Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2020 Harmonizing Goals for Agricultural Intensification and Human Health Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Increased agricultural production will be necessary to feed rapidly growing populations in sub-Saharan Africa, where many households currently practice low-input, subsistence farming. Efforts to expand food production will likely include agricultural intensification to enhance productivity of existing cropland, and holistic frameworks are needed to quantitatively evaluate trade-offs and synergies between intensification and other dimensions of development. Beyond well-documented interactions with environmental and economic issues, intensification’s complex relationship with human health should take a position of primary importance in any framework designed to advance food security. While intensification can lead to improvements in nutritional status, neglecting sources of potential adverse health impacts, including water source contamination and direct contact with agricultural inputs or environmental pathogens, may undermine prospective gains. Harmonizing goals will require interdisciplinary teams applying frameworks that integrate tools such as quantitative risk assessment, environmental life cycle assessment, and economic models to comprehensively evaluate potentially dissimilar strategies across common metrics while accounting for interdependencies and uncertainties. With local implementation partners, these teams will be well-equipped to develop holistic interventions that effectively promote food security and protect human health while considering local constraints and opportunities across multiple dimensions of development.

Placing Agricultural Intensification Within a Broader Framework

To feed the growing global population, current agricultural production must double by 2050 (Godfray et al., 2010). Increased production will be particularly crucial in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where populations are projected to grow from 1.0 billion in 2017 to 1.9 to 2.3 billion in 2050 (United Nations, 2015), and where approximately 218 million people are currently undernourished (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2015) with increased risk of morbidity and mortality (Bain et al., 2013; de Onis & Branca, 2016). For example, among Ghanaian children younger than 5 years, 23% were stunted and 57% were afflicted with anemia in 2011 (United States Agency for International Development, 2014). The poorest households in SSA typically rely on smallholder farmers, themselves hovering precariously on the threshold of food insecurity, who practice subsistence agriculture characterized by low chemical inputs and high labor requirements (Frelat et al., 2016; Goldsmith, 2017; van Ittersum et al., 2016; Tscharntke et al., 2012). Considering agriculture already represents the largest land use on the planet (Foley et al., 2011), one plausible path to increasing food production involves agricultural intensification (Palm et al., 2017; Spera, 2017), which enhances productivity of existing cropland through increased cropping intensity, irrigation, fertilizer and pesticide use, and monoculture (Foley et al., 2011; Matson, Parton, Power, & Swift, 1997; van Ittersum et al., 2016).

Achieving the greatest benefits through agricultural intensification requires considering its interactions with other dimensions of development (Garnett et al., 2013). Perhaps the most well-established connections concern its negative environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions, water scarcity due to irrigation demands and climate change, soil erosion, pesticide resistance, and highly altered nitrogen and phosphorus cycling (Alliance for a Green Revolution, 2014; Foley et al., 2011; Matson et al., 1997; Kassie, Teklewold, Jaleta, Marenya, & Erenstein, 2015; Steffen et al., 2015; Tilman, Cassman, Matson, Naylor, & Polasky, 2002; West et al., 2014), suggesting that any agricultural transition should focus on resource efficiency and conservation along with improved yields (Mueller et al., 2012; van Ittersum et al., 2016). From an economic standpoint, offering households greater opportunities to diversify and safeguard their livelihoods through improved market access, off-farm employment, and rural infrastructure may be at least as important as agricultural intensification in reducing rural poverty (Frelat et al., 2016; Godfray et al., 2010; Rosegrant & Cline, 2003; van Ittersum et al., 2016). Beyond these considerations, the relationship between agricultural intensification and human health should take a position of primary importance in any framework designed to advance food security. While substantial improvements in nutrition, health status, and economic well-being could be achieved through intensification, neglecting sources of potential adverse health impacts could create cycles that undermine prospective health gains.

