Translator Disclaimer
24 April 2020 Molecular Confirmation of a Fasciola Gigantica × Fasciola Hepatica Hybrid in a Chadian Bovine
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Fascioliasis is a zoonotic infection of humans and, more commonly, ruminants. It is caused by 2 liver fluke species, Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica, which differ in size. The traditional morphological methods used to distinguish the 2 species can be unreliable, particularly in the presence of hybrids between the 2 species. The development of advanced molecular methods has allowed for more definitive identification of Fasciola species, including their hybrids. Hybrids are of concern, as it is thought that they could acquire advantageous traits such as increased pathogenicity and host range. In 2013, we collected flukes from Fasciola-positive cattle, sheep, and goats slaughtered in 4 Chadian abattoirs. DNA from 27 flukes was extracted, amplified, and analyzed to identify species using the ITS1+2 locus. Twenty-six of the 27 flukes were identified as F. gigantica, while the remaining fluke showed heterozygosity at all variable sites that distinguish F. hepatica and F. gigantica. Cloning and sequencing of both alleles confirmed the presence of 1 F. hepatica and 1 F. gigantica allele. To our knowledge, this is the first unambiguous, molecular demonstration of the presence of such a hybrid in a bovine in sub-Saharan Africa.

Fascioliasis is a liver fluke infection affecting ruminants and occasionally humans that, while treatable, is difficult to diagnose. It is acquired by ingesting infective metacercariae on vegetation grown in contaminated water or ingesting the contaminated water itself (Andrews, 1999). Animal fascioliasis leads to economic loss because of reduced herd productivity resulting from diminished fertility, reduced production of wool and milk, and increased mortality (Bernardo et al., 2011). Spillover infections from animals to humans were, until recently, thought to occur only occasionally (Mas-Coma et al., 2009). However, studies suggest that the frequency of human cases is on the rise (WHO, 2015). Human infections, while seldom fatal, cause pain, liver and gallbladder damage, and injury to other organs in the case of ectopic migration (Lotfy and Hillyer, 2003; Fürst et al., 2012).

Fascioliasis is caused by 2 species of the genus Fasciola, namely, Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica (Mas-Coma et al., 2007). Distinguishing the 2 Fasciola species is often accomplished by morphometry or inferred from geography, but this is not reliable as there can be overlaps in the size of the 2 species and in their geographic range (Moazeni et al., 2012; Afshan et al., 2014). Advances in molecular methods now allow species identification and provide a powerful tool to identify potential hybrids (Agatsuma et al., 2000; Huang et al., 2004; Itagaki et al., 2005; Amor et al., 2011b; Shalaby et al., 2013).

Traditionally, it has been thought that F. hepatica exists in the temperate regions of the Americas, Europe, and Oceania, while F. gigantica is present across Africa and Asia. However, recent reports of F. hepatica in Africa and Asia have challenged these long-held beliefs (Agatsuma et al., 2000; Huang et al., 2004; Ali et al., 2008; Walker et al., 2008; Amer et al., 2011; Dar et al., 2012; Mucheka et al., 2015).

In Africa, F. hepatica has been confirmed by molecular analysis in Algeria (Farjallah et al., 2009), Ethiopia (Le et al., 2012), and Tunisia (Farjallah et al., 2009). Geographic co-occurrence (but not necessarily co-infection) of the 2 species has been genetically proven in Egypt (Amer et al., 2011; Dar et al., 2012), Niger (Ali et al., 2008), South Africa (Mucheka et al., 2015), Tanzania (Walker et al., 2008), and Zimbabwe (Mucheka et al., 2015). Further reports of F. hepatica from Africa based on morphology have been published from Côte d'Ivoire (Utzinger et al., 2010), Ethiopia (Abebe, 2010), Kenya (Ogambo-Ongoma, 1969), and Morocco (Khallaayoune et al., 1991). Fasciola gigantica has been documented at Lake Chad (Jean-Richard et al., 2014), but, to date, neither F. hepatica nor hybrids have been detected in Chad.

