Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2016 Ormocarpopsis Anosyana Thulin & Razafim. (Fabaceae), a New Species from Southern Madagascar and Its Phylogenetic Position
Mats Thulin, Sylvain G. Razafimandimbison
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Thulin, M. & S.G. Razafimandimbison (2016). Ormocarpopsis anosyana Thulin & Razafim. (Fabaceae), a new species from southern Madagascar and its phylogenetic position. Candollea 71 : 281–286. In English, English and French abstracts. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.15553/c2016v712a13

Ormocarpopsis anosyana Thulin & Razafim. (Fabaceae), a new species from the Anosy Region of south-eastern Madagascar, is described and illustrated. According to phylogenetic analyses based on nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences, the new species is, with strong support, sister to Ormocarpopsis mandrarensis Dumaz-le-Grand, another species confined to southeastern Madagascar. Ormocarpopsis anosyana differs markedly from Ormocarpopsis mandrarensis by its generally smaller leaflets with the secondary and tertiary venation drying more or less blackish beneath, by its shorter hypanthium, by its smaller calyx with the lowest tooth about as long as the others, by its wing-petals that are much longer than the keel, by its glabrous ovary, and by its slightly articulated fruits. Ormocarpopsis anosyana is known only from two collections from a single patch of spiny dry forest east of Imonty. It is assigned a preliminary conservation status as “Endangered”.

Introduction

Ormocarpopsis R. Vig., as currently circumscribed, is a genus of seven species in the tribe Aeschynomeneae (Fabaceae), all shrubs or small trees endemic to Madagascar (Thulin et al., 2013). With the inclusion of Ormocarpopsis nitida (Du Puy & Labat) Thulin & Lavin (= Peltiera nitida Du Puy & Labat), based on molecular as well as morphological data, the morphological variation in the genus was expanded to include also a species with articulated fruits.

Ormocarpopsis differs apomorphically from its sister genus Ormocarpum P. Beauv. (Thulin & Lavin, 2001 ; Thulin et al., 2013) : “by its leaflets with the midrib or part of the lower surface drying brown or black due to the accumulation of tannins, by its pods with inconspicuous venation on the valves (valves not prominently longitudinally striate), and by its ellipsoid-spherical (not lenticular) seeds” (Thulin et al., 2013).

During routine naming of Malagasy legumes sent for identification from MO to one of us (MT), two collections of Ormocarpopsis were encountered that could not be matched with any of the previously known species. One of the collections was in flower, the other in fruit, and both originate from the same patch of spiny dry forest in the Anosy Region of south-eastern Madagascar. The aims of the present paper are to describe this new species and to use nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences to infer its phylogenetic position within the genus. The morphology of the new species is discussed, differences from the sister species O. mandrarensis and other species in the genus are provided, as well as field photographs and a preliminary IUCN conservation assessment following IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (IUCN, 2012).

Material and methods

Samples from the two collections of the new species were analyzed along with samples from all seven, previously known, species of Ormocarpopsis, including the type, O. aspera R. Vig. Also included in the analyses were three species of Ormocarpum: the two Malagasy endemics O. drakei R. Vig. and O. bernierianum (Baill.) Du Puy & Labat, and the type of Ormocarpum, O. verrucosum P. Beauv. from continental Africa. The type of Zygocarpum Thulin & Lavin, Z. coeruleum (Balf. f.) Thulin & Lavin, was used as outgroup, based on Thulin & Lavin (2001) and Thulin et al. (2013).

ITS sequences of the two collections of the new species were produced according to the procedures described by Delgado-Salinas et al. (1999). ITS sequences for all the other species included in the analysis were obtained from GenBank. Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for all sequences are provided in Table 1.

The two new sequences were assembled using Staden package v.2.0b9 (Staden, 1996), and subsequently aligned with the previously published sequences using MUSCLE v.3.8.31 (Edgar, 2004). Manual adjustments were made following the similarity criterion (Simmons, 2004) using Se-Al v.2.0 (Rambaut, 1996). Gaps were treated as missing data. We tested the fit of models of nucleotide sequence evolution to our ITS dataset using the Perl script MrAIC v.1.4.5 (Nylander, 2004) based on the software PhylML v.3.1 (Guidon et al., 2010). The corrected Akaike information criterion (AICs, Akaike, 1998) was utilized to select the optimal evolutionary model. The GTR + I + G model (Tavare, 1986) was preferred for the ITS dataset.

A maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using RAxML v.7.2.8 (Stamatakis, 2014) with 1000 rapid bootstrap analyses (using a parsimony tree as a starting tree) followed by the search for the best-scoring ML tree in one single run. A Bayesian analysis was performed using MrBayes v.3.2.3 (Ronquist et al., 2012). Two parallel runs were set, each with four chains and using GTR + I + G as substitution model. The analysis was run for five million generations with a sampling frequency of 1000 generations. Convergence of the two runs was checked using AWTY (Nylander et al., 2008), and was considered to be higher when effective sample size (ESS) values, monitored with Tracer v.1.6 (Rambaut & Drummond, 2003), were higher than 200. We removed the initial 2000 trees as burn-in, and summarized the remaining trees in a majority rule consensus tree.

Results and discussion

The topology of the ITS trees generated from the ML and Bayesian analyses is identical (Fig. 1), and it is also consistent with that of Fig. 1 in Thulin & Lavin (2001). The present analysis clearly shows that the new species is nested within the strongly supported (bootstrap support, BS = 99 %, Bayesian posterior probability, BPP = 1.0) Ormocarpopsis clade and that it is, with strong support (BS = 100 % ; BPP = 1.0), sister to O. mandrarensis Dumaz-le-Grand. Ormocarpopsis mandrarensis is, like the new species, restricted to south-eastern Madagascar, where it grows in xerophytic shrubland and open woodland at elevations between 300 and 1500 m (Du Puy & Labat, 2002), i.e. somewhat higher than the new species that is known from, respectively, 160 m and 224 m elevation. The only other species of Ormocarpopsis that is known from south-eastern Madagascar is the widespread O. aspera R. Vig.

Taxonomic treatment

Ormocarpopsis anosyana Thulin & Razafim., spec. nova
(Fig. 2).

  • Typus: Madagascar. Prov. Toliara: Anosy Region, Ambatoabo, Ankoba, 2 km E of Imonty, 24°47′54″S, 46°40′24″E, 160 m, 16.III.2010, fl., Ratovoson 1559 (holo-: UPS!; iso-: K!, MO-6038420!, P, TAN).

    Ormocarpopsis anosyana Thulin & Razafim. differs from O. mandrarensis Dumaz-le Grand by its generally smaller leaflets (5–15 × 4–10 mm vs 10–35 × 5–18 mm) with secondary and tertiary venation, but not midrib, drying more or less blackish beneath (not with midrib drying dark brown or blackish beneath for a half to two-thirds of its length), by its 1–2 mm (not 3–4 mm) long hypanthium, by its c. 4 mm long calyx with the lowest tooth about as long as the others (not with calyx 5–7 mm long and with lowest tooth clearly longer than the others), by its corolla with wings much longer than the keel (not with wings about as long as or slightly longer than the keel), by its glabrous ovary (ovary not with glandular pubescent stipe and margins), and by its articulated fruits slightly constricted between the segments (not with unarticulated fruits).

