Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2020 Differential Effects of Fire on Small Mammal Communities in the Busanga Flood Plain, Zambia
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We assessed effects of vegetation and fire on small mammals in open vegetation formations of the Busanga Flood Plain (Kafue National Park, Zambia) in areas of low and high fire recurrence. The impact of fire was related further to the time elapsed between the last fire and the time of trapping (fire age). Sampling sites covered three management zones: intensive utilization (tourist areas), wild (less used), and wilderness (no road access). Vegetation type, fire recurrence, fire age, and management zone were independent variables. Communities were similar in grassland and on termitaria but differed from miombo. Species richness was highest on termitaria, followed by grassland and miombo. Species numbers declined with increasing fire frequency but were unaffected by fire age. In contrast, the average body mass of species occurring at any one site (only adult individuals considered) declined with the time elapsed between the time of capture and the last fire (the longer the time interval, the lower the body mass of species averaged over the species found at the site). This response implies higher vulnerability of the smaller species to fire and slower recolonization potential of smaller species after fire. The interactions between fire, vegetation characteristics, and small mammals need to be reviewed, given their importance in the functionality of this ecosystem.

Fire is an integral part of African savannah ecosystems (Green, Roloff, Heath, & Holekamp, 2015; Parr & Chowan, 2003; Plasvic, 2014; Salvatori, Egunyu, Skidmore, de Leeuw, & van Gills, 2001; Swanepoel, 1981). In concert with grazing by large herbivores, it determines the physiognomy of large tracts of land. Apart from being a natural phenomenon, fire is widely used as a management tool in protected areas in Africa. The purpose of its use ranges from clearing vegetation for photographic tourism to fostering pastures for wildlife (Chanda, 2007; Green et al., 2015; Kampamba, Chansa, & Changwe, 2005; Parr & Chowan, 2003). In the Kafue National Park (KNP), Zambia, fire is predominately used during the early dry season (May to mid-July) as a means of reducing the probability of catastrophic fires, and to improve visibility for tourists to view and photograph game. Fires are set along the boundaries, access roads and fire breaks. Other management objectives for fire include: inducing fresh forage flush for wildlife grazing, fostering natural succession of fire sensitive vegetation, reducing soil erosion in the event of late season fires, and controlling insect pests (Chanda, 2007; National Parks and Wildlife Services/Japan International Cooperation Agency [NPWS/JICA], 1999).

Whilst most early fires are started by management, unplanned fires at any time of the year outnumber them (Chanda, 2007). These were earlier thought to originate from local communities in the Open and Game Management Areas bordering KNP (Chanda, 2007), but recent evidence alludes to fires beginning and occurring more frequently in the park as opposed to the Game Management Areas or open areas (Kelly, 2014). In fact, the park has the largest proportion of areas with high fire recurrence (Figure 1) even in critical habitats such as the Busanga Flood Plain.

Figure 1.

Sampling sites depicting the vegetation, fire recurrence, and management zones in the Busanga Flood Plain, north–west of Kafue National Park. Fire occurrences indicate the number of years with fire between 2000 and 2013 (base map from Kelly, 2014).

10.1177_1940082917725439-fig1.tif

Given the size of KNP (∼22,400 km2) and the lean resources available to manage it, (NPWS/JICA, 1999; Zambia Wildlife Authority [ZAWA], 2011) unplanned fires remain a major challenge to conservation. Most of the Park’s rangeland is burnt annually, despite the prescribed rest interval of 2 to 3 years in its fire management plan. Furthermore, early burning as per current practice does not favor all wildlands. For instance in areas such as the Busanga Flood Plain (predominately a grassland), early fires are thought to interfere with processes such as rooting, seeding, and seed dispersal for grasses (Moss, 1973). The extent of interference is thought to directly depend on the amount of rainfall received. In a wet year (>1,000 mm), most areas remain moist till the mid dry season (July to August), thereby inhibiting the spread of early fires. The rainy season in Zambia ends in April and paves way for the dry season which begins in May and lasts to early November (ZAWA, 2011).

Very little is known about the influence of the current fire regime on biodiversity in KNP (Kinahan, 2003). Stakeholders speculate on a significant alteration in the vegetation structure that would result in reduced fodder and cover for species (Parr & Chowan, 2003). Small mammals are a matter of concern, as faunal studies in KNP tend to focus on larger species (ZAWA, 2005). Yet, small mammals (rodents and shrews) play a cardinal role in ecosystem functionality. They occur at several trophic levels, consuming substantial amounts of plant material, insects, and arthropods; serve as prey; and are important for perturbation of the soil (MacFadyen, Avenant, van der Merwe, & Bredenkamp, 2012; Timbuka & Kabigumila, 2006).

While several studies demonstrated the impact of fire and vegetation cover on small mammal communities, the evidence for fire effects is inconsistent. Some authors have described fire as having little impact on small mammal diversity, unless coupled with grazing (Salvatori et al., 2001) and rainfall (Yarnell, Scott, Chimimba, & Metacalfe, 2007). Others describe its effects as short lived and associated with the removal of vegetation cover (Plavsic, 2014; Swanepoel, 1981). Yet others describe it as having a positive impact on small mammal diversity, as species diversity is higher in areas where fire is a periodic disturbance (Bowland & Perrin, 1993). In the drier savanna regions (Kalahari savannah rangelands), species richness and abundances of small mammals had been negatively affected by shrub encroachment, brought about by overgrazing (Blaum, Rossmanith, & Jeltsch, 2006), though grazing itself had no significant impact (Bösing, Haarmeyer, Dengler, Ganzhorn, & Schmiedel, 2014).