Given that F. hepatica is present in a few African countries and that it is difficult to distinguish from F. gigantica by clinical, coprological, or immunological methods (Mas-Coma et al., 2005), it is conceivable that F. hepatica has merely been overlooked across Africa, including Chad. Furthermore, morphology as a method for species determination has not been rigorously tested in Africa, and hence, Fasciola species may have been misidentified. The presence of hybrids complicates matters further (Itagaki et al., 1998; Valero et al., 2005; Inoue et al., 2007; Afshan et al., 2014).

There have been repeated reports of hybrids (or ‘intermediate forms') of F. gigantica and F. hepatica in regions where both species are present (Agatsuma et al., 2000; Huang et al., 2004; Itagaki et al., 2005; Amor et al., 2011b; Shalaby et al., 2013). Hybrids have been reported by molecular means in Egypt (Amer et al., 2011), Islamic Republic of Iran (Amor et al., 2011b), Japan (Itagaki et al., 2005), Korea (Agatsuma et al., 2000), Pakistan (Mufti et al., 2014), People's Republic of China (Huang et al., 2004; Peng et al., 2009), Saudi Arabia (Shalaby et al., 2013), Thailand (Wannasan et al., 2014), and Vietnam (Nguyen et al., 2012). Hybrid forms, as determined by morphology, have been reported in Bangladesh (Ahasan et al., 2016), Egypt (Periago et al., 2008), Islamic Republic of Iran (Ashrafi et al., 2006), and Pakistan (Afshan et al., 2014). These reports are of interest because F. hepatica flukes have shown considerable adaptability to new hosts, both intermediate and definitive, environmental conditions, and pharmaceutical treatments (most importantly triclabendazole) raising concerns that hybrid forms may have greater propensity for geographic and host expansion (Seehausen, 2004; Walker et al., 2008; Cwiklinski et al., 2015).

Species-specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the nuclear ribosomal DNA are commonly used to differentiate Fasciola species. Previous investigations have identified up to 16 polymorphic positions in the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and ITS2 (ITS1+2) marker; 11 of these are commonly used to distinguish F. hepatica from F. gigantica (Ali et al., 2008; Itagaki et al., 2009; Amor et al., 2011a, 2011b; Liu et al., 2014; Chaudhry et al., 2016).

In the current investigation, 27 adult Fasciola flukes, collected from 19 slaughtered livestock in Chad, were molecularly characterized using the ITS1+2 nuclear marker to confirm species and any hybrid forms (Itagaki et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2014). This analysis of Chadian Fasciola was part of a larger phylogenetic investigation that included Ivorian and Swiss Fasciola specimens.

Liver flukes were collected from the carcasses of 24 cattle, 2 goats, and 1 sheep during post-mortem inspection at 4 abattoirs located on the shores of Lake Chad (Bol, Gredaya, and Sidjé) and at 1 abattoir in N'Djamena, the capital of Chad, in 2013. All work was done in accordance with Chadian ethical regulations.

After collection, the flukes were rinsed with sterile water, put in 96% ethanol, and stored at room temperature. In June 2015, the samples were re-preserved for shipping to Switzerland. Twenty-three of the 27 samples were shipped in 96% ethanol, however, 3 (TCDF050, TCDF062.02, and TCDF082) were shipped in neutral buffered 10% formalin (stored for 29 days in formalin). Upon arrival, all flukes were rinsed with double distilled water and fully immersed in 96% ethanol.

Approximately one-quarter of each fluke was cut with a new or bleached scalpel blade and deposited into a lysis solution of 50 mM Tris, 1% SDS and proteinase K, then incubated at 56 C for 12–14 hr with agitation. DNeasy column kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) were used for DNA extraction, adhering to the manufacturer's protocol with the exception of adjusting the amount of lysis solution and proteinase K. Chadian flukes did not necessarily lyse within 24 hr; therefore, more lysis solution was added (up to 380 µl lysis solution and 20 µl proteinase K) and the flukes were left at 56 C until they were fully lysed (up to 25 hr).

