Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
7 September 2023 The supposedly well-known carbonate indicator Tortella tortuosa (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) split into eight species in Europe
Heribert Köckinger, Lars Hedenäs
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We present a first treatment of the Tortella tortuosa complex for Europe. We analysed molecular relationships based on the nuclear ITS and the plastid atpB-rbcL and rps4 in a network context and thereafter characterized the identified entities by their morphology. We found eight morphologically and molecularly distinct entities at the species level, which are also supported in ASAP analyses of the molecular data; one species includes two varieties. In some cases, nuclear and plastid data suggest different relationships and we found a few likely recent hybrid collections. To the main characters of taxonomic importance belong stem anatomy, leaf shape and papillosity. We describe three species as new: T. commutata (a widespread plant; including the new var. valida), T. dolomitica (known only from the Alps) and T. splendida (an Arctic-alpine element), replacing T. arctica auct. For T. angustifolia and T. robusta (both montane) new combinations at the species level are provided. Tortella bambergeri (a submediterranean element), T. fleischeri (an Alpine element, recurring in Scotland) and T. tortuosa s. str. (widespread) complete this informal group of morphologically similar and partly related species. The species differ in ecological requirements and distribution areas, although mixed stands of two or three species are frequent. The area richest in species in Europe is the Alps with all eight species, whereas we found only four from Scandinavia.

Introduction

Tortella tortuosa (Hedw.) Limpr. is considered one of the main indicator species for calcareous habitats and occurs widespread over much of the Northern Hemisphere. Even a significant number of non-bryologists recognize this moss species, which is quite unusual. In Europe, it is known to be highly variable, with many intraspecific taxa described, whereas it is regarded much less variable outside the continent. Eckel (1998) asked, clairvoyant: “‘But how is it that North American T. tortuosa has been reported as so uniform in its characteristics throughout the continent, and can this fact contribute to resolving some European problems by assuring systematists that some of the European infraspecific taxa are, in fact, species?”’ Despite the beauty and conspicuousness of these plants, a thorough taxonomic study on its variability in Europe has never been carried out.

Tortella (Müll.Hal.) Limpr. has been regarded a sufficiently explored genus in Europe and therefore treated as an orphan by bryophyte taxonomists for a rather long time. The detailed revision of the genus for North America by Eckel (1998) brought a fresh impetus, although she applied a rather conservative, wide species concept. Tortella fragilis (Drumm.) Limpr. has hitherto been a poorly defined species in Europe which included also hidden elements, like T. alpicola Dixon. Based on Eckel´s clear circumscription of both taxa, the latter species was subsequently also recognized as an element of the European moss flora (Otnyukova et al. 2004, Rams et al. 2006, Köckinger et al. 2008, Dirkse and Losada-Lima 2012, Hassel and Høitomt 2013). Some years ago, the application of molecular techniques opened a new chapter in the taxonomy of the genus. Werner et al. (2005) provided a first insight into the phylogeny of Tortella. Subsequently, molecular data helped to circumscribe the genus [Trichostomum arcticum Kaal. was included (Werner et al. 2014)] and to understand a critical group [T. bambergeri auct. non Schimp. was shown to consist of two species (Köckinger and Hedenäs 2017)]. Recently, a new species, T. mediterranea Köckinger, Lüth, O.Werner & Ros, was also described (Köckinger et al. 2018).

We here present a comprehensive revision of the ‘T. tortuosa-complex’ in Europe and pragmatically cover everything that has been included in the species´ circumscription in recent years. We base our revision on molecular evidence in combination with a thorough morphological study, as well as extensive type studies. We include T. arctica (Arnell) Crundw. & Nyholm as understood by Eckel (1998), who treated it at varietal rank within T. tortuosa. This informal complex of similar and partly related species (see beginning of the Taxonomy part for a more exact circumscription) is not synonymous with the ‘T. tortuosa group’ outlined in Köckinger et al. (2018) on phylogenetic evidence, containing also T. fragilis, T. pseudofragilis (Thér.) Köckinger & Hedenäs, T. rigens Alberts., T. inclinata (R.Hedw.) Limpr. and T. densa (Lorentz & Molendo) Crundw. & Nyholm.

Material and methods

Molecular methods

In total, 99 Tortella tortuosa complex specimens were included in the molecular portion of this study, including 72 specimens that were included in earlier Tortella studies by the authors (Hedenäs 2015, 2019, Köckinger and Hedenäs 2017), five specimens which sequences were downloaded from GenBank and 22 specimens which sequences were newly generated for the present study (Appendix 1). From Sweden all morphologically studied specimens were also molecularly studied. From Austria, we carefully selected the samples to sequence among the morphological variation observed in this country. The sampling, which furthermore includes a few specimens from Canada, Italy and the United Kingdom, includes all major T. tortuosa complex environments as well as its morphological variation in Europe. Based on Hedenäs (2015), Köckinger and Hedenäs (2017) and Köckinger et al. (2018) several other Tortella species were selected as outgroup: T. alpicola (1 specimen), T. densa (3), T. fasciculata (Culm.) Culm. (3), T. fragilis (7), T. inclinata (5), T. pseudofragilis (2) and T. spitsbergensis (Bizot & Thér.) O.Werner, Köckinger & Ros (1). Although our study focusses on Europe, some of the sequences downloaded from GenBank come from non-European specimens.

We studied the nuclear internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 (ITS) and the plastid atpB-rbcL spacer (atpB-rbcL) and the rps4 gene + trnS-rps4 spacer (rps4). The new sequences were generated as described by Hedenäs (2015). In the final data set, all three sequences were available for all species except T. alpicola and T. spitsbergensis, for which rps4 was missing.

Nucleotide sequence fragments were edited and assembled for each DNA region using PhyDE® 0.9971 ( www.phyde.de/index.html; accessed 22 November 2018). The assembled sequences were aligned manually in PhyDE®. Regions of partially incomplete data in the beginning and end of the sequences were identified and were excluded from subsequent analyses. Gaps were coded using the simple indel coding of Simmons and Ochoterena (2000) in SeqState (Müller 2005). Gaps provided additional evidence to distinguish haplotypes and this information was included in the analyses. The sequence alignments used in the analyses are uploaded at doi: 10.5061/dryad.ngflvhj0b GenBank accession numbers are listed in Appendix 1.

Paralogous ITS haplotypes are sometimes encountered in bryophytes (Košnar et al. 2012, Hedenäs et al. 2019), but have so far not been reported in Tortella. The ITS chromatograms included in this study did not show ‘messy’ patterns or noise that could suggest paralogy, and the 5.8S gene was invariable among all samples (cf. Shaw et al. 2002, Feliner and Rosselló 2007). Therefore, the revealed limited ITS variation was interpreted as being among homologous haplotypes.

Preliminary NeighborNet (NN) split network analyses with SplitsTree ver. 4.12.6 (Huson and Bryant 2006) showed that networks based on ITS and plastid data, respectively, place a few specimens among members of different species in the two data sets. Thus, the two data sets provide incongruent results, and in addition reticulation is frequent. Therefore, we ran the final analyses separately for ITS and plastid data, and generated NN split networks using SplitsTree 4.12.6. Jacknife analyses (1000 replications) were performed with the program TNT (Goloboff et al. 2003) to test whether there exist supported lineages in a tree context.

To further evaluate our results concerning the molecular and morphological entities we recognize, we tested for molecularly defined groups based on either ITS or plastid data in the online Assemble species by automatic partitioning (ASAP) tool (Puillandre et al. 2019,  https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/; accessed 20 March 2023) using the default settings.

Morphological methods

The morphological study is predominantly based on extensive fieldwork collecting in Austria (HK) and Sweden (LH). In particular for the Alps the use of the mixed stand method proved highly valuable in the T. tortuosa complex since species often occur together. Much additional material was seen from many other countries of central, western, northern and southern Europe but large-scale herbarium revisions were not carried out. The distribution areas of the treated taxa are therefore only roughly outlined. Nevertheless, more than 1000 specimens were studied in the compound microscope. Type material was borrowed from B, BM, CHUR, GLAM, H, M, PC, PR, RO and W, or studied at the institutions (G, GJO, GZU, S and UPS). Only a few less important types of varietal rank could not be located or were not reachable. Invalidly described names were not traced.

Results

Molecular relationships

The total number of aligned ITS sites in the 99 studied T. tortuosa complex specimens, and 22 outgroup specimens, after deletion of regions at the beginnings and ends that were incomplete for some specimens, was 781. Of these, 54 were variable (35 in the T. tortuosa complex), and 27 (15) parsimony-informative; 41 (26) indels were present, with 28 (15) parsimony-informative. For atpB-rbcL the length was 565, 21 (12) sites were variable, and 17 (11) parsimony-informative; 15 (10) indels with 14 (9) parsimony-informative. For rps4 (sequences for T. alpicola and T. spitsbergensis missing) the length was 602, 15 (12) sites were variable, and 12 (9) parsimony-informative; 1 (0) indels with 0 (0) parsimony-informative. The sequence lengths for the T. tortuosa complex species accepted in this paper, as well as for the outgroup species are provided in Table 1.

Due to the unexpected number of entities occurring in Austria, the number of specimens per molecularly identified entity was in some cases relatively small. This was compensated by thorough morphological comparisons and field observations of numerous additional specimens to make certain that our conclusions were correct. Both ITS and plastid data reveal that the T. tortuosa complex is not monophyletic, but that it consists of eight entities (Fig. 1, 2). Because we recognize the eight entities within the T. tortuosa complex at the species level, we will from now on use their species names to facilitate the presentation of the results and the later discussion. All eight species are distinct in both the ITS and plastid networks, and two of them, T. angustifolia and T. dolomitica, receive ITS Jacknife supports of 84 and 94, respectively. These support values are similar to those of some of the included Tortella species outside the T. tortuosa complex. Both data sets suggest that T. fleischeri and T. tortuosa s.str. are relatively closely related to each other, like T. densa plus T. inclinata, and the three species T. alpicola, T. fasciculata and T. spitsbergensis. The positions of these three species groups as well as the other six T. tortuosa complex species and other included Tortella species relative to each other vary between the networks. Tortella fragilis consists of two distinct entities, called A and B in Fig. 1, 2. ITS suggests that T. alpicola and T. spitsbergensis differ most strongly from the T. tortuosa complex of species, and for T. alpicola this is indicated by plastid data as well.

Table 1.

The sequence lengths for the species included in the T. tortuosa complex (A), and for the outgroup species (B). The three specimens, which may be of hybrid origin, are not included in the table. AIn GB3-tortuosa the length is 543.

img-z3-8_01.gif

Three specimens are found in positions that are incongruent between the ITS and plastid networks (Fig. 1, 2). P152 is found close to T. inclinata in the ITS network, but within T. commutata in the plastid network. D1287 appears within T. robusta in the ITS network, but within T. tortuosa in the plastid network. D1490 belongs in T. commutata in the ITS network but appears in an isolated position between the T. commutataT. pseudofragilis and T. fragilisT. splendida branches in the plastid network, caused by the unusual situation that it has the rps4-sequence of the former and the atpB-rbcL-sequence of the latter.

In the ASAP analysis based on ITS, the result with the lowest ASAP score (4.5) recognized only T. spitsbergensis beside a single entity that in addition included all species outside the T. tortuosa complex (Appendix 3). The next two results had the same ASAP score, 7.5, and one or both results recognized the lineages we here interpret as species, including the species outside the T. tortuosa complex. In the ASAP analysis based on plastid data, the result with the lowest ASAP score (2.5) recognized more species than that with the lowest ITS ASAP score, but several species, such as one T. fragilis lineage and T. splendida, or T. fleischeri, T. robusta and T. tortuosa, could not be distinguished (Appendix 4). The result with the second lowest ASAP score (5.0), however, distinguished these. In all cases with the second lowest scores, a few specimens occurred in ambiguous positions, like in the networks.

Figure 1.

NeighborNet split network for 99 specimens of Tortella tortuosa s.l. and Tortella species (in smaller, grey fonts) that were used as outgroup, based on the nuclear ITS. Number of specimens per species are indicated within parentheses after the species names. Thick grey lines and support values indicate Jacknife support of at least 80.

img-z4-1_01.jpg

Morphological observations

The anatomy of the stem is of major importance for the taxonomy of the complex. T. tortuosa is often stated to lack a central strand but, in fact, only three of the eight species of the complex never express it. The variable T. commutata combines morphs which are able or seemingly unable to produce it. There is a correlation between the width of the central strand and the stem width; the strand vanishes when the stem width is narrower than a certain diameter, the diameter depending on the species. For example, quite narrow stems of T. bambergeri still have a strand whereas in other taxa the limit is at a diameter of about 200 µm. Normally, this is not a major identification problem since sufficiently wide stems can be found in almost all collections. Only in T. commutata, in particular in its var. valida, we sometimes found specimens that require an unusual stem diameter of 300 µm to express the central strand. A second important stem character is the thickness and colouration of the cylinder cells, of course only shown in mature parts of the stem. Usually the differentiation of hyalo- and sclerodermis is clear, only in T. bambergeri it is often indistinct.

Figure 2.

NeighborNet split network for 99 specimens of Tortella tortuosa s.l. and Tortella species (in smaller, grey fonts) that were used as outgroup, based on the plastid atpB-rbcL and rps4. Number of specimens per species are indicated within parentheses after the species names. Thick grey lines and support values indicate Jacknife support of at least 80.

img-z5-1_01.jpg

A particularity of the T. tortuosa complex is the ornamentation of the dorsal side of the costa. Here we have to differentiate between ‘spines’ and ‘papillae’. The former, which are actually ascending, prorate distal cells ends of superficial costal, are almost invisible (poorly developed) in coloured costae from sunny sites but become increasingly distinct with increasing shade. These spines are most prominent in shade morphs of T. tortuosa s. str., which led to the description of the synonymous T. spinidens, but they can be found in shade morphs of all species of the complex and also in T. inclinata, T. densa or T. fragilis. Unique to some species of the complex are conical papillae from stereid cells of the dorsal costa surface, mainly occurring in mid-leaf but also almost throughout (Fig. 4F, 7F, 10F). Their distinctness of expression has to do with how shaded the habitat is and, in particular, it correlates with long snow cover. Rather constantly we find this special sort of papillosity in T. dolomitica and T. robusta (including forked papillae), less often in T. angustifolia, rarely in T. bambergeri and in the case of T. commutata mainly in high-altititude morphs from sites with a long period of snow-cover. However, these papillae of the dorsal costa must also have a genetic basis, because they were never observed in T. fleischeri and T. tortuosa s. str. This kind of papillosity should not be confused with the papillosity of the quadrate epidermal cells over the upper part of dorsal costa that are characteristic for species like T. fasciculata and T. pseudofragilis but also seen in modifications of, for example, T. fragilis. In the T. tortuosa complex, the latter kind of papillosity is only known from T. commutata, in particular from specimens collected at sites covered by snow for long periods but which after snowmelt are dry and sunny. This kind of papillosity also depends on whether the costal stereid cells vanish towards the leaf apex. The mucro is not affected which demonstrates that the mucro is an independent feature in Tortella and not just the excurrency of the costa. Further support regarding the independent nature of the mucro comes from the fact that once we found an obvious mutant, a single cushion of T. commutata where all leaves lacked a mucro.

Descriptions of density and number of leaf cell papillae refer to the visible distal ends of the papillae. The proximal portions of the papillae are mostly confluent and therefore hardly possible to count. The distal ends may be bacillose, conic or broadly knobbly. In xeromorphic forms of T. commutata, mainly in its var. valida (partly also in T. tortuosa s. str.), the papillae are arranged in groups of 4(5) over the lumens and look almost c-shaped. In xeromorphic expressions of T. angustifolia we observed rings of thick, rounded papillae, covering the periphery of cells in the lower limb. A secure species identification solely based on papillae characters is, however, not possible.

Moist leaves are variably secund or sigmoid in top view, often strongly expressed in shade morphs of T. commutata, T. fleischeri and T. tortuosa, only weakly so in T. dolomitica and T. robusta, and hardly ever in T. splendida. It effects the corkscrew torsion of dry leaves whereas leaves that are straight as moist become ± incurved to inrolled while drying. In the first group, the leaves are also more spreading or recurved when moist.

Leaf fragility can occur in all species of the complex but least strongly so in T. splendida where it is largely restricted to the leaf apices. We can differentiate between a general lamina fragility and a tendency towards cross-breaking leaves. The former is mostly due to a thinning of the lamina in moister and shadier sites. This kind of fragility is in particular seen in T. tortuosa, T. commutata and T. fleischeri. Transversely breaking leaves are relatively rigid and are typical for xero- and cryomorphic expressions of T. angustifolia but occurs also in T. bambergeri, T. dolomitica, T. robusta and T. commutata. Leaf fragility is unlikely to be a specialisation of any particular treated species, although it is important for propagation.

Transverse undulation of the turgid lamina, mostly incorrectly stated to concern only the leaf margin, is a common feature of the T. tortuosa complex. It is mainly a response to shade but the degree of expression also correlates with costa width. However, all species can develop non-undulate sun morphs. The undulation is strongest in T. tortuosa s. str., where it is only rarely absent in xeromorphic mountain morphs. On the other hand, undulate leaves are exceptional in T. splendida, which can have to do with the fact that this species hardly ever grows in shade.