Similar to the situation described for grazing, fire as a single factor didn’t have a direct impact on small mammals (Swanepoel, 1981; Yarnell et al., 2007) but acted through the animals’ response to reduced cover to emigrate or avert predation. Diurnal species seem to be more affected by the removal of vegetation cover as nocturnal species, as the former would be more prone to predation than the nocturnal species, whose predators rely on hearing or smell to detect prey (Hauptfleisch & Avenant, 2015; Joubert & Ryan, 1999). For the time being, it seems premature to try synthesizing these disconnected results, as the different studies consider different environmental drivers in different combinations and have been carried out in different regions. Yet, they provide the basis and framework to add on to.

Ecological studies and community comparisons between sites are often hampered by taxonomic issues, such as different species compositions or taxonomic uncertainties that make comparisons difficult. Functional and life history traits can be used to replace species names and thus replace site specific taxonomies by generalizable characteristics that facilitate comparisons between sites (Fox, 2011; Violle et al., 2007). As illustrated by the different predation risk of diurnal versus nocturnal species (Hauptfleisch & Avenant, 2015; Joubert & Ryan, 1999), the survival or persistence of species after disturbances of their habitat can often be linked to its life history or functional traits (Plavsic, 2014). Since body mass shows allometric relationships to a large number of life history traits (e.g., mobility, home range size, resistance to variation, and reproductive traits), it can be used as a proxy for life history traits that are favorable or unfavorable under different disturbance regimes (e.g., Brown, 1984; Stearns, 1992).

In order to fill some of the gaps in our knowledge of small mammal interactions with vegetation formations and ambient conditions, we addressed the following questions:

  1. What are the effects of vegetation types, fire recurrence, and the time since the last fire (fire age) on the taxonomic composition and similarity of small mammal communities in the Busanga Flood Plain?

  2. What are the effects of vegetation types, fire recurrence, and fire age on the species richness of small mammals in different communities in the Busanga Flood Plain?

  3. What are the effects of vegetation types, fire recurrence, and fire age on body mass and functional traits of small mammal communities in the Busanga Flood Plain?

Method

Study Area

The Busanga Flood Plain is located between about 25° 25' E/13° 45' S to 26° 10' E/14° 25' S and covers some 750 km2 (NPWS/JICA, 1999). It is a wetland of international importance listed as Ramsar site no. 1659 of the Ramsar Convention of Wetlands of International Importance (Information sheet on Ramsar Wetlands [RIS], 2002). It is principally drained by the Lufupa River that constitutes the middle catchment area of the Kafue river basin (RIS, 2002). This basin is the largest subbasin of the Zambezi River (156,995 km2) and lies entirely within Zambia. The Kafue Basin is often described as the lifeline for most of Zambia (ZAWA, 2011), as it is the main provider of water for major cities and most of Zambia’s wildlife estate. Annual rainfall is around 1,100 mm and begins to fall in November, ending in April the following year. The dry season (May to November) is divided into two season; cool, dry (May to August), and hot, dry (Septemberto November; ZAWA, 2011).

Trapping Sites

Trapping sites where categorized based on vegetation type, management zone, fire regime, and fire age (Table 1). These characteristics were used as independent variables in the analyses. Based on the vegetation descriptions by Mwima (2006), management zones (NPWS/JICA, 1999), and fire recurrence (Kelly, 2014), 17 sampling sites were established by stratified random assignments. The initial intention was to achieve a balanced design of capture sites for the vegetation types of grassland, termitaria, and miombo forest. Since we could not find a termitaria site with low fire recurrence in the wild zone, we achieved only an unbalanced design for termitaria. Sites could not be stratified systematically with respect to fire age.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Capture sites.

10.1177_1940082917725439-table1.tif

Data Collection

All data were collected during the dry seasons (August to October) of 2014 and 2015. Wet season captures were not possible as the Busanga Flood Plain is flooded during the wet season and is not accessible till the mid dry season. Each site consisted of three transects spaced 300 to 500 m apart, each containing 22 Sherman traps, 11 pitfall traps, and 8 Tomahawk traps. Procedures for setting these traps followed protocols described by Stanley, Goodman, and Hutterer (2011) and Stanley and Goodman (2011a, 2011b), who demonstrated the effectiveness of trap and pitfall lines to trap insectivores and medium sized rodents. For rodents, 22 Sherman Live Traps (Large Folding Aluminum Treadles and Doors Galvanized traps [LFA-TDG] 7.5 × 9 × 23 cm) were placed every 5 m on the ground along a 110 m transect. Eight collapsible Tomahawk traps (four traps of 41 × 13 × 13 cm and four traps of 48 × 15 × 15 cm size with one door) were set 5 to 10 m perpendicular to the Sherman trap line. For shrews and rodents that are too small to release the Sherman traps, 50 m pitfall lines were established (Stanley et al., 2011). Each pitfall line consisted of 11 buckets, set 5 m apart, and buried in the ground with the top of the bucket flush with the ground. The 15-l buckets measured 26 cm high, 26 cm in upper diameter, and 24 cm in lower diameter. Traps were exposed for 3 days and nights and were checked twice per day (morning 06–07 hr and evening 16–17 hr), resulting in 99 trap nights for pitfall traps and 270 trap nights for Sherman and Tomahawk traps per site (3 transects × 30 Sherman and Tomahawk traps × 3 nights). Sherman and Tomahawk traps were baited with oats and peanut butter. Pesola precision spring scales (accurate to 0.1 g) were used to measure body mass. Some animals were sacrificed and specimen was deposited in the collection of Copperbelt University, Zambia. Individuals who were released were marked by fur cuttings to avoid recounting them in case of recaptures. Recaptures were not considered in any of the analyses. Body mass was considered as a proxy for body size. Both measures show allometric relationships to various aspects of animals’ ecology and physiology (Brown, 1984; Iskjaer, Slade, Childs, Glass, & Korch, 1989).

