BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 13 August 2025 between 18:00-21:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Registered users receive a variety of benefits including the ability to customize email alerts, create favorite journals list, and save searches.
Please note that a BioOne web account does not automatically grant access to full-text content. An institutional or society member subscription is required to view non-Open Access content.
Contact helpdesk@bioone.org with any questions.
The genera Davus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892, Metriopelma Becker, 1878, and Schizopelma F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897 are redefined. The genus AcentropelmaPocock, 1901 is removed from synonymy with StichoplastusSimon, 1903, and the genus EurypelmellaStrand, 1907b is removed from synonymy with Schizopelma F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897 gen. rest. The holotype specimens of Davus fasciatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892, Metriopelma zebratumBanks, 1909, Metriopelma drymusetesValerio, 1982, Metriopelma breyeri Becker, 1878, Schizopelma bicarinatumF. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897, and conspecifics of Cyclosternum pentalorisSimon, 1888 are redescribed. Hapalopus ruficeps Simon, 1891 is removed from synonymy with Cyclosternum pentalorisSimon, 1888 and, along with Cyclosternum fasciatusO. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892 and Metriopelma zebratumBanks, 1909, are transferred to the genus Davus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892) comb. nov. Davus santossp. nov. is described. Davus ruficeps is regarded as senior synonym of Metriopelma zebratumsyn. nov., Metriopelma drymusetesValerio, 1982 is regarded as junior synonym of Davus fasciatusO. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892syn. nov. Davus mozinnaEstrada-Alvarez, 2014 is regarded as junior synonym of D. pentalorissyn. nov. The specimen of Metriopelma breyeri Becker, 1878 from the Natural History Museum, London, is formally nominated as topotype because the holotype is missing (see Discussion). Metriopelma familiare (Simon, 1889) and Metriopelma ledezmae Vol, 2000 are tentatively transferred to the genus CyclosternumAusserer, 1871comb. nov., while Metriopelma coloratusValerio, 1982 and Metriopelma variegatus (Caporiacco, 1955) are transferred to the genus HapalopusAusserer, 1875combs. nov. Metriopelma veloxPocock, 1903, Lasiodora trinitatis (Pocock, 1903), and L. trinitatis pauciaculeis (Strand, 1916) are transferred to the genus PseudhapalopusStrand, 1907acombs. nov. Metriopelma spinulosumO. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899 is transferred back to the restored genus AcentropelmaPocock, 1901comb. rest. along with Cyclosternum macropusAusserer, 1875, Schizopelma sorkiniSmith, 1995, and Lasiodora gutzkeiReichling, 1997, transferred from Lasiodora Koch, 1850 combs. nov. Hapalopus nigriventris (Mello-Leitão, 1939) is redescribed. Lasiodora tetricus (S
The trapdoor spider genus TigidiaSimon, 1892 is distributed in Madagascar, Mauritius, and India, with eleven species, of which the male of only a single species, Tigidia typica (Strand, 1907), is known. Discovery of a male specimen from Western Ghats of Maharashtra allows us to describe a new species and also gives us the opportunity to illustrate another male of the genus for the first time.
The distribution of lateral eyes in arachnids and their relatives (Chelicerata) is reviewed, including novel data for selected taxa. Particular focus was given to camel spiders (Solifugae) and whip scorpions (Thelyphonida), for which there are conflicting reports about their eye morphology in the literature, and to the condition in some fossil scorpions (Scorpiones) and some extinct trigonotarbid arachnids (Trigonotarbida), which have lateral eyes with c. 30 or up to 15 individual lenses, respectively. Arachnid outgroups like horseshoe crabs (Xiphosura) and sea scorpions (Eurypterida) have compound lateral eyes, but the hypothesis that reduction of these eyes to five lenses or fewer is a synapomorphy of Arachnida can be rejected. Fossil data indicate, instead, that the arachnid lateral eyes were also originally (semi-) compound, and that reduction to only a handful of lenses must be a homoplastic character state. Note that camel spiders retain vestigial lateral eyes, while fossil ricinuleids had a pair of lateral eyes not seen in the living representatives. Among the Pantetrapulmonata group, i.e. spiders and their closest relatives, there is a clear trend towards the lateral eyes consolidating into triads of three lenses. A number of earlybranching spider families (e.g. Hypochilidae, Atypidae, but interestingly not Liphistiidae) retain clear evidence of triads. Whip scorpions unequivocally have two additional minor lenses, documented here photographically, while at least some Devonian trigonotarbids show more than five lateral eye lenses: implying a compound eye in the process of reducing to a simple lens-based system. Most arachnids rely more on non-visual sensory inputs, which may explain why reduction of the lateral eyes appears to be a common evolutionary trend.
This article is only available to subscribers. It is not available for individual sale.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have
purchased or subscribe to this BioOne eBook Collection. You are receiving
this notice because your organization may not have this eBook access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users-please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
Additional information about institution subscriptions can be foundhere