Lamina cell morphology varies in relation to site conditions. In general, plants from exposed habitats have relatively large and thick-walled lamina cells, whereas the same species develops much smaller and more thin-walled cells in shady and humid places. The papillae are usually coarser in sun than in shade specimens. However, we have to differentiate between shady and dry respectively shady and humid habitats. The papillae become very small in humid sites, hence they keep being spaced in species that have spaced papillae in sunny places. On the other hand, when growing on overhanging rocks and similar sites protected from rain, the papillae get much less reduced in size and because of the smaller cells in this habitat, these plants appear densely papillose. Such expressions have to be compared carefully with species having generally dense papillosity; it often helps to study leaves from different parts of the same collection.

The limb-sheath transition is usually described as V-shaped and abrupt for T. tortuosa s.l., and only T. arctica auct. (= T. splendida) is said to have a gradual transition. In principle, this is correct but, in reality, we find a rather wide range of expressions. Narrow-leaved plants from shady sites usually show a very narrow V and abrupt transition whereas in xeromorphic plants of the same species, the angle of the V becomes much wider and often U-shaped, and the transition becomes more gradual, in particular true for T. commutata. Extreme morphs of T. fleischeri and T. splendida sometimes even have a W-shaped transition zone. Throughout the entire T. tortuosa complex the inner sheath cells are narrower than the outer ones and the transition is usually abrupt. This is, in particular, very evident in transverse sections of the leaf bases. In T. fleischeri, this outer-inner-sheath differentiation is often so striking that this species may even be confused with T. squarrosa, which it resembles also in habit.

The setae are typically reddish in their proximal half and yellowish distally. However, this observation is based on T. commutata, T. angustifolia and T. tortuosa s. str., the most frequent and relatively often sporophyte-bearing taxa. In T. bambergeri, T. robusta and T. dolomitica, the setae are mostly more intensely red and the upper yellowish part distinctly shorter, which seemingly also has to do with shade. The capsules are variable in size and length–width ratio. Curved urns are most frequent in T. commutata but are not restricted to this species, and probably caused by drought periods during development. The number of peristome twists (one to three times) depends on the length of the operculum and seems to be of limited taxonomic significance.

Although some of the morphological characters are variable and may seem to be partly intergrading between the species, when mixed stands occur between two species, the two are always distinctly different in their character states. However, in the few cases mentioned above where specimens had molecular markers that were incongruent between the nuclear and plastid markers (Fig. 1, 2) the plants were also morphologically intermediate.

Taxonomy

Molecular and morphological information distinguish eight entities that in addition display differences in geographical distributions and habitat preferences. Since the available evidence suggests that they represent independent evolutionary lineages or in a few cases, such as T. commutata in the ITS network, coherent paraphyletic entities, we deem it most suitable to recognize them at the species level.

The taxonomic treatment is primarily based on the morphology of female plants. Male plants are less differentiated and rare in most species (or even unknown). In addition, sporophytes are quite invariable (as usual for the whole genus) and mostly found only occasionally.

The following descriptions aim at the characterisation of these taxa which means that they are only as detailed as necessary for species identification. In particular, the descriptions of the sporophytes are short. Leaf length was measured by straightening moist leaves and leaf width by flattening the leaves.

We consciously keep the nomenclature short, since further homotypic synonyms are nowadays easily found on TROPICOS ( https://tropicos.org/name/Search; accessed 24 March 2023).

General description of the Tortella tortuosa complex

Plants light-green or yellowish to dark-brown or ± ferrugineous, moderately glossy or not, small to large. Stems ± tomentose, hyalo- and sclerodermis (cortex) present (rarely indistinct), central strand present or absent. Leaves lanceolate to linear, 2.0–12.0 × 0.3–1.2 mm, length-width ratio 3–15:1, differentiated into limb and sheath, contorted or loosely to strongly curled (rarely inrolled) when dry, strongly secund (or sigmoid) to straight in top view and erecto-patent to squarrose when moist, fragile or not, keeled to canaliculate (or tubulose) in upper part. Mucro short and weak to long and strong, toothed, non-coloured, yellowish or brown. Margins flat (rarely slightly incurved), distally crenulate by projecting cell-walls, marginal cells isodiametric or wider than long, often thicker-walled and less papillose than laminal cells. Costa usually strong, about 40–200 µm wide at base, in transverse-section distally about as wide as high, proximally 2–3 times wider, guide cells in one or two layers, both stereidal layers present, adaxially covered by isodiametric, papillose epidermal cells (often only partially) or such cells missing, abaxially not covered by epidermal cells (rarely present shortly below mucro), upper dorsal costa in shade-morphs often with spiny projections of stereid cells (prorations), otherwise smooth or variably papillose (mainly in mid-leaf). Lamina not to strongly undulate, unistratose, only at junction to costa rarely bi(tri)stratose. Laminal cells in mid-limb isodiametric, about 5–15 µm wide, thin- to thick-walled, flat or bulging, weakly to strongly papillose, papillae bacillary, conical, knobbly or forked, fine or coarse, densely set or spaced, limb sharply or rather gradually differentiated from sheath, transition line V- to U- (rarely W-) shaped, often ± stepped or zigzagged, extending along margin high into limb, sheath cells smooth, outer cell rows usually distinctly wider than inner ones. Dioicous. Male plants generally distinctly smaller-leaved than female ones (partly unknown). Perichaetial leaves narrower to distally setaceous. Sporophytes frequent, rare, or unknown. Seta red or reddish in lower half (or almost throughout), yellowish above. Urn short to long cylindrical, straight to curved, usually somewhat widened at base. Operculum longly rostrate. Peristome reddish, teeth one to three times twisted from low basal membrane. Spores 8–14 µm, weakly granulose.

Tortella angustifolia (Jur.) Köckinger & Hedenäs, comb. nov., Fig. 3AD, 4

  • Basionym: Barbula tortuosa var. angustifolia Jur., Laubm.-Fl. Oesterr.-Ung.: 123. 1882. ≡ Mollia tortuosa var. angustifolia (Jur.) Braithw., Brit. Moss Fl. 1: 253, 37Cg. 1887. ≡ Tortella tortuosa var. angustifolia (Jur.) Limpr., Laubm. Deutschl.1: 606. 1888. Type: [Austria]: ‘780. Barbula tortuosa β angustifolia, Tirol: Lienz, auf Kalkblöcken am Steige in die Kerschbaumeralpe, 5/8 1875, Gander’ (lectotype, designated here: W-2014-0004973!).

  • Note

  • Juratzka's understanding of his var. angustifolia was poorly conceived and the syntypes belong to more than one species. The chosen lectotype with well-developed, sporophyte-bearing cushion-sections seems to fit the protologue best. Barbula tortuosa var. longifolia Renauld may belong to the same species. It was described from the Pyrenees in the same year but in the last issue of Revue Bryologique 9 (Renauld 1882), whereas a handwritten remark on the cover page of HK´s personal copy of Juratzka (1882) gives 1 July 1882 as the date of purchase. Hence, var. longifolia would be, if the same, a later synonym. Tortella tortuosa var. setifera Velen. may be a further synonym. Unfortunately, both types could not be located.

  • Description

  • Plants medium-sized to large, in loose to dense cushions or turfs, light green (in shade), yellowish or brown (in full sun), interior of cushions pale greyish brown. Shoots erect, up to 8 cm long, densely or loosely and evenly foliated, irregularly branched. Narrow-leaved branch innovations with restricted growth absent. Stems red-brown when mature, in transverse-section circular to triangular, up to 350 µm wide, hyalodermis distinct, cortex red-brown, of 1–3 rows of distinctly thick-walled cells, cylinder cells thin- to thick-walled and rather large, central strand absent. Leaves 3.0–12.0 × 0.3–1.0 mm, linear-lanceolate to linear, length-width ratio 8–15:1, when dry contorted around stem (xeromorphic extremes) or loosely to strongly curled, uppermost part straight for some distance, when moist erecto-patent to spreading, almost straight to moderately secund in top view, quite fragile, mainly cross-breaking. Limb gradually and very narrowly acuminate, distally canaliculate or ± keeled (in shade). Sheath longly or shortly rectangular to ovate, not or moderately widened, non-coloured to yellowish. Apex ending in a narrow and sharp, yellowish mucro, 200–400 µm long. Costa strong, in shade-morphs in upper part dorsally with spines, in mid-leaf with mixed papillae and spines, at limb-sheath transition 70–200 µm wide, gradually narrowed to apex, occupying about a quarter to a sixth of leaf width in mid-leaf, in transverse-section at leaf base ± 2–3 times wider than long, in mid-leaf semicircular to rounded triangular and about 2 times wider than long, isodiametric in apical part, adaxial epidermis mostly continuously absent (more rarely present), abaxial epidermis absent, guide cells usually in a single row. Margins flat, crenulate by papillosity. Lamina hardly to distinctly undulate (mainly in mid-leaf), unistratose, transition zone between limb and sheath V-shaped, transition rather abrupt. Marginal cells in mid-limb mostly wider than long or irregular in shape, often less papillose than laminal cells. Mid-limb cells ± isodiametric, 5–12 µm wide, thin-walled and flat (in shade) to thick-walled and bulging (in sun), with densely set, in shade fine, stellate, conic or bacillar papillae, in sun thick and flattened papillae (in lower limb often forming rings in periphery of cells), papillosity in younger leaves obscuring areolation. Inner papillose transition cells sometimes with thickened cross-walls. Sheath cells in upper part mostly shortly rectangular and thick-walled, often forming a yellowish zone. Lower, inner ones 30–120 × 5–10 µm, thin- to moderately thick-walled. Male plants smaller, occasionally observed. Sporophytes occasionally to frequently present. Seta reddish in basal half, yellowish in upper half, rather thin, 15–30 mm long, urns straight to moderately curved, 2.0–3.5 mm long.

  • Although molecularly distinct, among some of the species of the complex Tortella angustifolia appears intermediate in a few taxonomically important characters. The dorsal costa has usually both spines and papillae in shade morphs, the ventral surface is much more frequently free of isodiametric, papillose cells than in habitually similar taxa within the complex. Xeromorphic expressions often have lower limb cells with rings of thick and flattened papillae in the periphery of the cells, leaving the cell middle seemingly without papillae. On the other hand, scio- and hygromorphic plants have a dense and rather fine leaf papillosity. A good field character of T. angustifolia is the straight uppermost portions of dry leaves, oriented at right angles to the stem axis, which is most distinct in relatively xeromorphic plants. The leaves of T. angustifolia often reach 10 mm in length and occasionally even 12 mm; hence, it develops the longest leaves among the Pottiaceae. With T. tortuosa s. str. it shares the absence of the stem central strand but has densely papillose leaf cells like in the group of narrow-leaved taxa (T. bambergeri, T. dolomitica, T. robusta) which have a central strand.

  • Ecology and distribution

  • Tortella angustifolia is a competitive species, preferring moderately shaded rock habitats predominantly of northern exposure but at higher elevations it tolerates full sun. It shows a rather wide amplitude with respect to pH, occurring under subneutral to basic conditions; it can thus also grow on base-rich siliceous rocks. Besides rock, it invades, sometimes even dominantly, dolomitic gravel and sand. It is almost absent from manmade habitats, seemingly avoiding sites rich in nutrients. In shaded limestone habitats of the montane belt of the Alps it is often the only Tortella, but otherwise mixed stands with nearly every other Tortella species are occasionally found. Europe-wide, it seems to occur mainly in mountainous regions. In the Alps, it is a widespread and often frequent element from the low montane to the subnival belt, reaching about 2700 m a.s.l. In Sweden, it is much rarer and mainly confined to the southern part. We saw some material from Scotland and the Balkan Peninsula.

  • Figure 3.

    Habit photos of Tortella angustifolia (A–D), T. bambergeri (E–H), T. commutata (I–L) and T. dolomitica (M–O). A–J, L, M, O from Styria; K, N from Carinthia; L from type of var. valida.

    img-z8-1_01.jpg

    Figure 4.

    Tortella angustifolia. (A) shoot dry and moist, (B) leaves, (C) mucro, (D) leaf transverse sections, (E) limb-sheath transition zone, (F) dorsal costa surface at mid-leaf, (G) leaf margin at mid-leaf, (H) laminal cells in mid-leaf, (I) stem transverse section. A2, B (left leaf), C, H from HK 15032, A1, B (right leaf), D, E, F, G, I from HK 15035.

    img-z9-1_01.jpg

    Tortella bambergeri (Schimp.) Broth., Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 1(3): 397. 1902. Fig. 3EH, 5

    • Basionym: Trichostomum bambergeri Schimp., Synopsis Muscorum Europaeorum, Editio Secunda 173. 1876. Type: [Italy]:‘AndenMauerndesSchlossesRametzbeiMeran,1853, leg. Bamberger’ (holotype: BM-000517507-Schimper!).

    • = Tortella brotheri (Lindb. ex Broth.) Broth., Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 1(3):397. 1902. ≡ Molliabrotheri Lindb. ex Broth., Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae 19(12): 46. 1892. Type: [Georgia, Imeretia]: ‘Caucasus, Mekvena, ad fl. Rion, ad saxa calcar. umbr., 4/6 1877, leg. V. F. Brotherus’ [lectotype (Eckel 2010): H-BR4169035!].

    • Tortella tortuosa var. rotaeana (De Not.) Limpr., Die Laubmoose Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz 1: 606. 1888. ≡ Tortula tortuosa var. rotaeana De Not., Musci Italici 1: 12, 67. 34. 1862. ≡ Barbula tortuosa var. rotaeana (De Not.) Grav., Revue Bryologique 10: 23. 1883, Type: [Italy]: ‘Barbula tortuosa var. Rotaeana, ex Rota, DNtrs, Valle Brembana, (no.) 78’ (lectotype, designated here: RO (s. n.)!).

    • Notes

    • The holotype of Trichostomum bambergeri Schimp. represents a rather xeromorphic expression. The name Tortella bambergeri was severely misapplied during the last decades (Köckinger and Hedenäs 2017). Nevertheless, a proposal for rejection would have a low chance of success since unambiguous type material is present.

    • Description

    • Plants small to medium-sized, in low and loose turfs (rarely dense and sometimes high cushions), yellowish to bluish green (in shade) or at most light brown (in full sun), interior of cushions pale greyish brown. Shoots erect, up to 2(–5) cm long, densely or loosely and evenly foliated, irregularly branched. Narrow-leaved branch innovations with restricted growth absent. Stems non-coloured to brown when mature, in transverse-section circular, up to 200 (–280) µm wide, hyalodermis mostly indistinct, cortex indistinct, cylinder cells thin-walled and small, central strand always present, up to 60 (–80) µm wide, occupying a quarter to a fifth of stem diameter. Leaves 2.5–7.0 × 0.2–0.6 mm, linear-lanceolate to linear, length-width ratio 8–15:1, when dry loosely (to strongly) curled (rarely erect and twisted like a corkscrew), when moist erecto-patent to spreading, straight to moderately secund in top view, not to distinctly fragile. Limb gradually and very narrowly acuminate (sometimes parallel-margined in mid-third and narrowed in upper third), distally canaliculate or ± keeled (in deeper shade). Sheath shortly rectangular to ovate, not or (in straight-leaved plants) distinctly widened, usually non-coloured (rarely yellowish). Apex ending in a toothed, short and narrow to long and hardly toothed, yellowish mucro, 70–200 (–300) µm long. Costa strong, in shade-morphs dorsally with spines, in mid-leaf only rarely with a few papillae, at limb-sheath transition 60–130 µm wide, gradually narrowed to apex, occupying about a third to a sixth of leaf width in mid-leaf, in transverse-section at leaf base ± 1.5–2 times wider than long, in mid-leaf semicircular and about 1.5 times wider than long, isodiametric in apical part, adaxial epidermis present for much of its length to continuously absent, abaxial epidermis absent, guide cells usually in a single row. Margins flat, crenulate by projecting cells. Lamina not to weakly undulate (mainly in mid-leaf), unistratose (to bistratose at transition to costa), transition zone between limb and sheath V-shaped and abrupt to U-shaped and gradual (in xeromorphic plants). Marginal cells in mid-limb usually wider than long, often less papillose than laminal cells. Mid-limb cells ± isodiametric, 5–10 µm wide, usually thick-walled and bulging, with densely set and knobbly (in deeper shade more loosely set and sometimes c-shaped) papillae, papillosity in younger leaves obscuring areolation. Transition cells hardly ever with more thickened cross-walls. Sheath cells mostly thin-walled, shortly to longly rectangular, lower, inner ones 40–120 × 8–20 µm. Male plants smaller, occasionally observed. Sporophytes occasionally to frequently present. Seta reddish in basal half, yellowish in upper half to red almost throughout, rather thin, 10–20 mm long, urns straight to moderately curved, 2–3.5 mm long.

    • In the field, T. bambergeri is recognized by its yellowish or often somewhat bluish tinged, mostly low turfs with small and narrow leaves that are erecto-patent to patent, hardly undulate and weakly secund when moist and loosely curled when dry. Typical expressions have a canaliculate, narrow limb and small limb cells whereas in deeper shade the limb becomes keeled and the laminae distinctly wider with larger cells. Except in very narrow leaves, the mucro is usually short and fine with some distinct teeth. The sheath is mostly whitish and rather short and in straight-leaved morphs distinctly widened. Tortella bambergeri can be most easily confused with small-leaved expressions of T. robusta and is best distinguished from this by its wider stem central strand in relation to the stem diameter (key). Furthermore, T. robusta is normally a coarser plant with leaves distinctly inrolled when dry and it occurs mainly in subalpine to alpine environments whereas T. bambergeri is a more thermophilous element. We never saw the two growing together. Tortella bambergeri is well-circumscribed in southern Central Europe but plants from Britain (e.g. D1505 in our study) and Spain deviate both molecularly and morphologically. This observation is based on a limited set of specimens from outside the Alps and more material must be studied before it can be decided whether some of this variation should be excluded from the present circumscription of T. bambergeri.

