BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
30 April 2024 From a volcanic area on the Kamchatka peninsula (Northeast Asia) to a rock glacier in the Swiss Alps: a new record of Aspilota umbrosa Belokobylskij, 2007 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae)
Francisco Javier Peris-Felipo, José D. Gilgado, Sergey A. Belokobylskij, Bruno Baur
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The species Aspilota umbrosa Belokobylskij, 2007 is recorded for the first time in Europe. The first photographs of this species, both of the holotype and of the new record, the second in the world, are provided. The holotype was found near the Klyuchevskaya Sopka volcano (Kamchatka peninsula, Russia). The new specimen of this species was collected in a superficial subterranean habitat (the MSS – Milieu Souterrain Superficiel) in the rock glacier in Val Sassa (Swiss National Park, Grisons, Switzerland) by a subterranean trap in 2020. This is the first record of A. umbrosa in the MSS of the Swiss Alps and in a rock glacier. A key to the known Swiss species of Aspilota is provided.

INTRODUCTION

Superficial subterranean habitats have received increasing attention in recent decades (Culver & Pipan, 2014). The most researched of them is the “Milieu Souterrain Superficiel”, widely known as MSS (Mammola et al., 2016). This habitat comprises the network of voids between stony debris that lies beneath the surface. MSSs have different origins (colluvial, volcanic or alluvial) and different properties (among others, size of the stones, voids, and presence of soil layers) (Ortuño et al., 2013). MSSs are inhabited by species with different ecological requirements (epigean, edaphobionts, and troglobionts, among others) (e.g., Nitzu et al., 2014; Jiménez-Valverde et al., 2015; Mammola et al., 2016). Recently, new and rarely captured species have been frequently discovered in MSSs (e.g., Baquero et al., 2017; Gilgado et al., 2017; Ledesma et al., 2019; Jordana et al., 2020), allowing for a deeper understanding of the ecology of soil and subsoil habitats (Rendoš et al., 2012, 2016; Nitzu et al., 2014; Nae & Băncilă, 2017; Ledesma et al., 2020; Nae et al., 2021). MSS-research began in the Pyrenees (Juberthie et al., 1980, 1981) and has been largely conducted in Europe (Mammola et al., 2016). Some entomological faunistic records in MSSs of the Alps have been documented (Vailati, 1990; Christian et al., 1996; Růžička & Thaler, 2002; Zacharda & Kučera, 2006; Christian & Spötl, 2010), but there is no information on such habitats in Switzerland. Moreover, MSSs have never been sampled in rock glaciers.

Rock glaciers are defined as “lobate or tongue-shaped bodies of perennially frozen unconsolidated material supersaturated with interstitial ice and ice lenses that move downslope or downvalley by creep” (Haeberli, 1985). These landscape features are not uncommon in the Alps and other high mountains in temperate zones (Clark et al., 1998). Rock glaciers are formed by several processes (Clark et al., 1998), and the percentage of ice or permafrost in them is variable (Barsch, 1996). Rock glaciers have been studied from a biological perspective, including their plant and animal communities, and their role as climatic refugia (e.g., Cannone & Gerdol, 2003; Millar et al., 2015; Tampucci et al., 2017; Gobbi et al., 2020; Cannone & Piccinelli, 2021). So far, however, there have been no studies on the subterranean fauna of rock glaciers. We have collected hundreds of different specimens in a series of sampling efforts in the superficial subterranean environment of a rock glacier in the Swiss National Park. Among them, a parasitoid species the genus Aspilota Foerster, 1863 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) was identified.

The genus Aspilota is one of the most species-rich taxa of the Alysiinae with approximately 250 species described from almost all zoogeographical regions. Aspilota species are parasitoids of flies (Diptera), mainly of the families Phoridae and Drosophilidae; other families listed (Anthomyiidae, Lonchaeidae, Muscidae, Platypezidae, Sarcophagidae, Syrphidae and Tephritidae) (Yu et al., 2016) may have been erroneously included and need to be confirmed. This genus is well defined by the presence of large paraclypeal fovea, almost connected to the inner margin of the eye, and the presence of fore wing vein cuqu1 (2-SR) (van Achterberg, 1988; Peris-Felipo & Belokobylskij, 2016a).

