Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2005 Early Carboniferous trigonoceratid nautilids from the Pitkin Formation of Arkansas, Midcontinent North America
SHUJI NIKO, ROYAL H. MAPES
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Two new species of trigonoceratid nautilids from the middle Chesterian (Early Carboniferous) Pitkin Formation of Arkansas, Midcontinent North America are described. Epistroboceras pitkinense sp. nov. is most similar to E. caneyenseNiko and Mapes, 2004, but is distinguished mainly by its dorsally shifted umbilical angle. Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov. is characterized by the narrow lg 2 (second lateral groove) in the lateral grooves, the two bilaterally symmetrical lateral ridges, and the weak nodes at intersections of ridges and the growth lines. Species previously described or assigned to Stroboceras are re-examined. Similarities in the shell morphology between the trigonoceratid nautilid Stroboceras and the isochronous Early Carboniferous ammonoid Eumorphoceras probably provide an example of synchronized convergent evolution.

Introduction

The Pitkin Formation in northern Arkansas, Mid-continent North America (middle Chesterian, late Early Carboniferous) was named by Adams (1904, p. 27) and Ulrich (1904, p. 109). This formation mostly comprises fossiliferous marine carbonates deposited in high-energy oolitic and bioclastic grain shoals along the shoreface into a southward-deepening ramp (Handford, 1986). According to the lithofacies analysis by Jehn and Young (1976), grainstones and pack-stones are dominant with minor amounts of shale, wackestone and biohermal limestone. The thickness of this formation is 15 m at the type section just north of the town of Woolsey in Washington County, Arkansas, but to the east the formation attains a thickness of more than 120 m (Easton, 1942, 1943). Saunders et al. (1977) subdivided this formation into two informal members with correlative discussions based on ammonoids. “The Lower Pitkin Member” contains a rich ammonoid assemblage, including Cravenoceras sp., Richardsonites richardsonianus, Eumorphoceras sp., Arcanoceras furnishi, Syngastrioceras sp., Metadimorphoceras aff. M. saleswheelense and Trizonoceras sp., and is assigned to the E1, upper Pendleian Stage (Saunders et al., 1977; Saunders and Work, 1999; Titus, 1999). “The Upper Pitkin Member”, known as the Eumorphoceras bisulcatum-Cravenoceras richardsonianum Zone, corresponds to the E2a, lower Arnsbergian Stage.

The purpose of this report is to describe two new species of trigonoceratid nautilids recovered from the Pitkin Formation. The fossil localities are on Lick Mountain, Newton County, Arkansas (locality 1), and road cut on the southern side of Arkansas Highway 66, approximately 1 km northeast of Leslie, Searcy County, Arkansas (locality 2 = loc. M-28 in Mapes, 1979). Localities 1 and 2 belong to the informal “Lower” and “Upper” Pitkin members, respectively. The specimens studied are housed in the Ohio University Zoological Collection (OUZC), Ohio University at Athens, Ohio.

Systematic paleontology

Family Trigonoceratidae Hyatt, 1884

Genus Epistroboceras Turner, 1954

Remarks.—See Niko and Mapes (2004, p. 341, 342) for the current status of this genus.

Epistroboceras pitkinense sp. nov.
Figures 1, 2.1–2.8, 2.10, 2.11, 3.2, 3.4

  • Stroboceras (Epistroboceras) sp., Gordon, 1964, p. 147.

  • Epistroboceras sp., Niko and Mapes, 2004, p. 341.

  • Figure 1.

    Epistroboceras pitkinense sp. nov., diagrams from cross sections of whorls in phragmocones, venter is up. 1, 2. Holotype, OUZC 5102. 3. Paratype, OUZC 5103, internal mold. Abbreviations: vg = ventral groove; v-lg = ventrolateral groove; lg 1, 2 = lateral grooves; vr = ventral ridge; v-lr = ventrolateral ridge; lr = lateral ridge; d-lr = dorsolateral ridge; af = angle on flank. Scale bar equals 5 mm.

    i1342-8144-9-3-233-f01.gif

    Figure 2.