    • Ecology and distribution

    • Tortella bambergeri is primarily a calciphilous pioneer on rocks of forest road cuttings, quarries or natural rock erosion sites that are often soon overgrown by more competitive bryophytes. More rarely, where successional changes are less severe, we find this moderately sciophilous plant in shallow crevices and rock niches of moderately moist rock walls in persistent stands; it is rare in xeric extremes on boulders and stones. The only associates of the complex seem to be T. commutata and T. angustifolia. Other accompanying bryophytes include Encalypta streptocarpa Hedw., Didymodon fallax (Hedw.) R.H.Zander, Rhynchostegium murale (Hedw.) Schimp., Gymnostomum aeruginosum Sm. or Fissidens dubius P.Beauv., in drier sites D. rigidulus Hedw., Hypnum cupressiforme Hedw. or even Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid., demonstrating a certain tolerance for nutrient richness. It can be regarded a moderately thermophilous species not exceeding the middle montane belt in the Alps. Phytogeographically, it seems to represent a submediterranean element, in central and western Europe being confined to the southern parts and being probably rather widespread in mountainous, calcareous areas of the Mediterranean basin, to the east reaching the Caucasus (type of T. brotheri). It is seemingly absent from northern Europe.

    Figure 5.

    Tortella bambergeri. (A) shoot dry and moist, (B) leaves, (C) mucro, (D) leaf transverse sections, (E) limb-sheath transition zone, (F) dorsal costa surface at mid-leaf, (G) leaf margin at mid-leaf, (H) laminal cells in mid-leaf, (I) stem transverse section. All illustrations from HK 15029.

    img-z11-1_01.jpg

    Tortella commutata Köckinger & Hedenäs, sp. nov., Fig. 3IL, 6

    • Diagnosis: Differing from the similar T. tortuosa s. str. in smaller leaves, a lower leaf length-width ratio of (3)4–8(9):1, an often shortly pointed leaf apex, a short and rather weak mucro, the stem transverse-section more brownish with rather thin-walled cylinder cells and the general ability to develop a central strand.

    • Type: Sweden, Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, N of Mávasjávrre, SE portion of Mt. Ákháris, 810 m a.s.l., 66.944322°N, 16.375443°E, Soil on steep rock, 9 Aug. 2015, Lars Hedenäs, Göran Odelvik & Martin Westberg (holotype: S, reg. no. B227353!, isotype in G!) (GenBank accession numbers: ITS: MK456328; atpB-rbcL: MK467383; rps4: MK466854).

    • Note

    • In central and southern Europe this plant was hitherto often named T. tortuosa var. fragilifolia based on a highly variable and unreliable combination of features, including relatively short leaves, a weakly undulate lamina and a distinct leaf fragility. Recently, var. fragilifolia was transferred as a new variety to T. nitida (Köckinger and Hedenäs 2021).

    • Description

    • Plants small to large, in loose to dense cushions (rarely turfs), light or yellowish green (in shade) or yellowish to dark brown (in sun), interior of cushions pale greyish to brown. Shoots erect, up to 5 cm long, rather loosely, more rarely densely foliated, irregularly branched. Narrow-leaved branch innovations with restricted growth absent. Stems brown when mature, in transverse-section circular, up to 350 (–400) µm wide, hyalodermis distinct, cortex often rather indistinct, cylinder cells thin-walled (rarely thick-walled) and small, central strand mostly thin but up to 40 (–50) µm wide, partly only present in stems wider than 300 µm. Leaves 2.0–6.0 × 0.4–1.0 mm, lanceolate to linear-lanceolate, length-width ratio (3)4–8(9):1, when dry ± erect and contorted around axis or incurved and contorted (rarely strongly curled), when moist patent to recurved, weakly to strongly secund in top view, not to strongly fragile. Limb gradually acuminate or parallel-margined in mid-leaf and in upper part rather suddenly shortly acuminate, keeled. Sheath quadrate to rectangular, not or weaky widened, usually non-coloured (rarely yellowish). Apex ending in a toothed, short and few-celled, rarely stronger, yellowish to brown mucro, 70–200 µm long. Costa in shade-morphs dorsally with spines, in long snow-covered sites in mid-leaf also papillose, at limb-sheath transition 50–100 µm wide, gradually narrowed to apex, occupying about an eighth to a sixth of leaf width in mid-leaf, in transverse-section at leaf base ± 1.5–2 times wider than long, in mid-leaf semi-circular and about 1.5 times wider than long, isodiametric in apical part, adaxial epidermis present at least in mid-leaf, abaxial epidermis absent (in long snow-covered sites sometimes covering a distance of up to 0.5 mm below mucro), guide cells usually in a single row. Margins flat, crenulate by projecting cells and papillae. Lamina weakly to strongly undulate, unistratose, transition zone between limb and sheath broadly V-shaped and rather abrupt to U-shaped and gradual (in xeromorphic plants). Marginal cells in mid-leaf ± quadrate. Mid-leaf cells ± quadrate, 6–14 (16) µm wide, thin- to thick-walled, with fine and simple (in shaded, moist sites) to coarse and forked or rings of 3–5 C-shaped, ± spaced papillae; papillosity in younger leaves not obscuring areolation. Juxtacostal transition cells in older leaves frequently with distinctly thickened cross-walls. Sheath cells mostly thin-walled, shortly to longly rectangular, lower, inner ones 20–120 × 8–16 µm. Male plants smaller, frequent. Sporophytes occasionally to frequently present. Seta reddish in basal half, yellowish in upper half, 10–30 mm long, urns straight to curved, 2.0–3.5 mm long.

    • The morphologically very different T. pseudofragilis (Köckinger and Hedenäs 2017) goes back to an ancient hybridisation of T. commutata and an unknown parent similar to T. fragilis, which is the reason why T. pseudofragilis appears deeply nested within T. commutata in the plastid network (Fig. 2).

    • The choice of epithet refers to the remarkable variability of T. commutata, both molecularly and morphologically. The nominate plant (var. commutata), which is the dominating morph in northern Europe, frequently bears sporophytes, has mostly a stem central strand, rather small leaves, often small laminal cells with small and often rather densely set papillae. It occurs in relatively moist and cold sites. A rarely fruiting morph, genetically distinct especially in the plastid data (including D1250, D1252, D1507, D1508; Fig. 2, Appendix 4), is rare in Scandinavia and restricted to its southern portion but putatively as frequent as the nominate morph in central Europe. We distinguish this more distinctly xerothermophilous morph as var. valida Köckinger & Hedenäs, var. nov. [Holotype: Austria, Styria, Dachstein Mts., betweeen Maralm and Neustadtalm, 1520 msm, sunny limestone boulder in pasture, 15 October 2017, H. Köckinger no. 15139, S, reg. no. B279661; Isotype GZU; differing from var. commutata by a coarser habit, pale yellowish to warm brown (sometimes orange-tinged) in sun, leaves 4.0–6.0 × 0.6–1.0 mm, laminal cells 8–16 µm wide with rather coarse papillae and the central strand mostly only expressed when stems are very thick (around 300 µm in diameter)]. Due to its larger dimensions, a diploid plant could be at hand. Many collections cannot be securely placed in either taxon due to considerable environmentally induced overlap between the varieties. For the time being, we therefore consider var. valida a semi-cryptic taxon. Single isolated sequences of the dataset (P100, P150) suggest that further genetic lineages, expected mainly in southern and western Europe, may exist.

    • Ecology and distribution

    • The wide genetic and morphological variability in T. commutata is reflected in its wide ecological amplitude. On sunny and dry calcareous rocky slopes, it is by far the most frequent species of the complex, at least in central Europe, where it invades rock, stones or gravelly soil and tolerates base-rich schists. In shaded and humid sites, it behaves like a pioneer, and is often rather soon overgrown by more competitive species. Moreover, it occurs on artificial walls, roofs, and other manmade habitats. The main associates of the complex are T. tortuosa and T. angustifolia, but it is sometimes found with almost every other member of the complex. The species is widespread all over Europe and is probably the dominant element of the complex in southern Europe. On southern slopes in the Alps, it reaches the alpine belt (up to 2650 m a.s.l.), and in northern Europe the northern Scandes.

    Figure 6.

    Tortella commutata. (A) shoot dry and moist, (B) leaves, (C) mucro, (D) leaf transverse sections, (E) limb-sheath transition zone, (F) dorsal costa surface at mid-leaf, (G) leaf margin at mid-leaf, (H) laminal cells in mid-leaf, (I) stem transverse section. All illustrations from the holotype (B 227353).

    img-z13-1_01.jpg

    Tortella dolomitica Köckinger & Hedenäs, sp. nov., Fig. 3MO, 7

    • Diagnosis. Differing from T. tortuosa s. str. in its light glaucous colouration, erecto-patent leaves, a lunate to horseshoe-shaped leaf transverse-section in mid-limb with the dorsal costa surface grading into the lamina and the ventral having a concave surface, a hardly undulate lamina, a strong papillosity of dorsal costal surface with mainly forked papillae, a strong stem central strand and thin-walled cylinder cells and its restriction to dolomitic pioneer habitats.

    • Type: Austria, Carinthia, Gailtaler Alpen, Weissensee, near Dolomitenblick, ca 950 msm; moist dolomitic gravel, 12 Aug. 2008, leg. H. Köckinger no. 14934, (holotype: S, reg. no. B196699!, isotype in GZU!).

    • Description

    • Plants medium-sized to large, in loose to dense turfs (rarely cushions), light greyish glaucous (in shade), rarely yellowish to light brown (in sun), interior of cushions pale greyish. Shoots up to 2(3) cm long, rather loosely foliated, irregularly branched. Narrow-leaved branch innovations with restricted growth absent. Stems non-coloured to brown when mature, in transverse-section circular, up to 350 µm wide, hyalodermis distinct, cortex distinct, cylinder cells thin-walled, central strand always present, up to 70 µm wide (sometimes rather wide-celled), usually occupying less than a fifth of stem diameter. Leaves 5.0–10.0 × 0.5–0.8 mm, linear-lanceolate to linear, length-width ratio 10–15:1, when dry incurved and loosely to strongly curled, when moist erect to erecto-patent, straight to moderately secund (or sigmoid) in top view, not to distinctly fragile (cross-breaking). Limb gradually and narrowly acuminate, in mid-limb canaliculate to almost tubulose. Sheath shortly rectangular to ovate, mostly distinctly widened, usually non-coloured. Apex ending in a weakly toothed, non-coloured to yellowish mucro, 100–200 µm long. Costa strong, in shade-morphs dorsally with spines, in mid-leaf mostly strongly papillose with at least partly forked papillae, at limb-sheath transition 100–180 µm wide, gradually narrowed to apex, occupying about a third to a fifth of leaf width in mid-leaf, in transverse-section at leaf base ± 3 times wider than long, in mid-leaf usually with a concave adaxial side and abaxial side grading into lamina (leaf section lunate to horseshoe-shaped), adaxial epidermis present for much of its length to continuously absent, abaxial epidermis absent, guide cells usually in a single row (sometimes a second row indicated). Margins flat, crenulate by projecting cells. Lamina not to weakly undulate (mainly in mid-leaf), unistratose (to bistratose at transition to costa), transition zone between limb and sheath V-shaped and abrupt to U-shaped and gradual (in xeromorphic plants). Marginal cells in mid-limb usually wider than long, if not elongate marginal cells of sheath reaching very high into limb. Mid-limb cells ± isodiametric, (6)8–10(12) µm wide, thin- or thick-walled but hardly bulging, with densely set and knobbly thick papillae; papillosity in younger leaves obscuring areolation. Transition cells never with more thickened cross-walls. Sheath cells mostly thin-walled, mostly rather shortly rectangular, lower, inner ones 40–100 × 10–20 µm. Male plants smaller, rarely observed. Sporophytes occasionally to frequently present. Seta reddish in basal half, yellowish in upper half to red almost throughout, rather thin, 20–30 mm long, urns usually straight, 2.5–3 mm long.

    • This newly described species is molecularly quite distinct; according to ITS, it is most closely related to the T. fragilisT. splendida-clade whereas plastid data suggest affinities to both T. tortuosa and T. densa. Morphologically, T. dolomitica is most similar to T. robusta and is best distinguished from the latter by its distinctly lunate transverse sections in mid-leaf. In the field, T. dolomitica is mostly light glaucous (soon bleached in the herbarium). Tortella robusta, on the other hand, appears mostly greyish to yellowish. In addition, these species differ markedly in ecology and we did not observe mixed stands.

    • Ecology and distribution

    • Tortella dolomitica occurs mainly as a pioneer species on moist, stabilized dolomitic gravel or sand, usually in moderate shade, where it grows both in natural habitats and at roadsides. Sometimes, it occurs also on moist dolomite rock. The most frequent associate is Encalypta streptocarpa. This species has hitherto been found only from the middle-montane to the subalpine belt of the Austrian Eastern Alps where its occurrences are scattered, and it is usually found in low quantity. It is part of the dolomite flora of this area, containing bryophyte species like Hydrogonium croceum (Brid.) Jan Kučera, Grimmia teretinervis Limpr., Brachythecium funkii Schimp., Hymenostylium xerophilum Köckinger & Jan Kučera, Seligeria irrigata (H.K.G.Paul) Ochyra & Gos, Radula visianica C.Massal. or the more widespread Tortella densa.

    Tortella fleischeri (E.Bauer) J.J.Amann, Flore des Mousses 3: 30. 1933. Fig. 8AC, 9

  • Basionym: Trichostomum fleischeri E. Bauer, Musci Europaei Exsiccati 15: n. 741. 1910. ≡ Tortella tortuosa var. fleischeri (E.Bauer) Latzel, Hedwigia 66: 138. 1926. Type: [Austria]: „741. Trichostomum fleischeri Bauer n. sp. ster., Steiermark: Alt-Aussee, am Moosberge auf feuchten Alpenwiesen feste, teppichartige Polster bildend, 900 m s. m, 19 Sept. 1908 legit M. Fleischer, E. Bauer, Musci exsiccati' (lectotype, designated here: GZU!, isolectotypes in S, reg. no. B218490! and B218491!).

  • Tortella kmetiana Pilous, Rozpravy Čzechoslovenské Academie Vĕd a Umeĕní 71(2): 22. 1. 1961.

  • Note

  • Tortella kmetiana was described by Pilous (1961) from ‘terra graminosa calcarea pr. Bešeňová, ca. 530 m’ in northern Slovakia. From PR we received only a specimen that was collected by the author in ‘7. 1960’, whereas the original description gives ‘17. 7. 1958’. It may be the holotype, if a simple date confusion occurred, or a topotype, if Pilous really revisited the site two years later. Nevertheless, when compared with the protologue and Pilous’ drawings, this material certainly represents the same species. According to a revision label, it was studied by R. Düll in 1994, suggesting that it is the only extant specimen.

  • Description

  • Plants small to large, in dense but when removed easily disintegrating, often wide turfs or cushions, light green, yellowish or ferrugineous, interior mostly rusty brown to almost blackish. Shoots erect, up to 7 cm long, densely foliated, often with many narrow-leaved branch innovations with restricted growth (but mostly absent in small-leaved plants). Stems redbrown when mature, in transverse-section circular to triangular, up to 350 µm wide, hyalodermis and cortex distinct, cylinder cells redbrown to red (rarely yellowish-brown) and usually thick-walled, central strand mostly strong, up to 60 µm wide. Leaves 2.0–6.0 × 0.5–1.0 mm, lanceolate to linear-lanceolate, length-width ratio 4–7:1, when dry ± erect and contorted around axis or incurved and contorted (rarely strongly curled), when moist patent to recurved, not to strongly secund (or sigmoid) in top view, not to moderately fragile. Limb narrowly triangular, gradually acuminate, keeled. Sheath ± quadrate, mostly distinctly widened, non-coloured to yellowish. Apex ending in an often strongly toothed, sharp, yellowish to brown mucro, 70–200 µm long. Costa in shade-morphs dorsally with strong spines, papillae absent, at limb-sheath transition 60–140 µm wide, gradually narrowed to apex, occupying about an eighth to a sixth of leaf width in mid-leaf, in transverse-section at leaf base ± 1.5–2 times wider than long, in mid-leaf semi-circular and about 1.5 times wider than long, isodiametric in apical part, adaxial epidermis nearly always absent along a narrow mid-line (very rarely present), abaxial epidermis absent, guide cells usually in a single row. Margins flat, often crenulate by bulging cells. Lamina not to strongly undulate, unistratose, transition zone between limb and sheath broadly V-shaped and rather abrupt to U-shaped or W-shaped and gradual. Marginal cells in mid-leaf mostly isodiametric, often less papillose. Mid-leaf cells ± quadrate, 8–12 µm wide, mostly thick-walled, with 2–5, fine and simple (in shaded, moist sites) to coarse and forked papillae; papillosity in younger leaves not obscuring areolation. Juxtacostal transition cells in older leaves frequently with distinctly thickened cross-walls. Sheath cells with a marked discontinuity between inner and outer cells, thin- to thick-walled, shortly to longly rectangular, lower, inner ones 20–100 × 8–12 µm. Male plants unknown. Sporophytes very rare (probably only hybridogenous with largely aborted spores).

