Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
29 December 2023 Hitching a ride on a scorpion: the first record of phoresy of a myrmecophile pseudoscorpion on a myrmecophile scorpion
Sharon Warburg, Yoram Zvik, Efrat Gavish-Regev
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

An observation of phoresy by pseudoscorpions on a scorpion host is recorded for the first time worldwide. Pseudoscorpions of the endemic species Nannowithius wahrmani (Beier, 1963) (Pseudoscorpiones: Withiidae) were observed phoretic on the endemic scorpion species Birulatus israelensis Lourenço, 2002 (Scorpiones: Buthidae) in Israel. Both are myrmecophiles of harvester ants of the genus Messor Forel, 1890.

Zum ersten Mal weltweit wurde Phoresie eines Pseudoskorpions auf einem Skorpion als Wirt festgestellt. In Israel wurden Pseudoskorpione der endemischen Art Nannowithius wahrmani (Beier, 1963) (Pseudoscorpiones: Withiidae) phoretisch auf der endemischen Skorpionart Birulatus israelensis Lourenço, 2002 (Scorpiones: Buthidae) beobachtet. Beide leben myrmekophil zusammen mit Ernteameisen aus der Gattung Messor Forel, 1890.

img-z1-7_34.jpg

Phoresy is a common symbiotic association among numerous species of pseudoscorpions that cling onto the host to disperse into new habitats (Poinar et al. 1998). Phoresy of pseudoscorpions has been recorded on mammals, birds, nine insect orders (Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Mecoptera, Odonata, Orthoptera and Plecoptera) and even on the arachnid orders harvestmen and spiders (Hetešová & Christophoryová 2022, Poinar et al. 1998). While pseudoscorpions usually grasp the host by their chela, on larger carriers they can ride without grasping, and the chelae can be used to feed on micro-arthropods, especially mites (Poinar et al. 1998). Phoresy has been documented in nine out of 25 contemporary pseudoscorpion families: Atemnidae, Cheiridiidae, Cheliferidae, Chernetidae, Garypinidae, Geogarypidae, Larcidae, Sternophoridae and Withiidae (Benavides et al. 2019, Harms & Dunlop 2017, Poinar et al. 1998, Xing et al. 2018).

The pseudoscorpion family Withiidae Chamberlin, 1931 comprising 37 genera and 170 species, is found in many regions of the world (WPC 2022). They are most abundant in tropical and sub-tropical biotopes and most diverse in Africa and South America showing strong biogeographic fidelity (Harvey 2015a). Most withiid species occur in leaf litter, under bark or under stones, but the genera Nannowithius Beier, 1932 and Termitowithius Muchmore, 1990 were considered inquilines with social insects (Harvey 2015b). Termitowithius species are reported to live with termites, while some Nannowithius species were found with ants (Harvey 2015b). In most species of Nannowithius eyes are absent, except two species with rudimentary eye spots, and this was suggested as a further indication to obligate occurrence with social insects (Harvey 2015b).

The genus Nannowithius comprises seven species (six are endemics) and its distribution extends from Pakistan through the Middle East to western Africa (WPC 2022).

Nannowithius wahrmani was known until recently from only two localities in Israel. The first specimens of N. wahrmani were collected in 1952 from a nest of the ant Messor semirufus (André, 1883) in its type locality Nahal Lavan in the Negev desert, in south-west Israel, and described as Myrmecowithius wahrmani Beier, 1963, whereas other specimens were found under a stone without recorded association with ants in Mt. Arbel near the Sea of Galilee, in north-east Israel (Beier 1963, Mahnert 1974). Nannowithius pakistanicus specimens were also found in nests of ants (Messor sp.) (Beier 1978), thus it is likely that all species of Nannowithius are associated with ants (Harvey 2015b).

Myrmecophily refers to various types of symbiotic associations of organisms with ant colonies and nests including mu-tualistic, commensal or parasitic interactions. This association was reported in at least 39 orders of arthropods, among them: pseudoscorpions, spiders, mites, millipedes, isopods and about a hundred families of insects (Rocha et al. 2020). Myrmecophily of pseudoscorpions has been reported for over 200 years (Wheeler 1911), with twenty-four records of associations with ant nests in eighteen species of sixteen genera and seven families of pseudoscorpions: Atemnidae, Cheiridiidae, Chernetidae, Chthoniidae, Ideoroncidae, Olpiidae and Withiidae (Martinez et al. 2021). As a result of the association with ants, pseudoscorpions gain a predator-free environment, while being richer in potential prey items and a sheltered stable environment with favourable temperature and humidity (Cole et al. 1994). They can hide in narrow inaccessible crevices to evade attack by ants, and possibly employ chemical mimicry of the surface cuticle (Červená et al. 2020). In many cases these interactions are restricted to a single ant host genus or species (Martinez et al. 2021).

