BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 12 February 2025 between 18:00-21:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
25 August 2023 Phylogeography of the Miyako Toad, Bufo gargarizans miyakonis (Anura: Bufonidae), Inferred from Mitochondrial Sequence Data
Mikio Kasatani, Hirohiko Takeuchi
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Miyako toad, Bufo gargarizans miyakonis, is a subspecies endemic to the Miyako Islands of the Ryukyu Archipelago. The distribution of B. g. miyakonis is curious since no toads are found on other islands in the remaining part of the Ryukyu Archipelago. In this study, we conducted phylogenetic estimation and population genetic analyses using sequence data of the mitochondrial control region to clarify the phylogenetic position of B. g. miyakonis in the B. gargarizans species group and its population history. Results of phylogenetic analyses suggested that B. g. miyakonis was closely related to eastern populations of B. gargarizans and that there is incomplete lineage sorting among these populations. The divergence time between B. g. miyakonis and its closest lineages was estimated to be 0.54–0.75 Ma, the Middle Pleistocene, which was a little younger than the estimated value provided by the previous study. It is probable that the migration of the ancestor of B. g. miyakonis was strongly affected by the Middle Pleistocene glacial cycle. Population genetics analyses suggested that this subspecies experienced a rapid population size expansion, and that there is moderate genetic differentiation of sub-populations. Although the B. g. miyakonis population has a relatively high-level genetic diversity, it is also unique, having a significant number of accumulated mutations following rapid demographic expansion.

Introduction

The Bufo gargarizans species group is widely distributed in eastern Asia, including China, Taiwan, Russia, Korea, and Japan (Frost, 2021). This group includes the mainland Asiatic toad, B. gargarizans sensu lato (which includes B. tibetanus, B. andrewsi, and B. minshanicus), as well as the Taiwanese Bankor toad, B. bankorensis (Macey et al., 1998; Fu et al., 2005; Zhan and Fu, 2011), but taxonomy of the group is debatable because of its genetic complexity (Othman et al., 2022). Although widely distributed, previous molecular phylogenetic studies have revealed a relatively low level of genetic differences among populations from central to eastern Asia including islands close to the mainland (Fu et al., 2005; Zhan and Fu, 2011; Othman et al., 2022). These findings suggest that the common ancestor of these populations rapidly dispersed from southwest China to northeast China (Hu et al., 2007; Zhan and Fu, 2011; Othman et al., 2022). Previous authors argued that the genetic structure of this species group has been formed by repeated range expansions and secondary admixture among the populations during the Pleistocene glaciation cycle and anthropogenic introductions (Zhan and Fu, 2011; Lee et al., 2021; Othman et al., 2022).

Fig. 1.

A: Map of the Eastern area of the Eurasian continent and adjacent regions showing the sampling locations of specimens of the Bufo gargarizans species group (Liu et al., 2000; Fu et al., 2005; Cao et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2007; Yu et al., 2014; Tong et al., 2017; Borzée et al., 2017). Location names denoted by dots with numerals are further described in Appendix II. B: Map of the Miyako islands showing the sampling locations of the specimens of Bufo gargarizans miyakonis used. Location names denoted by dots with numerals are further described in Appendix I.

img-z2-1_144.jpg

The Miyako toad, B. gargarizans miyakonis, is a subspecies endemic to the Miyako Islands of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan (Matsui and Maeda, 2018). The Ryukyu Archipelago contains many islands between the Osumi Islands and Taiwan, but the Miyako islands are only the island group where a toad occurs (Fig. 1A) (Ota, 2003; Matsui and Maeda, 2018). Because of this curious distribution pattern of the toad in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Inger (1947) regarded B. g. miyakonis as introduced by humans from continental China. Subsequently, Late Pleistocene fossils of bufonids were excavated from the Pinza-Abu cave on Miyako Island (Nokariya and Hasegawa, 1985). Bufo g. miyakonis is therefore now considered as indigenous endemic subspecies (Ota, 1998, 2003; Matsui and Maeda, 2018).

The Miyako Islands in the Ryukyu Archipelago are flat and small (Miyakojima City, 2012). Despite this, there are many unique endemic animals in these islands (Ota and Takahashi, 2008). The Late Pleistocene fossil fauna known from Miyako Island contains unique species and it also includes many species of Palearctic animals (Hasegawa, 1985a, 2012). The unique fauna of the Miyako Islands has therefore attracted considerable attention (Ota and Takahashi, 2008; Ota, 2012), but the origins of the endemic taxa and population history of many species has been controversial (Shokita et al., 2006).

The origin and population history of B. g. miyakonis remain unknown. A previous morphological analysis suggested that B. g. miyakonis was closely related to a continental population around Shanghai (Matsui, 1984). Several subsequent molecular studies have confirmed that B. g. miyakonis is a member of the B. gargarizans species group (allozyme: Nishioka et al., 1990; mitochondrial (mt) DNA: Igawa et al., 2006, Hase et al., 2012, Fukutani et al., 2022: in these studies, a few samples of the B. gargarizans species group, including B. g. miyakonis, were analyzed as out groups of B. japonicus species group). Igawa et al. (2006) estimated that the divergence time between the Miyako population and its close relative, the Beijing lineage, was approximately 0.9 Ma. However, this analysis used only three samples of the B. gargarizans species group. Considering that the genetic structure of the B. gargarizans species group is complex (see above), it is necessary to more accurately estimate the relationship between B. g. miyakonis and other populations of B. gargarizans species group.