    1–8, 10, 11. Epistroboceras pitkinense sp. nov. 1. Paratype, OUZC 5101, lateral view, ×2. 2, 3, 10, 11. Holotype, OUZC 5102. 2, lateral view, ×2; 3, partial enlargement of lateral view showing Stroboceras-like immature portion, ×5; 10, partial enlargement of ventral view showing growth lines outlining the ventral (hyponomic) sinus on the peristome, and the ventral lobe of the suture, ×10; 11, cross-sectional view, ×5. 4–8. Paratype, OUZC 5103. 4, lateral view of body chamber, ×2; 5, cross-sectional view at the last septum, ×2; 6, partial enlargement of lateral view showing growth lines outlining the lateral (ocular) sinus on the peristome, ×5; 7, ventral view of body chamber, ×2; 8, partial enlargement of lateral view showing the peristome, shell wall depression probably caused by sublethal injury, ×3. 9. Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov., holotype, OUZC 5104, partial enlargement of ventral view showing the ventral lobes of the sutures, ×5.

    i1342-8144-9-3-233-f02.gif

    Figure 3.

    1, 3, 5, 6. Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov., paratype, OUZC 5105, dorsoventral thin section. 1, ×4; 3, partial enlargement of septal neck, ×50; 5, partial enlargement of apical portion, ×14; 6, partial enlargement of initial camera, ×75. 2, 4. Epistroboceras pitkinense sp. nov., paratype, OUZC 5101, dorsoventral thin section. 2, ×4; 4, partial enlargement of septal neck, ×50.

    i1342-8144-9-3-233-f03.gif

    Diagnosis.—Species of Epistroboceras with width/height ratios of 0.75–0.83 and dorsally shifted umbilical angle in adoral whorl with umbilical zone height per whorl height ratios of 0.17–0.25; ventral platform relatively wide; ventral (hyponomic) sinus U-shaped; siphuncular position ratios (see the description for its definition) are 0.23–0.25.

    Description.—Compressed, evolute shells consisting of at least approximately two volutions with 31.4 mm in maximum observable diameter and 9.5 mm in maximum observable whorl width in holotype whose adoral termination is an incomplete body chamber; umbilicus perforate; whorls rapidly inflate during growth, thus umbilical area narrow for evolute form with ratios of umbilical area diameter per shell diameter of 0.34–0.36, and umbilical slope deeply concave; almost perfect body chamber (paratype, OUZC 5103) attains 38.2 mm in length, which represents approximately 4/9 of the last (third?) volution. Embryonic shell not preserved; juvenile whorl facing umbilical perforation and succeeding approximately 1/4 volution are Stroboceras-like with subtrapezoidal profiles; whorl sections of this Stroboceras-like portion have concave venter as ventral groove (vg), concave ventrolateral shoulders as ventrolateral grooves (v-lg), undulated flanks and subrounded dorsum; two bilaterally symmetrical lateral grooves (lg 1, 2) developed on flanks; dorsal (contact) groove present except for juvenile whorl; among these grooves, lg 1 forms widest concavity, where whorl section strongly constricted; whorl surface of this Stroboceras-like portion is ornamented by four longitudinal ridges with bilateral symmetry and distinct growth lines; ventral ridges (vr) at boundary between vg and v-lg, ventrolateral ridges (v-lr) at boundary between v-lg and lg 1, lateral ridges (lr) at boundary between lg 1 and lg 2, and dorsolateral ridges (d-lr) at boundary between lg 2 and umbilical wall. Adoral whorls shift to compressed suboctagonal in profiles with width/height ratios of 0.75–0.83; vg forms relatively wide ventral platform bordered by carinate ventrolateral angle (= vr) of 120° to 130° in internal mold; ratios of vg width per whorl width are 0.3–0.4; ventrolateral shoulders become obsolescent, and shift to concave ventral sides (v-lg) of converging flanks; angle on flank (= v-lr) obtuse, ranges from 155° to 170°; v-lg width represents approximately 1/3 of flank width; lg 1 became obsolescent; lg 2 disappeared as shell becomes flattened to weakly inflated; umbilical angle subround of about 125° to 130°, shifting to dorsum; ratios of umbilical zone height per whorl height are 0.17–0.25; umbilical wall indicates nearly linear profiles; except for vr and v-lr, surface ridges become subrounded; growth lirae also become subdued; ventral platform indicates weak inflation on internal mold. Peristome lobed, with deep U-shaped ventral (hyponomic) sinus, broad subround to subtrapezoid ventrolateral saddles, and relatively deep U-shaped lateral (ocular) sinus; dorsolateral to dorsal rim of peristome not observable. Sutures have very shallow ventral lobe, and relatively shallow but broad lateral lobes. Camerae short; there are 3 to 6 camerae in corresponding whorl height; septal curvature moderate for family. Siphuncle consists of retrochoanitic septal necks and cylindrical connecting rings; its position is near midway between the center and ventral margin; ratios of distance of central axis of siphuncle from ventral whorl surface per corresponding whorl height in dorsoventral section (siphuncular position ratio) are 0.23–0.25; ventral septal necks orthochoanitic, shift to cyrtochoanitic in dorsal ones; diameter of connecting ring is 0.33 mm at whorl height (in dorsoventral section) of 3.8 mm. Cameral and endosiphuncular deposits absent.

