Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
29 December 2023 On some rare and newly recorded spider species for the Ukrainian Carpathians (Arachnida: Araneae)
Anna Hirna, Vasyl Yanul
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This paper mentions six rare and understudied spider species from the Ukrainian Carpathian Mountains. Data on two species, Clubiona saxatilis L. Koch, 1867 and Erigone cristatopalpus Simon, 1884, also represent the first records for the Ukrainian fauna. This study also confirms the presence of Zelotes similis (Kulczyński, 1887), previously known from the Ukrainian Carpathians only through W. Kulczyński's file index – old unpublished records, stored at the Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw. Additionally, we provide supplementary data on the distribution and habitat preferences of Iberina montana (Blackwall, 1841), and Taranucnus beskidicus Hirna, 2018 in the Eastern Carpathians. In a separate note, the presence of Cetonana laticeps (Canestrini, 1868), an understudied element in the Ukrainian spider fauna, is mentioned and discussed. Over the last decades, this species has probably extended its range across the Transcarpathian Lowland of the Pannonian Plain and along the Vihorlat-Gutyn mountain ridge. The presented data on an urban record of Cetonana laticeps therefore provide insights into the dynamics and implications of its geographical expansion.

Diese Arbeit enthält Bemerkungen zu sechs seltenen und wenig erforschte Spinnenarten aus den Ukrainischen Karparten. Daten zu zwei Arten, Clubiona saxatilis L. Koch, 1867 and Erigone cristatopalpus Simon, 1884, stellen den Erstnachweis für die Ukrainische Fauna da. Diese Studie bestätigt zudem die Präsenz von Zelotes similis (Kulczyński, 1887), welche bisher in den ukrainischen Karpaten nur durch das Karteikartensystem alter, unpublizierter Nachweise von W. Kulczyński bekannt und am Zoologischen Institut der Polnischen Akademie für Wissenschaft in Warschau hinterlegt ist. Ergänzende Daten zur Verbreitung und Habitpräferenz von Iberina montana (Blackwall, 1841) und Taranucnus beskidicus Hirna, 2018 in den Östlichen Karpaten werden ebenfalls präsentiert. Eine separate Notiz betrifft die Präsenz von Cetonana laticeps (Canestrini, 1868), ein wenig erforschtes Element der ukrainischen Fauna. Die Art erweiterte ihr Verbreitungsgebiet wahrscheinlich über die letzten Jahrzehnte in die transkarpatische Ebene Pannoniens und entlang der Vihorlat-Gutin-Gebirgskette. Die präsentierten Daten zu einem urbanen Nachweis von Cetonana laticeps stellen daher weitere Erkenntnisse zur Dynamik und Auswirkung der Expansion des Verbreitungsareals dieser Art dar.

У poбoтi згaдyютьcя шicть piдкicниx i мaлoвивчeниx видiв пaвyкiв Укpaїнcькиx Кapпaт. Дaнi пpo двa види, Clubiona saxatilis L. Koch, 1867 тa Erigone cristatopalpus Simon, 1884, peпpeзeнтyють пepшi їx знaxiдки для фayни Укpaїни. Дocлiджeння тaкoж пiдтвepджyє нaявнicть Zelotes similis (Kulczyński, 1887), вiдoмoгo paнiшe для Укpaїнcькиx Кapпaтax лишe зa кapтoтeкoю B. Кyльчинcькoгo – cтapими нeoпyблiкoвaними зaпиcaми, якi збepiгaютьcя в Myзeї тa Iнcтитyтi зooлoгiї Пoльcькoї aкaдeмiї нayк y Bapшaвi. Haвeдeнi дoдaткoвi дaнi щoдo poзпoвcюджeння тa oceлищниx пpeфepeнцiй Iberina montana (Blackwall, 1841) тa Taranucnus beskidicus Hirna, 2018 y Cxiдниx Кapпaтax. Oкpeмo вapтo вiдзнaчити знaxiдкy Cetonana laticeps (Canestrini, 1868) – мaлoзнaнoгo eлeмeнтa y фayнi Укpaїни. Пpoтягoм ocтaннix дecятилiть цeй вид, ймoвipнo, poзшиpює cвiй apeaл yздoвж Пaннoнcькoї piвнини тa Bигopлaт-Гyтинcькoгo xpeбтa. Haвeдeнi дaнi пpo знaxiдкy Cetonana laticeps в ypбaнiзoвaнoмy лaндшaфтi cпpиятимyть пoдaльшoмy poзyмiнню динaмiки тa нacлiдкiв йoгo eкcпaнciї.

