Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2009 Growth of Male White-Tailed Deer: Consequences of Maternal Effects
Kevin L. Monteith, Lowell E. Schmitz, Jonathan A. Jenks, Joshua A. Delger, R. Terry Bowyer
Author Affiliations +

Identifying maternal effects on offspring is critical to interpreting population dynamics, but the duration of maternal effects and which life-history traits they influence is not well understood. We quantified growth and development of male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) originating from the Black Hills in southwestern South Dakota and from eastern South Dakota in a controlled environment with high-quality nutrition. Despite being in good nutritional condition, males from the Black Hills ceased rapid growth 41 days earlier, were 29% smaller at asymptotic body mass, and grew significantly smaller antlers than males from eastern South Dakota. Females from eastern South Dakota were 14.9 kg larger than females from the Black Hills, yet birth mass of male offspring was similar for females from the 2 regions. Male offspring of 1st-generation deer from the Black Hills attained a 30% larger asymptotic body mass and grew significantly larger antlers than their sires. Body mass and antler size of 2nd-generation males of Black Hills origin approached that of 1st-generation males from eastern South Dakota at maturity. Suppression in growth of 1st-generation males of the Black Hills and increased growth by their offspring supported an influence of maternal and grandmaternal condition during gestation on subsequent growth of offspring and highlighted the significance of nutrition during gestation. These intergenerational effects indicate that measures of animal condition and population performance might reflect past rather than current conditions, and illustrate the potential for time lags in responses of populations to improved environmental conditions.

Kevin L. Monteith, Lowell E. Schmitz, Jonathan A. Jenks, Joshua A. Delger, and R. Terry Bowyer "Growth of Male White-Tailed Deer: Consequences of Maternal Effects," Journal of Mammalogy 90(3), 651-660, (1 June 2009).
Received: 16 June 2008; Accepted: 1 November 2008; Published: 1 June 2009

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top