Elucidating Connections Between Human Health and Agricultural Intensification

While agricultural intensification has the potential to contribute to increased food security and improved health outcomes, it can also open various risk pathways that may compromise human health in other ways. For example, one aspect of intensification involves farmers using greater quantities and application rates of pesticides, but many widely-used pesticides are known to have negative health effects, both acute (e.g., enzyme inhibition causing vomiting, diarrhea, or respiratory failure) and chronic (e.g., endocrine disruption, neuropsychiatric impairment, heart and liver damage, and multiple cancers; Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology [EAWAG], 2016). Moreover, the most hazardous pesticides, banned in many high-income countries, continue to be stockpiled and circulated in SSA, where workers who may have limited access to protective equipment also may not be informed of proper handling procedures or health impacts (EAWAG, 2016; Jepson et al., 2014; Sheahan, Barrett, & Goldvale, 2017). Pesticide exposure can occur through numerous pathways, including through consuming foods retaining pesticide residues and drinking water contaminated by agricultural runoff (Akoto, Andoh, Darko, Eshun, & Osei-Fosu, 2013; Akoto, Gavor, Appah, & Apau, 2015; Bempah, Donkor, Yeboah, Dubey, & Osei-Fosu, 2011; Fosu-Mensah, Okoffo, Darko, & Gordon, 2016). For farmers and their families in SSA, the highest risks may come from direct contact or inhalation during pesticide application, mixing, and in-home storage, due to improper handling and insufficient protective equipment (EAWAG, 2016; Jepson et al., 2014).

Increased fertilizer application can lead to another set of health risks, although their severity likely depends on local soil conditions and nutrient retention (Neill et al., 2017; Palm et al., 2017). Along with increased eutrophication potential (Smith, Tilman, & Nekola, 1999), surface water or groundwater sources contaminated with agricultural runoff or leachate can exhibit elevated nitrate and nitrite concentrations (Matson et al., 1997; Tilman, 1999), which are connected with methemoglobinemia (blue baby syndrome; Fewtrell, 2004; Sadler et al., 2016). Possible connections with birth defects and various cancers have also been reported (Brender et al., 2013; Sadler et al., 2016; Ward et al., 2005), although these links remain uncertain and have not been incorporated into international drinking water guidelines (World Health Organization, 2011). Furthermore, if animal manure or human waste are used as supplementary nutrient sources, the risk of pathogenic exposure through direct contact or drinking water contamination may be significant (Gerba & Smith, 2005; Tyrrel & Quinton, 2003).

Pathogenic exposure and infection, while not always directly related to agriculture, can undermine the benefits of increased food availability by affecting human nutrient absorption. Enteric infections, including diarrheal diseases, soil-transmitted helminths, and environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), can reduce intestinal absorption and divert nutrients away from growth to immune response, contributing to a cycle in which infection causes worsened nutritional status and leading to greater susceptibility for further infection (de Onis & Branca, 2016; Guerrant, Oriá, Moore, Oriá, & Lima, 2008; Korpe & Petri, 2012). Acute exposure to infected feces can cause diarrheal and soil-transmitted helminth infections, while chronic fecal pathogen exposure is hypothesized to be the primary cause of EED (Korpe & Petri, 2012; Trehan, Kelly, Shaikh, & Manary, 2016). Exposure to environmental chemicals, including pesticides, may also contribute to EED (Mapesa, Maxwell, & Ryan, 2016). Enteric infections that reduce nutrient absorption and impair immune function may play a substantial role in malnutrition, as gold standard nutrition interventions are estimated to reduce child stunting by only one third (Bhutta et al., 2008). Therefore, reducing enteric infections through water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions may enable greater realization of the nutritional benefits of increased food security.