    Material examined.—Holotype, OUZC 5102. Para-types, OUZC 5101, 5103.

    Occurrence.—“The Upper Pitkin Member” at locality 2. The fossil-bearing exposure is a road cut on the south side of Arkansas Highway 66, approximately midway on the hill slope. The fossils are in a dense, fine-grained limestone (grainstone to packstone) about 1 meter thick. The abundant and diverse cephalopod fauna including Eumorphoceras bisulcatum and Richardsonites richardsonianus (see Mapes, 1979, locality M-28) is mixed with plant debris; surprisingly, only a cephalopod fauna is present in the limestone.

    Etymology.—The specific name is derived from the Pitkin Formation from which the new species was recovered.

    Discussion.—Epistroboceras pitkinense sp. nov. is most similar to E. caneyense Niko and Mapes (2004, p. 342, 343, fig. 1.1–1.6) from the middle Chesterian (Early Carboniferous) Caney Formation of Oklahoma, but differs by having the dorsally shifted umbilical angle in the adoral whorls, namely 0.17–0.25 in the ratios of umbilical zone height per whorl height versus approximately a ratio of 0.28 in E. caneyense. In addition, the ventral (hyponomic) sinus of E. pitkinense is less angular than that of E. caneyense.

    Genus Stroboceras Hyatt, 1884

    Type species.Gyroceras harttii [sic] Dawson (1868, p. 311, fig. 125) from Nova Scotia.

    Other included species.—Stroboceras chancharense Shimansky (1967, p. 153, 154, pl. 19, figs. 3a, b, 4a, b) from the southern Urals, S. crassum Foord (1900, p. 64, 65, pl. 20, figs. 13a–c) from Fermanagh, Ireland, S. crispum Gordon (1957, p. 28, 29, pl. 3, figs. 1–4, text-figs. 9A, B) from Alaska, S. duplicatum Schmidt (1951, p. 33, 34, pl. 4, fig. 5, text-fig. 3c; Gordon, 1964, p. 145; = Nautilus bisulcatus Koninck, 1878) from Belgium and the Harz Mountains, Germany, S. ? edwardsianum (Koninck, 1851, p. 712, pl. 60, fig. 7) from Belgium, S. furnishi Elias (1958, p. 31, pl. 3, fig. 9, text-figs. 5, 6) from Oklahoma, S. gordoni (this report), S. ? parammoneus Shimansky (1996, p. 26, 27, pl. 2, figs. 7a, b; = Stroboceras ammoneus (Eichwald, 1857) in Shimansky, 1967, 1993) from Novaya Zemlya, S. pauperum (Whitfield, 1882, p. 226; 1891, p. 595, pl. 14, fig. 23) from Ohio, S. sulcatum sulcatum (Sowerby, 1826, p. 137, pl. 571, figs. 1, 2) from Derbyshire, Great Britain, S. s. desulcatum Schmidt (1951, p. 32, pl. 4, figs. 1, 2) from Belgium and Schlesien (Silesia), Poland, S. s. multisulcatum Schmidt (1951, p. 32, 33, pl. 4, figs. 6, 7) from Dillkreis, Germany, S. triferum Schmidt (1951, p. 34, 35, pl. 4, figs. 8a, b, 9a, b, text-fig. 3d) from Schlesien (Silesia), Poland, S. ? trigonum (Winchell, 1862, p. 359) from Michigan, S. varsoviense (Weigner, 1938, p. 50, 51, pl. 3, figs. 8, 8a) from Golonoga, Poland, S. sp. from Illinois (Weller, 1916, p. 263, pl. 19, fig. 18).