Analyses

All data were collated in Microsoft Excel and later uploaded into SPSS 22.0 for statistical analysis. The data from the three transects per site were pooled for statistical analyses. The dependent variables “species richness” and “log body mass” were tested for deviations from normality using Kolmogorov–Smirnov one sample tests. Neither variable deviated from normality (p = .2 for both variables).

Composition and Similarities of Small Mammal Communities

Small mammal communities per site were characterized by taxonomic community composition, species richness, body mass, and functional groups. Taxonomic community composition was described with nonmetric dimensional scaling (NMDS). NMDS integrates community measures, that is, dissimilarity, diversity, and abundance to generate matrices. Differences in species composition between vegetation types and fire effects were determined by permutational multivariate analyses of variance (perMANOVA) used in the function adonis() in R package vegan (Oksanen et al., 2015). The analyses were based on community dissimilarity matrices by calculating Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of relative abundance data (Nopper, Ranaivojaona, Riemann, Rödel, & Ganzhorn, 2017). Sites that did not have any species captured were excluded from the analysis. Stress of matrices attained was 0.08. PerMANOVA was used to test for significant dissimilarities between communities in relation to vegetation types, management zones, and fire.

Species Richness

Species richness was used to describe community composition. General linear models were employed to determine whether vegetation types, management zones, and fire recurrence as fixed factors and fire age as continuous variable had an impact on species richness and on the mean body mass of the small mammal community per site. Due to small sample size, it was not possible to include all factors in a single model. We combined vegetation type, fire recurrence, and management zone in various combinations to determine their combined influence on species richness (i.e., vegetation type × fire recurrence; vegetation type × management zone; fire recurrence × management zone). To account for effects of vegetation types without having to enter “vegetation type” as an additional factor, we z transformed species number per vegetation type. This transformed species numbers per vegetation type to z values with a mean of zero and unit variance.

Body Mass and Functional Traits

Body mass and diet were considered as proxies for life history and functional traits. We assessed the influence of vegetation types and fire (recurrence and age) on body mass by calculating the average body mass for each species using only adult animals collected at all sampling sites. Given the small number of individuals caught at most sites, we did not attempt to use body mass as a proxy for body condition or reproductive success that could be used if we had considered juveniles or some kind of measure for body condition. Rather, the average body mass for each species was applied uniformly to the species caught at each of the sampling sites. The mean body mass of the small mammal community per site (=mean of the species body mass of on all species caught at a site) was calculated as the unweighted mean of the body mass of the species caught per site. Mean body mass per site could not be calculated for two sites of miombo, as no animals had been caught there. Logarithmic transformation to the base of 10 was carried out on mean body mass prior to statistical analyses to achieve normality. To account for effects of vegetation types without having to enter “vegetation type” as an additional factor, we z transformed the mean body mass per vegetation type. This transformed the body mass of species averaged over the species occurring there to z values with a mean of zero and unit variance. Statistical analyses were performed as for species richness. Pearson’s correlations were used to assess relationships of fire age to species richness and body mass in the two fire recurrence areas. Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance was used to determine differences in the representation of dietary guilds between vegetation types.

Functional traits have been compiled from the literature for all small mammal species (Rodentia, Soricomorpha, and Macroscelidea) known from KNP. Species information was obtained from Ansell (1960, 1978); Benadie and Roche (2010); Burda, Zima, Scharff, Macholan, and Kawalika (1999); Chidumayo (1979, 1980); Happold (2013); Happold and Happold (2013); Kawalika (2004); Kingdon (1997); Kingdonet al. (2013a, b); Lancester (1951); Larson (1957); NPWS/JICA (1999); and ZAWA (2013). The information for all species recorded from the region so far has been summarized by Namukonde, Muleya, and Ganzhorn (in press). Given the large number of possible combinations of life history traits, the number of species captured in the present study was too low to analyze associations of most of these traits quantitatively in the context of this study. With the exception of dietary categories, we therefore describe only some traits qualitatively as they seem important to interpret the results of the study.

Results

Composition and Similarity of Small Mammal Communities

During the dry seasons of 2014 and 2015, we captured 105 small mammals belonging to 16 species (11 rodent and 5 shrew species) in the 51 transects assigned to 17 different sites. Even though the inventories were likely to be incomplete, the standardized trapping efforts at all sites should allow robust comparisons between sites and conditions (Tables 2 and 3). The number of individuals caught per site did not differ between vegetation types (Kruskal–Wallis test: χ2 = 3.31; p = .19; df = 2), and the number of individuals caught was not correlated with species richness at the sites (Spearman correlation: rs = .42; p = .12; n = 15; the correlation was calculated without the two sites were no animals had been caught).

Table 2.

Trapping Sites with Three Trap Lines Per Site Installed in the Busanga Flood Plain.

10.1177_1940082917725439-table3.tif

Table 3.

Transect Characteristics and Small Mammal Captures in the Busanga Flood Plains in 2014 and 2015.