  • The Alpine T. fleischeri resembles T. squarrosa in habit and leaf shape and has even a marked discontinuity between the outer and inner sheath cells, although the latter are only narrower and not deviating in colour or length. The similarity is mainly due to their occurrence in similar vegetation types, T. squarrosa in xerothermic grassland and T. fleischeri in grassland above the treeline. The densely set and partly patent older leaves of T. fleischeri and the usually many branch innovations form a thick mantle around the stems, which makes this species a successful competitor against vascular plants, and this is also the reason why collections commonly disintegrate. In both plastid and nuclear markers, T. fleischeri appears closely related to T. tortuosa s. str. with which it shares the ferruginous colouration, keeled leaves, the thickened cross-walls in the leaf transition cells and the absence of papillae from the dorsal costa surface. However, T. fleischeri is easily distinguished from T. tortuosa by its constantly present central strand in the stem. Tortella fleischeri is most easily confused with the seemingly only remotely related T. commutata. From the latter, it differs in, e. g., its ferruginous (versus brown) secondary colouration, an evenly grading, triangular limb and a distinctly widened sheath which is hardly longer than wide, the mid-line of adaxial costal surface almost always with exposed stereids throughout and a usually thicker stem central strand surrounded by thick-walled and often red cylinder cells. Sporophytes were found only a few times in T. fleischeri. When spores were present, they appeared aborted. Hence, these sporophytes are likely of hybrid origin and male plants, which were never observed, may not exist.

  • Ecology and distribution

  • Tortella fleischeri is a strict calcicole which was originally described from wet meadows where it was found in large carpet-like stands. The synonymous T. kmetiana also originates from a calcareous meadow (over travertine). It is a competitive moss of alpine grassland and cushion-plant communities. Most frequently, however, the species occurs on ± humid and mostly N-facing calcareous rocks, where its stands are often more cushion-like. The most important associate of the complex is T. robusta, followed by T. angustifolia. In exposed sites, it sometimes grows together with T. commutata and T. splendida. Its third habitat type is gravel fields in the mountains or along natural rivers, where it, often only ephemeral, reaches rather low elevations (about 500 m a.s.l. or less). Low elevation occurrences are also known from dolomitic gorges. Nevertheless, this cryophilous moss prefers sites at or above the treeline. In the upper alpine and subnival belt of the calcareous mountain ranges, it proved to be the most common Tortella species. The hitherto highest known locality in the eastern Alps is at 2790 m a.s.l. (Schlüsslmayr 2019; as T. tortuosa var. fleischeri). Despite its frequency in the Alps, we have otherwise only seen collections from Slovakia (type of T. kmetiana), Montenegro (Durmitor Mts of the Dinarides) and, surprisingly, also Scotland. It is absent from northern Europe and the Arctic where it is ecologically replaced by the habitually similar T. × cuspidatissima and T. spitsbergensis.

  • Figure 7.

    Tortella dolomitica. (A) shoot dry and moist, (B) leaves, (C) mucro, (D) leaf transverse sections, (E) limb-sheath transition zone, (F) dorsal costa surface at mid-leaf, (G) leaf margin at mid-leaf, (H) laminal cells in mid-leaf, (I) stem transverse section. All illustrations from the holotype (HK 14934, B 196699)

    img-z15-1_01.jpg

    Figure 8.

    Habit photos of Tortella fleischeri (A–C), T. robusta (D–F), T. splendida (G–J) and T. tortuosa (K–N). A–D, F–M from Styria; E, N from Salzburg.

    img-z16-1_01.jpg

    Figure 9.

    Tortella fleischeri. (A) shoot dry and moist, (B) leaves, (C) mucro, (D) leaf transverse sections, (E) limb-sheath transition zone, (F) dorsal costa surface at mid-leaf, (G) leaf margin at mid-leaf, (H) laminal cells in mid-leaf, (I) stem transverse section. All illustrations from HK 15027.

    img-z17-1_01.jpg

    Tortella robusta (Pfeff.) Köckinger & Hedenäs, comb. nov., Fig. 8DF, 10

  • Basionym: Barbula tortuosa var. robusta Pfeff., Neue Denkschriften der Allgemeinen Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften 24(5): 37. 1869. Type: [Switzerland]: ‘Barbula tortuosa robusta Pfeffer, Sayiserköpfe 2000 m, 21/5 68, Pfeffer’, (lectotype, designated here: CHUR s.n.!, isolectotype in S, reg. no. B220011!). The type material represents a coarse shade morph, grown between limestone boulders.

  • Description

  • Plants medium-sized to large, in moderately dense turfs or cushions, pale greyish green to pale yellowish, at most light brown (in full sun), interior pale greyish brown. Shoots erect, up to 5 cm long, densely or loosely and evenly foliated, irregularly branched. Narrow-leaved branch innovations with restricted growth absent. Stems brown when mature, in transverse-section circular, up to 350 µm wide, hyalodermis and cortex distinct, cylinder cells yellow-brown, redbrown or brown, thick- or thin-walled, central strand mostly thin but up to 50 (–70) µm wide, usually occupying less than a fifth of stem diameter. Leaves 3.0–10.0 × 0.3–1.0 mm, linear-lanceolate to linear, length-width ratio 7–12:1, when dry incurved and inrolled or upper part contorted, when moist patent (rarely spreading to recurved), straight to moderately secund (or sigmoid) in top view, moderately to distinctly fragile, cross-breaking. Limb gradually and very narrowly acuminate (sometimes parallel-margined in mid-third and acuminate only in upper third), distally canaliculate or ± keeled (in deeper shade). Sheath rectangular to ovate, not or distinctly widened, mostly yellowish (more rarely non-coloured). Apex ending in a toothed, short and narrow to long and hardly toothed, yellowish to brown mucro, 70–200 µm long. Costa strong, in upper part with indistinct spines, in mid-leaf on dorsal surface usually papillose with mostly densely set, simple or rarely forked papillae, at limb-sheath transition 70–200 µm wide, gradually narrowed to apex, occupying about a third to a fifth of leaf width in mid-leaf, in transverse-section at leaf base ± 2 times wider than long, in mid-leaf semi-circular and about 1.5 times wider than long, isodiametric in apical part, adaxial epidermis present for much of its length (rarely absent), abaxial epidermis absent, guide cells usually in a single row. Margins flat or somewhat incurved, crenulate by projecting cells. Lamina not to weakly undulate (mainly in mid-leaf), unistratose (to bistratose at transition to costa), transition zone between limb and sheath usually narrowly V-shaped and abrupt. Marginal cells in mid-limb usually wider than long (if marginal row of elongated sheath cells not extenting so far), often less papillose than laminal cells. Mid-limb cells ± isodiametric, 6–10 µm wide, usually thick-walled and often bulging, with densely set and regular to irregular knobbly (in deeper shade sometimes c-shaped or forked) papillae, papillosity in younger leaves obscuring areolation. Transition cells occasionally with more thickened cross-walls. Sheath cells thick- to thin-walled, shortly to longly rectangular, lower, inner ones 40–140 × 8–16 µm. Male plants smaller, rare. Sporophytes rarely present. Seta red in basal two thirds, yellowish in upper third, rather thin, 20–30 mm long, urns straight, 2–3 mm long.

  • According to the plastid markers, T. robusta is closely related to T. tortuosa s. str., whereas the affinities according to ITS are more obscure. Morphologically, it combines characters found in T. dolomitica on the one hand and T. tortuosa on the other. Characteristic features are the narrow and nearly straight, patent leaves when moist, the canaliculate (in deeper shade more keeled) limb, the dense papillosity of the leaf lamina, the usually papillose dorsal costa surface, and the presence of a stem central strand. The development of the latter is highly variable, commonly absent in stem cross-sections narrower than 200 µm, thin in stems less than 300 µm but up to 50 or even 70 µm wide in stems reaching 350 µm. By far the best field characters are the light greyish green to pale yellowish colouration and the distinctly incurved-inrolled leaves of dry plants in top view. The epithet (based on type material) suggests a coarse plant, but the size is actually highly variable.

  • Ecology and distribution

  • Tortella robusta is often the only species of the complex in calcareous late snow areas. Expressions in this habitat are, however, often quite small-leaved. More vigorous cushions with larger leaves occur on N-facing, shaded and humid rocks and in adjacent moist meadows. Occurrences in S-exposure are rare. It is a rather strict calcicole, only rarely tolerating base-rich siliceous rock. When sufficiently moist, it invades also calcareous gravel and sand. The most frequent associate of the complex is T. fleischeri, more rarely it grows together with T. angustifolia and T. commutata. Although mainly a high-elevation species, ascending to about 2500 m a.s.l., it occasionally pops up in low quantity (and probably ephemeral) at lower altitudes, particularly in road-cuttings. The species has a characteristic Arctic-alpine distribution area. It is widespread in the Alps and, additionally, we have seen some material from Montenegro and Scotland. We expect that it occurs also in other high mountain ranges like the Carpathians and the Pyrenees. In northern Europe, it mainly occurs in the Scandes, rarely in northeastern Finland.

  • Figure 10.

    Tortella robusta. (A) shoot dry and moist, (B) leaves, (C) mucro, (D) leaf transverse sections, (E) limb-sheath transition zone, (F) dorsal costa surface at mid-leaf, (G) leaf margin at mid-leaf, (H) laminal cells in mid-leaf, (I) stem transverse section. All illustrations from HK 15031.

    img-z19-1_01.jpg

    Tortella splendida Köckinger & Hedenäs, sp. nov., Fig. 8GJ, 11

  • Diagnosis: Differing from T. tortuosa s. str. in a rudimentary tomentum, usually straight leaves when moist (in top view), an ovate leaf base, a canaliculate to tubulose limb, costal transverse sections usually with two rows of guide cells and being biconvex in lower leaf, a non-undulate lamina, densely papillose laminal cells, a mostly rather gradual limb-sheath-transition and yellowish sheath cells.

  • Type: Austria, Steiermark, Hochschwab Mts., Trenchtling, S of Hochturm, 1950 msm; S-facing dolomite outcrops in Carex firma-meadow, 26 Oct. 2013, leg. H. Köckinger no. 15036 (holotype: S, reg. no. B248499!, isotype in GZU!).

  • Note

  • The holotype of Mollia tortuosa var. arctica Arnell at UPS (!) (‘In valle flum. Lena, Kumachsur, 70° 30´ lat. Bor. Ad rivulum in monte calcaria, 31 July 1898, H. Nilsson-Ehle’), as well as the isotype at S, have a distinct stem central strand and a leaf morphology identical to the plants which were treated as Tortella ×cuspidatissima in Werner et al. (2014). A further isotype at LE seems to be similar since it was reported as Trichostomum cuspidatissimum Cardot & Thér. by Savicz-Ljubitzkaja (1961). This report was doubted by Crundwell and Nyholm (1963), but it confirms that obviously all type-material belongs to the same plant, except for the intermixed Didymodon giganteus (Funck) Jur. We could not find a hint of the presence of a second Tortella element. Possibly, the two authors were so convinced that nothing closely related to T. tortuosa can have a stem central strand that they even did not check the type material for this character or, alternatively, a too thin stem was cut. The holotype is not available for loan and was therefore not checked by Eckel (1998) or Werner et al. (2014). As a consequence, the plant called Tortella arctica or T. tortuosa var. arctica by Crundwell and Nyholm (1963) and more recent treatments does not have a name. For the time being, the closely related T. splendida, here described from plants of the Alps, includes also the non-European Arctic plants of T. arctica auct., but the relationship of these two elements requires more careful study.

  • Description

  • Plants medium-sized to large, in dense turfs or cushions, light green to yellowish-brown, chestnut-brown or ferrugineous to rusty brown, interior pale greyish brown to dark and sometimes rusty brown. Shoots erect, up to 6 cm long, densely and evenly foliated, irregularly branched. Narrow-leaved branch innovations with restricted growth often present. Stems redbrown when mature, in transverse-section circular, up to 350 µm wide, hyalodermis distinct, cortex distinct and up to 5 rows wide, cylinder cells yellow-brown to redbrown, thin- to thick-walled, central strand absent. Leaves 3.0–7.0 × 0.6–1.2 mm, lanceolate to linear-lanceolate, length-width ratio 5–7:1, when dry patent in mid-leaf and erect to incurved and ± contorted in upper part, when moist patent to spreading, straight to weakly secund (or flexuose) in top view, non-fragile or only apices breaking off. Limb gradually and narrowly acuminate, distally canaliculate to tubulose (rarely ± keeled in shade). Sheath shortly ovate, distinctly widened, mostly yellowish (more rarely non-coloured). Apex ending in a weakly toothed, sharp, yellowish to brown mucro, 100–300 µm long. Costa moderately strong, glossy, dorsally usually smooth (rarely with indistinct spines), non-papillose, at limb-sheath transition 60–150 µm wide, gradually narrowed to apex, occupying about a quarter to a sixth of leaf width in mid-leaf, in transverse-section at leaf base ± 2–3 times wider than long, in mid-leaf about 1.5–2 times wider than long, isodiametric in apical part, in lower half biconvex (rarely semi-circular); adaxial epidermis present for much of its length, except for apical part, abaxial epidermis absent, guide cells usually in two layers (rarely a single one) or rows (in section). Margins flat, crenulate by projecting cells to smooth. Lamina not undulate (rarely weakly in mid-leaf), unistratose (very rarely bistratose spots in upper part), transition zone between limb and sheath V-shaped (often stepped) and rather abrupt to more frequently U-(sometimes W-)shaped and very gradual. Marginal cells in mid-limb isodiametric to elongate, weakly papillose or smooth. Mid-limb cells ± isodiametric, 5–10 µm wide, mostly thick-walled but hardly bulging, with densely set and regular to irregular knobbly (in shade rarely almost c-shaped) papillae. Transition cells never with more thickened cross-walls. Sheath cells thick- to thin-walled, shortly to longly rectangular, lower, inner ones 20–100 × 8–20 µm. Male plants not known. Sporophytes not known.

  • Both nuclear and plastid DNA data show a close relationship of T. splendida (including T. arctica auct.) to T. fragilis. They share the absence of a stem central strand, non-secund and non-undulate leaves, a canaliculate to tubulose limb, a similar areolation, dense cell papillosity and an at least occasional presence of small bistratose spots in uppermost lamina in T. splendida (and T. arctica auct.) compared with the more constantly bistratose upper lamina in T. fragilis. However, because of the highly modified propaguloid leaf apices in the latter the differentiation is normally easy. In rare shade-morphs of T. fragilis they may be nearly absent, but such plants have a different leaf shape (Eckel 1998).

  • In exposed habitats, this species is always coarser and prettier than associated species of the complex, which induced us to call it T. splendida. When well developed, large morphs are characterised by densely set and non-fragile, almost tubulose leaves, usual absence of a tomentum, a biconvex costa with two layers (two rows in transverse section) of guide cells in the lower leaf and finely papillose, small lamina cells. At the harshest sites, the costae become ± flat adaxially and the guide cells may lose their second layer, the laminal cells become larger, more thick- and brown-walled, and the papillae coarser and the limb-sheath transition more gradual and more U-shaped. In addition, the sheath cells tend to be shorter, more thick-walled, and more strongly yellowish. Such plants are morphologically very close to Arctic collections.

  • Eckel (1998) treated T. arctica auct. at varietal rank within her wide concept of T. tortuosa because of difficulties in distinguishing collections from American non-Arctic occurrences. It is true that Alpine plants from somewhat protected sites or from shaded cushion margins may also have a few leaves that are slightly secund and have a few undulations, but all other characters remain stable. Eckel´s concept allows the occasional presence of a thin central strand in the stem, seemingly including, beside T. arctica auct., also the hybridogeneous T. ×cuspidatissima, respectively T. arctica sensu type.

  • The recently described, thermophilous T. mediterranea (Köckinger et al. 2018) is strikingly similar in habit and in part of the microscopic features but differs in a rather dull colouration, a pronounced leaf fragility, wider cells of the inner mid-sheath (despite a narrower base), an always single layer of costal guide cells and usually more numerous ventral than dorsal stereid layers.

  • Ecology and distribution

  • Tortella splendida is a distinctly cryophilous species, in the Alps only found above the treeline. However, it avoids habitats with a long-lasting snow cover. It therefore occurs on steep, S-facing rocky slopes and only rarely in N-exposure and then where strong winds prevent a thick snow layer. At its lower sites it invades rock (in particular dolomite, rarely limestone and base-rich siliceous rock), whereas at the upper limit it develops turfs in meadows, usually belonging to the plant community Caricetum firmae. Mixed stands are known with T. fleischeri, T. commutata, and, at dolomitic sites, T. densa. The species is scattered to rather widespread, but normally in low quantity, in the mountain ranges of the eastern Alps of Austria between 1700 and 2500 m a.s.l. We also saw two collections from Switzerland whereas it is obviously absent from northern Europe. The included T. arctica auct. is known from Arctic and northern Central Asia, Arctic North America, and the Rocky Mountains.

  • Figure 11.

    Tortella splendida. (A) shoot dry and moist, (B) leaves, (C) mucro, (D) leaf transverse sections, (E) limb-sheath transition zone, (F) dorsal costa surface at mid-leaf, (G) leaf margin at mid-leaf, (H) laminal cells in mid-leaf, (I) stem transverse section. All illustrations from the holotype (HK 15036, B 248499).

    img-z21-1_01.jpg

    Tortella tortuosa (Hedw.) Limpr., Die Laubmoose Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz 1: 604. 1888. Fig. 8KN, 12

  • Basionym: Tortula tortuosa Hedw., Species Muscorum Frondosorum 124: 1801. Type: ‘Hedwig s. n.’, top row of specimens on sheet [lectotype (Ellis and Price 2013): G, reg. no. G00040331!].

