From late April to the second 10-day period of June 1994–1999, in 76 unmated males the time-budget was measured during 304 hours in a 6.6 km2 area of mature mixed and coniferous forests near Moscow. In 1999, territorial males were counted at least once per pentade throughout the breeding season in a 35 ha plot with 180 nest-boxes. Dark (grades 2–3 on Drost's scale) and pale (grades 5–7) males had similar levels of singing activity, but in cold weather the former had higher song rates than the latter. The singing activity of all the males was relatively low at the beginning of the season (by the mid-May). Dark males sang mainly from open perches (67.6% of songs, compared with 23.2% for pale males). In dark males visual stimulation compensated for the relatively low acoustic activity in early spring when trees were still lacking leaves. The immediate vicinities of nest-boxes occupied by dark males were visited by females significantly more frequently than those of pale ones.
R. V. Alatalo
,
C. Glynn
,
A. Lundberg
1990. Singing rate and female attraction in the Pied Flycatcher: an experiment. Anim. Behav. 39: 601–603. Google Scholar
R. V. Alatalo
,
A. Lundberg
,
C. Glynn
1986. Female Pied Flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323: 152–153. Google Scholar
S. Dale
,
T. Slagsvold
1994. Male pied flycatchers do not choose mates. Anim. Behav. 47: 1197–1205. Google Scholar
R. Drost
1936. Uber das Brutkleid mannlicher rauerfliegenfanger, Muscicapa hypoleuca.
Der Vogelzug 6: 179–186. Google Scholar
D. Eriksson
,
L. Wallin
1986. Male bird song attracts females — a field experiment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 297–299. Google Scholar
V. M. Gavrilov
,
A. B. Kerimov
,
E. V. Ivankina
1993. [Population and geographic variations in plumage colour and metabolic rate of males of different colour types in the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca)]. Doklady Academii Nauk 333: 807–810. Google Scholar
K. Gottlander
1987. Variation in the song rate of the male Fied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: causes and consequences. Anim. Behav. 38: 1037–1043. Google Scholar
V. G. Grinkov
1998. The colour variability of male breeding plumage. New model of maintenance of the phenotype population structure in the Pied Flycatcher. Bologna e Conservazione della Fauna 102: 192–199. Google Scholar
V. G. Grinkov
,
A. B. Kerimov
1998. Reproduction strategies and colour polymorphism in breeding plumage of male Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca, Muscicapidae, Passeriformes): probable mechanisms maintaining the phenotypic population structure. Russ. J. Zool. 2: 435–446. Google Scholar
E. V. Ivankina
,
T. A. Ilyina
,
A. B. Kerimov
1995. [Male plumage variability and the strategy of attracting a female: an evaluation of spatial organisation of the advertising behaviour in brightly and cryptically coloured Fied Flycatcher males (Ficedula hypoleuca, Passeriformes, Aves)]. Zhurnal obshchey biologii 56: 762–775. Google Scholar
T. Järvi
,
E. Røskaft
,
M. Bakken
,
B. Zumsteg
1987. Evolution of Variation in male secondary sexual characteristics. A test of eight hypotheses to Pied Flycatchers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 161–169. Google Scholar
A. B. Kerimov
,
E. V. Ivankina
,
T. A. Ilyina
,
V. M. Gavrilov
1994. [Dynamics of morphological and physiological correlates of dominance in the annual cycle of Great Tit (Parus major)]. Doklady Akademii Nauk 334: 249–252. Google Scholar
H. M. Lampe
,
Y. O. Espmark
1994. Song structure reflects male quality in Pied Flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim. Behav. 47: 869–876. Google Scholar
J. T. Lifjeld
,
T. Slagsvold
1988. Female Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca choose male characteristics in homogeneous habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 27–36. Google Scholar
R. L. Trivers
1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In:
B. Campbell (ed.).
Sexual selection and descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179. Google Scholar
V. G. Visotskiy
1989. [Age of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in the breeding season]. In:
R. L. Potapov (ed.).
[Faunistic and ecological studies of Eurasian birds]. Proc. Zool. Inst. USSR Acad. of Sci. 197: 49–52. Google Scholar
Acta Ornithologica
Vol. 36 • No. 1
July 2001
Vol. 36 • No. 1
July 2001
Ficedula hypoleuca
mating behaviour
Pied Flycatcher
singing activity