In this study, we provide the first record of the Far Eastern species Aspilota umbrosa Belokobylskij, 2007 in Europe. We also present the first photographs of the species, and a key to identifying the eight known species of Aspilota from Switzerland.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sampling was carried at the rock glacier in Val Sassa, and the surrounding scree habitats, in the Swiss National Park (SNP) in the Eastern Alps, Grisons, Switzerland (46°39'N, 10°12' E)(Fig. 1). The SNP is a strict nature reserve (category Ia; IUCN/WCMC, 1994), with no habitat and wildlife management. Public access to the SNP is only permitted on marked paths during the summer months (Baur & Scheurer, 2014). The upper layer of this rock glacier consists mainly of dolomite rock and sediments (Trümpy et al., 1997). The lower end of the rock glacier is at an elevation of 2100 m, while its higher part reaches up to 2600 m.

We installed eight subterranean sampling devices (SSD) on 24.07.2019: four in a line on the surface of the rock glacier, two in its foreland and two in the lateral screes. The SSDs were modified from the design of previous research (López & Oromí, 2010; Mammola et al., 2016; Baquero et al., 2017) (Fig. 1). A SSD consisted of a 1 m long PVC tube, 11 cm in diameter, buried vertically in the ground with the upper end at surface level. The tubes had several lateral perforations (each 8 mm in diameter) below the first 40 cm, allowing invertebrates to enter the interior of the tube. A pitfall trap containing propylene glycol was placed at the bottom of each tube. The pitfall traps were recovered by means of a metal rod attached to it and emptied. This happened after two months (25.09.2019), 12 months (28.07.2020), and 14 months (23.09.2020). The captured animals were transported to the University of Basel, where they were sorted in the lab using a stereomicroscope.

The terminology of the morphological features, sculpture, and measurements, as well as the wing venation nomenclature followed Peris-Felipo et al. (2014), and in parenthesis van Achterberg (1993). To identify the Aspilota specimen we used the keys of Fischer (1976, 1978), Belokobylskij & Tobias (2007), and Papp (2008). The material was imaged using Digital Microscope Keyence® VHX-2000 and Adobe Photoshop® imaging system. The specimen is kept in the collection of the Bündner Naturmuseum Chur (BNM), Switzerland, in accordance with the guidelines of the Swiss National Park. The holotype of Aspilota umbrosa deposited in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg, Russia (ZISP) was also studied and photographed.

TAXONOMIC PART

Order Hymenoptera Linnaeus, 1758
Family Braconidae Nees, 1811
Subfamily Alysiinae Leach, 1815
Genus Aspilota Foerster, 1863
Aspilota umbrosa Belokobylskij, 2007
Figs 2-4

  • Type material: Holotype (Fig. 4): female; Russia, Kamchatka, Kozyrevsk, mixed forest; 24.07.1985; collected near the active volcano Klyuchevskaya Sopka; S. Belokobylskij leg. (ZISP).

  • Material collected: BNM; 1 female; Switzerland, Grisons, rock glacier in Val Sassa, Swiss National Park, 46°37'44”N 10°6'44”E, 2250 m; 23.09.2020; collected by subterranean sampling devices (SSD); J. D. Gilgado leg. (Figs 2-3).

  • Main characters of the species (Swiss specimen): Body length 2.0 mm. Head in dorsal view 1.8 times as wide as its median length and 1.4 times as wide as mesoscutum. Face 1.8 times as wide as high. Mandible 1.3 times as long as wide. Lower tooth wider than upper tooth. Antenna 18-segmented. First flagellar segment 5.2 times as long as its apical width. Sixth flagellar segment almost twice as long as its width. Mesosoma in lateral view 1.2 times as long as high. Mesoscutum 0.8 time as long as its maximum width. Notauli mostly absent. Dorsal mesoscutal pit absent. Prescutellar depression smooth, with medial and two lateral carinae. Precoxal sulcus present, crenulate, not reaching anterior and posterior margins of mesopleuron. Upper part of posterior mesopleural furrow crenulated, while the lower part is smooth. Propodeum with pentagonal areola delineated by distinct carinae. Propodeal spiracles small. Hind femur 4.4 times as long as its maximum width. First metasomal tergite twice as long as its apical width, striate. Ovipositor 1.5 times as long as first tergite, shorter than metasoma, as long as hind femur. Body, antenna, and pterostigma dark brown, mandibles and legs brown. Male. Unknown.