The comprehensive “Spiders of Europe” database lists 1094 spider species from Ukraine (Nentwig et al. 2023). Meanwhile, the most recent checklist for spiders recorded in the Ukrainian Carpathians, established in 2014, includes 386 species (Gajdoš et al. 2014). However, these numbers are notably incomplete as wide expanses of distribution within the country, including the mountainous regions, remain largely unexplored. One of the problems hampering the creation of a comprehensive faunal inventory of the Ukrainian Carpathians pertains to old publications that fail to clearly define species´ localities, leaving it even ambiguous whether the samples were procured specifically within the mountainous region or from the neighbouring flatlands. Regrettably, in many cases the voucher material related to these papers has not been preserved, also a significant number of species remain unconfirmed by contemporary records.

This paper reports on the occurrence and habitat preferences of six rare and faunistically remarkable spider species discovered in the Ukrainian Carpathians, including data on four species absent from “The Spiders of Europe” database for Ukraine (Nentwig et al. 2023). Two of these species are new to the Ukrainian fauna, and four were previously known only from rarely cited regional faunal lists, an unpublished thesis, or the type locality.

Material and methods

The material (2016–2022) was collected by standard methods, mostly hand collection and pitfall trapping, from different regions within the Ukrainian Carpathians. Precise locations for each species are explained in the Results section and highlighted on the associated map. Specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol. Isolated male palps were dissected and cleared (via 10% KOH, maceration at ambient temperature for 24 hours), epigynes/vulvas were examined and photographed using a Nikon Coolpix 4500 camera attached to a Zeiss Stemi 2000 Stereo Microscope (Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians, NAS of Ukraine, Lviv). All measurements were conducted using a stereomicroscope fitted with an ocular micrometer. Adobe Photoshop software (version 23.5.0) was employed to generate scale lines.Taxonomic names follow the nomenclature of the WSC (2023). Material is deposited in the collections of the Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians NAS of Ukraine (Lviv).

Results and discussion

Clubiona saxatilis L. Koch, 1867 (Clubionidae) (Fig. 1)

  • Material examined. UKRAINE, Zakarpatska oblast, Uzhanskyi National Nature Park, vil. Stuzhytsia, Stinka mountain ridge, beech-dominated tree line: an ecotone between a pristine sycamore-beech forest on rocky outcrops and mountain meadow, 49.0036°N, 22.5536°E; 925–960 m a.s.l., pitfall trap, 30. May – 21. Jun. 2018: 1 ♂; mountain meadow with patches of dwarf Vaccinium heath, 49.0050°N, 22.5556°E; 945–965 m a.s.l., pitfall trap, 13. Aug. – 24. Oct. 2019: 1 ♂, leg. N. Koval, det. A. Hirna (Fig. 2).

  • Distribution. The presence of Clubiona saxatilis has been confirmed in Western Europe (including France, Germany, Austria), Eastern Europe (Czechia, Slovakia, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria), and Southern Europe (Italy, Serbia, Montenegro, Nentwig et al. 2023). This paper introduces the first record of Clubiona saxatilis in Ukraine.

  • Remarks. Except for Bulgaria and Slovakia, Clubiona saxatilis has been found in a limited number of localities across most countries, rendering it a relatively rare species (Deltshev & Blagoev 1997, Gajdoš et al. 1999, Deltshev et al. 2012, Rozwałka & Stachowicz 2015). The species is typically found in low to mid-altitude mountain ranges, foothills, and hills, at altitudes spanning from 300 to 1500 m a.s.l. It inhabits a diverse range of ecosystems, from forests and grasslands to pastures, and is often discovered in rocky outcrops and scree slopes (Thaler 1981, Franc 2002, Rozwałka & Stachowicz 2015, Růžička et al. 2005, Růžička & Řezáč 2022).