The combined ITS1+2 region of 27 Chadian flukes was amplified in 10 µl polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) containing 1 µl of Buffer BD 10×, 1.6 µl MgCl2 25 mM, 0.2 µl 10 mM dNTP mix (2.5 mM of each dNTP), 0.4 µl of each 10 mM primer (BD1, forward: 5′-GTCGTAACAAGGTTTCCGTA-3′, and BD2, reverse: 5′-TATGCTTAAATTCAGCGGGT-3′) (Luton et al., 1992), 0.2 µl of FIREPol 5 U/µl (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia), 1 µl of DNA, and 5.2 µl of sterile water. The PCR protocol was initiated by 3 min at 94 C; followed by 45 cycles of 40 sec at 94 C, 45 sec at 60 C, and 1.5 min at 72 C; followed by a final extension step of 5 min at 72 C.

The PCR products were loaded onto 0.8% agarose (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) gels with 1× TAE (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts) and run at 50 V for 20 min. Multiple bands were produced, and the band of the correct length, 1,000 base pairs (bp), was excised from the gel for sequencing. The Wizardt SV gel and PCR cleanup system (Promega) was used for gel cleanup. Finally, PCR products were sent to Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland) for uni-directional Sanger sequencing using the BD1 primer. The sequence was compared to sequences deposited in GenBank using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (National Center for Biotechnology Information) and matched F. gigantica ITS1+2 sequences.

The PCR of the ITS1+2 loci produced sequences of 970 bp. The sequences from the 27 specimens were aligned and analyzed using CodonCode Aligner version 6.0.2 (CodonCode Corporation, Centerville, Massachusetts). Thirteen SNPs were observed, 11 of those were from known species determining variable sites, plus another 2 sites at positions 107 (3 samples) and 413 (2 samples). These 2 SNPs were heterozygous (R and W, respectively) and did not differ between Fasciola species.

Twenty-six of the 27 specimens (96%) conformed to the pattern associated with F. gigantica at 10 of the 11 ITS species-specific variable sites (GenBank accession nos. MK321604-07, MK321610, MK321614-20, MK321623-26, MK321629-32, MK321634, MK321636, MK321639, and MK321641-43). The exception, specimen TCDF062.02 from a bovine, exhibited heterozygosity at 9 of the 11 sites and a sudden breakdown of the clean sequence after the insertion/deletion (indel) at position 911. This breakdown is the hallmark of a heterozygous variable site, which instead of having a nucleotide mutation has an indel in 1 of the 2 alleles. The Sanger sequence chromatogram for sample TCDF062.02 (Fig. 1) illustrates the sudden breakdown of a clean sequence at a specific bp (position 911, as indicated by the vertical line through the chromatogram). This observation and the heterozygous variable sites indicated that the specimen could be a hybrid. To confirm that there was an F. gigantica and an F. hepatica allele, the DNA of specimen TCDF062.02 was cloned using a Gibson assembly, and the clones were sequenced (see Suppl. Data for the methods) (Gibson et al., 2009).

Figure 1.

A section of the ITS1+2 Sanger sequence chromatogram from Chadian Fasciola hepatica × Fasciola gigantica hybrid sample TCDF062.02. The vertical line indicates the breakdown of the clean sequence at position 911 due to a deletion in 1 of the alleles. Color version available online.

img-z3-1_316.jpg

Minor SNPs in individual sequences from the clones were due to the Taq polymerase used, and hence, a consensus sequence was built and it revealed heterozygosity at 10 of the 11 variable sites. Thirteen clones were sequenced, 1 group (6 clones) matched the expected pattern for F. hepatica (GenBank accession no. MK321644) and the other group (6 clones) matched the pattern for F. gigantica (GenBank accession no. MK321645), confirming that this specimen is a hybrid between the 2 species.

A second larger analysis of the 11 species determining variable sites was performed using the sequences from all 27 Chadian specimens, in addition to sequences from Ivorian and Swiss specimens and sequences retrieved from GenBank (Table I). It revealed that 1 of the species determining variable sites, position 791, proved problematic for species determination in F. gigantica. While this site seems to be “T” consistently in F. hepatica specimens, it appears to vary geographically in F. gigantica flukes.

