How to translate text using browser tools
29 December 2023 Case 3865 – Proposed conservation of the original and long-established identity of Paradisea superba J.R. Forster, 1781 (currently Lophorina superba; Aves, Paradisaeidae) by setting aside an inappropriate neotype designation
Andy Elliott, Nigel J. Collar, Murray D. Bruce, Guy M. Kirwan
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The purpose of this application, under Article 75.6 of the Code, is to conserve the current usage of the specific name superba for a species of bird-of-paradise from New Guinea by setting aside the neotype designated for Paradisea superba J.R. Forster, 1781 by Irestedt et al. in 2017 and instead deeming the later neotype designation by Elliott et al. in 2022 to be valid. The former neotype designation was not in accord with then-prevailing usage, as the taxonomic identity of Paradisea superba had remained unchallenged since its initial introduction 236 years previously.

Andy Elliott, Nigel J. Collar, Murray D. Bruce, and Guy M. Kirwan "Case 3865 – Proposed conservation of the original and long-established identity of Paradisea superba J.R. Forster, 1781 (currently Lophorina superba; Aves, Paradisaeidae) by setting aside an inappropriate neotype designation," The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 80(1), 46-52, (29 December 2023). https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v80.a013
Published: 29 December 2023
KEYWORDS
Lophorina superba
New Guinea
nomenclature
prevailing usage
Superb Bird-of-paradise
taxon identity
taxonomy
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top