Registered users receive a variety of benefits including the ability to customize email alerts, create favorite journals list, and save searches.
Please note that a BioOne web account does not automatically grant access to full-text content. An institutional or society member subscription is required to view non-Open Access content.
Contact helpdesk@bioone.org with any questions.
GroEL recognizes proteins that are folding improperly or that have aggregation-prone intermediates. Here we have used as substrates for GroEL, wildtype (WT) coat protein of phage P22 and 3 coat proteins that carry single amino acid substitutions leading to a temperature-sensitive folding (tsf) phenotype. In vivo, WT coat protein does not require GroEL for proper folding, whereas GroEL is necessary for the folding of the tsf coat proteins; thus, the single amino acid substitutions cause coat protein to become a substrate for GroEL. The conformation of WT and tsf coat proteins when in a binary complex with GroEL was investigated using tryptophan fluorescence, quenching of fluorescence, and accessibility of the coat proteins to proteolysis. WT coat protein and the tsf coat protein mutants were each found to be in a different conformation when bound to GroEL. As an additional measure of the changes in the bound conformation, the affinity of binding of WT and tsf coat proteins to GroEL was determined using a fluorescence binding assay. The tsf coat proteins were bound more tightly by GroEL than WT coat protein. Therefore, even though the proteins are identical except for a single amino acid substitution, GroEL did not bind these substrate polypeptides in the same conformation within its central cavity. Therefore, GroEL is likely to bind coat protein in a conformation consistent with a late folding intermediate, with substantial secondary and tertiary structure formed.
Overexpressed heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) is known to be associated with thermoprotection in a number of cell lines and transgenic animals. We hypothesized that because overexpression of Hsp70 protects cells from lethal heat stress, inhibition of expression should make cells susceptible to heat stress. The model used for this study was a stably transfected P-19 carcinoma cell line expressing antisense hsp70 under the control of the hsp70b promoter. The results showed marked inhibition of Hsp70 expression after heat shock correlated with heat-induced cell death. Hsp90 and Hsc70 protein expression were not affected by the antisense construct. Unexpectedly, heme oxygenase (HO-1), another highly inducible heat shock protein, was not induced after heat shock in the antisense hsp70 cell line. Heat shock transcription factor-1 (HSF-1) was in a highly phosphorylated state in the antisense cell line before and after heat shock. This was in contrast to the untransfected control P-19 cells where HSF-1 was primarily highly phosphorylated after heat shock. A control cell line expressing only the vector, pMAMneo, without the antisense construct also showed partial loss of Hsp70 induction but not increased cell death after heat shock. The findings support the role of Hsp70 in thermoresistance.
Inhibition of translation can result in cytoprotection against heat shock. The mechanism of this protection has remained elusive so far. Here, the thermoprotective effects of the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) and puromycin were investigated, using as reporter firefly luciferase localized either in the nucleus or in the cytoplasm. A short preincubation of O23 cells with either translation inhibitor was found to attenuate the heat inactivation of a luciferase directed into the cytoplasm, whereas the heat sensitivity of a nuclear-targeted luciferase remained unaffected. After a long-term CHX pretreatment, both luciferases were more heat resistant. Both the cytoplasmic and the nuclear luciferase are protected against heat-induced inactivation in thermotolerant cells and in cells overexpressing heat shock protein (Hsp)70. CHX incubations further attenuated cytoplasmic luciferase inactivation in thermotolerant and in Hsp70 overexpressing cells, even when Hsp70-mediated protection was saturated. It is concluded that protection by translation inhibition is unlikely due to an increase in the pool of free Hsps normally engaged in translation and released from the nascent polypeptide chains on the ribosomes. Rather, a decrease in nascent chains and thermolabile polypeptides may account for the heat resistance promoted by inhibitors of translation.