The ant genus Messor is a species-rich genus spread in the Palearctic, Afrotropical, and Oriental regions, with 85 species and subspecies in the Mediterranean region (Salata & Borowiec 2019). In the genus Messor, workers are polymorphic, and many Mediterranean species that have been mistakenly proposed are actually synonyms of the same species representing various casts and morphs. Therefore, taxonomic revisions of the Messor species groups are necessary (Salata & Borowiec 2019).

In a recent study, myrmecophily was reported for the first time for a scorpion (Zvik 2017). Birulatus israelensis has been found in the Jordan Valley, in the eastern part of Israel, exclusively on active foraging trails of the ant species Messor ebeninus Santschi, 1927, or coming in and out of the nests many times, disregarded by the ants. When aggressive interactions did occur, they ended with no visible harm to the ants or the scorpions (Zvik 2022). The genus Birulatus Vachon, 1974, is found in Jordan, Israel and Syria, comprising four described species. It is characterized by a small body size, up to two cm long, and reduced lateral eyes, but only B. israelensis was studied for its ecology and biology and was reported as a myrmecophile (Lourenço et al. 2021, Zvik 2017).

Here we present the first record of a pseudoscorpion phoretic on a scorpion, while both are myrmecophiles of an ant species belonging to the genus Messor.

Methods

A thorough study of Birulatus israelensis has been conducted since 2016 by the second author (Zvik 2022). It included field surveys and specific nest monitoring every year between March–November, field observations, and video recordings in the vicinity of the ant nests between August–November. Surveys were performed in a semi-desert region along the eastern part of Israel from southern Golan and the Sea of Galilee in the north, to the Dead Sea area and Central Negev in the south. Monitoring started towards dusk and continued until midnight using UV torches, mainly in the vicinity of ant nests and along ant trails, but also in their surrounding area (Zvik 2022). While scorpions glow under UV light, these pseudoscorpions do not. This enabled their detection during night time as dark shades on the scorpion's glowing body. These scorpions were collected with the pseudoscorpions adhering to their dorsum or metasoma for laboratory identification using a Nikon SMZ25 motorized stereomicroscope and Beier's (1963) key for the pseudoscorpion fauna of Israel. The specimens are deposited at the Israel Arachnid National Natural History Collection (NNHC) at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJ).

Fig. 1.

a. The main study area in the northern part of the Jordan valley, where Birulatus israelensis and Nannowithius wahrmani were found; b-c. Nannowithius wahrmani phoretic on a Birulatus israelensis; d. Nannowithius wahrmani (Photo a. and c. by Y. Zvik, b. by S. Aharon, d. by S. Warburg)

img-z2-10_34.jpg

Results

Over a thousand observations of Birulatus israelensis were documented in hundreds of monitoring events during the seven years of the study. However, Nannowithius wahrmani pseudoscorpions were observed on only two dates, both in late spring, at two localities in the main study area in the northern part of the Jordan valley ca. 20 km south of Bet She'an: Givat Salit 32.3628°N, 35.5071°E and Rotem 32.3438°N, 35.5162°E, (Fig. 1a). On 7. May 2018 a single B. israelensis individual was collected with two pseudoscorpions on its dorsum. On 27. Apr. 2023 out of eleven B. israelensis specimens detected in one monitoring event, seven were collected with two to six pseudoscorpions on the scorpion's dorsum (Fig. 1b-d). Three of these scorpions were found on the same ant trail as in May 2018, and the rest were from three different ant nests. In captivity, after being collected, some of the pseudoscorpions remained on the scorpion's dorsum for over three weeks.

Discussion

It is unclear exactly when phoresy evolved in pseudoscorpions for the first time. It may have developed independently up to five times within the pseudoscorpions, yet, it is unlikely that the extinct fossil family Dracochelidae was phoretic (Harms & Dunlop 2017). However, withiid species were recorded from Baltic amber from the Eocene, 49 Ma ago, and are known to be phoretic as early as 16 Ma ago, from fossil evidence from the Miocene in Dominican amber, on ambrosia beetles (Harms & Dunlop 2017, Poinar et al. 1998).

We here describe the first record of phoresy of pseudoscorpions on a scorpion as a host. The pseudoscorpions were adhering to the scorpion's dorsum or metasoma presumably using their tarsal claws and arolia, and not grasping it with their pedipalpal chelae, which is common when the carrier is large, and not flying (Poinar et al. 1998). The most common way for a phoront and a host to make contact is when they occupy the same habitat and have the same activity and dispersal season (Poinar et al. 1998). Both the pseudoscorpion N. wahrmani and the scorpion B. israelensis are myrmecophilous generalist predators living in the same ant nests. Birulatus israelensis was recorded outside M. ebeninus nests, among the foraging ants and as aggregates in the upper chambers of the nest, usually two-three scorpions per chamber (Zvik 2022). It can feed on various prey items available inside the nest or around it, but based on laboratory experiments B. israelensis may favour ant larvae, when this food source is available and within reach. However, the scorpion was never observed to feed on mature ants (Zvik 2022). Nannowithius wahrmani is around one mm long and therefore it probably exploits a different ecological niche in the nest, and feeds on smaller prey such as soil mites and collembolans (Cole et al. 1994).

