How to translate text using browser tools
17 April 2025 Weather and Glufosinate Efficacy: A Retrospective Analysis Looking Forward to the Changing Climate
Christopher Landau, Kevin Bradley, Erin Burns, Ryan DeWerff, Anthony Dobbels, Alyssa Essman, Michael Flessner, Karla Gage, Aaron Hager, Amit Jhala, Paul O. Johnson, William Johnson, Sarah Lancaster, Dwight Lingenfelter, Mark Loux, Eric Miller, Micheal Owen, Debalin Sarangi, Peter Sikkema, Christy Sprague, Mark VanGessel, Rodrigo Werle, Bryan Young, Martin Williams II
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Foliar-applied postemergence applications of glufosinate are often applied to glufosinate-resistant crops to provide nonselective weed control without significant crop injury. Rainfall, air temperature, solar radiation, and relative humidity near the time of application have been reported to affect glufosinate efficacy. However, previous research may have not captured the full range of weather variability to which glufosinate may be exposed before or following application. Additionally, climate models suggest more extreme weather will become the norm, further expanding the weather range to which glufosinate can be exposed. The objective of this research was to quantify the probability of successful weed control (efficacy ≥85%) with glufosinate applied to some key weed species across a broad range of weather conditions. A database of >10,000 North American herbicide evaluation trials was used in this study. The database was filtered to include treatments with a single postemergence application of glufosinate applied to waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer], morningglory species (Ipomoea spp.), and/or giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.) <15 cm in height. These species were chosen because they are well represented in the database and listed as common and troublesome weed species in both corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Van Wychen 2020, 2022). Individual random forest models were created. Low rainfall (≤20 mm) over the 5 d before glufosinate application was detrimental to the probability of successful control of A. tuberculatus and S. faberi. Lower relative humidity (≤70%) and solar radiation (≤23 MJ m–1 d–1) on the day of application reduced the probability of successful weed control in most cases. Additionally, the probability of successful control decreased for all species when average air temperature over the first 5 d after application was ≤25 C. As climate continues to change and become more variable, the risk of unacceptable control of several common species with glufosinate is likely to increase.

Christopher Landau, Kevin Bradley, Erin Burns, Ryan DeWerff, Anthony Dobbels, Alyssa Essman, Michael Flessner, Karla Gage, Aaron Hager, Amit Jhala, Paul O. Johnson, William Johnson, Sarah Lancaster, Dwight Lingenfelter, Mark Loux, Eric Miller, Micheal Owen, Debalin Sarangi, Peter Sikkema, Christy Sprague, Mark VanGessel, Rodrigo Werle, Bryan Young, and Martin Williams II "Weather and Glufosinate Efficacy: A Retrospective Analysis Looking Forward to the Changing Climate," Weed Science 73(1), 1-7, (17 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.101
Received: 1 October 2024; Accepted: 14 December 2024; Published: 17 April 2025
KEYWORDS
climate change
herbicide efficacy
solar radiation
weather variability
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top