    Range.—Visean to early Serpukhovian (Early Carboniferous).

    Discussion.—Schmidt (1951) assigned Nautilus (Discus) trisulcatus Meek and Worthen, 1860 to Stroboceras. Subsequently, Nautilus bicarinatus Verneuil in Murchison, Verneuil and Keyserling, 1845 was added to the genus by Shimansky (1967). However, the absence of the lateral groove even in the immature whorls and the angle on the flanks of these species suggests that they have a closer relationship with Epidomatoceras (Turner, 1954) rather than Stroboceras. Stroboceras evansi Ramsbottom and Moore, 1961 has an almost circular whorl section and six spiral (longitudinal) ridges, and its diagnosis suggests a close generic relationship to Discitoceras (Hyatt, 1884). Stroboceras mstense Shimansky, 1967 has a nearly quadrate whorl section with lateral ridges on the flanks; these characteristics are the diagnostic features of Pseudocatastroboceras (Turner, 1965). Nautilus (Trematodiscus) planidorsalis Winchell, 1862, which was refered to Stroboceras by Miller and Garner (1953), and S. intermedium Miller and Garner, 1953 are unique and do not belong in Stroboceras; these two species may represent two new genera.

    Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov.
    Figures 2.9, 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 3.6, 4, 5

  • Stroboceras cf. S. sulcatum (Sowerby). Gordon, 1964, p. 145, pl. 11, fig. 4, text-fig. 21A.

  • Figure 4.

    Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov., diagrams from cross sections of whorls, venter is up. 1, 2. Holotype, OUZC 5104. 1, internal mold, phragmocone; 2, phragmocone. 3, 5. Paratype, OUZC 5114. 3, phragmocone; 5, body chamber. 4. Paratype, OUZC 5106, phragmocone. Abbreviations are given in explanation of Figure 1, additionally: lg 3 = lateral groove, lr 1, 2 = lateral ridges. Scale bar equals 5 mm.

    i1342-8144-9-3-233-f04.gif

    Figure 5.

    Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov. 1, 8. Paratype, OUZC 5112. 1, lateral view, ×2; 8, partial enlargement of lateral view showing the apical shell morphology, ×10. 2. Paratype, OUZC 5113, lateral view, ×2. 3, 4, 9, 10. Holotype, OUZC 1504. 3, cross-sectional view, ×2; 4, lateral view, ×2; 9, partial enlargement of lateral view showing the apical shell morphology, ×10; 10, partial enlargement of dorsal view showing the apical shell morphology, ×10. 5, 6, 11, 12. Paratype, OUZC 5106. 5, cross-sectional view, ×2; 6, lateral view, ×2; 11, partial enlargement of lateral view showing growth lines outlining the ventrolateral saddle and the lateral (ocular) sinus on the peristome, and the development of nodes at intersections of ridges and growth lines, ×5; 12, partial enlargement of ventral view showing growth lines outlining the ventral sinus on the peristome, ×5.

    i1342-8144-9-3-233-f05.gif

    Diagnosis.—Species of Stroboceras with width/height ratios of 0.72–0.76 in adoral whorl, two bilaterally symmetrical lateral ridges, and weak nodes at intersections of ridges and growth lines; lg 2 (second lateral groove; see the description for its detailed definition) narrow; ventrolateral saddles in peristome have very shallow bilobate rim; a siphuncular position ratio of approximately 0.23.