10.1177_1940082917725439-table2.tif

Of the 105 individuals captured (recaptures were not considered here), we caught 52 (49.52%) in grassland, 33 (31.42%) in termitaria, and 20 (19.05%) in miombo. The species caught in these vegetation types represent a subsample of species known from the region (Namukonde et al., in press). The most abundant species, Mastomys natalensis, was captured in all habitats with varying abundances. Its abundance was lowest in miombo, where only one (corresponding to 2.9% of all individuals caught in this vegetation type) individual was trapped. Grassland had the highest abundance of M. natalensis (21 individuals, 61.8% of captures), followed by termitaria (12 individuals, 35.3% of captures). The species is known as a generalist that can cope with all kinds of disturbances but seems to be less prone to enter extended forested habitats, as it was caught at all grassland and termitaria sites but was found at only one transect with only one individual in miombo (Table 3). Mus minutoides is the smallest rodent and Crocidura fuscomurina is the smallest of the shrews caught in the present study (both about 3–4 g). Both species were caught mostly on termitaria and in one grassland transect. Species captured in only one vegetation type included Crocidura cyaena, C. mariquensis and Otomys angoniensis in grassland and Steatomys pratensis, Mus triton, Lemniscoyms rosalia, and Saccostomus campestris in termitaria. All species, except for C. mariquensis (that is associated with marshes) can be considered generalists that are expected in a wide range of habitats.

The small mammal communities differed significantly between vegetation types (perMANOVA: F = 3.34; p < .01; Figure 2). Communities in grassland and termitaria were rather similar while communities of miombo were set apart. This is due to the low number of species caught in miombo, the lack of insectivores caught in this vegetation type and the frequent occurrence of arboreal squirrels (Paraxerus cepapi; though squirrels were also caught on one termitaria site). Communities did not differ significantly with respect to management zone, fire recurrence or fire age (F < 1.18; p > .24 for all three analyses).

Figure 2.

Nonmetric dimensional scaling of the small mammal communities in different vegetation types of the Busanga Flood Plain.

10.1177_1940082917725439-fig2.tif

Species Richness

The most species rich vegetation type was on termitaria (nine rodent species, two shrew species; mean and standard deviation: 3.6 ± 1.1 species/site; n = 5), followed by grassland (five rodents, five shrews; 2.5 ± 1.0 species/site; n = 6) and miombo (three rodents, no shrews 1.0 ± 0.9 species/site; n = 6; Figure 3). Species richness differed significantly between vegetation types (analysis of variance: F(2, 14) = 8.97; p = .003.

Figure 3.

Small mammal species richness in different vegetation types. Values are medians, quartiles, and ranges; N = 5, 6, and 6 sites for termitaria, grassland, and miombo, respectively.

10.1177_1940082917725439-fig3.tif

All subsequent statistical analyses were based on species richness after z transformation per vegetation type to account for differences between vegetation types. Species richness did not differ between management zones, F(2, 14) = 0.34; p = .72. In single factor analysis, there was a tendency but no significant difference of small mammal species richness between the low and high fire recurrence areas, F(1, 15) = 7.77; p = .07. As a single factor, fire age was also uncorrelated with species richness (Pearson correlation: r = −.08; p = .75; n = 17). When combining fire recurrence and fire age, the effect of fire recurrence became significant, while fire age remained nonsignificant (General Linear Model [GLM]: fire age: F = 1.02; p = .33; fire recurrence: F = 4.66, p = .049; and model: F = 2.40, p = .13; Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Relationship between fire age and small mammal species richness at sites subject to low or high fire recurrence. Species numbers were z transformed per vegetation type. Categories of “fire age": 1 = very recent burn from the mid fire season of the same year of trapping; 2 = area burnt during the early fire season in same year of trapping; 3 = area with fire scars from the previous years’ burning season; 4 = area without or very few fire scars from several years ago. ○ = grassland, □ = termitaria, and Δ = miombo; open symbols: low fire recurrence; filled symbols: high fire recurrence.

10.1177_1940082917725439-fig4.tif

Body Mass and Functional Traits

Based on literature classification of life history traits, small mammals of KNP are predominately omnivorous and nocturnal with body mass ranging from 3.06 g (Crocidura fuscomurina) to 189.30 g (Paraxerus cepapi; Table 3). The percentage of omnivorous and granivorous species differed significantly between vegetation types (Kruskal–Wallis test: Omnivores: H = 7.56; p = .02; Granivores: H = 6.90; p = .03; Figure 5). Granivores were only captured in termitaria and were represented by two species (Steatomys pratensis and Saccostomus campestris) that shelter in burrows excavated by themselves or by spring hares or aardvarks, in sandy soils or termite mounds (Kingdon et al., 2013a). In the absence of sandy soils as is the case in the Busanga Flood Plain (Mwima, 2016), these two species will most likely burrow in termite mounds.

Figure 5.

Relative representation of different trophic guilds in different vegetation types. Finely dotted = omnivores, checkerboard = herbivores, black = granivores, and striped = insectivores.

10.1177_1940082917725439-fig5.tif

In grassland, 100% of the species caught were terrestrial and small. In termitaria, most of the small species from the grassland were present plus a few other small terrestrial species. In addition, the large arboreal squirrel Paraxerus cepapi has been caught at one termitaria site. None of the small shrews, and only one of the smaller rodent species have been captured in miombo (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Body mass of species caught in different vegetation types of the Busanga Flood Plain. Each entry marks one species. All individuals of a given species were assigned the same body mass in all vegetation types; ○ = rodents and ⋄ = shrews.

10.1177_1940082917725439-fig6.tif

The squirrel Paraxerus cepapi is the only species classified as truly arboreal. Since, on average, more species were caught at termitaria sites than at miombo sites and since P. cepapi was caught only at one termitaria site but at two miombo sites, the relative contribution of this one arboreal species for the termitaria community was lower than for miombo communities, where P. cepapi was one of the three species (= 33% of the species) caught in miombo. Due to this unequal representation and since P. cepapi has a substantially higher body mass than any of the terrestrial species, average body mass of the small mammal species per site was significantly higher in miombo than at the other sites, F(2, 12) = 6.74; p = .01; Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Mean body mass of species in different vegetation types of the Busanga Flood Plain. Values are means and 95% confidence intervals. N = 5, 6, and 4 for termitaria, grassland, and miombo, respectively.