  • Within the Carpathian region, Clubiona saxatilis has only been reported from two countries, namely Czechia and Slovakia. One of the locations for the species (Slovakia; Poloniny National Park: National Nature Reserve Stinska, Majkova, 960–1040 m a.s.l.) is located within the East Carpathian Biosphere Reserve (Svatoň et al. 2003). This transboundary protected area also encompasses the Uzhanskyi National Nature Park, where the species was subsequently discovered in Ukraine. Overall, Clubiona saxatilis is categorized as near-threatened (NT) in the Carpathian Red List (Gajdoš et al. 2014), with a status of least concern (LC) in Slovakia (Gajdoš et al. 1999), whereas in Czechia, the species is endangered (EN; Řezáč et al. 2015).

  • Fig. 1.

    Male palp of Clubiona saxatilis from the Ukrainian Carpathians. a. ventral view; b. retrolateral view. Scale bar: 0.2 mm

    img-z2-2_38.jpg

    Zelotes similis (Kulczyński, 1887) (Gnaphosidae) (Fig. 3)

  • Material examined. UKRAINE, Ivano-Frankivsk oblast, Syniohora National Natural Park, Syvula mountain ridge, Mt. Mala Syvula (Gorgany mt. massif), siliceous screes at the subalpine level, 48.5449°N 24.1291°E; 1795 m a.s.l., hand-collected under stones, 21. Jul. 2022: 1 ♀, leg. et det. A. Hirna (Fig. 2).

  • Distribution. The species occurs in the Alps of Central Europe and is widespread in the mountainous eastern regions of Southern Europe, extending eastward to Bulgaria. It is also known in Romania and found in the Asian part of Türkiye (Grimm 1985, Nentwig et al. 2023).

  • Remarks. Zelotes similis was described by W. Kulczyński as Prosthesima similis from the Tyrolean Alps (Kulczyński 1887). Later, in 1897, this species was reported by him near Băile Herculane, a city in Romania within the Southern Carpathians (Herkulesfürdő; Chyzer & Kulczyński 1897). Władysław Kulczyński had a large card index in which he made notes regarding species he identified. Nonetheless, a substantial part of this data remains unpublished (Hirna & Zhukovets 2022), including the information from around 1900 concerning Zelotes similis in the Eastern Carpathians, specifically within the Chornohora mountain massif in Ukraine. Therefore, it is not listed in Nentwig et al. (2023) for the Ukraine. There is also a note on Zelotes similis from the Eastern Carpathians of Romania (Iacobeni, formerly known as Kászonfürdő), a record from a paper by Kolosváry and Loksa (1944: as Zelotes similis hungaricus). Since 1944, there have been no further reports of this species in the regions of the mountain system, and it was conspicuously absent from the Carpathians' Red List (Gajdoš et al. 2014; perhaps as doubtful).

  • In Europe, Zelotes similis is typically found on warm, stony slopes with dwarf shrub heath, and in sparsely vegetated woodlands (primarily up to 1500 m, although some specimens have been recorded higher, even exceeding 2100 m; Grimm 1985, Pantini et al. 2020, Nentwig et al. 2023). Its recent discovery within the Gorgany mountain massif of Ukraine aligns with its known habitat preferences. At the same time, the old record based on the material of Stanislaw Pilawski (1934–1957) from the plain part of Ukraine (Lviv: Briukhovychi, pine forest, 1 ♀; Woźny & Czajka 1993) remains doubtful (Hirna & Zhukovets 2022). The confirmation of Zelotes similis in the Eastern Carpathians underscores the necessity for a comprehensive review of materials from this region, especially given the marked morphological similarities between this species and Zelotes subterraneus (C. L. Koch, 1833) or Zelotes clivicola (L. Koch, 1870).

  • Fig. 2.