    Description.—Compressed, evolute shells; the largest specimen (paratype, OUZC 5106) has at least approximately 2 1/6 volutions with 37.8 mm in maximum observable diameter (ventral region partly missing) whose adoral approximately 1/2 volution is an incomplete body chamber; holotype is an incomplete phragmocone of 34.8 mm in maximum observable diameter and 10.9 mm in maximum observable whorl width, consisting approximately of 2 volutions; gyroceraconic stages are not observable in all examined specimens; umbilicus perforate with 3.8–4.4 mm and 5.1–5.3 mm in short and long diameters of umbilical perforation; whorls rapidly inflate during growth, thus umbilical area narrow for evolute form with ratios of umbilical area diameter per shell diameter of 0.33–0.34, and umbilical slope deeply concave. Embryonic shell cone-shaped with smooth apex; initial camera shallow, asymmetrical, 0.96 mm in maximum diameter and 0.71 mm in maximum length; early juvenile whorl, representing the first approximately 1/2 volution, has accentuated surface lirae; whorl sections laterally compressed subtrapezoidal with width/height ratios of 0.87–0.91 in juvenile, then decreasing to 0.72–0.76 in adoral whorls, indented, having concave venter with ventral groove (vg), concave ventrolateral shoulders with ventrolateral grooves (v-lg), roughly converging flanks and subrounded dorsum; three bilaterally symmetrical lateral (lg 1, 2, 3) grooves developed on flanks; dorsal (contact) groove present except for juvenile whorl; among these grooves, lg 1 forms widest concavity, where whorl section strongly constricted; lg 2 is very narrow, representing approximately 1/4–1/3 of lg 3 width; shell surface ornamented by five longitudinal ridges with bilateral symmetry and distinct growth lines; strongly prominent ventral ridges (vr) at boundary between vg and v-lg, strongly prominent ventrolateral ridges (v-lr) at boundary between v-lg and lg 1, two weakly developed lateral ridges (lr 1, 2) between lg 1 and lg 2 (lr 1) and lg 2 and lg 3 (lr 2), and relatively weak dorsoventral ridges (d-lr) at boundary between lg 3 and umbilical wall; intersections of ridges and growth lines periodically form weak nodes; vg forms relatively wide ventral platform bordered by vr with ventrolateral angle of 115° to 145° in internal mold; ratio of vg width per whorl width is approximately 0.35; angles of ventrolateral shoulders (= v-lr) 95° to 125°; umbilical angle (= d-lr) subangular except for juvenile whorl with 110° to 130°; all grooves and ridges are not obsolescent even in adoral whorls. Growth lines indicate the lobed peristome shape that is characterized by deep U- to V-shaped ventral (hyponomic) sinus, broad subtrapezoidal ventrolateral saddles with very shallowly bilobate rim, relatively deep U-shaped lateral (ocular) sinus, and nearly transverse dorsolateral apertural rim; dorsal rim of peristome not observable. Sutures with very shallow ventral lobe and relatively shallow but broad lateral lobes. Camerae short; there are 3 to 7 camerae in corresponding whorl height; 28 camerae occur in the last-preserved (second?) volution of paratype (OUZC 5105); septal curvature moderate for family. Siphuncle consists of retrochoanitic septal necks and cylindrical connecting rings; its position is near midway between the center and ventral margin; ratio of minimum distance of central axis of septal foramen from whorl surface per corresponding whorl height in dorsoventral section (siphuncular position ratio) is approximately 0.23; ventral septal necks orthochoanitic, shift to cyrtochoanitic in dorsal ones; diameter of connecting ring is 0.59 mm at whorl height (in dorsoventral section) of 6.2 mm; caecum weakly inflated, attached to bottom of initial camera. Cameral and endosiphuncular deposits absent.