10.1177_1940082917725439-fig7.tif

The allometric relationship between body mass and arboreality would bias any analysis of body mass in relation to environmental variables. Therefore, all subsequent statistical analyses were based on mean body mass after z transformation per vegetation type to account for differences between vegetation types. Z transformed mean body mass did not differ between management zones, F(2, 12) = 0.98; p = .40 and fire recurrence, F(1, 13) = .49; p = 51. Two-way analysis of variance indicated no significant interactions of these factors on body mass (fire recurrence × management zone: p > .05). Overall, the mean body mass of small mammal species caught per site decreased significantly with the time elapsed since the last fire (Pearson correlation: r = −.57; p = .03; n = 15). When combining fire recurrence and fire age, the effect of fire age remained significant (GLM: fire age: F = 5.17, p = .04; fire recurrence: F = 0.02, p = .88; model: F = 2.91, p = .09; Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Relationship between fire and averaged body mass of small mammal species per site at sites subject to low or high fire recurrence. Average body mass of small mammal species was z transformed per vegetation type. Categories of “fire age": 1 = very recent burn from the mid fire season of the same year of trapping; 2 = area burnt during the early fire season in same year of trapping; 3 = area with fire scars from the previous years’ burning season; 4 = area without or very few fire scars from several years ago. ○ = grassland, □ = termitaria, and Δ = miombo; open symbols: low fire recurrence; filled symbols: high fire recurrence.

10.1177_1940082917725439-fig8.tif

Discussion

Fire is an important component of African savannah ecosystems and often used as a management tool for conservation and tourist activities. Yet, the interplay between vegetation and fire and their effects on the diversity and structure of small mammal communities is not understood and studies yielded differing results (e.g., Blaum et al., 2006; Bösing et al., 2014; Decher & Bahian, 1999; Hauptfleisch & Avenant 2015; Joubert & Ryan, 1999; Yarnell, Metcalfe, Dunstone, Burnside, & Scott, 2008). In view of their possible importance for ecosystem processes, we assessed the composition and traits of small mammal communities in the three major vegetation types of the Busanga Flood Plain and assessed the influence of fire (recurrence and age) on their community characteristics. In the Busanga Flood Plain, termitaria mainly occur as interspaced elevated patches in grasslands that provide islands of refuge in times of floods during the wet season. During the dry season, they might also provide more shelter against fire, as it is easy to dig burrows in the previous termite mounds while the surrounding floodplain can be extremely hard to dig in once the soil has dried out. Thus, termitaria are likely to serve as refuge and source for recolonization of areas after disturbance during the wet as well as during the dry season (Bowland & Perrin, 1993; Parr & Chowan, 2003). This might explain the higher species richness and greater variety of dietary guilds on termitaria than in the neighboring grassland that might need to be recolonized repeatedly during the course of the year.

Miombo occurs at the fringes of the Busanga Flood Plain and as it is structurally enriched with more trees than found in grassland. Due to the increased heterogeneity of the vegetation, we had expected greater species richness of small mammals. Yet this was not the case. While our traps were not designed to catch larger species, the lack of small sized species in miombo is startling. This is even more so as a review of the small mammal inventories in KNP based on published reports had indicated higher species richness for woodlands (Namukonde et al., in press). Miombo is considered a vegetation formation growing on poor soil and thus not being very productive (East, 1984; Desanker, Frost, Justice, & Scholes, 1997; Campbell et al., 2007), while termitaria are characterized by good soil conditions that promotes plant growth (Otieno et al., 2011). While high productivity soil results in high biomass across trophic levels, the link between productivity and species diversity remains unclear despite decades of research and seems to depend on local conditions, including habitat structure that is likely to obscure productivity—diversity relationships when considered across different vegetation types (Liang et al., 2016, Simons et al., 2017; Socher et al., 2012, 2013; Srivastava & Lawton 1998). Thus, miombo might be as rich in small mammal species as the other two vegetation types, although the densities of the terrestrial small mammals might be lower. If so, our results (low species richness in miombo) might not so much be a consequence of low species numbers occurring in miombo but might be due to low densities of species and therefore low capture rates.

Effects of fire were quite variable. While we were able to estimate fire frequencies, fire intensity could not be measured, though it is likely to be important. Early dry season fires (such as prescribed by the management plan) are less intense and severe than late dry season fires owing to the seasonal differences in the fuel moisture levels and loads (Govender, Trollope, & van Wilgen, 2006; Smit, Asner, Govender, Vaughn, & van Wilgen, 2016). It is assumed that fire intensity has pronounced effects on the distribution and composition of small mammal communities in different habitats. Despite the important role of fire, and probably due to the difficulties in measuring fire properties (such as intensity), the interactions between fire, grazing, and precipitation are still not understood well for large herbivore communities, let alone for small mammals (e.g., Archibald, 2008; Archibald, Bond, Stock, & Fairbanks, 2005). Integrating some kind of indicator for fire intensities at ground level and in the canopy (where applicable) might be a valuable addition to future analyses of fire effects.