    Localities of species in the Ukrainian Carpathians: Clu sax – Clubiona saxatilis, Eri cri – Erigone cristatopalpus, Zel sim – Zelotes similis, Ibe mon – Iberina montana, Tar bes – Taranucnus bescidicus, Cet lat – Cetonana laticeps

    img-z2-6_38.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Female of Zelotes similis from the Ukrainian Carpathians. a. a dissected end cleared vulva, dorsal view; b. dissected end cleared epigyne/ vulva, ventral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm

    img-z3-2_38.jpg

    Iberina montana (Blackwall, 1841) (Hahniidae) (Fig. 4)

  • Material examined. UKRAINE, Zakarpatska oblast, vil. Kolochava, the Tapesh mountain ridge, an old felled area with patches of siliceous screes on the southeast slope, 48.4205°N 23.6877°E, 600 m a.s.l., in leaf litter between stones, collected by hand, 27. Apr. 2014: 1 ♀; Ust-Chorna village, Polonyna Krasna mountain ridge, recently felled area with patches of siliceous screes on the south slope, 48.2883°N, 23.9544°E, 600 m a.s.l., in leaf litter between stones, collected by hand, 1. Oct. 2018: 2 ♀♀, leg. et det. A. Hirna (Fig. 2).

  • Distribution. Iberina montana is predominantly found in Europe, extending eastwards into Western European Russia and Romania. This species has also been recorded in the Asian part of Türkiye (Nentwig et al. 2023).

  • Remarks. This species poses considerable challenges to its accurate identification due to its morphological similarity to I. difficilis (Harm, 1966): their palpal structures are nearly indistinguishable, so only material containing females can be considered (Růžička 2022). Although Iberina montana has a wide geographical range across Europe, it remains a rare find in the Carpathian Mountains and is currently categorized as ‘vulnerable’ on the Red Carpathian List (VU; Gajdoš et al. 2014). In the Western Carpathians, this species has been known from the Tatra Mountains since Kulczyński (1882) described specimens from this region as Hahnia parva. Only recently was it possible to confirm the record of Iberina montana in these mountains in Poland (on a rocky slope with mountain pine, 1650 m a.s.l.; Wiśniewski et al. 2013). Furthermore, the species has been observed in several locations within the Fatra-Tatra Area in Slovakia, predominantly in forest ecosystems.

  • In the Eastern Carpathians, specimens of Iberina montana have been located in Slovakia's Bukovec Mountains near the borders with Poland and Ukraine (Gajdoš et al. 1999, Svatoň & Kovalčík 2006). In Ukraine, the species has been documented within mixed forests in the Gorgany mountain massif (650–900 m a.s.l.), and also in the old-growth beech forests of the Uholsko-Shyrokoluzhanskyi massif (511–821 m a.s.l.; Prokopenko & Chumak 2007). These habitats align with the typical environments known for this species (Růžička 2022, Nentwig et al. 2023). Therefore, the discovery of Iberina montana specimens within deforested areas featuring patches of siliceous screes on south-facing slopes was unexpected. These records enhance our understanding of the ecological preferences of Iberina montana and prompt revisions of the existing data on potential threats to this species within the Carpathians.

  • Fig. 4.

    Female of Iberina montana from the Ukrainian Carpathians. a. general appearance, with epigyne, ventral view; b. dissected end cleared vulva. Scale bars: 0.1 mm

    img-z3-8_38.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Male palp of Erigone cristatopalpus from the Ukrainian Carpathians. a. ventral view; b. retrolateral view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm

    img-z4-1_38.jpg

    Erigone cristatopalpus Simon, 1884 (Linyphiidae) (Fig. 5)

  • Material examined. UKRAINE, Zakarpatska oblast, the Svydivets mountain massif, Troyaska f. n., raised bog and a mountain stream (empties into Apshynets Lake) at the bottom of the glacial cirque, 48.2811°N 24.1544°E, 1507 m a.s.l., in Sphagnum, collected by hand, 10. Aug. 2016: 1 ♂, leg. et det. A. Hirna (Fig. 2).