Table I

Comparison of nucleotides at 11 variable positions of the ITS1/2 marker of Fasciola samples collected from Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, and Switzerland and sequences deposited in NCBI GenBank. Abbreviations: n/a, no sequence for this part. Y and W indicate heterozygous positions with nucleotides C/T and A/T, respectively.

img-z4-2_316.gif

Twenty-six of 27 Fasciola flukes collected from cattle, goats, and sheep in Chad were found to be F. gigantica when analyzed using the 11 species determining variables sites. One specimen, from a bovine, was heterozygous at these sites, and cloning revealed alleles from the 2 Fasciola species. It was the only specimen from this bovine included in this analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first unambiguous proof of the occurrence of Fasciola hybrids in sub-Saharan Africa and only the second report from Africa. Hybrids have been detected in Egypt (in a buffalo) and in Saudi Arabia (in a goat); however, the goat was imported from Sudan, and it is not known if the hybrid came from Saudi Arabia or Sudan (Amer et al., 2011; Shalaby et al., 2013). There are only a few publications that used advanced molecular methods to determine species of African Fasciola, and only 5 sequences are currently available in GenBank. Therefore, the absence of reports of sub-Saharan African hybrids could be due to a paucity of prior investigations.

The hybrid fluke was taken from a cow that belonged to the semi-nomadic ethnic community of Arabs, who, at the end of the dry season, when the pastures around their villages are depleted, bring their livestock to the shores of Lake Chad for grazing (Weibel et al., 2008; Jean-Richard et al., 2014; Greter et al., 2017). At this time, Lake Chad is home to a large population of mobile pastoralists who travel hundreds of kilometers throughout the Sahelian region each year in search of forage. Jean-Richard et al. (2014) and Greter et al. (2017) found the prevalence of fascioliasis in cattle around Lake Chad is high (68% and 31% in slaughtered and live cattle, respectively). Presumably, these mobile livestock are picking-up Fasciola parasites and depositing their eggs along the migration route, including at Lake Chad. As the Arab cattle are exposed to Lake Chad, and the mobile livestock there have likely contaminated the area with Fasciola from throughout the Sahel, it is difficult to know with any certainty where this hybrid originated.

Site 791 of the ITS1+2 marker has been included in a panel of 11 variable sites for distinguishing species of Fasciola in prior publications. The consensus in the literature is that F. gigantica should present a “C” at this site; however, this appears to be true only for F. gigantica from Asia and Niger. All F. gigantica samples and the hybrid from our investigation, as well as 3 out of 5 sequences from African F. gigantica (GenBank accession nos. EF612484, AB010976, and AJ853848) showed a homozygous “T” at this position (although sequence AJ853848 was incorrectly reported as “C” in Liu et al. 2014). The 2 sequences from Niger (GenBank accession nos. AM900371, AM850108) showed “C.” Fasciola gigantica from the Middle East and Northern Africa also consistently show a “T” at this site, indicating that site 791 is not a reliable marker for distinguishing the 2 species.

There are several limitations to our investigation, which are offered for discussion. While there are a number of publications reporting the species of Fasciola found in Africa, many of them do not use the same method to determine species (morphology, molecular methods, or different molecular markers). Consequently, there are only a few ITS1+2 sequences currently available from African Fasciola. Furthermore, among those publications that use ITS1+2, there are differences in the approach to the variable sites. Some studies use only one of the ITS1+2 markers (only ITS1 or ITS2), while others include more variable sites than those mentioned here (Ali et al., 2008; Itagaki et al., 2009; Amer et al., 2011; Choe et al., 2011). The reason for these differences is not clear, as there appear to be only 10 sites that reliably distinguish F. gigantica from F. hepatica; the 11 reported here minus site 791.

Despite our efforts to obtain a mitochondrial sequence for the hybrid, the sequence was of very poor quality. This may be due to the fact that the specimen was exposed to formalin. Formalin degrades DNA by causing cross-linking between nucleic acids and proteins, which can affect the success of PCR amplification (Vitošević et al., 2018). However, the 3 samples in this investigation that were exposed to formalin amplified in the ITS1+2 PCR well. Furthermore, only 1 hybrid was found in this relatively small sample. Larger sample size may reveal more hybrids and strengthen the case for hybrids in Chad and perhaps elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa.