To make the analyses more complex, fire does not only act directly simply by burning but also indirectly through reduction in vegetation cover, through reduction in food availability, or fire history can impart demographic legacies on vegetation structure and dynamics, such as documented in Kruger National Park (Levick, Baldeck, & Asner, 2015). On the level of species richness, areas that are burnt frequently in contradiction to the prescriptions of fire management plan of the area had fewer species irrespective of the time elapsed since the last fire had occurred. This might indicate restrictions by fire regimes imposed upon small mammals and might reflect a similar phenomenon as described by Rowe-Rowe (1995) who suggested that species of small mammals are adapted to either frequent or infrequent burning. Despite the extensive trapping effort, we could not identify any species, traits, or combination of traits that would allow describing a pattern in the phenomenon of declining species numbers with increasing fire frequency. The phenomenon was observed, but our data are too scant to allow for interpretations of this phenomenon based on species identities or species traits.

The representation of species with different body mass found in communities at different times since the last fire has gone through the area might be easier to interpret. As time goes by after a fire, more smaller species were represented in the community (Figure 8). Thus, smaller species seem to be more affected by burning than larger species. A possible explanation could be that smaller species have more problems than larger species to escape fire, and once they are gone, there are very few left to recolonize burnt areas. Also, given that body mass correlates positively with mobility and home range size (Lindstedt, Miller, & Buskirk, 1986; Lomolino & Perault, 2006; Swihart, Slade, & Bergstorm, 1988), larger species have larger home ranges and are more likely to utilize the escape routes provided by the intervening termitaria and to recolonize the area again after fire. Certainly, other traits could also be responsible for the observed differences, such as diet, which determines a species ability to make use of the food resources available after a fire, locomotion, which is linked to the ability to escape disturbance (Golley, Petrusewicz, & Ryszkowski, 1975), or litter size and the number of litters per year, which determines a species ability to counter fire induced mortalities (Plasvic, 2014). Yet, for the Busanga Flood Plain, the information on life history traits of small mammals is too scant to allow further analyses of the interactions between species and environmental characteristics.

Implications for Conservation

Our study demonstrated different responses of different small mammals to the current fire regimes in the Busanga Flood Plain. Specifically, it demonstrates the impact of repeated bushfires on small mammal communities outside the prescriptions of the KNP’s Fire Management Plan. It also revealed substantial gaps in our knowledge on fundamental properties of small mammal species, let alone their interactions within this ecosystem. If small mammals react differently to different fire regimes, due to either direct fire effect or indirect effects, such as changes in vegetation characteristics, these different regimes might have long-term consequences that are far from being understood. Further, the vulnerability of small mammal communities to repeated bush fires in the Busanga Flood Plain may increase given the predicted changes in climate to drier and warmer conditions (Government of the Republic of Zambia, 2007; Kalantary, 2010; MacFadyen et al., 2012) that pertain in the late fire seasons and are likely to increase under the current climate scenarios. Given the possible importance of fire and small mammals in ecosystem processes, their interactions will need to be reviewed in more detail.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Department of National Parks and Wildlife of Zambia (DPNW) for permission granted to undertake this study. Gratitude is also extended to field assistants, Luke Zyambo (Senior Wildlife Police Officer–DNPW) and Thabo Liseli (Wildlife Police Officer–DNPW), staff at Treetops School Camp, and Musanza Tented Camp whose knowledge of the Busanga Flood Plain and small mammals was extremely valuable to this study. We appreciate Joachim Nopper’s help with the ordination analyses. The comments of Alejandro Estrada and the reviewers helped greatly to improve the article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Southern African Science Service Centre for Climate Change and Adaptive Land Management (BMBF SASSCAL Tasks 189, 052).

References

1.

AnsellW. F. H. (1960) The mammals of Northern Rhodesia, Lusaka, Zambia: Government Printer. Google Scholar

2.

AnsellW. F. H. (1978) The mammals of Zambia, Chilanga, Zambia: National Parks and Wildlife Services. Google Scholar

3.

ArchibaldS. (2008) African grazing lawns—How fire, rainfall, and grazer numbers interact to affect grass community states. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 492–501. Google Scholar

4.

ArchibaldS.BondW. J.StockW. D.FairbanksD. H. K. (2005) Shaping the landscape: Fire-grazer interactions in an African savanna. Ecological applications 15: 96–109. Google Scholar

5.

BenadieM.RocheC. (2010) Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi species checklist, Johannesburg, South Africa: Wilderness Safari. Google Scholar

6.

BlaumN.RossmanithE.JeltschF. (2006) Land use affects rodent communities in Kalahari savannah rangelands. African Journal of Ecology 45: 189–195. Google Scholar

7.

BösingM. B.HaarmeyerD. H.DenglerJ.GanzhornJ. U.SchmiedelU. (2014) Effects of livestock grazing and vegetation type characteristics on small mammal communities in the Knersvlakte, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 104: 124–131. Google Scholar

8.

BowlandJ. M.PerrinM. R. (1993) Wetlands as reservoirs for small mammal populations in the Natal Drakensberg. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 23: 39–43. Google Scholar

9.

BrownJ. H. (1984) Macroecology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

10.

BurdaH.ZimaJ.ScharffA.MacholanM.KawalikaM. (1999) The karyotypes of Cryptomys kafuensis sp. Noca: New species of common mole-rat from Zambia (Rodentia, Bathyergidae). Mammalian Biology 64: 36–50. Google Scholar

11.

CampbellB. M.AngelsenA.CunninghamA.KaterereY.SitoeA.WunderS. (2007) Miombo woodlands—Opportunities and barriers to sustainable forest management, Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research. Google Scholar

12.

ChandaJ. (2007) Fire management plan for Kafue National Park and its surrounding game management areas, Chilanga: Zambia Wildlife Authority. Google Scholar

13.

ChidumayoE. N. (1979) Ecological relations among small rodents inhabiting grasslands at Livingstone, Zambia. Zambian Journal of Science and Technology 4: 12–20. Google Scholar

14.