Apoptosis is a process by which cells undergo a form of non-necrotic cellular suicide. Although it is a programmed process, apoptosis can be induced by various stressors. During sepsis, apoptosis has been regarded as an important cause of cell death in the immune system, leading to unresponsiveness to treatment. This study was designed to investigate how prior heat shock induction can influence the rate of apoptosis in animals that have experienced sepsis. Sprague-Dawley rats were used, and experimental sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Animals in the heated group were anesthetized and received heat shock by whole-body hyperthermia. They were sacrificed 9 h and 18 h after CLP as early and late sepsis, respectively. Apoptosis was evaluated by “DNA ladder” detection in agarose electrophoresis and Tdt-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay. Hsp72 was detected by Western blot analysis. The results showed that the DNA ladder was detected most clearly in the thymus at the late phase of sepsis with time course dependence, while it showed less clearly in heat shock treated animals. Histopathological study by TUNEL assay obtained similar results in the thymus, where the cortex was more susceptible to apoptosis than the medulla. The Western blot analysis showed that the heat shock induced Hsp72 concomitant with an increase in Bcl-2:Bax ratio. In conclusion, heat shock pretreatment prevents rats from sepsis-induced apoptosis that may account for the better outcome of experimental sepsis. An increase in the Bcl-2:Bax ratio may in part explain the molecular mechanism of the effect of heat shock pretreatment.
MTF-1 is a zinc finger transcription factor that mediates the cellular response to heavy metal stress; its targeted disruption in the mouse leads to liver decay and embryonic lethality at day E14. Recently, we have sequenced the entire MTF-1 gene in the compact genome of the pufferfish Fugu rubripes. Here we have defined the promoter sequences of human and mouse MTF-1 and the genomic structure of the mouse MTF-1 locus. The transcription unit of MTF-1 spans 42 kb (compared to 8.5 kb in Fugu) and is located downstream of the gene for a phosphatase (INPP5P) in mouse, human, and fish. In all of these species, the MTF promoter region has the features of a CpG island. In both mouse and human, the 5′ untranslated region harbors conserved short reading frames of unknown function. RNA mapping experiments revealed that in these two species, MTF-1 mRNA is transcribed from a cluster of multiple initiation sites from a TATA-less promoter without metal-responsive elements. Transcription from endogenous and transfected MTF-1 promoters was not affected by heavy metal load or other stressors, in support of the notion that MTF-1 activity is regulated at the posttranscriptional level. Tissue Northern blots normalized for poly A RNA indicate that MTF-1 is expressed at similar levels in all tissues, except in the testes, that contain more than 10-fold higher mRNA levels.
The nonclassical histocompatibility class I gene HLA-G has a tissue-restricted expression. To explore mechanisms involved in HLA-G transcriptional regulation, we have investigated the effect of stress, including heat shock and arsenite treatment, on HLA-G expression in tumor cell lines. We show that stress induces an increase of the level of the different HLA-G alternative transcripts without affecting other MHC class I HLA-A, -B, -E, and -F transcripts. A heat shock element (HSE) that binds to heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) on stress conditions was further identified within the HLA-G promoter. Considering the ability of HLA-G to modulate the function of immunocompetent cells, we hypothesize a new feature of HLA-G as a signal regulating the immune response to stress.
In concert with the stress-induced activation of human heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), the factor becomes inducibly phosphorylated and accumulates into nuclear granules. To date, these processes are not fully understood. Here, we show that although stress caused by the proteasome inhibitors MG132 and clasto-lactacystine β-lactone induces the expression of Hsp70, the formation of HSF1 granules is affected differently in comparison to heat shock. Furthermore, proteasome inhibition increases serine phosphorylation on HSF1, but to a lesser extent than heat stress. Our results suggest that, depending on the type of stress stimulus, the multiple events associated with HSF1 activation might be affected differently.
