Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2005 A Comparison of Common Breeding Bird Populations in Hamburg, Berlin and Warsaw
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Avifaunas of three large cities (Hamburg, Berlin and Warsaw) situated in the northern lowlands of Central Europe along an 850-km-long west-east line were compared. Estimates of several species' breeding populations in these cities were used to calculate their densities in the total area of breeding habitat in each city used by the species in question. The relationship of the densities of several common species was compared. Of 39 species analysed, 18 showed higher densities in Hamburg, 4 in Warsaw and 2 in Berlin. A gradient of increasing density from Warsaw to Berlin and Hamburg (Western gradient) was found for 16 species: Columba palumbus, Troglodytes troglodytes, Prunella modularis, Turdus merula, T. philomelos, T. viscivorus, Sylvia atricapilla, Phylloscopus collybita, Ph. trochilus, Regulus regulus, R. ignicapillus, Garrulus glandarius, Parus cristatus, Certhia brachydactyla, Fringilla coelebs, Pyrrhula pyrrhula. An opposite (Eastern) gradient was found for only 3 species: Columba livia f. domestica, Oriolus oriolus and Passer domesticus. Suggested causes for most of the larger differences among the three cities in the densities of particular species are the variation in the richness of vegetation (higher in both German cities) and differences in the stage of synurbization (i.e. adaptation to the urban environment) of specific avian species. In a few cases, factors such as the geographic range of a species, the attitude of humans (in the case of the Feral Pigeon), and specific, slight variations in habitat are put forward to explain the differences found.

REFERENCES

1.

W. Biaduń 2004. [Birds of Lublin]. Wyd. Akademii Medycznej, Lublin. Google Scholar

2.

W. Biaduń 2005. Lublin. In: J. G. Kelcey , G. Rheinwald (eds). Birds in European cities. Ginster Verl., St. Katharinen, pp. 171–196. Google Scholar

3.

J. Böhner , W. Schulz , K. Witt 2003. Bestand und lebensraumspezifische Dichten des Haussperlings in Berlin. Artenschutzreport (Sonderheft) 14: 13–17. Google Scholar

4.

P. Clergeau , J. Jokimäki , Savard , L. J.-P 2001. Are urban bird communities influenced by the bird diversity of adjacent landscapes? J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 1122–1134.  Google Scholar

5.

G. Degen , W. Otto 1988. Atlas der Brutvögel von Berlin. Naturschutzarbeit Berlin Brandenburg, Beiheft 8. Google Scholar

6.

M. Dinetti 1994. The urban ornithology in Italy. Memorabilia Zool. 49: 269–281. Google Scholar

7.

von Blotzheim U. Glutz , K. M. Bauer 1985–1997. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas Bd. 10–14. AULA, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar

8.

W. J. M. Hagemeijer , M. J. Blair (eds). 1997. The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds: their distribution and abundance. London. T&AD Poyser. Google Scholar

9.

J. Hewlett (ed.). 2002. The breeding birds of the London area. London. Google Scholar

10.

J. G. Kelcey , G. Rheinwald 2005. (eds). Birds in European cities. Ginster Verl., St. Katharinen. Google Scholar

11.

V. M. Konstantinov , W. Nowicki , A. G. Pichurin 1996. Recent changes in the avifauna of cities in European Russia and Eastern Poland — results of a questionnaire. Acta Ornithol. 31: 59–66. Google Scholar

12.

V. M. Konstantinov , R. Zakharov 2005. Moscow. In: J. G. Kelcey , G. Rheinwald 2005. (eds). Birds in European cities. Ginster Verl., St. Katharinen, pp. 197–214. Google Scholar

13.

M. Luniak 1990. Avifauna of cities in Central and Eastern Europe — results of the international inquiry. In: M. Luniak (ed.). Urban ecological studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Ossolineum, Wrocław, pp. 131–149. Google Scholar

14.

