Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2020 Small Protected Areas as Stepping-Stones for Jaguars in Western Mexico
Víctor H. Luja, Carlos J. Navarro, Luis Alberto Torres Covarrubias, Mauricio Cortés Hernández, Ignacio Luis Vallarta Chan
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The jaguar (Panthera onca) is one of the most endangered felids in the world. Its distribution has been reduced by 50% globally, and the species continues to be hunted illegally. We provide data on jaguar abundance, sex ratio, seasonal and daily activity, and site fidelity in La Papalota—a 368-ha natural protected area in Nayarit, western Mexico. La Papalota is located between two areas with high priority for the conservation of the jaguar: Marismas Nacionales Biosphere Reserve and the San Blas-San Juan area. Over a period of 4,240 trap nights (14 months), we collected 130 independent photos of six different individuals (one adult male, three adult females, one subadult female, and one cub). Jaguars use La Papalota all year round, and we were able to document three pregnancies. We suggest that, although a small protected area like our study site cannot provide an entire home range for even a single jaguar, it and similar reserves can play a crucial role as stepping-stones for jaguars moving across highly modified landscapes.

Introduction

The jaguar (Panthera onca) is the largest extant wildcat in the Americas, where it has lived for about one million years (Rabinowitz, 2014). Originally, this predator was widely distributed, from the arid mountains of the southwestern United States through Mexico, Central America, and South America to Argentina (Seymour, 1989). In Mexico, its modern distribution includes the Gulf of Mexico, from Tamaulipas to the Yucatan Peninsula in the Caribbean; the Pacific coast, from Sonora to Chiapas (Chávez-Tovar, Aranda, & Ceballos, 2006); and the Central Plains in the states of Morelos, Mexico, and Hidalgo (Aguilar-López, Ramos-Frías, Rojas-Martínez, & Cornejo-Latorre, 2015; Monroy-Vilchis, Sánchez, Aguilera-Reyes, Suárez, & Urios, 2008; Valenzuela-Galván, Castro-Campos, Servin, Martínez-Barona, & Martínez-Montes, 2015).

Due to habitat loss and poaching, the jaguar’s distribution in Mexico has decreased by 54% (Nowell & Jackson, 1996; Sanderson et al., 2002), with a current estimate of approximately 4,000 to 5,000 wild individuals (Chávez, Zarza, de la Torre, Medellín, & Ceballos, 2016). The species is classified as globally near threatened according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN; Caso et al., 2008), and it is listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. In Mexico, jaguars are listed as in danger of extinction and have been protected from hunting since 1987 (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, 2010). Recently, de la Torre, González-Maya, Zarza, Ceballos, and Medellín (2017) assigned the jaguar population from Sierra de Tamaulipas and Gulf of Mexico to IUCN’s critically endangered category and from the Selva Maya and Mexican Pacific to IUCN’s endangered category.

Habitat fragmentation is one of the most serious threats to the persistence of jaguar populations at the continental level (Medellín, de la Torre, Zarza, Chávez, & Ceballos, 2017). Top predators such as the jaguar may be particularly susceptible to habitat fragmentation given their low population densities, leading to small effective population sizes in local fragments (Haag et al., 2010). Connectivity between populations (the degree to which the landscape foments or limits the displacement of individuals between habitat patches) allows genetic turnover and prevents problems such as inbreeding from reducing the viability of populations (Chávez et al., 2016; Soulé & Mills, 1998; Stockwell, Hendry, & Kinnison, 2003). Corridors and stepping-stones have been proposed as landscape-level strategies to increase connectivity between fragmented and isolated populations (Baum, Haynes, Dillemuth, & Cronin, 2004). Although some studies have located potential sites that could act as corridors and stepping-stones for the jaguar (de la Torre et al., 2017; Rabinowitz & Zeller, 2010), field observations are required to confirm whether jaguars in fact use these areas.

The objective of this study is to determine whether La Papalota, a small protected area, is part of a biological corridor as a stepping-stone that contributes to connect the populations of jaguars of Marismas Nacionales Biosphere Reserve (north) with those of the San Blas-San Juan area (south). Both areas are considered high priority jaguar conservation units for the conservation of jaguar populations in Mexico (Medellín et al., 2017).