  • Distribution. Erigone cristatopalpus is a species native to both the Palaearctic and Nearctic regions. Within the Palaearctic, the species has a disjunct range that covers Europe in the west and Kazakhstan, Russia (from the Urals to the Far East), and Mongolia in the east (Nentwig et al. 2023). Our recent record of Erigone cristatopalpus in Ukraine is its easternmost presence in Europe.

  • Remarks. In Europe, Erigone cristatopalpus is restricted in distribution to the high-altitude mountain ranges, namely the Alps (Muster & Hänggi 2009), Carpathians (Tatras, Slovakia; Svatoň & Kovalčík 2006), and Sudetes (the Giant Mountains in Poland and Hrubý Jeseník Mountains in Czechia; Wiśniewski & Wesołowska 2016, Řezáč et al. 2021). The species' vertical distribution spans from the subalpine to the alpine zones, ranging approximately from 1300 to 2900 m a.s.l.

  • It predominantly resides in moist habitats (Muster & Hänggi 2009, Wiśniewski & Wesołowska 2016), a fact substantiated also by our recent observation from the Svydivets mountain massif in Ukraine. According to the Carpathian Red List (Gajdoš et al. 2014), Erigone cristatopalpus is currently classified as an endangered species (EN).

  • Taranucnus beskidicus Hirna, 2018 (Linyphiidae)

  • Material examined. Ukraine, Zakarpatska oblast, Ust-Chorna village, Polonyna Krasna mountain ridge, recently felled area with patches of siliceous screes on the south slope, 48.2883°N 23.9544°E, 600 m a.s.l., under stones, collected by hand, 1. Oct. 2018: 1 ♂, leg. et det. A. Hirna (Fig. 2).

  • Distribution. Ukraine (the Carpathians; Nentwig et al. 2023).

  • Remarks. Taranucnus beskidicus is a little-known species, only recently described. It is the second record of this species from Ukraine, the other being the type locality in the Skole Beskids National Nature Park (Hirna 2018).The habitat where the specimen was located in the Polonyna Krasna mountain ridge diverges from the original habitat description, which included non-vegetated deposit beds of mountain streams in fir-beech forest, formed of gravels, boulders, and finer sediments bordering the shores of the stream and forming stream islands (Hirna 2018). The record of specimens within the siliceous screes on south-facing slopes suggests the species' adaptability to a relatively wide range of soil and air moisture conditions.

  • Cetonana laticeps (Canestrini, 1868) (Trachelidae) (Fig. 6)

  • Material examined. UKRAINE, Zakarpatska oblast, Irschava city, inside a building, 48.3082°N, 23.0412°E, 132 m a.s.l., collected by hand, 24. Mar. 2022: 1 ♀, leg. et det. V. Yanul (Fig. 2).

  • Comparative material (examined per image). Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Karlsruhe, under bark of a dead willow tree along the river Alb in an urban area, 48.9886°N, 8.3998°E, collected by hand, 22. Mar. 2023, 1 ♀, leg et det. T. Bauer.

  • Distribution. This species is known from most Southern European countries (Spain, Italy, Serbia, Montenegro, Albania and North Macedonia). In Western Europe, it is known from all countries except for the Netherlands, with the northernmost known location being Aken (Elbe) in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. Eastern Europe is also part of its range, encompassing Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Czechia and Slovakia, with its northernmost boundary being Lublin in Poland (Nentwig et al. 2023, Arachnologische Gesellschaft 2023, Rozwałka 2012). Additionally, Cetonana laticeps has been recently recorded in the Asian region of Türkiye (Coşar 2021, Nentwig et al. 2023). According to Rozwałka (2012), “Grimm's (1986) information about the occurrence of C. laticeps in Russia was based on a misinterpretation of Tyshchenko's (1971) data, who described this species from Hungary and not from the area of the former USSR”.

  • Remarks. Cetonana laticeps was first found in Ukraine in 2009, and again in 2016, in the city of Uzhhorod during a study on synanthropic spiders in the country's regional centres (Voloshyn 2018). Most of the territory of Uzhhorod is located within the Transcarpathian Lowland of the Pannonian Plain. Currently, the species was discovered within the Irshava foothills of the Vihorlat-Gutyn mountain ridge. Currently, there is no information available about the altitudinal distribution of this species in the Carpathians, leaving it uncertain whether the mountain ranges will impede its northeastern expansion.