    Shrub, 3–4 m tall, DBH 3 cm; twigs glabrous to sparsely pubescent when young, greyish or purplish brown. Leaves alternate on long shoots or clustered on short shoots covered by closely spaced and overlapping stipules, pinnate, with alternate leaflets; stipules narrowly triangular, acute, c. 3 mm long; petiole up to 8 mm long, sparsely pubescent with appressed hairs; rhachis up to 25 mm long, sparsely pubescent with appressed hairs; leaflets 6–8, broadly elliptic to obovate, 5–15 × 4–10 mm, cuneate to rounded at the base, obtuse to truncate or emarginate and shortly mucronate at the apex, glabrous to sparsely pubescent with appressed hairs on both sides, midrib prominent beneath and not drying black, secondary and tertiary venation forming a fine reticulum beneath that is drying more or less blackish ; petiolules 1–1.5 mm long, glabrous to pubescent. Flowers 17–18 mm long, solitary from tips of short shoots; bracts 1–2 mm long, ciliolate; pedicels 4–11 mm long, glabrous or sparsely pubescent with appressed hairs; bracteoles inserted at top of pedicel, opposite, narrowly elliptic, 2–2.5 mm long, ciliolate. Calyx c. 4 mm long, glabrous except for sparsely ciliolate teeth; hypanthium 1–2 mm long, reddish; teeth subacute, the lowest tooth about as long as the others. Corolla yellow ; standard erect or curved backwards, subcircular, the limb c. 13–14 × 12–13 mm, notched at the apex, with 2 callous protuberances at the base inside, the claw c. 3 mm long; wings narrowly and asymmetrically obovate, the limb c. 16 × 6 mm, rounded at the apex, oblique and auriculate at the base, the lower margin rounded, with crescent-shaped folds between the veins near the base, with a claw c. 2.5 mm long ; keel-limb semicircular, c. 7 × 4 mm, with claws c. 3 mm long. Stamens 10, fused into 2 lateral groups of 5 situated on either side of the ovary, 12–15 mm long; anthers c. 0.8 mm long. Ovary with a 3–6 mm long stipe, linear, glabrous, with 4–9 ovules; style 6–8 mm long; stigma minute, capitate. Fruits articulated, with 1–3 segments developing and only slightly constricted between the segments ; fertile segments ellipsoid, thinly coriaceous, reticulately veined, c. 12–15 × 10–12 × 8–10 mm, with thin endocarp, 1-seeded, apparently indehiscent. Seeds subglobose, 10–11 × c. 9 mm, with a minute excentric hilum.

  • Etymology. — The epithet of the new species is derived from Anosy, the name of the region to which it is apparently confined.

  • Distribution and ecology.Ormocarpopsis anosyana is known only from a single patch of spiny dry forest with the genus Alluaudia (Drake) Drake east of Imonty in south-eastern Madagascar at an elevation of 160–224 m.

  • Phenology. — The single flowering and fruiting collections known were made in March and February, respectively.

  • Notes. — As is clear from the diagnosis above, Ormocarpopsis anosyana differs markedly from its sister species O. mandrarensis, but it also differs markedly from all other species of the genus. The secondary and tertiary venation of the leaflets drying blackish beneath is a character that is not matched in any of the other species. The articulated pods, slightly constricted between the segments, are also unique in the genus. In the not closely related Ormocarpopsis nitida the articulated fruits are strongly constricted between the seeds, whereas all the other species have unarticulated fruits. Also, wing-petals that are much longer than the keel are not found in any of the other species.

  • Conservation status.Ormocarpopsis anosyana is only known from two collections from a single patch of forest situated in the corridor between the parcels I and II of the Andohahela National Park and currently managed by the WWF Madagascar (F. Ratovoson, pers. comm.). The area holds a mosaic of vegetation types reflecting recent land use practices such as: residual mature forest patches, farmland, and abandoned slash-and-burn fields (de Wilde et al., 2012). The two collections were made only c. 2 km apart and the occurrence can be regarded as a single location. Similar types of dry forest occur in the adjacent parcel II of this national park and the species should be searched for also there. With only a single location with only two known individuals the species is clearly threatened. Ormocarpopsis anosyana is therefore assigned a preliminary conservation status as “Endangered” [EN C2a(ii)] following the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (IUCN, 2012).

  • Paratypus. Madagascar. Prov. Toliara : Anosy Region, Ambatoabo, Ankoba forest, 24°48′23″S 46°41′13″E, 224 m, 28.II.2009, fr., Randrianaivo et al. 1768 (MO-6420454, P, TAN, UPS).

  • Fig. 1.

    Best tree from the RAxML analysis of Ormocarpopsis R. Vig. and allied genera based on ITS data. Bootstrap support values are shown above and Bayesian posterior probabilities below the branches.

    f01_281.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    Ormocarpopsis anosyana Thulin & Razafim. A. Front view of flower ; B. Flowering branch ; C. Fruiting branch, showing fruit with a single seed developed.

    [Photos : A–B : F. Ratovoson; C : R. Randrianaivo]

    f02_281.jpg

    Table 1.