Methods

Study Area

La Papalota, the first private reserve in Mexico, is located in the municipality of Santiago Ixcuintla, Nayarit, in western Mexico (Figure 1), which is between 21.67° N and −105.45° W and 21.63° N and −105.44° W. This reserve lies on the western bank of the mouth of the Santiago River, facing the Pacific Ocean. The climate is warm and humid. The rainy season is between June and October, peaking in July and August, and rainfall varies from 1,595.1 mm to 1,266.1 mm per year. The highest temperatures occur from May to October, and the annual average temperature is 31.7℃. La Papalota has an area of 368 ha. The area includes mostly mangrove forests (Avicennia germinans and Conocarpus erectus) in the southern part of the reserve that faces the sea, as well as a mosaic of tropical deciduous and secondary forests elsewhere. The continental margins of the protected area are surrounded by agricultural lands, particularly tobacco and sorghum fields. Most importantly, La Papalota represents an island of native vegetation located 9 km (straight line) south of the Marismas Nacionales Biosphere Reserve, and the whole region acts as a corridor for jaguar populations between northern (Sinaloa and Sonora) and southern (Jalisco to Chiapas) states (Ceballos, Chávez, & Zarza, 2012).

Figure 1.

Natural protected area La Papalota, Nayarit, western Mexico. The yellow line delimits the 368-ha area of the reserve, and red dots indicate locations of camera trapping in this study.

10.1177_1940082917717051-fig1.tif

Fieldwork

The presence of jaguars in La Papalota was confirmed in 2009 when footprints were observed on the property. In July 2015, we started a biodiversity study using camera traps. All the dirt roads of the reserve were searched for jaguar tracks. Between July and December 2015, five stations were set up in sites with the highest evidence of footprints, and we began camera trapping in January 2016. Each station included two cameras, one on each side of the road, to obtain photographs of both sides of the photographed individuals (O'Connell, Nichols, & Ullas, 2010). This allowed us to individually identify four adult specimens and one cub.

In January 2016, we divided the study area into 25 quadrants that were 300 m × 300 m using Google Earth Pro®. The size of the quadrant was established to maximize the probability of obtaining jaguar records from a small site; the minimum distance between cameras was 500 m (C. Chávez, personal communication, December, 2015). Every month from January 1, 2016 to February 28, 2017, we placed camera traps in each of 10 different quadrants (eight Cuddeback® cameras and two HCO Scoutguard® cameras). The quadrants were chosen randomly each month so that all areas of the reserve were equally likely to be sampled. Cameras were set for 24 hr with standard sensitivity, and all photos that were taken captured the shooting time and date. Cameras were attached to trees 35 to 50 cm above ground and were placed perpendicular to dirt roads used by jaguars (confirmed by tracks), as described by Ceballos et al. (2012). We downloaded images and checked batteries on a monthly basis. Automatic data organization, storage and analysis of camera trap pictures were performed using the methods of Harris, Thompson, Childs, and Sanderson (2010).

Results

Our sampling efforts totaled 4,240 trap nights (424 nights × 10 cameras) during the study period, with a total yield of 279 jaguar pictures. Of those, 130 shots (46.6%) were high quality and allowed us to unequivocally identify individuals. The remaining images were excluded from analyses because individuals were not in position, blurry, or too far away (N = 36), or because they represented duplicated individual records during the same 24-hr period (N = 113). The location of each camera, sampling month, and number of jaguar pictures are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Geographic Locations of 25 Sites Where 10 Camera Traps Were Randomly Placed Every Month.

10.1177_1940082917717051-table1.tif

Number of Jaguars and Sex Ratio

In our final set of 130 photos, we could identify six individuals, namely three adult females (F01, F02, and F03; Figure 2a, b, and c, respectively), one adult male (M01; Figure 2d), one subadult female (F04; Figure 2e), and one cub (C01; Figure 2f), resulting in a 1:4 male-to-female ratio. The number of individual pictures per jaguar was F01: 41 (30.1%); M01: 37 (27.21%); F02: 36 (26.47%); F03: 10 (7.35%); F04: 7 (5.1%); and C01: 5 (3.6%).

Figure 2.

The six jaguars photographed in La Papalota between January 2016 and February 2017: adult females F01 (a), F02 (b), and F03 (c); adult male M01 (d); subadult female F04 (e); and a female cub C01 (f).