  • An eastward spread of the species in the western regions of Ukraine could occur from the plains of Poland, particularly from Lublin where the species was recorded over a decade ago (Rozwałka 2012). To date, Cetonana laticeps has only been found sporadically within urban ecosystems of the Transcarpathian region, on external walls and indoors. Being a bark dweller that has been collected from various tree species (Grimm 1986; see material), it remains unclear if Cetonana laticeps populates natural habitats in this region as no systematic studies have been conducted within the Transcarpathian Plain and Volcanic Carpathians in recent decades. The species very likely inhabits crevices under the bark of urban trees in Ukraine and searching old orchard fruit and pine trees will probably reveal additional records in urban ecosystems and their vicinity (Arachnologische Gesellschaft 2023, Grimm 1986, T. Bauer pers. comm.). The species was not included in the list of synanthropic spiders of the Carpathian Basin Countries, even though it is known to exist here in Romania and Slovakia (Gajdoš et al. 2014, Szinetár et al. 2020).

  • Fig. 6.

    Females of Cetonana laticeps from the Ukrainian Carpathians (a, b) and Germany (c). a. epigyne; b. general appearance; c. adult specimen ( https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152067938). Scale bars: 0.2 mm (a); 1 mm (b)

    img-z4-10_38.jpg

    Further remarks

    Considering the aforementioned data, we can surmise that the number of records for certain species such as Clubiona saxatilis, Iberina montana and Taranucnus beskidicus is likely to increase when research expands to cover more of the Carpathian region. Given the morphological similarity between Zelotes similis and some other species of the genus, especially Zelotes subterraneus (C. L. Koch, 1833) or Zelotes clivicola (L. Koch, 1870), reviewing existing material on these species and gathering new data on their distribution within the Eastern Carpathians is imperative. Erigone cristatopalpus, an endangered species, inhabits oligotrophic Sphagnum bogs in high-altitude zones – a habitat particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbances and transformation due to climate change. In the Ukrainian Carpathians, this type of habitat is decreasing in the subalpine zone due to shrub encroachment and substrate desiccation. Finally, the urban record of Cetonana laticeps is important for understanding the mechanisms driving this species' expansion into new territories.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are especially grateful to Nela Koval (Uzhanskyi National Nature Park, Ukraine) for collecting the specimens of Clubiona saxatilis, Iryna Rabyk (Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians, NAS of Ukraine, Lviv) for her help with the photographs, and Dominika Mierzwa-Szymkowiak (Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw) for her help in processing card index and materials of W. Kulczyński. We also thank Andre Lomov (USA) for linguistic help. An anonymous reviewer as well as V. Růžička, A. Stäubli, P. Dolejš and T. Bauer are thanked for valuable comments and remarks on the manuscript.

    References

    1.

    Arachnologische Gesellschaft 2023: Atlas of the European Arachnids. – Internet:  https://atlas.arages.de (12. May 2023) Google Scholar

    2.

    Chyzer C & Kulczyński W 1897 Araneae Hungariae. Tomus II. Academia Scientarum Hungaricae, Budapest. pp. 145–370 Google Scholar

    3.

    Coşar İ 2021 One new genus record for spider fauna of Turkey (Araneae: Trachelidae). – Munis Entomology and Zoology 16: 962–965 Google Scholar

    4.

    Deltshev C & Blagoev G 1997 The spiders of Pirin Mountain (Bulgaria). Taxonomic, faunistic and zoogeographical analysis (Araneae). – Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlich-Medizinischen Vereins in Innsbruck 84: 269–286 Google Scholar

    5.

    Deltshev C, Lazarov S, Blagoev G & Naumova M 2012 Spiders (Araneae) from the Western Rhodopes Mts (Bulgaria). In: Beron P (ed.) Biodiversity of Bulgaria 4. Biodiversity of Western Rhodopes (Bulgaria and Greece) II. Pensoft, Sofia. pp. 63–103 Google Scholar

    6.