The co-evolution of a phoront and a host has probably developed over a long period of time creating an effective dispersal mechanism which is related to the phoront's survival strategy (Poinar et al. 1998). This co-evolution results in sophisticated capabilities of sensing the signal for dispersion and the cues of arrival. Nannowithius wahrmani pseudoscorpions were observed phoretically on B. israelensis scorpions walking along ant trails, both in 2018 and in 2023, at the same time of the year, during late spring. This is the season with high foraging activity of the Messor ants, and the observations reported here may suggest that late spring is also the dispersal season for both myrmecophilous species: B. israelensis and N. wahrmani. It is possible that the high foraging activity of the Messor ants during this season, which enables an easy deviation from the initial ant trail to an intersecting trail of a different ant nest, and thus dispersal to a new nest, triggers these myrmecophiles to disperse.

Another compelling indication supporting the hypothesis that this phoretic behaviour serves as a means of dispersal between ant nests, can be derived from the observation that certain pseudoscorpions persisted on the scorpion's dorsum for over three weeks. Additionally, in one case, four pseudoscorpions did not abandon a deceased scorpion, further implying that the pseudoscorpions were potentially awaiting a particular cue, possibly indicating the presence of a desirable habitat, before disengaging from their host scorpion. The cue may involve certain conditions that can be found within the nest chambers. The phoront and the host both being predators, with no observation of predation during that period, may also support the hypothesis that the purpose of this phoresy interaction is dispersal, rather than exploitation of the host by the phoront.

Over twenty pseudoscorpion species were documented from ant nests by Beier (1948), who suggested that the dispersal of the pseudoscorpions from nest to nest is performed by phoresy. While at least in two cases pseudoscorpions have been documented phoretic on Formicidae species, in South America and in Asia (Poinar et al. 1998), N. wahrmani pseudoscorpions were not observed phoretically on ants. We suggest several possible explanations: 1. It is harder to cling onto the fast-moving ant's smooth body. 2. The ant might easily notice the uninvited passenger and get rid of it or attack it. 3. Ants have chemical repellent that is avoided by the pseudoscorpions. 4. The scorpion can carry several individuals and do so for a long period, while ants' potential capacity is more limited. 5. An ant returns to its nest after foraging, while a dispersing scorpion can be exploited to get a ride to a different colony. Many questions arise for further research of the symbiotic interactions between these partners in the ant nest ecosystem and their coevolution. For instance: How do they elude the ants or are they recognized by them as nest mates? How do the pseudoscorpions disperse in absence of scorpions, and what are their alternative hosts? What is the signal for the scorpions and the pseudoscorpions to set out of the nest and disperse and, finally, what are the cues for the pseudoscorpions to get off the scorpion's back?

Acknowledgements

Sharon Warburg was supported by a fellowship from the National Natural History Collections, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and a US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (grant no. BSF-2019216 to P.P.S. and E.G.-R.). Yoram Zvik was supported by a National Geographic Grant to Dror Hawlena, Efrat Gavish-Regev and Yoram Zvik (NGS-51796R-18), an M.Sc. scholarship of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and a PhD scholarship of the University of Haifa. We are very grateful to Edna Zvik for her assistance in collecting the scorpions with the pseudoscorpions in the field, to Didi Amosi from Rotem and the residents of Givat Salit for their support in the field work; to Shlomi Aharon for the photograph and to Igor Armiach-Steinpress for his help. We also want to thank the reviewers M. Harvey and J. Christophoryová and the editor P. Dolejš for their helpful comments.

Author contribution

SW and YZ contributed equally to the manuscript. Conceptualization: YZ, SW and EG-R; investigation: YZ and SW; writing – original draft preparation: SW and YZ; writing – review and editing: EG-R, SW and YZ; funding acquisition: EG-R.

References

1.

Beier M 1948 Phoresie und phagophilie bei pseudoscorpionen. – Österreichische zoologische Zeitschrift 1: 441–497 Google Scholar

2.

Beier M 1963 Die Pseudoscorpioniden-fauna Israels und einiger angrenzender Gebiete. – Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 12: 183–212 Google Scholar

3.

Beier M 1978 Zwei neue orientalische Pseudoscorpione aus dem Basler Museum. – Entomologica Basiliensia 3: 231–234 Google Scholar

4.