10.1177_1940082917717051-fig2.tif

Seasonal Activity

We obtained jaguar pictures in all of the 14 months of the study with a mean of 9.2 pictures per month, 95% confidence interval (CI) [6, 12.5]. The highest number of records (Figure 3) occurred in March 2016 (20 pictures), January 2017 (20 pictures), and February 2017 (17 pictures); the lowest number of records (Figure 3) occurred in September and October 2016 (3 pictures each).

Figure 3.

Monthly frequency (# of monthly pictures / # total pictures) of jaguar records captured by camera traps in La Papalota in 2016 and 2017.

10.1177_1940082917717051-fig3.tif

Daily Activity

Fifty-three (40.7%) and 77 (59.3%) photographs were obtained during the day (7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.) and at night (6:30 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.), respectively. Diel activity peaked from 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. (15 pictures, 11.5%) and from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. (12 pictures, 9.2%) and was lowest at 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 12:00 noon to 1:00 p.m. (2 photos each, Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Frequency of jaguar daily activity according to photographic records in La Papalota between January 2016 and February 2017.

10.1177_1940082917717051-fig4.tif

Frequency of Occurrence

Three of the four adult jaguars (F01, F02, and M01) were photographed between 37 and 41 times (independent records), resulting in average times to recapture of 9.5 days, 95% CI [5.5, 13.6], to 10.9, 95% CI [6.3, 15.5], over the study period. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed no significant differences (H = 0.596, N = 14, p = .742) in the average recapture times of the three most photographed jaguars.

Discussion

Current conservation actions for the jaguar have focused on establishing parks, reserves, and natural protected areas (Rabinowitz, 2014; Sanderson et al., 2002). However, to maintain the viability of populations in the medium and long term, it is necessary to ensure connectivity between them through the establishment of biological corridors (de la Torre et al., 2017; Rabinowitz & Zeller, 2010).

In this work, we confirm that at least four adult jaguars use La Papalota as a safe site and breeding area because we documented three pregnancies. With these data, we provide evidence that small reserves can act as stepping-stones (small patches linking otherwise isolated patches; Baum et al., 2004). Stepping-stones are crucial for long-distance dispersal of species such as jaguar and for its range expansion through habitat networks (Saura, Bodin, & Fortin, 2014). Thus, at a regional level, La Papalota contributes to the connectivity of two areas of importance for the conservation of the jaguar: Marismas Nacionales Biosphere Reserve and the San Blas-San Juan area.

Our study also provides data on the sex ratio, periods of activity, and reproduction of jaguars in western Mexico. Most studies of jaguars that use camera traps have reported a sex ratio biased toward males (2:1; Maffei, Noss, Silver, & Kelly, 2011). This bias differs for other large cats; females tend to outnumber males because the mortality rates of the latter are increased by intraspecific conflicts and during dispersal (Balme & Hunter, 2004; Goodrich et al., 2008; Logan & Sweanor, 2001). Nevertheless, males have larger home ranges and higher detection probabilities, and male-biased ratios seem to vanish when data are corrected for sex and encounter-rate probabilities (Tobler, Carrillo-Percastegui, Hartley, & Powell, 2013).

We found that jaguar activity increased from the hot and humid (April to November) to the cold and dry (December to March) months. This pattern agrees with previous studies carried out in areas with highly seasonal climates (Cavalcanti & Gese, 2009; Chávez-Tovar & Zarza, 2009; Núñez-Pérez, 2006). Low jaguar activity during the rainy season in La Papalota might indicate that jaguar home ranges track prey dispersal when fresh water is not a limitation.

Jaguars have been traditionally regarded as nocturnal with short bouts of daytime activity (Monroy-Vilchis, Rodríguez-Soto, Zarco-González, & Urios, 2009; Scognamillo, Maxit, Sunquist, & Farrell, 2002). However, a range of studies corroborate our finding that daytime activity is not infrequent (Maffei, Cuellar, & Noss, 2002; Núñez, Miller, & Lindzey, 2002), and nocturnal versus diurnal preferences can vary among individuals (Hoogesteijn & Mondolfi, 1992). Given that intensive hunting is often responsible for the shifting of nocturnal habits in jaguars and other large wildcats (de Almeida, 1990), we suggest that poaching pressure is relatively low in La Papalota.