Table I lists ITS1+2 sequences deposited in GenBank, although it is not a comprehensive list of all Fasciola ITS1+2 sequences available in GenBank. Some samples were not included due to unclear descriptive information. For example, a number of sequences were labeled in GenBank as Fasciola spp., although the meaning of this is neither clear nor consistent among samples. In addition, not all studies have used the same method or loci to determine species and, as mentioned previously, some analyses have reported sequences incorrectly. These issues limit our ability to compare specimens from other investigations and underscore the meticulous nature of sequence analysis work. Further investigations from different parts of sub-Saharan Africa with larger sample sizes than reported here are warranted to provide better resolution concerning which species are present in Africa and where exactly they are located.

Fasciola hepatica has been found to adapt quickly to external selection pressures such as new hosts, new environments, and medications leading to a selective advantage (Walker et al., 2008; Cwiklinski et al., 2015). Hybrids of F. gigantica and F. hepatica are of considerable concern as they may have increased adaptability, allowing them to expand their geographic and host range as well as acquire increased resistance to medications. This poses a threat to animal and human health as well as animal production industries in areas that are endemic for fascioliasis, particularly in resource-constrained settings where prevention and control strategies may be difficult to implement and sustain.

The authors assert all applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. We would like to thank Prof. Marcel Tanner, Dr. Fayiz Abakar, Dr. Monique Léchenne, and Dr. Esther Schelling who collected, prepared, and organized transportation of flukes. We are grateful to Prof. Pascal Mäser, Christina Kunz Renggli, Monica Cal, and Dr. Anna Fesser, who kindly shared their expertise and laboratory facilities, and Prof. Walter Salzburger and Dr. Sandrine Picq for their support and guidance. We acknowledge financial support from the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 31003A_1710113 to Jürg Utzinger and Jakob Zinsstag and grant BSCGI0_157729 to Till S. Voss).

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Abebe, R., F. Abunna, M. Berhane, S. Mekuria, B. Megersa, and A. Regassa. 2010. Fasciolosis: Prevalence, financial losses due to liver condemnation and evaluation of a simple sedimentation diagnostic technique in cattle slaughtered at Hawassa Municipal abattoir, southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal 14: 39–51. Google Scholar

2.

Afshan, K., M. A. Valero, M. Qayyum, R. V. Peixoto, A. Magraner, and S. Mas-Coma. 2014. Phenotypes of intermediate forms of Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica in buffaloes from Central Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Helminthology 88: 417–426. Google Scholar

3.

Agatsuma, T., Y. Arakawa, M. Iwagami, Y. Honzako, U. Cahyaningsih, S. Y. Kang, and S. J. Hong. 2000. Molecular evidence of natural hybridization between Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica. Parasitology International 49: 231–238. Google Scholar

4.

Ahasan, S. A., M. A. Valero, E. H. Chowdhury, M. T. Islam, M. R. Islam, M. M. Hussain Mondal, R. V. Peixoto, L. Berinde, M. Panova, and S. Mas-Coma. 2016. CIAS detection of Fasciola hepatica/F. gigantica intermediate forms in bovines from Bangladesh. Acta Parasitologica 61: 267–277. Google Scholar

5.

Ali, H., L. Ai, H. Q. Song, S. Ali, R. Q. Lin, B. Seyni, G. Issa, and X. Q. Zhu. 2008. Genetic characterisation of Fasciola samples from different host species and geographical localities revealed the existence of F. hepatica and F. gigantica in Niger. Parasitology Research 102: 1021–1024. Google Scholar

6.

Amer, S., Y. Dar, M. Ichikawa, Y. Fukuda, C. Tada, T. Itagaki, and Y. Nakai. 2011. Identification of Fasciola species isolated from Egypt based on sequence analysis of genomic (ITS1 and ITS2) and mitochondrial (NDI and COI) gene markers. Parasitology International 60: 5–12. Google Scholar

7.

Amor, N., S. Farjallah, M. Salem, D. M. Lamine, P. Merella, K. Said, and B. Ben Slimane. 2011a. Molecular characterization of Fasciola gigantica from Mauritania based on mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Experimental Parasitology 129: 127–136. Google Scholar

8.

Amor, N., A. Halajian, S. Farjallah, P. Merella, K. Said, and B. Ben Slimane. 2011b. Molecular characterization of Fasciola spp. from the endemic area of northern Iran based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Experimental Parasitology 128: 196–204. Google Scholar

9.