  • Variation with holotype: Face 1.5 times as wide as high (1.8 times in the Swiss specimen). Antenna 17-segmented (18-segmented in the Swiss specimen). First flagellar segment 4.0 times as long as its apical width (4.4 times in the Swiss specimen). Body, antenna, and pterostigma brown (dark brown in the Swiss specimen). Mandible and legs yellowish brown (brown in the Swiss specimen). Otherwise, characters are similar.

  • Fig. 1.

    (A) Location of the sampling site on the rock glacier in Val Sassa in the Swiss National Park. (B) Surface of the rock glacier at the sampling site. (C) Subterranean Sampling Device (SSD) just before burying it. (D) Installation of the pitfall trap in the tube once it was buried.

    img-z3-1_121.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    Aspilota umbrosa Belokobylskij, 2007 (female, Swiss specimen). (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head and mesosoma, lateral view. (C) Mandible. (D) Antenna. (E) Head, front view. (F) Head, dorsal view.

    img-z4-1_121.jpg

    Key to the known Swiss species of Aspilota

    1 Vein 2-SR of fore wing absent. First flagellar segment 1.2 times as long as its maximum width. Upper tooth wider than lower tooth. First metasomal tergite 2.0 times as long as its maximum width. Body length 1.6-1.8 mm. Austria, Bulgaria, China, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Russia (Far East), Sweden, Switzerland A. (Eusynaldis) parvicornis (Thomson)

    – Vein 2-SR of fore wing present. First flagellar segment 3.0-5.2 times as long as its maximum width. Lower tooth wider than upper tooth 2

    2(1) Propodeum with rather large areola, distinctly delineated by carinae. First metasoma tergite 2.0-2.5 times as long as its apical width 3

    – Propodeum without areola, distinctly sculptured. First metasoma tergite 1.6-1.8 times as long as its apical width 6

    – Precoxal sulcus reaching anterior margin of mesopleuron 5

    4(3) First flagellar segment 4.5 times as long as its maximum width. Head in dorsal view 1.7 times as wide as mesoscutum. Hind femur 4.0 times as long as its maximum width. First metasomal tergite 2.3 times as long as its apical width. First metasomal tergite lighter than second and third tergites. Ovipositor as long as first tergite. Body length 1.8 mm. Austria, former Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Faeroe Islands, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland A. (Aspilota) hirticornis Thomson

    – First flagellar segment 5.2 times as long as its maximum width. Head in dorsal view 1.4 times as wide as mesoscutum. Hind femur 4.4 times as long as its maximum width. First metasomal tergite 2.0 times as long as its apical width. First metasomal tergite similar in colour to second and third tergites. Ovipositor 1.5 times as long as first metasomal tergite. Body length 2.0 mm. Russia (Far East), Switzerland A. (Aspilota) umbrosa Belokobylskij

    5(4) First metasomal tergite similar in colour to second and third tergites. First flagellar segment 5.5 times as long as its maximum width. Hind femur 5.0 times as long as its maximum width. Ovipositor 1.5 times as long as first metasomal tergite. Body length 1.9 mm. Austria, Hungary, Korea, Spain, Switzerland A. (Aspilota) flagellaris Fischer

    – First metasomal tergite paler than second and third tergites. First flagellar segment 5.0 times as long as its maximum width. Hind femur 4.5 times as long as its maximum width. Ovipositor as long as first metasomal tergite. Body length 2.2 mm. Austria, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Denmark, Hungary, Switzerland .. A. (Aspilota) furtnerana Fischer

    6(2) Precoxal sulcus not reaching anterior margin of mesopleuron. First flagellar segment 4.5 times as long as its maximum width. Body length 2.7-3.2 mm. Austria, former Czechoslovakia, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland A. (Aspilota) efoveolata (Thomson)

    – Precoxal sulcus reaching anterior margin or anterior and posterior margins of mesopleuron. First flagellar segment 3.0 times as long as its maximum width 7