  • Tortella spinidens (G.Roth ex Zodda) Levier & G.Roth, Hedwigia 49: 219. 7 f. 3. 1910. ≡ Tortella tortuosa var. spinidens G.Roth ex Zodda, Malpighia 21: 488. 1907. Type: [Italy]: ‘Tortella spinidens Lev. & Roth., n. sp. (earlier naming T. fragilis var. dentata crossed out), Campello-Monti (prov. Novar. Pedemontii), in ascensu ad alpem Foscalina, juxta semitam, 1400 m, 27. Jul. 1904, leg. E. L., E. Levier - Bryotheca Italica, no. 163’ (lectotype, designated here: herb. G. Roth in S, reg. no. B233655!).

  • Tortella undulatifolia Dixon, 150th Anniversary Volume, Royal Botanic Garden Calcutta 180. 1942. Type: ‘India. Kashmir, Lidar and Sind Valleys, 2200-4200m’, Garrett & Lillie 2453 (holotype: BM-001006420-Dixon!).

  • Notes

    • 1) The lectotype of Tortula tortuosa Hedw. was re-studied by us in the light of the segregation. We confirm that it consists of only one species.

    • 2) Tortella tortuosa var. spinidens was first published by Zodda (1907) but the valid description was made by G. Roth (in litt. to Levier) and is based on Levier´s collection from Novara, Piedmont (Roth 1910: 'Originalexemplaren'). Therefore Pampanini´s collection from ‘Forcella grande, 2250 m’ (Zodda 1907) in the southern Dolomites is not even a syntype.

    • 3) Many leaves of the holotype of Tortella undulatifolia Dixon from the Indian Himalaya have a rather sudden narrowing from a parallel-sided middle portion to a cuspidate apex but from a distinctly lower leaf position than in T. commutata. Such leaves sometimes occur also in xeromorphic T. tortuosa from high elevations in the Alps. In all other characters it fits this species.

  • Description

  • Plants medium-sized to large, in rather loose cushions or turfs, green to ferrugineous, interior of cushions pale greyish to dark brown, rarely blackish. Shoots erect, up to 5 cm long, rather loosely foliated, irregularly branched. Narrow-leaved branch innovations with restricted growth absent. Stems redbrown when mature, in transverse-section circular to triangular, up to 350 µm wide, hyalodermis and cortex distinct, cylinder cells redbrown to red and ± thick-walled, central strand absent. Leaves 4.0–10.0 × 0.3–0.7 mm, linear-lanceolate to linear, length-width ratio 8–15:1, when dry in basal half erect to patent and distally incurved and strongly contorted around axis (like a corkscrew) or generally strongly curled, when moist patent to recurved, weakly to strongly secund or sigmoid in top view, not to strongly fragile. Limb gradually acuminate or parallel-margined in mid-leaf and only in upper third acuminate, keeled. Sheath shorly to longly rectangular, not or weakly widened, usually non-coloured (rarely yellowish). Apex ending in a toothed, sharp, yellowish mucro, 100–300 µm long. Costa in shade-morphs dorsally with distinct spines, in sun smooth, never papillose, at limb-sheath transition 50–150 µm wide, gradually narrowed to apex, occupying about an eighth to a fifth of leaf width in mid-leaf, in transverse-section at leaf base ± 1.5–2 times wider than long, in mid-leaf semi-circular and about 1.5 times wider than long, isodiametric in apical part, adaxial epidermis present at least in mid-leaf, abaxial epidermis absent, guide cells usually in a single row (sometimes a single cell indicating a second row). Margins flat, crenulate by projecting cells and papillae. Lamina weakly to strongly undulate, unistratose, transition zone between limb and sheath narrowly to broadly V-shaped and rather abrupt, rarely U-shaped and more gradual (in xeromorphic plants). Marginal cells in mid-leaf ± isodiametric. Mid-leaf cells ± quadrate, 8–14 µm wide, thin- to thick-walled, with spaced, fine and bacillariform (in shaded, moist sites) to coarse and forked (rarely ± c-shaped) papillae (in sun), usually rather evenly distributed over lamina; papillosity in younger leaves not obscuring areolation. Juxtacostal transition cells frequently with distinctly thickened cross-walls, often reaching far into limb (best seen in older leaves). Sheath cells mostly thin-walled, shortly to longly rectangular, lower, inner ones 40–120 × 8–16 µm. Male plants smaller, occasionally seen. Sporophytes occasionally present. Seta reddish in basal half, yellowish in upper half, 20–30 mm long, urns straight to weakly curved, 3–4 mm long.

  • In lowland areas of Europe, T. commutata and T. tortuosa s. str. are often the only representatives of the complex that share the keeled limb, an often strong leaf undulation, a narrow costa in comparison with the leaf width, and often markedly thickened cross-walls in the limb-sheath transition zone, best seen in older leaves. In the field, they can be distinguished by their differing length-width ratios of the leaves (about 4–8:1 versus 8–15:1) and the less strongly versus more strongly curled leaves in the dry state. In the sun, T. commutata has a brown colouration whereas T. tortuosa is usually ferruginous. Microscopically, the former has the general ability to develop a stem central strand whereas the latter does not have it. There are, however, problematic large-celled forms of T. commutata (in particular its semi-cryptic var. valida) which express a central strand only when stems are very thick (300 µm and more in diameter). Such plants usually have groups of ± c-shaped laminal papillae over the laminal cells; such papillae only rarely occur in T. tortuosa, where they are mostly bacillariform, knobbly or forked and rather regularly distributed over the lamina. When fruiting, sporophytes are somewhat larger in T. tortuosa.

  • Ecology and distribution

  • Tortula tortuosa in the strict sense is the least calciphilous species of the complex. The pH-values of its substrates range from approximately 5.5 to 7.0, thus from moderately acid to neutral. In fact, it prefers base-rich siliceous rock where it grows in crevices, niches and on exposed surfaces, both in full sun and shade. When it occurs on calcareous rock, it prefers boulders, stones and similar rock habitats exposed to rain, but avoids strongly basic conditions, in particular moist rock niches and crevices. It can also grow on artificial walls, often made of concrete, and on roofs. In calcareous areas it may be found as an epiphyte, sometimes on stony soil, base-rich humus and above the treeline as a frequent part of alpine to subnival cushion plant stands or grassland over base-rich (sometimes base-poor) siliceous rock. It occurs up to almost 3000 m a.s.l. Mixed stands are often met with T. commutata, T. angustifolia, and T. fragilis but only rarely with other Tortella-species. It is the most frequent species of the complex in Northern, Western, and the lowlands and lower mountain ranges of central Europe, whereas in many limestone areas of the Alps and southern Europe it is not the dominant member of the T. tortuosa complex.

  • Figure 12.

    Tortella tortuosa. (A) shoot dry and moist, (B) leaves, (C) mucro, (D) leaf transverse sections, (E) limb-sheath transition zone, (F) dorsal costa surface at mid-leaf, (G) leaf margin at mid-leaf, (H) laminal cells in mid-leaf, (I) stem transverse section. All illustrations from HK 15033.

    img-z23-1_01.jpg

    Key to the species of the Tortella tortuosa complex

    Some explanations and advice

    Before identifications, check the material for heterogenity. Mixed stands of more than one species are relatively frequent, at least in areas with a rich limestone flora. Male plants of a species are distinctly smaller than female plants and may sometimes suggest a mixed stand; perigonia are situated in the axils of stem furcations.

    It is crucial to study stem transverse-sections with a diameter of more than 200 µm to evaluate the presence or absence of a central strand. Well-developed shoots have stem diameters between about 200 and 350 µm. Even species with the ability to develop a central strand do not produce one when the diameter is too small. Stem sections should not be made from too young shoot segments but from segments with well-developed leaves and never from segments with reduced leaves. We recommend using entire shoots for sectioning, to break them into two or three parts that are placed in parallel and then cut together. When the material is variable, more than one shoot should be investigated. Generally, it is not necessary to produce very thin sections.

    Study both young (for papillosity) and old leaves, and do not confuse perichaetial leaves with normal leaves! Leaf length should be measured by straightening moist leaves and leaf width by flattening the leaves. The lower limit of leaf lengths refers to well-developed leaves of small-leaved plants and not to abnormal, depauperate leaves. Due to the great size variation, identifications should not be based on leaf sizes alone. Descriptions of leaf papillae density and number refer to the visible distal papillae ends. For the surface of the dorsal side of the costa, we refer to the mid-line and not to the lateral parts. When the leaf apex is mentioned, this should be understood as including about the upper fifth of the leaf. The mucro begins above the last isodiametric cell.

    1 Stem central strand present 2

    1* Stem central strand absent 6

    2 Lamina papillosity ± spaced, usually not obscuring areolation in younger leaves; leaves distinctly keeled in upper part, lanceolate to linear-lanceolate, length-width ratio (3)4–8(9):1, patent to recurved, mostly distinctly secund and undulate when moist; limb-sheath transition mostly broadly V-shaped or U-shaped (rarely W-shaped), often gradual; costa in mid-leaf covering one sixth to one eighth of leaf width 3

    2* Lamina papillosity dense, obscuring areolation in younger leaves; leaves mostly canaliculate in upper part (keeled only in deeper shade), linear-lanceolate to linear, length-width ratio 8–15:1, erecto-patent to patent, straight to weakly secund and weakly undulate when moist; limb-sheath transition mostly narrowly V-shaped and abrupt; costa in mid-leaf covering one third to one sixth of leaf width 4

    3 Adaxial side of costa at least partly covered with quadrate epidermal cells; sheath only in hygromorphic plants distinctly widened; limb in apical part often rather suddenly narrowed to apex; cylinder cells of stem cross-sections ± thin-walled, mostly yellowish to dark brown, central strand mostly thin; leafage of shoots less dense, branchlets with restricted growth absent; secondary colouration of plants brown T. commutata

    3* Midline of adaxial side of costa usually not covered with quadrate epidermal cells (elongated throughout); sheath mostly distinctly widened; limb from base gradually narrowed to apex; cylinder cells of stem cross-sections ± thick-walled, red to redbrown, central strand mostly strong; leafage of shoots very dense, older leaves (together with often many branchlets) forming a mantle around stems, therefore collections easily disintegrating; secondary colouration of plants ferrugineous T. fleischeri

    4 Costa at dorsal side smooth (or remotely papillose with tiny simple papillae); stem cross-sections rarely wider than 200 µm, hyalodermis and cortex usually indistinct, the central strand occupying a quarter to a fifth of stem diameter; plants rather small-leaved and low growing, a moderately thermophilous pioneer T. bambergeri

    4* Costa at dorsal side usually densely papillose; stem cross-sections up to 350 µm wide, hyalodermis and cortex usually distinct, the central strand occupying usually less than a fifth of stem diameter; larger montane plants (if small-leaved growing in high-alpine habitats) 5

    5 Leaf cross-sections in mid-limb with the costa dorsally protuberant and ventrally ± flat; dorsal costal papillae simple to forked; plants greyish green or yellowish, growing on rock, in moist meadows and in snow-beds, usually occurring from the high-montane to the subnival belt T. robusta

    5* Leaf cross-sections in mid-limb distinctly lunate or horseshoe-shaped with the costa dorsally hardly protuberant and ventrally mostly concave; dorsal costal papillae usually forked; plants usually light greyish glaucous (in herbarium soon bleached), mostly growing on dolomitic gravel (rarely saxicolous), mainly occurring in the mid-montane belt T. dolomitica

    6 Leaves when moist straight (or almost so) in top view, not undulate; transverse section of lower costa usually biconvex, with two rows of guide cells T. splendida

    6* Leaves when moist at least weakly secund in top view and at least weakly undulate; transverse section of lower costa semi-circular with the adaxial side flat, with only one row of guide cells (rarely single cells suggesting a second row) 7

    7 Lamina papillosity dense, obscuring areolation in younger leaves; leaves canaliculate to keeled, linear-lanceolate to linear, mostly patent and only weakly secund; costa dorsally covered with papillae (beside spines) or smooth; inner laminal cells at transition only rarely with markedly thickened cross-walls; marginal cells in mid-leaf mostly wider than long or irregular in shape T. angustifolia

    7* Lamina papillosity ± spaced and not obscuring areolation in younger leaves; leaves always keeled in upper part, patent to recurved, mostly distinctly secund when moist; costa dorsally with spines (in T. commutata rarely also papillae) or smooth; inner laminal cells at transition in mature older leaves mostly with markedly thickened cross-walls; marginal cells in mid-leaf ± isodiametric 8

    8 Leaf length-width ratio (3)4–8(9):1, at least some of them rather suddenly short-pointed; mucro mostly short and few-celled; stem cross-sections brown to redbrown with cylinder cells ± thin-walled; limb papillae in xeromorphic plants usually ± c-shaped in groups of (3)4(5) concentrated over the lumens, in hygromorphic simple, low and more evenly distributed; plants in full sun brown T. commutata

    8* Leaf length-width ratio 8–15:1, all leaves narrow-pointed; mucro usually long and narrow; stem cross-sections redbrown to red with cylinder cells ± thick-walled; limb papillae in xeromorphic plants mostly coarse and forked (rarely ± c-shaped), in hygromorphic bacillariform, rather evenly distributed over the lamina; plants in full sun ferruginous T. tortuosa

    Notes on additional type-material studied

    Barbula limosella Stirt., Ann. Scott. Nat. Hist. 16(63): 175. 1907 ≡ Tortella limosella (Stirt.) P.W.Richards & E.C.Wallace, Trans. Brit. Bryol. Soc. 1(4): XII. 1950. Type: [United Kingdom]: ‘Barbula limosella (Strn.), Scotland, On Sea-shore West of Arisaig, 20 September 1906’ (lectotype, designated here: GLAM 1927.8.4729!)): Tiny expressions of T. commutata come close to the description of this taxon, known only from a single coastal locality in western Scotland. We therefore borrowed the two type specimens from the original Stirton-herbarium at GLAM. We are able to confirm assumptions that it belongs to T. flavovirens (Bruch) Broth. s. lato. Beside shoots typical for T. limosella with a ± lingulate leaf shape, weakly toothed upper leaf margins and unipapillose to almost smooth laminal cells, we also found some shoots which seem to bridge to quite normal but small-leaved T. flavovirens, showing a more lanceolate leaf shape, smooth leaf margins and oligopapillose laminal cells. Smith (2004) assumed a relationship to T. inclinata because of the elongate adaxial cells of the costa he observed in type material. This is, however, only due to the general weakness of the costa and in somewhat coarser leaves we observed also some quadrate epidermal cells covering the middle of ventral costa surface. In our opinion, this taxon is hardly more than an extreme expression of T. flavovirens, possibly from an unusually wet habitat of a comparably cold environment. But, if that is true, similar morphs should occur also elsewhere in similar habitats. One of the two type specimens proved closer to the protologue, having hardly any intergrading shoots. We have therefore chosen it as lectotype. For comparison, we also borrowed the type material of Barbula limosa Stirt., described from the same locality, which was already treated as a synonym of T. flavovirens by Dixon (1923). These plants match T. limosella in size and habit. Microscopically, however, they show all features of T. flavovirens.

    Barbula subtortuosa Müll.Hal.: Van der Wijk et al. (1959) treated this taxon described from China as a synonym of T. tortuosa. An isotype of Giraldi 848 in H is not a Tortella but a Chionoloma (Pseudosymblepharis) sp.

    Barbula tortuosa var. fragilifolia Jur.: Köckinger and Hedenäs (2021) lectotypified the taxon and transferred it as a new variety to Tortella nitida (Lindb.) Broth.

    Barbula tortuosa var. tenella A.W.H.Walther & Molendo, Laubm. Oberfrank. 120. 1868. Type: [Germany] ‘zwischen Pegnitz und Hohlenberg, leg. Molendo 1868 (lectotype, deignated here: M-0274545!): The Molendo-herbarium at M contains only one of the two given syntypes and we select this as lectotype of the name. It represents a tiny morph of Chionoloma tenuirostre (Hook. & Tayl.) M.Alonso, M.J.Cano & J.A.Jimenez.

    Mollia thrausta Stirt.: This neglected taxon is regarded a replacement name at species rank for Barbula tortuosa var. fragilifolia Jur. by Köckinger and Hedenäs (2021).

    Tortella tortuosa var. brevifolia Breidl. ex Limpr.: Collections with this name in the original Breidler-herbarium at GJO belong to T. densa. This variety was already synonymised with the latter by Pilous (1965).

    Tortula incrassata Brid. ≡ Tortella tortuosa var. incrassata (Brid.) Brid.: The only specimen in B-Brid (B31047504) represents Tortella inclinata (c. spg.). We, however, doubt that true type-material is at hand. It may have been destroyed during World War II.

    Trichostomum sitkanum Cardot & Thér.: This taxon was described from southern Alaska and cited by Zander (1993) as a synonym of T. tortuosa var. arctica (Arnell) Broth. (ignored by Eckel 1998), which would have priority at species rank. Type-material from PC, however, is a Chionoloma (Oxystegus) sp., needing more careful study.