Harmonizing Goals and Moving Toward Holistic Interventions

To achieve lasting and consequential gains in nutritional security, efforts toward agricultural intensification should account for interactions with health and other-related dimensions of development (e.g., water and sanitation, education, energy; Sanchez, Denning, & Nziguheba, 2009; Wallington & Cai, 2017). In this effort, planners must identify and understand diverse, locally relevant, and often uncertain variables and decisions, such as those related to hydrology, climate, local soil quality, chemical storage and application practices, the types of fertilizers and pesticides available, knowledge and applicability of organic farming practices, and water sources (Godfray et al., 2010; Michelson, 2017; Mueller et al., 2012). Harmonizing goals for improved human health and increased agricultural productivity constitute a core aspect of this endeavor and can encompass a variety of possibilities. Holistic approaches explicitly integrating improved food security, nutrition, and WASH could generate synergistic benefits by breaking the cycle surrounding enteric infections. The results of current trials (Arnold et al., 2013; Humphrey et al., 2015) testing nutrition and WASH interventions’ individual and combined effects may provide strong evidence for future integration across these dimensions of development. In addition, strategies already being explored to address the environmental concerns of intensification could provide simultaneous human health protection. Techniques including precision agriculture, reduced tillage, contour farming, crop rotation, polyculture, agroforestry, and improved farmer education on crop-specific nutrient requirements and pesticide application have the potential to limit fertilizer and pesticide use, reduce environmental contamination, and improve crop resilience to climate change, thereby lessening associated health risks (Godfray et al., 2010; Goldsmith, 2017; Matson et al., 1997; Mueller et al., 2012; Waldron et al., 2017).

Given the broad range and varied effects of possible strategies, maximizing intended benefits and minimizing unintended consequences require structured frameworks capable of identifying and analyzing trade-offs and synergies across dimensions of development (Wallington & Cai, 2017). For example, pesticide use is correlated with improved agricultural output and income, but it can also cause adverse health outcomes that lead to increased health-care costs and time lost due to illness (Sheahan et al., 2017). As another illustration, intensification may reduce crop diversity on smallholder farms, potentially diminishing dietary diversity and its nutritional benefits (Jones, Shrinivas, & Bezner-Kerr, 2014; Pellegrini & Tasciotti, 2014), although access to new and better markets may counteract these dietary losses (Sibhatu, Krishna, & Qaim, 2015) and enhance food security and rural development (Endres & Endres, 2017). Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) frameworks (Haas, Rose, & Gerba, 2014), applicable to chemical and microbial contaminants and various exposure pathways, may be particularly appropriate in ensuring that human health is protected. QRA provides a proactive approach capable of estimating the effects of potential interventions and suggesting improvements before any health hazards occur. Furthermore, QRA can be integrated with other tools, such as environmental life cycle assessment, to simultaneously evaluate outcomes and consider trade-offs across multiple dimensions of development (Kobayashi, Peters, Ashbolt, Shiels, & Khan, 2015; Kobayashi, Peters, & Khan, 2015). Linking QRA and life cycle assessment with economic models that estimate altered labor availability, health-care expenditures, and income from correlations with crop yields, food security, and health status (Sheahan et al., 2017) could lead to comprehensive frameworks able to compare dissimilar interventions across common metrics, accounting for the interdependencies that connect agriculture, environmental sustainability, economics, and health (Brawn, 2017; Cohn, 2017; Waldron et al., 2017; Wallington & Cai, 2017).

Any multifaceted framework or intervention must additionally consider a wide array of social, political, economic, and historical dimensions while accounting for various spatial scales, value systems, local constraints, and variabilities inherent in relevant variables and decisions (Endres & Endres, 2017; Garnett et al., 2013; Godfray et al., 2010; Palm et al., 2017; Sheahan et al., 2017; Tilman et al., 2002; Waldron et al., 2017). Building analytical models that allow for stochastic variables, randomly generated simulations, stakeholder involvement, and multicriteria decision analysis (Mendoza & Martins, 2006) will be particularly useful in addressing the uncertainties surrounding various parameters (e.g., health outcomes) and comprehensively evaluating context-specific strategies with disparate aspects across multiple scenarios. This level of complexity suggests a pressing need for dynamic interdisciplinary research teams capable of thinking holistically to harmonize multiple, qualitatively distinct goals. As evidenced by the connections and risks outlined above, any such team focused on improving agricultural productivity should include environmental and health specialists, as well as experts on complementary topics such as government policy, market access and employment, rural infrastructure, sociology, and gender equity. With local implementation partners (Palm et al., 2017), these diverse teams are well-equipped to develop holistic interventions that promote food security, protect health, and produce positive, appropriate, and enduring change.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research is in part funded by the USAID Feed the Future Lab for Soybean Value Chain Research. The award number is Cooperative Agreement Number AID-OAA-L-14-00001.

References

1.