    7(6) Precoxal sulcus reaching anterior margin of mesopleuron. Hind femur 4.0 times as long as its maximum width. Face 1.9 times as high as long. Head in dorsal view 1.4 times as wide as its length. Ovipositor shorter than first metasomal tergite. Body length 2.5-3.0 mm. Austria, Belgium, Croatia, former Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Montenegro, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom A. (Aspilota) ruficornis (Nees)

    – Precoxal sulcus reaching anterior and posterior margins of mesopleuron. Hind femur 3.5 times as long as its maximum width. Face 1.5-1.6 times as high as long. Head in dorsal view 1.25 times as wide as its length. Ovipositor 1.3 times as long as first metasomal tergite. Body length 1.6 mm. Austria, Hungary, Israel, Switzerland A. (Aspilota) latitemporata Fischer

    DISCUSSION

    In our project we collected some parasitoid wasps in the subterranean traps. However, Aspilota umbrosa in our samples was a surprising finding for several reasons. Firstly, its disjunct distribution as the only known individual of this species to date has been found near the Klyuchevskaya Sopka volcano (Kamchatka, Russia), which is some 8600 km from Val Sassa in the Swiss National Park. It is possible that the species has a wide distribution, with many undiscovered populations between these locations. Alternatively, it is conceivable that the alpine population of A. umbrosa is a relict of past ice ages, remaining isolated from the north-eastern population (Schmitt et al., 2010). Furthermore, the alpine population could be a result of a modern dispersal event (Schmitt et al., 2010). Interestingly, the habitat at the type location is mixed forest, a completely different habitat than that of our record. However, the landscapes of both regions share some characteristics, such as mountain reliefs and snowfields. The currently known distribution of Aspilota umbrosa suggests that it is a boreo-alpine species.

    Fig. 3.

    Aspilota umbrosa Belokobylskij, 2007 (female, Swiss specimen). (A) Propodeum and first metasomal tergite, dorsal view. (B) Hind leg, metasoma and ovipositor, lateral view. (C) Fore and hind wings.

    img-z6-3_121.jpg

    The identification of the captured specimen with the keys of Fischer (1976, 1978), Belokobylskij & Tobias (2007), and Papp (2008) led us to Aspilota umbrosa, but the significant geographical separation between the two locations made us consider that our specimen could belong to a closely related new species. However, further examination of their morphology showed only subtle differences between our specimen and the holotype of Aspilota umbrosa, consistent with a distance of 8600 km between collection sites, and not enough to justify the establishment of a new species. Moreover, minimal morphological differences are known to occur in other insects with boreo-alpine distributions (Paill et al., 2021). We contemplated the possibility of conducting a barcoding analysis as an additional source of information, but none of the authors involved had the possibility to perform it in the recently captured specimen, or the holotype of Aspilota umbrosa stored in Russia. In addition, we also considered that even if they belonged to the same species, the large distance between the two collecting sites would most surely show in the barcoding analysis, possibly not providing a conclusive result. On the other hand, even large differences in barcode sequences are not enough to justify species descriptions by themselves (Zamani et al., 2022). Thus, we consider that the morphological study is for the time being enough evidence to consider the identity of the newly captured specimen as Aspilota umbrosa, and the observed minor differences are consistent with a boreo-alpine distribution and a distance among collecting sites of 8600 km.

    Another interesting feature of the present record is the microhabitat in which Aspilota umbrosa was found. This is not the first record of a braconid wasp in the subterranean realm (Peris-Felipo & Belokobylskij, 2016b), and specimens of the genus Aspilota have also been trapped in caves (Peris-Felipo et al., 2016). However, our record is the first of a braconid parasitoid in the MSS. At the same time, our finding is the first published record of an arthropod species inhabiting the scree layer (MSS) of a rock glacier in the Swiss Alps. The MSS acts as a shelter, reducing the diurnal and seasonal fluctuations in temperature and humidity at the surface (Jiménez-Valverde et al., 2015; Mammola et al., 2016; Ledesma et al., 2020). This can help preserve populations of high mountain species that are otherwise rare on the surface (e.g., Gilgado et al., 2014, 2015; Ledesma et al., 2019; Ortuño et al., 2019). Some of these species may be glacial relicts (Růžička et al., 2012), as could be the case with Aspilota umbrosa. This type of MSS on a rock glacier with permafrost underneath can sustain particularly cold temperatures in summer. It is worth noting that the SSDs only collected individuals below the first 40 cm of the scree layer to prevent accidental capture of epigean species. It is likely that A. umbrosa or its hosts use the MSS during at least a part of their life cycle. Further samplings can strengthen this idea. Finally, we do not have enough information to assess the conservation status of Aspilota umbrosa. However, the Alps are currently being affected by global warming, leading to melting glaciers, and changing the distribution ranges of many species, including arthropods (Vitasse et al., 2021; Gilgado et al., 2022a, b). Thus, the alpine population of A. umbrosa may be also affected.