Andrews, S. J. 1999. The life cycle of Fasciola hepatica. In Fasciolosis, J. Dalton (ed.). CAB International Publications, Cambridge, U.K., p. 1–29. Google Scholar

10.

Ashrafi, K., M. A. Valero, M. Panova, M. V. Periago, J. Massoud, and S. Mas-Coma. 2006. Phenotypic analysis of adults of Fasciola hepatica, Fasciola gigantica and intermediate forms from the endemic region of Gilan, Iran. Parasitology International 55: 249–260. Google Scholar

11.

Bernardo, C. C., M. B. Carneiro, B. R. De Avelar, D. M. Donatele, I. V. F. Martins, and M. J. S. Pereira. 2011. Prevalence of liver condemnation due to bovine fasciolosis in Southern Espírito Santo: Temporal distribution and economic losses. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 20: 49–53. Google Scholar

12.

Chaudhry, U., B. Van Paridon, M. Z. Shabbir, M. Shafee, K. Ashraf, T. Yaqub, and J. Gilleard. 2016. Molecular evidence shows that the liver fluke Fasciola gigantica is the predominant Fasciola species in ruminants from Pakistan. Journal of Helminthology 90: 206–213. Google Scholar

13.

Choe, S. E., T. T. D. Nguyen, T. G. Kang, C. H. Kweon, and S. W. Kang. 2011. Genetic analysis of Fasciola isolates from cattle in Korea based on second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-2) sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Parasitology Research 109: 833–839. Google Scholar

14.

Cwiklinski, K., J. P. Dalton, P. J. Dufresne, J. La Course, D. J. Williams, J. Hodgkinson, and S. Paterson. 2015. The Fasciola hepatica genome: Gene duplication and polymorphism reveals adaptation to the host environment and the capacity for rapid evolution. Genome Biology 16: 71–83. Google Scholar

15.

Dar, Y., S. Amer, A. Mercier, B. Courtioux, and G. Dreyfuss. 2012. Molecular identification of Fasciola spp. (Digenea: Fasciolidae) in Egypt. Parasite 19: 177–182. Google Scholar

16.

Farjallah, S., D. Sanna, N. Amor, B. B. Mehel, M. C. Piras, P. Merella, C. Marco, M. Curini-Galletti, K. Said, and G. Giovanni. 2009. Genetic characterization of Fasciola hepatica from Tunisia and Algeria based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Parasitology Research 105: 1617–1621. Google Scholar

17.

Fürst, T., S. Sayasone, P. Odermatt, J. Keiser, and J. Utzinger. 2012. Manifestation, diagnosis, and management of foodborne trematodiasis. BMJ 344: e4093. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.e4093Google Scholar

18.

Gibson, D. G., L. Young, R. Y. Chuang, J. C. Venter, C. A. Hutchison, and H. O. Smith. 2009. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nature Methods 6: 343–345. Google Scholar

19.

Greter, H., A. A. Batil, B. N. Ngandolo, I. O. Alfaroukh, D. D. Moto, J. Hattendorf, J. Utzinger, and J. Zinsstag. 2017. Human and livestock trematode infections in a mobile pastoralist setting at Lake Chad: Added value of a one health approach beyond zoonotic diseases research. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 111: 278–284. Google Scholar

20.

Huang, W., B. He, C. Wang, and X. Zhu. 2004. Characterisation of Fasciola species from mainland China by ITS-2 ribosomal DNA sequence. Veterinary Parasitology 120: 75–83. Google Scholar

21.

Inoue, K., H. Kanemasa, K. Inoue, M. Matsumoto, Y. Kajita, S. Mitsufuji, K. Kataoka, T. Okanoue, M. Yamada, R. Uchikawa, ET AL. 2007. A case of human fasciolosis: Discrepancy between egg size and genotype of Fasciola sp. Parasitology Research 100: 665–667. Google Scholar

22.

Itagaki, T., M. Kikawa, K. Sakaguchi, J. Shimo, K. Terasaki, T. Shibahara, and K. Fukuda. 2005. Genetic characterization of parthenogenic Fasciola sp. in Japan on the basis of the sequences of ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology 131: 679–685. Google Scholar

23.