    Material examined.—Holotype, OUZC 5104. Para-types, OUZC 5105, 5106, 5112–5115, 5120. In addition, nine specimens of the fragmentary shells, OUZC 5107–5111, 5116–5119, are assigned to Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov.

    Occurrence.—Limestone (oolitic grainstone) of “the Lower Pitkin Member” at locality 1 (OUZC 5104–5115). “The Upper Pitkin Member” at locality 2 (OUZC 5116–5120).

    Etymology.—The specific name honors the late Dr. Mackenzie Gordon, Jr., who was the first to illustrate this species as indicated in the synonymy.

    Discussion.—Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov. can be distinguished from the morphologically nearest species, S. sulcatum sulcatum and S. s. desulcatum, in that S. gordoni possesses narrower lg 2 (lg 2 width/lg 3 width = approximately 1/4–1/3 in S. gordoni versus nearly 1 in the latter two species) and weak nodes at intersections of the ridges and the growth lines. In the width/height ratios of the whorl, this new species also resembles S. duplicatum, but the latter has three lateral ridges with bilateral symmetry.

    The indented whorl sections with the ventral platform bordered by prominent ventrolateral ridges and the distinct growth lines of Stroboceras are also characteristic of the juvenile growth stages of the girtyoceratid ammonoid genus Eumorphoceras (Girty, 1909) of Early Carboniferous age, especially in the Chesterian species E. richardsoni McCaleb, Quinn and Furnish (1964, p. 24, 25, pl. 3, figs. 5, 6) and E. rostratum Yates (1962, p. 387, 388, pl. 55, figs. 1–4). It is possible that the surface nodes of S. gordoni are analogous to the lateral ribs observed in the juvenile growth stages of Eumorphoceras. These similarities in shell ornament between the nautilids described herein and the ammonoid Eumorphoceras, which cooccurs with the nautilids at both localities, is a case of synchronized convergent evolution.

    Acknowledgments

    An earlier draft of the manuscript benefited from reviews by Masayuki Ehiro and C. H. Holland.

    References

    1.

    G. I. Adams 1904. Zinc and lead deposits of northern Arkansas. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 24 p. 1–89. pls. 1–27. Google Scholar

    2.

    J. W. Dawson 1868. Acadian Geology. The Geological Structure, Organic Remains, and Mineral Resources of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island 694. p., 10 pls. Macmillan and Co. London. Google Scholar

    3.

    W. H. Easton 1942. Pitkin Limestone of northern Arkansas. Arkansas Geological Survey, Bulletin 8 p. 1–115. pls. 1–12. Google Scholar

    4.

    W. H. Easton 1943. The fauna of the Pitkin Formation of Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology vol. 17:p. 125–154. pls. 21–24. Google Scholar

    5.

    E. Eichwald 1857. Beitrag zur geographischen Verbreitung der fossilen Thiere Russlands. Alte Periode. Bulletin de la SociétéImpériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, vol. 30 p. 192–212. Google Scholar

    6.

    M. K. Elias 1958. Late Mississippian fauna from the Redoak Hollow Formation of southern Oklahoma. Pt. 4: Gastropoda, Scaphopoda, Cephalopoda, Ostracoda, Thoracica, and Problematica. Journal of Paleontology vol. 32:p. 1–57. pls. 1–4. Google Scholar

    7.

    A. H. Foord 1900. Monograph of the Carboniferous Cephalopoda of Ireland. Part 3. Monograph of the Palaeontological Society, London p. 49–126. pls. 18–32. Google Scholar

    8.

    G. H. Girty 1909. Fauna of the Caney Shale of Oklahoma. United States Geological Survey, Bulletin 377 p. 1–106. pls. 1–13. Google Scholar

    9.