    Fig. 4.

    Aspilota umbrosa Belokobylskij, 2007 (female, holotype). (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head and mesosoma, lateral view. (C) Antenna. (D) Head, front view. (E) Propodeum and first metasomal tergite, dorsal view. (F) Hind leg, metasoma and ovipositor, lateral view.

    img-z7-1_121.jpg

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The SNP direction granted permission for fieldwork in the SNP and provided logistical support. Funding was provided by the SNP Research Commission. We thank Sonja Wipf, Christian Rossi, Samuel Wiesmann, Seraina Campell Andri and Stania Bunte (all staff members of SNP) for advice and help during fieldwork. We thank the staff of the Chamanna Cluozza for the accommodation during fieldwork. We are thankful to Alejandro Criado, Ignacio Gilgado, Luca Yapura, Noah Meier, Sophie Fröhlicher, José Muñoz and Sandro Meyer for assistance during fieldwork, and Etienne Cudré-Mauroux, Evelin Pandiamakkal and Luca Yapura for sorting the arthropods sampled in the traps, and to Noah Meier for sorting the wasps by families. We also want to thank especially Miriam Conti and Matthias Borer (Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Switzerland) for their kindness and help during our work with the photosystem in the Museum. We are also thankful to Ueli Rehsteiner and Stephan Liersch (Bündner Naturmusem Chur) for their help with preparing the specimen for the collection. Additional funding was obtained from the ‘Stiftung Sammlung Naturmuseum Chur’. SAB was also funded in part by State Research Project No 122031100272-3.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (see  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Achterberg C. van. 1988. The genera of the Aspilota-group and some descriptions of fungicolous Alysiini from Netherlands (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae). Zoologische Verhandelingen Leiden 247: 1–88. Google Scholar

    2.

    Achterberg C. van. 1993. Illustrated key to the subfamilies of the Braconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea). Zoologische Verhandelingen Leiden 283: 1–189. Google Scholar

    3.

    Baquero E., Ledesma E., Gilgado J.D., Ortuño V.M., Jordana R. 2017. Distinctive Collembola communities in the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum: First data for the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Central Spain) and a description of two new species of Orchesella (Entomobryidae). PLoS One 12(12): e0189205. Google Scholar

    4.

    Barsch D. 1996. Welche geoökologischen und klimatischen Aussagen erlauben aktive, inaktive und fossile Blockgletscher. heidelberger Geographische Arbeiten 100: 32–39. Google Scholar

    5.

    Baur B., Scheurer T. (eds). 2014. Wissen schaffen – 100 Jahre Forschung im Schweizerischen Nationalpark. Nationalpark-Forschung in der Schweiz 100/I. haupt Verlag , Bern , 391 pp. Google Scholar

    6.

    Belokobylskij S.A., Tobias V.I. 2007. Fam. Braconidae. Subfam. Alysiinae. Group of genera close to Aspilota (pp. 9–133). In: Lelej A.S. (ed.). Key to insects of the Russian Far East. Neuropteroidea, Mecoptera, Hymenoptera. Vladivostok. Dal'nauka 4(5). Google Scholar

    7.

    Cannone N., Gerdol R. 2003. Vegetation as an ecological indicator ofsurface instability in rock glaciers. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 35(3): 384–390. Google Scholar

    8.

    Cannone N., Piccinelli S. 2021. Changes of rock glacier vegetation in 25 years of climate warming in the Italian Alps. Catena 206: 105562. Google Scholar

    9.

    Christian E., Spötl C. 2010. Karst geology and cave fauna of Austria: a concise review. International Journal of Speleology 39(2): 71–90. Google Scholar

    10.

