BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2010 A Supplemental Function of the Avian Egg Tooth
Karen L. Wiebe
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Hatchlings use egg teeth to help break through the shell during hatching, but these structures could have an additional function of increasing nestlings' visibility. I investigated the size, color, and persistence of egg teeth in woodpeckers, which nest in dark cavities. Many species of woodpecker have two egg teeth, one each on the tip of the maxilla and of the mandible, which, together with the pale flanges, frame the open mouth when nestlings gape. A spectrometer confirmed that reflectance of Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus) egg teeth is higher than that of the flanges across a wide range of wavelengths, reaching nearly 100% reflectance in the wavelengths most visible to woodpeckers. Reflectance of flanges peaked in the ultraviolet, which is less visible to woodpeckers. Therefore, parent woodpeckers can probably see egg teeth better than flanges. Within a brood, the brightness of egg teeth or flanges was not dependent on nestlings' size (hatching order), suggesting these structures are not cues of nestlings' quality. Flickers retained upper egg teeth until fledging, but the size of egg teeth did not increase after hatching. A review of the literature suggests some burrow-nesting seabirds also retain egg teeth for a long time, reinforcing the idea that egg-tooth reflectance may have evolved independently in several phylogenetic groups in which parents must find nestlings in the dark.

© 2010 by The Cooper Ornithological Society. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions website, http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintInfo.asp.
Karen L. Wiebe "A Supplemental Function of the Avian Egg Tooth," The Condor 112(1), 1-7, (1 February 2010). https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2010.090194
Received: 7 October 2009; Accepted: 1 November 2009; Published: 1 February 2010
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top