    Franc V 2002 Contribution to the knowledge on spiders (Araneae) of the Veľká Fatra Mts. – Matthias Belius University proceedings, Suppl. 2: 155–163 Google Scholar

    7.

    Gajdoš P, Moscaliuc LA, Rozwalka R, Hirna A, Majkus Z, Gubányi A, Heltai MG, Svatoň J 2014 Red list of spiders (Araneae) of the Carpathian Mts. In: Kadlečík J (ed.) Carpathian red list of forest habitats and species. Carpathian list of invasive alien species (draft). The State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Banská Bystrica. pp. 118–171 Google Scholar

    8.

    Gajdoš P, Svatoň J & Sloboda J 1999 Katalóg pavúkov Slovenska. Catalogue of Slovakian spiders. Ústav krajinnej ekológie Slovenskej akadémie vied, Bratislava, 339 & 316 pp. [in Slovak and English] Google Scholar

    9.

    Grimm U 1985 Die Gnaphosidae Mitteleuropas (Arachnida, Araneae). – Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg (NF) 26: 1–318 Google Scholar

    10.

    Grimm U 1986 Die Clubionidae Mitteleuropas: Corinninae und Liocraninae (Arachnida, Araneae). – Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg (NF) 27: 1–91 Google Scholar

    11.

    Hirna A 2018 A new species and new records of the spider genus Taranucnus (Araneae, Linyphiidae) from the Ukrainian Carpathians. – Zootaxa 4429: 372–378 –  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4429.2.11 Google Scholar

    12.

    Hirna A & Zhukovets E 2022 Catalogue of spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of the Lviv oblast (Ukraine). Lviv. 312 pp. Google Scholar

    13.

    Kolosváry G & Loksa I 1944 Beitrag zur Spinnenfauna Siebenbürgens. – Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, Fauna Hungarica 1: 11–28 Google Scholar

    14.

    Kulczyński W 1882 Opisy nowych gatunków pająków z Tatr, Babiej góry i Karpat szlązkich [Descriptions of the new spider species from Tatra Mts., Babia Góra Mt. and Silesian Carpathian Mts.]. – Pamiętniki Akademii Umiejętności w Krakowie. Wydział Matematyczno-Przyrodniczy 8: 1–42 [in Polish] Google Scholar

    15.

    Kulczyński W 1887 Przyczynek do tyrolskiej fauny pajęczaków[A contribution to the arachnid fauna of Tyrol]. – Rozprawy i Sprawozdania z Posiedzen Wydzialu Matematyczno Przyrodniczego Akademji Umiejętności, Krakow 16: 245–356 [in Polish] Google Scholar

    16.

    Muster C & Hänggi A 2009 The Erigone psychrophila group in the Alps (Araneae: Linyphiidae). – Contributions to Natural History 12: 987–1005 Google Scholar

    17.

    Nentwig W, Blick T, Bosmans R, Gloor D, Hänggi A & Kropf C 2023 Spiders of Europe. Version 5.2023. –  https://www.araneae.nmbe.ch https://doi.org/10.24436/1 Google Scholar

    18.

    Pantini P, Mazzoleni F, Gobbi M & Pedrotti L 2020 Ragni (Arachnida, Araneae) di interesse biogeografico e conservazionistico nel Parco Nazionale dello Stelvio (Italia). – Rivista del Museo civico di Scienze Naturali “E. Caffi”, Bergamo 33: 23–53 Google Scholar

    19.

    Prokopenko EV & Chumak VA 2007 An annotated list of the spiders (Araneae) of the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve and the Carpathian National Nature Park. – The Kharkov Entomological Society Gazette: 14: 201–218 Google Scholar

    20.

    Řezáč M, Kůrka A, Růžička V & Heneberg P 2015 Red List of Czech spiders: 3rd edition, adjusted according to evidence-based national conservation priorities. – Biologia (Bratislava) 70: 645–666 –  https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0079 Google Scholar

    21.

