BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 14 May 2025 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Registered users receive a variety of benefits including the ability to customize email alerts, create favorite journals list, and save searches.
Please note that a BioOne web account does not automatically grant access to full-text content. An institutional or society member subscription is required to view non-Open Access content.
Contact helpdesk@bioone.org with any questions.
We examined historical changes and patterns in the nonnative flora of Franklin County in western Massachusetts. The historical flora was documented by examining more than 16,000 herbarium specimens and additional records from the literature. We characterized the recent flora during 10 years of field work from 2010 to 2019. Temporal changes and distributions of nonnative species were examined at the town level. Among all species recorded in the county, nonnatives comprised 27.4%, or 34.8% if waifs and species persisting from cultivation with little spread are included. Nonnative species as a group increased dramatically over time relative to native species, and those nonnatives considered invasive increased more than other nonnative species. Reported frequencies of several species increased from 0 to 2 towns in the historical flora (1800–2009) to most of the 26 towns in the county today. The proportion of nonnative species in a town's flora was correlated with the human population density, but different regions of the county did not differ significantly in the proportion of nonnative species. Species from eastern Asia showed greater increases in frequencies than species from Eurasia and parts of North America outside New England, and the Asian species had later average arrival dates in the county. Species with bird-dispersed seeds were better represented among taxa showing the greatest increases than were species dispersed by wind or other means. Nonnative species with a history of herbal or culinary use increased much less than those with other patterns of human use, presumably reflecting less emphasis on some such species in local gardens. As a group, the agricultural weeds did not show patterns of change different from other species, perhaps reflecting the continued importance of agriculture in parts of the county.
This study incorporates the knowledge gained from the many genetic studies completed in the past 25 years with traditional morphological- and ecological-based species concepts to arrive at an updated taxonomy for the Sphagnum species in Massachusetts and New England. In total, 43–44 Sphagnum species are documented for Massachusetts and 53 Sphagnum species are documented for all of New England. The study provides a county checklist as well as the determination that 21 species are potentially rare in Massachusetts. Four (or five) new state records are documented for Massachusetts: S. divinum and/or S. diabolicum, S. ×mississippiense, S. ×missouricum, and S. tenellum.
This article is only available to subscribers. It is not available for individual sale.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have
purchased or subscribe to this BioOne eBook Collection. You are receiving
this notice because your organization may not have this eBook access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users-please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
Additional information about institution subscriptions can be foundhere