    Christian E., Graf W., Moog O. 1996. Plusiocampa caprai – Ein “Höhlentier” in den Kärntner Zentralalpen. Carinthia II 186/106: 387–392. Google Scholar

    11.

    Clark D.H., Steig E.J., Potter Jr. N., Gillespie, A.R. 1998. Genetic variability of rock glaciers. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography 80(3/4): 175–182. Google Scholar

    12.

    Culver D.C., Pipan, T. 2014. Shallow subterranean habitats: ecology, evolution, and conservation. Oxford University Press , USA , 258 pp. Google Scholar

    13.

    Fischer M. 1976. Erste Nachweise von Aspilota-Wespen in Burgenland (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae). Annalen des Naturhistorisches Museum Wien 80: 343–410. Google Scholar

    14.

    Fischer M. 1978. Neue Alysiinen von Neu Guinea, Neu Britannien und den Philippinen (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae). Annalen des Naturhistorisches Museum Wien 81: 479–497. Google Scholar

    15.

    Gilgado J.D., Ledesma E., Cuesta E., Arrechea E., Zapata de la Vega J.L., Sánchez-Ruiz A., Ortuño V.M. 2014. Dima assoi Pérez Arcas 1872 (Coleoptera: Elateridae): from montane to hypogean life. An example of exaptations to the subterranean environment? Annales de la Société entomologique de France (NS) 50(3-4): 264–271. Google Scholar

    16.

    Gilgado J.D., Enghoff H., Tinaut A., Ortuño V.M. 2015. Hidden biodiversity in the Iberian Mesovoid Shallow Substratum (MSS): New and poorly known species of the millipede genus Archipolydesmus Attems, 1898 (Diplopoda, Polydesmidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 258: 13–38. Google Scholar

    17.

    Gilgado J.D., Ledesma E., Enghoff H., Mauriès J.-P., Ortuño V.M. 2017. A new genus and species of Haplobainosomatidae (Diplopoda: Chordeumatida) from the MSS of the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park, central Spain. Zootaxa 4347(3): 492–510. Google Scholar

    18.

    Gilgado J.D., Rusterholz H.-P., Baur B. 2022a. Millipedes step up: species extend their upper elevational limit in the Alps in response to climate warming. Insect Conservation and Diversity 15(1): 61–72. Google Scholar

    19.

    Gilgado J.D., Rusterholz H.-P., Braschler B., Zimmermann S., Chittaro Y. & Baur B. 2022b. Six groups of ground-dwelling arthropods show different diversity responses along elevational gradients in the Swiss Alps. PLoS One , 17(7): e0271831. Google Scholar

    20.

    Gobbi M., Caccianiga M., Compostella C., Zapparoli M. 2020. Centipede assemblages (Chilopoda) in high-altitude landforms of the Central-Eastern Italian Alps: Diversity and abundance. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 31(4): 1071–1087. Google Scholar

    21.

    Haeberli W. 1985. Creep of mountain permafrost: Internal structure and flow of Alpine rock glaciers. Mitteilungen der VAW-ETh Zürich , vol. 77, 142 pp. Google Scholar

    22.

    IUCN/WCMC 1994. Guidelines for protected area management categories. IUCN , Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, U.K . Google Scholar

    23.

    Jiménez-Valverde A., Gilgado J.D., Sendra A., Pérez-Suárez G., Herrero-Borgoñón J.J., Ortuño V.M. 2015. Exceptional invertebrate diversity in a scree slope in Eastern Spain. Journal of insect conservation 19(4): 713–728. Google Scholar

    24.

    Jordana R., Baquero E., Ledesma E., Sendra A., Ortuño V.M. 2020. Poduromorpha (Collembola) from a sampling in the mesovoid shallow substratum of the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Madrid and Segovia, Spain): Taxonomy and Biogeography. Zoologischer Anzeiger 285: 81–96. Google Scholar

    25.

    Juberthie C., Delay D., Bouillon M. 1980. Extension du milieu souterrain en zone non calcaire: description d'un nouveau milieu et de son peuplement par les Coléoptères troglobies. Mémoires de Biospéologie 7: 19–52. Google Scholar

    26.

    Juberthie C., Bouillon M., Delay B. 1981. Sur l'existence du milieu souterrain superficiel en zone calcaire. Mémoires de Biospéologie 8: 77–93. Google Scholar

    27.