Itagaki, T., K. Sakaguchi, K. Terasaki, O. Sasaki, S. Yoshihara, and T. Van Dung. 2009. Occurrence of spermic diploid and aspermic triploid forms of Fasciola in Vietnam and their molecular characterization based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology International 58: 81–85. Google Scholar

24.

Itagaki, T., K. Tsutsumi, K. Ito, and Y. Tsutsumi. 1998. Taxonomic status of the Japanese triploid forms of Fasciola: Comparison of mitochondrial ND1 and COI sequences with F. hepatica and F. gigantica. Journal of Parasitology 84: 445–448. Google Scholar

25.

Jean-Richard, V., L. Crump, A. A. Abicho, N. B. Naré, H. Greter, J. Hattendorf, E. Schelling, and J. Zinsstag. 2014. Prevalence of Fasciola gigantica infection in slaughtered animals in south-eastern Lake Chad area in relation to husbandry practices and seasonal water levels. BMC Veterinary Research 10: 81–87. Google Scholar

26.

Khallaayoune, K., B. E. Stromberg, A. Dakkak, and J. B. Malone. 1991. Seasonal dynamics of Fasciola hepatica burdens in grazing timahdit sheep in Morocco. International Journal for Parasitology 21: 307–314. Google Scholar

27.

Le, T. H., K. T. Nguyen, N. T. B. Nguyen, H. T. T. Doan, X. T. K. Le, C. T. M. Hoang, and N. V. De. 2012. Development and evaluation of a single-step duplex PCR for simultaneous detection of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica (family Fasciolidae, class Trematoda, phylum Platyhelminthes). Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50: 2720–2726. Google Scholar

28.

Liu, G. H., R. B. Gasser, N. D. Young, H. Q. Song, L. Ai, and X. Q. Zhu. 2014. Complete mitochondrial genomes of the “intermediate form” of Fasciola and Fasciola gigantica, and their comparison with F. hepatica. Parasites & Vectors 7: 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-150Google Scholar

29.

Lotfy, W., and G. V. Hillyer. 2003. Fasciola species in Egypt. Experimental Pathology and Parasitology 6: 9–22. Google Scholar

30.

Luton, K., D. Walker, and D. Blair. 1992. Comparisons of ribosomal internal transcribed spacers from two congeneric species of flukes (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Digenea). Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 56: 323–327. Google Scholar

31.

Mas-Coma, S., M. D. Bargues, and M. A. Valero. 2005. Fascioliasis and other plant-borne trematode zoonoses. International Journal for Parasitology 35: 1255–1278. Google Scholar

32.

Mas-Coma, S., M. D. Bargues, and M. A. Valero. 2007. Plant-borne trematode zoonoses: Fascioliasis and fasciolopsiasis. In Food-borne parasitic zoonoses: Fish and plant-borne parasites, World class parasites, Vol. II, K. Darwin Murrell and B. Fried (eds.). Springer Science, New York, p. 293–334. Google Scholar

33.

Mas-Coma, S., M. A. Valero, and M. D. Bargues. 2009. Fasciola, Lymnaeids and human fascioliasis with a global overview on disease transmission, epidemiology, evolutionary genetics, molecular epidemiology and control. Advances in Parasitology 69: 41–146. Google Scholar

34.

Moazeni, M., H. Sharifiyazdi, and A. Izadpanah. 2012. Characterization of Fasciola hepatica genotypes from cattle and sheep in Iran using cytochrome C oxidase gene (CO1). Parasitology Research 110: 2379–2384. Google Scholar

35.

Mucheka, V., J. Lamb, D. Pfukenyi, and S. Mukaratirwa. 2015. DNA sequence analyses reveal co-occurrence of novel haplotypes of Fasciola gigantica with F. hepatica in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Veterinary Parasitology 214: 144–151. Google Scholar

36.

Mufti, S., K. Afshan, I. A. Khan, Y. Zafar, S. S. R. Rizvi, F. Nazir, and M. Qayyum. 2014. Genetic characterization of Fasciola samples from bovine hosts in Pakistan by sequences of ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 34: 361–366. Google Scholar

37.

