Registered users receive a variety of benefits including the ability to customize email alerts, create favorite journals list, and save searches.
Please note that a BioOne web account does not automatically grant access to full-text content. An institutional or society member subscription is required to view non-Open Access content.
Contact helpdesk@bioone.org with any questions.
To access seals (Pinnipedia), polar bears (Ursus maritimus) move large distances over the sea ice in winter. Already documented declines in ice duration for Hudson Bay, Canada, are predicted to continue, likely affecting polar bear movement patterns. Using data from global positioning system (GPS) collars, 2007–2011, we describe movement patterns of adult female polar bears of the Southern Hudson Bay (SH) subpopulation. We tested effects of season and reproductive class on movement rates, distance travelled, displacement distance and direction, and home range size. Except for denning females, reproductive class had no effect on movement rates, which were greatest during freeze-up and least during summer. Across all reproductive classes and seasons, mean hourly movement rate was 0.63 km/hour. Mean annual distance moved by nondenning females was 4,771 km. During freeze-up, bears moved north-easterly from the Ontario coast toward the Belcher Islands and Québec following the forming ice edge. During breakup, bears moved southerly toward the Ontario coast and away from the residual ice that occurs north of the Ontario coast. In autumn, denning females moved southerly and inland to den. Mean annual minimum convex polygon (MCP) home-range size was 153,866 km2, with no effect of reproductive class nor change over time. Home range estimates from kernel density estimators and Brownian bridge movement models (BBMM) varied by reproductive class and were smaller than MCP ones. The BBMM estimates likely yield more realistic patterns of space use by polar bears. Using data from satellite collars, 1997–2003, we compared travel distance and home range size between periods (1997–2003; 2007–2011). We found weak evidence of a difference in distance moved between periods, perhaps due to a period of ice stability in the 2000s. Our results identified patterns of use of extensive areas of Hudson Bay by SH bears in winter, and results provide benchmarks for future studies of movement patterns.
This article is only available to subscribers. It is not available for individual sale.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have
purchased or subscribe to this BioOne eBook Collection. You are receiving
this notice because your organization may not have this eBook access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users-please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
Additional information about institution subscriptions can be foundhere