Alliance for a Green Revolution. (2014). Africa agriculture status report: Climate change and smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Retrieved from  https://agra.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/africa-agriculture-status-report-2014.pdfGoogle Scholar

2.

Akoto, O., Andoh, H., Darko, G., Eshun, K., Osei-Fosu, P., (2013) Health risk assessment of pesticides residue in maize and cowpea from Ejura, Ghana. Chemosphere 92(1): 67–73. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.057Google Scholar

3.

Akoto, O., Gavor, S., Appah, M. K., Apau, J., (2015) Estimation of human health risk associated with the consumption of pesticide-contaminated vegetables from Kumasi, Ghana. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187(5): 244. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4471-0Google Scholar

4.

Arnold, B. F., Null, C., Luby, S. P., Unicomb, L., Stewart, C. P., Dewey, K. G., Colford, J. M., (2013) Cluster-randomised controlled trials of individual and combined water, sanitation, hygiene and nutritional interventions in rural Bangladesh and Kenya: the WASH Benefits study design and rationale. BMJ Open 3(8): e003476. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003476Google Scholar

5.

Bain, L. E., Awah, P. K., Geraldine, N., Kindong, N. P., Siga, Y., Bernard, N., Tanjeko, A. T., (2013) Malnutrition in Sub–Saharan Africa: Burden, causes and prospects. Pan African Medical Journal 15(1):Retrieved from  https://www.ajol.info/index.php/pamj/article/view/100127Google Scholar

6.

Bempah, C. K., Donkor, A., Yeboah, P. O., Dubey, B., Osei-Fosu, P., (2011) A preliminary assessment of consumer’s exposure to organochlorine pesticides in fruits and vegetables and the potential health risk in Accra Metropolis, Ghana. Food Chemistry 128(4): 1058–1065. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.013Google Scholar

7.

Bhutta, Z. A., Ahmed, T., Black, R. E., Cousens, S., Dewey, K., Giugliani, E., Shekar, M., (2008) What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. The Lancet 371(9610): 417–440. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61693-6. Google Scholar

8.

Brawn, J. D. (2017). Implications of agricultural development for tropical biodiversity. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

9.

Brender, J. D., Weyer, P. J., Romitti, P. A., Mohanty, B. P., Shinde, M. U., Vuong, A. M., Canfield, M. A., (2013) Prenatal nitrate intake from drinking water and selected birth defects in offspring of participants in the national birth defects prevention study. Environmental Health Perspectives 121(9): 1083–1089. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206249Google Scholar

10.

Cohn, A. (2017). Leveraging climate regulation by ecosystems for agriculture to promote ecosystem stewardship. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

11.

de Onis, M., Branca, F., (2016) Childhood stunting: A global perspective. Maternal & Child Nutrition 12: 12–26. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12231Google Scholar

12.

Endres, A. B., & Endres, R. (2017). The European Union, agriculture, and the tropics: Public financial incentives to enhance food security and expansion of production contracts. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

13.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2015). Regional overview of food insecurity: African food security prospects brighter than ever. Retrieved from  http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/9186338b-3fe6-427c-b805-fe81be23a676/Google Scholar

14.

Fewtrell, L., (2004) Drinking-Water nitrate, methemoglobinemia, and global burden of disease: A discussion. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(14): 1371–1374. Google Scholar

15.

Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Zaks, D. P. M., (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478(7369): 337–342. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452Google Scholar

16.

Fosu-Mensah, B. Y., Okoffo, E. D., Darko, G., Gordon, C., (2016) Assessment of organochlorine pesticide residues in soils and drinking water sources from cocoa farms in Ghana. SpringerPlus 5(1): 869. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2352-9Google Scholar

17.

Frelat, R., Lopez-Ridaura, S., Giller, K. E., Herrero, M., Douxchamps, S., Djurfeldt, A. A., Wijk, M. T., van (2016) Drivers of household food availability in sub-Saharan Africa based on big data from small farms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(2): 458–463. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518384112Google Scholar

18.

Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., Godfray, H. C. J., (2013) Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science 341(6141): 33–34. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485Google Scholar

19.

Gerba, C. P., Smith, J. E., (2005) Sources of pathogenic microorganisms and their fate during land application of wastes. Journal of Environmental Quality 34(1): 42–48. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0042Google Scholar

20.

Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Toulmin, C., (2010) Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967): 812–818. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383Google Scholar

21.

Goldsmith, P. (2017). The Faustian bargain of tropical grain production. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

22.

Guerrant, R. L., Oriá, R. B., Moore, S. R., Oriá, M. O., Lima, A. A., (2008) Malnutrition as an enteric infectious disease with long-term effects on child development. Nutrition Reviews 66(9): 487–505. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00082.xGoogle Scholar

23.

Haas, C. N., Rose, J. B., Gerba, C. P., (2014) Quantitative microbial risk assessment, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar

24.

Humphrey, J. H., Jones, A. D., Manges, A., Mangwadu, G., Maluccio, J. A., Mbuya, M. N. N., Mujuru, H. A., (2015) The sanitation hygiene infant nutrition efficacy (SHINE) trial: Rationale, design, and methods. Clinical Infectious Diseases 61(suppl_7): S685–S702. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ844Google Scholar

25.

Jepson, P. C., Guzy, M., Blaustein, K., Sow, M., Sarr, M., Mineau, P., Kegley, S., (2014) Measuring pesticide ecological and health risks in West African agriculture to establish an enabling environment for sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369(1639): 20130491. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0491Google Scholar

26.

Jones, A. D., Shrinivas, A., Bezner-Kerr, R., (2014) Farm production diversity is associated with greater household dietary diversity in Malawi: Findings from nationally representative data. Food Policy 46: 1–12. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.001Google Scholar

27.

Kassie, M., Teklewold, H., Jaleta, M., Marenya, P., Erenstein, O., (2015) Understanding the adoption of a portfolio of sustainable intensification practices in eastern and southern Africa. Land Use Policy 42: 400–411. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.016Google Scholar

28.

Kobayashi, Y., Peters, G. M., Ashbolt, N. J., Shiels, S., Khan, S. J., (2015) Assessing burden of disease as disability adjusted life years in life cycle assessment. Science of the Total Environment 530–531: 120–128. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.017Google Scholar

29.

Kobayashi, Y., Peters, G. M., Khan, S. J., (2015) Towards more holistic environmental impact assessment: Hybridisation of life cycle assessment and quantitative risk assessment. Procedia CIRP 29: 378–383. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.064Google Scholar

30.

Korpe, P. S., Petri, W. A. Jr (2012) Environmental enteropathy: Critical implications of a poorly understood condition. Trends in Molecular Medicine 18(6): 328–336. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2012.04.007Google Scholar

31.

Mapesa, J. O., Maxwell, A. L., Ryan, E. P., (2016) An exposome perspective on environmental enteric dysfunction. Environmental Health Perspectives 124(8): 1121–1126. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510459Google Scholar

32.

Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., Swift, M. J., (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277(5325): 504–509. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.504Google Scholar

33.

Mendoza, G. A., Martins, H., (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management 230(1–3): 1–22. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023Google Scholar

34.

Michelson, H. (2017). Variable soils, variable fertilizer quality, variable prospects. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

35.

Mueller, N. D., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Ray, D. K., Ramankutty, N., Foley, J. A., (2012) Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490(7419): 254–257. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11420Google Scholar

36.

Neill, C., Jankowski, J., Brando, P. M., Coe, M. T., Deegan, L. A., Macedo, M. N., … Krusche, A. V. (2017). Surprisingly modest water quality impacts from expansion and intensification of large-scale commercial agriculture in the Brazilian Amazon-Cerrado region. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

37.

Palm, C., Neill, C., Lefebvre, P., & Tully, K. (2017). Targeting sustainable intensification of maize-based agriculture in East Africa. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

38.

Pellegrini, L., Tasciotti, L., (2014) Crop diversification, dietary diversity and agricultural income: Empirical evidence from eight developing countries. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement 35(2): 211–227. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2014.898580Google Scholar

39.

Rosegrant, M. W., Cline, S. A., (2003) Global food security: Challenges and policies. Science 302(5652): 1917–1919. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092958Google Scholar

40.