In this study, we investigated the phylogenetic position of B. g. miyakonis within the B. gargarizans species based on many samples of B. g. miyakonis and many samples of the B. gargarizans species group using DNA sequences of the mitochondrial control region. The sequence data for many samples of the B. gargarizans species group are available and previous studies (e.g., Liu et al., 2000) showed that the mitochondrial control region is suitable to resolve fine scale phylogeny in this group. We first analyzed sequence data of 341 bp, because this, relatively short region of mtDNA was available for samples from the greatest number of collection sites. We used these data to infer the phylogenetic position of the B. gargarizans miyakonis and to estimate the divergence time between B. g. miyakonis and B. g. gargarizans. Second, we conducted population genetic analyses using data of a 615 bp sequence from the mitochondrial control region to assess the genetic diversity and demographic history of B. g. miyakonis. We then considered the population history of B. g. miyakonis based on these results.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

57 individuals of B. g. miyakonis were collected from 53 locations throughout the Miyako Islands (Fig. 1B, Appendix I). All animals were euthanized using CO2 (Suzuki and Kurosawa, 2005) and were then stored at –20°C.

Laboratory procedures

Total DNA was extracted from skeletal muscles using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Sequences from the mitochondrial control region of B. g. miyakonis were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR was performed using ExTaq Kit (TaKaRa Bio., Kusatsu, Japan) using the following primers: CytbA-L (5′-GAA TYG GRG GWC AAC CAG TAG AAG ACC C-3′) and ControlB-H (5′-GTC CAT TGG AGG TTA AGA TCT ACC A-3′) (Goebel et al., 1999). PCR amplification was performed on a MiniAmp Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Massachusetts, USA) using the following protocol: predenaturation at 95°C for 5 min.; 29–35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 65.5–67.5°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 90 s; and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were cleaned up by polyethylene glycol precipitation before determination of sequence identity by cycle sequencing. Cycle sequence reactions used a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and the PCR primers listed above along with the following protocol: 95°C predenaturation for 1 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 65.5–67.5°C for 5 s, and extension at 60°C for 4 min. Reaction products were then cleaned up by ethanol precipitation. The Sequences were read on an ABI PRISM 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). All fragments were sequenced both in the forward and reverse senses and were assembled using Gene-Studio v.2.2.0.0 (Genestudio Inc., Suwanee, USA).

Inference of the genealogy of the Bufo gargarizans species group

To infer the phylogenetic position of B. g. miyakonis within the B. gargarizans species group, we used sequences from the mitochondrial control region. Although the obtained sequences reached a maximum of 348 bp, we used a 341 bp sequence that was shared by all sequences of the B. gargarizans species group. The sequences of B. g. miyakonis were aligned by ClustalW, as implemented in MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018), with sequences from continental populations of B. gargarizans (Fu et al., 2005; Cao et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2007; Borzée et al., 2017; Tong et al., 2017) and Taiwanese populations of B. bankorensis (Liu et al., 2000; Yu et al., 2014) obtained from GenBank (NCBI; Fig. 1A, Appendix II). Similar to the previous studies, the common toad B. bufo (GenBank Accession No: MN122891), which had diverged with B. gargarizans species group in the Late Miocene (Zhan and Fu, 2011; Othman et al., 2022), was chosen as an outgroup. In total 120 haplotypes were analyzed (57 sequences from B. g. miyakonis and 63 sequences from members of the B. gargarizans species group collected at 50 locations: Fig. 1A, Appendix II). The continental populations of B. gargarizans were treated as four geographic groups as follows: western China (W), central China (C), eastern China (E), and northeastern China (NE), following Fu et al. (2005) and Hu et al. (2007). The previous studies suggested that the groups from eastern Taiwan (TE), western Taiwan (TW), and Korean peninsula (K) were all monophyletic (Yu et al., 2014; Borzée et al., 2017), so only one haplotype from each of these groups was used for our analyses.

We then performed phylogenetic analyses by both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) approaches. The most appropriate substitution models were determined using MEGA X based on the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (Akaike, 1974; Kumar et al., 2018) for ML and Bayesian Information Criterion (Schwarz, 1978) for BI. For the ML tree, the HKY+G+I (Hasegawa et al., 1985) model was chosen. MEGA X was used to construct the ML tree. The reliability of the ML tree was assessed by calculating bootstrap probability (BP) (Felsenstein, 1985) with 1,000 replications; all other settings were set to default. To estimate divergence time as well as to infer phylogeny, the BI tree was constructed using BEAST v.2.6.6 (Bouckaert et al., 2019) based on the HKY+G+I model using a coalescent constant model and a relaxed log-normal molecular clock (Drummond et al., 2006). As calibration points, the divergence time of the B. gargarizans species group and B. bufo was set as 14.5±1 Ma, and the time to the most common recent ancestor (TMCRA) of the B. gargarizans species group was set as 9.99±1 Ma (Othman et al., 2022). This tree was initiated with random starting trees, consisting of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains that ran for 50 million generations, with sampling every 1,000 generations. The first 20% of generations were excluded as burn-in. Convergence of the chains to a stationary distribution and the effective sample size (ESS) were assessed visually using Tracer v.1.7.2. (Rambaut et al., 2018). Furthermore, to infer the phylogenetic relationships among haplotypes, median-joining network tree was constructed using NETWORK v.10.2.0.0. (Bandelt et al., 1999; Fluxus Technology Ltd., 2021).