M. Luniak 2004. Synurbization — adaptation of animal wildlife to urban development. In: W. W. Shaw , L. K. Harris , L. VanDruff (eds). Urban wildlife conservation, Proc. 4th International Symp., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, pp. 50–55. Google Scholar

15.

M. Luniak 2005. Warsaw. In: J. G. Kelcey , G. Rheinwald (eds). Birdsin European cities. Ginster Verl., St. Katharinen, pp. 389–415. Google Scholar

16.

M. Luniak , P. Kozłowski , W. Nowicki , J. Plit 2001. [Birds of Warsaw 1962–2000]. Warszawa. Google Scholar

17.

M. Luniak , R. Mulsow , K. Walasz 1990. Urbanization of the European Blackbird — expansion and adaptation of urban population. In: M. Luniak (eds). Urban ecological studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Ossolineum, Wrocław, pp. 187–200. Google Scholar

18.

A. Mitschke , S. Baumung 2001. Brutvogel-Atlas Hamburg, Hamb. Avifaunist. Beitr. 31. Google Scholar

19.

A. Mitschke , R. Mulsow 2003. Düstere Aussichten für einen häufigen Stadtvogel — Vorkommen und Bestandsentwicklung des Haussperlings in Hamburg. Artenschutzreport, (Sonderheft) 14: 4–12. Google Scholar

20.

R. Mulsow 2005. Hamburg. In: J. G. Kelcey , G. Rheinwald (eds). Birds in European cities. Ginster Verl., St. Katharinen, pp. 127–151. Google Scholar

21.

Ornithol. AG Berlin (West) 1984. Brutvogelatlas Berlin (West). Ornithol. Ber. f.- Berlin (West) 9, Sonderheft. Google Scholar

22.

W. Otto , K. Witt 2002. Verbreitung und Bestand Berliner Brutvögel, Berl. Ornithol. Ber. 12, Sonderheft. Google Scholar

23.

J. Ptaszyk 2003. [Birds of Poznań — their qualitative and quantitative condition and its changes in the period 1850–2000]. Wyd. Naukowe UAM, Poznań. Google Scholar

24.

D. Rabosee 1995. Atlas des oiseaux nicheurs de Bruxelles 1989–1991. Soc. d'Etudes Ornithol. Aves. Liege. Google Scholar

25.

G. Reinwald 2005. Bonn. In: J. G. Kelcey, G. Rheinwald (eds). Birds in European cities. Ginster Verl., St. Katharinen, pp. 41–54. Google Scholar

26.

J. D. Summers-Smith 2003: Sparrows in the United Kingdom — decline and fall? Artenschutzreport (Sonderheft) 14: 17–20. Google Scholar

27.

L. Tomiałojć 1976. The urban population of the Wood Pigeon, Columba palumbus Linneaus 1758, in Europe — its origin, increase and distribution. Acta Zool. Cracov. 21: 585–631. Google Scholar

28.

A. Weiserbs , J.-E Jacob 2005. Brussels. In: J. G. Kelcey , G. Rheinwald (eds). Birds in European cities. Ginster Verl., St. Katharinen, pp. 81–101. Google Scholar

29.

K. Witt 1997. Halbquantitative Brutvogeldichten im 26 ha Gitternetz für 11000 ha o in Berlin mit Bezug zu Lebensraumtypen. Berl. Ornithol. Ber. 7: 119–204. Google Scholar

30.

K. Witt 2005. Berlin. In: J. G. Kelcey , G. Rheinwald (eds). Birds in European cities. Ginster Verl., St. Katharinen, pp. 17–39. Google Scholar
Klaus Witt, Alexander Mitschke, and Maciej Luniak "A Comparison of Common Breeding Bird Populations in Hamburg, Berlin and Warsaw," Acta Ornithologica 40(2), 139-146, (1 December 2005). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.040.0209
Received: 1 June 2005; Accepted: 1 November 2005; Published: 1 December 2005
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top