Benavides LR, Cosgrove JG, Harvey MS & Giribet G 2019 Phylogenomic interrogation resolves the backbone of the Pseudoscorpiones tree of life. – Molecular phylogenetics and Evolution 139 (106509): 1–14 –  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.05.023 Google Scholar

5.

Červená M, Krajčovičová K & Christophoryová J 2020 Pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) in the nests of Formica ants in Slovakia. – Klapalekiana 56: 205–212 Google Scholar

6.

Cole DC, Elgar MA & Harvey MS 1994 Associations between Australian pseudoscorpions and ants. – Psyche 101: 221–227 –  https://doi.org/10.1155/1994/23982 Google Scholar

7.

Harms D & Dunlop JA 2017 The fossil history of pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones). – Fossil Record 20: 215–238 –  https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-20-215-2017 Google Scholar

8.

Harvey MS 2015a Revised diagnoses for the pseudoscorpion genera Metawithius and Microwithius, with the description of a new Australian genus, and notes on Withius (Pseudoscorpiones, Withiidae). – Journal of Arachnology 43: 353–370 –  https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202-43.3.353 Google Scholar

9.

Harvey MS 2015b A review of the taxonomy and biology of pseudoscorpions of Nannowithius and Termitowithius (Pseudoscorpiones,Withiidae),inquilines of social insects. – Journal of Arachnology 43: 342–352 –  https://doi.org/10.1636/arac-43-03-342-352 Google Scholar

10.

Hetešová E & Christophoryová J 2022 Recent data about pseudoscorpion (Pseudoscorpiones) phoresy from Slovakia with new host and phoront records. – Revista Ibérica de Aracnología 41: 37–40 Google Scholar

11.

Lourenço W, Mohammad AS, Afifeh B, Abu Baker M, Bader-Katbeh A & Amr Z 2021 New insights on the taxonomy of the genus Birulatus Vachon, 1974 and description of a new remarkable species from Jordan (Scorpiones, Buthidae). – Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 126: 123–132 Google Scholar

12.

Mahnert V 1974 Einige Pseudoskorpione aus Israel. – Revue suisse de Zoologie 81: 377–386 Google Scholar

13.

Martínez RJ, Guzmán GAV, Quirós DI & Emmen D 2021 Associated pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) with waste heaps of Atta colombica (Guérin-Méneville, 1844) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Panama. – Revista Chilena de Entomología 47: 67–74 –  https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.47.1.21.06 Google Scholar

14.

Poinar GO, Curcic BP & Cokendolpher JC 1998 Arthropod phoresy involving pseudoscorpions in the past and present. – Acta Arach-nologica 47: 79–96 –  https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.47.79 Google Scholar

15.

Rocha F, Lachaud JP & Pérez-Lachaud G 2020 Myrmecophilous organisms associated with colonies of the ponerine ant Neoponera villosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) nesting in Aechmea bracteata bromeliads: a biodiversity hotspot. – Myrmecological News 30: 73–92 –  https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_030:073 Google Scholar

16.

Salata S & Borowiec L 2019 Preliminary contributions toward a revision of Greek Messor Forel, 1890 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). – Turkish Journal of Zoology 43: 52–67 –  https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1809-41 Google Scholar

17.

Wheeler WM 1911 Pseudoscorpions in ant nests. – Psyche 18: 166–168 Google Scholar

18.

WPC World Pseudoscorpiones Catalog 2022 Natural History Museum Bern. – Internet:  https://wac.nmbe.ch/order/pseudoscorpiones/3(30. Jun. 2023) Google Scholar

19.

Xing L, Mckellar RC & Gao Z 2018 Cretaceous hitchhikers: a possible phoretic association between a pseudoscorpion and bird in Burmese Amber. – Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition) 92: 2434–2435 Google Scholar

20.

Zvik Y 2017 First record of myrmecophyly in the scorpion Birulatus israelensis (Scorpiones: Buthidae). – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 54: 21–23 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit5404 Google Scholar

21.

Zvik Y 2022 Ecological and taxonomic aspects of the enigmatic myrmecophile scorpion Birulatus israelensis (Arachnida: Scorpiones). – MSc Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. 59 pp. Google Scholar
Sharon Warburg, Yoram Zvik, and Efrat Gavish-Regev "Hitching a ride on a scorpion: the first record of phoresy of a myrmecophile pseudoscorpion on a myrmecophile scorpion," Arachnologische Mitteilungen: Arachnology Letters 66(1), 34-37, (29 December 2023). https://doi.org/10.30963/aramit6605
Received: 2 July 2023; Accepted: 10 December 2023; Published: 29 December 2023
KEYWORDS
Birulatus
Messor
myrmecophily
Nannowithius
Withiidae
Back to Top