Genetic diversity and population structure

We analyzed the genetic diversity and population structure of B. g. miyakonis samples, using a 615 bp sequence shared by all samples of this subspecies, including the extended region of the ≤348 bp sequence described above. Haplotype diversity (h) and nucleotide diversity (π) were calculated using Arlequin v3.5.2.2 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010). Populations of B. g. miyakonis were then divided into two sub-populations: the Miyako Island–Kurima Island (MY–KR) and Irabu Island–Shimoji Island (IR–SM) groups. To investigate the genetic structure of these groups, we conducted an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier et al., 1992) with a permutation test of 1,000 random replications using Arlequin v.3.5.2.2.

Demographic history

To investigate the population demographic history of B. g. miyakonis, the mismatch distribution (Rogers and Harpending, 1992), Tajima's D (Tajima, 1989) and Fu's Fs (Fu, 1997) were computed using Arlequin v3.5.2.2. The statistical significance of these tests was then tested using parametric bootstrapping with 1,000 replicates. In addition, an extended Bayesian skyline plot (EBSP) analysis (Drummond et al., 2005) was used to infer the demographic history. The EBSP was constructed based on an HKY model using a coalescent extended Bayesian skyline model and a relaxed log-normal clock consisting of MCMC chains run for 100 million generations, with sampling every 1,000 generations. The first 20% of generations were excluded as burn-in, and convergence of the chains to a stationary distribution and ESS were assessed visually using Tracer v.1.7.2. The evolution rate of the Miyako population was set to 1.69% per Ma, as inferred from the previously mentioned divergence time estimation. Because reproductive generations overlap in bufonids (e.g., Okuno, 1986), we did not estimate the effective population size in a strict sense. Bayesian skyline plots were produced using plotEBSP.R, an R package, implemented in R v.4.2.0 (R Core Team, 2021).

Table 1.

Genetic variation and statistics of Bufo gargarizans miyakonis (615 bp). In the IR–SM population, the number of samples was small, so the mismatch distribution analysis did not converge. n: sample size, hn: number of haplotypes, h: haplotype diversity value, π: nucleotide diversity value, SD: standard deviation, SSD: sum of square deviations, Rag: Harpending's Raggedness index. Asterisks indicate levels of significance: double asterisks (**) for P≤0.01.

img-z5-2_144.gif

Results

Sequence characteristics

Of the 57 B. g. miyakonis individuals studied, we identified 12 haplotypes using a 347 bp sequence of the mitochondrial control region (shared by all sequences of B. g. miyakonis in the first dataset for phylogenetic inference of the B. gargarizans species group) and 19 haplotypes using the 615 bp sequence (used for population analyses) (Table 1; Appendix I; GenBank Accession No.: LC683658–LC683676). Haplotypes, MYK01, 05, 07, 10, recognized in the 347 bp data were divided into more than one haplotypes in the 615 bp dataset.

Phylogenetic position of Bufo gargarizans miyakonis

Our phylogenetic trees were consistent with previous studies (e.g., Igawa et al., 2006, Zhan and Fu, 2011; Fig. 2A). The result of phylogenetic inference showed that B. g. miyakonis was included in the clade that consisted of many eastern populations of B. gargarizans (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the TE population, which was most geographically proximate, was relatively far from B. g. miyakonis in the tree. The monophyly of B. g. miyakonis was not supported (Fig. 2B). The monophyly of haplotypes, MYK01–10 (hereafter, haplogroup MYK), was supported by high BP and posteri- or probability (PP), but the remaining two haplotypes, MYK11 and MYK12, were located outside of the haplogroup MYK Clade along with a few the eastern populations of B. gargarizans (Fig. 2; E1 from Locality No. 90 and No. 93, and E2 from Locality No. 93, in Fig. 1A). In the network, B. g. miyakonis was not distinct from the continental B. gargarizans group. MYK11, MYK12 were placed between the other haplotypes from the Miyako Islands and those from the continental China (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2.

Genetic trees of the Bufo gargarizans species group reconstructed from the mt control region (341 bp). Bootstrap probability (BP) for maximum likelihood (ML) and posterior probability (PP) values for Bayesian inference (BI) models are given in order at each node, although only when BP≥70% and PP≥0.80. A: ML trees of the B. gargarizans species group. The clade that includes B. g. miyakonis is indicated in gray. B: ML trees of the clade that includes B. g. miyakonis. Haplotypes of B. g. miyakonis are colored in gray. See the main text for information on how B. g. miyakonis samples were grouped. C: Median-Joining network trees of the clade that includes B. g. miyakonis. Gray circles indicate haplotypes of B. g. miyakonis, white rectangles indicate haplotypes of B. gargarizans or B. bankorensis, and black dots indicate missing haplotypes, respectively. When nucleotide substitution between haplotypes has occurred more than once, the number of times is shown as a number in parentheses.

img-z6-1_144.jpg

Divergence time

The average evolution rate of the mitochondrial control region of B. gargarizans species group was estimated to be 1.37%±0.27% (ESS=5,188) per Ma. The divergence time between haplogroup MYK and other haplotypes was 0.75 Ma (95% HPD=0.289–1.02 Ma) in the Middle Pleistocene (Fig. 3), and the evolution rate of haplogroup MYK was 1.69% per Ma. In addition, the divergence times of MYK11 from E1 and MYK12 from E2 were estimated to be 0.62 Ma (95% HPD=0.072–0.749 Ma) and 0.54 Ma (95% HPD=0.022–0.736 Ma), respectively (Fig. 3).