With this small-scale study, data were obtained on reproductive aspects of jaguar along the Mexican Pacific coast. The subadult female (F04) was found to be the daughter of F01 and was born in the first months of 2015; cub and mother were photographed together in January, April, and July 2016, and the cub stayed in the area until the beginning of 2017 when she was recorded along with an adult male (M01). In addition, by December 2016, F01 was pregnant again and had given birth before February 2017; a 2-year period between consecutive pregnancies tallies well with published literature (Seymour, 1989). Finally, the other adult female (F02) was photographed pregnant in January 2016 and in company of her cub in December 2016.

La Papalota represents an island of primary tropical and mangrove forests bounded by the Pacific Ocean and agricultural fields. Freshwater reservoirs from the Santiago River are available to jaguars all year long, and potential prey species are diverse, including whitetail deer (Odocoileus virginianus), collared peccary (Pecari tajacu), white-nosed coati (Nasua narica), armadillo (Dasypus novencintus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), birds, reptiles, and crabs (Luja et al., unpublished data)—all of which are protected from hunting by La Papalota stakeholders. Overall, La Papalota could be a stepping-stone in a natural corridor for transient jaguars and other species transiting the large Marismas Nacionales Biosphere Reserve and the southern part of the western Sierra Madre mountain range (Navarro-Serment, López-González, & Gallo-Reynoso, 2005), through the Santiago and San Cristóbal rivers and the Matanchén Bay near San Blas (Figel, Ruíz-Gutiérrez, & Brown, 2016). Both the beach and the narrow corridors, which are host to healthy riparian vegetation, could be functioning as transit areas. To confirm this, we plan to expand the extent of our study area and complement camera trapping with telemetry studies.

Implications for Conservation

In a highly modified landscape dominated by human activities, it is urgent to identify those elements that can function as biological corridors or as stepping-stones that maintain connectivity between large populations. In this study, we found that a small patch of only 368 ha has adequate conditions for the jaguars to find shelter, food, and even reproduce. Although a small protected area like our study site cannot provide an entire home range for even a single jaguar, it and similar reserves can play a crucial role as stepping-stones for jaguars moving across highly modified landscapes.

Acknowledgments

We thank La Papalota, Finca Ecológica A. C. and the crew of volunteers and students who provided invaluable field support. We are most grateful to Salvador Herrando-Pérez and to an anonymous reviewer who provided constructive suggestions to greatly improve the article, to Elizabeth Bastiaans and Mark Stackhouse for the language review, and to Edgar Germán Fregoso Rodríguez for the elaboration of the study area map.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: All the Mexican people through the National Systems of Researchers (54804) of the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) and the program for the protection and recovery of endangered species (Pronatura Noroeste) funded this study.

References

1.

Aguilar-López, M., Ramos-Frías, J., Rojas-Martínez, A. E., Cornejo-Latorre, C., (2015) First record of jaguar (Panthera onca) from the state of Hidalgo, México. Western North American Naturalist 75: 520–525. Google Scholar

2.

Balme, G., Hunter, L. T. B., (2004) Mortality in a protected leopard population, Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa: A population in decline. Ecological Journal 6: 1–6. Google Scholar

3.

Baum, K. A., Haynes, K. J., Dillemuth, F. P., Cronin, J. T., (2004) The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones. Ecology 85(10): 2671–2676. Google Scholar

4.

Caso, A., Lopez-Gonzalez, C., Payan, E., Eizirik, E., de Oliveira, T., Leite-Pitman, R., Valderrama, C., (2008) Panthera onca. In: Nowell, K., Breitenmoser-Wursten, C., Breitenmoser, U., Schipper, J., (eds) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved from  http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T15953A5327466.enGoogle Scholar

5.

Cavalcanti, S. M. C., Gese, E. M., (2009) Spatial ecology and social interactions of jaguars (Panthera onca) in the southern Pantanal, Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy 90: 935–945. Google Scholar

6.

Ceballos, G., Chávez, C., Zarza, H., (2012) Censo nacional del jaguar y sus presas (1a etapa) [National census of the jaguar and its prey 1st stage], México, D.F: CONANP, IE-UNAM, ALIANZA WWF-TELCEL, TELMEX y CONABIO. Google Scholar

7.