    Discussion

    Morphology suggests that the species of the informal T. tortuosa complex belong to two main groups. The first contains T. commutata, T. fleischeri and T. tortuosa s. str., and is characterized by 1) leaves that are lanceolate to linear-lanceolate, when moist distinctly secund (or sigmoid) and spreading to recurved, often strongly undulate and distally keeled, 2) relatively large laminal cells, at the limb–sheath-transition often with bands of thickened transverse walls, and 3) spaced, mostly coarse laminal cell papillae. The second group includes T. angustifolia, T. bambergeri, T. dolomitica and T. robusta, having 1) leaves that are linear-lanceolate to linear, when moist weakly secund (sigmoid) and erecto-patent to patent, little undulate and distally ± canaliculate, 2) relatively small laminal cells with hardly any thickened transverse bands at the limb–sheath-transition and 3) densely set and rather small papillae, characteristically obscuring the areolation in younger leaves. Tortella splendida is unique in its non-secund, non-undulate and distinctly tubulose leaves. A high, environmentally induced variation in most of these species, however, may seemingly blur the distinction. On the other hand, we observed that in mixed stands of two or more species the differences are highly stable and distinct.

    The molecular data, including the ASAP results, agree with the morphological delimitation of the taxa but suggest other relationships among the morphological entities, partly depending on which marker set is used. Like Köckinger et al. (2018), our data show that T. tortuosa in its traditional wide sense is paraphyletic. It would become monophyletic only if T. densa, T. fragilis, T. inclinata and T. pseudofragilis are included. Thus, if these taxa are recognized as species, also the entities within the traditional T. tortuosa require recognition. Incongruence among molecular data sets and between molecular and morphological data is common for closely related mosses (Draper and Hedenäs 2009, Draper et al. 2007, Harris 2008, Ignatov and Milyutina 2008, Lewis et al. 2014, Olsson et al. 2012, Sotiaux et al. 2009). In Tortella, T. tortuosa s. str. appears only remotely related to T. commutata, despite that the morphological differentiation of the two is often difficult. Tortella tortuosa, T. fleischeri and T. robusta are molecularly close to each other but these species are, on the other hand, easy to distinguish by morphology. Tortella dolomitica, T. bambergeri and T. robusta share many features but are seemingly not closely related. There could be several explanations for such incongruent patterns, including incomplete lineage sorting, rapid morphological diversification, and that plants acquired genetic material from another species through hybridisation, chloroplast transfer, or other processes (Harris 2008, Stegemann et al. 2012, Twyford and Ennos 2012, Wendel and Doyle 1998). All mechanisms, or a combination of explanations are possible, but we require additional evidence to decide which is more likely (Wendel and Doyle 1998).

    Several studies of Tortella suggest that hybridization or other exchange of genetic material occurs (Hedenäs 2015, Köckinger and Hedenäs 2017, Werner et al. 2014), but also in another Pottiaceae genus, Syntrichia, molecular relationships strongly suggest such exchange (Hedenäs et al. 2019). In several of these cases, intermediate states in some characters support the suggested exchanges of genetic material in the suggested hybrid plants. Also in the present study, we find evidence for occasional exchange of genetic material, probably through rare hybridisation occurring when females of one species happen to grow close to male plants of another species. Like in T. rigens (Hedenäs 2015), where male plants are unknown, and in Syntrichia (Hedenäs et al. 2019) the rarity of male plants in many Tortella species could favour such events. Potential hybrids were observed three times in our data set. P152 is a hybrid of T. inclinata and T. commutata and also morphologically intermediate (Fig. 1, 2), P1287 a hybrid of T. robusta and T. tortuosa, and D1490 between T. commutata and a member of the T. fragilis-T. splendida clade. The large laminal cells of specimen D1490, which had sequences from both T. commutata and the T. fragilis-T. splendida could potentially be an effect of heterosis in analogy with the similarly large laminal cells of T. rigens, which likely evolved from the hybrid T. inclinata × T. fragilis (Hedenäs 2015).

    Both molecularly and morphologically, T. commutata proved to be the most variable species. ITS data suggest that it is paraphyletic to the T. densa-T. inclinata lineage, whereas plastid data suggest a rather isolated position and no close affinities to this lineage. Tortella commutata is by far the most frequently sporophyte-bearing species of the complex, which may help to explain its high variability. On the other hand, T. fleischeri and T. dolomitica are the genetically least variable taxa, which coincides with restricted distribution areas and narrow ecological amplitudes, the latter agreeing with the general trend pointed out by Habel and Schmitt (2018).

    The segregation of numerous species from a single, widespread, and well-known one may seem strange at first. However, analogous situations occur in other supposedly well-known European species, for example Hedwigia ciliata (Hedw.) P.Beauv. s. l. (Buchbender et al. 2014, Hedenäs 1994, Ignatova et al. 2016) and especially Schistidium apocarpum (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp. s.l. (Blom 1996; and several later works). Indeed, for some time we considered treating the members of the T. tortuosa complex as subspecific taxa. However, when the molecular evidence showed that they form independent evolutionary lineages that do not all belong to a monophyletic group, and that such a treatment would necessitate the reduction of other well-known Tortella species to subspecific taxa, this idea fell. Obviously, to treat the eight elements as species reflects their nature as independent evolutionary lineages. They are sufficiently distinct from each other, and each of them shows the normal variation found within species and differ markedly in ecological preferences, implying chorologically reasonable distribution areas. The percentage of potential hybrids among the studied specimens is low (3 out of 99, or 3%) compared with percentages between 8–28% found between morphologically well-differentiated species in some other studies of mosses (Hedenäs 2022, Hedenäs et al. 2019). Furthermore, it has to be considered that besides T. tortuosa, three segregates, T. bambergeri, T. fleischeri and T. splendida (as T. arctica auct.), were already treated at species level in the past and only one of the eight taxa, T. dolomitica is something totally ‘new’. Tortella commutata was often named T. tortuosa var. fragilifolia, see Köckinger and Hedenäs (2021). Tortella tortuosa, like H. ciliata and S. apocarpum, is thus another example of earlier species lumping due to a poor understanding of the taxa.

    As already presumed by Eckel (1998), Europe, with currently 24 species, appears to be the centre of Northern Hemisphere Tortella evolution. In particular, the Alps, with large mountain ranges built of limestone, dolomite, and calcareous schist, reaching > 4000 m a.s.l., and the adjacent Mediterranean basin, offer an enormous variety of habitats for such a calciphilous genus. This area is also climatically diverse, from desert-like conditions up to an annual precipitation maximum of 5000 mm in Montenegro. Only four of the eight species of the complex are known from Scandinavia and the reasons may be diverse. This area is probably not sufficiently warm for T. bambergeri, the absence of T. dolomitica may be explained by the relative rarity of dolomite and T. fleischeri might represent a relatively young species that evolved in the high mountain ranges of central and southern Europe. T. splendida (including T. arctica auct.) belongs to a special group of cryophilous high-mountain species, containing e. g. Didymodon giganteus (Funck) Jur., Oreas martiana (Hoppe & Hornsch.) Brid. and Molendoa hornschuchiana (Hook.) Lindb. ex Limpr. s. l., which are absent from Scandinavia but reach the Arctic both in Asia and North America. The reason is probably the total or almost total glaciation of northern Europe during the Pleistocene, and these species, which are demanding regarding their habitat, were seemingly unable to recolonize this area afterwards.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank the curators of B, BM, CHUR, G, GJO, GLAM, GZU, H, M, PC, PR, RO, UPS and W for generous help with loans or assistance during visits. Furthermore, we thank S. Biedermann, T. Blockeel, P. Erzberger, D. Holyoak, V. Hugonnot, U. Graf, T. Kiebacher, M. Lüth, P. Martin, M. Meier, L. Meinunger, H. van Melick, G. Schlüsslmayr and H. Wittmann for providing private collections.

    Funding – Riksmusei Vänner (February 2016) and Carl Tryggers Stiftelse (CTS, project no. 16:183) funded the molecular portions of this investigation.

    © The Authors. This is an Open Access article

    Data availability statement

    Data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository:  https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.ngflvhj0b (Köckinger and Hedenäs 2023).

    References

    1.

    Blom, H. H. 1996. A revision of the Schistidium apocarpum complex in Norway and Sweden. – Bryophyt. Biblioth. 49: 1–333. Google Scholar

    2.

    Buchbender, V., Hespanhol, H., Krug, M., Sérgio, C., Séneca, A., Maul, K., Hedenäs, L. and Quandt, D. 2014. Phylogenetic reconstructions of the Hedwigiaceae reveal cryptic speciation and hybridisation in Hedwigia. – Bryophyt. Divers. Evol. 1: 1–21. Google Scholar

    3.

    Crundwell, A. C. and Nyholm, E. 1963. Notes on the genus Tortella II. Tortella arctica. – Bryologist 66: 184–191. Google Scholar

    4.

    Dirkse, G. M. and Losada-Lima, A. 2012. Additions and amendments to the moss flora of the Canary Islands. – Cryptog. Bryol. 32: 37–41. Google Scholar

    5.

    Dixon, H. N. 1923. Dr. Stirton´s new British mosses revised. – J. Bot. 61: 10–17, 46–52, 69–75. Google Scholar

    6.

    Draper, I., Hedenäs, L. and Grimm, G. W. 2007. Molecular and morphological incongruence in European species of Isothecium (Bryophyta). – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 42: 700–716. Google Scholar

    7.

    Draper, I. and Hedenäs, L. 2009. Circumscription of European taxa within the Sciuro-hypnum reflexum complex (Brachytheciaceae, Bryophyta), based on molecular and morphological data. – Taxon 58: 572–584. Google Scholar

    8.

    Eckel, P. M. 1998. Re-evaluation of Tortella (Musci, Pottiaceae) in conterminous U.S.A. and Canada with a treatment of the European species Tortella nitida. – Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 36: 117–191. Google Scholar

    9.

    Eckel, P. M. 2010. Tortella bambergeri in North America and an evaluation of its taxonomy. – Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 39: 1–10. Google Scholar

    10.

    Ellis, L. T. and Price, M. J. 2013. A lectotype for Tortella tortuosa (Hedw.) Limpr. (Pottiaceae). – J. Bryol. 35: 216–219. Google Scholar

    11.

    Feliner, G. N. and Rosselló, J. A. 2007. Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44: 911–919. Google Scholar

    12.

    Goloboff, P., Farris, J. and Nixon, K. 2003. Tree analysis using new technology. –  http://www.lillo.org.ar/phylogeny/tnt/Google Scholar

    13.

    Habel, J. C. and Schmitt, T. 2018. Vanishing of the common species: empty habitats and the role of genetic diversity. – Biol. Conserv. 218: 211–216. Google Scholar

    14.

    Harris, E. S. J. 2008. Paraphyly and multiple causes of phylogenetic incongruence in the moss genus Plagiomnium (Mniaceae). – Taxon 57: 417–433. Google Scholar

    15.

    Hassel, K. and Høitomt, T. 2013. Tortella vrimoseslekta i Norge, nye arter og arter vi kan være på utkikk etter. – Blyttia 71: 215–224. Google Scholar

    16.

    Hedenäs, L. 1994. The Hedwigia ciliata complex in Sweden, with notes on the occurrence of the taxa in Fennoscandia. – J. Bryol. 18: 139–157. Google Scholar

    17.

    Hedenäs, L. 2015. Tortella rigens (Bryophyta, Pottiaceae): relationships, regional variation, and conservation aspects. – Plant Syst. Evol. 301: 1361–1375. Google Scholar

    18.

    Hedenäs, L. 2019. On the frequency of northern and mountain genetic variants of widespread species: essential biodiversity information in a warmer world. – Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 191: 440–474. Google Scholar

    19.

    Hedenäs, L. 2022. Potentially misleading phylogenetic signal and its explanation in single species studies – Contrasting Loeskypnum badium, Sarmentypnum exannulatum and Warnstorfia fluitans. – Bryologist 125: 102–114. Google Scholar

    20.

    Hedenäs, L., Heinrichs, J. and Gallego, M. T. 2019. The Scandinavian Syntrichia ruralis complex (Musci, Pottiaceae): a chaos of diversification. – Plant Syst. Evol. 305: 639–661. Google Scholar

    21.

    Huson, D. H. and Bryant, D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 254–267. Google Scholar

    22.

    Ignatov, M. S. and Milyutina, I. A. 2008. A revision of the genus Sciuro-hypnum (Brachytheciaceae, Bryophyta) in Russia. – Arctoa 16: 63–86. Google Scholar

    23.

    Ignatova, E. A., Kuznetsova, O. I., Fedosov, V. E. and Ignatova, M. S. 2016. On the genus Hedwigia (Hedwigiaceae, Bryophyta) in Russia. – Arctoa 25: 241–277. Google Scholar

    24.

    Juratzka, J. 1882. Die Laubmoosflora von Oesterreich-Ungarn. – W. Braumüller. Google Scholar

    25.

    Köckinger, H. and Hedenäs, L. 2017. A farewell to Tortella bambergeri (Pottiaceae) as understood over the last decades. – J. Bryol. 39: 213–225. Google Scholar

    26.

    Köckinger, H. and Hedenäs, L. 2021. Solving nomenclatural problems surrounding Mollia thrausta Stirt., Barbula tortuosa var. fragilifolia Jur. and Tortella fasciculata (Culm.) Culm. – J. Bryol. 43: 186–189. Google Scholar

    27.

    Köckinger, H. and Hedenäs, L. 2023. Data from: The supposedly well-known carbonate indicator Tortella tortuosa (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) split into eight species in Europe. – Dryad Digital Repository,  https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.ngflvhj0bGoogle Scholar

    28.

    Köckinger, H., Suanjak, M., Schriebl, A. and Schröck, C. 2008. Die Moose Kärntens. – Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten. Google Scholar

    29.

    Köckinger, H., Lüth, M., Werner, O. and Ros, R. M. 2018. Tortella mediterranea (Pottiaceae), a new species from southern Europe, its molecular affinities, and taxonomic notes on T. nitida. – Bryologist 121: 560–570. Google Scholar

    30.

    Košnar, J., Herbstová, M., Kolář, F., Koutecký, P. and Kučera, J. 2012. A case of intragenomic ITS variation in bryophytes: assessment of gene flow and role of plyploidy in the origin of European taxa of the Tortula muralis (Musci: Pottiaceae) complex. – Taxon 61: 709–720. Google Scholar

    31.

    Lewis, L. R., Rozzi, R. and Goffinet, B. 2014. Direct long-distance dispersal shapes a New World amphitropical disjunction in the dispersal-limited dung moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). – J. Biogeogr. 41: 2385–2395. Google Scholar

    32.

    Müller, K. 2005. SeqState. – Appl. Bioinf. 4: 65–69. Google Scholar

    33.

    Olsson, S., Enroth, J., Huttunen, S. and Quandt, D. 2012. ForsstroemiaLindb.(Neckeraceae)revisited.–J.Bryol.34:114–122. Google Scholar

    34.

    Otnyukova, T. N., Ignatova, E. A., Ignatov, M. S. and Fedosov, V. E. 2004. New records of Tortella alpicola Dix. inEurasia. – Arctoa 13: 197–201. Google Scholar

    35.

    Pilous, Z. 1961. Mechová vegetace Demänovské doliny v Nízkých Tatrách. – Čzechoslovenské Acad. Vĕd a Umeĕní 71: 1–99. Google Scholar

    36.

    Pilous, Z. 1965. Fragmenta bryologica 51–60. – Preslia 37: 13–26. Google Scholar

    37.

    Puillandre, N., Brouillet, S. and Achaz, G. 2019. ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. – Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21: 609–620. Google Scholar

    38.

    Rams, S., Ros, R. M. and Werner, O. 2006. Tortella alpicola (Pottiaceae) from Spain, new to western Europe. – Bryologist 109: 404–407. Google Scholar

    39.

    Renauld, F. 1882. Notice sur quelques mousses des Pyrénées (Suite). – Rev. Bryol. 9: 90–94. Google Scholar

    40.

    Roth, G. 1910. Neuere und noch weniger bekannte europäische Laubmoose. – Hedwigia 49: 213–229. Google Scholar

    41.

    Savicz-Ljubitzkaja, L. I. 1961. Notulae de Barbula gigantea Funck et Trichostomo cuspidatissimo Card. et Ther. – Not. Syst. e Sect. Crypt. Inst. Bot. Nomine V. L. Komarovii Acad. Sci. USSR 14: 262–267. Google Scholar

    42.

    Schlüsslmayr, G. 2019. Die Moose des Dachsteingebirges. – Stapfia 108: 1–737. Google Scholar

    43.

    Shaw, A. J., McDaniel, S. F., Werner, O. and Ros, R. M. 2002. New frontiers in bryology and lichenology. Phylogeography and phylodemography. – Bryologist 105: 373–383. Google Scholar

    44.

    Simmons, M. P. and Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. – Syst. Biol. 49: 369–381. Google Scholar

    45.

    Smith, A. J. E. 2004. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. 2nd edn. – Cambridge Univ. Press. Google Scholar

    46.

    Sotiaux, A., Enroth, J., Olsson, S., Quandt, D. and Vanderpoorten, A. 2009. When morphology and molecules tell us different stories: a case-in-point with Leptodon corsicus, a new and unique endemic moss species from Corsica. – J. Bryol. 31: 186–196. Google Scholar

    47.

    Stegemann, S., Keuthe, M., Greiner, S. and Bock, R. 2012. Horizontal transfer of chloroplast genomes between plant species. – Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109: 2434–2438. Google Scholar

    48.

    Twyford, A. D. and Ennos, R. A. 2012. Next-generation hybridization and introgression. – Heredity 108: 179–189. Google Scholar

    49.

    Van der Wijk, R., Margadant, W. D. and Florschütz, P. A. 1959. Index Muscorum, vol. I (A-C). – Regnum Veg. 17: 1–548. Google Scholar

    50.