ChidumayoE. N. (1980) Population ecology of Tatera leucogaster (Rodentia) in southern Zambia. Journal of Zoology (Lond) 190: 325–335. Google Scholar

15.

DecherJ.BahianL. K. (1999) Diversity and structure of terrestrial small mammal communities in different vegetation types on the Accra Plains of Ghana. Journal of Zoology 247: 395–408. Google Scholar

16.

DesankerP. V.FrostP. G. HJusticeC.ScholesR. J. (1997) The Miombo network: framework for a terrestrial transect study of land use and land-cover change in the Miombo ecosystems of central Africa. IGBP Report 41, Stockholm, Sweden: The International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Google Scholar

17.

EastR. (1984) Rainfall, soil nutrient status and biomass of large African savanna mammals. African Journal of Ecology 22: 245–270. Google Scholar

18.

FoxB. J. (2011) Review of small mammal trophic structure in drylands: Resource availability, use, and disturbance. Journal of Mammalogy 92: 1179–1192. Google Scholar

19.

GreenS. D.RoloffG. J.HeathB. R.HolekampK. E. (2015) Temporal dynamics of the response by African mammals too prescribed fire. Journal of Wildlife Management 79: 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.827Google Scholar

20.

GolleyF. B.PetrusewiczK.RyszkowskiL. (1975) Small mammals: Their productivity and population dynamics, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

21.

GovenderN.TrollopeW. S. W.Van WilgenB. W. (2006) The effect of fire season, fire frequency, rainfall and management on fire intensity in savanna vegetation in South Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 748–758. Google Scholar

22.

Government of the Republic of Zambia. (2007). Formulation of the National Adaptation Programme of Action on climate change (Final Report). Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Natural Resources, Lusaka, Zambia. Google Scholar

23.

HappoldD. C. D. (2013) Mammals of Africa. Volume III: Rodents, hares and rabbits, London, England: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar

24.

HappoldM.HappoldD. C. D. (2013) Mammals of Africa. Volume IV: Hedgehogs, shrews and bats, London, England: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar

25.

HauptfleischM. L.AvenantN. L. (2015) Integrating small mammal community variables into aircraft-wildlife collision management plans at Namibian airports. Integrative Zoology 10: 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12160Google Scholar

26.

IskjaerC.SladeN. A.ChildsJ. E.GlassG. E.KorchG. W. (1989) Body mass as a measure of body size in small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 662–667. Google Scholar

27.

JoubertD. F.RyanP. G. (1999) Differences in mammal and bird assemblages between commercial and communal rangelands in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 43: 287–299. Google Scholar

28.

KalantaryC. (2010) Climate change in Zambia: Impacts and adaptation. Global Majority E-Journal 1: 85–96. Google Scholar

29.

KampambaG.ChansaW.ChangweK. (2005) Fire management plan for protected areas in Zambia, Chilanga: Zambia Wildlife Authority. Google Scholar

30.

Kawalika, M. (2004). Rodents of Ndola (Copperbelt Province, Zambia) (PhD thesis), Universität–Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg-Essen. Google Scholar

31.

KellyD. (2014) A map of the Kafue ecosystem: Fire history 2000–2013, Lusaka, Zambia: The Nature Conservancy. Google Scholar

32.

KinahanA. (2003) A summary report on the small mammals of KNP Southern sector; Based on Ngoma and the surrounding areas, Itezhi-tezhi: Zambia Wildlife Authority. Google Scholar

33.

KingdonJ. (1997) The kingdon Guide to African Mammals, London, England: A&C Black. Google Scholar

34.

KingdonJ.HappoldD. C. D.ButynskiT. M.HoffmannM.HappoldM.KalinaJ. (2013a) Mammals of Africa, Volume III: Rodents, hares and rabbits, London, England: Bloomsburg Publishing. Google Scholar

35.

KingdonJ.HappoldD. C. D.ButynskiT. M.HoffmannM.HappoldM.KalinaJ. (2013b) Mammals of Africa, Volume IV: Hedgehogs, shrews and bats, London, England: Bloomsburg. Google Scholar

36.

LancasterD. G. (1951) A checklist of mammals of Northern Rhodesia, Chilanga, Zambia: Department of Tsetse Control. Google Scholar

37.

LarsonT. (1957) Small mammal collecting in Northern Rhodesia. Northern Rhodesia Journal 4: 339–341. Google Scholar

38.

LevickS. R.BaldeckC. A.AsnerG. P. (2015) Demographic legacies of fire history in an African savanna. Functional Ecology 29: 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12306Google Scholar

39.

LiangJ. J.CrowtherT. W.PicardN.WiserS.ZhouM.AlbertiG.ReichP. B. (2016) Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354: 196–209. Google Scholar

40.

LindstedtS. L.MillerB. J.BuskirkS. W. (1986) Home range, time, and body size in mammals. Ecology 67: 413–418. Google Scholar

41.

LomolinoM. V.PeraultD. R. (2007) Body size variation of mammals in a fragmented temperate rainforest. Conservation Biology 21: 1059–1069. Google Scholar

42.

MacFadyenD. N.AvenantN. L.van der MerweM.BredenkampG. J. (2012) The influence of fire on rodent abundance at the N’washitshumbe enclosure site, Kruger National Park, South Africa. African Zoology 47: 138–146. Google Scholar

43.

MossP. (1973) Notes on the interim fire use and fire control programme for the Kafue National Park, Chilanga, Zambia: National Parks and Wildlife Services. Google Scholar

44.

MwimaH. (2006) Vegetation monitoring manual for the Kafue National Park, Mumbwa: Zambia Wildlife Authority. Google Scholar

45.