Chávez, C., Zarza, H., de la Torre, J. A., Medellín, R. A., & Ceballos, G. (2016). Capítulo 2. Distribución y estado de conservación del jaguar en México [Distribution and conservation status of the jaguar in Mexico]. In R. A. Medellín, J. A. de la Torre, H. Zarza, C. Chávez, & G. Ceballos (contributors), El jaguar en el siglo XXI. La perspectiva continental [The jaguar in the 21st century. The continental perspective] (pp. 47–92). Mexico City, Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, UNAM, Instituto de Ecología. Google Scholar

8.

Chávez-Tovar, C., Aranda, M., & Ceballos, G. (2006). Panthera onca. In Fondo de Cultura Económica y Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (Eds.), Los mamíferos silvestres de México [Wild mammals of Mexico] (pp. 367–370). Fondo de Cultura Económica and Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Google Scholar

9.

Chávez-Tovar, C., Zarza, H., (2009) Distribución potencial del hábitat del jaguar y áreas de conflicto humano-jaguar en la península de Yucatán [Potential distribution of the habitat of the jaguar and jaguar-human conflict areas in the Yucatan Peninsula]. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología 13: 46–62. Google Scholar

10.

de Almeida, T., (1990) Jaguar hunting in the Mato Grosso and Bolivia, Long Beach, CA: Safari Press. Google Scholar

11.

de la Torre, A. J., González-Maya, J. F., Zarza, H., Ceballos, G., Medellín, R. A., (2017) The jaguar’s spots are darker than they appear: Assessing the global conservation status of the jaguar Panthera onca. Oryx 2017: 1–16. Google Scholar

12.

Figel, J. J., Ruíz-Gutiérrez, F., Brown, D. E., (2016) Densities and perceptions of jaguars in coastal Nayarit, Mexico. Wildlife Society Bulletin 40: 506–513. Google Scholar

13.

Goodrich, J. M., Kerley, L. L., Smirnov, E. N., Miquelle, D. G., McDonald, L., Quigley, H. B., McDonald, T., (2008) Survival rates and causes of mortality of Amur tigers on and near the SikhoteAlin Biosphere Zapovednik. Journal of Zoology 276: 323–329. Google Scholar

14.

Haag, T., Santos, A. S., Sana, D. A., Morato, R. G., CullenL. Jr. CrawshawP. G. Jr.Eizirik, E., (2010) The effect of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of a top predator: Loss of diversity and high differentiation among remnant populations of Atlantic Forest jaguars (Panthera onca). Molecular Ecology 19: 4906–4921. Google Scholar

15.

Harris, G., Thompson, R., Childs, J. L., Sanderson, J. G., (2010) Automatic storage and analysis of camera trap data. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 91: 352–360. Google Scholar

16.

Hoogesteijn, R., Mondolfi, E., (1992) El jaguar. Tigre Americano [Jaguar. American tiger], Caracas, Venezuela: Armitano Editores. Google Scholar

17.

Logan, K. A., Sweanor, L. L., (2001) Desert puma: Evolutionary ecology and conservation of an enduring carnivore, Covelo, CA: Island Press. Google Scholar

18.

Luja, V. H., et al. (In preparation). Diet and potential preys of the Jaguar (Panthera onca) in the natural protected area “La Papalota”. Santiago Ixcuintla, Nayarit, Mexico. Google Scholar

19.

Maffei, L., Cuéllar, E., Noss, A., (2002) Uso de trampas-cámara para la evaluación de mamíferos en el ecotono Chaco-Chiquitanía [Use of camera traps for the evaluation of mammals in the Chaco-Chiquitanía ecotone]. Revista Boliviana de Ecología y Conservación Ambiental 11: 55–65. Google Scholar

20.

Maffei, L., Noss, A. J., Silver, S. C., Kelly, M. J., (2011) Abundance/density case study: Jaguars in the Americas. In: O'Connell, A. F., Nichols, J. D., Ullas Karanth, K., (eds) Camera traps in animal ecology, Tokyo, Japan: Springer Japan, pp. 119–144. Google Scholar

21.

Medellín, R. A., de la Torre, J. A., Zarza, H., Chávez, C., & Ceballos, G. (contributors). (2017). El Jaguar en el siglo XXI. La perspectiva continental [The jaguar in the 21st century. The continental perspective]. Mexico City, Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, UNAM, Instituto de Ecología. Google Scholar

22.

Monroy-Vilchis, O., Rodríguez-Soto, C., Zarco-González, M., Urios, V., (2009) Cougar and jaguar habitat use and activity patterns in central Mexico. Animal Biology 59(2): 145–157. Google Scholar

23.