    M. Gordon Jr. 1957. Mississippian cephalopods of northern and eastern Alaska. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 283 p. 1–61. pls. 1–6. Google Scholar

    10.

    M. Gordon Jr. 1964. Carboniferous cephalopods of Arkansas. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 460 p. 1–322. pls. 1–30. Google Scholar

    11.

    C. R. Handford 1986. Facies and bedding sequences in shelf-storm-deposited carbonates—Fayetteville Shale and Pitkin Limestone (Mississippian), Arkansas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology vol. 56:p. 123–137. Google Scholar

    12.

    A. Hyatt 1883–1884. Genera of fossil cephalopods. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History vol. 22:p. 253–338. Google Scholar

    13.

    P. J. Jehn and L. M. Young . 1976. Depositional environments of the Pitkin Formation, northern Arkansas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology vol. 46:p. 377–386. Google Scholar

    14.

    L. G de Konink 1851. Description des Animaux Fossils quie se Trouvent dans le Terrain Carbonifére de Belgique. Supplement p. 651–716. pls. 56–60. H. Dessain. Liége. (not seen). Google Scholar

    15.

    L. G de Konink 1878. Faune du calcaiure Carbonifére de la Belgique. Premiére partie. Annales du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique vol. 2:p. 1–152. pls. 1–31. Google Scholar

    16.

    R. H. Mapes 1979. Carboniferous and Permian Bactritoidea (Cephalopoda) in North America. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article 64 p. 1–75. pls. 1–41. Google Scholar

    17.

    J. A. McCaleb, J. H. Quinn, and W. M. Furnish . 1964. Girtyoceratidae in the southern Midcontinent. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Circular 67 p. 1–41. pls. 1–4. Google Scholar

    18.

    F. B. Meek and A. H. Worthen . 1860. Descriptions of new Carboniferous fossils from Illinois and other western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 1860:p. 447–472. Google Scholar

    19.

    A. K. Miller and H. F. Garner . 1953. Lower Mississippian cephalopods of Michigan. Part II. Coiled nautiloids. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan vol. 11:p. 111–151. pls. 1–4. Google Scholar

    20.

    R. I. Murchison, Éde Verneuil, and Ade Keyserling . 1845. Géologie de la Russie d'Europe et des Montagnes de l'Oural. Volume 2. Partie 3. Paléontologie 512. p. J. Murray, Londres and Bertrand. Paris. Google Scholar

    21.

    S. Niko and R. H. Mapes . 2004. A new Early Carboniferous nautilid from the Caney Formation of Oklahoma, Central North America. Paleontological Research vol. 8:p. 341–344. Google Scholar

    22.

    W. H C. Ramsbottom and E. W J. Moore . 1961. Coiled nautiloids from the Viséan of Ireland. Liverpool and Manchester Geological Journal vol. 2:p. 630–644. pls. 27–30. Google Scholar

    23.

    W. B. Saunders, W. L. Manger, and M. Gordon Jr. . 1977. Upper Mississippian and Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian ammonoid biostratigraphy of northern Arkansas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 18 p. 117–137. Google Scholar

    24.

    W. B. Saunders and D. M. Work . 1999. The Cravenoceras-Glaphyrites dilemma: ammonoid sutures vs. shell shape in the mid-Carboniferous. In A. Yu Rozanov and A. A. Shevyrev , editors. eds. Iskopaemiye Tsefalopodiy: Noveishie Dostizheniya v Ikh Izuchenii (Fossil Cephalopods: Recent Advances in Their Study) p. 125–137.Rossiiskaya Akademiya Nauk, Palaeontologicheskii Institut. Moscow. Google Scholar

    25.

    H. Schmidt 1951. Nautiliden aus deutschem Unterkarbon. Paläontologische Zeitschrift vol. 24:p. 23–57. pls. 4–7. Google Scholar

    26.

    V. N. Shimansky 1967. Kamennougolniye Nautilida (Carboniferous Nautilida). Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta vol. 115:p. 1–258. pls. 1–30. (in Russian). Google Scholar

    27.