    Wendel, J. F. and Doyle, J. J. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. – In: Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. and Doyle, J. J. (eds), Molecular systematics of plants II. DNA sequencing. Chapman and Hall, pp. 265–296. Google Scholar

    51.

    Werner, O., Ros, R. M. and Grundmann, M. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of Trichostomoideae (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) based on nrITS sequence data. – Taxon 54: 361–368. Google Scholar

    52.

    Werner, O., Köckinger, H., Magdy, M. and Ros, R. M. 2014. On the systematic position of Tortella arctica and Trichostomum arcticum (Bryophyta, Pottiaceae). – Nova Hedw. 98: 273–293. Google Scholar

    53.

    Zander, R. H. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: mosses of harsh environments. – Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 32: 1–378. Google Scholar

    54.

    Zodda, G. 1907. Primo contributo alla briologia della Provincia di Belluno. – Malpighia 21: 479–511. Google Scholar

    Appendices

    Appendix 1.

    Specimen data and GenBank accession numbers for the studied Tortella specimens. Sequences newly generated for the present investigation have GenBank accession numbers beginning with ‘OQ’. All specimens except those for which sequences were downloaded from GenBank are located in herbarium S; for these only the S registration number is provided (beginning with a ‘B’). Further information on S specimens is available at  http://herbarium.nrm.se/. GenBank specimens have the name under which they were filed in GenBank appended to their arbitrarily assigned GB-numbers (GB1, GB2, etc.). Data format: Sample No.: Locality; Coll. Year, Collector [collector’s No.] (HK= H.Köckinger; LH= L.Hedenäs); Herbarium with registration No. / S registration No.; Genbank accession numbers for ITS; atpB-rbcL; rps4 (NA: Not Available).

    Tortella angustifolia (Jur.) Köckinger & Hedenäs. P493: Austria. Styria, Ennstaler Alpen, Haindlkar; 2006, HK 15052; B248483; OQ102411; OQ132571; OQ132594. P495: Austria. Styria, Seckauer Tauern, Hämmerkogel; 2016, HK 15054; B248485; OQ102413; OQ132573; OQ132596. P501: Sweden. Södermanland, Utö; 2014, LH; B211231; MK456331; MK467386; MK466857. P505: Sweden. Gotland, Gammelgarn; 2016, LH; B235952; MK456334; MK467389; MK466860. P511: Austria. Kärnten, Karawanken, Uschowa; 2014, HK 15032; B248495; OQ102420; OQ132580; OQ132603. P514: Austria. Steiermark, Hochschwab, Pfaffenstein; 2014, HK 15035; B248496; OQ102423; OQ132583; OQ132606. D1246: Sweden. Gotland, Bunge; 2016, LH; B235977; MK456335; MK467390; MK466861. D1482: Sweden. Torne Lappmark, Jukkasjärvi, Låktatjåkka; 2017, LH; B256667; MK456382; MK467437; MK466908.

    Tortella bambergeri (Schimp.) Broth. P149: Austria. Carinthia, Gurktal, Passering; 2003, HK 12334; B196700; KM020631; KM020520; KM020740. P508: Austria. Steiermark, Oberes Murtal, Eppenstein; 2014, HK 15029; B248497; OQ102417; OQ132577; OQ132600. D1505: United Kingdom. England, Gloucs; 1997, D.T.Holyoak 97-279; B279659; OQ102427; OQ132587; OQ132610.

    Tortella commutata Köckinger & Hedenäs. P100: Sweden. Gotland, Stenkyrka; 2001, LH; B62094; B62094; KM020625; KM020514; KM020734. P150: United Kingdom. N. Ireland, Fermanagh; 1993, T.Hallingbäck 42536; B240756; KM020632, KM020522, KM020741. P494: Austria. Carinthia, Oberfederaun; 2016, HK 15055; B248484; OQ102412; OQ132572; OQ132595. P496: Austria. Steiermark, Eisenerzer Alpen, Lamingsattel; 2014, HK 15037; B248486; OQ102414; OQ132574; OQ132597. P498: Sweden. Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, Mávasjávrre; 2015, LH et al.; B227353; MK456328; MK467383; MK466854. P500: Sweden. Uppland, Väddö, Nothamn; 2015, LH; B227328; MK456330; MK467385; MK466856. P504: Sweden. Södermanland, Utö; 2015, LH; B222165; MK456333; MK467388; MK466859. P513: Austria. Steiermark, Hochschwab, Mt. Hochblaser; 2013, HK 15034; B248493; OQ102422; OQ132582; OQ132605. D1247: Sweden. Södermanland, Sorunda; 2014, LH; B207931; MK456336; MK467391; MK466862. D1257: Sweden. Härjedalen, Hede; 2007, LH et al.; B121313; MK456346; MK467401; MK466872. D1266: Sweden. Jämtland, Frostviken, Mt. Brakkfjället; 2009, LH; B164442; MK456354; MK467409; MK466880. D1267: Sweden. Jämtland, Frostviken, Mt. Brakkfjället; 2009, LH; B164448; MK456355; MK467410; MK466881. D1281: Sweden. Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, Mávasjávrre; 2015, LH et al.; B223765; MK456369; MK467424; MK466895. D1485: Sweden. Pite lappmark, Arjeplog, Mt. Skärrim; 2017, LH et al.; B258074; MK456384; MK467439; MK466910. D1487: Sweden. Pite lappmark, Arjeplog, Mt. Tjidtják; 2017, LH et al.; B258365; MK456386; MK467441; MK466912. D1489: Sweden. Pite lappmark, Arjeplog, Mt. Tjidtják; 2017, LH et al.; B258533; MK456387; MK467442; MK466913. Potential T. commutata hybrids. commutata-fragilis hybrid?: D1490: Sweden. Pite lappmark, Arjeplog, Vuoggatjålme; 2017, LH et al.; B258576; MK456388; MK467443; MK466914. commutata-inclinata hybrid?: P152: Sweden. Dalsland, Skållerud, Ryr; 1986, T.Hallingbäck 1452; B240755; KM020633; KM020523; KM020743.

    Tortella commutata var. valida Köckinger & Hedenäs. D1250: Sweden. Västmanland, Nora, Skofthyttan; 2015, LH; B226620; MK456339; MK467394; MK466865. D1252: Sweden. Öland, Ventlinge; 2016, LH; B236101; MK456341; MK467396; MK466867. D1507: Austria. Styria, Dachstein, Maralm; 2017, HK 15139; B279661; OQ102429; OQ132589; OQ132612. D1508: Austria. Styria, Oberes Murtal, Oberweg; 2017, HK 15140; B279662; OQ102430; OQ132590; OQ132613.

    Tortella dolomitica Köckinger & Hedenäs. P148: Austria. Carinthia, Gailtaler Alpen, Weissensee; 2008, HK 14934; B196699; KM020630; KM020519; KM020739. P509: Austria. Niederösterreich, Kalkalpen, Ötschergräben; 2011, HK 15030; B248498; OQ102418; OQ132578; OQ132601. D1506: Austria. Styria, Hochschwab, Seewiesen; 2015, HK 15142; B279660; OQ102428; OQ132588; OQ132611.

    Tortella fleischeri (E.Bauer) J.J.Amann. P146: Austria. Styria, Eisenerzer Alpen, Reichenstein; 2012, HK 14932; B196697; KM020628; KM020517; KM020737. P147: Austria. Carinthia, Karawanken, Trögener Klamm; 2012, HK 14933; B196698; KM020629; KM020518; KM020738. P506: Austria. Steiermark, Eisenerzer Alpen, Moosalm; 2014, HK 15027; B248488; OQ102415; OQ132575; OQ132598. P507: Austria. Salzburg, Radstädter Tauern, Kl. Kesselspitze; 2014, HK 15028; B248489; OQ102416; OQ132576; OQ132599. GB2-tortuosa: Italy. Trentino-Alto Adige; M.Grundmann 010115; BM; AY854423; AY950343; AY950388.

    Tortella robusta (Pfeff.) Köckinger & Hedenäs. P497: Sweden. Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, Mávasjávrre; 2015, LH et al.; B226772; MK456327; MK467382; MK466853. P510: Austria. Salzburg, Radstädter Tauern, Zallinwand; 2014, HK 15031; B248490; OQ102419; OQ132579; OQ132602. D1263: Sweden. Jämtland, Frostviken, Gervenåkko; 1988, LH J88-508; B42347; MK456351; MK467406; MK466877. D1276: Sweden. Lycksele lappmark, Tärna, Mt. Guhkiesvaerie; 2016, LH; B237366; MK456364; MK467419; MK466890. D1277: Sweden. Lycksele lappmark, Tärna, Mt. Raavriedenjuenie; 2016, LH; B238810; MK456365; MK467420; MK466891. D1283: Sweden. Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, Mávasjávrre; 2015, LH et al.; B226183; MK456371; MK467426; MK466897. D1478: Sweden. Torne Lappmark, Jukkasjärvi, Björkliden; 2017, LH; B256565; MK456378; MK467433; MK466904. D1479: Sweden. Torne Lappmark, Jukkasjärvi, Björkliden; 2017, LH; B256650; MK456379; MK467434; MK466905. D1480: Sweden. Torne Lappmark, Jukkasjärvi, Björkliden; 2017, LH; B256655; MK456380; MK467435; MK466906. D1481: Sweden. Torne Lappmark, Jukkasjärvi, Låktatjåkka; 2017, LH; B256656; MK456381; MK467436; MK466907. D1483: Sweden. Torne Lappmark, Jukkasjärvi, Låktatjåkka; 2017, LH; B256691; MK456383; MK467438; MK466909. D1486: Sweden. Pite lappmark, Arjeplog, Mt. Själbmá; 2017, LH et al.; B258191; MK456385; MK467440; MK466911. GB1-tortuosa: Canada. British Columbia, Comox-Strathcona; 2002, J.C.Vogel; BM-824495; AY854424; AY950344; AY950389. Potential T. robusta hybrid. robusta-tortuosa hybrid?: D1287: Sweden. Åsele Lappmark, Vilhelmina, Klimpfjäll; 2004, LH; B98835; MK456375; MK467430; MK466901.

    Tortella splendida Köckinger & Hedenäs. P492: Austria. Salzburg, Radstädter Tauern, Gamsleitenspitze; 2015, HK 15053; B248482; OQ102410; OQ132570; OQ132593. P515: Austria. Steiermark, Hochschwab, Trenchtling; 2013, HK 15036; B248499; OQ102424; OQ132584; OQ132607. P139: Canada. Northwest Territories (Nunavut). Bathurst I.; 1973, R.R.Ireland & I.Brodo 16585; B196676; KM020609, KM020498, KM020718. GB1-arctica: Greenland; ---; MSUN-0795-867.1; AY854411; AY950331; AY950376. GB2-arctica: Russia. Wrangel Island; 1985, O.M.Afonina; BM; AY854410; AY950330; AY950375.

    Tortella tortuosa (Hedw.) Limpr. P101: Sweden. Medelpad, Borgsjö; 2006, LH; B116614; KM020626; KM020515; KM020735. P133: Sweden. Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, Lake Stuorsavvun; 2006, LH et al.; B116150; KM020627; KM020516; KM020736. P138: Sweden. Jämtland, Åre, Silverfallet; 2010, LH; B182517; KM020640; KM020530; KM020750. P499: Sweden. Uppland, Väddö, Nothamn; 2015, LH; B227328; MK456329; MK467384; MK466855. P503: Sweden. Södermanland, Utö; 2015, LH; B222165; MK456332; MK467387; MK466858. P512: Austria. Salzburg, Lungau, Mauterndorf; 2014, HK 15033; B248491; OQ102421; OQ132581; OQ132604. D1248: Sweden. Uppland, Djurö; 2014, LH; B208360; MK456337; MK467392; MK466863. D1249: Sweden. Västmanland, Sala; 2012, LH; B194146; MK456338; MK467393; MK466864. D1251: Sweden. Västmanland, Nora, Bergsmanshyttan; 2015, LH; B226644; MK456340; MK467395; MK466866. D1253: Sweden. Dalarna, Hamra; 2000, LH; B37571; MK456342; MK467397; MK466868. D1254: Sweden. Hälsingland, Los; 2008, LH et al.; B143504; MK456343; MK467398; MK466869. D1255: Sweden. Hälsingland, Gnarp; 2010, LH; B175718; MK456344; MK467399; MK466870. D1256: Sweden. Hälsingland, Idenor; 2010, M.H.G.Gustafsson 1165; B176118; MK456345; MK467400; MK466871. D1258: Sweden. Härjedalen, Linsell; 2007, LH et al.; B122066; MK456347; MK467402; MK466873. D1260: Sweden. Härjedalen, Tännäs; 2014, LH; B207542; MK456348; MK467403; MK466874. D1261: Sweden. Härjedalen, Överhogdal; 2016, LH; B242191; MK456349; MK467404; MK466875. D1262: Sweden. Härjedalen, Överhogdal; 2016, LH; B242212; MK456350; MK467405; MK466876. D1264: Sweden. Jämtland, Kall; 2005, LH; B104601; MK456352; MK467407; MK466878. D1265: Sweden. Jämtland, Undersåker; 2005, LH; B107619; MK456353; MK467408; MK466879. D1268: Sweden. Jämtland, Ragunda; 2014, LH; B204243; MK456356; MK467411; MK466882. D1269: Sweden. Jämtland, Ragunda; 2014, LH; B204319; MK456357; MK467412; MK466883. D1270: Sweden. Medelpad, Torp; 2006, LH; B116591; MK456358; MK467413; MK466884. D1271: Sweden. Ångermanland, Viksjö; 2013, LH et al.; B199882; MK456359; MK467414; MK466885. D1272: Sweden. Lule Lappmark, Kvikkjokk; 1981, LH; B217597; MK456360; MK467415; MK466886. D1273: Sweden. Lycksele Lappmark, Tärna, Hemavan; 2012, LH et al.; B195149; MK456361; MK467416; MK466887. D1274: Sweden. Lycksele Lappmark, Tärna, Hemavan-Klippen; 2012, LH et al.; B196032; MK456362; MK467417; MK466888. D1275: Sweden. Lycksele Lappmark, Björksele; 1986, LH; B216891; MK456363; MK467418; MK466889. D1278: Sweden. Norrbotten, Pajala, Isonkivenmaa; 1990, LH & M.Aronsson NT90-120; B42350; MK456366; MK467421; MK466892. D1279: Sweden. Norrbotten, Tärendö, Orjakursu; 1990, LH & M.Aronsson NT90-780; B42352; MK456367; MK467422; MK466893. D1280: Sweden. Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, Stuorsavvun; 2006, LH et al.; B116490; MK456368; MK467423; MK466894. D1282: Sweden. Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, Mávasjávrre; 2015, LH et al.; B224590; MK456370; MK467425; MK466896. D1284: Sweden. Västerbotten, Skellefteå, Häbbersfors; 2016, LH & G.Odelvik; B237123; MK456372; MK467427; MK466898. D1285: Sweden. Västerbotten, Skellefteå, Häbbersfors; 2016, LH & G.Odelvik; B239307; MK456373; MK467428; MK466899. D1286: Sweden. Åsele Lappmark, Dorotea, Harrsjö; 2004, LH; B96083; MK456374; MK467429; MK466900. D1476: Sweden. Torne Lappmark, Jukkasjärvi, Nikkaluokta; 2017, LH & I.Bisang; B254742; MK456376; MK467431; MK466902. D1477: Sweden. Torne Lappmark, Jukkasjärvi, Kaisepakte; 2017, LH; B254923; MK456377; MK467432; MK466903. D1509: Austria. Styria, Seckauer Tauern, Rabengraben; 2018, HK 15141; B279663; OQ102431; OQ132591; OQ132614. D1510: Austria. Styria, Oberes Murtal, Auerlinggraben; 2018, HK 15138; B279664; OQ102432; OQ132592; OQ132615. GB3-tortuosa: Canada. Newfoundland, T.A.J.Hedderson 5548; BM; AY854422; AY950342; AY950387.

    OUTGROUP TAXA: Tortella alpicola Dixon. GB3-alpicola: Argentina. La Rioja; Cano et al. 4282; MUB; KT380403; KT380178; NA.

    Tortella densa (Lorentz & Molendo) Crundw. & Nyholm. P136: Sweden. Gotland, Boge; 1997, LH; B42917; KM020638, KM020528, KM020748. P137: Norway. Hordaland, Stord; 1990, N.Hakelier; B184679; KM020639, KM020529, KM020749. GB1-densa: Ireland. Claire; 1992, E.Wiltshire; BM; AY854412; AY950332; AY950377.

    Tortella fasciculata (Culm.) Culm. P129: Hungary; 1936, A.Boros; B186073; KM020614, KM020503, KM020723. P130: United Kingdom. Scotland. Gleann Beag; 1963, A.C.Crundwell; B196677; KM020615, KM020504, KM020724. P151: Sweden. Dalsland, Steneby; 1986, T.Hallingbäck 44374; herb. Hallingbäck; KM020618, KM020507, KM020727.

    Tortella fragilis (Drumm.) Limpr. P98: Sweden. Södermanland, Utö, Ålö; 2010, LH; B176012; KM020622, KM020511, KM020731. P99: Sweden. Pite Lappmark, Arjeplog, Lake Stuorsavvun; 2006, LH et al.; B114557; KM020623, KM020512, KM020732. P132: Norway. Finnmark, Söröysund, Seiland; 2001, LH; B59844; KM020624, KM020513, KM020733. D1259: Sweden. Härjedalen, Tännäs; 2014, LH; B207478; OQ102425; OQ132585; OQ132608. D1488: Sweden. Pite lappmark, Arjeplog, Mt. Tjidtják; 2017, LH et al.; B258385; OQ102426; OQ132586; OQ132609. GB1-fragilis: Greenland; F.J.A.Daniels; MSUN-0795-869.5; AY854417; AY950337; AY950382. GB2-fragilis: Russia. Gorno-Altai; 1991, M.Ignatov; BM; AY854416; AY950336; AY950381.