Monroy-Vilchis, O., Sánchez, Ó., Aguilera-Reyes, U., Suárez, P., Urios, V., (2008) Jaguar (Panthera onca) in the state of Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 53: 533–537. Google Scholar

24.

Navarro-Serment, C. J., López-González, C. A., Gallo-Reynoso, J. P., (2005) Occurrence of jaguar (Panthera onca) in Sinaloa, Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 50: 102–106. Google Scholar

25.

Nowell, K., Jackson, P., (1996) Wild cats: Status survey and conservation action plan, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group. Google Scholar

26.

Núñez, R., Miller, B., Lindzey, F., (2002) Ecología del jaguar en la Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco, México [Ecology of the jaguar in the Biosphere Reserve Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco, Mexico]. In: Medellín, R. A., Equihua, C., Chetkiewicz, C. L. B., Taber, A., (eds) El Jaguar en el Nuevo Milenio, Mexico City, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Wildlife Conservation Society, pp. 107–125. Google Scholar

27.

Núñez-Pérez, R. (2006). Patrones de actividad, movimiento y ámbito hogareño del jaguar y del puma en la reserva de la biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco [Activity patterns, movements, and home range of the jaguar and cougar in the Biosphere Reserve Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco] (master’s thesis). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico. Google Scholar

28.

O'Connell, A. F., Nichols, J. D., & Ullas Karanth, K. (Eds.). (2010). Camera traps in animal ecology. Tokyo, Japan: Springer Japan. Google Scholar

29.

Rabinowitz, A., (2014) An indomitable beast: The remarkable journey of the jaguar, Washington, DC: Island Press. Google Scholar

30.

Rabinowitz, A., Zeller, K. A., (2010) A range-wide model of landscape connectivity and conservation for the jaguar, Panthera onca. Biological Conservation 143: 939–945. Google Scholar

31.

Sanderson, E. W., Redford, K. H., Chetkiewicz, C-L. B., Medellin, R. A., Rabinowitz, A. R., Robinson, J. G., Taber, A. B., (2002) Planning to save a species: The jaguar as a model. Conservation Biology 16: 58–72. Google Scholar

32.

Saura, S., Bodin, Ö., Fortin, M. J., (2014) Stepping stones are crucial for species’ long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks. Journal of Applied Ecology 51(1): 171–182. Google Scholar

33.

Scognamillo, D., Maxit, I. E., Sunquist, M., Farrell, L., (2002) Ecología del jaguar y el problema de la depredación de ganado en un hato de los llanos venezolanos [Ecology of the jaguar and the problem of the predation of cattle in a herd of the Venezuelan plains]. In: Medellín, R. A., Equihua, C., Chetkiewicz, C. L. B., Taber, A., (eds) El jaguar en el nuevo milenio, Mexico City, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Wildlife Conservation Society, pp. 139–150. Google Scholar

34.

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (2010) Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 [Official Mexican Standard NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010], Mexico: Official Gazette of the Federation. Google Scholar

35.

Seymour, K. L., (1989) Panthera onca. Mammalian Species 340: 1–9. Google Scholar

36.

Soulé, M. E., Mills, L. S., (1998) No need to isolate genetics. Science 282: 1658–1659. Google Scholar

37.

Stockwell, C. A., Hendry, A. P., Kinnison, M. T., (2003) Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18(2): 94–101. Google Scholar

38.

Tobler, M. W., Carrillo-Percastegui, S. E., Hartley, A. Z., Powell, G. V., (2013) High jaguar densities and large population sizes in the core habitat of the southwestern Amazon. Biological Conservation 159: 375–381. Google Scholar

39.

Valenzuela-Galván, D., Castro-Campos, F., Servin, J., Martínez-Barona, M., Martínez-Montes, J. C., (2015) First contemporary record of jaguar in Morelos State and the Sierra de Huautla Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Western North American Naturalist 75: 370–373. Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2017 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Víctor H. Luja, Carlos J. Navarro, Luis Alberto Torres Covarrubias, Mauricio Cortés Hernández, and Ignacio Luis Vallarta Chan "Small Protected Areas as Stepping-Stones for Jaguars in Western Mexico," Tropical Conservation Science 10(1), (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917717051
Received: 18 April 2017; Accepted: 3 June 2017; Published: 1 January 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top