Nguyen, S., S. Amer, M. Ichikawa, T. Itagaki, Y. Fukuda, and Y. Nakai. 2012. Molecular identification of Fasciola spp. (Digenea: Platyhelminthes) in cattle from Vietnam. Parasite 19: 85–89. Google Scholar

38.

Ogambo-Ongoma, A. H. 1969. The incidence of Fasciola hepatica Linnaeus, 1758, in Kenya cattle. Bulletin of Epizootic Diseases of Africa 17: 429–431. Google Scholar

39.

Peng, M., M. Ichinomiya, M. Ohtori, M. Ichikawa, T. Shibahara, and T. Itagaki. 2009. Molecular characterization of Fasciola hepatica, Fasciola gigantica, and aspermic Fasciola sp. in China based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology Research 105: 809–815. Google Scholar

40.

Periago, M. V., M. A. Valero, M. El Sayed, K. Ashrafi, A. El Wakeel, M. Y. Mohamed, M. Desquesnes, F. Curtale, and S. Mas-Coma. 2008. First phenotypic description of Fasciola hepatica/Fasciola gigantica intermediate forms from the human endemic area of the Nile Delta, Egypt. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 8: 51–58. Google Scholar

41.

Seehausen, O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 198–207. Google Scholar

42.

Shalaby, I., Y. Gherbawy, and A. Banaja. 2013. Molecular characterization of Fasciola species isolated from imported sheep in Taif region (Saudi Arabia). Tropical Biomedicine 30: 15–26. Google Scholar

43.

Utzinger, J., S. Botero-Kleiven, F. Castelli, P. L. Chiodini, H. Edwards, N. Köhler, M. Gulletta, M. Lebbad, M. Manser, B. Matthys, ET AL. 2010. Microscopic diagnosis of sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin-fixed stool samples for helminths and intestinal protozoa: A comparison among European reference laboratories. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 16: 267–273. Google Scholar

44.

Valero, M. A., M. Panova, and S. Mas-Coma. 2005. Phenotypic analysis of adults and eggs of Fasciola hepatica by computer image analysis system. Journal of Helminthology 79: 217–225. Google Scholar

45.

Vitošević, K., M. Todorović, T. Varljen, Ž. Slovie, S. Matić, and D. Todorović. 2018. Effect of formalin fixation on PCR amplification of DNA isolated from healthy autopsy tissues. Acta Histochemica 120: 780–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2018. 09.005Google Scholar

46.

Walker S. M., A. E. Makundi, F. V. Namuba, A. A. Kassuku, J. Keyyu, E. M. Hoey, P. Prödohl, J. R. Stothard, and A. Trudgett. 2008. The distribution of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica within southern Tanzania—Constraints associated with the intermediate host. Parasitology 135: 495–503. Google Scholar

47.

Wannasan, A., P. Khositharattanakool, P. Chaiwong, S. Piangjai, P. Uparanukraw, and N. Morakote. 2014. Identification of Fasciola species based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA reveals the co-existence of intermediate Fasciola and Fasciola gigantica in Thailand. Experimental Parasitology 146: 64–70. Google Scholar

48.

Weibel, D., E. Schelling, B. Bonfoh, J. Utzinger, J. Hattendorf, M. Abdoulaye, T. Madjiade, and J. Zinsstag. 2008. Demographic and health surveillance of mobile pastoralists in Chad: Integration of biometric fingerprint identification into a geographical information system. Geospatial Health 3: 113–124. Google Scholar

49.

WHO. 2015. Foodborne trematode infections, World Health Organization. Available at:  http://www.who.int/foodborne_trematode_infections/en/. Accessed 22 February 2015. Google Scholar
© American Society of Parasitologists 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jennifer Giovanoli Evack, Remo S. Schmidt, Sylwia D. Boltryk, Till S. Voss, Annour A. Batil, Bongo N. Ngandolo, Helena Greter, Jürg Utzinger, Jakob Zinsstag, and Oliver Balmer "Molecular Confirmation of a Fasciola Gigantica × Fasciola Hepatica Hybrid in a Chadian Bovine," Journal of Parasitology 106(2), 316-322, (24 April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1645/19-66
Published: 24 April 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top