern Texas, U.S.A. Although a general affinity of the subspecies for native thornscrub is known, its specific habitat requirements are less studied, and no information exists regarding its demography. We conducted a study in southern Texas (n = 5 ranches; LaSalle and McMullen counties) to 1) quantify survival, reproduction, and occupancy of chestnut-bellied scaled quail and 2) characterize its nesting habitat to help inform future rangeland management. We captured and radio-collared individuals (n = 137) during Mar–Aug 2013 and 2014 to estimate survival and reproduction and conducted call-count surveys (n = 60 points) during May–August of both years to estimate occupancy and detection probability. We measured vegetation characteristics at nest sites (n = 53 nests) and paired random points to document habitat use. We documented seasonal survival (0.68–0.85), clutch size (10–11 eggs), and apparent nest success (38–59%) that were within values reported for scaled quail in other portions of its geographic distribution. However, relative abundance was low (0.14–0.25 calling males/point), as was occupancy (0.56–0.73) and probability of detection (0.10–0.32). Regarding nesting habitat, pricklypear (Opuntia engelmannii Salm-Dyck ex Engelm.) was the most common nesting substrate (68%; n = 53 nests), with pricklypear (95% CI β = 0.992–1.105; P < 0.09), woody plants (95% CI β = 1.001–1.042; P < 0.04), and native grasses (95% CI β = 0.993–1.129; P < 0.08) being important variables distinguishing nests from random sites. Nest survival was negatively influenced by non-native grass cover (95% CI β = -0.115 to -0.006). Preservation of diverse shrub and native-grass communities should receive high consideration when planning brush management in southern Texas if conservation of chestnut-bellied scaled quail is a goal.

Fidel Hernández, Richard H. Sinclair, Holley N. Kline, Eric D. Grahmann, Timothy E. Fulbright, David B. Wester, Jeremy Baumgardt, and Michael Hehman "Diverse, Native-Plant Communities as Important Nesting Habitat for Chestnut-Bellied Scaled Quail," Rangeland Ecology and Management 98(1), 184-191, (3 February 2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.09.007
Received: 28 March 2024; Accepted: 12 September 2024; Published: 3 February 2025
KEYWORDS
Brush management
invasive grass
native grass
Pricklypear
scaled quail
woody cover
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top