Genetic diversity and population structure

For the 615 bp B. g. miyakonis population dataset, our estimate of h was 0.8972±0.0232, and our estimate of π was 0.004984±0.002919 (Table 2). When comparing the genetic diversity of the sub-populations, IR–SM samples showed approximately half the diversity (as measured by π) as MY–KR samples (Table 1).

Our AMOVA results revealed that there was significant genetic differentiation between sub-populations (Table 2).

Demographic history

For the whole B. g. miyakonis population, Tajima's D was negative (–1.13053) although not statistically significant (p=0.11). Moreover, Fu's Fs was also negative, and it was statistically significant (Table 1). Tajima's D was also not significant for both sub-populations. Fu's Fs was negative and significant only for the MY–KR group. The mismatch distribution of the population was a unimodal curve, with a peak around 3–4 (τ=3.129, θ0=0.000, θ1= 17.188, average pairwise difference=3.065). The sum of square variance (SSD) and Harpending's Raggedness index (Rag) were also not significant, suggesting the rapid expansion of this population (Table 1). The mismatch distribution of the MY–KR group was generally similar to that of the population as a whole. The distribution for the IR–SM group was not computed because of insufficient sample size. The EBSP of haplogroup MYK also indicated a rapid population expansion since 0.1 Ma ca (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Bayesian divergence time estimates of the mt control region (341 bp) of the Bufo gargarizans species group. The haplotypes of B. g. miyakonis (the haplogroup MYK and MYK11–12) are colored in dark gray and gray, respectively. The black dot nodes indicate calibration points based on Othman et al. (2022). Gray bars on nodes indicate 95% credible intervals.

img-z7-1_144.jpg

Table 2.

AMOVA results. Asterisks indicate levels of significance: double asterisks (**) for P≤0.01.

img-z7-4_144.gif

Fig. 4.

The EBSP of haplogroup MYK. The vertical axis and the horizontal axis are the logarithmic relative population size and the absolute time before the present (Ma), respectively.

img-z8-1_144.jpg

Discussion

Origin and formation history of Bufo gargarizans miyakonis

Phylogenetic inferences suggested that the origin of B. g. miyakonis were from the eastern continental populations. In contrast, the Taiwanese groups, that are geographically closest to the Miyako Islands populations, were not closely related to the Miyako populations genetically. These phylogenetic relationships were consistent with the results of biochemical (Nishioka et al., 1990) and morphological (Matsui, 1984) analyses. Our results also suggested that B. g. miyakonis is not monophyletic in the mtDNA phylogeny. The non-monophyly of B. g. miyakonis might be attributable to an incomplete lineage sorting. In this species group, some cases of what appear to be incomplete lineage sorting have been reported (Yu et al., 2014; Othman et al., 2022). To clarify the relationship between B. gargarizans species group and B. g. miyakonis, more markers such as nuDNA loci should be used in future studies.

The divergence time between haplogroup MYK and the continental haplotypes was estimated to be 0.75 Ma, sometime in the Middle Pleistocene. The divergence times of MYK11 and MYK 12 from respective continental counterparts were estimated to be 0.54 and 0.62 Ma approximately, respectively. These estimates were slightly younger than 0.9 Ma, the estimate given by Igawa et al. (2006) who used the Beijing population as a representative of B. gargarizans. Since our dataset included closer lineages (E1 and E2) to Miyako populations, which collected in sites closer to the Miyako Islands than Beijing (Locality No. 90 and No. 93 in Fig. 1A), our estimates were slightly younger.

The distribution of close populations suggests that the ancestral B. g. miyakonis population migrated over a land bridge connecting eastern Eurasia and the Miyako Islands. A land bridge between continental Eurasia and the Miyako Islands has been suggested by fossil evidence, including many Palearctic species, from the Pinza-Abu cave on Miyako Island (Hasegawa, 1985a; Oshiro and Nohara, 2000). Almost all of these Palearctic species such as Capreolus miyakoensis and Rattus miyakoensis are considered to be closely related to other species present in northeastern Eurasia (Hasegawa, 1985a, 1985b; Zhen and Hasegawa, 1985; Kawaguchi et al., 2009). In the Early Pleistocene, the Miyako Islands were last connected to neighboring islands (Kizaki and Oshiro, 1977, 1980; Ota, 1998; Kimura, 2003). At 0.12–0.2 Ma in the Middle Pleistocene, the area between the continent and the Miyako Islands was likely shallow and there was a temporal land bridge at the ebb (Kimura, 1990; Kimura et al., 2001). Kimura et al. (2001) suggested a probability that some of the above Palearctic species might have migrated to the Miyako Islands across this temporal land bridge during the Middle Pleistocene. Considering that the toads depend on fresh water, it is unlikely that B. g. miyakonis could migrate through a shallow sea like mammal species (e.g., C. miyakoensis) could. However, our results suggest that the migration route of B. g. miyakonis was similar to other Palearctic species. We considered that this land bridge had been a corridor for the ancestor of B. g. miyakonis. Although recent phylogenetic analyses have suggested that several frog species inhabiting the Ryukyu Archipelago dispersed overseas (Komaki et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2020), the oversea dispersal of B. g. miyakonis is unlikely to happen, because its expected migration route is perpendicular to the present-day and past Kuroshio Current (Gallagher et al., 2015).