Sadler, R., Maetam, B., Edokpolo, B., Connell, D., Yu, J., Stewart, D., Laksono, B., (2016) Health risk assessment for exposure to nitrate in drinking water from village wells in Semarang, Indonesia. Environmental Pollution. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.041Google Scholar

41.

Sanchez, P. A., Denning, G. L., Nziguheba, G., (2009) The African Green Revolution moves forward. Food Security 1(1): 37–44. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-009-0011-5Google Scholar

42.

Sheahan, M., Barrett, C. B., & Goldvale, C. (2017). Human health and pesticide use in sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural Economics. Retrieved from  http://barrett.dyson.cornell.edu/files/papers/Sheahan%20Barrett%20Goldvale%20-%20SSA%20pesticide%20and%20human%20health%20paper%20Mar%202017%20final.pdfGoogle Scholar

43.

Sibhatu, K. T., Krishna, V. V., Qaim, M., (2015) Production diversity and dietary diversity in smallholder farm households. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(34): 10657–10662. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510982112Google Scholar

44.

Smith, V. H., Tilman, G. D., Nekola, J. C., (1999) Eutrophication: Impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Pollution 100(1–3): 179–196. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00091-3. Google Scholar

45.

Spera, S. (2017). Agricultural intensification can preserve the Brazilian Cerrado: Applying lessons from Mato Grosso and Goiás to Brazil's last agricultural frontier. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

46.

Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Sörlin, S., (2015) Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223): 1259855. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855Google Scholar

47.

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology. (2016). Chemical pollution in low- and middle-income countries. Retrieved from  http://www.eawag.ch/en/department/sandec/publications/chemical-pollution/Google Scholar

48.

Tilman, D., (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96(11): 5995–6000. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995Google Scholar

49.

Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., Polasky, S., (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418(6898): 671–677. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014Google Scholar

50.

Trehan, I., Kelly, P., Shaikh, N., Manary, M. J., (2016) New insights into environmental enteric dysfunction. Archives of Disease in Childhood 101(8): 741–744. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309534Google Scholar

51.

Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Wanger, T. C., Jackson, L., Motzke, I., Perfecto, I., Whitbread, A., (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation 151(1): 53–59. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068Google Scholar

52.

Tyrrel, S. F., Quinton, J. N., (2003) Overland flow transport of pathogens from agricultural land receiving faecal wastes. Journal of Applied Microbiology 94: 87–93. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.10.xGoogle Scholar

53.

United Nations. (2015). World population prospects: The 2015 revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Retrieved from  https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Google Scholar

54.

United States Agency for International Development. (2014). Ghana: Nutrition profile. Retrieved from  https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1864/USAID-Ghana-Profile.pdfGoogle Scholar

55.

van Ittersum, M. K., van Bussel, L. G. J., Wolf, J., Grassini, P., van Wart, J., Guilpart, N., Cassman, K. G., (2016) Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(52): 14964–14969. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610359113Google Scholar

56.

Waldron, A., Garrity, D., Malhi, Y., Girardin, C., Miller, D. C., & Seddon, N. (2017). Agroforestry can enhance food security while meeting other. Sustainable Development Goals, 10Google Scholar

57.

Wallington, K., & Cai, X. (2017). The food-energy-water nexus: A framework to address sustainable development in the tropics. Tropical Conservation Science, 10Google Scholar

58.

Ward, M. H., deKok, T. M., Levallois, P., Brender, J., Gulis, G., Nolan, B. T., VanDerslice, J., (2005) Workgroup report: Drinking-water nitrate and health-recent findings and research needs. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(11): 1607–1614. Google Scholar

59.

West, P. C., Gerber, J. S., Engstrom, P. M., Mueller, N. D., Brauman, K. A., Carlson, K. M., Siebert, S., (2014) Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment. Science 345(6194): 325–328. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246067Google Scholar

60.

World Health Organization. (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from  http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/dwq-guidelines-4/en/Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2017 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
John T. Trimmer, Valerie Bauza, Diana M. Byrne, Amanda Lardizabal, and Jeremy S. Guest "Harmonizing Goals for Agricultural Intensification and Human Health Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa," Tropical Conservation Science 10(1), (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917720666
Received: 30 May 2017; Accepted: 30 May 2017; Published: 1 January 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top