    Ledesma E., Jiménez-Valverde A., de Castro A., Aguado-Aranda P., Ortuño V.M. 2019. The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa: spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum. ZooKeys 841: 39–59. Google Scholar

    28.

    Ledesma E., Jiménez-Valverde A., Baquero E., Jordana R., de Castro A., Ortuño V.M. 2020. Arthropod biodiversity patterns point to the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum (MSS) as a climate refugium. Zoology 141: 125771. Google Scholar

    29.

    López H., Oromí P. 2010. A type of trap for sampling the mesovoid shallow substratum (MSS) fauna. Speleobiology Notes 2: 7–11. Google Scholar

    30.

    Mammola S., Giachino P.M., Piano E., Jones A., Barberis M., Badino G., Isaia M. 2016. Ecology and sampling techniques of an understudied subterranean habitat: the Milieu Souterrain Superficiel (MSS). The Science of Nature 103(11): 1–24. Google Scholar

    31.

    Millar C.I., Westfall R.D., Evenden A., Holmquist J.G., Schmidt-Gengenbach J.R., Franklin R.S., Nachlinger J., Delany D.L. 2015. Potential climatic refugia in semi-arid, temperate mountains: Plant and arthropod assemblages associated with rock glaciers, talus slopes, and their fore-field wetlands, Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Quaternary International 387: 106–121. Google Scholar

    32.

    Nae I., Băncilă R.I. 2017. Mesovoid shallow substratum as a biodiversity hotspot for conservation priorities: analysis of oribatid mite (Acari: Oribatida) fauna. Acarologia 57(4): 855–868. Google Scholar

    33.

    Nae I., Nae A., Scheu S., Maraun M. 2021. Oribatid mite communities in mountain scree: stable isotopes (15 N, 13 C) reveal three trophic levels of exclusively sexual species. Experimental and Applied Acarology 83(3): 375–386. Google Scholar

    34.

    Nitzu E., Nae A., Băncilă R., Popa I., Giurginca A., Plăiaşu R. 2014. Scree habitats: ecological function, species conservation and spatial-temporal variation in the arthropod community. Systematics and Biodiversity 12(1): 65–75. Google Scholar

    35.

    Ortuño V.M., Gilgado J.D., Jiménez-Valverde A., Sendra A., Pérez-Suárez G., Herrero-Borgoñón J.J. 2013. The “alluvial mesovoid shallow substratum”, a new subterranean habitat. PLoS One 8(10): e76311. Google Scholar

    36.

    Ortuño V.M., Ledesma E., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Pérez-Suárez G. 2019. Studies of the mesovoid shallow substratum can change the accepted autecology of species: the case of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain). Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 42(2): 213–226. Google Scholar

    37.

    Paill W., Koblmüller S., Friess T., Gereben-Krenn B.A., Mairhuber C., Raupach M.J., Zangl L. 2021. Relicts from glacial times: The ground beetle Pterostichus adstrictus Eschscholtz, 1823 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the Austrian Alps. Insects 12(1): 84. Google Scholar

    38.

    Papp J. 2008. Seven new species of Aspilota Foerster from the Palaearctic region (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Alysiinae). Annales historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis hungarici 100: 245–269. Google Scholar

    39.

    Peris-Felipo F.J., Belokobylskij S.A. 2016a. First record of the genus Dinotrema Foerster, 1863 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) from the Neotropical region with description of four new species and a key to the New World taxa. European Journal of Taxonomy 179: 1–23. Google Scholar

    40.

    Peris-Felipo F.J., Belokobylskij S.A. 2016b. Avispas parasitoides de la familia Braconidae en ambientes subterráneos. Actas Espeleo Meeting Ciudad de Villacarrillo 45–48. Google Scholar

    41.

    Peris-Felipo F.J., Belokobylskij S.A., Jiménez-Peydró R. 2014. Revision of the Western Palaearctic species of the genus Dinotrema Foerster, 1862 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae). Zootaxa 3885(1): 1–483. Google Scholar

    42.

    Peris-Felipo F.J., Becerra R.G., Belokobylskij S. 2016. Aspilota ajara sp. n. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae), the first species of the genus Aspilota Foerster from caves. Journal of hymenoptera Research 52: 153–162. Google Scholar

    43.