    Řezáč M, Růžička V, Hula V, Dolanský J, Machač O & Roušar A 2021 Spiders newly observed in Czechia in recent years – overlooked or invasive species? – BioInvasions Records 10: 555–566 –  https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2021.10.3.05 Google Scholar

    22.

    Rozwałka R 2012 Cetonana laticeps (Canestrini, 1868) (Araneae: Corinnidae) – a new species of spider to the fauna of Poland. – Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Acta Biologica 19: 77–82 Google Scholar

    23.

    Rozwałka R & Stachowicz J 2015 The first record of Clubiona saxatilis C. L. Koch, 1867 (Araneae: Clubionidae) in Poland. – Fragmenta Faunistica 58: 59–63 –  https://doi.org/10.3161/00159301FF2015.58.1.059 Google Scholar

    24.

    Růžička V 2022 A review of the spider genus Iberina (Araneae, Hahniidae). – Zootaxa 5133: 555–566 –  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.6 Google Scholar

    25.

    Růžička V, Kůrka A, Buchar J & Řezáč M 2005 Czech Republic – the type material of spiders (Araneae). – Časopis Národního muzea, Řada přírodovědná 174: 13–64 Google Scholar

    26.

    Svatoň J & Kovalčík R 2006 Present state of knowledge of araneofauna in the Tatras National Park. – Oecologia Montana 15: 1–14 Google Scholar

    27.

    Svatoň J, Thomka V & Gajdoš P 2003: Pavúky – Araneae. In: Mašán P & Svatoň J (eds) Pavúkovce národného parku Poloniny. Banská Bystrica. pp. 21–113 Google Scholar

    28.

    Szinetár C, Kovács G, Urák I & Gajdos P 2020 Synanthropic spider fauna of the Carpathian Basin in the last three decades. – Biologia Futura 71: 31–38 –  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-020-00009-5 Google Scholar

    29.

    Thaler K 1981 Bemerkenswerte Spinnenfunde in Nordtirol (Österreich) (Arachnida: Aranei). – Veröffentlichungen des Museum Ferdinandeum in Innsbruck 61: 105–150 Google Scholar

    30.

    Tyshchenko VP 1971 [Classification key of Aranei of the European part of the USSR. Keys of the fauna of the USSR 105]. Nauka, Leningrad. 282 pp. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    31.

    Voloshyn VL 2018 [Determining factors of the synanthropic spider assemblages' structure of the Carpathian region urboecosystems]. PhD thesis, Chernivtsi. 186 pp. [in Ukrainian] Google Scholar

    32.

    Wiśniewski K, Rozwałka R & Wesołowska W 2013 The first record of Hahnia difficilis Harm, 1966 (Araneae, Hahniidae) in Poland. – Fragmenta Faunistica 56: 55–63 –  https://doi.org/10.3161/00159301FF2013.56.1.055 Google Scholar

    33.

    Wiśniewski K & Wesołowska W 2016 Rare spider species (Araneae) from the Giant Mountains and the Izera Mountains – new records for the fauna of Poland. – Fragmenta Faunistica 59: 115–120 –  https://doi.org/10.3161/00159301FF2016.59.2.115 Google Scholar

    34.

    World Spider Catalog 2023. World spider catalog. Version 24.5. Natural History Museum Bern.  http://wsc.nmbe.ch https://doi.org/10.24436/2 Google Scholar

    35.

    Woźny M & Czajka M 1993 Pająki (Aranei) Lwowa i jego okolic [Spiders (Aranei) of Lviv and its vicinity]. – Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Prace Zoologiczne 26: 65–84 Google Scholar
    Anna Hirna and Vasyl Yanul "On some rare and newly recorded spider species for the Ukrainian Carpathians (Arachnida: Araneae)," Arachnologische Mitteilungen: Arachnology Letters 66(1), 38-43, (29 December 2023). https://doi.org/10.30963/aramit6606
    Received: 26 July 2023; Accepted: 15 December 2023; Published: 29 December 2023
    KEYWORDS
    Cetonana laticeps
    Clubiona saxatilis
    distribution
    Erigone cristatopalpus
    Iberina montana
    Taranucnus beskidicus
    Zelotes similis
    Back to Top