Stratigraphic studies have suggested that the Miyako Islands submerged (completely or partly) during the Early–Middle Pleistocene, 0.41–0.95 Ma (Iryu et al., 2006). Since this estimate is more recent than the divergence time between B. g. miyakonis and the continental B. gargarizans group, 0.54–0.75 Ma, the migration event of B. g. miyakonis may have occurred later than the genetic divergence. It is consistent with the inference that the ancestral population of B. g. miyakonis had migrated to the Miyako Islands at 0.12–0.2 Ma, when the land bridge had connected the continent and the Miyako Islands (see above; Kimura et al., 2001). Furthermore, the scale of crustal movements during the Late Pleistocene and the uniqueness of the fossils found on individual islands of the Ryukyu Archipelago both provide reasons to be skeptical of the existence of a Late Pleistocene land bridge in the Ryukyu Archipelago (Hasegawa, 2012; Furukawa and Fujitani, 2014; Yokoyama et al., 2018). Our results suggested that the ancestral population of B. g. miyakonis migrated to the Miyako Islands at the Middle Pleistocene, consistent with the absence of a land bridge in the Late Pleistocene. The curious distribution of the B. g. miyakonis may be affected by the formation history of the Miyako Islands. Future research should focus on seeking geographic or stratigraphic evidence for this land bridge.

The migration history of B. g. miyakonis is notably different from that inferred for other species from the Miyako Islands (land snails: Kameda et al., 2007; freshwater crab: Segawa, 2011; Asian keelback snake: Kaito and Toda, 2016; skinks: Kurita and Toda, 2017; narrow-mouthed frog: Tominaga et al., 2019). Moreover, on the Miyako Islands, almost all animal species that originated from northeastern Eurasia are considered extinct (Hasegawa, 2012), and there are few modern species that have their closest relatives on the continent like B. g. miyakonis (e.g., Miyako grass lizard: Lin et al., 2002; Ota et al., 2002). Therefore, our results may be important for understanding the formation process of present-day terrestrial fauna of the Miyako Islands.

Population genetics

Our population genetic analyses suggested rapid demographic expansion of B. g. miyakonis. For the B. g. miyakonis population, we measured a high value for h (0.8972±0.0232) and a low value for π (0.004984±0.002919) relative to other members of the B. gargarizans species group. Hu et al. (2007) gave h and π values for the continental populations of the B. gargarizans species group: the mean h was 0.947±0.006 with a range from 0.000–0.855± 0.085, and the mean π was 0.04739±0.00215 with a range from 0.0000–0.04438±0.00524 (Hu et al., 2007). Inferred from the relationship between a relatively high h and a low π values (Grant and Bowen, 1998; Avise, 2000), it was suggested that B. g. miyakonis was initially genetically uniform and subsequently accumulated mutations due to a rapid expansion of the population size. Our mismatch distribution analysis and Fu's Fs test results also supported this demographic trend. The EBSP also suggested a rapid expansion from 0.1 Ma until the present. Although our estimate suggests that this expansion started before the last glacial maximum (LGM), it might also have been caused by increases in land area following glacial regression. Because of the high diversity of fossil fauna and the existence of large mammals in the Late Pleistocene, the environment of the Miyako Islands is thought to have been significantly larger in both land area and carrying capacity before the LGM relative to the present (Ota and Takahashi, 2008). After the LGM, the land area and carrying capacity decreased, and large animals became extinct (Ota and Takahashi, 2008). However, it was estimated that the expansion of B. g. miyakonis population was maintained after the LGM.

We also found evidence of moderate genetic differentiation of B. g. miyakonis sub-populations. We found many unique haplotypes in the MY–KR sample set, which had a relatively large sample size. On the other hand, we found no unique haplotype from the IR–SM dataset, partially because of the sample size was smaller. Nevertheless, we found evidence of differentiation among these sub-populations. Interestingly, no such genetic differentiation has been reported for other species present on the Miyako Islands (smooth skinks: Koizumi et al., 2014; anchialine atyid shrimp: Weese et al., 2012, 2013). All collection sites used in this study were part of a continuous landmass at the LGM (Japan Association for Quaternary Research, 1987). After the LGM, geographic isolation due to the transgression of the sea level likely contributed to the genetic differentiation between subpopulations.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Y. Kamiyama, K. Takahashi, and K. Yamakawa for helping with field work and T. Ouchi for helping with laboratory work. Collection of the animals in the Miyako Islands was carried out with the permission of Miyakojima City (Approval Number, 253 in 2017; 258 in 2018; 9 in 2019; 903 in 2020). This study was conducted by trained personnel in accordance with the guideline of Nihon University Animal Care and Use Committee (NUACUC).

© 2023 by The Herpetological Society of Japan

Literature Cited

1.

Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716–723. Google Scholar

2.

Avise, J. C. 2000. Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

3.

Bandelt, H.-J., Forster, P., and Röhl, A. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 37–48. Google Scholar

4.

Borzée, A., Santos, J. L., Sánchez-Ramírez, S., Bae, Y., Heo, K., Jang, Y., and Jowers, M. J. 2017. Phylogeographic and population insights of the Asian common toad (Bufo gargarizans) in Korea and China: population isolation and expansions as response to the ice ages. PeerJ 5: e4044. Google Scholar

5.

Bouckaert, R., Vaughan, T. G., Barido-Sottani, J., Duchêne, S., Fourment, M., Gavryushkina, A., Heled, J., Jones, G., Kühnert, D., De Maio, N., Matschiner, M., Mendes, F. K., Müller, N. F., Ogilvie, H. A., Du Plessis, L., Popinga, A., Rambaut, A., Rasmussen, D., Siveroni, I., Suchard, M. A., Wu, C.-H., Xie, D., Zhang, C., Stadler, T., and Drummond, A. J. 2019. BEAST 2.5: an advanced software platform for bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 15: e1006650. Google Scholar

6.