Namukonde, N., Muleya, Z., & Ganzhorn, J. U. (in press). Small mammals in Kafue National Park: A review. Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Hamburg. Google Scholar

47.

National Parks and Wildlife Services /Japan International Cooperation Agency. (1999). General management plan for Kafue National Parks and its surrounding game management areas. Chilanga, Zambia: National Parks and Wildlife Services. Google Scholar

48.

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., & Wagner, H. (2015). Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.3-2. Retrieved from  http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan/Google Scholar

49.

OtienoD. O.K’OtutoG. O.JákliB.SchröttleP.MainaJ. N.JungE.OnyangoJ. C. (2011) Spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and productivity in a moist Kenyan savanna. Plant Ecology 212: 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9863-1Google Scholar

50.

ParrC. L.ChowanS. L. (2003) Burning issues for conservation: A critique of faunal fire research in Southern African. Austral Ecology 28: 384–395. Google Scholar

51.

PlavsicM. J. (2014) Proximate and ultimate drivers of small mammal recolonization after fire: Microvegetation type conditions, rainfall and species traits. Animal Conservation 17: 573–582. Google Scholar

52.

Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. (2002). Information sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS)—2009–2012 version. Retrieved from September 13, 2014,  http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htmGoogle Scholar

53.

Rowe-RoweD. T. (1995) Small mammal recolonization of a fire-exclusion catchment after unscheduled burning. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 25: 133–137. Google Scholar

54.

SalvatoriV.EgunyuF.SkidmoreA. K.de LeeuwJ.van GillsH. A. M. (2001) The effects of fire and grazing pressure on vegetation cover and small mammal populations in the Masai Mara National Reserve. African Journal of Ecology 39: 200–204. Google Scholar

55.

SimonsN. K.LewinsohnT.BluthgenN.BuscotF.BochS.DanielR.WeisserW. W. (2017) Contrasting effects of grassland management modes on species-abundance distributions of multiple groups. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 237: 143–153. Google Scholar

56.

SmitI. P. J.AsnerG. P.GovenderN.VaughnN. R.van WilgenB. W. (2016) An examination of the potential efficacy of high-intensity fires for reversing woody encroachment in savannas. Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 1623–1633. Google Scholar

57.

SocherS. A.PratiD.BochS.MullerJ.BaumbachH.GockelS.FischerM. (2013) Interacting effects of fertilization, mowing and grazing on plant species diversity of 1500 grasslands in Germany differ between regions. Basic and Applied Ecology 14: 126–136. Google Scholar

58.

SocherS. A.PratiD.BochS.MullerJ.KlausV. H.HolzelN.FischerM. (2012) Direct and productivity-mediated indirect effects of fertilization, mowing and grazing on grassland species richness. Journal of Ecology 100: 1391–1399. Google Scholar

59.

SrivastavaD. S.LawtonJ. H. (1998) Why more productive sites have more species: An experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities. American Naturalist 152: 510–529. Google Scholar

60.

StanleyW. T.GoodmanS. M. (2011a) Small mammal inventories in the East and West Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. 1. Study areas, methodologies and general results. Fieldiana 4: 1–17. Google Scholar

61.

StanleyW. T.GoodmanS. M. (2011b) Small mammal inventories in the East and West Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. 4. Rodentia. Fieldiana 4: 53–73. Google Scholar

62.

StanleyW. T.GoodmanS. M.HuttererR. (2011) Small mammal inventoried in the East and West Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. 2. Families Soricidae (Shrews and Macroscelididae (elephant shrews). Fieldiana 4: 18–23. Google Scholar

63.

StearnsS. S. (1992) The evolution of life histories, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

64.

SwanepoelC. M. (1981) The effect of fire on a small mammal community. South African Journal of Zoology 16: 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02541858.1981.11447761Google Scholar

65.

SwihartR. KSladeN. A.BergstormB. (1988) Relating body size to the rate of home range use in mammals. Ecology 69: 393–399. Google Scholar

66.

TimbukaC. D.KabigumilaJ. (2006) Diversity and abundance of small mammals In the Serengeti Kopjes, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Science 32: 1–12. Google Scholar

67.

ViolleC.NavasM.-L.VileD.KazakouE.FortunelC.HummelI.GarnierE. (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional!. Oikos 116: 882–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15559.xGoogle Scholar

68.

YarnellR. W.MetcalfeD. J.DunstoneN.BurnsideN.ScottD. M. (2008) The impact of fire on vegetation type use by the short-snouted elephant shrew (Elephantulus brachyrhynchus) in North West Province. African Zoology 43: 45–52. Google Scholar

69.

YarnellR. W.ScottD. M.ChimimbaC. T.MetacalfeD. J. (2007) Untangling the roles of fire, grazing and rainfall on small mammal communities in grassland ecosystems. Oecologia 154: 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0841-9Google Scholar

70.

Zambia Wildlife Authority (2005) Research and monitoring programme for Kafue National Park and adjacent Game Management Areas, Chilanga: Zambia Wildlife Authority. Google Scholar

71.

Zambia Wildlife Authority (2011) The General Management Plan for Kafue National Park and its surrounding game management areas, Chilanga: Zambia Wildlife Authority. Google Scholar

72.

Zambia Wildlife Authority (2013) Kafue National Park General Management Plan 2013-2023, Appendix 31, Chilanga: Zambia Wildlife Authority. Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2017 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Ngawo Namukonde, Daniel Kuebler, and Jörg U. Ganzhorn "Differential Effects of Fire on Small Mammal Communities in the Busanga Flood Plain, Zambia," Tropical Conservation Science 10(1), (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917725439
Received: 6 May 2017; Accepted: 18 July 2017; Published: 1 January 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top