    V. N. Shimansky 1993. Noviye rannekamennougolniye trig-onotseratidiy (Nautiloidea) Novoi Zemli (New Early Carboniferous trigonoceratids (Nautiloidea) from Novaya Zemlya). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 1993:no. 1p. 17–24. pls. 3, 4. (in Russian with English abstract). Google Scholar

    28.

    V. N. Shimansky 1996. Kamennougolniye neammonoidniye golovonogiye mollyuski Novoi Zemli (Carboniferous non-ammonoid cephalopods of Novaya Zemlya). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 1996:no. 4p. 24–29. pl. 2. (in Russian with English abstract). Google Scholar

    29.

    Jde C. Sowerby 1826–1829. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of Those Remains of Testaceous Animals or Shells, Which Have Been Preserved at Various Times and Depths in the Earth. Volume 6 609. p. B. Meredith. London. Google Scholar

    30.

    A. L. Titus 1999. Ammonoid biostratigraphy of the Barnett Shale (Late Mississippian), Texas, USA. In A. Yu Rozanov and A. A. Shevyrev , editors. eds. Iskopaemiye Tsefalopodiy: Noveishie Dostizheniya v Ikh Izuchenii (Fossil Cephalopods: Recent Advances in Their Study) p. 155–168.Rossiiskaya Akademiya Nauk, Palaeontologicheskii Institut. Moscow. Google Scholar

    31.

    J. S. Turner 1954. On the Carboniferous nautiloids: some Middle Viséan species from the Isle of Man. Liverpool and Manchester Geological Journal vol. 1:p. 298–325. pls. 20–25. Google Scholar

    32.

    J. S. Turner 1965. On the Carboniferous nautiloids: Nautilus quadratus Fleming and certain other coiled nautiloids. Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society Scientific Section vol. 9:p. 223–256. pls. 1–5. Google Scholar

    33.

    E. O. Ulrich 1904. Determination and correlation of formations [of northern Arkansas]. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 24 p. 90–113. Google Scholar

    34.

    S. Weller 1916. Description of a Ste. Genevieve Limestone fauna from Monroe County, Illinois. The University of Chicago, Walker Museum, Contribution 1 p. 243–264. pls. 16–19. Google Scholar

    35.

    S. Weigner 1938. Fauna piaskowców z Golonoga. Bulletin du Service Géologique de Pologne vol. 9:p. 2–79. pls. 1–3. Google Scholar

    36.

    R. P. Whitfield 1882. Descriptions of new species of fossils from Ohio, with remarks on some of the geological formations in which they occur. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences vol. 2:p. 193–244. Google Scholar

    37.

    R. P. Whitfield 1891. Contributions to invertebrate palaeontology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences vol. 5:p. 505–620. pls. 5–16. Google Scholar

    38.

    A. Winchell 1862. Notice of the rocks lying between the Carboniferous limestone of the Lower Peninsula of Michigan and the limestones of the Hamilton Group: with descriptions of some cephalopods supposed to be new to science. American Journal of Science and Arts vol. 33:p. 352–366. Google Scholar

    39.

    P. J. Yates 1962. The palaeontology of the Namurian rocks of Slieve Anierin, Co. Leitrim, Eire. Palaeontology vol. 5:p. 355–443. pls. 51–62. Google Scholar
    SHUJI NIKO and ROYAL H. MAPES "Early Carboniferous trigonoceratid nautilids from the Pitkin Formation of Arkansas, Midcontinent North America," Paleontological Research 9(3), 233-241, (1 September 2005). https://doi.org/10.2517/prpsj.9.233
    Received: 15 April 2005; Accepted: 20 June 2005; Published: 1 September 2005
    KEYWORDS
    Arkansas
    Epistroboceras pitkinense sp. nov
    middle Chesterian (early Carboniferous)
    Pitkin Formation
    Stroboceras gordoni sp. nov
    trigonoceratid nautilids
    Back to Top