Cao, S.-Y., Wu, X.-B., Yan, P., Hu, Y.-L., Su, X., and Jiang, Z.-G. 2006. Complete nucleotide sequences and gene organization of mitochondrial genome of Bufo gargarizans. Mitochondrion 6: 186–193. Google Scholar

7.

Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., and Rambaut, A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biology 4: e88. Google Scholar

8.

Drummond, A. J., Rambaut, A., Shapiro, B., and Pybus, O. G. 2005. Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1185–1192. Google Scholar

9.

Excoffier, L. and Lischer, H. E. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567. Google Scholar

10.

Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., and Quattro, J. M. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479–491. Google Scholar

11.

Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. Google Scholar

12.

Fluxus Technology Ltd. 2021.  https://www.fluxusengineering.com/index.htm(accessed 15 February 2022) Google Scholar

13.

Frost, D. R. 2021. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. version 6.1 . American Museum of Natural History.  https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php(accessed 15 February 2022) Google Scholar

14.

Fu, J., Weadick, C. J., Zeng, X., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Zheng, Y., Li, C., and Hu, Y. 2005. Phylogeographic analysis of the Bufo gargarizans species complex: a revisit. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 202–213. Google Scholar

15.

Fu, Y.-X. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147: 915–925. Google Scholar

16.

Fukutani, K., Matsui, M., Tran, D. V., and Nishikawa, K. 2022. Genetic diversity and demography of Bufo japonicus and B. torrenticola (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae) influenced by the quaternary climate. PeerJ 10: e13452. Google Scholar

17.

Furukawa, M. and Fujitani, T. 2014. Comparative study on pleistocene paleogeographic maps of Ryukyu Arc. Bulletin of the Faculty of Science University of the Ryukyus 98: 1–8. Google Scholar

18.

Gallagher, S. J., Kitamura, A., Iryu, Y., Itaki, T., Koizumi, I., and Hoiles, P. W. 2015. The pliocene to recent history of the Kuroshio and Tsushima currents: a multi-proxy approach. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science 2: 17. Google Scholar

19.

Goebel, A. M., Donnelly, J. M., and Atz, M. E. 1999. PCR primers and amplification methods for 12S ribosomal DNA, the control region, cytochrome oxidase I, and cytochrome in bufonids and other frogs, and an overview of PCR primers which have amplified DNA in amphibians successfully. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 163–199. Google Scholar

20.

Grant, W. S. and Bowen, B. W. 1998. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. The Journal of Heredity 89: 415–426. Google Scholar

21.

Hase, K., Shimada, M., and Nikoh, N. 2012. High degree of mitochondrial haplotype diversity in the Japanese common toad Bufo japonicus in urban Tokyo. Zoological Science 29: 702–708. Google Scholar

22.

Hasegawa, Y. 1985a. Conclusion. p. 181–184. In : Okinawa Prefectural Government Department of Education (ed.), Reports on Excavation of the Pinza-Abu Cave . Okinawa Prefectural Board of Education, Naha. Google Scholar

23.

Hasegawa, Y. 1985b. Note on carnivora, chiroptera and larger rat (Diplothrix) from Pinza-Abu cave. p. 83–91. In : Okinawa Prefectural Government Department of Education (ed.), Reports on Excavation of the Pinza-Abu Cave . Okinawa Prefectural Board of Education, Naha. Google Scholar

24.

Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., and Yano, T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22: 160–174. Google Scholar

25.

Hasegawa, Y. 2012. On the origin of Japanese living mammals. Mammalian Science 52: 233–247. Google Scholar

26.

Hu, Y.-L., Wu, X.-B., Jiang, Z.-G., Yan, P., Su, X., and Cao, S.-Y. 2007. Population genetics and phylogeography of Bufo gargarizans in China. Biochemical Genetics 45: 697–711. Google Scholar

27.

Igawa, T., Kurabayashi, A., Nishioka, M., and Sumida, M. 2006. Molecular phylogenetic relationship of toads distributed in the far east and Europe inferred from the nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial DNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 250–260. Google Scholar

28.

Inger, R. F. 1947. Preliminary survey of the amphibians of the Riukiu Islands. Fieldiana Zoology 32: 297–352. Google Scholar

29.

Iryu, Y., Matsuda, H., Machiyama, H., Piller, W. E., Quinn, T. M., and Mutti, M. 2006. Introductory perspective on the COREF project. Island Arc 15: 393–406. Google Scholar

30.

Japan Association for Quaternary Research 1987. Quanternary maps of Japan . Univeristy of Tokyo Press, Tokyo. Google Scholar

31.

Kaito, T. and Toda, M. 2016. The biogeographical history of Asian keelback snakes of the genus Hebius (Squamata: Colubridae: Natricinae) in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 118: 187–199. Google Scholar

32.

Kameda, Y., Kawakita, A., and Kato, M. 2007. Cryptic genetic divergence and associated morphological differentiation in the arboreal land snail Satsuma (Luchuhadra) largillierti (Camaenidae) endemic to the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 519–533. Google Scholar

33.

Kawaguchi, S., Kaneko, Y., and Hasegawa, Y. 2009. A new species of the fossil murine rodent from the Pinza-Abu Cave, the Miyako Island of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Bulletin of Gunma Museum of Natural History 13: 15–28. Google Scholar

34.

Kimura, M. 1990. Genesis and formation of the Okinawa Trough, Japan. The Memoir of the Geological Society of Japan 34: 77–88. Google Scholar

35.