    Rendoš M., Mock A., Jászay T. 2012. Spatial and temporal dynamics of invertebrates dwelling karstic mesovoid shallow substratum of Sivec National Nature Reserve (Slovakia), with emphasis on Coleoptera. Biologia 67(6): 1143–1151. Google Scholar

    44.

    Rendoš M., Mock A., Miklisová D. 2016. Terrestrial isopods and myriapods in a forested scree slope: subterranean biodiversity, depth gradient and annual dynamics. Journal of Natural history 50(33-34): 2129–2142. Google Scholar

    45.

    Růžička V., Thaler K. 2002. Spiders (Araneae) from deep screes in the Northern Alps (Tyrol, Austria). Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlich-medizinischen Vereins in Innsbruck 89: 137–141. Google Scholar

    46.

    Růžička V., Zacharda M., Němcová L., Šmilauer P., Nekola J.C. 2012. Periglacial microclimate in low-altitude scree slopes supports relict biodiversity. Journal of Natural history 46(35-36): 2145–2157. Google Scholar

    47.

    Schmitt T., Muster C., Schönswetter P. 2010. Are disjunct alpine and arctic-alpine animal and plant species in the Western Palearctic really “relics of a cold past”? In: Habel J.C., Assmann T. (eds). Relict Species. Springer , Berlin, heidelberg , 442 pp. Google Scholar

    48.

    Tampucci D., Gobbi M., Marano G., Boracchi P., Boffa G., Ballarin F., Pantini P., Seppi R., Compostella C., Caccianiga M. 2017. Ecology of active rock glaciers and surrounding landforms: climate, soil, plants and arthropods. Boreas 46: 185–198 Google Scholar

    49.

    Trümpy R., Schmid S., Conti P., Froitzheim N. 1997. Erläuterungen zur Geologischen Karte 1:50'000 des Schweizerischen Nationalparks. Geologische Spezialkarte Nr. 122. Parc Naziunal Svizzer, SANW/ASSN. Nationalpark Forschung in der Schweiz 87(1): 1–40. Google Scholar

    50.

    Vailati D. 1990. Insubriella paradoxa nuovo genere nuova specie di Bathysciinae delle Prealpi Italiane (Coleoptera Catopidae). Natura Bresciana 25: 213–229. Google Scholar

    51.

    Vitasse Y., Ursenbacher S., Klein G., Bohnenstengel T., Chittaro Y., Delestrade A., Monnerat C., Rebetez M., Rixen C., Strebel N., Schmidt B.R., Wipf S., Wohlgemuth T., Yoccoz N.G., Lenoir J. 2021. Phenological and elevational shifts of plants, animals and fungi under climate change in the European Alps. Biological Reviews 96(5): 1816–1835. Google Scholar

    52.

    Yu D.S., Achterberg C. van & Horstmann K. 2016. Taxapad 2016, Ichneumonoidea 2015. Taxapad, Ottawa, Ontario. [database on flash-drive]. Google Scholar

    53.

    Zacharda M., Kučera T. 2006. Diversity of predatory Rhagidiid mites (Acari: Rhagidiidae) inhabiting montane stony debris in the Otztal Alps, North Tyrol. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 38(2): 292–300. Google Scholar

    54.

    Zamani A., Fric Z.F., Gante H.F., Hopkins T., Orfinger A.B., Scherz M.D., Bartoňová A.S., Pos D.D. 2022. DNA bar-codes on their own are not enough to describe a species. Systematic Entomology 47: 385–389. Google Scholar
    Francisco Javier Peris-Felipo, José D. Gilgado, Sergey A. Belokobylskij, and Bruno Baur "From a volcanic area on the Kamchatka peninsula (Northeast Asia) to a rock glacier in the Swiss Alps: a new record of Aspilota umbrosa Belokobylskij, 2007 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae)," Revue suisse de Zoologie 131(1), 121-130, (30 April 2024). https://doi.org/10.35929/RSZ.0114
    Accepted: 20 September 2023; Published: 30 April 2024
    KEYWORDS
    high mountains
    MSS
    new records
    subterranean habitats
    Switzerland
    wasps
    Back to Top