    Tortella inclinata (R.Hedw.) Limpr. P113: Sweden. Södermanland, Oaxen; 2003, T.Hallingbäck 39628; B184931; KM020634, KM020524, KM020744. P117: Sweden. Södermanland, Mörkö, Oaxen; 1984, LH; B196111; KM020635, KM020525, KM020745. P134: Sweden, Värmland, Filipstad; 2010, LH & G.Odelvik; B179320; KM020636, KM020526, KM020746. P135: Sweden. Västmanland, Sala; 2011, LH et al.; B185169; KM020637, KM020527, KM020747. GB1-inclinata: Germany. Northrhine-Westphalia; C.Schmidt; BM-824494; AY854420; AY950340; AY950385.

    Tortella pseudofragilis (Thér.) Köckinger & Hedenäs. P95: Austria. Oberoesterreich, Koppenwinkel Alm; 1962, J.Froehlich; B196096; KM020611, KM020500, KM020720. P96: Austria. Ostalpen, Karawanken; 1975, J.Poelt (Pl. Graec., Bryoph. 2); B196097; KM020612, KM020501, KM020721.

    Tortella spitsbergensis (Bizot & Thér.) O. Werner, Köckinger & Ros. GB4-spitsbergensis: Russia. Buryat Republic; Afonina & Tubanova 348; MUB; KT380399; KT380174; NA.

    Appendix 2.

    Selected additional specimens studied. When collected by HK, deposited in GZU and with duplicates in his private herbarium.

    Tortella angustifolia (Jur.) Köckinger & Hedenäs. Austria: Carinthia: Karnische Alpen, Weidenburger Wasserfall; 2016, HK 15355. Karawanken Mts., SW Pöckau; 2016, HK 15356. Salzburg: Radstädter Tauern, Greschlalm; 2019, HK 15369. Schladminger Tauern, Steirische Kalkspitze; 2018, HK 15357. Schladminger Tauern, Gurpitscheck; 2019, HK 15358. Styria: Schladminger Tauern, Ursprungalm; 2018, HK 15353. Schladminger Tauern, Schiedeck; 2019, HK 15352. Wölzer Tauern, Gullinggraben; 2020, HK 15354. Triebener Tauern, Gr. Schober; 2018, HK 15351. Haller Mauern Mts., Grabneralm; 2019; HK 15345. Eisenerzer Alpen, Zeiritzkampel; 2018, HK 15346. Eisenerzer Alpen, Putzenmauer NW Wald; 2018, HK 15347. Hochschwab Mts., Trenchtling; 2015, HK 15344. Hochschwab Mts., Türnach; 2019, HK 15340. Hochschwab Mts., Bodenbauer; 2019, HK 15342. Hochschwab Mts., Mieserkogel; 2019, HK 15343. Hochschwab Mts., Sagmäuer NE Aflenz; 2018, HK 15341. Oberes Murtal, Kienberg S Judenburg; 2018, HK 15349. Oberes Murtal, Jahnstein SW Weißkirchen; 2018, HK 15348. Oberes Murtal, Ruine Eppenstein; 2018, HK 15339. Grazer Bergland, Gamskogel; 2020, HK 15350. Upper Austria: Dachstein, Hunerkogel; 2015, G. Schlüsslmayr s. n., GZU. Montenegro: Durmitor Mts., Zabljak; 2004, P. Erzberger 10435, GZU. Norway: Hordaland: Tysnes; 2019, T. Kiebacher s. n., GZU. Switzerland: Kt. Uri: Sustenpass, Sustenjoch; 2020, M. Lüth 9091, GZU. United Kingdom: Northern Ireland: Co. Fermanagh, Crossmurrin; 2000, D. Holyoak 00-134, GZU. Wales: Breconshire, Darren Cilau; 2017, P. Martin s. n., GZU. Scotland: W-Sutherland, Loch na Gainmhich; 2015, M. Lüth 8203, GZU.

    Tortella bambergeri (Schimp.) Broth. Austria: Carinthia: Villach, Ruine Federaun; 2015, HK 15301. Drautal, Wildensteiner Wasserfall; 2016, HK 15302. Görtschitztal, Eberstein; 2015, HK 15304. Lavamünd, Burgstallkogel; 2001, HK 15303. Lower Austria: Thayatal, Kobergraben; 2011, H. Hagel s. n., GZU. Styria: Eisenerzer Alpen, Kammern; 2006, HK 15299. Oberes Murtal, Liechtensteinberg; 2019, HK 15305. Oberes Murtal, Baierdorf bei Judenburg; 2019, HK 15318. Oberes Murtal, NW Ruine Eppenstein; 2006, HK 15306; 2019, HK 15307, 15308, 15309. Oberes Murtal, Mühldorf; 2015, HK 15310. Oberes Murtal, W Eppenstein; 2020, HK 15311. Grazer Bergland, Pfaffenkogel; 2017, HK 15313, 15314, 15315, 15316, 15317. Grazer Bergland, Gamskogel; 2020, HK 15312. Germany: Baden-Württemberg: Kr. Emmendingen, Schuttertal; 1999, L. Meinunger s. n., GZU. Spain: Sierra del Calar del Mundo, Arroyo de la Puerta; M. Nieves Jiménez & R. M. Ros, MUB 1621; dupl. in GZU. United Kingdom: England: Dovedale; 1992, priv. herb. T. Blockeel 21/006.

    Tortella commutata Köckinger & Hedenäs. Albania: Prokletije Mts., Valbona Valley NP; 2014, P. Erzberger 18352, GZU. Austria: Carinthia: Nockberge Mts., Winklgraben; 2018, HK 15424. Friesach, Stadtmauer; 2017, HK 15423. Klagenfurter Becken, Oberjeserz; 2005, HK 15422. Lower Austria: Waldviertel, Kaltenberg-West; 2005, H. Hagel s. n., GZU. Salzburg: Schladminger Tauern, Obertauern; 2019, HK 15425. Styria: Triebener Tauern, Peilsteiner Wand; 2018, HK 15419. Seckauer Tauern, Stubalmgraben; 2018, HK 15420. Hochschwab Mts., Hochblaser; 2015, HK 15409. Hochschwab Mts., Türnach; 2019, HK 15410. Hochschwab Mts., Leitneralm; 2019, HK 15417. Hochschwab Mts., Obere Dullwitz; 2015, HK 15411. Schneealpe, Lohmgraben; 2017, HK 15421. Oberes Murtal, Weißkirchen; 2018, HK 15415. Tyrol: Matrei in Osttirol, Sudetendeutsche Hütte; 2019, T. Kiebacher 2255, GZU. France: Isére, La Balme les Grottes; 2020, V. Hugonnot s. n., GZU. Greece: Pindos Vikos-Aoos NP, Mikro Papiko; 2000, M. Lüth 2866, GZU. Peloponnese: Arcadia, Mt. Parnon range; 1995, T. Blockeel 24/109, GZU. Italy: Southern Tyrol: Dolomites, Reiterjoch; 1989, HK 15426. Montenegro: Durmitor Mts., Zabljak; 2004, priv. herb. P. Erzberger 10396. Netherlands: Brabant, Sint-Oedenrode; 2004, H. van Melick 207538, GZU. Spain: Albacete: Sierra del Calar del Mundo, Riópar; 2018, R. M. Ros, O. Werner & S. Rios, MUB 56753, GZU. Sierra del Calar del Mundo, Umbria de la Fuente de las Raigadas; 1984, M. Nieves Jiménez & R. M. Ros, MUB 1622, GZU. Riopar, Chorros del Rio Mundo; 1979, F. Alcaraz, MUB 49; dupl. in GZU. United Kingdom: England: Needlehouse Gill; 2002, priv. herb. T. Blockeel 31/258.

    Tortella commutata var. valida Köckinger & Hedenäs. Austria: Styria: Haller Mauern Mts., Grabneralm; 2019, HK 15413. Niederalpl SE Mariazell, Aschauergraben; 2019, HK 15416. Oberes Murtal, W Eppenstein; 2019, HK 15412. Oberes Murtal, SW Ruine Eppenstein; 2018, HK 15418. Oberes Murtal, W Ruine Eppenstein; 2020, HK 15414. Tyrol: Matrei in Osttirol, Kendlspitze; 2019, T. Kiebacher 2252, GZU.

    Tortella dolomitica Köckinger & Hedenäs. Austria: Carinthia: Gailtaler Alpen, Maißgraben; 2004, HK 15359. Lower Austria: Lunz, Kothbergtal; 2017, T. Barta s. n., GZU. Salzburg: Radstädter Tauern, Greschlalm; 2019, HK 15368. Styria: Haller Mauern Mts., Grabneralm; 2019, HK 15367. Hochschwab Mts., Karlgraben; 2017, HK 15364. Hochschwab Mts., Endriegelgraben; 2016, HK 15365. Hochschwab Mts., Feistringgraben; 2018, HK 15366. Hochschwab Mts., Türntal; 2019, HK 15361. Hochschwab Mts., Türnach; 2019, HK 15362, 15363. Tyrol: Stubaier Alpen, Padasterjochhaus; 2013, HK 15360.

    Tortella fleischeri (E.Bauer) J.J.Amann. Austria: Carinthia: Kreuzeckgruppe, Gerbershütte; 2004, HK 15335. Nockberge Mts., Karlbad; 2017, HK 15334. Karawanken Mts., Tscheppaschlucht; 2016, HK 15336. Lower Austria: Rax Mts., Scheibwaldhöhe; 2010, HK 15337. Salzburg: Radstädter Tauern, Zallinwand; 2015, HK 15338. Styria: Schladminger Tauern: Obere Moarhofalm SW of Schladming; 2019, HK 15333. Eisenerzer Alpen, Gfällturm; 2016, HK 15329. Eisenerzer Alpen, Reichhals; 2015, HK 15325. Eisenerzer Alpen, Reichenstein; 2015, HK 15326. Eisenerzer Alpen, Gössgraben; 2020, HK 15331. Hochschwab Mts., Griesmauerkogel; 2015, HK 15330. Hochschwab Mts., Trenchtling; 2015, HK 15328. Hochschwab Mts., Schiestlhaus; 2015, HK 15323. Hochschwab Mts., Ringkarwand; 2012, HK 15327. Hochschwab Mts., Endriegelgraben; 2016, HK 15332. Schneealpe, Lohmgraben; 2017, HK 15324. Seetaler Alpen, Köhlerhütte; 2000, HK 15322. Tyrol: Karwendel Mts., Brandenberger Tal; 1996, HK 15320. Upper Austria: Dachstein Mts., Kl. Koppenkarstein; 2010, G. Schlüsslmayr s. n., LI, GZU. Totes Gebirge, Baumschlagerreith; 2000, HK 15319. Vorarlberg: Lechquellengebirge, Lasanggatal; 2011, HK 15321. Germany: Bavaria: Berchtesgadener Alpen, Gr. Hundstod; 2003, H. Wittmann s. n., GZU. Montenegro: Durmitor Mts., Bobotov kuk; 2004, P. Erzberger 10566, GZU. Switzerland: Kt. Schwyz: Schübelbach, Rossweid; 2017, U. Graf s. n., GZU. Kt. Graubünden: Luzein, Promisain; U. Graf s. n., GZU. United Kingdom: Western Scotland: Rassal; 2017, P. Martin s. n., GZU.

    Tortella robusta (Pfeff.) Köckinger & Hedenäs. Austria: Carinthia: Grebenzen; 2017, HK 15384. Salzburg: Radstädter Tauern, Gamsleitenspitze; 2015, HK 15385. Styria: Dachstein, Tor; 2017, HK 15378. Triebener Tauern, Peilsteiner Wand; 2018, HK 15371. Triebener Tauern, Bärensulsattel; 2018, HK 15372. Seckauer Tauern, Wildpark Mautern; 2018, HK 15373. Eisenerzer Alpen, Brunnkaralm; 2018, HK 15370. Eisenerzer Alpen, Zeiritzkampel; 2018, HK 15383. Eisenerzer Alpen, Reichenstein-Nordseite; 2021, HK 15376. Eisenerzer Alpen, Reichenstein-Westgipfel; 2015, HK 15377. Hochschwab Mts., Pfaffenstein; 2015, HK 15379. Hochschwab Mts., Ochsenreithkar; 2015, HK 15380. Hochschwab Mts., Leitneralm; 2019, HK 15381. Hochschwab Mts., Graualm; 2019, HK 15382. Veitschalpe, Burg; 2015, HK 15374. Schneealpe, Lohmgraben; 2017, HK 15375. Germany: Bavaria: Berchtesgadener Alpen, Rossfeldalm; 1994, L. Meinunger 22522, GZU. Finland: Oulanka National Park, Rytisuo; 1990, HK s. n. Montenegro: Orjen Mts., between Orjen sedlo and Crkvice; 2020, P. Erzberger 12348, GZU. United Kingdom: Scotland: Srath Maolchaluim, Applecross; 2017, T. Blockeel 46/420a, GZU.

    Tortella splendida Köckinger & Hedenäs. Austria: Carinthia: Nockberge, Gregerlnock; 2018, HK 15291. Salzburg: Schladminger Tauern, Gurpitscheck; 2019, HK 15289. Radstädter Tauern, Dorferkar; 2019, HK 15290. Styria: Seckauer Alpen, Hämmerkogel; 2019, HK 15292. Eisenerzer Alpen, Grüblzinken; 2021, HK 15294. Eisenerzer Alpen, Zeiritzkampel; 2018, HK 15293. Ennstaler Alpen, Admonter Kalbling; 2017, HK 15295. Hochschwab Mts., Severinkogel; 2016, HK 15296. Hochschwab Mts., Griesmauer; 2015, HK 15297. Hochschwab Mts., Aflenzer Staritzen; 2019, HK 15298. Switzerland: Kt. Uri: Sisikon, Rossstock; 2017, M. Meier s. n., GZU. Kt. Bern: Grindelwald, Männlichen; 2018, M. Meier s. n., GZU.

    Tortella tortuosa (Hedw.) Limpr. Austria: Carinthia: Hohe Tauern, Südliches Schwarzhorn; 2000, HK 15402. Nockberge Mts., Königstuhl; 2017, HK 15403. Nockberge Mts., Rosentaler Alm; 2018, HK 15404. Friesach, Petersberg; 2017, HK 15400. Oberes Gurktal, Zedlitzdorf; 2004, HK 15401. Salzburg: Radstädter Tauern, Zallinhütte; 2015, HK 15405. Schladminger Tauern, Znachspitze; 2018, HK 15406. Lungau, Dorfer Graben; 2019, HK 15407. Styria: Schladminger Tauern, Bodensee; 2020, HK 15388. Schladminger Tauern, Keinprechthütte; 2018, HK 15394. Schladminger Tauern, Ursprungalm; 2018, HK 15390. Schladminger Tauern, Schladming; 2019, HK 15392. Triebener Tauern, Bärenkogel; 2018, HK 15396. Seckauer Tauern, Pischggraben; 2017, HK 15399. Seckauer Tauern, Maierangerkogel; 2018, HK 15397. Seckauer Tauern, Hämmerkogel; 2019, HK 15391. Neumarkt, Schloss Lind; 2020, HK 15395. Oberes Murtal, Baierdorf; 2018, HK 15389. Seetaler Alpen, Lavantsee; 2018, HK 15386. Eisenerz, Blumau; 2015, HK 15387. Hochschwab Mts., Karlgraben; 2017, HK 15398. Stubalpe, Größenberg; 1994, HK 94-1787. Grazer Bergland, Straßegg; 2019, HK 15393. Vorarlberg: Verwall Mts., Madererspitze; 2011, HK 15408. Belgium: Prov. Liége: Béverec; 1988, T. Arts 17557a, MUB, GZU. Germany: Saxony: Erzgebirge Mts., Lengefeld; 2018, S. Biedermann s. n., GZU. Greece: Drama Region: Western Rhodope Mts., Frakto Forest; 2016, T. Blockeel 45/516, GZU. Macedonia: Nidze Mts., Kali Pediada; 2010, P. Erzberger 14029, GZU. Romania: Apuseni Mts., Judetul Bihor; 2011, P. Erzberger 14747, GZU. Spain: Carche; 1980, F. Alcaraz, MUB 150, GZU. United Kingdom: England: Cornwall, Bodmin Moor; 1993, D. Holyoak 93-147, GZU. Scotland: Grampian Mts., Crianlarich; 1981, H. van Melick 212565, GZU.

    Appendix 3.

    ASAP results based on ITS. The ASAP score for column 1 was 4.5 and for column 2 and 3 it was 7.5. Results with higher scores are not shown.

    img-z34-3_01.jpg

    Appendix 4.

    ASAP results based on plastid markers. The ASAP score for column 1 was 2.5 and for column 2 it was 5.0. Results with higher scores are not shown.

    img-z35-3_01.jpg
    Heribert Köckinger and Lars Hedenäs "The supposedly well-known carbonate indicator Tortella tortuosa (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) split into eight species in Europe," Lindbergia 2023(1), (7 September 2023). https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.24903
    Accepted: 3 May 2023; Published: 7 September 2023
    KEYWORDS
    atpB-rbcL
    ITS
    morphology
    new species
    rps4
    split network
    Back to Top