Kimura, M. 2003. Paleogeography and paleoenvironment of the Ryukyu Arc. p. 17–24. In : M. Nishida, N. Shikatani, and S. Shokita (eds.), The flora and fauna of inland waters in the Ryukyu Islands. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. Google Scholar

36.

Kimura, M., Matsumoto, T., Shinjo, R., Nakamura, M., Motoyama, I., Machiyama, H., Toyama, G., and Yagi, H. 2001. Meanders recognized in the southwestern part of the Okinawa Trough and its significance. JAMSTEC Journal of Deep Sea Reserch 18: 103–120. Google Scholar

37.

Kizaki, K. and Oshiro, I. 1977. Paleogeography of the Ryukyu Islands. Kaiyo Monthly 9: 542–549. Google Scholar

38.

Kizaki, K. and Oshiro, I. 1980. The origin of the Ryukyu Islands. p. 8–37. In : K. Kizaki (ed.), Natural History of Ryukyus. Tsukiji-Shokan, Tokyo. Google Scholar

39.

Koizumi, Y., Ota, H., and Hikida, T. 2014. Phylogeography of the two smooth skinks, Scincella boettgeri and S. formosensis (Squamata: Scincidae) in the southern Ryukyus and Taiwan, as inferred from variation in mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. Zoologial Science 31: 228–236. Google Scholar

40.

Komaki, S., Lin, S., Nozawa, M., Oumi, S., Sumida, M., and Igawa, T. 2017. Fine-scale demographic processes resulting from multiple overseas colonization events of the Japanese stream tree frog, Buergeria japonica. Journal of Biogeography 44: 1586–1597. Google Scholar

41.

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., and Tamura, K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 1547–1549. Google Scholar

42.

Kurita, K. and Toda, M. 2017. The role of ecological factors in setermining phylogeographic and population genetic structure of two sympatric island skinks (Plestiodon kishinouyei and P. stimpsonii). Genetica 145: 223–234. Google Scholar

43.

Lee, C., Fong, J. J., Jiang, J.-P., Li, P.-P., Waldman, B., Chong, J. R., Lee, H., and Min, M.-S. 2021. Phylogeographic study of the Bufo gargarizans species complex, with emphasis on Northeast Asia. Animal Cells and Systems 25: 434–444. Google Scholar

44.

Lin, S.-M., Chen, C. A., and Lue, K.-Y. 2002. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the grass lizards genus Takydromus (Reptilia: Lacertidae) of east Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 276–288. Google Scholar

45.

Liu, W., Lathrop, A., Fu, J., Yang, D., and Murphy, R. W. 2000. Phylogeny of east asian bufonids inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences (Anura: Amphibia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14: 423–435. Google Scholar

46.

Macey, J. R., Schulte, J. A. II , Larson, A., Fang, Z., Wang, Y., Tuniyev, B. S., and Papenfuss, T. J. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of toads in the Bufo bufo species group from the eastern escarpment of the Tibetan Plateau: a case of vicariance and dispersal. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 80–87. Google Scholar

47.

Matsui, M. 1984. Morphometric variation analyses and revision of the Japanese toads (genus Bufo, Bufonidae). Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University 26: 209–428. Google Scholar

48.

Matsui, M. and Maeda, N. 2018. Encyclopedia of Japanese Frogs. Bun ichi Sogo Shuppan, Japan. Google Scholar

49.

Miyakojima City. 2012. Overview Miyakojima City.  https://www.city.miyakojima.lg.jp/syoukai/gaiyou.html(accessed 15 February 2022) Google Scholar

50.

Nishioka, M., Sumida, M., Ueda, H., and Wu, Z. 1990. Genetic Relationships among 13 Bufo species and subspecies elucidated by the method of electrophoretic analyses. Scientific Report of the Laboratory for Amphibian Biology, Hiroshima University 10: 53–91. Google Scholar

51.

Nokariya, H. and Hasegawa, Y. 1985. Fossil of frogs from Pinza-Abu Cave. Miyako Island, Okinawa, Japan. p. 151–159. In : Okinawa Prefectural Government Department of Education (ed.), Reports on Excavation of the Pinza-Abu Cave . Okinawa Prefectural Board of Education, Naha. Google Scholar

52.

Okuno, R. 1986. Studies on the natural history of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus japonicus, XII. Population structure and dynamics of a habitat group. Japanese Journal of Ecology 36: 153–161. Google Scholar

53.

Oshiro, I. and Nohara, T. 2000. Distribution of Pleistocene terrestrrial vertebrates and thier migration to the Ryukyus. Tropics 10: 41–50. Google Scholar

54.

Ota, H. 1998. Geographic patterns of endemism and speciation in amphibians and reptiles of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan, with special reference to their paleogeographical implications. Researches on Population Ecology 40: 189–204. Google Scholar

55.

Ota, H. 2003. Toward a synthesis of paleontological and neontological information on the terrestrial vertebrates of the Ryukyu Archipelago (1) systematic biogeographic review. Journal of Fossil Research (Jpn) 36: 43–59. Google Scholar

56.

Ota, H. 2012. Phylogeopgraphy of terrestrial biota and geohistory of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan: hypothetical scenarios hitherto proposed and directions of future studies. The Earth Monthly 34: 427–436. Google Scholar

57.

Ota, H., Honda, M., Chen, S. L., Hikida, T., Panha, S., Oh, H. S., and Matsui, M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships, taxonomy, character evolution and biogeography of the lacertid lizards of the genus Takydromus (Reptilia: Squamata): a molecular perspective. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76: 493–509. Google Scholar

58.