    Species included in the phylogenetic analysis with voucher information and GenBank accession numbers (new sequences in bold).

    t01_281.gif

    Acknowledgements

    We are grateful to the curators of MO and UPS for access to herbarium material and particularly to Zachary Rogers for information on the specimens in MO, to Fidy Ratovoson and Richard Randrianaivo of MBG's Madagascar Research and Conservation Program for sharing their photographs of the new species, to Anbar Khodabandeh for assistance with the sequencing, to Chen Hou for assistance with the phylogenetic analyses, and to Sven Buerki and Martin Callmander for helpful comments on the manuscript.

    References

    1.

    Akaike, H. (1998). The theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In : Petrov, B.N. & F. Csaki (ed.). Second international symposium on information theory : 26–281. Budapest Akademiai Kiado. Google Scholar

    2.

    Delgado-Salinas, A., T. Turley, A. Richman & M. Lavin ( 1999). Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and wild species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae). Syst. Bot. 24 : 438–460. Google Scholar

    3.

    Du Puy, D.J. & J.-N. Labat ( 2002). Tribe Aeschynomeneae. In : Du Puy, D.J. et al. (ed.), The Leguminosae of Madagascar : 630–665. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Google Scholar

    4.

    Edgar, R.C. ( 2004). MUSCLE : Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl. Acids Res. 32 : 1792–1797. Google Scholar

    5.

    Guidon, G., J.F. Dufayard, V. Lefort, M. Anisimova, W. Hordijk & O. Gascuel ( 2010). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59 : 307–321. Google Scholar

    6.

    IUCN ( 2012). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria : Version 3.1. 2nd ed. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland & Cambridge. Google Scholar

    7.

    Nylander, J.A.A. ( 2004). MrAIC.pl, v. 1.4.5. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala. Google Scholar

    8.

    Nylander, J.A.A., J.C. Wilgenbusch, D.L. Warren & D.L. Swofford ( 2008). AWTY (are we there yet ?) : a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24 : 581–583. Google Scholar

    9.

    Rambaut, A. (1996). Se-Al: Sequence alignment editor.http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk]. Google Scholar

    10.

    Rambaut, A. & A.J. Drummond (2003). Tracer v. 1.2. [ http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk]. Google Scholar

    11.

    Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D.L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M.A. Suchard & J.P. Huelsenbeck ( 2012). MrBayes 3.2 : efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61 : 539–542. Google Scholar

    12.

    Simmons, M.P. ( 2004). Independence of alignment and tree search. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 31 : 874–879. Google Scholar

    13.

    Staden, R. ( 1996). The Staden sequence analysis package. Molec. Biotech. 5 : 233–241. Google Scholar

    14.

    Stamatakis, A. ( 2014). RAxML v. 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30 : 1312–1313. Google Scholar

    15.

    Tavare, S. ( 1986). Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. In : Miura, R.M. (ed.), Some mathematical questions in biology. DNA sequences analysis : 57–86. Providence : American Mathematical Society. Google Scholar

    16.

    Thulin, M. & M. Lavin ( 2001). Phylogeny and biogeography of the Ormocarpum group (Fabaceae) : a new genus Zygocarpum from the Horn of Africa region. Syst. Bot. 26 : 299–317. Google Scholar

    17.

    Thulin, M., P.B. Phillipson & M. Lavin ( 2013). Peltiera (Fabaceae), the coming and going of an “extinct” genus in Madagascar. Adansonia ser. 3, 35 : 61–71. Google Scholar

    18.

    Wilde, M. de, E. Buisson, F. Ratovoson, R. Randrianaivo, S.M. Carrière & P.P. Lowry II ( 2012). Vegetation dynamics in a corridor between protected areas after slash-and-burn cultivation in south-eastern Madagascar. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 159 : 1–8. Google Scholar
    © CONSERVATOIRE ET JARDIN BOTANIQUES DE GENÈVE 2016
    Mats Thulin and Sylvain G. Razafimandimbison "Ormocarpopsis Anosyana Thulin & Razafim. (Fabaceae), a New Species from Southern Madagascar and Its Phylogenetic Position," Candollea 71(2), 281-286, (1 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.15553/c2016v712a13
    Published: 1 December 2016
    KEYWORDS
    Anosy
    FABACEAE
    Madagascar
    Ormocarpopsis
    phylogeny
    taxonomy
    Back to Top