Protein–protein interactions between human heat shock transcription factor 1 (hHSF1) and general transcription factors TFIIA-γ, TFIIB, TBP, TAFII32, and TAFII55 and positive coactivator PC4 were characterized in order to identify potential targets of contact in the transcriptional preinitiation complex. These contacts represent one of the final steps in the signal transfer of heat stress to the transcriptional apparatus. TATA-binding protein (TBP) and transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) were identified as major targets for HSF1 transcriptional activation domains AD1 and AD2 based on in vitro interaction assays. TBP showed affinity for AD2 and a fragment containing AD1, while the core domain of TFIIB interacted primarily with the AD1 fragment. Interactions were also detected between full-length HSF1 and the small subunit (γ) of TFIIA. PC4 interacted weakly with HSF2 and showed even less affinity for HSF1. Coimmunoprecipitation of transiently expressed TBP in HeLa cells demonstrated that HSF1 AD2 and AD1 AD2 are able to bind TBP in vivo. Assays based on transcriptional interference confirmed predictions that both TBP and TFIIB can interact with HSF1 activation domains in HeLa cells. The negative regulatory region (NR) of HSF1 did not interact with any general factors tested in vitro but did bind TFIID in nuclear extracts through contacts that probably involve TATA associated proteins (TAFs). These results suggest a model for transcriptional regulation by HSF1 that involves a shift between formation of dysfunctional TFIID complexes with the NR and transcriptionally competent complexes with the C-terminal activation domains.
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-inducible transcription factor that mediates biological responses to halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. The unliganded AhR is a cytoplasmic, tetrameric complex consisting of the AhR ligand-binding subunit, a dimer of hsp90, and the hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 (XAP2). The role of XAP2 as a member of the AhR core complex is poorly understood. XAP2 shares significant homology with the immunophilins FKBP12 and FKBP52, including a highly conserved, C-terminal, tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain. XAP2 forms a complex with hsp90 and the AhR but can also bind to both independently. This binding is mediated by the conserved TPR domain. Single-point mutations in this region are sufficient to disrupt the association of XAP2 with both the AhR and hsp90 in cells. Cotransfection of the AhR and XAP2 in COS-1 cells results in increased AhR levels compared with cells transfected with the AhR alone. In contrast, coexpression of the AhR with the TPR containing proteins FKBP52, protein phosphatase 5 (PP5), or XAP2 TPR-mutants deficient in binding to the AhR and hsp90 does not affect AhR levels and coexpression of the AhR with the TPR domain of PP5 results in AhR down-regulation. These results demonstrate that XAP2 is apparently unique among hsp90-binding proteins in its ability to enhance AhR levels. A yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-XAP2-FLAG was constructed and biochemically characterized, and no loss of function was detected. YFP-XAP2-FLAG was transiently transfected into NIH 3T3 and was found to localize in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm when visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Treatment of Hepa-1 cells with the hsp90-binding benzoquinone ansamycin, geldanamycin, and the macrocyclic antifungal compound radicicol resulted in AhR but not XAP2 or FKBP52 turnover. Taken together, these results suggest that XAP2/hsp90 and FKBP52/hsp90 complexes are similar yet exhibit unique functional specificity.
In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, the heat shock protein ClpB functions as a molecular chaperone and plays a key role in resisting high temperature stress. ClpB is important for the development of thermotolerance in yeast and cyanobacteria but apparently not in Escherichia coli. We undertook a complementation study to investigate whether the ClpB protein from E coli (EcClpB) differs functionally from its cyanobacterial counterpart in the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942. The EcClpB protein is 56% identical to its ClpB1 homologue in Synechococcus. A plasmid construct was prepared containing the entire E coli clpB gene under the control of the Synechococcus clpB1 promoter. This construct was transformed into a Synechococcus clpB1 deletion strain (ΔclpB1) and integrated into a phenotypically neutral site of the chromosome. The full-length EcClpB protein (EcClpB-93) was induced in the transformed Synechococcus strain during heat shock as well as the smaller protein (EcClpB-79) that arises from a second translational start inside the single clpB message. Using cell survival measurements we show that the EcClpB protein can complement the Synechococcus ΔclpB1 mutant and restore its ability to develop thermotolerance. We also demonstrate that both EcClpB-93 and -79 appear to contribute to the degree of acquired thermotolerance restored to the Synechococcus complementation strains.
This article is only available to subscribers. It is not available for individual sale.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have
purchased or subscribe to this BioOne eBook Collection. You are receiving
this notice because your organization may not have this eBook access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users-please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
Additional information about institution subscriptions can be foundhere