Ota, H. and Takahashi, A. 2008. Mysterious fauna of the Miyako Islands. p. 24–44. In : Association for the Study of Nature and Human Culture of the Miyako Islands (ed.), Nature and Human Culture of the Miyako Islands – 2. Border Inc., Naha. Google Scholar

59.

Othman, S. N., Litvinchuk, S. N., Maslova, I., Dahn, H., Messenger, K. R., Andersen, D., Jowers, M. J., Kojima, Y., Skoninov, D. V., Yasumiba, K., Chuang, M.-F., Chen, Y.-H., Bae, Y., Hoti, J., Jang, Y., and Borzee, A. 2022. From gondwana to the Yellow Sea, evolutionary diversifications of true toads Bufo sp. in the Eastern Palearctic and a revisit of species boundaries for Asian lineages. eLife 11(e70494): 1–42. Google Scholar

60.

R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available via https://www.R-project.org/  Google Scholar

61.

Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G., and Suchard, M. A. 2018. Posterior summarization in bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. Google Scholar

62.

Rogers, A. R. and Harpending, H. 1992. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 9: 552–569. Google Scholar

63.

Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6: 461–464. Google Scholar

64.

Segawa, R. A. 2011. Molecular phylogenetic study of the freshwater crabs in Japan. p. 103–110. In : T. Kawai and K. Nakata (eds.), Shrimps, Crabs, and Crayfish - Conservation and Biology of Freshwater Crustaceans . Seibutsu-kenkyusha, Tokyo. Google Scholar

65.

Shokita, S., Naruse, T., and Fujita, Y. 2006. The origin of Geothelphusa miyakoensis. Cancer 15: 1–7. Google Scholar

66.

Suzuki, M. and Kurosawa, T. 2005. Translation and opinion 2000 report of the AVMA panel on euthanasia (VI). Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association 58: 649–651. Google Scholar

67.

Tajima, F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585–595. Google Scholar

68.

Tominaga, A., Matsui, M., Shimoji, N., Khonsue, W., Wu, C.-S., Toda, M., Eto, K., Nishikawa, K., and Ota, H. 2019. Relict distribution of Microhyla (Amphibia: Microhylidae) in the Ryukyu Archipelago: high diversity in East Asia maintained by Insularization. Zoologica Scripta 48: 440–453. Google Scholar

69.

Tong, H., Wo, Y., Liao, P., and Jin, Y. 2017. Phylogenetic, demographic and dating analyses of Bufo gargarizans populations from the Zhoushan Archipelago and Mainland China. Asian Herpetological Research 8: 165–173. Google Scholar

70.

Yokoyama, Y., Fujita, M., and Ota, H. 2018. Critical scrutiny of the land bridge hypothesis for Ryukyu Chain. Kagaku 88: 616–624. Google Scholar

71.

Yu, T.-L., Lin, H.-D., and Weng, C.-F. 2014. A new phylogeographic pattern of endemic Bufo bankorensis in Taiwan Island is attributed to the genetic variation of populations. PLoS One 9: e98029. Google Scholar

72.

Yu, G.-H., Du, L.-N., Wang, J.-S., Rao, D.-Q., Wu, Z.-J., and Yang, J.-X. 2020. From mainland to islands: colonization history in the tree frog Kurixalus (Anura: Rhacophoridae). Current Zoology 66: 667–675. Google Scholar

73.

Weese, D. A., Fujita, Y., Hidaka, M., and Santos, S. R. 2012. The long and short of it: genetic variation and population structure of the anchialine atyid shrimp Caridina rubella on Miyako-jima, Japan. Journal of Crustacean Biology 32: 109–117. Google Scholar

74.

Weese, D. A., Fujita, Y., and Santos, S. R. 2013. Multiple colonizations lead to cryptic biodiversity in an island ecosystem: comparative phylogeography of anchialine shrimp species in the Ryukyu Archipelato, Japan. The Biological Bulletin 225: 24–41. Google Scholar

75.

Zhan, A. and Fu, J. 2011. Past and present: phylogeography of the Bufo gargarizans species complex inferred from multi-loci allele sequence and frequency data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61: 136–148. Google Scholar

76.

Zhen, B. and Hasegawa, Y. 1985. The discover of Capreolus miyakoensis on the Miyako Island. p. 33–45. In : Okinawa Prefectural Government Department of Education (ed.), Reports on Excavation of the Pinza-Abu Cave . Okinawa Prefectural Board of Education, Naha. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix I

List of specimen information of Bufo gargarizans miyakonis. Area was referred to by the subpopulation name in AMOVA. n: sample size.

img-z15-3_144.gif

(continued)

img-AY4I_144.gif

Appendices

Appendix II

List of the collection sites of the Bufo gargarizans species group coincides with the collection point numbers used in Fig 1A. Area of B. gargarizans species was referred to by the regional division used in previous studies (Fu et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2007).

img-z17-3_144.gif

(continued)

img-AgBY_144.gif
Mikio Kasatani and Hirohiko Takeuchi "Phylogeography of the Miyako Toad, Bufo gargarizans miyakonis (Anura: Bufonidae), Inferred from Mitochondrial Sequence Data," Current Herpetology 42(2), 144-161, (25 August 2023). https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.42.144
Accepted: 17 April 2023; Published: 25 August 2023
KEYWORDS
Bufo gargarizans miyakonis
Bufo gargarizans species group
Miyako Islands
phylogeny
population genetics
Back to Top